Embed
Email

Philosophy of Pornography

Document Sample
Philosophy of Pornography
Shared by: mkoop18
Categories
Tags
Stats
views:
32
posted:
12/31/2011
language:
pages:
3
Vandenberg PHI-102 T/TH 8:30 Megan Kupres





Robert Jensen, Associate Professor of the Communication Department at the University



of Texas at Austin, began his lecture by asking members of a packed audience to finish the



statement, “Pornography is…” Upon his command, answers to this question were shouted across



the room. While some people claimed it is “misogynistic” and “degrading to women,” others



argued that it is “a form of art,” “misrepresented,” “empowering,” and “someone’s job.” These



are incredibly varied responses and reveal the longstanding controversial nature of this



confounding issue.





Jensen revealed a very perplexing paradox that pornography poses. Without a doubt,



pornography has become more mainstream and widely available. It is a billion dollar industry



that has taken over Hollywood culture and has seeped into the lives of all those who own a



television. At the same time, pornography is undeniably degrading to women and often presents



a manner of racism. Thus the paradox arises—how can a media genre be so degrading, and at the



same time, be so widely accepted? Jensen asserts that pornography is what the end of the world



would look like when the very basic human capacity for empathy and morality is eroded and



replaced with an abundance of overwhelming animalistic cravings that portrays women as sex



objects and commodities.





Aquinas contends that inclinations should not be avoided. If God gave one a certain



inclination, then there is a reason for it. Sexual tendencies are inherent qualities for all human



beings. Without this urge to have sex and thus reproduce, how would all of humanity exist? This



is indisputable. What is questionable, however, is whether or not Aquinas would regard



pornography—visual sexual stimulation—as an acceptable outlet for sexual gratification. My



guess is not. Pornography is visual stimulation and doesn’t necessarily reach or entirely satisfy



one’s sexual desires. Pornography feeds into primarily males’ fantasies and creates a longing for

Vandenberg PHI-102 T/TH 8:30 Megan Kupres





more realistic applications of the images. Oftentimes they imagine replicating porn’s style into



everyday relationships and interactions, which sometimes simply isn’t possible. Thus, as mere



gratification leaving more to be desired, Aquinas would argue that it is not true happiness.





Seventy-percent of porn consumers are men. Pornography feeds into the desires of these



viewers or consumers. The porn industry has adopted new porn techniques and continues to



increase its revenue due to its increasing demand. Ostensibly, with regards to Hume’s Greatest



Happiness Principle, pornography would be an acceptable art form—bringing the greatest



happiness to the greatest amount of people. However, the desire for sex is an animalistic faculty



and not a true means to happiness. In that case, pornography—a billion dollar industry and



growing representation of our culture—can’t even amount to higher, more intellectual faculties.



What does this say about our society? Yes, pornography is created and distributed upon demand,



but is this not somewhat embarrassing that the top industry in our nation is one that produces



films, pictures, toys, video games and other products that essentially place women as



commodities? Is this really what we cherish most?





In addition, pornography lacks certain reciprocity. While the viewer is satisfied, others



are harmed in the process. Yes, some women have created luxurious lifestyles for themselves



from the porn industry; it’s somewhat disturbing to know that this success was achieved by



essentially selling their bodies. The porn industry has turned women into commodities. This is a



harmful message to women and can result in false interpretations of their sexuality and how they



should perceive themselves. In relationships, it can be discouraging to a wife or girlfriend to



know that a partner is looking at porn, sending the underlying message that “any woman can



fulfill the job I am doing.”

Vandenberg PHI-102 T/TH 8:30 Megan Kupres





Pornography is controversial. It has grown into a billion dollar industry and is projected



to grow even more. It has provided jobs for innumerable women across the globe. At the same



time, its underlying degradation of women cannot be ignored. It’s unreasonable to suppose that



pornography can be eliminated—it’s become far too popular for that. However, its appearance in



other more public media venues, such as music videos and movies, should be regulated or



monitored more closely.


Related docs
Other docs by mkoop18
PRIMARY RESEARCH TITLE PAGE
Views: 22  |  Downloads: 0
primary research report
Views: 20  |  Downloads: 0
Review of "Dralion" from Cirque de Soleil
Views: 11  |  Downloads: 0
Professional Writing Resource
Views: 5  |  Downloads: 0
Analysis of Margarita
Views: 11  |  Downloads: 0
Cover document
Views: 2  |  Downloads: 0
memo final
Views: 7  |  Downloads: 0
Alternate Resume
Views: 9  |  Downloads: 0
Megg Kupres' Resume
Views: 10  |  Downloads: 0
Philosophy of Pornography
Views: 32  |  Downloads: 1
By registering with docstoc.com you agree to our
privacy policy

You are almost ready to download!

You are almost ready to download!