Embed
Email

Documents

Document Sample

Shared by: jianghongl
Categories
Tags
Stats
views:
49
posted:
1/11/2012
language:
pages:
13
Click Here & Upgrade

Expanded Features

PDF Unlimited Pages

Documents

Complete









INTERNATIONAL ORGANISATION FOR

MIGRATION

IOM–UPU-PAPU PILOT PROJECT



EXECUTIVE SUMMARY





“SUPPORTING AN AFFORDABLE ELECTRONIC REMITTANCE

TRANSFER SYSTEM BETWEEN TANZANIA AND UGANDA”









Submitted to IOM Dar es Salaam Office by

Dr H.Bohela Lunogelo

lunogelo@yahoo.co.uk



06 NOVEMBER 2009

Click Here & Upgrade

Expanded Features

PDF Unlimited Pages

Documents

Complete





Meaning of Key Terminologies Used in this Report

A “migrant” as used in this report implies a person who has crossed national borders to live

in another country for work, study or asylum. It is a narrower definition compared to the

general definition of a migrant as an “individual who has changed her place of residence

either by crossing an international border or by moving within her country origin to another

region, district or municipality” (UNDP, 2009). This report does not consider the dynamics

of internal migrants and domestic transfers of income.



“Remittance” as used in this report implies income earned by a migrant and sent back

home. It is different from normal investment income remitted by companies operating in a

foreign country to their base or home country.



“Remittance Agents” as used in this report imply institutions or individuals offering

services to transfer remittances made by the migrant to their home countries or elsewhere or

nationals to foreign lands. They can be banks or non-banks, formal or informal agents.



“Remittance System” as used in this report implies a combination of procedures and

institutional setup used to facilitate the transfer of income by a migrant from one country to

another (although it can also apply to domestic remittance).









Page 2

Click Here & Upgrade

Expanded Features

PDF Unlimited Pages

Documents

Complete



EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

I. Background

Studies conducted by individual researchers and institutions such as the United Nations

Development Programme (UNDP), World Bank (WB), International Fund for Agricultural

Development (IFAD), International Labour Organisation (ILO) and the International

Organisation for Migration (IOM) provide ample evidence that migrants can contribute to

the development agenda of their home countries through remittances, transfer of

professional skills and links to private investments (UNDP, 2009; WB, 2006). It is estimated

that the African Diaspora consists of more than 30 million individuals living outside their

countries of origin. These migrants jointly send about USD 40 billion in remittances back

home each year (IFAD 2009). There are usually transmission costs incurred by the different

remittance channels selected by the migrant for sending money home.



The interest of the International Organization for Migration (IOM) on remittances for

development and the need to reduce transmission costs comes from its mandated

responsibility to ensure that migrants not only live a decent life but also contribute to the

economic development of both the originating and hosting countries. On the other hand, the

Universal Postal Union (UPU) and the Pan African Postal Union (PAPU) wanted to

understand required operational improvements after installing the International Financial

System (IFS) for improving funds transfer between Post Offices in Tanzania and Uganda.



II. The Study Objectives and Methodology

Objectives

The study was undertaken to provide in-depth assessment of the nature and extent of

remittances between Tanzania and Uganda and the role of remittances in the development

agenda of these two countries. The analysis of how remittances are undertaken involved

formal remittance agents such as the Postal Offices, Postal Banks, Western Union™ and

Commercial Banks; but also informal agents (buses, letter couriers, boarder agents etc.); as

well as custodians of policies and laws (ministries, departments and agents). The study has

identified success areas that require consolidation, revealed some gaps to be filled and

shown some new opportunities for further improvement of funds remittance between

Tanzania and Uganda. The findings have also been used to prepare some training material

for a capacity-building workshop of relevant officials from ministries, departments and

agencies (including post office) on the importance of migrants and remittances in

development.

Study Methodology

The study involved a desk review of the global and regional phenomenon of migration and

remittance as well as of the operations of IOM and UPU in addition to the field interviews

and stakeholder consultations. Planning consultations involved meetings with officials of

UPU and the Postal Corporations in Dar es Salaam and Kampala, which allowed insights on

the criteria for purposeful selection of study districts in each country considered to have a

high prevalence of remittances. The 16 districts covered for the study were Masaka,

Mbarara, Kabale, Kabarole, Jinja, Iganga, Mbale and Kampala (in Uganda) and Bukoba,

Page 3

Click Here & Upgrade

Expanded Features

PDF Unlimited Pages

Documents

Complete



Karagwe, Muleba, Geita, Mwanza, Musoma, Arumeru/Arusha and Kinondoni (in

Tanzania).



Information and views on policy, legislations and institutional arrangements supportive of

the welfare of migrants and the operation of an efficient remittance system was obtained

from officials interviewed in 14 national level and 16 district-level institutions responsible

for communication, international affairs, and labour/Diaspora, fiscal/monetary

management and national statistics. On the other hand, information and data on systems

used for transmission, amount of funds transmitted between Uganda and Tanzania,

transmission charges and the challenges faced by operators and customers was obtained

from 13 national-level and 16 district level agencies and institutions responsible for

remitting money between the two countries. These included official agencies such as the

Post Offices, Postal Banks and other Commercial Banks based in Dar es Salaam and

Kampala. Operators of courier (document and parcels) companies were also interviewed.

Informal or unofficial agents included operators of buses plying between Dar es Salaam and

Kampala and eight (8) informal agents at Mutukula border post. Separate interviews were

conducted for migrants (Tanzanians in Uganda and vice versa) to capture their views on the

suitability of different remittance systems, amount of funds they normally transact and the

economic dimension of the remittances. Overall views were obtained from 91 people in the

public institutions, commercial banks and agencies; and (iii) 133 individual migrants in

Uganda (56) and Tanzania (77) with experience of sending or receiving money to and from

their home country.



Table 1. Overview of stakeholders included in the study.

Sn Category of Uganda Tanzania Comments

Stakeholders Plan Actual Plan Actual

Institutions Institutions People Institutions People

1. Policy and Legal Custodians

(a) National 5 8 13 5 6 10 Above

level target

(b) District level 8 16 12 8 16 8 On target

2. Remittance Agents/

Institutions

(a) Official 5 5 13 5 8 10 Above

National target

(b) Official- 8 8 8 8 8 8 On target

District

(c) Unofficial 4 5 On target

District-

Border

3. Migrants 80 56 80 77 In Tanzania

below target

by 3 people

Summary: Total



Institutions visited 29 30 59



People in Institutions 50 41 91







Page 4

Click Here & Upgrade

Expanded Features

PDF Unlimited Pages

Documents

Complete



Sn Category of Uganda Tanzania Comments

Stakeholders Plan Actual Plan Actual

Institutions Institutions People Institutions People

Migrants Interviewed 80 77 157



Source: Field Notes of the SRC and Annex 2, Annex 4 and Annex 5.



III. Key Findings on Policy and Legal Custodians

The financial and communication laws of both countries allows officially registered banking

institutions (e.g. deposit taking and lending commercial banks including Postal Bank) and

non-banking financial institutions (e.g. Post Offices, dedicated Remittance Companies such

as Western Union and MoneyGram and Bureaus de Change) to receive and send customer

funds transmitted across borders provided the daily transactions reported to the Central

Banks. However, the laws of Tanzania do not yet allow free movement of investment funds

(e.g. Tanzanians investing outside the country) as part of capital account controls. Laws of

both countries prohibit courier companies and buses/lorries to transport valuables and

money within and across borders. As part of controlling money laundering remittance

agents in both countries are required to gather enough personal identification of both the

sender and the recipient. The non-banking agents are also required to set ceilings of funds

that can be transmitted per person per day, with Tanzania’s threshold set at USD 200, while

in Uganda is USD 10,000. This means a customer in Tanzania intending to send USD 2,000

has to undertake 10 transactions over a period of 10 days, with associated costs per

transaction. There have been some positive developments in use of mobile telephones for

domestic money transfer. Unfortunately both countries had not passed legislation to permit

cross border transfer of funds using mobile phones. This means there are two channels for

remittance of funds that are relatively friend to low-income residents of these two countries,

which are not legally sanctioned. In both countries, and especially for Tanzania, there is lack

of an institutional arrangement to systematically collect and report on remittance data,

rendering it difficult to make a confident estimate of level of remittance by migrants.



IV. Key Findings on Formal Remittance Agents



(a) Post Offices under the Uganda and Tanzania Postal Corporations



The postal corporations in each of the two countries have the widest network of outreach,

providing postal and financial services at levels below the district headquarters in rural

areas, in 2008 amounting to about 422 and 273 in Tanzania and Uganda, respectively. Of

course despite the relatively large number the number of people served per post office was

about 94,000 people. However, those providing financial services even less, about 260 in

Tanzania, thus each serving about 153,000 people. Post offices which were fully connected

to stable electronic system of money transfer in Tanzania were only 14 in 2008, each serving

an equivalent of 2.8 million people. This means people have to travel long distances to

access postal services. Money transfer services offered to any customer by post offices

includes Postal Orders (equivalent of travellers’ cheques), Money Order, Express Money

Order, Money Fax and Expedited Mail Service (EMS) Money Fax. Post Giro, for payment of

salaries and pensions is a financial service offered only to customers with bank accounts.



Page 5

Click Here & Upgrade

Expanded Features

PDF Unlimited Pages

Documents

Complete



All the mentioned services are for domestic transfers only. For cross border transfers within

East Africa the Interstate Money Order (IMO) is available. The post offices are also agents of

Western Union Money Transfer (WUMT) system, a private international venture, which has

gained popularity in East Africa. WUMT is operated by other agents besides the post offices

in the same locations. Customers entering a post office have therefore a choice of using

services belonging to the post office or the privately owned WUMT, who have installed an

exclusive electronic transfer software and system. In response to the need to have own

electronic funds transfer system the International Financial System (IFS) was introduced in

2006 as explained below.



International Financial System (IFS)



A third version of the software is in use in both countries, which has some improvements

that allows domestic money transfers between regions and districts, a feature that lacked in

the earlier versions. The following are main observations with respect to the IFS, as

introduced by UPU:



• Technical Aspects of IFS: The IFS is basically an extensive web-based network connecting

post offices worldwide for international electronic fund transfer exchanges. The IFS

comprises two applications: the IFS software and STEFI (Secured Transfer of Electronic

Financial Information software)1. STEFI is an information technology pipeline that

enables Postal Offices already equipped with electronic data management system to

establish access points to the IFS network. The IFS is designed to be an adaptable and

user-friendly low cost tool that can be installed even in the remotest areas of the world. It

can operate under internet speed as low as 256 kbps to as high as 2 mbps2. UPU provides

direct support for countries linked to the IFS network via UPU’s headquarters in Berne,

Switzerland and through five regional support centres, which includes Dar es Salaam.



• International and domestic roll-out and presence of IFS in Tanzania and Uganda: The

Uganda Postal Corporation had already taken advantage of the new features of version 3

of IFS software to connect Kampala with district post offices for domestic transfers in

addition to international transfers, including Dar es Salaam. The use of the system in

Tanzania until August 2009 was still limited to transactions between Dar es Salaam and

Kampala, among other international destinations. Plans were underway in Tanzania to

configure the system for domestic transfers by October 2009, at least to those towns with

public infrastructural facilities for electronic transmission of funds. However, even if the

software had been installed in the regions/districts, the software has since its

introduction experienced several technical hiccups, sometimes stopping operations for

more than two weeks. It appears that a combination of lack or poor infrastructural

facilities to roll out the programme upcountry and operational hitches for the already





1 The STEFI software is lighter than the IFS software but fulfils the basic tasks of the IFS e.g.

monitored and secured low-cost transfer services of cash to cash, cash to account, account to account

and account to cash.

2 Data transfer speed is measured in bytes per second (bps), thus kbps=kilo bps and mbps=mega bps.



Page 6

Click Here & Upgrade

Expanded Features

PDF Unlimited Pages

Documents

Complete



linked nodes, have not encouraged the Postal Offices to invest in marketing and

advertising the suitability of IFS as a dependable remittance system. Another equally

important factor is the presence of Western Union™, which is operated on agency basis

by post offices and has gained popularity as a preferred system for international transfers

in the absence of reliable substitutes for ordinary customers. It seemed that unless IFS

proves itself as a dependable system in both reliability and geographical spread, post

office staff will continue operating as agents of the privately owned Western Union™ in

order to effectively serve the needs of customers. This is somehow an unfortunate

situation since by its design IFS is supposed to be cheaper compared to other products,

and has the potential to reach widely and to remote parts, rivalled only by the advent of

Mobile Banking. For example, while it would cost a minimum of USD 50 to send money

through a normal bank transfer or USD 25 through the Western Union™ system, the

minimum for IFS is less than USD 5. This shows that the IFS service is better suited to

serve low income customers than the other money transfer products.

(b) Commercial Banks and their International Money Transfer Systems

All commercial banks, including the Postal Banks (Uganda and Tanzania) had two

categories of remittance handing systems. The first type of system is a set of own bank-

specific products meant for their customers, most of them linked to the System for

Worldwide Information for Funds Transfer (SWIFT) for international settlements with

other banks or internal system for inter-branch transfers and payments (within and

across borders). The second category of services is that offered to non-account holders.

So far banks have subscribed as agents of franchise such as Western Union,

MoneyGram, Visa, MasterCard, etc. Western Union and MoneyGram is the most

popular among non-account holders. In both countries the Postal Banks are the main

agents for Western Union while in Tanzania the national agency for MoneyGram is held

by Exim Bank.



The interviewed bank managers confided that for all practical purposes, Western Union

and MoneyGram money transfer systems were the most ideal for customers who don’t

have operational accounts with banks. Given that the process of bank accounts required

several conditions to be fulfilled, and the fact that the bank service might be needed only

a few time in a year, the ideal option was for one to use the one-off transfer system,

which required simple identification of the sender and receiver without reference letters

and other referees as needed when opening a savings or current account. For that reason

the estimates of remittance levels are based mostly on funds handled through Western

Union which was given the Postal Banks who coordinated and monitored national

transactions.



Commercial Banks on Migrants’ Remittance



In recognition of the increasing role of the Diaspora in development, commercial banks

have tried to implement different services that intend to simplify the sending and

receiving of money by individuals and companies as exemplified below:









Page 7

Click Here & Upgrade

Expanded Features

PDF Unlimited Pages

Documents

Complete



a. Banks have opened corresponding or reciprocal accounts with sister banks in the

other country to allow a Tanzanian, for example, to immediately deposit money at

his/her Tanzanian bank account while in Kampala, thus remitting money to Tanzania.



b. Banks such as CRDB Bank Ltd in Dar es Salaam opened agencies in selected cities in

the United Kingdom and USA to simplify deposits by Tanzanian living abroad

(started with 500 and 200 customers, respectively). Other banks like the Commercial

Bank of Africa (CBA) have gone further to create special investment related products

tailored to suit the needs of Diaspora in need of investing back home. Most of these

members are investing in real estate for family and business purposes back in

Tanzania and Uganda.



c. The introduction of automated teller machine (ATM) system through debit card (e.g.

Visa Electron) and credit cards (e.g. MasterCard and Visa Card) have opened another

channel for fund transfers between Uganda and Tanzania. However, this service is

suitable for migrants with bank accounts, since most of the ordinary (low income)

migrants do not hold such accounts.



Bureaux de Change



d. Bureaux de Changes have also introduced fast money transfer systems between

Kampala and Dar es Salaam, only. This system has proved to be especially popular

among traders in Dar es Salaam, who go to buy merchandise in Kampala. The cost

imputed in the exchange rate difference, which varies between 1.5-2% of the funds

remitted.



(c) Mobile Phone Banking

The use of Mobile Banking has been allowed to operate, provided the services are jointly

arranged under the supervision of a registered bank or financial institution to facilitate the

recording and reporting of transactions. This has created some partnerships with telephone

companies such as Zain (ZAP), Vodacom (M-Pesa), MTN and Safaricom (M-Pesa) with

banks such as Barclays, Standard Chartered, CRDB Bank, National Bank of Commerce (T)

and Kenya Commercial Bank (KCB). This new service is however still operated

domestically as legislation to allow cross-border payment using mobile phones had not

been enacted by October 2009.



V. Key Findings on Informal Remittance Agents

Migrants also used informal remittance systems to transfer funds, the most common one

being passenger buses and lorries, and use of acquaintances travelling to the destination of

funds. It also involved personal carrying of funds to the destination when going on leave or

for business. The main factors compelling migrants to use the informal system was the

relative safety of funds, cost effectiveness and reliability. It would appear that bus operators

had managed to create a delivery system that met all the three criteria, thus offering a

competitive alternative system to the official system. Unfortunately, data on funds sent by

bus companies was not kept by the transporters since the service is done illegally.





Page 8

Click Here & Upgrade

Expanded Features

PDF Unlimited Pages

Documents

Complete



(a) Road Transporters-Buses



The use of buses was mentioned as a popular means of remitting funds by 25.1% of the

interviewed Ugandan migrants in Tanzania, but only 11.7% of Tanzanians migrants in

Uganda use such system. The use of informal transmission system was more common along

the border districts because of the ease of physical movement of individuals. The procedure

used by bus operators is to get any form of identification of the sender or receiver, including

a telephone number. They seal the envelop and offer a secret password to be used for

identification of the recipient. The only setback of the system is lack of insurance in case of

accident or highway robbery, but then customers seem to minimise the risk by sending

small amounts at a time, mostly between USD 50 and USD200. Bus operators indicated that

since they were licensed to carry parcels and not money, they never recorded cash handled,

although they also cross-checked and maintained an informal record as part of validity

check. They could therefore officially only reveal the number of parcels and letters handled

but not the amount of money carried in a day.



Another finding along at the boarder districts was the usage of sex workers as money

transferors between the two countries. For a low fee, often lower than those of other

informal remittance agents, sex workers carried money from one side to another as they

crossed the border in search for clients at the other side.



(b) Courier Agents

Courier companies indicated some stricter observance of rules on cash handling because of

the mandatory declaration and inspection at border posts. On the other hand, the Kampala

post office’s EMS unit, for example, received about 1,353 parcels from Tanzania and sent

only 281 parcels to Tanzania in 2008. Although it is assumed that some might have put

money, mostly cheques, it not easy to estimate how much money is handled through this

system. However, as shown in the main report, more than two thirds of the cash transacted

between Tanzania and Uganda flowed from Tanzania to Uganda.



(c) Border Post Operators



Border post operators also provided an important role as money changers, where Tanzanian

shillings are converted into Uganda shillings and vice versa. They provided a useful money

changing service at competitive rates in the absence of registered banking and non-banking

financial institutions. The agents interviewed at Mutukula post were not willing to reveal

how much money they changed in a day.



VI. Mapping of Flow of Remittances Between Tanzania and Uganda



a) Official channel remittances: A general observation of secondary data provided by postal

banks and post offices shows a net flow of funds in favour of Uganda. The estimates in this

report are based on funds handled through services such as Western Union™ and the Postal

Office own IFS). For funds handled by the Postal Bank, for example, about 2.6 million USD

(in 2008) was sent to Uganda and 1.6 million USD (in 2008) from Uganda to Tanzania. This

includes funds handled through Western Union by all agents, which the Postal Bank



Page 9

Click Here & Upgrade

Expanded Features

PDF Unlimited Pages

Documents

Complete



monitors. The money handled is not from Ugandan migrants alone, but from Tanzanians

sending mostly to academic institutions in Uganda, meaning there are Tanzanian migrants

in schools and college who receive rather than send money back home. About 50% of

Tanzanian migrants interviewed in Uganda indicated they received money from Tanzania

for educational purposes.

Figure1. Comparison between incoming cash to Tanzania from Uganda and outgoing cash from

Tanzania to Uganda through the Postal Bank (source: own computations from unpublished

Tanzania Postal Bank raw data).









b) Informal channel remittances: It was revealed that on average each bus handles between

15-30 letters or small parcels per one way trip. Assuming that only one trip is made per day

and about 10 of those letters and parcels sent every trip contain some money, and assuming

that the amount is about USD 100 per letter, then about USD 1,000 is handled per day or

USD 30,000 per month per bus. If we assume 4 buses carry money that translates to USD

120,000 per month or USD 1.44 million per year. All the interviewed courier agents in

Kampala and Dar es Salaam explained that they could not risk concealing cash in their

courier bags because of the strict border custom inspections. They however conceded that it

was possible for someone to send cheques and register them as document but the value sent

is never is recorded.



Table 2. Factors Considered by Migrants When Sending Money

Factors Considered in Sending Tanzania Uganda Average

Money n=77 n=56 N=133

Safety of funds 58.40% 28% 43.20%

Cost effectiveness of sending 53.20% 21.40% 37.30%

Speed and reliability 40.30% 12.90% 26.60%



VII. Developmental Dimension of the Remittances

An interesting dimension of remittances between Uganda and Tanzania is the fact that 50%

of the money received by Tanzanians in Uganda is to cater for education purposes. It can

therefore be deduced that Tanzanians are playing an important role in building the

Page 10

Click Here & Upgrade

Expanded Features

PDF Unlimited Pages

Documents

Complete



education industry in Uganda, which includes employment generation for Ugandan

teachers and other workers in the industry. They also create demand for goods (e.g. food)

and services (e.g. transport and telephone communication) in the economy. On the other

side, this can be also read as a detrimental effect on the Tanzanian economy, losing ground

for economical growth based on education and related services to Uganda, for the

impossibility to get high quality educational services in the United Republic. However there

appeared to be a slow reversal of the phenomenon where some Ugandans and Tanzanians

have opened up new schools in Tanzania and were recruiting some Ugandan teachers.



Table 3. Purpose of Sending Money by Migrants in Tanzania and Uganda

Tanzania (n=77) Uganda (n=56)

Purpose of Sending Money by Migrants Senders (%) Senders,% Receivers,%

n=77 n=56 n=28

Household/Family Basic Needs 92.2 30.4 53.6

Children Schooling/College Costs 11.7 10.7 50

Business Running/Investment 2.6 2 1.8

Medical Bills 1.3 16.1 16.1

Housing project 1.3 3.6 0

Farming projects 0 5.4 1.8

Community projects 0 3.6 0

Note: Based on multiple responses on what the money is used for. Responses not additive because people each

person had more than one reason for sending money. Note also that no Ugandan migrant in Tanzania admitted

sending money home for farming or community projects.



It appears that the majority of migrants had limited disposal income to afford regular

sending of money back home, mostly waiting for a chance to personally travel back and take

the money with them. For example, among Ugandan migrants who sent money home

revealed that it was meant to support family basic needs (92.2%). Medical treatment was

another use cited by 16% of responds.



VIII. The Main Challenges in the Remittance Systems

I. Limited vision of the full scale and impact of remittances

The teething problems experienced during the piloting of IFS whereby at first the system

could not be used for domestic transfers and also had some frequent breakdowns of the

system meant that post offices could not confidently embark on a marketing strategy to

make it a preferred system by their customers. The post offices therefore continued

operating as agents of Western Union money transfer system, which is a competitor of IFS.

The continued use of the private-owned system, which is more expensive than post office

own products, denied customers opportunities to save money through cheaper system

supposed to be promoted by post offices. Additionally, the failure of post office to roll out a

cheaper system to remote areas meant that migrants could not easily send money to remote

areas of home countries.







Page 11

Click Here & Upgrade

Expanded Features

PDF Unlimited Pages

Documents

Complete



II. Limited investment in infrastructure, spreading and advertising IFS

Lack of working capital was mentioned as constrain in enabling the Postal Offices to create

the infrastructure allowing the IFS to work (reliable electrical supply and network access), as

well as its widespread diffusion over the country, especially where its services are most

needed to help low income customers. The manpower for operating the system have the

basic experience in operating electronic money transfer system but provided that advantage

to outsourced systems such as Western Union™ money transfer system. There is need to

ensure that Post Offices in Dar es Salaam and Kampala keep of ensuring a reliable system to

avoid losing customers since 80% and 74.2% of funds send out through the IFS are from

these two centres. Indeed the importance of improving electronic remittance of funds and

popularizing IFS was mentioned by 42.8% and 21.8% of the interviewed migrants in both

countries.



As IFS technical weaknesses are rectified, there will be need to strengthen the technical

capability of Post Offices to roll out IFS services and provide reliable services to upcountry

customers.



III. Lack of national identifications documents limiting the access to remittances services

Lack of national identification cards for Tanzanians and Ugandans rendered the exercise of

customer identification more difficult and so banks have to rely on alternative means of

paper identification like a letter from the local chief. This somehow constraints commercial

banks from relaxing their procedures for KYC (know your customer), further pushing the

migrants to resort to informal means of money transfer.



IV. Monitoring and recording for national planning

The interest of Postal Offices and other banks involved in transfer of money between

Uganda and Tanzania is centred on transferring and recording how much money that has

been transferred between the two countries; what profit is obtained in such transactions;

and retaining and attracting more customers to use their services. Their record keeping is

therefore tailored to monitor business transactions. Apparently, even the Central Banks are

only interested in volume of funds transacted. The Banks’ data bases therefore lack data for

routine or even occasional analysis of understanding of the proportion of funds falling

under the category of remittances as per the standard definition. This posed some

difficulties in our attempts to disaggregate the volume of funds transferred between the two

countries by different systems. The only formal requirement from the Central Banks for

individual banks to report on is with respect to the sector source of funds (export proceeds

by category- manufactured goods, agricultural, tourism, etc) and the purpose of sending

money out (for imports by categories, medical, education, etc). No estimation of funds sent

out or received as originating from the Diaspora as remittance.









Page 12

Click Here & Upgrade

Expanded Features

PDF Unlimited Pages

Documents

Complete



IX. Recommendations

Given that IFS has all the technical and logistical features of serving the low income group

of customers down to the village level, thus offering reliability and low cost of transmission,

there is a need to agree on common course of actions on:



a. UPU/PAPU and the Governments of Tanzania and Uganda should explore ways of

improving the IFS system by addressing the need for faster and reliable infrastructure,

such as fast tracking rural electrification which is planned in both Uganda and

Tanzania.

b. The Boards of the Postal Corporations in Uganda and Tanzania must also push to roll

out IFS to remote districts, where it can reach larger group of customers from low

income segments who have no other options to send money to long distances (No

bank account/ Western Union too expensive/ no capacity to travel long distances).

This will also mean revamping the post office image as a reliable service provider.

c. The Governments of Tanzania and Uganda should adopt a simplified EAC cross-

border payment system using IFS and integrating it with other banks as coordinated

by the Central Banks so that payments are done without resorting to the UPU Head

Office for EAC interbank payment clearing.

d. Tanzanian and Ugandan Government policy-makers should ensure streamlining

strategic policies such as improving money transfer services in their country through

expansion of banking networks to rural areas, allowing domestic banks to handle

international money transactions, and introduction of low cost remittance services

such as the IFS System through the local postal offices.

e. The National Bureau of Statistics in Dar es Salaam should recognize that a specific

area of attention should be the specific recording and monitoring funds under the

category of remittances to and from the Diaspora, which is currently lacking in the

national statistics.









Page 13


Shared by: jianghongl
Other docs by jianghongl
“Well Seasoned CHEFS”
Views: 16  |  Downloads: 0
“PREZ
Views: 8  |  Downloads: 0
“GENERATION G”
Views: 8  |  Downloads: 0
“Cooking Class Venues”
Views: 15  |  Downloads: 0
“Bundle” of Joy
Views: 11  |  Downloads: 0
Related docs
By registering with docstoc.com you agree to our
privacy policy

You are almost ready to download!

You are almost ready to download!