Embed
Email

Dignity Intervention for Terminally Ill Patients

Document Sample

Shared by: ewghwehws
Categories
Tags
Stats
views:
5
posted:
1/2/2012
language:
pages:
37
Dignity Intervention for

Terminally Ill Patients



Professor Linda Kristjanson

Prof Harvey Chochinov

Dr Tom Hack

Dr Sue McClement

Dr Mike Harlos

Dr Tom Hassard

Dr William Brietbart

Clinical Challenge

 How to address suffering of dying patients



 Suffering that derives from psychosocial,

spiritual or existential domains of the

patient ’s experience



 Over past 15 years – international

collaboration to develop, pilot test and

complete an RCT to test an intervention

aimed at decreasing suffering and

increasing sense of dignity

Sense of Dignity Responses (n=213)

Responses Prevalence

0 No sense of lost dignity 114 (53%)

1 Minimal sense of lost dignity 64 (30%)

2 Mild; sense of lost dignity occasionally; 19 (9%)

regarded as minor problem

3 Moderate sense of lost dignity; regards 11 (5%)

as significant problem

4 Strong; feels clear sense of lost dignity 5 (2%)

most of time

5 Severe; clear sense of lost dignity almost 0 (0%)

always present

6 Extreme; sense of lost dignity virtually 0 (0%)

constant

Intact versus Fractured Dignity:

Psychological Variables

 Desire for death (p 3 years



 108 (33%) assigned to Standard



Care

 107 (33%) assigned to Client



Centred Care

 11 (34%) assigned to Dignity Care

Results

 Baseline measures for all pre-study

psychometrics were calculated and

reported

 Sample did not demonstrate a high



prevalence of major or overwhelming

problems with most sources of

distress as measured by Patient

Dignity Inventory

 No significant differences found



across study arms

Results

 Dignity Therapy outperformed Client

Centred Care and Standard Care on

all 25 PDI items

 Dignity Therapy outperformed the



other study arms on the following:

• having found the study helpful,

• improving quality of life,

• depression

• sense of dignity

Results

 Dignity Therapy also significantly

outperformed Standard Care and

Client Centred Care on:



• changing how family sees and

appreciates them



• indicating that the study has or will be

of help to their family

Results

 Dignity Therapy also significantly

outperformed one of the two other

study arms on the following:

• having been as helpful as any other

aspect of care

• improving spiritual well being

• feeling that it enabled being able to

carry out an important task or role

• feeling satisfied with the study arm

• causing life to feel more meaningful

• and a heightened sense of purpose

Qualitative Feedback

I’m very happy to have participated in

this project. It’s helped bring my

memories, thoughts and feelings into

perspective instead of all jumbled

emotions running through my head.

The most important thing has been that

I’m able to leave a sort of “ insight “ of

myself for my husband and children,

and all my family and friends.



36 year old mother and wife with metastatic breast cancer

I believe dignity therapy will be a lot

of help to many people. [I] thought it

was brilliant. It has lightened my

spirits- because I wouldn ’t have had

the emotional courage to put it

down.



63 year old woman with ovarian cancer

Dignity therapy was a lovely

experience.... Getting down on paper

what I thought was a dull boring life

really opened my eye’s to how much

I really have done. This could be

nothing but helpful to many ill

people. I thoroughly recommend it

for everyone…..

49 year old woman with advance breast cancer

Last Word

 You matter because you are you,

and you matter until the last

moment of your life. We will do all

we can, not only to help you die

peacefully, but also to live until

you die (Dame Cicely Saunders,

1993).



Related docs
Other docs by ewghwehws
By registering with docstoc.com you agree to our
privacy policy

You are almost ready to download!

You are almost ready to download!