Embed
Email

Fencing Study Group Presentation

Document Sample

Shared by: huanghengdong
Categories
Tags
Stats
views:
0
posted:
1/17/2012
language:
pages:
35
Bay Breeze Point

“A Premier Waterfront Community”







HOA Fencing Study Group

January – September 2010









1

Phase 1 -- Study Group Objective

• Identify legal status of two areas of fencing:



– Black metal fencing that runs along the waterway

behind several homes on Bay Point Drive



– White masonry fencing that runs along 30th Bay

behind several homes and around the entrance to

Bay Breeze Point on Pleasant Avenue





2

Phase 1 -- Study Group Overall

Conclusions

• HOA has NO ownership of, liability for, responsibility for, or

access to the black metal fence behind the eleven (11) Bay

Point Drive homes/lots.



• HOA has NO ownership of, liability for, responsibility for, or

access to the white masonry fence along 30th Bay and at the

Pleasant Avenue entrance with the exception of the easement

pertaining to the four (4) sections south of Pleasant Avenue

around the pumping station.

– Access to the white masonry fence located on City of Norfolk property

was granted to the HOA via a variable perpetual landscape easement

(adjacent to Pleasant Ave) and a four foot landscape maintenance

easement (adjacent to 30th Bay). (June Update: Easements were

issued to Developer Moore and never transferred – City of Norfolk is

working the issue.)



3

Phase 1 -- Recap of White Masonry

Fence Findings & Conclusions

N





1994 was private property

North Wall 2002 was private property

2002 wall built by Letchworth

2010 is private property

Bay

Breeze

1994 was private property Point

Entrance – North Side 1994 wall built by Moore

2010 is private property



Pleasant Ave

1989 was private property

Entrance – South Side 1990 transferred to city City Pump House

1994 wall built by Moore w/easement

2010 is city property





1994 was private property

South Fence/Wall 1994 wall built by Moore

2010 is private property



30th Bay St

5

Phase 2 -- Study Group Objectives



• Identify potential options for white masonry

fence/wall given its legal status, e.g., maintenance



• Consolidate potential options for presentation to

HOA for consideration and/or approval









6

Phase 2 -- Initial Plan of Action

• Group Meetings

– June 21 -- Initial meeting: recap Phase 1 study; discuss way

ahead for Phase 2

• June 22-July 5: Group members develop options; then options are

consolidated for July 12th meeting

– July 12 -- Discuss consolidated options and identify items

for further evaluations, etc.

– August 16 -- Finalize options for presentation during

September 9th HOA meeting

• Draft Phase 2 Executive Summary



7

8

9

10

Backup Slides









11

Study Group Process





• Base Study and Results on facts

not opinions



• Identify legally binding items







12

Study Group Actions

• Study Group Members – Jerry Baker, John Bergman, Jim

Casey, Fred Sciulli, Fran Scott, and Steve Woll



• Six group meetings held between January – May 2010



• Over 120 man-hours researching and discussing fencing legal

status



• Group will provide the results of its study to the 2010 BBP

Board of Directors on May 17, 2010



• Group will help the BBP Board of Directors develop and

execute a HOA-wide roll out of the study and its results which

will culminate with a HOA special meeting in September 2010

13

Study Group Actions

• HOA Insurance Policy – talked with agent who initiated

fencing insurance coverage (agent is still in place)



• Norfolk Clerk’s Office – visited the Norfolk Clerk’s Office on

February 8/9, March 25/26, and April 8 to search for BBP

related documents that may have been filed in that office



• City Attorney’s Office – discussed white masonry fencing on

City of Norfolk property



• Group Members met with or requested information from

several HOA members.



• Researched pertinent documents



• Utilized City of Norfolk property website –

“http://gisapp1.norfolk.gov/norfolkair/”



14

Study Group Findings

Chronology of Key Events

• Circa 1989 – Developer Moore in charge of future BBP Property

• Circa 1990 – Developer Moore dedicates property by Pleasant Ave

Entrance to City of Norfolk for a pumping station and obtains easement for

wall & landscaping on that property

• Circa 1994 – Developer Moore constructs white masonry fence along 30th

Bay from Pretty Lake Ave up to Pleasant Ave and 4 sections north of

Pleasant Ave

• Circa 1998 – Developer Letchworth takes over

• Circa 2000 – Black metal fence installed

• Circa 2002 – White masonry fence extended from 4 sections north of

Pleasant Ave to Lot 86 (9629 DR)

• Circa 2003 – BBP homeowners take over HOA Board of Directors and use

same Management Company as Developer Letchworth (UPA)

15

17

Developer Installed Fencing

Phase One Phase Two









• Black Metal Fence along

Little Creek Entrance

Channel

• Extended White

• In place, White Masonry Masonry Fence from

Fence along 30th Bay and 4 sections north of

on each side of Pleasant Pleasant Ave up to

Ave (4 sections on North Lot 86 (9629 DR)

side)

19

Information at Start of Study

• Black Metal Fence • White Masonry Fence

– Runs behind eleven (11) – Runs behind 14 homes

Bay Point Drive homes & and 1 vacant lot and

one (1) vacant lot around the entrance to

Bay Breeze Point

– HOA maintains an

insurance policy that – HOA maintains an

includes the fence insurance policy that

includes the fence

– Fence is similar to Bay

Point fencing – HOA funded a major

repainting – circa 2004

20

Information at Start of Study

• BBP Covenants, Restrictions, Reservations, &

Easements addresses “Common Areas” and the

responsibilities associated with them, e.g.,

– Article I, Section 1.8 – defines “Common Areas” as the real estate

specifically designated as “Common Areas” on recorded plats of the

Properties … executed by the Declarant and recorded in the Clerk’s

Office



– Article IV, Section 4.1 – Obligates the HOA for “Common Areas”

conveyed to the Association and all the improvements thereon



– Exhibit C ,“Common Area” – None Listed





21

Information at Start of Study





• City of Norfolk



– No documentation transferring ownership of any

property to the HOA had been located within the

Clerk’s office



– HOA has paid no property tax



22

Prior BBP Boards of Directors Attempted to

Clarify White Masonry Fence Status



• White Masonry Fence legal status has been an issue

since HOA transition from community developer

circa 2002/2003

• Prior fencing legal status research on behalf of the

BOD appeared to follow earlier management

company (UPA) guidance

• Prior legal opinions appeared to be based on

potential intentions and selected statements, not

documents filed within the Clerk’s Office 23

Study Group Findings

• Black metal and white masonry fence legal status has been an issue since the

HOA transition from Declarant to homeowners.

• “Common Elements” -- an essential feature of a condominium development,

are all portions of a condominium other than the units that are used by all the

unit owners. BBP is not a condominium within the meaning of the Virginia

Condominium Act because there are no undivided interests in common

elements vested in the unit owners.

• BBP has NO common areas as defined by “Declaration of Covenants,

Restrictions, Reservations, and Easements of Bay Breeze Point”.

• NO documents could be found within the Clerk’s office that passed any real or

personal property to the HOA by Developer Letchworth.

• City of Norfolk documents for Phase 1 have white masonry fence located on

individual lots vice common areas. Phase 2 documents did not initially depict

white masonry fence north of Pleasant Avenue (except the first four sections)

given it was added circa 2002 by the developer within the boundaries of

individual lots and not separate common areas.

• BBP pays NO property taxes.



24

Study Group Findings

• BBP HOA obtained insurance coverage for fencing in 2003 based on guidance from

BBP Property Manager.



• BBP HOA’s Board of Directors approved a major white masonry fence repainting circa

2004. Legal status of the fence and responsibility for its maintenance had not been

formally established.



• BBP HOA’s Board of Directors approved a white masonry fence resolution (# 92208-2)

on September 22, 2008 that restricted use of HOA funds and required HOA approval

along with special assessment.



• BBP HOA annually funds landscaping/lawn care for the areas immediately around the

Pleasant Avenue entrance – these actions are performed on both City of Norfolk and

private property not HOA property.



• BBP HOA Board of Directors continues to base the majority of the HOA reserves

requirement on the white masonry fence maintenance/repairs.







25

Study Group Specific Findings:

Black Metal Fence



• Fence was installed by community

developer as a border between

bric-brac bank and Bay Point Drive

lots.



• In several cases, fence has been

altered by adding gates, etc.

• Developer-installed fence

runs behind eleven (11) lots

along Bay Point Drive (twelfth • Fence location restricts its use to

lot fence was owner installed). the eleven (11) Bay Point Drive lot

• Fence is located on Federal owners.

Government property.

26

Study Group Specific Findings:

White Masonry Fence

• Fence runs behind 14 homes and on one vacant lot along 30th Bay and at BBP entrance on

Pleasant Avenue.



• Fence was installed by community developers.

– Fence at the Pleasant Avenue entrance (4 sections on North and 4 sections on South

side of Pleasant Avenue) and fence to the South was constructed circa 1994 by Moore.

– Fence running North from the 4 sections build by Moore, was constructed circa 2002 by

Letchworth.



• All fencing is located on private properties or City of Norfolk property (first 4 sections of

fence south of Pleasant Avenue are located on City of Norfolk pumping station property).



• Two wall and landscape maintenance easements were found – both involve the first 4

sections of fence south of Pleasant Ave on City of Norfolk property. One was a variable four

(4) foot wall and landscape maintenance easement and the other was a variable width

perpetual easement for the installation and maintenance of a brick wall and landscaping.









27

Study Group Conclusions

• HOA has NO “Common Area(s)” as defined by the Declaration of Covenants,

Restrictions, Reservations and Easements of BBP.

• White masonry fence was constructed by property developers Moore &

Letchworth on property that was incorporated into individual lots (private

properties) or property dedicated to the City of Norfolk for a pumping station.

• Access to the white masonry fence located on City of Norfolk property was granted

to the HOA via a variable perpetual landscape easement (adjacent to Pleasant Ave)

and a four foot landscape maintenance easement (adjacent to 30th Bay).

• HOA has maintained the landscaping at the Pleasant Avenue entrance on City of

Norfolk and private properties.

• Black metal fence was built by the developer on Federal Government Property and

has restricted access.

• HOA should review its current insurance policies and consider future policy

adjustments for fencing property coverages.





28

Suggested HOA Roll-out Plan

• Forward letter to each lot owner:

– Explaining the HOA fencing issues



– Providing them an executive level summary of study & results



– Post executive level summary on community website



– Informing them of special HOA fencing meeting on September 9, 2010 at

6:30PM at the Ocean View Library (Mary D. Pretlow Anchor Branch

Library) in Meeting Rooms 1&2



• Objective: Notify each Lot Owner of the study’s findings and

conclusions via mail and/or in person at the September meeting



29

White Masonry Fencing around

Pleasant Ave Entrance (circa 2009)









City of Norfolk Property



Private Property







30

Pleasant Ave Entrance

to Bay Breeze Point circa 1999









Note: 1) Pump Station in place

2) White masonry fence









31



Related docs
Other docs by huanghengdong
6th-syllabus-Threet-2011-2012
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Gina Cillo rd
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
szoftverfejlesztok.xls
Views: 1  |  Downloads: 0
cv-notes-exemple
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Damascus Steel_seth Willouhby
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
UP_HolderReportingManual
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
4
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
ScienceFairLesson2
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
By registering with docstoc.com you agree to our
privacy policy

You are almost ready to download!

You are almost ready to download!