RELIABILITY TEST Q1, 2009 Rev. 1 PLX TECHNOLOGY QUARTERLY

PLX TECHNOLOGY QUARTERLY MONITOR REPORT RELIABILITY TEST Q1, 2009: Rev. 1 PROCESS TECHNOLOGY MATRIX FOUNDRY FAB TSMC, Taiwan Seiko Epson, Japan NEC, Japan PROCESS TECHNOLOGIES 0.09, 0.13, 0.18, 0.25, 0.35, 0.50 μm CMOS 0.35 and 0.6 μm, CMOS 0.15, 0.25, 0.35 μm CMOS DIE RELIABILITY DATA OUTLINE HTOL (IFR/EFR) ASSEMBLY SUBCON ASE, Kaohsiung ASE, Malaysia NEC, Japan Seiko-Epson, Japan STATS ChiPAC, Korea STATS ChiPAC, Singapore UTAC, Singapore PACKAGE TECHNOLOGIES PBGA, HSBGA, FCBGA PQFP, PBGA, HSBGA PQFP, PBGA, FBGA PQFP, PBGA HSBGA PQFP PQFP, EPQFP PACKAGE RELIABILITY DATA OUTLINE TCT THBT/HAST PCT RELIABILITY HTOL DATA @125 °C FOUNDRY: TSMC Taiwan, Process: 0.09 µm Low-K CMOS EFR (Early Fail Rate,=< 168 Hours) YEAR Sample # Failure PPM FITs @ 60% CL, 55C, Ea = 0.7eV Sample Cum Dev # Failure FITs Q1,08 Q2,08 Q3,08 Q4,08 Q1,09 120 120 120 120 120 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 120 120 120 120 120 60,000 210,000 330,000 450,000 570,000 0 0 1* 0 0 196 56 79 58 46 Note: *=1 unit damaged during failure analysis, root cause could not be determined, random failure. EFR(Early Fail Rate, =<168 Hours) 1 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 IFR(Intrinsic Fail Rate,>168 Hours) Cumulative 250 200 FIT 150 100 50 0 Q1,08 Q2,08 Q3,08 Year Q4,08 Q1,09 PPM Year RELIABILITY HTOL DATA @125 °C FOUNDRY: TSMC Taiwan, Process: 0.13 µm LVCMOS EFR (Early Fail Rate,=< 168 Hours) YEAR Sample # Failure PPM FITs @ 60% CL, 55C, Ea = 0.7eV Sample Cum Dev # Failure FITs 2005 2006 Q1,07 Q2,07 Q4,07 Q1,08 Q2,08 Q3,08 Q4,08 Q1,09 499 1200 360 240 120 120 120 119 120 120 1* 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 499 1199 360 240 120 120 120 119 120 120 359,500 1,107,800 1,467,800 1,607,960 1,727,960 1,787,960 1,847,960 1,966,960 2,086,960 2,206,960 0 1** 0 0 0 0 0 1*** 0 0 25 11 8 7 7 7 6 13 12 12 Note: * = invalid reject at 168 hrs due to EOS ** = invalid reject due to mechanical damage after 1000 hrs ***=1 unit functional failure, root cause could not be determined, random failure. EFR(Early Fail Rate, =<168 Hours) 1 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 IFR(Intrinsic Fail Rate,>168 Hours) Cumulative 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Q2,07 Q4,07 Q1,08 Q2,08 Q3,08 Q4,08 Q1,09 PPM PM FIT T Year Year RELIABILITY HTOL DATA @125 °C FOUNDRY: NEC Japan, Process: 0.15 µm CMOS EFR (Early Fail Rate,=< 168 Hours) YEAR Sample # Failure PPM FITs @ 60% CL, 55C, Ea = 0.7eV Sample Cum Dev # Failure FITs 2000-2007 Q1,08 Q2,08 Q3,08 Q4,08 Q1,09 Note: 1366 120 120 96 96 72 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1366 120 120 96 96 72 1366000 1486000 1606000 1654000 1702000 1774000 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 8 7 7 7 7 EFR(Early Fail Rate, =<168 Hours) 1 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 IFR(Intrinsic Fail Rate,>168 Hours) Cumulative 8.2 8 7.8 7.6 7.4 7.2 7 6.8 6.6 6.4 Q1,08 Q2,08 Q3,08 Year Q4,08 Q1,09 PPM Year FIT RELIABILITY HTOL DATA @125 °C FOUNDRY: TSMC Taiwan, Process: 0.18 µm CMOS EFR (Early Fail Rate,=< 168 Hours) YEAR Sample # Failure PPM FITs @ 60% CL, 55C, Ea = 0.7eV Sample Cum Dev # Failure FITs 2005 2006 Q1,07 Q2,07 Q3,07 Q4,07 Q1,08 Q2,08 Q3,08 Q4,08 Q1,09 480 480 120 120 119 120 120 120 120 120 120 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 480 479 120 120 119 120 120 120 120 120 120 838,168 1,314,668 1,434,668 1,554,668 1,653,676 1,773,676 1,833,676 2,013,676 2,133,676 2,253,676 2,373,676 0 1* 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 20 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 12 11 Note: * =1 unit functional failure, root cause could not be determined, random failure. EFR(Early Fail Rate, =<168 Hours) 1 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 05 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 IFR(Intrinsic Fail Rate,>168 Hours) Cumulative 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Q2,07 Q3,07 Q4,07 Q1,08 Q2,08 Q3,08 Q4,08 Q1,09 PPM M FIT T Year Year RELIABILITY HTOL DATA @125 °C FOUNDRY: TSMC Taiwan, Process: 0.25 µm CMOS EFR (Early Fail Rate,=< 168 Hours) YEAR Sample # Failure PPM FITs @ 60% CL, 55C, Ea = 0.7eV Sample Cum Dev # Failure FITs 2005 2006 Q1,07 Q2,07 Q3,07 Q4,07 Q1,08 Q2,08 Q3,08 Q1,08 480 480 120 119 120 120 120 120 100 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0**** 0**** 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 477 480 120 119 111 120 120 120 100 100 1,138,096 1,528,096 1,587,764 1,675,264 1,786,246 1,906,264 1,966,264 2,026,264 2,126,264 2,226,264 3* 0 0 1* 9** 0 0 1*** 0**** 0**** 10 7 7 7 7 6 6 13 12 12 Note: * = mechanical damage after 500 hrs ** = 9 mechanical damage after 1KH ***= 1 unit functional failure after 1000 hrs, root cause could not be determined, random failure. ****= TSMC Process HTOL Reliability Data. EFR(Early Fail Rate, =<168 Hours) 1 0.9 0.8 07 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 IFR(Intrinsic Fail Rate,>168 Hours) Cumulative 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Q2,07 Q3,07 Q4,07 Q1,08 Q2,08 Q3,08 Q1,08 PPM FIT Year Year RELIABILITY HTOL DATA @125 °C FOUNDRY: Seiko-Epson Japan, Process: 0.35 µm CMOS EFR (Early Fail Rate,=< 168 Hours) YEAR Sample # Failure PPM FITs @ 60% CL, 55C, Ea = 0.7eV Sample Cum Dev # Failure FITs 2003 2004 2005 2006 Q1,07 Q2,07 Q1,08 Q2,08 Q3,08 Q4,08 Note: 315 450 225 225 45 66 44 132 22 44 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 315 450 225 225 45 66 44 132 22 44 240,120 734,230 914,240 1,071,240 1,093,740 1,104,740 1,126,740 1,214,740 1,225,740 1,269,740 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 16 13 11 11 11 10 10 10 9 EFR(Early Fail Rate, =<168 Hours) 1 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 IFR(Intrinsic Fail Rate,>168 Hours) Cumulative 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Q2,07 Q1,08 Q2,08 Q3,08 Q4,08 PPM FIT Year Year RELIABILITY STRESS DATA Temperature Cycle Test >=500 Cycles, -65/+150 ˚C YEAR PKG TYPE SAMPLE SIZE 500 cycles FAILURE RATE (%) FINAL RESULT (PASS/FAIL) Q1,08 Q2,08 Q3,08 Q4,08 Q1,09 Q1,08 Q2,08 Q3,08 Q4,08 Q1,09 2004 2005 2006 Q1,07 Q2,07 Q3,07 Q4,07 Q1,08 Q2,08 Q3,08 Q4,08 Q1,09 2004 2005 2006 Q2,07 Q3,07 Q4,07 Q1,08 Q2,08 Q3,08 Q4,08 Q1,09 Note: H/FCBGA H/FCBGA H/FCBGA H/FCBGA H/FCBGA HSBGA HSBGA HSBGA HSBGA HSBGA PBGA PBGA PBGA PBGA PBGA PBGA PBGA PBGA PBGA PBGA PBGA PBGA QFP QFP QFP QFP QFP QFP QFP QFP QFP QFP QFP 45 45 90 90 180 135 120 120 90 270 993 1158 1347 390 270 270 405 480 525 480 300 270 318 428 375 180 132 150 252 140 184 75 120 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS ASSEMBLY SUBCON ASE, Kaohsiung ASE, Malaysia NEC Seiko-Epson, Japan STATSChiPAC, Korea STATSChiPAC, Singapore UTAC, Singapore PACKAGE TECHNOLOGIES PBGA, HSBGA, FCBGA PQFP, PBGA, HSBGA PQFP, PBGA, FBGA PQFP, PBGA HSBGA PQFP PQFP, EPQFP RELIABILITY STRESS DATA Temperature Humidity Test 85/85 or HAST YEAR PKG TYPE SAMPLE SIZE FAILURE RATE (%) FINAL RESULT (PASS/FAIL) Q1,08 Q2,08 Q3,08 Q4,08 Q1,09 Q1,08 Q2,08 Q3,08 Q4,08 Q1,09 2004 2005 2006 Q1,07 Q2,07 Q3,07 Q4,07 Q1,08 Q2,08 Q3,08 Q4,08 Q1,09 2004 2005 2006 Q2,07 Q1,08 Q2,08 Q3,08 Q4,08 Q1,09 H/FCBGA H/FCBGA H/FCBGA H/FCBGA H/FCBGA HSBGA HSBGA HSBGA HSBGA HSBGA PBGA PBGA PBGA PBGA PBGA PBGA PBGA PBGA PBGA PBGA PBGA PBGA QFP Q QFP QFP QFP QFP QFP QFP QFP QFP 45 45 90 90 180 135 120 120 90 270 983 1114 1870 90 270 360 360 480 525 480 300 270 245 1324 706 30 186 96 118 75 75 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS Note: Conditions for 85/85 are 1000 Hours, 85C, 85%RH. HAST is an alternative stress with conditions of 96 Hours, 130C, 85%RH. ASSEMBLY SUBCON ASE, Kaohsiung ASE, Malaysia NEC Seiko-Epson, Japan STATSChiPAC, Korea STATSChiPAC, Singapore UTAC, Singapore PACKAGE TECHNOLOGIES PBGA, HSBGA, FCBGA PQFP, PBGA, HSBGA PQFP, PBGA, FBGA PQFP, PBGA HSBGA PQFP PQFP, EPQFP RELIABILITY STRESS DATA Pressure Cooker Test: 168 Hours, 121 ˚C/ 100% RH YEAR PKG TYPE SAMPLE SIZE 96 Hours ( Ref ) 168 Hours ( Accep ) FAILURE RATE (%) FINAL RESULT (PASS/FAIL) Q1,08 Q2,08 Q3,08 2004 2005 2006 Q2,07 Q1,08 Q2,08 Q3,08 Q4,08 Q1,09 2004 2005 2006 Q1,07 Q2,07 Q3,07 Q4,07 Q1,08 Q2,08 Q3,08 Q4,08 Q1,09 Note: HSBGA HSBGA HSBGA PBGA PBGA PBGA PBGA PBGA PBGA PBGA PBGA PBGA QFP QFP QFP QFP QFP QFP QFP QFP QFP QFP QFP QFP 90 30 30 128 830 142 30 30 30 30 30 30 623 980 3794 150 360 390 495 120 140 184 30 75 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS ASSEMBLY SUBCON ASE, Kaohsiung ASE, Malaysia NEC Seiko-Epson, Japan STATSChiPAC, Korea STATSChiPAC, Singapore UTAC, Singapore PACKAGE TECHNOLOGIES PBGA, HSBGA, FCBGA PQFP, PBGA, HSBGA PQFP, PBGA, FBGA PQFP, PBGA HSBGA PQFP PQFP, EPQFP

Related docs
PLX Technology 2006 Annual Report
Views: 241  |  Downloads: 3
QUARTERLY RELIABILITY REPORT April, 2009
Views: 36  |  Downloads: 0
NASA GA aircraft reliability
Views: 899  |  Downloads: 68
Reliability Report 48 Q2 2009
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Exar Quarterly Quality and Reliability Report
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
RELIABILITY TEST
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Reliability White Paper FINAL 505
Views: 160  |  Downloads: 3
ESTIMATE RELIABILITY,
Views: 32  |  Downloads: 3
Reliability Test Report For AX3104
Views: 2  |  Downloads: 1
Power system reliability
Views: 246  |  Downloads: 18
Other docs by TylerShoemaker
dv120c
Views: 124  |  Downloads: 0
Baker v Allied Supermarket
Views: 221  |  Downloads: 0
Glidden v Szybiak
Views: 203  |  Downloads: 0
Perrin_Evidence
Views: 347  |  Downloads: 29
dv108
Views: 156  |  Downloads: 0
Italian Food Terms Glossary
Views: 2975  |  Downloads: 60
dv110c
Views: 141  |  Downloads: 0
Joint check payment agreement
Views: 358  |  Downloads: 8
Duty
Views: 702  |  Downloads: 10
Civil Procedure -- Lynn
Views: 586  |  Downloads: 35
Timely completion
Views: 231  |  Downloads: 3
Leasehold Estates
Views: 343  |  Downloads: 3
It is Well with My Soul
Views: 289  |  Downloads: 1
You Have Been Good
Views: 260  |  Downloads: 0
dv250
Views: 101  |  Downloads: 0