HKScan Corporation: Company Profile and SWOT Analysis - PDF - PDF by ICDResearch

VIEWS: 5 PAGES: 36

More Info
									HKScan Corporation

_________________________________________________________________________________



HKScan Corporation                                                   Financial Snapshot

                                                                     Operating Performance
Fast Facts
                                                                     The company reported revenue of US$2,825.60
Headquarters Address            Kaivokatu 18, Turku, 20521,Finland
                                                                     million during the fiscal year 2010 (2010). The
                                                                     company's revenue grew at a CAGR of 24.58%
Telephone                           + 358 10 570100
                                                                     during 2006–2010, with an annual decline of -4.55%
                                                                     over 2009. In 2010, the company recorded an
Fax                                 + 358 10 5706146                 operating margin of 2.27%, as against 2.59% in
                                                                     <2009.
Website                         www.hkscan.com

Ticker Symbol, Stock Exchange   HKSAV, Helsinki Stock Exchange       Revenue and Margins

Number of Employees             8,058

Fiscal Year End                 December

Revenue (in US$ million)        2,825.60

Revenue (in EUR million)        2,119.20




SWOT Analysis
                                                                     Return on Equity
Strengths                       Weaknesses
                                                                     The company recorded a return on equity (ROE) of
Broad Business Portfolio        Substantial Debts                    6.65% for 2010, as compared to its peers, Ter Beke
                                                                     NV (Ticker: TERB), Polski Koncern Miesny DUDA
                                                                     S.A. (Ticker: DUD) and Chr. Hansen Holding A/S
Focus on Quality                Weak Operating Performance           (Ticker: CHR), which recorded ROEs of 11.74%,
                                                                     10.38% and 3.28% respectively. The company
Strong R&D Activities                                                reported a net profit margin of 2.27% in 2010.


Opportunities                   Threats                              Return on Equity

Recovering Economy              Evolving Consumer Preferences

Strategic Acquisition           Risks from Epidemics




                                                                     Liquidity Position

                                                                     The company reported a current ratio of 1.13 in 2010,
                                                                     as compared to its peers, Ter Beke NV, Polski
                                                                     Koncern Miesny DUDA S.A. and Chr. Hansen Holding
                                                                     A/S, which recorded current ratios of 0.90, 1.00 and
                                                                     1.54 respectively. As of December 2010, the
                                                                     company recorded cash and short-term investments
                                                                     of worth US$97.87 million, against US$204.00 million
                                                                     current debt. The company reported a debt to equity
                                                                     ratio of 1.23 in 2010 as compared to its peers, Ter
                                                                     Beke NV, Polski Koncern Miesny DUDA S.A. and
                                                                     Chr. Hansen Holding A/S, which recorded debt to
                                                                     equity ratios of 0.70, 0.85 and 0.99 respectively.




___________________________________________________________________________________________

HKScan Corporation - SWOT Profile                                                                           Page 1
HKScan Corporation

_________________________________________________________________________________


TABLE OF CONTENTS

1     Business Analysis ................................................................................................................................... 5
    1.1       Company Overview ................................................................................................................................................5
    1.2       Business Description ..............................................................................................................................................5
    1.3       Major Products and Services .................................................................................................................................6
2     Analysis of Key Performance Indicators ............................................................................................... 7
    2.1       Five Year Snapshot: Overview of Financial and Operational Performance Indicators ..........................................7
    2.2       Key Financial Performance Indicators .................................................................................................................10
      2.2.1       Revenue and Operating Profit .........................................................................................................................10
      2.2.2       Asset, Liabilities and Capex .............................................................................................................................11
      2.2.3       Net Debt vs. Gearing Ratio ..............................................................................................................................12
      2.2.4       Operational Efficiency ......................................................................................................................................13
      2.2.5       Solvency ..........................................................................................................................................................14
      2.2.6       Valuation ..........................................................................................................................................................15
    2.3       Competitive Benchmarking ..................................................................................................................................16
      2.3.1       Efficiency ..........................................................................................................................................................17
      2.3.2       Capital Expenditure ..........................................................................................................................................18
      2.3.3       Turnover – Inventory and Asset .......................................................................................................................19
      2.3.4       Liquidity ............................................................................................................................................................20
3     Recent Developments .................................................................................
								
To top