Jordan Journal of Chemistry

Document Sample
Jordan Journal of Chemistry Powered By Docstoc
					                   Jordan Journal of Mathematics and statistics
                               Manuscript Review Form
Information for the Editors: (Information to be withheld from authors)

Manuscript No.:                (                                            )
Author(s):
                             Hidden to the Reviewer but open to Editors


Title:




Reviewer’s Name:       (                                                    )

Reviewer’s Expertise on the Topic: (Please select ( ) one of the following items)
   I am an expert on the subject of this manuscript
   I am well acquainted with the subject of this manuscript
   I am familiar with the general subject of this manuscript

Reviewer’s Recommendation: (Please select ( ) one of the following items)
        Accept for publication
        Accept for publication after minor modifications
        Review again after major modifications
        Reject

Comments to the Editors: (Information to be withheld from authors)
                                                     2

                      Overall Assessment: (To be returned to authors)

Manuscript No.:                    (                                                     )

Author(s):
                                 Hidden to the Reviewer but open to Editors


Title:




Please check scores from 1 to 4 on each item of the Aspects indicated below,
                             according to the following scale:

         4:   Strongly Accept (Excellent quality, cutting edge ideas)
         3:   Accept (Good quality, sound and interesting results)
         2:   Weakly Accept (I vote acceptance, but will not argue for it)
         1:   Strongly Reject (Unsuitable for publication in this Journal)

Aspects (Please check ( ) the appropriate score for each of the following aspects):
   Originality:                                      1.            2.           3.           4. 
   Methodology:                                      1.            2.           3.           4. 
   Novelty of Approach                               1.            2.           3.           4. 
   Adequacy of Documentation                         1.            2.           3.           4. 
   Significance:                                     1.            2.           3.           4. 
   Technical Quality:                                1.            2.           3.           4. 
   Clarity and organization:                         1.            2.           3.           4. 
   ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Overall Rating:                                   1.            2.           3.           4. 

Does the manuscript require much technical rewriting? Yes.                                       No. 

Does the language require improvement?                                           Yes.            No. 
         If yes, please check ( ) one of the following items:
                         Language could be improved by the Editorial Office.
                         Language must be improved by the Author(s).

Detailed Comments and Suggestions to the Author(s):
On the following page(s), please provide specific comments on the research contribution,
in addition to suggestions you deem relevant and may help authors to improve the overall
quality of the manuscript.
                                     3
Comments and Suggestions to the Authors (You may add more pages, if necessary)

				
DOCUMENT INFO
Shared By:
Categories:
Tags:
Stats:
views:0
posted:12/30/2011
language:
pages:3