wakeup3.rtf - Protect Our Borders by pengxuebo

VIEWS: 5 PAGES: 84

									Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers
from the consent of the governed, - That whenever any Form of
Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the
People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government. ~
Declaration of Independence ~



I recently asked my friend's little girl what she wanted to be when
she

grows up. She said she wanted to be president some day.



Both of her parents, liberal Democrats, were standing there, so I
asked

her, "If you were president what would be the first thing you would
do?"



She replied, "I'd give food and houses to all the homeless people."

Her parents beamed.



"Wow... what a worthy goal." I told her,   "But you don't have to
wait

until you're president to do that. You can come over to my house and
mow

the lawn, pull weeds, and sweep my yard, and I'll pay you $50."



 "Then I'll take you over to the grocery store where homeless guys
hang

out, and you can give them the $50 you earned, to use toward food
and a

new house."



She thought that over for a few seconds, then she looked me
straight in

the eye and asked, "Why doesn't the homeless guy come over and
do the

work, and you can just pay him the $50?"



I said, "Welcome to the Republican Party."



Her parents still aren't speaking to me.

Steve Hampton
www.protectourborder.net
www.protectourborder.net/jokes.rtf
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/protectourbordernow

Politics are all about compromise. Let's explain this numerically. On a scale of 1 to 10
with 1 being ultra conservative (pilgrim), and 10 being a fat head (Ted Kennedy). If you
vote for a 5, and they vote for a 10, then you will get a 7.5 average result in Congress.
The only solution is to vote for someone with a lower rating or more conservative than
yourself, and with normal political compromise you will eventually get what you want.
Liberals are choking on their laughter thinking you can't figure this out, but you just
did:)




The Socialist Party candidate for President of the U.S., Norman Thomas, said
this in a 1944 speech:

"The American people will never knowingly adopt socialism. But, under the
name of "liberalism, " they will adopt every fragment of the socialist
program, until one day America will be a socialist nation, without knowing
how it happened." He went on to say: "I no longer need to run as a
Presidential Candidate for the Socialist Party. The Democrat Party has
adopted our platform."


Dear Mr. President, Senate and House of Representatives:

I'm planning to move my family and extended family (18-20 mouths) into Mexico for my health, and I would
like to ask you to assist me.
We're planning to simply walk across the border from the U.S. into Mexico, and we'll need your help to
make a few arrangements.

We plan to skip all the legal stuff like visas, passports, immigration quotas and laws. I'm sure they handle
those things the same way you do here.

So, would you mind telling your buddy, President Calderon, that I'm on my way over? Please let him know
that I will be expecting the following:


1. Free medical care for my entire family.
2. English-speaking government bureaucrats for all services I might need, whether I use them or not.
3. All Mexico government forms need to also be printed in English.
4. I want my kids to be taught Spanish by English-speaking (bi-lingual) teachers.
5. Schools need to include classes on American culture and history.
6. I want my kids to see the American flag on one of the flag poles at their school.
7. Please plan to feed my kids at school for both breakfast and lunch.
8. I will need a local Mexican driver's license so I can get easy access to government services.
9. I do plan to get a car and drive in Mexico, but, I don't plan to purchase car insurance, and I probably
won't make any special effort to learn local traffic laws.
10. In case one of the Mexican police officers does not get the memo from their president to leave me
alone, please be sure that every patrol car has at least one English-speaking officer.
11. I plan to fly the U.S. flag from my house top, put U S. flag decals on my car, and have a gigantic
celebration on July 4th.
I do not want any complaints or negative comments from the locals.
12. I would also like to have a nice job without paying any taxes, or have any labor or tax laws enforced on
any business I may start.

13. Please have the president tell all the Mexican people to be extremely nice and never say a critical
things about me or my family, or about the strain we might place on their economy.

I know this is an easy request because you already do all these things for all his people who come to the
U.S. from Mexico. I am sure that President Calderon won't mind returning the favor if you ask him nicely.

Thank you so much for your kind help.

Sincerely, US Citizen & Taxpayer

Steve Hampton
www.protectourborder.net
www.protectourborder.net/jokes.rtf
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/protectourbordernow
Politics are all about compromise. Let's explain this numerically. On a scale of 1 to 10
with 1 being ultra conservative (pilgrim), and 10 being a fat head (Ted Kennedy). If you
vote for a 5, and they vote for a 10, then you will get a 7.5 average result in Congress.
The only solution is to vote for someone with a lower rating or more conservative than
yourself, and with normal political compromise you will eventually get what you want.
Liberals are choking on their laughter thinking you can't figure this out, but you just
did:)


LET ME SEE IF I GOT THIS RIGHT!!

IF YOU CROSS THE NORTH KOREAN BORDER ILLEGALLY YOU GET 12
YEARS HARD LABOR.

IF YOU CROSS THE IRANIAN BORDER ILLEGALLY YOU ARE
DETAINED INDEFINITELY.

IF YOU CROSS THE AFGHAN BORDER ILLEGALLY, YOU GET SHOT.

IF YOU CROSS THE SAUDI ARABIAN BORDER ILLEGALLY YOU WILL
BE JAILED.

IF YOU CROSS THE CHINESE BORDER ILLEGALLY YOU MAY NEVER BE
HEARD FROM

AGAIN.

IF YOU CROSS THE VENEZUELAN BORDER ILLEGALLY YOU WILL BE
BRANDED A SPY AND YOUR FATE WILL BE SEALED.

IF YOU CROSS THE CUBAN BORDER ILLEGALLY YOU WILL BE
THROWN INTO POLITICAL PRISON TO ROT.



IF YOU CROSS THE U.S. BORDER ILLEGALLY YOU GET --

A JOB,

A DRIVERS LICENSE,

SOCIAL SECURITY CARD,

WELFARE,

FOOD STAMPS,

CREDIT CARDS,

SUBSIDIZED RENT OR A LOAN TO BUY A HOUSE,
FREE EDUCATION,

FREE HEALTH CARE,

A LOBBYIST IN WASHINGTON

BILLIONS OF DOLLARS WORTH OF PUBLIC DOCUMENTS PRINTED IN
YOUR      LANGUAGE

THE RIGHT TO CARRY YOUR COUNTRY'S FLAG WHILE YOU PROTEST
THAT YOU DON'T GET

ENOUGH RESPECT AND, IN MANY INSTANCES, YOU CAN VOTE.

I JUST WANTED TO MAKE SURE I HAVE A FIRM GRASP ON
REALITY.....

GOD BLESS OUR ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES

Steve Hampton
www.protectourborder.net
www.protectourborder.net/jokes.rtf
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/protectourbordernow

Politics are all about compromise. Let's explain this numerically. On a scale of 1 to 10
with 1 being ultra conservative (pilgrim), and 10 being a fat head (Ted Kennedy). If you
vote for a 5, and they vote for a 10, then you will get a 7.5 average result in Congress.
The only solution is to vote for someone with a lower rating or more conservative than
yourself, and with normal political compromise you will eventually get what you want.
Liberals are choking on their laughter thinking you can't figure this out, but you just
did:)

Palin is pro Amnesty

Think about this. John McCain picked her for a reason, and the media
is pushing her as the next republican nominee. Why??? It should be
obvious. They know that if she were to be elected she would push
for another amnesty just as Obama. That's all the liberal media cares
about. They also believe and rightfully so, that half the republicans
will not vote for Palin because of her reluctance to commit 100% to
secure borders, and enforcement. That means Obama will win
reelection. Either way, the liberal media wins, and eventually Illegal
Immigration will be legalized forever. Keep in mind that amnesty for
10 million actually means amnesty for 50 million once they are
allowed to bring in their relatives, and the children they will have.
http://www.diggersrealm.com/mt/archives/002985.html

Steve Hampton
www.protectourborder.net
www.protectourborder.net/jokes.rtf
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/protectourbordernow

Politics are all about compromise. Let's explain this numerically. On a scale of 1 to 10
with 1 being ultra conservative (pilgrim), and 10 being a fat head (Ted Kennedy). If you
vote for a 5, and they vote for a 10, then you will get a 7.5 average result in Congress.
The only solution is to vote for someone with a lower rating or more conservative than
yourself, and with normal political compromise you will eventually get what you want.
Liberals are choking on their laughter thinking you can't figure this out, but you just
did:)

"The Proposal"

 When a company falls on difficult times, one of the things that
seems to happen is they reduce their staff and workers. The
remaining workers must find ways to continue to do a good job or
risk that their job would be eliminated as well.

 Wall street, and the media normally congratulate the CEO for
making this type of "tough decision", and his board of directors
gives him a big bonus.

Our government should not be immune from similar risks.

Therefore:

 Reduce the House of Representatives from the current 435
members to 218 members.

 Reduce Senate members from 100 to 50 (one per State). Then,
reduce their staff by 25%.

Accomplish this over the next 8 years (two steps/two elections) and
of course this would require some redistricting.

Some Yearly Monetary Gains Include:

$44,108,400 for elimination of base pay for congress. (267 members
X $165,200 pay/member/ yr.)

$97,175,000 for elimination of their staff. (estimate $1.3 Million in
staff per each member of the House, and $3 Million in staff per each
member of the Senate every year)
$240,294 for the reduction in remaining staff by 25%.

$7,500,000,000 reduction in pork barrel ear-marks each year. (those
members whose jobs are gone.. Current estimates for total
government pork earmarks are at $15 Billion/yr).

The remaining representatives would need to work smarter and
improve efficiencies.. It might even be in their best interests to work
together for the good of our country!

We may also expect that smaller committees might lead to a more
efficient resolution of issues as well. It might even be easier to keep
track of what your representative is doing.

Congress has more tools available to do their jobs than it had back in
1911 when the current number of representatives was established.
(telephone, computers, cell phones to name a few)

Note:

Congress did not hesitate to head home when it was a holiday, when
the nation needed a real fix to the economic problems. Also, we had
3 senators that were not doing their jobs for the 18+ months (on
the campaign trail) and still they all have accepted full pay. These
facts alone support a reduction in senators & congress.

Summary of opportunity:

$ 44,108,400 reduction of congress members.

$282,100, 000 for elimination of the reduced house member staff.

$150,000,000 for elimination of reduced senate member staff.

$59,675,000 for 25% reduction of staff for remaining house
members.

$37,500,000 for 25% reduction of staff for remaining senate
members.

$7,500,000,000 reduction in pork added to bills by the reduction of
congress members.

$8,073,383,400 per year, estimated total savings. (that's 8-BILLION
just to start!)

Big business does these types of cuts all the time.

If Congresscritters were required to serve 20, 25 or 30 years (like
everyone else) in order to collect retirement benefits, tax payers
could save a bundle.

Now they get full retirement after serving only ONE                 term.



IF you are happy with how Congress spends our taxes, delete this
message. Otherwise, I assume you know what to do.

IN GOD WE TRUST

Forget The Tea



Throw The Government Overboard

 IN GOD WE TRUST

p.s. The only way this is ever going to happen is if we boycott the
census since they determine representation with it. These days, they
are using the census to give more representation to Illegal Aliens. I
think every state could stand to lose a couple of Representatives,
since they aren't representing you anyway. The penalty for not
returning your Census form is $100, for not providing truthful
information $500, and for a census worker providing false
information $5,000. They have never fined anyone yet, since the
penalties are more to remind people of the importance of filling
them out.

Eliminating half of Congress for a possible $100 fine, Priceless!!!

Steve Hampton
www.protectourborder.net
www.protectourborder.net/jokes.rtf
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/protectourbordernow

Politics are all about compromise. Let's explain this numerically. On a scale of 1 to 10
with 1 being ultra conservative (pilgrim), and 10 being a fat head (Ted Kennedy). If you
vote for a 5, and they vote for a 10, then you will get a 7.5 average result in Congress.
The only solution is to vote for someone with a lower rating or more conservative than
yourself, and with normal political compromise you will eventually get what you want.
Liberals are choking on their laughter thinking you can't figure this out, but you just
did:)
Please read this entire letter written by Pat Boone. He says
everything that I want to say to Obama..

The President Without A Country

By Pat Boone

"We're no longer a Christian nation." - President Barack Obama,
June 2007

" America has been arrogant." - President Barack Obama

"After 9/11, America didn't always live up to her ideals."- President
Barack Obama

"You might say that America is a Muslim nation."- President Barack
Obama, Egypt 2009

Thinking about these and other statements made by the man who
wears the title of president. I keep wondering what country he
believes he's president of.

In one of my very favorite stories, Edward Everett Hale's "The Man
without a Country," a young Army lieutenant named Philip Nolan
stands condemned for treason during the Revolutionary War, having
come under the influence of Aaron Burr. When the judge asks him if
he wishes to say anything before sentence is passed, young Nolan
defiantly exclaims, "Damn the United States ! I wish I might never
hear of the United States again!"

The stunned silence in the courtroom is palpable, pulsing. After a
long pause, the judge soberly says to the angry lieutenant: "You
have just pronounced your own sentence. You will never hear of the
United States again... I sentence you to spend the rest of your life at
sea, on one or another of this country's naval vessels - under strict
orders that no one will ever speak to you again about the country
you have just cursed."

And so it was. Philip Nolan was taken away and spent the next 40
years at sea, never hearing anything but an occasional slip of the
tongue about America. The last few pages of the story, recounting
Nolan's dying hours in his small stateroom - now turned into a
shrine to the country he fore swore - never fail to bring me to tears.
And I find my own love for this dream, this miracle called America ,
refreshed and renewed. I know how blessed and unique we are..

But reading and hearing the audacious, shocking statements of the
man who was recently elected our president - a young black man
living the impossible dream of millions of young Americans, past and
present, black and white - I want to ask him, "Just what country do
you think you're president of?"

You surely can't be referring to the United States of America , can
you? America is emphatically a Christian nation, and has been from
its inception! Seventy percent of her citizens identify themselves as
Christian. The Declaration of Independence and our Constitution
were framed, written and ratified by Christians. It's because this
was, and is, a nation built on and guided by Judeo-Christian biblical
principles that you, sir, have had the inestimable privilege of being
elected her president.

You studied law at Harvard, didn't you, sir? You taught
constitutional law in Chicago ? Did you not ever read the statement
of John Jay, the first Chief Justice of the Supreme Court and an
author of the landmark "Federalist Papers": "Providence has given
to our people the choice of their rulers - and it is the duty, as well as
the privilege and interest of our Christian nation - to select and
prefer Christians for their rulers"?

In your studies, you surely must have read the decision of the
Supreme Court in 1892: "Our lives and our institutions must
necessarily be based upon and embody the teachings of the
Redeemer of mankind. It is impossible that it should be otherwise;
and in this sense and to this extent our civilization and our
institutions are emphatically Christian."

Did your professors have you skip over all the high-court decisions
right up till the mid 1900's that echoed and reinforced these views
and intentions? Did you pick up the history of American
jurisprudence only in 1947, when for the first time a phrase coined
by Thomas Jefferson about a "wall of separation between church
and state" was used to deny some specific religious expression -
contrary to Jefferson ' s intent with that statement?

Or, wait a minute . Were your ideas about America 's Christianity
formed during the 20 years you were a member of the Trinity United
Church of Christ under your pastor, Jeremiah Wright? Is that where
you got the idea that " America is no longer a Christian nation"? Is
this where you, even as you came to call yourself a Christian, formed
the belief that " America has been arrogant"?

Even if that's the understandable explanation of your damning of
your country and accusing the whole nation (not just a few military
officials trying their best to keep more Americans from being
murdered by jihadists) of "not always living up to her ideals," how
did you come up with the ridiculous, alarming notion that we might
be "considered a Muslim nation"?

Is it because there are some 2 million or more Muslims living here,
trying to be good Americans? Out of a current population of over 300
million, 70 percent of whom are Christians? Does that make us, by
any rational definition, a "Muslim nation"?

Why are we not, then, a "Chinese nation"? A "Korean nation"? Even
a "Vietnamese nation"? There are even more of these distinct groups
in America than Muslims. And if the distinction you're trying to make
is a religious one, why is America not "a Jewish nation"? There's
actually a case to be made for the latter, because our Constitution -
and the success of our Revolution and founding - owe a deep debt to
our Jewish brothers.

Have you stopped to think what an actual Muslim America would be
like? Have you ever really spent much time in Iran ? Even in Egypt ?
You, having been instructed in Islam as a kid at a Muslim school in
Indonesia and saying you still love the call to evening prayers, can
surely picture our nation founded on the Quran, not the
Judeo-Christian Bible, and living under Shariah law. Can't you? You
do recall Muhammad's directives [Surah 9:5,73] to "break the cross"
and "kill the infidel"?

It seems increasingly and painfully obvious that you are more
influenced by your upbringing and questionable education than most
suspected. If you consider yourself the president of a people who
are "no longer Christian," who have "failed to live up to our ideals,"
who "have been arrogant," and might even be "considered Muslim" -
you are president of a country most Americans don't recognize.

Could it be you are a president without a country?

PLEASE SHARE THIS MESSAGE WITH OTHER AMERICANS.

AND FREEDOM LOVERS

Steve Hampton
www.protectourborder.net
www.protectourborder.net/jokes.rtf
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/protectourbordernow
Politics are all about compromise. Let's explain this numerically. On a scale of 1 to 10
with 1 being ultra conservative (pilgrim), and 10 being a fat head (Ted Kennedy). If you
vote for a 5, and they vote for a 10, then you will get a 7.5 average result in Congress.
The only solution is to vote for someone with a lower rating or more conservative than
yourself, and with normal political compromise you will eventually get what you want.
Liberals are choking on their laughter thinking you can't figure this out, but you just
did:)



The Deception:

Conservatives are opposed to all change, all non Christian religions, and
want to impose their moral and religious views on you and your family,
inside your home, at work, and at school. Bush was a conservative and he
destroyed our economy and got us into another Vietnam.

The Truth:

I hate to destroy your illusion, but Bush was no true Conservative, and this
is why even conservatives turned on him. If we had a truly conservative
government, there would be no national debt, no gay marriage, no illegal
immigration, no unfair free trade, and no unnecessary abortion. Two things
have destroyed our economy, free trade, and illegal immigration. The free
trade idea started after World War II, in order to help rebuild war torn
Japan, and Germany, and guess who was in charge then, that's right,
democrats!!! Guess who signed NAFTA, and China, that's right, Bill Clinton, a
democrat!!! The national debt exploded during Vietnam and guess who sent
advisors there to begin with and who kept us there, JFK and Lyndon
Johnson, both democrats. The democrats are also the ones who are leading
the charge to "legalize" Illegal Immigration along with some treasonous
republicans, which will eventually give up political control of this country to
Latin America and lower us to 3rd world status. Both parties also wanted the
mortgage industry to loan money to low income people for homes at the
drop of a hat, and have allowed Illegal Aliens to cut into the profits of many
legitimate businesses such as restaurants, and self employed contractors,
which means they can no longer afford their mortgage and car payments.

This deception that Bush was a conservative, and conservatives oppose all
change is the only way liberals have of trying to convince you that
Conservatives live in the past, and are resistant to change. Bush tried to
create a North American Union without the consent of the American people
or the explicit approval by Congress. He also tried to hand over political
control to Latin America, and ultimately, a NAU controlled by Latin America.
That's not exactly the conservative calling card of a person resistant to
change now is it????
Common sense would tell you that all change can not possibly be good.
Conservatives use their common sense to decide what change to accept, and
what change to reject. The fact is, that Conservatives don't care what
religion you are, your sexual orientation, what you want to watch on cable tv
and listen to on satellite radio. You can be a buddhists having orgies in your
home listening to Howard Stern for all we care. We draw the line when you
try to force your religion, lifestyle, and values into our home on public
airways, workplace or schools. What you do as a consenting adult is your
business as long as you don't violate the law and/or you don't involve
innocent children or pets in your activities and you don't cause a nuisance
for your neighbors and the community. This is only common sense.

Every nation has a right and a duty to protect their traditional way of life,
and practice the customs of their ancestors such as Christmas pageants, and
the Pledge of Allegiance, without fear of lawsuits due to minor Constitutional
imperfections. We have a duty and a right to preserve our Christian
heritage. The melting pot idea has worked for over 200 years, but it is now
obvious that English speaking Christians are in danger of being
overwhelmed, and are already being persecuted by lawsuits, and turned into
a minority group in our own land.

It is your responsibility as a Legal Immigrant to assimmilate properly, learn
our language, and respect our traditional way of life. Immigrants must adapt
to our culture, not the other way around. If not, the majority of us are
natural born citizens now, and we have the right and duty to limit our
Immigration numbers to ensure a loyal, homogenous, and law abiding
society. We acknowledge your right to worship as you please, and speak any
language you like in your own church and your own home, but don't expect
us to give up our way of life, our religion, and our language for someone
who would not even be on American soil in the first place, if it were not for
our traditional desire to share freedom of worship, personal liberty, and
democracy, thereby providing a shining example for the world to follow.

Steve Hampton
www.protectourborder.net
www.protectourborder.net/jokes.rtf
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/protectourbordernow

Politics are all about compromise. Let's explain this numerically. On a scale of 1 to 10
with 1 being ultra conservative (pilgrim), and 10 being a fat head (Ted Kennedy). If you
vote for a 5, and they vote for a 10, then you will get a 7.5 average result in Congress.
The only solution is to vote for someone with a lower rating or more conservative than
yourself, and with normal political compromise you will eventually get what you want.
Liberals are choking on their laughter thinking you can't figure this out, but you just
did:)



EIGHT REASONS WHY AMNESTY IS A BAD IDEA

By Allan Wall

March 24, 2009
NewsWithViews. com

THE MOVEMENT TO GRANT AMNESTY TO ILLEGAL ALIENS is afoot once more,
despite the fact that most Americans oppose it. That's why its supporters
don't call it "amnesty" at all, but "regularization" or "comprehensive
immigration reform" or some other such euphemism. Amnesty can be approved by
various sneaky methods, in order to avoid real debate on the issue -
something amnesty-backers desperately wish to avoid. Amnesty could be
attached as a "rider" on a popular bill, pushed through at an odd time in
the legislative calendar or approved in such a manner as not to reveal who
was really for it and who wasn't. Amnesty could also be approved by
including it in a "temporary" worker program to "solve" a non-existent labor
shortage, or any number of clever subterfuges.

Any way you cut it, though, amnesty is a bad deal for the U.S.A.
Consider a few reasons:

1. OUR IMMIGRATION OFFICIALS ARE ALREADY SWAMPED

Our immigration officials are already swamped with existing
responsibility. Administering an amnesty to millions of illegal aliens would
almost guarantee that it isn't done properly.

Do you actually believe that background checks would be run on
millions of illegals? How many drug smugglers and terrorists would be
amnestied with the vast multitude?

Spanish-speaking countries don't utilize the same surname system as we
do in English. In Spanish they have two surnames, a paternal surname and a
maternal surname. (For more information, click here) . That fact alone makes
it difficult to do background checks on millions of illegals from Latin
America, especially when our immigration bureaucracy is swamped to begin
with.

2. AN AMNESTY ENCOURAGES MORE ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION

Both common sense and experience tell you that. The approval of any
amnesty deal would be known in Mexico and in other countries immediately, if
not sooner. When I was living in Mexico one of my sixth-grade students
informed me there was to be another amnesty.

Amnesty sends a message to immigrant-sending countries that America is
a pushover, and that future illegal aliens are also likely to be amnestied
as well.

Back in 1986, there was a big amnesty that was supposed to be the
amnesty to end all amnesties. Now there are more illegal aliens in the
United States than in 1986.

Granting any or all of these illegal aliens an amnesty is not a
solution because it encourages more illegal immigration. Which means at a
future date, another amnesty will be promoted as the solution....

3. AN AMNESTY IS A SLAP IN THE FACE TO LEGAL IMMIGRANTS WHO PLAY BY
THE RULES

A legal immigrant expressed it to me this way, "Here I am like an
idiot, applying to immigrate, filling out papers, learning English, getting
a job, paying taxes, becoming part of the American community - and for what?
So that my taxes can support the 3 million illegals who cross the border,
get on welfare, send their kids to Spanish schools, get free health care
(for which I have to pay of course) and wait for their citizenship to show
up at the door, then turn around and vote for people who will raise my taxes
to let in another 3 million?"

The correspondent also told me that. "I have been here for almost 20
years. America has changed so drastically and for the worse. If I had it
over today I would stay home. Very sad."

An amnesty sends a powerful message to prospective immigrants in other
countries. It tells them that it's simpler, and more rewarding, to emigrate
illegally than legally.

4. AMNESTY IS A SECURITY BREACH

The 9/11 attack was, among other things, a failure of U.S. immigration
policy. We are all paying for it.

Our troops are laying their lives on the line in Afghanistan and Iraq
and may soon do so in other places.

We now have to spend more time in airports being checked. Even our
soldiers are checked in the airports. When I did my tour of duty in Iraq, I
was checked in a U.S. airport on my way back after my two weeks leave.
As always in times of national stress, our civil liberties too could
be in danger if we're not careful.

How then can national leaders, of both parties, have the unmitigated
gall to even consider granting amnesty to people who did not respect our
laws, to people who entered our country illegally, or over-stayed their
visas?

Advertisement

Bear in mind that the already existing infrastructure supporting
illegal immigration (document fraud, etc.) can be easily utilized by
terrorists. Seven of the 9/11 suicide attackers acquired phony
identification with the aid of illegal aliens, using the fraudulent
infrastructure that already exists to serve illegals. An open border, by its
very definition, does not discriminate between those who want to work
illegally and those who wish to wreak havoc.

5. NO AMNESTY SHOULD PRECEDE OUR DEALING WITH MORE BASIC
QUESTIONS

Before amnesty is even suggested, there are basic issues that must be
dealt with.

Immigration is a public policy issue that the American people have the
right to decide upon. The basic question, usually ignored, is, " What kind
of immigration system should we have?" It's not wrong for American citizens
to ask this question, nor is it wrong for them to question the present
system.

The present legal immigration system is based on nepotism, i.e., the
majority of legal immigrants are accepted because they have relatives
already in the country. Is such a system really appropriate for 21st-century
America?

What about dual citizenship? More and more people have it, but our
leaders are afraid to deal with it. How does dual citizenship impact
American civic values and equality before the law?

And how about those anchor babies? Is it fair to reward illegal
immigrants by automatically declaring their children citizens?

These are important questions that should be dealt with and resolved
before ANY amnesty is even considered.
6. AN AMNESTY WILL RECRUIT MORE DEMOCRATIC VOTERS

Most immigrants nowadays vote for the Democratic party. If millions of
illegal aliens are amnestied, guess what party they will vote for?

Therefore, it's totally understandable why Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid
want to amnesty illegal aliens. They are recruiting more voters for the
Democratic Party.

What's amazing is that many prominent Republican leaders, including
John McCain and former president George W. Bush, promote amnesty, when it
threatens the future of the Republican Party. It's just another example of
how the GOP constantly shoots itself in the foot.

7. AN AMNESTY WILL HASTEN THE DEMOGRAPHIC TRANSFORMATION OF THE
UNITED
STATES

Many people don't like to talk about this one, but it ought to be
front and center, because it affects all of us.

If present immigration and birth rates continue, within a few more
decades, the U.S. will no longer be a white majority nation.

Now, some people say this doesn't matter, and it's racist to even
bring it up.

But think about it - the white Americans form the historical majority
of this nation. Were we ever asked if we wanted to become a minority? Did we
get a chance to vote on it? Did Congress ever have a straight up or down
vote on the abolition of the historical majority of this nation?

Is the loss of the white majority a good idea ? Will it make this a
better country? Will other racial groups get along with each other?

Aren't these legitimate questions to ask, before accelerating the
demographic transformation of our nation?

8. AMNESTY, AND EMIGRATION IN GENERAL, DON'T REALLY HELP MEXICO
ANYWAY

An amnesty would signal to Mexico's leadership that it can continue to
send its poor to the U.S. rather than solve Mexico's problems in Mexico.

Certainly, the existence of a more prosperous Mexico is in the best
interests of the United States. However, the current mass immigration policy
is hardly bringing about that goal. Mass emigration serves as an impediment
to Mexico's development. Why take the difficult decisions to improve Mexico's
long-term prospects when the poor people can be sent northwards?

How can we help Mexico prosper? By cutting off the safety valve that
encourages its leadership to dodge the tough decisions. When that happens,
you can expect to see some real reform, but not until then.

------------

Allan Wall recently returned to the U.S. after residing many years in
Mexico.
Website: www.allanwall. net


Steve Hampton
www.protectourborder.net
www.protectourborder.net/jokes.rtf
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/protectourbordernow

Politics are all about compromise. Let's explain this numerically. On a scale of 1 to 10
with 1 being ultra conservative (pilgrim), and 10 being a fat head (Ted Kennedy). If you
vote for a 5, and they vote for a 10, then you will get a 7.5 average result in Congress.
The only solution is to vote for someone with a lower rating or more conservative than
yourself, and with normal political compromise you will eventually get what you want.
Liberals are choking on their laughter thinking you can't figure this out, but you just
did:)



Judge Roy Moore

Alabama Judge

Some of you may be wondering what Judge Roy Moore has been doing since
he was removed from the bench for refusing to remove the Ten
Commandments from his courtroom wall. Please read the poem he wrote It's
below his picture.

The following is a poem written by Judge Roy Moore from Alabama. Judge
Moore was sued by the ACLU for displaying the Ten Commandments in his
courtroom foyer. He has been stripped of his judgeship and now they are
trying to strip his right to practice law in Alabama! The judge's poem sums it
up quite well.
America the beautiful,
or so you used to be.
Land of the Pilgrims' pride;
I'm glad they'll never see.

Babies piled in dumpsters,
Abortion on demand,
Oh, sweet land of liberty;
your house is on the sand.

Our children wander aimlessly
poisoned by cocaine
choosing to indulge their lusts,
when God has said abstain

From sea to shining sea,
our Nation turns away
From the teaching of God's love
and a need to always pray

We've kept God in our
temples,how callous we have grown.
When earth is but His footstool,
and Heaven is His throne.

We've voted in a government
that's rotting at the core,
Appointing Godless Judges;
who throw reason out the door,

Too soft to place a killer
in a well deserved tomb,
But brave enough to kill a baby
before he leaves the womb.

You think that God's not
angry,that our land's a moral slum?
How much longer will He wait
before His judgment comes?

How are we to face our God,
from Whom we cannot hide?
What then is left for us to do,
but stem this evil tide?
If we who are His children,
will humbly turn and pray;
Seek His holy face
and mend our evil way:

Then God will hear from Heaven;
and forgive us of our sins,
He'll heal our sickly land
and those who live within.

But, America the Beautiful,
If you don't - then you will see,
A sad but Holy God
withdraw His hand from Thee.

~~Judge Roy Moore~~

This says it all. May we all forward this message and offer our prayers for
Judge Moore to be blessed and for America to wake up and realize what we
need to do to keep OUR America the Beautiful.

Pass this on and let's lift Judge Moore up in Prayer.He has stood firm and
needs our support.

IN GOD WE TRUST!

Steve Hampton
www.protectourborder.net
www.protectourborder.net/jokes.rtf
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/protectourbordernow

Politics are all about compromise. Let's explain this numerically. On a scale of 1 to 10
with 1 being ultra conservative (pilgrim), and 10 being a fat head (Ted Kennedy). If you
vote for a 5, and they vote for a 10, then you will get a 7.5 average result in Congress.
The only solution is to vote for someone with a lower rating or more conservative than
yourself, and with normal political compromise you will eventually get what you want.
Liberals are choking on their laughter thinking you can't figure this out, but you just
did:)



Teachers from Mexico to Help Fill Positions in Utah School Districts
June 11th, 2007 @ 6:03pm
Tonya Papanikolas Reporting

Several Utah school districts have just hired a total of 12 new teachers
from Mexico. The State Office of Education has been working on the plan for
almost a year. This is part of an agreement Governor Huntsman made with
Mexico when he visited there a couple years ago.

School districts say they're happy about it. The teachers will be filling
positions that districts can't seem to staff right now. At the same time,
the teachers will help a growing population of Hispanic students in the
state. School districts are having a harder and harder time finding
elementary school teachers, science and math teachers.

Human Resources Director for Granite School District Mike Fraser says,
"Right now, as we speak, we still have 30 elementary positions to fill."

But the Granite District has just filled three of those spots with teachers
from Mexico. "We think it's going to be very exciting," Fraser says. "These
are very qualified teaching candidates who are proficient in English."

The Granite district was one of four school districts in Utah to send
employees to Mexico where they interviewed over 50 teachers that the
Mexican
Consulate had pre-screened. Other districts include Salt Lake, Tooele County
and Davis County. "Each school district selected three teaching candidates
to bring back to Salt Lake City," Fraser says.

Most of the 12 teachers will speak English in the classroom with the
exception of those hired for dual immersion programs. The Granite District
says the teachers will be a great help to Spanish-speaking students and
their parents, who often feel left out of their child's education. "They're
very intimidated to come to the school, show up at parent-teacher
consultation because of that language barrier," Fraser explains.

Mark Peterson with the Utah Office of Education says, "If the teacher
happens to be teaching math or science or whatever, if they speak Spanish,
it's a bonus."

The three teachers Granite hired all have at least six years of experience
and one has her MBA. The state says it's glad to have that kind of quality
from anywhere. Peterson says, "At the moment, Utah can use highly
qualified
teachers wherever we can get them from, which is why the districts are out
recruiting out of state, and this is just a little further out of state than
normal."

The teachers will arrive in early August. They'll make a salary of around
$35,000, compared to about $12,000 in Mexico. The state is helping the
teachers get a temporary work visa which would allow them to stay here up
to
three years.

p.s. Texas hired over 100 teachers from Mexico on the premise that our
teachers were unable to effectively teach Hispanic kids. That's over 100
teaching jobs that Americans were unjustly denied, and more to come if
allowed to continue.


Steve Hampton
www.protectourborder.net
www.protectourborder.net/jokes.rtf
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/protectourbordernow

Politics are all about compromise. Let's explain this numerically. On a scale of 1 to 10
with 1 being ultra conservative (pilgrim), and 10 being a fat head (Ted Kennedy). If you
vote for a 5, and they vote for a 10, then you will get a 7.5 average result in Congress.
The only solution is to vote for someone with a lower rating or more conservative than
yourself, and with normal political compromise you will eventually get what you want.
Liberals are choking on their laughter thinking you can't figure this out, but you just
did:)


Lou Dobs "Top 5 dumbest aspects of Amnesty Bill." 6/5/07
Tonight Lou gave what he felt were some "Dumbest" aspects of this Amnesty Bill by
someone who wrote to him. The wording may not be exact as he was talking a bit fast.
His answers were:
(5) U.S. Tax Payers will pay for Attorney Fees for Illegal Immigrants.
(4) Illegal Immigrants would be given "Legal Status" in 24 Hours EVEN IF BACK
GROUND
CHECK (as minimal the checks would be) are NOT COMPLETED!!
(3) Gang Members (MS 13 8th Street Gang and some of the most violent drug infested
gangs in the world) would be given Amnesty by signing a piece of paper saying they
quit
the gang.
(2) Borders WILL NOT have to be secure BEFORE Amnesty would be given to the
15-20
Million Illegals in the Country.
(1) The Illegal Immigrants (Just the ones here already NOT counting the 4-5 times as
many
family members and "relatives " who will come) will cost American Tax Payers 2.6
TRILLION dollars JUST in RETIREMENT Social Security ALONE. That doesnt include
ALL the other costs in dollars and lives!!!

Steve Hampton
www.protectourborder.net
www.protectourborder.net/jokes.rtf
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/protectourbordernow

Politics are all about compromise. Let's explain this numerically. On a scale of 1 to 10
with 1 being ultra conservative (pilgrim), and 10 being a fat head (Ted Kennedy). If you
vote for a 5, and they vote for a 10, then you will get a 7.5 average result in Congress.
The only solution is to vote for someone with a lower rating or more conservative than
yourself, and with normal political compromise you will eventually get what you want.
Liberals are choking on their laughter thinking you can't figure this out, but you just
did:)


By MARK STEYN
Syndicated Columnist
About five years or so back, I started making references in columns to "fine upstanding
members of the Undocumented-American community." But from the lame Steyn joke of
yesteryear to the reality of tomorrow is a mere hop and a skip. A few days ago, Harry
Reid, the Senate majority leader, declared:
"This week we will vote on cloture and final passage of a comprehensive bill that will
strengthen border security, bring the 12 million undocumented Americans out of the
shadows, and keep our economy strong."
Talk about "a fast track to citizenship"! Never mind probationary visas, Z-visas and
Green Cards, in the eyes of the Democrat steering "comprehensive immigration reform"
through Congress these guys are already "undocumented Americans." Was it simply a
slip of the tongue? Or did Senator Reid mean it?
If he did, the very concept of citizenship is dead, and the Senate might as well opt for
really comprehensive immigration reform" and declare everyone on the planet a U.S.
citizen with backdated Social Security entitlements.
I don't know whether this sham of a bill is dead or just resting "in the shadows" like a
fine upstanding member of the Vampiric-American community. But, if it rises on the third
night to stalk the land once more, I would advise its supporters to go about their work
more honestly.
First of all, the only guys "living in the shadows" are the aides of American senators
beavering away out of the public eye to cook up this legislation and then present it as a
fait accompli to the citizenry (if you'll forgive the expression). That is an affront to
small-"r" republican government, and, if intemperate hectoring mediocrities like Trent
Lott and Lindsay Graham don't understand that, then their electors should give them a
well-deserved lesson.
Second, the bill's supporters should stop assuming the bad faith of their opponents. On
Fox News the other night, I was told by NPR's Juan Williams, "You're anti-immigrant!"
Er, actually, I am an immigrant – one of the members of the very very teensy-weensy
barely statistically detectable category of "legal immigrant." But perhaps that doesn't
count any more. Perhaps, like Colin Powell's blackness, it's insufficiently "authentic." By
filing the relevant paperwork with the United States government, I'm not "keepin' it real."
I wouldn't presume to speak for the millions of Americans who oppose this bill, but it's
because I'm an immigrant myself that I object to the most patent absurdity peddled by
the pro-amnesty crowd. The bill is fundamentally a fraud. Its "comprehensive solution"
to illegal immigration is simply to flip all the illegals overnight into the legal category.
Voila! Problem solved! There can be no more illegal immigrants because the Senate
has simply abolished the category. Ingenious! For their next bipartisan trick, Congress
will reduce the murder rate by recategorizing murderers as jaywalkers.
Back in the real world, far from those senators living in the nonshadows of their
boundless self-admiration, the truth is that America's immigration bureaucracy cannot
cope with its existing caseload, and thus will certainly be unable to cope with millions of
additional teeming hordes tossed into its waiting room.
Currently, the time in which an immigration adjudicator is expected to approve or reject
an application is six minutes. That's not enough time to read the basic form, never mind
any supporting documentation. Under political pressure to "bring the 12 million
undocumented Americans out of the shadows," the immigration bureaucracy will
rubber-stamp gazillions of applications for open-ended probationary legal status within
24 hours and with no more supporting documentation than a utility bill or an affidavit
from a friend. There's never been a better time for Mullah Omar to apply for U.S.
residency.
Remember the 1986 amnesty? Mahmoud abu Halima applied for it and went on to
bomb the World Trade Center seven years later. His colleague, Mohammad Salameh,
was rejected but carried on living here anyway. John Lee Malvo was detained and
released by U.S. immigration in breach of its own procedures and re-emerged as the
Washington sniper. The young Muslim men who availed themselves of the U.S.
government's "visa express" system for Saudi Arabia filled in joke applications –
"Address in the United States: HOTEL, AMERICA" – that octogenarian snowbirds from
Toronto who've been wintering at their Florida condos since 1953 wouldn't try to get
away with. The late Mohammed Atta received his flight-school student visa on March
11, 2002, six months to the day after famously flying his first and last commercial
airliner.
All the above passed through the legal immigration system. Whether they were
detained, rejected, approved or posthumously approved, in the end it made no
difference. Because U.S. immigration had no real idea who these men were.
But, don't worry, they'll be able to handle another "12 million undocumented Americans"
tossed in for express processing.
The real "immigration fraud" is not Mahmoud abu Halima's or John Lee Malvo's or
Mohammed Atta's, but that of the politicians who attempted to foist this sham bill on the
nation.

Steve Hampton
www.protectourborder.net
www.protectourborder.net/jokes.rtf
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/protectourbordernow

Politics are all about compromise. Let's explain this numerically. On a scale of 1 to 10
with 1 being ultra conservative (pilgrim), and 10 being a fat head (Ted Kennedy). If you
vote for a 5, and they vote for a 10, then you will get a 7.5 average result in Congress.
The only solution is to vote for someone with a lower rating or more conservative than
yourself, and with normal political compromise you will eventually get what you want.
Liberals are choking on their laughter thinking you can't figure this out, but you just
did:)



Will Someone Please Say It

The United States does not have an "immigration" problem.

Americans face a demographic invasion.

Americans face an invasion sponsored by the Mexican government.

Americans face an invasion that is the greatest threat to their survival as a nation since
World War II.

Americans face an invasion that has been encouraged at every step by its government,
legislators and the President of the United States.

Thousands of illegals come across the border every week. This is an unarmed invasion.

The Mexicans call it Reconquista. Reconquering California, Texas, New Mexico,
Arizona.

Mexico believes it has a territorial right to parts, if not all of the United States.

Hundreds of thousands of Mexicans in California demonstrated under the Mexican flag.
This is not assimilation; it is not immigration. It is a demographic take-over.

The U.S. Senate proposes surrender to Mexico. It wants millions of illegal aliens in the
United States to stay. It wants millions more to enter the country. This is not amnesty.
It is surrender.

What Americans need and want is enforcement of our immigration laws. They want
enforcement of our employment laws.

Our immigration system is not broken. What is broken is the failure of the government
to do its Constitutional duty and secure the country against invasion. The government is
the problem-not the laws.

Illegal aliens walked in for jobs. When the jobs dry up; they will walk back home. It is
that simple. You walked in. You can walk back out.

This is a Mexican invasion. It is a threat to the security and continued existence of the
Untied States.

As President I will stop it. As President I will secure our borders. As President I will
enforce our immigration laws. No illegal will be employed in the United States. Every
employer of illegal aliens will go to prison.

As President, I will do my constitutional duty and secure the country against invasion.

I can only hope Tom Tancredo says something like this on Tuesday night. Continuing to
play the "immigration" game of "nation of immigrants," "assimilation," etc., does not
describe what is going on and it is time a candidate said it.


Steve Hampton
www.protectourborder.net
www.protectourborder.net/jokes.rtf
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/protectourbordernow

Politics are all about compromise. Let's explain this numerically. On a scale of 1 to 10
with 1 being ultra conservative (pilgrim), and 10 being a fat head (Ted Kennedy). If you
vote for a 5, and they vote for a 10, then you will get a 7.5 average result in Congress.
The only solution is to vote for someone with a lower rating or more conservative than
yourself, and with normal political compromise you will eventually get what you want.
Liberals are choking on their laughter thinking you can't figure this out, but you just
did:)



New Hampshire Reminds Feds of the Constitution and More Links

The New Hampshire state legislature took an unbelievably bold step
today by introducing a resolution to declare certain actions by the
federal government to be completely totally void and warning that
certain future acts will be viewed as a "breach of peace" with the
states themselves that risks "nullifying the Constitution. "

This act by New Hampshire is a clear warning to the federal
government that they could face being stripped of their power by the
States!

The remarkable document outlines with perfect clarity, some basics
long forgotten. For instance, it reminds Congress "That the
Constitution of the United States, having delegated to Congress a
power to punish treason, counterfeiting the securities and current
coin of the United States, piracies, and felonies committed on the
high seas, and offences against the law of nations, slavery, and no
other crimes whatsoever;. . . . . therefore all acts of Congress
which assume to create, define, or punish crimes, other than those so
enumerated in the Constitution are altogether void, and of no force;"

Federal gun crime laws? Void. Federal drug crime laws? Void. The
gazzillion other federal criminal laws that deal with anything other
than the specific enumerated crimes? ALL VOID.

One would think that if any lawyer anywhere in the entire country was
worth his salt, all federal criminal trials would have ended years
ago. This seems to prove that most lawyers are dullards.

New Hampshire deals a complete death blow to the pending federal hate
crimes legislation by pointing out "That, therefore, all acts of
Congress of the United States which do abridge the freedom of
religion, freedom of speech, freedom of the press, are not law, but
are altogether void, and of no force; . . . . ."

Later in the Resolution, New Hampshire makes clear what the feds are
now risking if they proceed further: The removal of all powers from
the federal government by the States!
Quoting directly from the Resolution: "That any Act by the Congress
of the United States, Executive Order of the President of the United
States of America or Judicial Order by the Judicatories of the United
States of America which assumes a power not delegated to the
government of United States of America by the Constitution for the
United States of America and which serves to diminish the liberty of
the any of the several States or their citizens shall constitute a
nullification of the Constitution for the United States of America by
the government of the United States of America. Acts which would
cause such a nullification include, but are not limited to:


I. Establishing martial law or a state of emergency within one of the
States comprising the United States of America without the consent of
the legislature of that State.

II. Requiring involuntary servitude, or governmental service other
than a draft during a declared war, or pursuant to, or as an
alternative to, incarceration after due process of law.

III. Requiring involuntary servitude or governmental service of
persons under the age of 18 other than pursuant to, or as an
alternative to, incarceration after due process of law.

IV. Surrendering any power delegated or not delegated to any
corporation or foreign government.

V. Any act regarding religion; further limitations on freedom of
political speech; or further limitations on freedom of the press.

VI. Further infringements on the right to keep and bear arms
including prohibitions of type or quantity of arms or ammunition; and

That should any such act of Congress become law or Executive Order or
Judicial Order be put into force, all powers previously delegated to
the United States of America by the Constitution for the United
States shall revert to the several States individually. "

Read the full New Hampshire Reesolution directly from the State
Government Web Site, Here:


http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/legislation/2009/HCR0006.html
p.s. from Protect Our Border: Oklahoma did something similar to this not to long ago. It
seems that states are gradually waking up and realizing that the federal government
has been abusing their power, and exceeding their Constitutional authority on 100's of
issues for decades now. Here it is word for word right out of the Constitution.
ARTICLE X
Rights of States Under Constitution
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited
by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
We are also still working on our collection of conservative emails for forwarding. Two
files are finished, and the third one is under construction. These are wordpad text files
that can easily be saved to your pc.
http://protectourborder.net/wakeup.rtf
http://protectourborder.net/wakeup2.rtf
http://protectourborder.net/wakeup3.rtf
We also have Gringo dollars that you can print out and send to any politician or
business who caters to Illegals. Someone did a fantastic job on it.
http://protectourborder.net/gringodollars.doc
We recommend that you forward the New Hampshire link to 10 of your most loyal State
Representatives, and let them know that the Feds have been exceeding their
Constitutional Authority for decades now.


Steve Hampton
www.protectourborder.net
www.protectourborder.net/jokes.rtf
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/protectourbordernow

Politics are all about compromise. Let's explain this numerically. On a scale of 1 to 10
with 1 being ultra conservative (pilgrim), and 10 being a fat head (Ted Kennedy). If you
vote for a 5, and they vote for a 10, then you will get a 7.5 average result in Congress.
The only solution is to vote for someone with a lower rating or more conservative than
yourself, and with normal political compromise you will eventually get what you want.
Liberals are choking on their laughter thinking you can't figure this out, but you just
did:)



7 STATES ARE PREPARING FOR SECESSION IF NECESSARY

Washington

http://apps.leg.wa.gov/documents/billdocs/2009-10/Pdf/Bills/House%20Join
t%20Memorials/4009-State%20sovereignty.pdf

New Hampshire

http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/legislation/2009/HCR0006.html

Arizona

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.printable&pageId=4015

http://www.azleg.state.az.us/legtext/44leg/2r/bills/hcr2034p.htm


Montana

http://data.opi.mt.gov/bills/2009/billhtml/HB0246.htm

Michigan

http://www.legislature.mi.gov/(S(21rmjiv1sl0wvw55yxurwl55))/documents/
2009-2010/Journal/House/pdf/2009-HJ-01-22-002.pdf

Missouri
http://www.house.mo.gov/content.aspx?info=/bills091/bills/HR212.HTM

Oklahoma
http://axiomamuse.wordpress.com/2009/01/07/state-legislator-charles-key-
wants-to-limit-federal-power/

Steve Hampton
www.protectourborder.net
www.protectourborder.net/jokes.rtf
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/protectourbordernow

Politics are all about compromise. Let's explain this numerically. On a scale of 1 to 10
with 1 being ultra conservative (pilgrim), and 10 being a fat head (Ted Kennedy). If you
vote for a 5, and they vote for a 10, then you will get a 7.5 average result in Congress.
The only solution is to vote for someone with a lower rating or more conservative than
yourself, and with normal political compromise you will eventually get what you want.
Liberals are choking on their laughter thinking you can't figure this out, but you just
did:)



Keep it moving, please, even if you've seen it before.
It is the VETERAN, not the preacher,
who has given us freedom of religion.

It is the VETERAN, not the reporter,
who has given us freedom of the press.

It is the VETERAN, not the poet,
who has given us freedom of speech.

It is the VETERAN, not the campus organizer,
who has given us freedom to assemble.

It is the VETERAN, not the lawyer,
who has given us the right to a ! fair trial.

It is the VETERAN, not the politician,
Who has given us the right to vote.


It is the VETERAN,
who salutes the Flag,


It is the veteran,
who serves under the Flag,


ETERNAL REST GRANT THEM O LORD, AND LET PERPETUAL
LIGHT SHINE UPON THEM.


I don't know if you saw this in the news but it really impressed me.
Funny, our US Senate/House took 2 days off as they couldn't work
because of the expected storm.
On the ABC evening news, it was reported tonight that, because of
the dangers from Hurricane Isabelle approaching Washington DC, the
military members assigned the duty of guarding the Tomb of the
Unknown Soldier were given permission to suspend the assignment.

They respectfully declined the offer, "No way, Sir!"



Soaked to the skin, marching in the pelting rain of a tropical storm,
they said that guarding the Tomb was not just an assignment; it was
the highest honor that can be afforded to a serviceperson.

The tomb has been patrolled continuously, 24/7, since 1930.

I don't usually suggest that many emails be forwarded, but I'd be
EXTREMELY proud if this one reached as many as possible. We can be
very proud of our young men and women in the service no matter
where they serve.


                               God Bless them all!!!


Steve Hampton
www.protectourborder.net
www.protectourborder.net/jokes.rtf
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/protectourbordernow

Politics are all about compromise. Let's explain this numerically. On a scale of 1 to 10
with 1 being ultra conservative (pilgrim), and 10 being a fat head (Ted Kennedy). If you
vote for a 5, and they vote for a 10, then you will get a 7.5 average result in Congress.
The only solution is to vote for someone with a lower rating or more conservative than
yourself, and with normal political compromise you will eventually get what you want.
Liberals are choking on their laughter thinking you can't figure this out, but you just
did:)
TB Is Coming Back Thanks to Immigration
According to the "Stop TB Now Act of 2007", which was introduced in
the US Senate on March 22, 2007 and now is being dealt with in the Committee
on Foreign Relations, more than 50% of all the TB-cases in the United States
are found in foreign-born individuals.

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/D?c110:1:./temp/~c110y2bTWe::
Quotes from Act S 968 IS
"Driven by the HIV/AIDS pandemic, incidence rates of tuberculosis in
Africa have more than doubled on average since 1990, making it the only
region in the world in which tuberculosis rates are not currently stabilized
or declining. The problem is so pervasive that in August 2005, African
Health Ministers and the World Health Organization (WHO) declared
tuberculosis to be an emergency in Africa.

"The wide extent of drug resistance, including both multi-drug
resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB ) and extensively drug resistant tuberculosis
(XDR-TB ), represents both a critical challenge to the global control of
tuberculosis and a serious worldwide public health threat.

"XDR-TB , which is characterized as being MDR-TB with additional
resistance to multiple second-line anti-tuberculosis drugs, is associated
with worst-treatment outcomes of any form of tuberculosis. XDR-TB is
converging with the HIV epidemic, undermining gains in HIV prevention and
treatment programs and requires urgent interventions.

"Drug resistance surveillance reports have confirmed the serious
scale and spread of tuberculosis with XDR-TB strains confirmed on six
continents.

"Demonstrating the lethality of XDR-TB, an initial outbreak in
Tugela Ferry, South Africa killed 52 of 53 patients with hundreds more cases
reported since. Of the world's regions, sub-Saharan Africa faces the
greatest gap in capacity to prevent, find, and treat XDR-TB .

More than 50% of all TB-cases in the US found in foreign-born
individuals:

"With more than 50 percent of tuberculosis cases in the United
States attributable to foreign-born individuals and with the increase in
international travel, commerce, and migration, elimination of tuberculosis
in the United States depends on efforts to control the disease in developing
countries. Recent research has shown that to invest in tuberculosis control
abroad, where treatment and program costs are significantly cheaper than in
the United States, would be a cost-effective strategy to reduce
tuberculosis-related morbidity and mortality domestically.
"The threat that tuberculosis poses for Americans derives from the
global spread of tuberculosis and the emergence and spread of strains of
multi-drug resistant tuberculosis and extensively drug resistant
tuberculosis, which are far more deadly, and more difficult and costly to
treat."

The Global Plan to Stop TB 2006-2015: Actions for Life is a
comprehensive plan developed by the Stop TB Partnership that sets out the
actions necessary to achieve the millennium development goal of cutting
tuberculosis deaths and disease burden in half by 2015 and thus eliminate
tuberculosis as a global health problem by 2050.

While innovations such as the Global Tuberculosis Drug Facility have
enabled low-income countries to treat a standard case of tuberculosis with
drugs that cost as little as $16 for a full course of treatment, there are
still millions of individuals with no access to effective treatment.)...)

"For the purpose of carrying out global tuberculosis activities
through the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, there are authorized
to be appropriated $70,000,000 for fiscal year 2008 and $100,000,000 for
fiscal year 2009. Such authorization of appropriations is in addition to
other authorizations of appropriations that are available for such purposes.
Amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations under
this section shall remain available until expended."

Read entire act on

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/D?c110:1:./temp/~c110y2bTWe::

Steve Hampton
www.protectourborder.net
www.protectourborder.net/jokes.rtf
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/protectourbordernow

Politics are all about compromise. Let's explain this numerically. On a scale of 1 to 10
with 1 being ultra conservative (pilgrim), and 10 being a fat head (Ted Kennedy). If you
vote for a 5, and they vote for a 10, then you will get a 7.5 average result in Congress.
The only solution is to vote for someone with a lower rating or more conservative than
yourself, and with normal political compromise you will eventually get what you want.
Liberals are choking on their laughter thinking you can't figure this out, but you just
did:)
No Drug Smuggler Left Behind!

by Ann Coulter

Posted: 06/13/2007

President Bush was so buoyed by the warm reception he was given in Albania that he
immediately gave all 3 million Albanians American citizenship, provided they learn
Spanish. The offer was withdrawn when Bush found out most Albanians haven't broken
any U.S. laws.

Bush keeps claiming he's dying to enforce the border, but he just can't do it unless we
immediately grant amnesty to 12 million illegal aliens. I wonder if that worked on Laura
Bush:

Laura: George, it's time you quit drinking.

George: OK, honey, let's discuss it over cocktails.

How about Bush enforce the border and then we'll discuss his amnesty plan?

He assures us that granting amnesty to millions of illegal immigrants already here won't
inspire millions more to run across the border because ... he's going to put infrared
lights at the border!

Well, that's a relief. What precisely will infrared lights do again? This is worse than those
fake cameras they sell at hardware stores to make it look like you have cameras outside
your house. We still need something or someone -- say, a wall or a Border Patrol agent
-- to stop the Mexicans illegally crossing the border as we watch them on the infrared
cameras.

Bush won't build a wall and he keeps prosecuting law enforcement officers who stop
illegal border crossers. But trust him: He'll get right on that border enforcement business
as soon as we grant amnesty to 12 million illegal aliens.

Ignacio Ramos and Jose Alonso Compean are normally the sort of Mexican-Americans
Bush would tear up at while promoting amnesty for illegal aliens. Both served in the
military and are taxpaying, law-abiding citizens. They've been risking their lives as
Border Patrol agents for years.

Ramos was nominated for Border Patrol Agent of the Year in 2005. His nomination
received a major setback when the Bush administration decided to put him in prison
instead. Ramos and Compean are now serving more than 10 years apiece in solitary
confinement for chasing a drug-running illegal alien back to Mexico.

Bush's pal, U.S. Attorney Johnny Sutton, gave immunity to a Mexican drug dealer
hauling a million dollars worth of drugs across the border so that the drug dealer could
testify against two Border Patrol agents who shot him in the buttocks.

The border patrol agents were presumed guilty of an unlawful shooting because they
neglected to fill out the proper paperwork. For busting a cap in the butt of a drug courier
crossing the border illegally -- who was so mortally wounded that he proceeded to
scamper back to Mexico -- they were supposed to spend five hours filling out
paperwork. This is what the Bush administration means when it talks about a
"cover-up." As U.S. prosecutor Debra Kanof said, "You have to report any discharge of
a firearm."

Intriguingly, Kanof also says: "The Border Patrol pursuit policy prohibits the pursuit of
someone." (Hence, the oft-heard warning of the border agent in hot pursuit, "Stop or I'll
... do absolutely nothing!") Can we apply this rule to meter maids and tax collectors? At
least now border agents will be able to watch the illegal aliens they can't pursue on
infrared cameras!

But wait -- that's not all! The Border Patrol agents also exceeded the speed limit. "In
order to exceed the speed limit," Kanof said, "you have to get supervisor approval, and
they did not." It's just so hard to fill out a written request to exceed the speed limit when
you're off-roading at 65 mph. There's a whispering campaign suggesting that Ramos
and Compean failed to use their turn signal.

As I understand it, you're also supposed to not cross the border illegally from Mexico
with a van full of drugs. But the Bush administration has no interest in enforcing those
laws. Ninety-eight percent of illegal aliens captured crossing the border illegally are not
prosecuted. Those drugs are doing the job American drugs just won't do!

The Bush administration pulls out the big guns only for serious violations like a Border
Patrol officer not filling out paperwork.

In addition to giving the illegal alien drug smuggler full immunity to testify against U.S.
Border Patrol agents, the government gave him taxpayer-funded medical care for his
buttocks wound, an unconditional border-crossing card, the right to sue the U.S. for
"civil rights" violations, and a GAP gift card. The drug runner is also on the short-list to
replace Attorney General Alberto Gonzales.

He's now suing the U.S. for $5 million, but the Bush administration is hoping to bargain
him down to $10 million.

That border-crossing card came in handy when the winged illegal alien brought in
another load of drugs a short eight months later -- for which he has still not been
charged, nearly two years later. Who does he think he is? Rep. William Jefferson?

Bush's pal Sutton keeps defending his decision to prosecute Border Patrol agents for
paperwork violations, rather than an illegal alien for drug trafficking, on the grounds that
the drug dealer has not been charged with any crimes. Let's see, whose job is it to
charge that Mexican drug runner with a crime? Why, I believe that would be Johnny
Sutton!

Maybe Sutton was too busy prosecuting another Mexican-American law enforcement
officer for trying to stop illegal aliens from crossing our border. Deputy Sheriff Gilmer
Hernandez shot at the tires of a van full of illegal aliens, inadvertently wounding one of
them. Sutton prosecuted Hernandez. The government proceeded to give the illegal
aliens green cards and $100,000 each.

I didn't realize "living in the shadows" meant in the shadows of palm trees around the
pools at taxpayer-funded houses.

Illegal aliens might want to rethink Bush's amnesty plan. The only Hispanics Bush
seems to prosecute are the ones who are law-abiding U.S. citizens.

http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=21129


Steve Hampton
www.protectourborder.net
www.protectourborder.net/jokes.rtf
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/protectourbordernow

Politics are all about compromise. Let's explain this numerically. On a scale of 1 to 10
with 1 being ultra conservative (pilgrim), and 10 being a fat head (Ted Kennedy). If you
vote for a 5, and they vote for a 10, then you will get a 7.5 average result in Congress.
The only solution is to vote for someone with a lower rating or more conservative than
yourself, and with normal political compromise you will eventually get what you want.
Liberals are choking on their laughter thinking you can't figure this out, but you just
did:)



   Thought for the day:

   "Calling an illegal alien an "undocumented immigrant" is like

   calling a drug dealer an "unlicensed pharmacist."

Steve Hampton
www.protectourborder.net
www.protectourborder.net/jokes.rtf
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/protectourbordernow
Politics are all about compromise. Let's explain this numerically. On a scale of 1 to 10
with 1 being ultra conservative (pilgrim), and 10 being a fat head (Ted Kennedy). If you
vote for a 5, and they vote for a 10, then you will get a 7.5 average result in Congress.
The only solution is to vote for someone with a lower rating or more conservative than
yourself, and with normal political compromise you will eventually get what you want.
Liberals are choking on their laughter thinking you can't figure this out, but you just
did:)


Dear Mr. President
On the White House homepage you have a list of myth/facts regarding the immigration
bill that are not only erroneous but out and out false. Below I have listed the myth/facts
in the opinion of most of the American people. This is proven by the recent Rasmussen
poll that shows only a mere 26% of American voters favor this bill while nearly 50%
oppose it (see link). I'm pretty sure the Senators realize that this large of a majority can
and will have a drastic effect on election day.
Rasmussen Reportsâ„¢: The most comprehensive public opinion coverage ever
provided for a mid-term election.
1. MYTH: This is not amnesty.
   FACT: The bill takes an approach similar to that of the 1986 immigration law.
   President Reagan backed that law... and called it amnesty. So does Black's Law
   Dictionary, which says, 'the 1986 Immigration Reform and Control Act provided
   amnesty for undocumented aliens already in the country.'"
   The Administration says it" not amnesty because illegal aliens will be "punished,"
   i.e., they'll have to pay a $1,000 fine. That" not enough to cover the government"
   processing costs. In return, people who have entered the country illegally would
   get to (1) stay here permanently, (2) gain immediate entitlement to government
   assistance and benefits and (3) bring their families over as well. This is beyond
   amnesty. It doesn't just forgive criminal behavior, it rewards it.

2. MYTH: This proposal does not repeat the mistakes of the 1986 Immigration
Reform and Control Act.
   FACT: This proposal exacerbates those mistakes. The 1986 law approved
   amnesty for 3 million immigrants in exchange for "greatly strengthened" border
   security and law enforcement. This bill would provide amnesty three to four times
   as many illegals, while offering the same empty promises to beef up
   enforcement.
   The 1986 law gave temporary resident status to most illegals who could show
   they'd lived here continuously for five years. The new proposal would do this for
   anyone who" lived here for the last five months. The only "proof" required: an
   affidavit signed by anyone other than a blood relative of the applicant, and a
   second, equally non-secure document.
3. MYTH: The government will crack down on the hiring of illegal workers.
   FACT: You can't "crack down" on something that doesn't exist. And all but a
   handful of illegal workers will become magically legal within 24 hours of applying
   for the new Z-visa. Even when an illegal is found to be ineligible for a Z-visa, the
   proposal states "nothing in this paragraph shall require the Secretary to
   commence removal proceedings against an alien." There" also a huge loophole
   that waves current deportation requirements due to "humanitarian
   circumstances."
4. MYTH: This proposal would not cut in half the amount of fence built by the
Secure Fence Act of 2006.
   FACT: The Secure Fence Act authorized 700 miles of new fencing along the
   U.S.-Mexico border. The proposal would implement the new temporary worker
   and Z visa programs once the feds have installed at least 370 miles of fencing.
   So the White House is correct. It wouldn't cut fencing by "half," only by 47
   percent.
5. MYTH: The trigger period will not cause a rush to the border.
   FACT: Limiting amnesty "only" to those who entered the country illegally prior to
   Jan. 1, does nothing to stem the rush to the border. Since illegals can get a Z
   visa on the basis of only two easily-manufactured documents, fraudulent
   documentation will keep the stream of illegal aliens flowing. All the trigger period
   does is create an incentive for today" illegals to claim they've been illegal since
   Jan. 1.
6. MYTH: By providing an opportunity for citizenship to illegal aliens already here,
the bill will not exponentially increase extended-family chain migration.
   FACT: In granting immediate amnesty to so many millions, the bill will
   dramatically accelerate family chain migration over the next six years. At that
   point, the proposal purports to replace family chain migration with skill-based
   immigration preferences. That change may or may not occur. Meanwhile, the bill
   establishes a brand-new opening for chain migration: "family members in
   hardship cases."
7. MYTH: The temporary worker program is good for American workers.
   FACT: By creating both the Z visa program and the Y visa program (for future
   temporary workers), the proposal sets the stage for millions of new workers to
   enter the labor market, potentially depressing wages.
   Meanwhile, the influx of workers will increase demand for higher taxes. The bill
   would allow guest workers to bring their spouses and children into the U.S.
   These children would be entitled to free education (average taxpayer cost:
   $9,600 per child). Plus any child born to a guest worker here is deemed a U.S.
   citizen with guaranteed lifetime entitlement to more than 60 different federal
   welfare programs.
8. MYTH: Illegal aliens will not come onto the welfare rolls.
   FACT: As soon as illegals get Z-visa status, they become eligible for free
   medical care under Medicaid and their children are immediately entitled to
   welfare. After five years in Lawful Permanent Resident status, amnesty recipients
   become eligible for nearly all 60 federal welfare programs including food stamps,
   public housing, and Temporary Assistance to Needy Families.
9. MYTH: Government agencies will be able to share information to pursue
immigration violators.
   FACT: True and false. Unless a background check turns up something criminal
   about a Z visa applicant within 24 hours after the initial paperwork is submitted,
   enforcement agencies are blocked from pursuing deportation for a full year.
   The bill also gives the Secretary of Homeland Security authority to require a
   national ID card... for all citizens.
10. MYTH: Senators can cast an informed vote on the bill today.
   FACT: Senators did not receive even a draft of the bill until 2 a.m.
   Saturday--leaving them less than three days to read and understand this
   complex and convoluted proposal before being forced to vote to bring it to the
   floor. Only after that vote will they receive a final copy of the proposal--legislation
   that will affect American security, our economy culture for generations to come.
   The bill" proponents are pressing for a vote on final passage -- without
   congressional hearings, committee mark-up, fiscal analysis, expert testimony, or
   public comment -- before the Memorial Day recess. So much for due diligence by
   "the world" greatest deliberative body."
   Mr. President any bill that grants citizenship to anyone here illegally will be
   rejected by the American public and is amnesty no matter how you try to spin it
   by making them pay a paltry fine. What an insult to American citizens and LEGAL
   immigrants. The American public has expressed their opinion loud and clear.
   When will you get it? Our country is not for sale.
   Thank you,
   Erik VanDusen


Steve Hampton
www.protectourborder.net
www.protectourborder.net/jokes.rtf
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/protectourbordernow
Politics are all about compromise. Let's explain this numerically. On a scale of 1 to 10
with 1 being ultra conservative (pilgrim), and 10 being a fat head (Ted Kennedy). If you
vote for a 5, and they vote for a 10, then you will get a 7.5 average result in Congress.
The only solution is to vote for someone with a lower rating or more conservative than
yourself, and with normal political compromise you will eventually get what you want.
Liberals are choking on their laughter thinking you can't figure this out, but you just
did:)


Certain Death Of
The United States
By Frosty Wooldridge
6-15-7

Did you hear the story on Mitt Romney that proves amusing? He talks on
gays, guns, abortion, immigration and the war in Iraq. Like many shyster
politicians he flip-flops faster than a pancake cook at I-HOP. We must view
Romney and all politicians like a popular summer footwear: Crocs!

Let's face it; Senator Teddy Kennedy symbolizes the Typhoid Mary of
immigration. He infected this nation with the 1965 Immigration Reform Act.
He injected us with the 1986 amnesty and today, he plunges a dagger into the
heart of our civilization with S. 1348.

He's not alone. While Kennedy did nothing to uphold our laws following
1986, Senator John McCain proves the Charles Manson of the Iraq War and
immigration. Let's keep bombing Iraq for the sake of killing while we
masochistically eviscerate ourselves with an unending line of poor, killers,
rapists, misfits, drug dealers and child molesters. Of course, they break
into America for a better life!

Senator Harry Reid represents an out of touch, clueless and an
Alzheimer's victim that can't remember which country he serves. Senator
Arlen Specter (D-PA), 75, thinks red/white/green make up the colors of
America's flag. Senator Mel Martinez of Florida thinks Cuba should annex the
Sunshine State. Senator Jon Kyl of Arizona can't grab his butt cheeks with
both hands as he panders to 20 million illegal aliens.

None of them deals with reality that common American citizens face
daily across our nation. None of them send their kids to already conquered
California schools or live in our new felony infested barrios. None of them
face the crime, TB and drunk drivers on our highways that kill us daily.

Last week, Newt Gingrich rendered the best five points as to why S.
1348 failed:
1. The Proposed Bill Is Based on a Fantasy and Could Never Be
Effectively Implemented: It is outrageous when the federal government is so
incompetent it has to suspend passport requirements for Mexico and Canada
while at the same time suggesting it will be able to process a "Z" visa for
12 million-plus illegal immigrants in one day.

While American citizens are waiting up to three months or longer for
the federal government to process their passports, illegal aliens could get
a 'Z' visa within 24 hours under the hopefully dead Amnesty Bill.
Outrageous! The system is beyond broken when we cannot prioritize the needs
of citizens before the desires of non-citizen lawbreakers.

2.The Attempt to Blackmail the American People by Threatening to
Refuse to Enforce the Law Without a New Bill Is Disgraceful: A number of
powerful figures in the Bush Administration and in the Senate have been
saying that if we do not agree to pass this destructive bill, they will
never enforce the law.

3. Americans Do Not Change Our Values to Fit Government Failures: When
Secretary of Homeland Security Michael Chertoff said that we had to "bow to
the reality" of millions of people being here illegally, he illustrated the
difference between Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan as President.

4.Why Should Any American Believe That This Government Will Keep Its
Word and Do Better This Time? We now hear from the President that we have
failed to control the border and failed to enforce the law on employers, and
therefore, we need a new law to replace the law we have been failing to
enforce. The Simpson-Mazzoli immigration law passed 20 years ago promised
the same things. Guess what? Teddy Kennedy lied just like he did at
Chappaquiddick.

The fact is, Bush failed to secure our borders. Kennedy and McCain
failed to abide by their oaths of office. As Kennedy drove the car over a
bridge, he killed only one woman. Today, he's about to kill an entire
civilization. (FW)

And this raises another question: Who has been running the government
for the last six years? Why do we think anything will change and that the
law will now suddenly be enforced? Over the last six years, the three
recently arrested New Jersey terrorists who had been here illegally for 23
years had a total of 75 charges by the local police, and yet not once was
our immigration enforcement infrastructure able to identify that they were
here illegally. And now we are told that with the new comprehensive
immigration bill, we will start to enforce the law against those have come
here illegally after Jan. 1, 2007.
Under the proposed law, will local, state and federal officials really
try to distinguish between those who came to the U.S. illegally prior to
Jan. 1, 2007 (eligible under the proposed law for amnesty), and those who
have arrived here illegally -- or those who overstay their visas -- after
Jan. 1, 2007 (not eligible for the proposed amnesty)? The case of the 75
prior interactions with police of the Fort Dix terrorists demonstrates that
we currently are incapable of identifying people here illegally. If 12 to
20 million are amnestied, who is seriously going to try and distinguish
between the old illegal and the new illegal?

5. This Is a Fight for America's Future: Your senator needs to
understand that this is the key fight over America's future and returning to
a law-abiding, effectively enforced, serious government worthy of the
American people. Let them know they can be with the vast majority of
Americans and kill the bill or they can side with the special interests and
try to ram through this extraordinarily destructive bill. www.numbersusa.com

There you have it from a Washington inside-the-beltway shyster
himself. If a shyster can spell it out, wow, what a concept! I've been
saying the same thing for a decade.

At the very least, if that bill passes with Bush's Kervorkian mission
to kill this nation, and as he said, "pass this product," we will see this
country bleed to death and overdose on legal and illegal immigrants from a
line that never ends. Robert Rector of the Heritage Foundation said, "This
bill will cost the American taxpayer $2.3 trillion if it's only 12 million."
It'll add two million legal immigrants annually, 400,000 Z-visas, 380,000
annual anchor babies, unending chain migration and swell the ranks of the
poor into the millions. Its final "product" will add 100 million people to
the United States by 2040. (Source: Fogel/Martin 2006, U.S. Population
Projections)

This bill, 33 years hence, will prove certain mortality of America.

Steve Hampton
www.protectourborder.net
www.protectourborder.net/jokes.rtf
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/protectourbordernow

Politics are all about compromise. Let's explain this numerically. On a scale of 1 to 10
with 1 being ultra conservative (pilgrim), and 10 being a fat head (Ted Kennedy). If you
vote for a 5, and they vote for a 10, then you will get a 7.5 average result in Congress.
The only solution is to vote for someone with a lower rating or more conservative than
yourself, and with normal political compromise you will eventually get what you want.
Liberals are choking on their laughter thinking you can't figure this out, but you just
did:)



Subject: China to Build Trucks for America in Tijuana in 2009!!!

As reported on Lou Dobbs today -

Unbelievable!! China has found a way to exploit NAFTA and build 150,000
trucks and SUVs per year at an assembly plant just across the border (what's
left of it anyway) and sell them in America tariff free! They plan to sell
at least 37,000 vehicles in America starting in '09 and they already have
contracts with car dealers in 7 states. The rest they will sell in Latin
America and Europe.

If China exported vehicles directly from China they would have to pay a 25%
tariff, but now there will be NO tariff thanks to our wonderful "free trade"
agreements with Mexico. The Chinese company promises these vehicles will be
cheaper than other vehicles available in America. Duhhhh!

All part of the coming North American Union and the death of the American
Middle Class..... and Bush wants even more free trade agreements. Has this
guy gone insane or what???

Steve Hampton
www.protectourborder.net
www.protectourborder.net/jokes.rtf
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/protectourbordernow

Politics are all about compromise. Let's explain this numerically. On a scale of 1 to 10
with 1 being ultra conservative (pilgrim), and 10 being a fat head (Ted Kennedy). If you
vote for a 5, and they vote for a 10, then you will get a 7.5 average result in Congress.
The only solution is to vote for someone with a lower rating or more conservative than
yourself, and with normal political compromise you will eventually get what you want.
Liberals are choking on their laughter thinking you can't figure this out, but you just
did:)



Just one of the many pay backs in the stimulus bill

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi's home district includes San Francisco.
Star-Kist Tuna's headquarters are in San Francisco, Pelosi's home district.
Star-Kist is owned by Del Monte Foods and is a major contributor to Pelosi.
Star-Kist is the major employer in American Samoa employing 75% of the
Samoan work force. Paul Pelosi, Nancy 's husband, owns $17 million dollars
of Star-Kist. In January, 2007 when the minimum wage was increased from
$5.15 to $7.25, Pelosi had American Samoa exempted from the increase so
Del Monte would not have to pay the higher wage. This would make Del
Monte products less expensive than their competition's. Last week when the
huge bailout bill was passed, Pelosi added an earmark to the final bill adding
$33 million dollars for an 'economic development credit in American Samoa.'
Pelosi has called the Bush Administration "CORRUPT?"


How do you spell "HYPOCRISY??" EVERY AMERICAN SHOULD GET THIS
E-MAIL.


Steve Hampton
www.protectourborder.net
www.protectourborder.net/jokes.rtf
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/protectourbordernow

Politics are all about compromise. Let's explain this numerically. On a scale of 1 to 10
with 1 being ultra conservative (pilgrim), and 10 being a fat head (Ted Kennedy). If you
vote for a 5, and they vote for a 10, then you will get a 7.5 average result in Congress.
The only solution is to vote for someone with a lower rating or more conservative than
yourself, and with normal political compromise you will eventually get what you want.
Liberals are choking on their laughter thinking you can't figure this out, but you just
did:)


More Quotable Quotes
1. In my many years I have come to a conclusion that one useless man is a shame, two
is a law firm and three or more is a congress. - John Adams
2. If you don't read the newspaper you are uninformed, if you do read the newspaper
you are misinformed. - Mark Twain3. Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you
were a member of Congress. But then I repeat myself. - Mark Twain
4. I contend that for a nation to try to tax itself into prosperity is like a man standing in a
bucket and trying to lift himself up by the handle. - Winston Churchill
(The same can be said for a nation who tries to spend it's way to prosperity with bailouts
and stimulus packages, while they are already in debt.)
5. A government which robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of
Paul. - George Bernard Shaw
6. A liberal is someone who feels a great debt to his fellow man, which debt he
proposes to pay off with your money. - G. Gordon Liddy
7. Democracy must be something more than two wolves and a sheep voting on what to
have for dinner. - James Bovard, Civil Libertarian (1994)
8. Foreign aid might be defined as a transfer of money from poor people in rich
countries to rich people in poor countries. - Douglas Casey, Classmate of Bill Clinton at
Georgetown University
9. Giving money and power to government is like giving whiskey and car keys to
teenage boys. - P.J. O'Rourke, Civil Libertarian
10. Government is the great fiction, through which everybody endeavors to live at the
expense of everybody else. - Frederic Bastiat, French Economist (1801-1850)
11. Government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it
moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it. - Ronald
Reagan (1986)
12. I don't make jokes. I just watch the government and report the facts. - Will Rogers
13. If you think health care is expensive now, wait until you see what it costs when it's
free! - P.J. O'Rourke
14. In general, the art of government consists of taking as much money as possible
from one party of the citizens to give to the other. - Voltaire (1764)
15. Just because you do not take an interest in politics doesn't mean politics won't take
an interest in you! - Pericles (430 B.C.)
16. No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session. - Mark
Twain (1866)
17. Talk is cheap.except when Congress does it. - Anonymous
18. The government is like a baby's alimentary canal, with a happy appetite at one end
and no responsibility at the other. - Ronald Reagan
19. The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of the blessings. The inherent
blessing of socialism is the equal sharing of misery. - Winston Churchill
20. The only difference between a tax man and a taxidermist is that the taxidermist
leaves the skin. - Mark Twain
21. The ultimate result of shielding men from the effects of folly is to fill the world with
fools. - Herbert Spencer, English Philosopher (1820-1903)
22. There is no distinctly Native American criminal class. Save Congress. - Mark Twain
23. What this country needs are more unemployed politicians. - Edward Langley, Artist
(1928-1995)
24. A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong enough to take
everything you have. - Thomas Jefferson
25. In the American political system, both parties devote their energy to proving the
other party is fit to rule. And both parties are right. - H.L. Mencken
26. Once a government is committed to the principle of silencing the voice of opposition,
it has only one way to go, and that is down the path of increasingly repressive
measures, until it becomes a source of terror to all its citizens and creates a country
where everyone lives in fear. - Harry S.Truman
27. Stimulus is where the government gives a smidgen of your tax dollars back to you
making you feel so good about yourself [stimulated] that you want to run out to Wal-Mart
and buy a new Chinese-made HDTV and go home and watch Telemundo!
28. The main difference between socialism and communism, is that with socialism, you
get to vote in the people who take most of your paycheck.
29. For decades now, people have been on food stamps and other assistance, while
making payments on new cars. With socialised medicine, how long do you think it will
be before even more people are able to buy a new car while we pay for their
healthcare???
30. When the government creates jobs with more spending, they have to take more and
more of your paycheck in taxes or pass the debt on to our children which means they
are giving billions in interest payments to wealthy people here and abroad and to other
countries, not to mention still owing the debt.
When private industry creates jobs, you actually receive a product or a service when
they take your money. Now which would you rather have?
31. Terrorism is like a cancer. You can't just hope that it will go away. You have to hunt
it down and kill it.
32. Free men own guns. Slaves don't.

Steve Hampton
www.protectourborder.net
www.protectourborder.net/jokes.rtf
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/protectourbordernow

Politics are all about compromise. Let's explain this numerically. On a scale of 1 to 10
with 1 being ultra conservative (pilgrim), and 10 being a fat head (Ted Kennedy). If you
vote for a 5, and they vote for a 10, then you will get a 7.5 average result in Congress.
The only solution is to vote for someone with a lower rating or more conservative than
yourself, and with normal political compromise you will eventually get what you want.
Liberals are choking on their laughter thinking you can't figure this out, but you just
did:)


Have We Become a Nation of Wimps?
"There is only one tactical principle which is not subject to change. It is to use the
means at hand to inflict the maximum amount of wound, death, and destruction on the
enemy in the minimum amount of time." - General George S. Patton
Do we now shrink from our enemies? Do we cower in fear at the thought of battle? Do
we run from those that would destroy us if they could and are trying very hard to do it?
Do we convey to our enemies our strategies, troop strength, military hardware and time
tables? Do we now tip toe into the skirmish with a limited response and not engage the
forces necessary to win an immediate victory? Does it take 90 days to make up our
minds on how we are going to fight a war that we have been engaged in for eight
years?
Do we appoint generals to do the job of winning the war and then ignore them when
they tell us how to win that war? Are there no men left who have the courage and the
stomach to show the bully the door? Has America and Americans descended to the
level of that girly organization known as "Code Pink"? Have we lost our collective
minds?
General Eisenhower and the other generals of D-day went to great lengths to fool Hitler
into thinking we would land at Calais instead of Normandy. Their diversion was
ultimately successful. They then launched one of the largest land invasions in the
history of man. It was not a timid response. It was a massive response with a massive
force delivered in stealth, because that is the true strategy of war, if victory is to be
achieved. The factis, you cannot be victorious if all you do is pin prick the enemy, as we
did in the stages of the Iraq war after defeating Saddam Hussein and are now doing in
Afghanistan.
We did not re-build nations until we had brought the enemy to its knees. We did not
capitulate to the surrender conditions of the enemy when they started to lose. We
required unconditional surrender. Anything less would have rendered meaningless the
sacrifice of hundreds of thousands of brave American men and women, who gave their
lives, their limbs and some their minds, to the horror of war.
To render an enemy impotent, you must take away the weapons of war. To do that you
must destroy the place where the raw materials are stored, or in transport and where
the weapons are manufactured. But it is not enough to just destroy the weapons, you
must also dry up, lock up, or destroy the resource that funds the weapons of war,
money. So why then haven't we destroyed the poppy fields in Afghanistan that provides
the money that the Taliban uses to buy those weapons? Are we afraid of offending the
Afghan people so much that we would allow the Taliban to fund the weapons from that
poppy crop that end up killing and maiming our brave American soldiers? Do we care
more about the Afghan people who still live as tribes did 2,000 years ago, than the
Americans we send to fight that stupid war that we refuse to win?
Why do we not approach any war engaged by America, in the same manner as we did
in World War II? One of the greatest and most productive nations on Earth gave the
maximum effort so that brutal tyranny and evil would not survive among men. Millions of
proud men and women were lost in that war, but millions more were saved from
domination and perpetual slavery. How can we do less now?
President Reagan did not shrink in fear of the Soviet Union. He challenged it. He was in
their face almost daily. He did not pussyfoot around Gorbachev. He did not appease or
apologize to the Soviets. He said in very strong words, on German soil: "Mr. Gorbachev,
tear down that wall!" and Gorbachev did. Reagan did not dismantle our war machinery
and our army, marines, navy and airforce. He rebuilt them, stronger than before. His
position to the rest of the world was that of strength, not weakness. He did not bow to
world leaders as this college kid sitting in the president's chair, has done.
Americans and most of the Western nations are facing an enemy of millions that have
absolutely no compunction about cutting off heads and hands, or other body parts. The
leaders of this cult forces women into a life not much better than cattle in the field, for a
religious ideology that relishes killing for killing's sake and takes glee in the subjugation
of people. It cares not one whit about the Geneva Convention. It brutally sacrifices the
lives of women and children with indiscriminate people and car bombs to make a
political point and to inflict fear and intimidation among the populace.
This enemy is reproducing at greater than replacement levels throughout the world and
their irrational religious fervor is being indoctrinated in all new lives from birth to death.
They learn that death in support of their faith and to "kill" non-believers, is glorious and
to be rewarded. Time means nothing to them, only achieving their ultimate goal of
conquering the world, even if it takes a hundred years. They learn that their way is the
only way and all who do not, or will not capitulate to "their" way, must be conquered or
destroyed. Their mentality is that of the warlords of a time that other cultures have long
since passed by. The only thing they understand is a force greater than theirs. They
mock weakness and fear strength.
If we refuse to confront this enemy with the full force of our military might and
production, no matter where it is, starting right now, by shear numbers, in time, they will
conquer us and the world will be theirs for a thousand years. America, the Founding
Fathers, the Constitution, freedom, liberty, Christianity, Judaism, Buddhism and
Hinduism will have been erased forever from the pages of the history books, now
written by those who set out to destroy all who would not bow down to their whims. Yes,
it is that serious and as in all wars, half measures, as delivered by this in-experienced,
naive and narcissistic President a few nights ago, will get us killed.
We do not bow to our friends or negotiate with our enemies, unless we are negotiating
the terms of surrender. We are not better than they, but we are definitely equal. America
is a great nation and has done more to uplift the entire world into the 21st Century than
any other nation on Earth. We are a proud land and a proud people and we have every
right to be proud. Have we made mistakes? Sure. But we do not need to apologize to
anyone or any nation, because our achievements and what we have contributed to the
people of this planet, far outweigh our mistakes.
Are we a nation of wimps? Most Americans are not, but our leaders sure seem to be.
May they rot in Hell for the damage they have done and will continue to do to our
cherished America, if we let them!
"Terrorism is like a cancer. You can't just hope that it will go away. You have to hunt it
down and kill it."


Steve Hampton
www.protectourborder.net
www.protectourborder.net/jokes.rtf
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/protectourbordernow

Politics are all about compromise. Let's explain this numerically. On a scale of 1 to 10
with 1 being ultra conservative (pilgrim), and 10 being a fat head (Ted Kennedy). If you
vote for a 5, and they vote for a 10, then you will get a 7.5 average result in Congress.
The only solution is to vote for someone with a lower rating or more conservative than
yourself, and with normal political compromise you will eventually get what you want.
Liberals are choking on their laughter thinking you can't figure this out, but you just
did:)


Personal Intro for Frosty's Article Below:
This is a very good article, and expands on my thoughts about Americans burying their
heads in the sand on energy, and overpopulation issues. There is no possible way we
can ever become energy independent unless we begin right now to control our
population growth, and most people would agree that the key to our long term prosperity
is energy independence. It is a democratic deception that wind and solar power will
solve all of our problems. The wind doesn't always blow, and the sun doesn't always
shine, and there is no practical way to store energy on a massive scale. The democrats
are also the ones who led the charge on global warming, but yet they refuse to build
nuclear power plants that would have the greatest impact on minimizing global warming,
by eliminating coal fired power plants. In Oklahoma, they are estimating natural Gas will
run out in 50 years, and if we don't act now by building a nuclear power plant, there will
be a lot of people including children freezing their hineys off.

We are also 6% of the worlds population, but we use 26% of the world's energy, and yet
the democrats have no plans to reduce our population growth from Immigration. This is
the one country in the world that should not have an economy based on population
growth. Which is what they have done, since they began outsourcing our manufacturing
capacity thanks to free trade agreements.
This means that illegal immigration must be stopped (no more amnesties), the 1965
Immigration and Naturalization Act that vastly increased immigration must be nullified,
and the birthright citizenship law must be changed. If we wait any longer, English
speaking Christians will become a minority group in our own land. The attachment is a
pic of a book cover written back in 1995 about this very issue. Today, they have already
made efforts to implement sharia law in England, and they are talking about long term
efforts to do it here. The difference between Christian fundamentalists, and Islamic
radicals, is that Christians won't cut your head off if you don't believe the way they do
and/or refuse to stop your car and pray to Mecca 5 times a day. I would suggest you
join our efforts.
http://protectourborder.net/storm.JPG
I would also advise you to boycott the economy no matter how much it may hurt us,
since this seems to be the only way to wake America up to the disastrous leadership we
have had. Americans are so gullible, they still think spending money we don't have and
taxing peter to pay paul will create prosperity. That's like jumping into a bucket when
you're in the hole, and trying to lift yourself out. Another example is let's say your child
loses his job, so you charge up your credit card to pay him a salary and keep him going.
Well eventually, not only will that have to be paid back in full, you will also have to pay
interest as well. On top of that he wlll still end up losing his job, when you run out of
credit. That's exactly what the government is doing, instead of addressing the
underlying issues that have caused this collapse which are free trade, and Illegal
immigration.

I would recommend you join www.numbersusa.com and www.afa.net and whatever you
do, don't be afraid to forward this type of mail to everyone you know. 80% of us do
agree with you, and if you are more concerned about offending someone with no
common sense, than you are concerned about the future of your country, and the future
of your descendants, then may God forgive you for helping to destroy a Christian nation.

There is also a major disconnect between people who join us, and people who
contribute money. No one is asking you to contribute more than you can afford, but it
does take money to win these battles, and support loyal political candidates. Just do like
I do, and pick 3 or 4 organizations, contributing $25 to only one of them each month. No
one person can do it by themselves anyway


IMMIGRATION AND ENERGY: SOME INCONVENIENT TRUTHS

By Frosty Wooldridge
February 16, 2009
NewsWithViews. com

How can an entire civilization, with instant mass communication, cram
its head into the sand in order to avoid the obvious? How can leaders at
every level maintain abject denial? How do individual citizens slink by the
'apparent'?

Dr. Anthrop, Professor of Environmental Studies, San Jose State
University, and consultant for www.capsweb. org in California wrote a
stunningly sobering report in the Spring 2007 issue of The Contract
Quarterly, www.thesocialcontra ct.com , page 158: "Immigration and Energy:
Some Inconvenient Truths."

What big dilemma faces California? After having reached many
environmental goals as to per capita energy use, Anthrop said, "adding
602,000 people on their way to growing from 37 million to 57 million,
negates all progress that has been made so far."

Note that California adds 1,650 people, net gain, every 24 hours! They
add 400 cars 24/7!

"Environmentalists would like Americans to believe that SUVs and
pickup trucks are responsible for America's growing oil consumption and that
the increase in greenhouse gas emissions could be halted if only the U.S.
switched from fossil fuels to 'renewable' energy," Dr. Anthrop said. "and,
if Congress raised the fuel economy standards for motor vehicles."

Knock, knock! Is anybody home?

"The reality is rather different," Anthrop said. "In the first place,
both energy consumption and gasoline consumption in the U.S. are being
driven almost entirely by population growth. U.S. per capita energy
consumption in 2005 has changed little from 1974. The 35 percent increase in
energy consumption during this time period was due almost entirely to the 83
million people added to the U.S. population."

America housed 194 million people in 1963, but added 106 million in
just 43 years by October 2006. Since the US female averaged 2.03 births
since 1970, what caused our terrific population growth?

Immigration, immigration, I-M-M-I-G-R- A-T-I-O-N! What will add another
100 million people in the next 36 years by 2035?

Tut, tut, tut! You guessed it: immigration!

Anybody in the United States possess any idea of how we might deal
with our impending energy shortfalls? How about accelerating air pollution?
Perhaps you have a solution for saving 2,500 species of plants and animals
that will suffer extinction in the coming decade in the lower 48 states
because of habitat encroachment from the loss of millions of acres of
habitat? Who will bravely discuss our increasingly contaminated rivers from
farm chemical run-off? What about cities exploding beyond carrying capacity
called 'overshoot'? How about our looming water shortages? "It is worth
noting that 14 percent of the U.S. corn crop is irrigated and consumes 18
million acre-feet of water annually?most of which is over-drafted from the
Ogallala aquifer in the Great Plains. To put this into perspective, the
average annual flow of the Colorado River is only 14 MAF," Anthrop said.


As Obama, who voted for the 2007 amnesty, pushes for another amnesty,
we may expect a population increase of 62 million by 2026.

"If per capita gasoline consumption remains constant," Anthrop said,
"this population growth will increase gasoline consumption by 695 million
barrels per year. If corn ethanol were to supply the 62 million people added
to the U.S., corn acreage would have to be increased by 117 million
acres?which equals 25 percent of all U.S. cropland. Growing a crop that
results in soil erosion nine-fold just to support immigration of more people
into the U.S. hardly qualifies for a sustainable policy."

Unfortunately, in fact, catastrophically, if we add the predicted 100
million by 2035, green house carbon dioxide emissions will increase 21 to 30
percent. All of it will amplify acid rain!

Ironically, "Many of the same members of the U.S. Senate who
complained about global warming and America's addition to oil also supported
S.2611 to bring in more immigrants as well as give amnesty to the estimated
20 million already in the U.S.," Anthrop said.

Does anyone see a disconnect here? Am I one of the few Americans that
sees our civilization on a collision course with itself? Wouldn't you think
that Senator John McCain might see it? How about Senator Mel Martinez,
Kennedy, Burris, Webb, Durbin, Specter, Byrd or the rest of those 100 of
this country's alleged finest men and women in the U.S. Senate? Are they all
brain dead? Do you see one national leader mentioning what we face let alone
dealing with it?

Guess what? Not one! Not the president, not the Senate, not the House,
not one governor, not one mayor of any major city.

I shake my head in consummate exasperation at the stupidity of our
civilization. Let's just run this puppy right over a cliff. Let's watch our
children dangle at the end of a rope in the future. All because we refused
to speak up about the obvious!

"The cheap oil age created an artificial bubble of plentitude for a
period not much longer than a human lifetime.... so I hazard to assert that
as oil ceases to be cheap and the world reserves move toward depletion, we
will be left with an enormous population.. .that the ecology of the earth
will not support. The journey back toward non-oil population homeostasis
will not be pretty. We will discover the hard way that population hyper
growth was simply a side-effect of the oil age. It was a condition, not a
problem with a solution. That is what happened and we are stuck with
it." -James Howard Kunstler

Read and weep, or do something about it:

"As we go from this happy hydrocarbon bubble we have reached now to a
renewable energy resource economy, which we do this century, will the
"civil" part of civilization survive? As we both know there is no way that
alternative energy sources can supply the amount of per capita energy we
enjoy now, much less for the 9 billion expected by 2050. And energy is what
keeps this game going. We are involved in a Faustian bargain?selling our
economic souls for the luxurious life of the moment, but sooner or later the
price has to be paid." -Walter Youngquist

My suggestion: call, write, scream, yell, plead and demand your TV
stations, radio stations, newspapers and every Tom, Dick and Mary to get off
their butts and command what Obama trumpeted, "Change, yes we can!"
www.numbersusa.com. After all, it's your children's future!

Listen to Frosty Wooldridge on Wednesdays as he interviews top
national leaders on his radio show "Connecting the Dots" at
www.themicroeffect. com at 6:00 PM Mountain Time. Adjust tuning in to your
time zone.

Steve Hampton
www.protectourborder.net
www.protectourborder.net/jokes.rtf
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/protectourbordernow

Politics are all about compromise. Let's explain this numerically. On a scale of 1 to 10
with 1 being ultra conservative (pilgrim), and 10 being a fat head (Ted Kennedy). If you
vote for a 5, and they vote for a 10, then you will get a 7.5 average result in Congress.
The only solution is to vote for someone with a lower rating or more conservative than
yourself, and with normal political compromise you will eventually get what you want.
Liberals are choking on their laughter thinking you can't figure this out, but you just
did:)



Here is the speech of Geert Wilders, Chairman, Party for Freedom, the Netherlands, at
the Four Seasons, New York, introducing an Alliance of Patriots and announcing the
Facing Jihad Conference in Jerusalem.

The speech was sponsored by the Hudson Institute on September 25.

Dear friends,
Thank you very much for inviting me.
I come to America with a mission. All is not well in the old world. There is a tremendous
danger looming, and it is very difficult to be optimistic. We might be in the final stages of
the Islamization of Europe. This not only is a clear and present danger to the future of
Europe itself, it is a threat to America and the sheer survival of the West. The United
States as the last bastion of Western civilization, facing an Islamic Europe.

First I will describe the situation on the ground in Europe. Then, I will say a few things
about Islam. To close I will tell you about a meeting in Jerusalem.

The Europe you know is changing. You have probably seen the landmarks. But in all of
these cities, sometimes a few blocks away from your tourist destination, there is another
world. It is the world of the parallel society created by Muslim mass-migration. All
throughout Europe a new reality is rising: entire Muslim neighborhoods where very few
indigenous people reside or are even seen. And if they are, they might regret it. This
goes for the police as well. It's the world of head scarves, where women walk around in
figureless tents, with baby strollers and a group of children. Their husbands, or
slaveholders if you prefer, walk three steps ahead. With mosques on many street
corners. The shops have signs you and I cannot read. You will be hard-pressed to find
any economic activity. These are Muslim ghettos controlled by religious fanatics. These
are Muslim neighborhoods, and they are mushrooming in every city across Europe.
These are the building-blocks for territorial control of increasingly larger portions of
Europe, street by street, neighborhood by neighborhood, city by city. There are now
thousands of mosques throughout Europe With larger congregations than there are in
churches. And in every European city there are plans to build super-mosques that will
dwarf every church in the region. Clearly, the signal is: we rule.

Many European cities are already one-quarter Muslim: just take Amsterdam, Marseille
and Malmo in Sweden. In many cities the majority of the under-18 population is Muslim.
Paris is now surrounded by a ring of Muslim neighborhoods. Mohammed is the most
popular name among boys in many cities. In some elementary schools in Amsterdam
the farm can no longer be mentioned, because that would also mean mentioning the
pig, and that would be an insult to Muslims. Many state schools in Belgium and
Denmark only serve halal food to all pupils. In once-tolerant Amsterdam gays are
beaten up almost exclusively by Muslims. Non-Muslim women routinely hear 'whore,
whore'. Satellite dishes are not pointed to local TV stations, but to stations in the country
of origin. In France school teachers are advised to avoid authors deemed offensive to
Muslims, including Voltaire and Diderot; the same is increasingly true of Darwin. The
history of the Holocaust can no longer be taught because of Muslim sensitivity. In
England sharia courts are now officially part of the British legal system.. Many
neighborhoods in France are no-go areas for women without head scarves. Last week a
man almost died after being beaten up by Muslims in Brussels, because he was
drinking during the Ramadan. Jews are fleeing France in record numbers, on the run for
the worst wave of anti-Semitism since World War II. French is now commonly spoken
on the streets of Tel Aviv and Netanya, Israel. I could go on forever with stories like this.
Stories about Islamization.

A total of fifty-four million Muslims now live in Europe. San Diego University recently
calculated that a staggering 25 percent of the population in Europe will be Muslim just
12 years from now. Bernhard Lewis has predicted a Muslim majority by the end of this
century.

Now these are just numbers. And the numbers would not be threatening if the
Muslim-immigrants had a strong desire to assimilate. But there are few signs of that.
The Pew Research Center reported that half of French Muslims see their loyalty to
Islam as greater than their loyalty to France.One-third of French Muslims do not object
to suicide attacks. The British Centre for Social Cohesion reported that one-third of
British Muslim students are in favor of a worldwide caliphate. Muslims demand what
they call 'respect'. And this is how we give them respect. We have Muslim official state
holidays. The Christian-Democratic attorney general is willing to accept sharia in the
Netherlands if there is a Muslim majority. We have cabinet members with passports
from Morocco and Turkey.

Muslim demands are supported by unlawful behavior, ranging from petty crimes and
random violence, for example against ambulance workers and bus drivers, to
small-scale riots. Paris has seen its uprising in the low-income suburbs, the banlieus. I
call the perpetrators 'settlers'. Because that is what they are. They do not come to
integrate into our societies, they come to integrate our society into their Dar-al-Islam.
Therefore, they are settlers.

Much of this street violence I mentioned is directed exclusively against non-Muslims,
forcing many native people to leave their neighborhoods, their cities, their countries.
Moreover, Muslims are now a swing vote not to be ignored.

The second thing you need to know is the importance of Mohammed the prophet. His
behavior is an example to all Muslims and cannot be criticized. Now, if Mohammed had
been a man of peace, let us say like Ghandi and Mother Theresa wrapped in one, there
would be no problem. But Mohammed was a warlord, a mass murderer, a pedophile,
and had several marriages - at the same time. Islamic tradition tells us how he fought in
battles, how he had his enemies murdered and even had prisoners of war executed.
Mohammed himself slaughtered the Jewish tribe of Banu Qurayza If it is good for Islam,
it is good. If it is bad for Islam, it is bad.

Let no one fool you about Islam being a religion. Sure, it has a god, and a here-after,
and 72 virgins. But in its essence Islam is a political ideology. It is a system that lays
down detailed rules for society and the life of every person. Islam wants to dictate every
aspect of life. Islam means 'submission' . Islam is not compatible with freedom and
democracy, because what it strives for is sharia. If you want to compare Islam to
anything, compare it to communism or national-socialism, these are all totalitarian
ideologies.

Now you know why Winston Churchill called Islam 'the most retrograde force in the
world', and why he compared Mein Kampf to the Quran. The public has wholeheartedly
accepted the Palestinian narrative, and sees Israel as the aggressor. I have lived in this
country and visited it dozens of times. I support Israel. First, because it is the Jewish
homeland after two thousand years of exile up to and including Auschwitz, second
because it is a democracy, and third because Israel is our first line of defense.

This tiny country is situated on the fault line of jihad, frustrating Islam's territorial
advance. Israel is facing the front lines of jihad, like Kashmir, Kosovo, the Philippines,
Southern Thailand, Darfur in Sudan, Lebanon, and Aceh in Indonesia. Israel is simply in
the way. The same way West-Berlin was during the Cold War.

The war against Israel is not a war against Israel. It is a war against the West. It is jihad.
Israel is simply receiving the blows that are meant for all of us. If there would have been
no Israel, Islamic imperialism would have found other venues to release its energy and
its desire for conquest. Thanks to Israeli parents who send their children to the army
and lay awake at night, parents in Europe and America can sleep well and dream,
unaware of the dangers looming.

Many in Europe argue in favor of abandoning Israel in order to address the grievances
of our Muslim minorities. But if Israel were, God forbid, to go down, it would not bring
any solace to the West. It would not mean our Muslim minorities would all of a sudden
change their behavior, and accept our values. On the contrary, the end of Israel would
give enormous encouragement to the forces of Islam. They would, and rightly so, see
the demise of Israel as proof that the West is weak, and doomed. The end of Israel
would not mean the end of our problems with Islam, but only the beginning. It would
mean the start of the final battle for world domination. If they can get Israel, they can get
everything. So-called journalists volunteer to label any and all critics of Islamization as a
'right-wing extremists' or 'racists'. In my country, the

Netherlands, 60 percent of the population now sees the mass immigration of Muslims
as the number one policy mistake since World War II. And another 60 percent sees
Islam as the biggest threat. Yet there is a danger greater danger than terrorist attacks,
the scenario of America as the last man standing. The lights may go out in Europe
faster than you can imagine. An Islamic Europe means a Europe without freedom and
democracy, an economic wasteland, an intellectual nightmare, and a loss of military
might for America - as its allies will turn into enemies, enemies with atomic bombs. With
an Islamic Europe, it would be up to America alone to preserve the heritage of Rome,
Athens and Jerusalem.

Dear friends, liberty is the most precious of gifts. My generation never had to fight for
this freedom, it was offered to us on a silver platter, by people who fought for it with their
lives. All throughout Europe American cemeteries remind us of the young boys who
never made it home, and whose memory we cherish. My generation does not own this
freedom; we are merely its custodians. We can only hand over this hard won liberty to
Europe's children in the same state in which it was offered to us. We cannot strike a
deal with mullahs and imams. Future generations would never forgive us. We cannot
squander our liberties. We simply do not have the right to do so.


Steve Hampton
www.protectourborder.net
www.protectourborder.net/jokes.rtf
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/protectourbordernow

Politics are all about compromise. Let's explain this numerically. On a scale of 1 to 10
with 1 being ultra conservative (pilgrim), and 10 being a fat head (Ted Kennedy). If you
vote for a 5, and they vote for a 10, then you will get a 7.5 average result in Congress.
The only solution is to vote for someone with a lower rating or more conservative than
yourself, and with normal political compromise you will eventually get what you want.
Liberals are choking on their laughter thinking you can't figure this out, but you just
did:)


IS THIS PRESIDENT NUTS OR WHAT: NATIONAL SUICIDE IMMINENT

By Frosty Wooldridge
February 19, 2009
NewsWithViews. com

Last year, George Bush by executive order started the importation of
1,000 Sunni and Shia Muslims into the USA every month. Consequently, we
imported 12,000 Iraqi refugees. Those same refugees have fought and killed
one another in Iraq for the last 1,000 years. That same executive order
jumped those import numbers to 19,000 refugees in 2009.

In the past week, President Barack Obama signed another $20.3 million
bill to import Palestinians from war-torn Palestine. It might be appreciated
that Muslims loathe Jews as a cultural paradigm.

What can go wrong when we allow hundreds of thousands of people who
have been, as Mark Steyn said, "marinated" in a "sick death cult," who voted
for Hamas, and 55 percent of whom support suicide bombings live here and at
the American taxpayers' expense."

Obama signed the "presidential determination" which allows hundreds of
thousands of Palestinians with ties to Hamas to resettle in the United
States on January 27, 2009 and appeared in the Federal Register on February
4, 2009.

Capitol Hill gave zero attention to an order that provides a free
ticket supplements with housing and food allowances to individuals who have
displayed their overwhelming support of the Islamic Resistance Movement
(Hamas) in the parliamentary election of January 2006.

Already, we import 100,000 legal immigrants every 30 days. We tolerate
100,000 illegal criminal aliens every 30 days into America whereby we pay
$346 billion annually (Source; Edwin Rubenstein, National Research Center
thesocialcontract. com) for their transport, housing, food, spending money,
transportation, medical and educational costs.

But to import violently angry Shia and Sunni refugees along with Hamas
suicide bombers from Gaza illustrates how totally bizarre and out of touch
Obama proves in his actions-along with a somnolent Congress.

We will not survive the coming ethnic conflict in our country. We will
fall and crack into more pieces than Humpty Dumpty. The coming race riots
will make Rodney King and Watts look like first grade garden parties.

Please refer once again to a prophetic speech by Colorado Governor
Lamm, "How to Destroy America":

"We could make the United States another 'Hispanic Quebec' without
much effort. The key is to celebrate diversity rather than unity. As
Benjamin Schwarz said in the Atlantic Monthly: "The apparent success of our
own multi-ethnic and multi-cultural experiment might have been achieved not
by tolerance but by hegemony. Without the dominance that once dictated
ethnocentrically and what it meant to be an American, we are left with only
tolerance and pluralism to hold us together."

Two weeks before the Federation of American Immigration Reform
Conference, Muslim students at San Francisco State University charged a
student-run Republican voting table. They knocked it over and threatened to
blow up the place. One Muslim woman vowed to become a bomber martyr. They
did not respect our Republican form of government where each of us is
afforded our rights to free speech. Ironically, these are American Muslim
student citizens. Apparently, they didn't realize that they live in America.

Fox News journalist Joshua Rhett Miller reported last week, "Muzzammil
Hassan, right, founder of Bridges TV, was charged with murder in the
beheading of his wife, Aasiya Hassan, left, in Orchard Park, N.Y.
"The estranged wife of a Muslim television executive feared for her
life after filing for divorce last month from her abusive husband, her
attorney said" and was found beheaded Thursday in his upstate New York
television studio.

"Aasiya Z. Hassan, 37, was found dead on Thursday at the offices of
Bridges TV in Orchard Park, N.Y., near Buffalo. Her husband, Muzzammil
Hassan, 44, has reportedly been charged with second-degree murder."

"She was very much aware of the potential ramification of her filing
for divorce might have," said attorney Elizabeth DiPirro, whose law firm,
Hogan Willig, represented Aasiya Hassan in the divorce proceeding. "But she
wanted to proceed despite the potential for it to erupt."

"DiPirro said the couple had "physical confrontations off and on" for
their entire eight-year marriage that had recently escalated to death
threats. The grounds for divorce were "cruel and inhuman treatment," DiPirro
said, referring to multiple prior incidents of abuse. She declined to
elaborate.

"We were worried about the situation becoming volatile," DiPirro said.

It might be noted that Mr. Hassan attempted to show the softer,
gentler side of Islam to U.S. audiences. However, it appears his passion got
the best of him. Under Sharia Law, he would not be charged. Hassan
represents dozens of "Honor Killings" in the USA in the last few years as
Islamic immigrants gain greater numbers.

Lamm continued, "I would encourage all immigrants to keep their own
language and culture. I would replace the melting pot metaphor with the
salad bowl metaphor. It is important to ensure that we have various cultural
sub-groups living in America reinforcing their differences rather than as
Americans, emphasizing their similarities. "

"Fourth, I would make our fastest growing demographic group the least
educated. I would add a second underclass, unassimilated, undereducated and
antagonistic to our population. I would have this second underclass have a
50 percent dropout rate from high school."

"My sixth plan for America's downfall would include dual citizenship
and promote divided loyalties. I would celebrate diversity over unity. I
would stress differences rather than similarities. Diverse people worldwide
are mostly engaged in hating each other-that is, when they are not killing
each other. A diverse, peaceful or stable society is against most historical
precedent. People undervalue the unity it takes to keep a nation together.
Look at the ancient Greeks: "The Greeks believed that they belonged to the
same race; they possessed a common language and literature; and they
worshipped the same gods. All Greece took part in the Olympic Games."

Lamm continued, "Next to last, I would place all subjects off
limits-make it taboo to talk about anything against the cult of 'diversity'.
I would find a word similar to 'heretic' in the 16th century-that stopped
discussion and paralyzed thinking. Words like 'racist' or 'xenophobe' halt
discussion and debate."

With this latest executive order, America stands in the cross hairs of
its own beheading brought on by its own presidents and blatantly thick
Congress.

Listen to Frosty Wooldridge on Wednesdays as he interviews top
national leaders on his radio show "Connecting the Dots" at
www.themicroeffect. com at 6:00 PM Mountain Time. Adjust tuning in to your
time zone.

------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -

Frosty Wooldridge possesses a unique view of the world, cultures and
families in that he has bicycled around the globe 100,000 miles, on six
continents and six times across the United States in the past 30 years. His
published books include: "HANDBOOK FOR TOURING BICYCLISTS" ; "STRIKE
THREE!
TAKE YOUR BASE"; "IMMIGRATION' S UNARMED INVASION: DEADLY
CONSEQUENCES" ;
"MOTORCYCLE ADVENTURE TO ALASKA: INTO THE WIND-A TEEN NOVEL";
"BICYCLING
AROUND THE WORLD: TIRE TRACKS FOR YOUR IMAGINATION" ; "AN EXTREME
ENCOUNTER:
ANTARCTIA." His next book: "TILTING THE STATUE OF LIBERTY INTO A SWAMP."
He
lives in Denver, Colorado.

His latest book. 'IMMIGRATION' S UNARMED INVASION-DEADLY CONSEQUENCES.
'

Website: www.FrostyWooldridg e.com


Steve Hampton
www.protectourborder.net
www.protectourborder.net/jokes.rtf
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/protectourbordernow
Politics are all about compromise. Let's explain this numerically. On a scale of 1 to 10
with 1 being ultra conservative (pilgrim), and 10 being a fat head (Ted Kennedy). If you
vote for a 5, and they vote for a 10, then you will get a 7.5 average result in Congress.
The only solution is to vote for someone with a lower rating or more conservative than
yourself, and with normal political compromise you will eventually get what you want.
Liberals are choking on their laughter thinking you can't figure this out, but you just
did:)

DIVIDED: AMERICA FALLS

By Frosty Wooldridge
February 13, 2009
NewsWithViews. com

One look across the American landscape finds our country in trouble.
Every crisis facing us in 2009 found its origins within our United States
Congress and presidents that led us into wars.

Those men and women, with their hands on the power levers, jacked this
country into horrendous debt, endless war and denigration of our culture,
language and national cohesiveness.

They bulldozed us into Vietnam, orchestrated Desert Storm and
manipulated the Iraq War by deceit, deception and treachery.

Led by Senator Teddy Kennedy, they added 100 million people to our
country in the last 40 years with prospects for adding another 100 million
in the next 30 years. Human and environmental consequences accelerate by the
day!

When historians tabulate the final toll?our politicians perpetrating
the war in Iraq can be analogous to poking your hand into a pot of boiling
soup. While you keep it in the soup, it scalds your hand, and, when you
finally withdraw it, nothing has changed as the soup continues boiling, but
your hand ultimately falls off from destructive damage to its ability to
function.

Pretending or hoping that we brought 'democracy' to an ancient
civilization in Iraq by our armed forces will prove as arrogant as Achilles
with an arrow in his heel and finally his ultimate death.

While we find ourselves boiling in debt, our Congress injects our
nation with an untenable future. My friend Doug Dorsey of Colorado offered
his perspective on what the United States of America faces in the 21st
century:

"Aesop, the Greek slave and fable author coined the phrase, "United we
stand, Divided we fall," Dorsey said. "The Three Musketeers had it right
when they said, "All for One, and One for All". The inverted wording of this
phrase is also the national motto of Switzerland, and written in the cupola
of the Federal Palace of Switzerland. These wonderful phrases were all used
in one way or another to foster unity in the face of crisis, whether it was
to unite a country under one King, bring a country together after years of
civil war, or instill hope after disastrous storms. Military and political
leaders throughout history have inspired their countrymen to achieve
greatness and overcome monumental disasters. One of the most stirring was
from President John F. Kennedy in his inauguration speech, "Ask not what
your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country".

"So here we are today, a country divided ideologically, politically,
spiritually and in some cases, militarily. We have fallen into the quicksand
of division to the point that we have lost our focus on who we are, what we
stand for and where we are going in the future. Our core values and vision
have been fogged over by greed, false promises and blind belief in pied
pipers who have turned out to not be the leaders we hoped for, but those who
had no interests save for their own gratification and wealth. Does any of
this sound familiar? We have been here before.

"Our present economic crisis has been the result of many mistakes, not
the least of which is blind trust in the belief that persons in leadership
positions always had our best interests at heart, lending agencies and
federal officials were persons of unquestioned honor, and that our personal
and national safety was never in peril. We dispatched our representatives to
the white castle in Washington, D.C. with the cloak of trustworthiness and
the jaded belief that we could sit back and enjoy life, uninhibited by worry
for our futures. It has not turned out that way at all.

"In the face of major deficits in the upcoming Colorado State budget,
and a higher education system, increasingly unaffordable for many in-state
United State Citizens, we have Chris (Son of Roy) Romer introducing Senate
Bill 09-170 that would extend in-state college tuition to illegal
immigrants. Illegal Immigration has already had in some cases a crippling
affect on our economy. Governor Ritter has indicated to the powers that be
in Washington, D.C. that Colorado would entertain taking on Guantanamo
terrorist detainees, without even a hint of possible input from the citizens
of the State. Jobless rates are increasing on a daily basis and will
continue to do so for some time yet.
"Three, and maybe more of President Obama's nominations for cabinet
positions have been caught in the press limelight for failure to pay taxes
over extended periods of time. The proposed stimulus package has enough pork
in it to choke any intrinsic value for its proposed success. The student
loan scam has corrupted many bankers and politicians, and China, along with
Japan, has a strangle hold on the financial future of the United States,
along with plans to bankrupt our seaports, and our longshoremen by sending
all of their goods from America. Manufacturers are revamping ports in Mexico
and up through the proposed Canamex highways to be sold for pennies on the
dollar back to us and make the U.S.A. more indebted to a communist nation. I
got a headache thinking about this and an even bigger one writing about it.

""Where does it stop?" This is just a small look into the maze of
issues facing us today. Looked at as singular issues, they don't seem to be
that bad. Viewed together they form a very grim picture of the future of
this country. The result of these and many other serious cracks in our
resolve for a better America, is to further divide this country and its
citizens to the point of making a North American Union more palatable and
appealing to its citizens. Possibly our only survival, if that possibility
still exists.

"Our trusted and misguided leaders have set the stage for the collapse
of the United States as a sovereign nation right under our noses, and in
many cases without congressional review, citizen awareness or input. Several
meetings, some secret and behind closed doors between President Bush,
President Vicente Fox, now President Calderon, and Canadian officials and
assorted committees have taken place about open borders and a North American
Union. Billions of dollars have been at least verbally committed to projects
that millions of citizens of all three countries have very little knowledge
of. Some projects have already been started. TOGETHER We Stand, Divided We
Fall."

How will Obama undermine the American way of life with his push for
open borders, unlimited immigration and loss of our culture? With the next
added 100 million Americans, expect over 100 languages to displace English
as our national language. Expect incompatible cultures to create Balkanized
sections separating from the American way of life. Expect accelerating
environmental problems from sheer 'overshoot' and overload via
hyper-population growth.

Read: Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed by Jared
Diamond

Listen to Frosty Wooldridge on Tuesdays and Thursdays as he interviews
top national leaders on his radio show "Connecting the Dots" at
republicbroadcasting.org at 6:00 PM Mountain Time. Adjust tuning in to your
time zone.

Steve Hampton
www.protectourborder.net
www.protectourborder.net/jokes.rtf
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/protectourbordernow

Politics are all about compromise. Let's explain this numerically. On a scale of 1 to 10
with 1 being ultra conservative (pilgrim), and 10 being a fat head (Ted Kennedy). If you
vote for a 5, and they vote for a 10, then you will get a 7.5 average result in Congress.
The only solution is to vote for someone with a lower rating or more conservative than
yourself, and with normal political compromise you will eventually get what you want.
Liberals are choking on their laughter thinking you can't figure this out, but you just
did:)


BAILOUTS: A COMPLETE FRAUD AGAINST THE AMERICAN WORKER

By Frosty Wooldridge
February 2, 2009
NewsWithViews. com

A recent Associated Press news release exposed U.S. banks accepting
billions in bailout money along with major corporations. Banks defraud
American taxpayers by hiring thousands of foreign works in place of our
citizens.

The report said, "The figures are significant because they show that
the bailed-out banks, being kept afloat with U.S. taxpayer money, actively
sought to hire foreign workers instead of American workers. As the economic
collapse worsened last year with huge numbers of bank employees laid off-the
numbers of visas sought by the dozen banks in AP's analysis increased by
nearly one-third, from 3,258 in fiscal 2007 to 4,163 in fiscal 2008. The AP
reviewed visa applications the banks filed with the Labor Department under
the H-1B visa program, which allows temporary employment of foreign workers
in specialized- skill and advanced-degree positions."

With full complicity of our U.S. Congress and former President Bush,
"The dozen banks receiving the biggest rescue packages, totaling more than
$150 billion, requested visas for more than 21,800 foreign workers over the
past six years for positions that included senior vice presidents, corporate
lawyers, junior investment analysts and human resources specialists. The
average annual salary for those jobs was $90,721.00, nearly twice the median
income for all American households."

Thomas Jefferson said, "I believe that banking institutions are more
dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever
allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by
inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up
around the banks will deprive the people of all property until their
children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered."

In the past decade, IT workers suffered displacements from their jobs
because billionaire Bill Gates wielded obscene amounts of financial power to
push H-1B visa entries to over 1.0 million foreign workers. That's how many
U.S. IT workers watched their jobs vanish in the past 10 years.
Additionally, those foreign IT workers send their money home to their
countries. Instead of our money circulating throughout the U.S. financial
system, it bleeds out of our country.

Overall, cash transfers exceed $80 billion annually to foreign
countries. To give you an idea of how much money we lose, Mexico's reception
of U.S. dollars runs $24 billion every year for over 10 years. Other than
oil income, Mexico's second biggest income flows from the cash transfer
pipeline.

The Bear-Stearns Report showed that the Mexican and immigrant impact
in America makes those workers the second largest underground economy in the
world. They bleed the U.S. treasury, and presently, we suffer a $10.3
trillion deficit.

"It is unclear how many foreign workers the banks actually hired; the
government does not release those details," the AP reported. "The actual
number is likely a fraction of the 21,800 foreign workers the banks sought
to hire because the government limits the number of visas it grants to
85,000 each year among all U.S. employers. During the last three months of
2008, the largest banks that received taxpayer loans announced more than
100,000 layoffs. The number of foreign workers included among those laid off
is unknown. Foreigners are attractive hires because companies have found
ways to pay them less than American workers."

By digging further, financial institutions like Fannie Mae and Freddie
Mac received $85 billion in bailout money, but gave away billions in
fraudulent loans to illegal aliens and poor people unable to bring a dime to
the home-ownership signing table.

In other words, we endure gross if not obscene corruption at the
highest levels in Congress! Yet, we re-elected those scoundrels such as
Senator Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi for starters!
When you look at the thousands of employers who hire illegal criminal
aliens, you see a pattern of corruption that defies imagination. Not only do
the employers undercut and displace American workers, they fail to pay taxes
on an estimated 50 percent of the money because they pay under the table.

Every illegal alien employer undermines the U.S. Constitution which
provides him/her with a free society, a magnificent life as well as freedom
from terror. But when they commit their corruption, they undermine the
standard of living and quality of life for our citizens. Every CEO, company
president or construction company that hires illegal aliens in place of
Americans-or, average citizens that hire illegal criminal aliens-you fuel
massive corruption.

For guys like Bill Gates, you cheat your fellow Americans. For the
head of McDonald's, Wendy's and other fast food giants, your hiring illegal
aliens steals jobs from our working poor. You CEO's at Tyson, Hormel, Swift,
and Amour make me sick with your corruption. You head-honchos at Target,
Wal-Mart, Lowe's and Home Depot create 15 million unemployed American
workers by selling $700 billion a year in products made from India, China,
Mexico-seldom do we see anything "Made in America" today.

And you, U.S. House reps and Senators, you make me sick most of all
because you instigate such monumental fraud against U.S. workers.

As a final note, let it be known that corruption becomes a 'mechanism'
or paradigm that operates in third world countries stemming from a
well-entrenched power elite. Once in power, they crush the middle and lower
classes into perpetual poverty.

While we immigrate 2.4 million third world migrants into our country
annually to take our citizens' jobs and we create more unemployed by
allowing 20 to 30 million illegal criminal aliens-our middle class falters
into a new poverty.

Today, we face devolution of America's middle class at the hands of
our own leaders, corporations and new ruling elite.

"You cannot legislate the poor into freedom by legislating the wealthy
out of freedom. What one person receives without working for, another person
must work for without receiving. The government cannot give to anybody
anything that the government does not first take from somebody else. When
half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the
other half is going to take care of them, and when the other half gets the
idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what
they work for, that my dear friend, is about the end of any nation. You
cannot multiply wealth by dividing it." Dr. Adrian Rogers, 1931 - 2005

Listen to Frosty Wooldridge on Tuesdays and Thursdays as he interviews
top national leaders on his radio show "Connecting the Dots" at
republicbroadcastin g.org at 6:00 PM Mountain Time. Adjust tuning in to your
time zone.

Steve Hampton
www.protectourborder.net
www.protectourborder.net/jokes.rtf
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/protectourbordernow

Politics are all about compromise. Let's explain this numerically. On a scale of 1 to 10
with 1 being ultra conservative (pilgrim), and 10 being a fat head (Ted Kennedy). If you
vote for a 5, and they vote for a 10, then you will get a 7.5 average result in Congress.
The only solution is to vote for someone with a lower rating or more conservative than
yourself, and with normal political compromise you will eventually get what you want.
Liberals are choking on their laughter thinking you can't figure this out, but you just
did:)


Subject: OBAMA REGIME ALREADY GOING FOR PRIVATELY OWNED FIREARMS!

It's Started!

Here they come, ready or not. Feel the water getting warmer?

Are you ready for the House Bill titled 'HR 45, Blair Holt Licensing and Record Act of
2009'?

It will make it illegal to own a firearm unless it is registered with the database in
Washington D.C. As a gun owner you will have to be finger printed, you will be required
to provide your DL#, SS#, you must maintain a valid address at all times, submit to
mental and physical health records being put on file, you will also be required to file any
address changes and any ownership changes even if a private sale. Each update will
cost $25 and if you fail to comply you will lose your right to own firearms. This bill and its
language mirror almost completely one defeated last year in the House of
Representatives by soon to be Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel. Will we the citizenry be as
lucky this time?

Pass this on to everyone who believes in strict Constitutionalism and remember that
laws only apply to those who obey them. Criminals by definition and nature do not abide
by laws. New laws and restrictions only apply to the law abiding citizen and are not
written with the criminal in mind. With guns, it is not about having laws on the books to
prosecute individuals, it is about taking guns away from the people so that no one has
them in the first place. One last item to note, when assuming power and creating a
fascist state, Hitler was a proponent of strong gun laws because a disarmed populace
was much easier to control than an armed one. The kings of old also outlawed weapons
of any kind in any region that they conquered to quell the ability of the citizens to up rise
against them.

The Founding Fathers of this nation understood all of the above and because of this
they included the second amendment in the constitution. In fact, they knew that at some
point in every society's life span that the need for the population to arise came about. To
this end they made the right to keep and bear arms against a tyrannical state an
absolute right that could not be revoked. They did this because the first thing tyrants
and despots do is to remove a population's right to defend themselves When this is
done, the tyrants have no problem with the destruction of society as we know it.

Send this on to all true patriots! Protect your Second Amendment!

The following is a summary of the bill as provided by the Congressional Research
Service. If you read the whole bill, you'll find it will effectively preclude the ownership of
ANY firearms by law-abiding people unless licensed by the Attorney General. How long
do you think THAT would take??

Congressional Research Service Summary
The following summary was written by the Congressional Research Service, a
well-respected nonpartisan arm of the Library of Congress. GovTrack did not write and
has no control over these summaries.

1/6/2009--Introduce d.

Blair Holt's Firearm Licensing and Record of Sale Act of 2009

Amends the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act to prohibit a person from
possessing a firearm unless that person has been issued a firearm license under this
Act or a state system certified under this Act and such license has not been invalidated
or revoked. Prescribes license application, issuance, and renewal requirements.
Prohibits transferring or receiving a qualifying firearm unless the recipient presents a
valid firearms license, the license is verified, and the dealer records a tracking
authorization number. Prescribes firearms transfer reporting and record keeping
requirements. Directs the Attorney General to establish and maintain a federal record of
sale system.

Prohibits: (1) transferring a firearm to any person other than a licensee, unless the
transfer is processed through a licensed dealer in accordance with national instant
criminal background check system requirements, with exceptions;

(2) a licensed manufacturer or dealer from failing to comply with reporting and record
keeping requirements of this Act;
(3) failing to report the loss or theft of the firearm to the Attorney General within 72
hours;

(4) failing to report to the Attorney General an address change within 60 days; or

(5) keeping a loaded firearm, or an unloaded firearm and ammunition for the firearm,
knowingly or recklessly disregarding the risk that a child is capable of gaining access, if
a child uses the firearm and causes death or serious bodily injury. Prescribes criminal
penalties for violations of firearms provisions covered by this Act.

Directs the Attorney General to: (1) establish and maintain a firearm injury information
clearinghouse; (2) conduct continuing studies and investigations of firearm-related
deaths and injuries; and (3) collect and maintain current production and sales figures of
each licensed manufacturer. Authorizes the Attorney General to certify state firearm
licensing or record of sale systems.

Pleased be advised and pass this along: House Bill HR 45, Blair Holt Licensing and
Record Act of 2009 will, in my opinion, be the first of 2 or 3 steps toward confiscation of
privately owned firearms.

You can follow the sequence as it already happened in Canada and the UK. First the
government needs to register the guns so they will know where to find them.

Steve Hampton
www.protectourborder.net
www.protectourborder.net/jokes.rtf
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/protectourbordernow

Politics are all about compromise. Let's explain this numerically. On a scale of 1 to 10
with 1 being ultra conservative (pilgrim), and 10 being a fat head (Ted Kennedy). If you
vote for a 5, and they vote for a 10, then you will get a 7.5 average result in Congress.
The only solution is to vote for someone with a lower rating or more conservative than
yourself, and with normal political compromise you will eventually get what you want.
Liberals are choking on their laughter thinking you can't figure this out, but you just
did:)


Dear Yuba County American Independent Party members:

What do you think about a leader who urges you to dump your 'principles' and instead
worship the dollar instead? A leader who urges you to bow down to Barry Soetoro who
is 'standing on the mount' and tempting you and your neighbors with imagined
prosperity soon (but your children and their children's children will be damned for
decades to come.)
Soetoro, (who I call "The great Satan") is indeed offering all of us the apple. A couple of
GOP Governors claim they will not take a bite, but I do not believe they can close their
eyes for long to the enticement that Soetoro is offering. He and his master (George
Soros) knows many of us are caught between the rock and a hard place. We have
refinanced our houses too many times (sucking our equity dry), we have over-borrowed
up to our credit card limit. We have not saved a dime for a rainy-day and lastly, our
coinage is worthless and is merely unworthy fiat money.

Our financial crisis has not come upon us overnight, but it is only now that we are
reaping the fruits of decades of slothful financial habits, and not paying attention to what
was happening around us. Our personal finances, our state finances, and our Federal
finances are in the toilet and we have no one to blame except ourselves. We have been
asleep and have failed to stand our watch at the gate.

It amuses me to hear someone like Schwarzenegger say the dollar (economy) is more
important than principles. I do not believe that most of what we do politically has ANY
PRINCIPLES anymore. A principle is a BASIC TRUTH. Since we have become
enslaved to the Federal Reserve (a corrupt central bank) we have had no principles
since 1913. Since the Federal Reserve is a basic LIE how can basic truths spring from
it? It can't!

Schwarzenegger is a fine one to talk about principles. Of course he is more concerned
with the almighty dollar than principles! His entire life has shown that! And of course, I
am also saying that Soetoro has no principles either...nor does any of his appointees.

So, with glee I say...I TOLD YOU SO. I ran against Arnold in 2006 election for Governor
and Mr. 'Dollars over Principles' won the election. All I can say it that you got what you
voted for.

Aren't you glad you won?


Edward C. Noonan
Chairman - Yuba County American Independent Party
National Committee Member: America's Independent Party
Founder - CA Mormon Battalion
Former 2006-2008 State Party Chairman - American Independent Party
Former 2006 Candidate/Governor - State of California
Former 2002 Candidate/Secretary of State - State of California

Steve Hampton
www.protectourborder.net
www.protectourborder.net/jokes.rtf
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/protectourbordernow
Politics are all about compromise. Let's explain this numerically. On a scale of 1 to 10
with 1 being ultra conservative (pilgrim), and 10 being a fat head (Ted Kennedy). If you
vote for a 5, and they vote for a 10, then you will get a 7.5 average result in Congress.
The only solution is to vote for someone with a lower rating or more conservative than
yourself, and with normal political compromise you will eventually get what you want.
Liberals are choking on their laughter thinking you can't figure this out, but you just
did:)


Christians Use Prophecy To Excuse Laziness
By Chuck Baldwin
February 3, 2009

This column is archived at
http://www.chuckbaldwinlive.com/c2009/cbarchive_20090203.html


In response to my two previous columns regarding the current development of
a devilish New World Order, many professing Christians wrote me with
comments to the effect that we should not be concerned about whatever global
tyranny may be developing, because "it's all a part of God's plan," or
"Jesus is coming soon," and similar statements. I, too, believe in the
imminent return of Jesus Christ to earth. But, then again, so did Christians
from every generation over the last two millennia. In fact, the Apostle Paul
was looking for the return of Christ while he lived (Philippians 3:20). But
does anticipation of Christ's Second Coming excuse personal neglect,
indifference, and downright laziness? Of course not.

Had pastors and Christians of colonial America believed and acted as most
Christians believe and act today, this country would still be a Crown colony
and we would never have known the freedoms and liberties that our forebears
bequeathed to us. Christians of that era, however, believed that it was
their duty and obligation to fight for right and do everything within their
power to resist tyranny. They also believed that God would honor and bless
their efforts, which He certainly did!

It is extremely difficult for me to reconcile the apathy and slave-like
mentality that seems to permeate modern Christendom (in America) with both
our own heritage and the very Word of God. For example, the Apostle Paul is
very clear when he writes that a Christian must never "do evil, that good
may come" (Romans 3:8). Yet, that is exactly what many, if not most,
Christians are doing today.

When confronted with an obvious evil (a burgeoning tyrannical New World
Order, not to mention a number of lesser evils), modern Christians will
shrug and glibly say, "It's God's will; we must not oppose it," or words to
that effect. This attitude says, "I will tolerate or even condone evil in
order to hasten Christ's return."

In the first place, no one knows when Christ will return, no matter how many
books or tapes they have produced to say they do. In Acts chapter 1, Jesus
was asked by His disciples if He would, at that time, set up His kingdom.
The first words out of His mouth were, "It is not for you to know." Oh, we
can speculate, surmise, and make educated guesses, but that's the best we
can do. It's time we were honest enough to admit it: only God knows when
Christ will return. In fact, Jesus said, "But of that day and hour knoweth
no man, no, not the angels of heaven, but my Father only" (Matthew 24:36).

In the meantime, millions of Christians across America are trying to play
God. They talk as if they know when Christ will come. It's actually worse
than that. They have the attitude that they have no personal responsibility
to defend freedom and resist despotism. They seem to look at God as some
kind of glorified fireman, who is obligated to rush in at the last minute to
rescue them from a burning fire--a fire that they helped ignite, or at
least, refused to put out themselves when they had the opportunity to do so.
It's the old, "God would not let that happen in America" syndrome.

How arrogant can we be? Ask believers from despotic regimes around the world
what they think about God letting tribulation come, and they will quickly
tell you, "We are already in tribulation. " Are Christians in the United
States really that arrogant as to believe that God loves them more than He
loves believers in other countries? If not, can we not see that if believers
around the world have suffered (and still suffer) the heavy hand of tyranny
and oppression, it is certainly possible for tyranny and oppression to come
to our land? The fact is, the only reason that Christians in America have
not (for the most part) suffered tyranny and oppression is because of the
hard work and sacrifice of our forefathers. We are simply enjoying the fruit
of their labor.

In the second place, how do we know what God would do, if we only had the
backbone to do our duty? How do we know that God would not give America "a
new birth of freedom" for our children and grandchildren, if we only had the
courage and fortitude to oppose the evil being thrust upon us by these
would-be tyrants? America is only the "land of the free," because it was the
"home of the brave." Take away the latter and we lose the former. And that
is exactly what is currently happening.

In the third place, Christians have a moral imperative to resist evil, even
if their efforts are fruitless. We are not responsible for outcome, only
effort. Believers throughout history acted on principle, leaving the results
with God. (Read Hebrews chapter 11.) Some were delivered; some were not.
That did not matter. What mattered was doing one's duty. We Christians are
to give our bodies as "a living sacrifice" (Romans 12:1). It is God's
prerogative to use our sacrifice as He sees fit. Therefore, there is no such
thing as a "losing effort," when it comes to doing right. Doing right
(resisting evil) is its own reward. The three Hebrew children were not
commended because God delivered them from the burning fiery furnace; they
were commended because they were willing to go into the burning fiery
furnace. So must we be.

I believe the real reason why so many professing Christians are so apathetic
and indifferent to what is happening has nothing to do with the teachings of
Scripture, Bible doctrine, eschatology, or anything of the like. It has
everything to do with old-fashioned laziness. Today's average Christian just
flat does not want to be bothered. He has a comfortable house, an easy
chair, television, and a set of golf clubs in the closet. He takes two or
three weeks' vacation every year, goes to church on Sunday (a church that
does not intrude on his comfort zone, of course), pays taxes, and votes for
his favorite "pro-life" Republican candidate every two years, and assumes
that he is a "good" Christian and "patriotic" American. He is neither!

A real Christian patriot would never allow his country to be taken over by a
gaggle of elitist goons bent on stealing his liberties--includin g his
religious liberties--without doing everything in his power to prevent it. A
real Christian patriot is active, alert, engaged, zealous, and committed to
preserving liberty.

What if Jesus doesn't come for another 100 years? Another 200 years? What
are we going to say to our grandchildren when they ask us what we were doing
when our freedoms and liberties were being stolen? What will we say to our
Christian forebears when we meet them in eternity? They sacrificed
everything so that we could live in peace and freedom. What will we say to
them? What will we say to God, who handed this land of liberty to us on a
silver (albeit blood-soaked) platter?

Tell me again that "there is nothing we can do about it," or "it's God's
will," or "Jesus is coming soon." Better yet, tell it again to the suffering
Christians around the world; tell it again to our Christian forebears; tell
it again to your children and grandchildren who are going to inherit a land
of tyranny and oppression, all because you were too lazy to resist.

I know unbelievers who have more character and determination about
preserving liberty than many who call themselves Christians. And I have a
ton more respect for them, too. Our Lord told us, "For unto whomsoever much
is given, of him shall be much required" (Luke 12:48). Yes, Christians in
America have been given the best of both worlds, and many do not even
appreciate it enough to see to it that their own children--their own flesh
and blood--will live to enjoy the same blessings. They are pathetic!
So, the next time you hear some piety-draped Christian talking about how he
won't engage the enemy and fight for liberty, because of prophecy, or some
other spiritually- sounding platitude, just remember, it has nothing to do
with prophecy, or anything of the sort: it has everything to do with
old-fashioned laziness. My feeling toward him is the same as that of Sam
Adams (a fellow Christian) toward the Tories of old: "If ye love wealth
better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animating contest
for freedom--go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms.
Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly
upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen!" Amen!


++++++++++++ +++++++++ +++++++++ +++++++++ +++++++++ +++++++++
+++++++
*If you appreciate this column and want to help me distribute these editorial opinions to
an ever-growing audience, donations may now be made by credit card, check, or
Money Order. Use this link:
http://www.chuckbaldwinlive.com/donate.php

(c) Chuck Baldwin

NOTE TO THE READER:

This email editorial cannot be considered Spam as long as the sender includes contact
information and a method of removal.

To subscribe, click on this link and follow the instructions:
http://www.chuckbaldwinlive.com/subscribe.php

Chuck Baldwin's commentaries are copyrighted and may be republished,
reposted, or emailed providing the person or organization doing so does not
charge for subscriptions or advertising and that the column is copied intact
and that full credit is given and that Chuck's web site address is included.

Editors or Publishers of publications charging for subscriptions or
advertising who want to run these columns must contact Chuck Baldwin for
permission. Radio or television Talk Show Hosts interested in scheduling an
interview with Chuck should contact chuck@chuckbaldwinlive.com

Steve Hampton
www.protectourborder.net
http://protectourborder.net/jokes.rtf
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/protectourbordernow
Politics are all about compromise. Let's explain this numerically. On a scale of 1 to 10
with 1 being ultra conservative (pilgrim), and 10 being a fat head (Ted Kennedy). If you
vote for a 5, and they vote for a 10, then you will get a 7.5 average result in Congress.
The only solution is to vote for someone with a lower rating or more conservative than
yourself, and with normal political compromise you will eventually get what you want.
Liberals are choking on their laughter thinking you can't figure this out, but you just
did:)



This will make you re-think: A Trivia question in Sunday School:

How long is the beast allowed to have authority in Revelations?

Revelations Chapter 13 tells us it is 42 months, and you know what that is.

Almost a four-year term of a Presidency.

All I can say is "Lord, Have mercy on us!"

According to The Book of Revelations the anti-Christ is:

The anti-Christ will Be a man, in his 40's, of MUSLIM descent, who will
deceive the nations with Persuasive language, and have a MASSIVE
Christ-like appeal....the prophecy says
That people will flock to him and he will promise false hope and world
peace, And when he is in power, will destroy everything.. Do we recognize
this description??

I STRONGLY URGE each one of you to post this as many times as You
can! Each opportunity that you have to send it to a friend or media
outlet..do it!

I refuse to take a chance on this unknown candidate who came out of
nowhere.

*************************

Dear Friends,

As I was listening to a news program last night, I watched in horror as
Barack Obama made the statement with pride. . ."we are no longer a
Christian nation; we are now a nation of Christians, Jews, Muslims,
Buddhists, . . " As with so many other statements I've heard him (and his
wife) make, I never thought I'd see the day that I'd hear something like that
from a presidential candidate in this nation. To think our forefathers fought
and died for the right for our nation to be a Christian nation--and to have
this man say with pride that we are no longer that. How far this nation has
come from what our
founding fathers intended it to be.

I hope that each of you will do what I'm doing now--send your concerns,
written simply and sincerely, to the Christians on your email list. With God's
help, and He is still in control of this nation and all else, we can show this
man and the world in November that we are, indeed, still a Christian nation!

Please pray for our nation!

************************

The Obama Tidal Wave

We are witnessing a political phenomenon with Barack Obama of rare
magnitude. His speeches have inspired millions and yet most of his
followers have no idea of what he stands for except platitudes of 'Change'
or that he says he will be a 'Uniter.'

The power of speech from a charismatic person truly can be a powerful
thing. Certainly Billy Graham had charisma. Both his manner of speech and
particularly the content changed millions.

On the extreme other hand, the charisma of Adolph Hitler, too, inspired
millions and the results were catastrophic. Barack Obama certainly is no
Hitler or a Billy Graham, but for many Americans riding on the Obama Tidal
Wave it is just like a surfer who might be ecstatic and euphoric while riding
a tidal wave, but the reality of the ride is what happens when it hits shore.

Just Some of What Defines Barack Obama:

He voted for partial birth abortion.
He voted no on notifying parents of minors who get out-of-state abortions.

Supports affirmative action in Colleges and Government (quotas).

In 2001 he questioned harsh penalties for drug dealing as being too
severe.

Says he will deal with street level drug dealing as minimum wage affair.

Admitted his use of marijuana and cocaine in high school and in college.

His religious convictions are very murky.

He is willing to meet with Fidel Castro, Hugo Chavez, Kim Jung Il and
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

Has said that one of his first goals after being elected would be to have a
conference with all Muslim nations. Why?

Opposed the Patriot Act.

First bill he signed that was ever passed was campaign finance reform.

Voted to allow law suits against gun manufacturers.

Supports universal health-care.

Voted yes on providing habeas corpus for Guantanamo detainees.

Supports granting driver's licenses to illegal immigrants.

Supports extending welfare to illegal immigrants.

Voted yes on comprehensive immigration reform.

Voted yes on allowing 20 million illegal aliens to participate in Social
Security.

Wants to make the minimum wage a 'living wage.'
Voted with Democratic Party 96 percent of 251 votes. (241 votes Demo, 10
votes Republican)

Is a big believer in the separation of church and state.

He voted No on repealing the Alternative Minimum Tax which now hits
middle income brackets. = Tax Increase.

He voted No on repealing the 'Death' Tax. = Tax Increase.

He wants to raise the Capital Gains Tax. = Tax Increase.

Has repeatedly said the surge in Iraq has not succeeded...which is not true.

He is ranked as the most liberal Senator in the Senate today and that
takes some doing.

If your political choices are consistent with Barack Obama's and you think
that his positions will bring America together or make it a better place, then
you will probably enjoy the ride and not forward this Email. If you are like
other Americans that after examining what he stands for, are truly not in
line with his record, it would be prudent to get off the wave or better yet,
never get on, before it comes on shore and undermines the very
foundations of this great Country. We have limited time to save America or
the Supreme Court as we know it.

Inaction is action.
We have exactly 4 years to prevent him and a liberal Congress from being
reelected, and no one person is going to save you unless you save
yourselves. God helps those who help themselves!!! It may seem hard to
comprehend, but the best thing we can do is boycott the economy for the
next 4 years no matter how much it may hurt us. That means only buy what
you absolutely need to survive. If the economy improves during his
administration (even though it would be illusionary), he will get reelected
along with his supporting liberal colleagues who have no limits as to how
far they will go in persecuting English speaking, Christians in America.
They will even call a Constitutional Convention and rewrite the Constitution
in Obama's Image, and supposedly we are only 2 states away from that
already.


Below you will see what Patrick Henry said in 1775.
Read this in the orginal form. Then read this again, and change a few words:
Change "British ministry" to "federal government".
Change "kings" to "tyrants".
Change "Great Britain" to "Washington" .
Change "ministry and Parliament" to "federal government".
Change "throne" to "federal government".
Change "British guard" to "federal officer".
Change "Boston" to "Waco and Ruby Ridge".
Here is what Patrick Henry said on March 23, 1775:
No man thinks more highly than I do of the patriotism, as well as abilities, of the very
worthy gentlemen who have just addressed the House. But different men often see the
same subject in different lights; and, therefore, I hope it will not be thought disrespectful
to those gentlemen if, entertaining as I do opinions of a character very opposite to
theirs, I shall speak forth my sentiments freely and without reserve. This is no time for
ceremony. The questing before the House is one of awful moment to this country. For
my own part, I consider it as nothing less than a question of freedom or slavery; and in
proportion to the magnitude of the subject ought to be the freedom of the debate. It is
only in this way that we can hope to arrive at truth, and fulfill the great responsibility
which we hold to God and our country. Should I keep back my opinions at such a time,
through fear of giving offense, I should consider myself as guilty of treason towards my
country, and of an act of disloyalty toward the Majesty of Heaven, which I revere above
all earthly kings.
Mr. President, it is natural to man to indulge in the illusions of hope. We are apt to shut
our eyes against a painful truth, and listen to the song of that siren till she transforms us
into beasts. Is this the part of wise men, engaged in a great and arduous struggle for
liberty? Are we disposed to be of the number of those who, having eyes, see not, and,
having ears, hear not, the things which so nearly concern their temporal salvation? For
my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing to know the whole truth; to
know the worst, and to provide for it.
I have but one lamp by which my feet are guided, and that is the lamp of experience. I
know of no way of judging of the future but by the past. And judging by the past, I wish
to know what there has been in the conduct of the British ministry for the last ten years
to justify those hopes with which gentlemen have been pleased to solace themselves
and the House. Is it that insidious smile with which our petition has been lately
received? Trust it not, sir; it will prove a snare to your feet. Suffer not yourselves to be
betrayed with a kiss. Ask yourselves how this gracious reception of our petition
comports with those warlike preparations which cover our waters and darken our land.
Are fleets and armies necessary to a work of love and reconciliation? Have we shown
ourselves so unwilling to be reconciled that force must be called in to win back our love?
Let us not deceive ourselves, sir. These are the implements of war and subjugation; the
last arguments to which kings resort. I ask gentlemen, sir, what means this martial
array, if its purpose be not to force us to submission? Can gentlemen assign any other
possible motive for it? Has Great Britain any enemy, in this quarter of the world, to call
for all this accumulation of navies and armies? No, sir, she has none. They are meant
for us: they can be meant for no other. They are sent over to bind and rivet upon us
those chains which the British ministry have been so long forging. And what have we to
oppose to them? Shall we try argument? Sir, we have been trying that for the last ten
years. Have we anything new to offer upon the subject? Nothing. We have held the
subject up in every light of which it is capable; but it has been all in vain. Shall we resort
to entreaty and humble supplication? What terms shall we find which have not been
already exhausted? Let us not, I beseech you, sir, deceive ourselves. Sir, we have done
everything that could be done to avert the storm which is now coming on. We have
petitioned; we have remonstrated; we have supplicated; we have prostrated ourselves
before the throne, and have implored its interposition to arrest the tyrannical hands of
the ministry and Parliament. Our petitions have been slighted; our remonstrances have
produced additional violence and insult; our supplications have been disregarded; and
we have been spurned, with contempt, from the foot of the throne! In vain, after these
things, may we indulge the fond hope of peace and reconciliation. There is no longer
any room for hope. If we wish to be free-- if we mean to preserve inviolate those
inestimable privileges for which we have been so long contending-- if we mean not
basely to abandon the noble struggle in which we have been so long engaged, and
which we have pledged ourselves never to abandon until the glorious object of our
contest shall be obtained--we must fight! I repeat it, sir, we must fight! An appeal to
arms and to the God of hosts is all that is left us!
They tell us, sir, that we are weak; unable to cope with so formidable an adversary. But
when shall we be stronger? Will it be the next week, or the next year? Will it be when
we are totally disarmed, and when a British guard shall be stationed in every house?
Shall we gather strength by irresolution and inaction? Shall we acquire the means of
effectual resistance by lying supinely on our backs and hugging the delusive phantom of
hope, until our enemies shall have bound us hand and foot? Sir, we are not weak if we
make a proper use of those means which the God of nature hath placed in our power.
The millions of people, armed in the holy cause of liberty, and in such a country as that
which we possess, are invincible by any force which our enemy can send against us.
Besides, sir, we shall not fight our battles alone. There is a just God who presides over
the destinies of nations, and who will raise up friends to fight our battles for us. The
battle, sir, is not to the strong alone; it is to the vigilant, the active, the brave. Besides,
sir, we have no election. If we were base enough to desire it, it is now too late to retire
from the contest. There is no retreat but in submission and slavery! Our chains are
forged! Their clanking may be heard on the plains of Boston! The war is inevitable-- and
let it come! I repeat it, sir, let it come.
It is in vain, sir, to extenuate the matter. Gentlemen may cry, Peace, Peace-- but there
is no peace. The war is actually begun! The next gale that sweeps from the north will
bring to our ears the clash of resounding arms! Our brethren are already in the field!
Why stand we here idle? What is it that gentlemen wish? What would they have? Is life
so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?
Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me
liberty or give me death!
****************************************************
p.s. Patrick Henry was an eloquent speaker, but more important than the gift of speech
was his loyalty to America, to the Constitution when completed, and to the principles of
limited government, liberty, and justice for American citizens. Personally, I knew that
when Bush called the minutemen who are helping the border patrol perform their
constitutional duties 'vigilantes,' that was my wake up call. When Ramos and Compean
were prosecuted for shooting a drug dealer attempting to cross the border, it only
confirmed what I already knew. After that, I found out the supreme court was actually
debating the 2nd amendment and deciding whether the right to own guns only applied
to miiltias. In my mind, everyone has a God given right to protect themselves, their
family, and their property with deadly force if necessary and that is what the founders
intended. The wording is somewhat ambiguous though, and I suspect the supreme
court only ruled in our favor to avoid a full scale rebellion. I understand now, that the
Obama administration has adopted a philosophy of gradualism on all their socialist
agendas so people won't notice, taking small steps such as requiring all ammunition to
be coded and computer records maintained, to eventually make owning a gun a moot
point when they stop allowing ammunition to be manufactured and/or imported.
Then I found out about the 10th amendment to the constitution.
"The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it
to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people."
This means that 90% of the laws Congress has passed are unconstitutional. About the
only powers congress really has are the requirements to prevent invasion, regulate
commerce, and declare war. All the drug laws, gun laws, and all the agencies they have
created such as the department of education are unconstitutional. These are all state
responsibilities.
Had enough yet??? Then boycott the economy, let's bring it all down, and let's start
over and get it right this time. The government can declare bankruptcy, if necessary
each state will secede from the union, and we can form a new union debt free, with
additional provisions to ensure that our traditional way of life is not compromised, and
our new government is limited to only a few responsibilities such as social security,
medicaid, and national defense. In reality, we wouldn't even need a national defense if
we set up state sponsored militias that included the average citizen who wanted to own
a gun, and was willing to pay a membership fee of $30 per year to fund it. Although it
would be preferential to have both so we can remain the world's policeman.
The other alternative is for the government to just print up the money and pay off our
debt, eliminate all federal agencies that are unconstitutional and transfer as many
employees as possible to the state level, nullify all the unconstitutional laws they have
passed, and come clean to the American people and admit they betrayed us. That's not
likely to happen since we all know that only a handful of people in Congress like Ron
Paul have the backbone to speak out.
We can promise you that there is nothing radical about being a loyal American.
Remember, Patrick Henry was called a radical when he said "Give me liberty or give me
death," and encouraged separation due to taxation without representation. Today, we
submit to you, that now we have our own government who is taxing us without
representing us.
******************************************

Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers
from the consent of the governed, - That whenever any Form of
Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the
People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government. ~
Declaration of Independence 2nd paragraph~


                     Pastor Martin Niemoller's famous warning
                         to his fellow Germans after WWII.
                          When the Nazis came for the communists, I
                           remained silent; I was not a communist.

                         When they locked up the social democrats, I
                         remained silent; I was not a social democrat.

                         When they came for the trade unionists, I did
                          not speak out; I was not a trade unionist.

                              When they came for the Jews, I did
                               not speak out; I was not a Jew.

When they came for me, there
was no one left to speak out.


                       http://protectourborder.net/storm.JPG
               Don McAlvany's Book Prophetically Written In 1995
http://protectourborder.net/wakeup.rtf
http://protectourborder.net/wakeup2.rtf
http://protectourborder.net/jokes.rtf
http://protectourborder.net/jokes2.rtf
http://protectourborder.net/jokes3.rtf
http://protectourborder.net/gringodollars.doc

								
To top