Embed
Email

Historical-Comparative Research - publish.uwo.ca publish.uwo.ca

Document Sample

Shared by: dfhdhdhdhjr
Categories
Tags
Stats
views:
0
posted:
1/15/2012
language:
pages:
16
Historical-Comparative

Research

Neuman and Robson Ch. 14

Value of Historical Research



 It throws light on present and future trends.



 It enables understanding of and solutions to

contemporary problems to be sought in the past.



 It can illuminate the effects of key interactions within a

culture or sub-culture.



 It allows for the revaluation of data in relation to

selected hypotheses, theories and generalizations that

are presently held about the past and the present.

Steps in a Historical-Comparative

Research Project



 1. Conceptualization of an idea, topic, or

research question

 2. Locate evidence and do background

literature review

 3. Evaluate evidence

 4. Organize evidence

 5. Synthesize evidence and develop general

explanatory model

 6. Develop a narrative exposition of the

findings

Data Sources





 Primary Sources:

 first-hand or eyewitness observations of

phenomenon

 Secondary Sources:

 second-hand observation, i.e. the author collected

the data from eyewitnesses.

 Running Records

 Statistics, gov’t data

 Recollections

What is Oral History?



 Video clip:

 The Oral History Research Method

Oral History

 Oral history interviewing is valuable for history,

anthropology, and folklore.

 Collects information about the past from observers

and participants in that past.

 Gathers data not available in written records about

events, people, decisions, and processes.

 Can show how individual values and actions shaped

the past, and how the past shapes present-day

values and actions.

 Methodological problem:

 Oral history interviews are grounded in memory, and

memory is a subjective instrument for recording the past,

always shaped by the present moment and the individual

psyche.

Why Collect Oral Histories?

 Listen to Ann Nixon Cooper (104 years old)

and her recollections of the American south

and “the Jim Crow days”

Evaluating Sources





 External Criticism:

 Appraises the authenticity and authorship of the

data source





 Internal Criticism:

 Appraises the meaning and intent of the data

source

Types Of Historical Research





 A. Historical Events Research

 examines particular events or processes that

occurred over short spans of time

 Methodological problems

 Meanings may have changed

 Information may not be complete

Types (cont.)



 B. Historical Process Research

 focus on how and why a series of events unfolded

over some period of time

 Methodological problems:

 May place too much emphasis on the actions and

decisions of particular actors

 Not always clear which example represents general

pattern

 definitions may change over time

 relies on long-term records and archives

Types (cont.)



 C. Cross-Sectional Comparative Research

 comparing two or more social settings or groups

(usually countries) at one particular point in time

 Methodological problems:

 comparability of measures across countries

Types (cont.)

 D. Comparative Historical Research

 combines historical process research

and cross-sectional comparative research

 To understand causal processes at work within

particular groups and to identify general historical

patterns across groups

 Methodological problems:

 history has not been recorded accurately or reliably

 difficult to know how to deal with exceptions

 difficult to conclude that one factor (and not others) is

what causes some outcome

 groups being compared may not be independent

(Galton’s Problem)

Equivalence in Historical

Research



 How can we make comparisons across

diverse contexts (both in time and

geography)?

 Lexicon equivalence

 Contextual equivalence

 Conceptual equivalence

 Measurement equivalence

Weaknesses of Historical Method



 1. Bias in interpreting historical sources.

 2. Interpreting sources is very time

consuming.

 3. Sources of historical materials may be

problematic

 4. Lack of control over external variables

Strengths of Historical Method



 1. The historical method is unobtrusive

 2. The historical method is well suited for

trend analysis.

 3. There is no possibility of researcher-

subject interaction.

Interesting Internet Sites on

Historical Research

 Multimedia History Tutorials at U. of Calgary

http://www.ucalgary.ca/applied_history/tutor/

 Where To Do Historical Research (Links)

http://www.wheretodoresearch.com/History.htm

 History On-Line

http://www.ihrinfo.ac.uk/search/welcome.html

 University of Washington History Site

http://www.lib.washington.edu/subject/History/

 Oral History Digital Collection Youngstown State U.

http://www.maag.ysu.edu/oralhistory/oral_hist.html

 Oral History Project List Columbia University

http://www.columbia.edu/cu/lweb/indiv/oral/projects.html



Related docs
Other docs by dfhdhdhdhjr
Creative Vision Quilt
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Harnesses - Petzl
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
GYSA PARENT EDUCATION PROGRAM
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Evaluating Athletics.ppt - brannockpe
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Hydroelectric Power - Backwell School E-Mail
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
By registering with docstoc.com you agree to our
privacy policy

You are almost ready to download!

You are almost ready to download!