STRATEGIES FOR SUCCESSFUL BUSINESS AND GROUP MEETING
Document Sample


DEFINITION OF GROUP MEETING:
Meetings are generally defined negatively:
They „sow but do not reap‟; „a camel is a
horse designed by a committee‟ etc.
But a meeting is a gathering of two or more
people where purposive discourse occurs
The purpose of the meeting may be formal
(clear, planned) or informal (unplanned,
free-flowing).
INFORMAL GROUP:
Casual or informal groups may meet for
social purposes or to interact
spontaneously, without plan.
For example, meeting friends over lunch
or office colleagues after work.
Informal meetings may give rise to need
for structured, planned meetings.
FORMAL GROUPS:
Formal groups are also called task-
oriented groups.
They search for answers to problems,
make recommendations to a higher
authority
They meet to change policy and decide
on implementing decisions
Groups are formed due to strong
interpersonal likes or preferences
There are four stages in formation of
groups:
Forming: it is the orientation phase where
the group is started
Storming: members begin to stake out
their positions, conflicts and arguments
may arise
Norming: Members work to solve
conflicts and recognize acceptable
kinds of conduct
Performing: here the group begins to
achieve its goal
Such groups follow certain phases in
solving problems
Orientation: the initial process of free-
flowing discussions where questions are
raised and information is exchanged.
the members‟ convictions are tentative
and ambiguous here
Conflict: when members begin to offer
opinions, conflicts may occur
Emergence: in this phase the open
exchanges of views continue and
compromises occur
There is a sincere effort to decrease
conflict and differences in opinion
Solutions: options have been discussed
and criteria for measuring those options
have been viewed.
Now it is the time to complete the task
and agree upon a solution
Meetings have two main purposes:
To present information
To help solve problems
There are three types of meetings:
Informational meetings
Suggested solution meetings
Problem- solving meetings
Informational meetings:
help the members learn, ask questions
and seek understanding of issues and to
get information e.g.
Report on company‟s strategic plans for
the next fiscal year
Announcement of the new mission
statement
Suggested solution meetings:
are held for exploring options and recommendations
about solving problems
The scenario comprises of following steps:
A supervisor senses a problem and calls for a meeting
to explore options to solve the problem
Email or memo asks staff for possible options to
remove the problem
Suggestions are tabulated and circulated to all
respondents
A meeting is called to discuss all possible options
Problem-solving meetings:
Problem, solution, benefit, action: this is
how problems are solved in business
world
In first step the major problem is
presented early in meeting
Then participants suggest solutions,
discussing and evaluating them
Participants arrive at a decision for
further action
Methods of solving problems in meetings:
BACKGROUND ANALYSIS:
State the Problem or Question in an
Affirmative tone
Define and Limit the Problem by
definitions of the terms used e.g. what do
you mean by „personnel‟ and who do
they include in terms of your question?
Collect facts on the History of the
Problem:
How long the problem has existed?
Describe the symptoms, causes and
effects of the problem?
How do other companies handle the
problem?
SOLUTION DISCOVERY:
Establish Criteria: fairness, workability,
acceptability, positive consequences,
favorable costs, number of people
impacted, and return on investment
For example, criteria for alternative energy:
The solution should have little impact on the
earnings per share
The supply of energy must be adequate
(favorable) for the future
SOLUTION DISCOVERY Contd.
List Possible Solutions:
brainstorm and make a list of the
possible solutions
The list of solutions should be shortened
according to the criteria decided upon
previously
SOLUTION EVALUATION:
Solutions evaluated in light of specific
criteria
pros and cons of the solutions should be
discussed
The reasons for choosing the solution
discussed for example,
What will be the consequences of
adopting one of the tentative solutions?
Choice of action: Recommendation for
action is given at the end. Hence
Background analysis
Solution discovery
Solution evaluation
Choice of action
All meetings have some kind of opening
analysis, spend considerable time reviewing
options, and end with recommendation
One must know the various leadership
styles in order to lead a group through
the intricate process of resolving an issue
The three main styles of leadership are as
follows:
Authoritarian: shows contempt for others,
dominates the discussion, issues orders
and commands
Leaderless: the leader delegates all
direction and decision making steps to
others.
This style is about shared leadership,
allowing high-ability people to run the
meeting
But there is need for guidance to arrive
at decisions
Democratic or participative: this style
encourages all points of view to be
heard
The group has the final authority
Productive group discussions are
encouraged, minority opinions heard
unsupported generalizations evaluated,
and vague statements are clarified
As a group leader you should consider
the following planning steps before a
meeting:
Review the problem and determine the
precise purpose
It should be written in the infinitive:
For example: to decide whether the
regional office should be shifted to
Lahore
Decide who should participate
Ideally a small group of 3 to 5 people is
more harmonious and effective
Often a small group drafts some
preliminary information and lays out
some options before going to a larger
group
Arrange for meeting date, time and
place
Be exact about time and date
Avoid Friday afternoon. Generally
Tuesday to Thursday are desirable
Be precise as to location.
Inform beforehand about any changes
in location
Create an agenda
The questions to be asked in the meeting
can be categorized as:
Fact questions: the five Ws and an H
Value questions: For example, about
fairness or unfairness of a policy
Policy or Procedure questions: for
example What measures to take? Who
should carry out the decision?
Distribute the announcement for the
meeting:
You should send out the announcement
for the meeting
Agenda items can serve as a major
portion of the call to the meeting
Check on physical arrangements
Select the seating pattern
Determine what kind of materials are
needed in the room
Have available the usual electronic
visual aids
Begin with an opening statement:
State the problem
Indicate importance of problem
Suggest issues
Use a quotation
State cause for discussion
Stimulate Discussion
By encouraging all to participate and
eliciting their views
Asking questions
Get the participants to analyze their own
thinking and that of others
Keep an atmosphere of goodwill and
cooperation.
Understand the roles of the participants
Group task roles: these roles can be
played by anyone, even the chairperson
Group task roles: Initiator-contributor,
Coordinator, information seeking,
opinion seeker, opinion giver, energizer
etc.
Group Building and Maintenance Roles:
these roles demand a group-centered
approach
Encourager, Harmonizer, group observer,
compromiser etc.
“Individual” Roles: the emphasis here is
on self-oriented roles
The roles are: Aggressor, Blocker,
Dominator, recognition seeker etc.
Interpret Data for Solution Evaluation
evaluate the advantages and
disadvantages
State the Major Conclusions and Plan of
Action and individual responsible for
each action
Indicate the due date
Follow up after the meeting through
minutes and the paper trail
The Reticent, Nonparticipating member:
ask him questions, encourage him to
give some information he is sure to know,
thank and praise him
The “Know-it-all”: ask him to justify every
statement he makes, ask others to
comment, ask for a show of hands from
others to support majority opinion
The Long- winded Speaker: Thank him
politely when he is at the end of a
sentence, and move to someone else or
to some highly important point
The Erroneous Member: Politely correct
this person‟s error by pointing out
something about the group but do not
criticize him directly
The Angry Conferee: turn off the angry,
abusive conferee by a calm
understanding, direct the question to
another conferee
Prepare for meetings by doing your
homework, collecting information,
checking your data, and confirming your
conclusions
Organizer: meetings often move without
direction, an organizer can give
procedural suggestions, and steer the
group back to main, central issues
Clarifier: this person clarifies
misunderstandings, attempts to make
clear unclear expressions and ideas
Questioner: questions can help fill
knowledge gap, but questions should be
vital not inconsequential
Factual Contributor: presents facts in a
non-aggressive and non-arrogant tone
Energizer: this person gives hope to the
group when things get stuck during the
meeting
Idea Creator: risks new, different ideas.
He/she is willing to test the new ideas in
the meetings
Critical Tester: Challenges ideas tactfully
for validity and reasonableness
He/she checks for sufficient number of
facts, consistent information, clear
language, reliable sources/statistics,
verifiable evidence, any omitted data
Conciliator: helps find the middle ground
when there are too many disagreements
He/she seeks to find compromise
Helper of others: helps those less efficient
or hesitant to participate in meetings
Tact, sensitivity, and cooperativeness
with the chairperson characterize this
role
Related docs
Other docs by asimhashmi11
Get documents about "