Embed
Email

Tax

Document Sample
Tax
Shared by: Darrel Dith
Categories
Tags
Stats
views:
1
posted:
1/8/2012
language:
pages:
2
==== ====



For more information and current updates, please visit:

http://32309924rqkzin3o-6l6p4nt3a.hop.clickbank.net



==== ====







In Australian taxation law there have been numerous cases that deal with the question of when

interest, which is paid on borrowed money, is tax deductible. A recent case, decided by the Full

Federal Court, also dealt with this question in the situation of a hybrid trust.



A hybrid trust is one where there is a mixture of a discretionary component and a fixed component.

If a trust is a discretionary trust (only) then the trustee has the power to distribute the income and

capital of the trust at the trustee's sole discretion to the beneficiaries of the trust. A fixed trust

(often a unit trust) is one where the income and capital flows, normally, to the unit holder

beneficiaries in proportion to their unit holding. A hybrid trust is a mixture of the two.



The case of Forrest v Commissioner of Taxation dealt with the issue of a unit holder of the trust

(Mr Forrest) borrowing $4.5 million to purchase units in the trust. Mr Forrest then sought to deduct

the interest that he paid on this debt. This was just over $860,000 over the course of three years.



The Commissioner of Taxation argued that the interest was not deductible because the way in

which the trustee of the trust was required to determine what is income attributable to the unit

holders and what is income attributable to the discretionary beneficiaries, was something that did

not create a "present entitlement" for the unit holders, of which Mr Forrest was one. The argument

of the Commissioner was that the trust deed gave the trustee the power to determine what was

capital and what was income for the purposes of the trust. Under the trust deed the capital gains

(both realised and unrealised) were to be distributed to the discretionary beneficiaries and all other

amounts were to be distributed to the unit holders. Because the trustee had to make a decision as

to what amounts were capital and what amounts were income, the Commissioner argued that

there was no clear connection between the incurring of the interest by Mr Forrest and the receipt

of assessable income from the trust. This was because any income that Mr Forrest would receive

was at the discretion of the trustee. So, for example, Mr Forrest may never receive any income if

the trustee always determined that all of the amounts received by the trust were capital.



The taxpayer objected to the assessment and appealed to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal

which agreed with the Commissioner's view and stated that the trust was a discretionary trust. The

taxpayer then appealed from that decision to the Full Federal Court. So, the matter was heard

before three judges.



The Full Federal Court disagreed with both the Commissioner and the Administrative Appeals

Tribunal. The Full Federal Court said that the power of the trustee to determine whether a receipt

of the trust was either capital or income was not a power to unilaterally decide that an amount was

capital or income without regard to the receipt's true nature. That is, an amount that was clearly

income could not be deemed by the trustee to be of a capital nature and directed away from the

unit holders to the discretionary beneficiaries. This meant the power given to the trustee in the

trust deed to determine whether a receipt was capital or income, was merely stating the power of

the trustee to determine whether an amount was capital or income according to law and not an

arbitrary power to say that a receipt was capital or income according to the opinion of the trustee.



This meant that, in the opinion of the Full Federal Court, any income receipts received by the trust

were bound to be directed towards the unit holders in the trust. Therefore there was a clear

expectation that Mr Forrest would receive income in respect of the units that he had purchased in

the trust and, accordingly, the interest deductions were permitted.



Wishing you easier business.



John M. Jeffreys









John Jeffreys brings Australian Taxation and Chief Financial Officer skills to business. John draws

on 30 years of experience. He is a Chartered Accountant and has been a tax partner in major

accounting firms. His website is at http://www.businessease.com.au.









Article Source:

http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=John_Jeffreys









==== ====



For more information and current updates, please visit:

http://32309924rqkzin3o-6l6p4nt3a.hop.clickbank.net



==== ====


Related docs
Other docs by Darrel Dith
Julia Roberts' Top 5 Movies
Views: 1  |  Downloads: 0
Alcatraz Prison
Views: 17  |  Downloads: 0
South Carolina debate
Views: 17  |  Downloads: 0
Backlinks Are Still the Major Website
Views: 8  |  Downloads: 0
What Clubs Does Tiger Woods Use
Views: 16  |  Downloads: 0
Pro Bowl Packages
Views: 15  |  Downloads: 0
By registering with docstoc.com you agree to our
privacy policy

You are almost ready to download!

You are almost ready to download!