Embed
Email

Mesoscale Modeling Branch - Environmental Modeling Center - NOAA

Document Sample

Shared by: pengxuezhi
Categories
Tags
Stats
views:
1
posted:
1/7/2012
language:
pages:
76
N Mesoscale Modeling Branch:

Where We Are and

C Where We’re Going

E Geoff DiMego

geoff.dimego@noaa.gov



P 301-763-8000 ext7221

9 December 2008

1

Where the Nation’s climate and weather services begin

Who We Are

• Government Scientists • Contractor Scientists

– Tom Black – Ed Colon*

– Jun Du – Brad Ferrier

– Dennis Keyser – George Gayno*

– Ying Lin – Ho-Chun Huang*

– Geoff Manikin – Dusan Jovic*

– Ken Mitchell* – LSM Lead – Dongchul Kim*

– Jeff McQueen – Pius Lee

– Dave Parrish – Shun Liu

– Matt Pyle – Guang-Ping Lou

– Eric Rogers – Manuel Pondeca*

– Wan-Shu Wu – Jim Purser*

3

SREFp indicates higher probability

over lower MS Valley (also note

mean STP = 3 contour in SREFp

but not in SREF)

60

HPC: ZR forecast verifying at 00 UTC on 17 Dec 2007: SREFP

shows better areal coverage and amount



F24hr F48hr









OPS SREF









F24hr F48hr









PARA SREF









61

Precip Scores 4 Cold-Season Retro Runs (Ying Lin)

ETS ETS









bias bias





(1) Feb. 9-14, 2008, HPC (2) Feb. 2-6, 2008, SPC (Super Tue Tornado)









ETS ETS









bias bias







(3) Jan. 1-6, 2008, HPC (4) Dec. 14-16, 2007, HPC 62

Precip Verification from NCO’s parallel SREF: both

ETS and Bias scores improved (from Ying)









63

SREF 09z Calibrated Lightning

Verification of Lightning Fcsts Valid 00 UTC 5 Nov 2008

SREF 3 Day Sample SREFp 3 Day Sample









SREF -

SREFp Thunderstorm Calibration Statistics:

6 Month • SREFp Brier score slightly improved

Sample (13% vs 9% improvement over climo)

• SREFp ROC area slightly improved

(0.83 vs 0.78)

• Expect results to continue to improve as

64

calibration adjusts to SREFp

Summary of SREF Evaluations

• Strong low-level temperature cold bias is gone for

NMM members

• Both individual members and ensemble mean perform

better

• Ensemble spread quality improves

• Probabilistic forecast improves

• More detailed features are seen such as precip and T

fields due to model resolution increase

• More frequent forecast outputs (hourly) and new

aviation ensemble products available to forecasters

• More balanced in membership among four models used

(about 5 each)

• SPC, HPC, AWC and Rich Grumm gave “Thumbs Up”



65

Chronology & Current Status

• July Code handed over to NCO

• August Major changes to produce hourly output

• August/September EMC ran cold season retro runs for HPC and SPC and

NCO & EMC worked to construct the NCO parallel system

• Sept 20 NCO parallel starts to run regularly

• Oct. 14 – Nov. 14 Official forecaster evaluation period

• Nov. 17 Fix to turn on precipitation rate field for ARW members (discovered

and requested by SPC/David Bright)

• Nov. 19 Failure due to script error (shared working directories)

• Nov. 21 ARW member fails due to bad input data

• Nov. 22-23 Three 21z runs fail with fix for shared directory problem

• Nov. 25 New SREF implementation is postponed



• EMC will establish a SREF parallel on new Cirrus machine

– Produce hourly output for SPC calibrations

– Re-submit clean SREF package for implementation later in 2009





66

FY2010 SREF Upgrade

• Expand bias correction to full domain (grids #221

for all of No. Am., #216 for AK and #243 for

Pacific Region)

• Downscale all members to at least ~12km with

NAM hi-res control

• Downscale all members to 5 km for those

variables provided by RTMA

• Add ensemble product based on BUFR

• Bias correct precipitation

• Replace breeding with ET method

• Add 10-50-90 precentile output

67

FY2008 Experimental

NAM-driven HYSPLIT

Alaskan Smoke Product

Now Run by NCO in

NWPROD









68

Operational FY08 Forecast Domain

48 h forecasts of Sfc Ozone at 06 and 12Z









259

grid

cells

CONUS “5x” Domain

(clean, static BC)

1. Operational NAM-CMAQ

2. Exp: NAM-CMAQ w/ PM



442 grid cells

69

2008 Real-time Runs

WRF-CMAQ 48 h forecasts



System Domain Chemistry Emissions PBL



Operational CONUS CB-04 EGU: 2008 DOE Asymmetric

Prod: 06/12Z 22 L common gas-phase projected Convective

65p, 35 min hybrid vertical 2005 Area:2005 NEI Model

coordinate Mobile: OTAG & (ACM-2)

2005 NEI

Experimental Para: CONUS 22 L CB05 w/ Same as Ops but for ACM-2

06/12Z “ “ harmonized expanded CB05

127p, 120 min aerosols species



Develop CONUS 22 L CB05 w/ heterog. Same as EXP w/ ACM-2 w/ NAM

Dev2: 06Z only “ “ aerosols & smoke HMS/BlueSky wild Kz & mixed layer

127p, 120 min fire sources fire sources depth





Results with CB05 were slightly worse

so no SMAQ upgrade this year. 70

8hr Max Ozone: July 10, 2008









Experimental Run :

• Better over SJV, SAC valleys 71

•Stronger Overprediction over LA basin by as much as 40 ppb comp. to obs

Air Quality FY09 Milestones



• Add experimental Ozone runs for Alaska and Hawaii

domains

• Declare Alaska HYSPLIT smoke run operational



• Add experimental Hawaii HYSPLIT smoke run and

CONUS dust product

• Upgrade HYSPLIT physics and test a CONUS dust

capability

• Continue exp & dev Particulate Matter runs with CMAQ



72

Proposed O-CONUS Domains

in FY09









Alaska 2.5X Hawaii 0.5X









73

Other Projects

• DTRA / dispersion (McQueen)

• Verification implementation & unification

Verification implementation & unification

http://www.emc.ncep.noaa.gov/mmb/gplou/emchurr/nwprod/

• Aviation products for ICAO & Transition of

Transition of

AWRP algorithms from AWC to

FAA AWRP algorithms from AWC to

NCEP’s CCS.





74

75

■ Cyclone tracking & verification system

NCEP/EMC Cyclone Tracking and

Verification System







J-Jobs

4 times daily: GFS, NAM, GEFS, SREF

2 times daily: ECMWF, CMC, NOGAPS,

UKMET, CENS (00Z, 12Z)

SMS 1 time daily: EENS (12Z)





21 CPU for GEFS, SREF Single CPU for GFS, NAM,

17 CPU for CENS

POE ECMWF, CMC, UKMET,

50 CPU for EENS Scripts NOGAPS



Model data



Search





Output forecast tracks

(ATCF, TIGGE)



Climate pairs each month

Storage (ATCF, MySQL)







Climate verification

month, season, year





Forecast

tracks Visualization: Web display

Forecast tracks

Match Verify

Analysis tracks

pairs F vs A Position errors 76

Analysis X-Y biases, etc

tracks



Related docs
Other docs by pengxuezhi
Book 1.indb
Views: 5  |  Downloads: 0
Bone Marrow Donation My Story
Views: 11  |  Downloads: 0
bocesaudit
Views: 4  |  Downloads: 0
BOB Profile-Sept05
Views: 7  |  Downloads: 0
Bloomsbury rights list
Views: 4  |  Downloads: 0
Blog Archive
Views: 4  |  Downloads: 0
Birmingham - Budget Rent-A-Car UK
Views: 4  |  Downloads: 0
By registering with docstoc.com you agree to our
privacy policy

You are almost ready to download!

You are almost ready to download!