CHRONOLOGY/LIST OF DOCUMENTS RELATING TO
LONDON BOROUGH OF CAMDEN – (ACCC/C/2011/60)
1. Email to Applicant from Mr. Aiden Brookes, Legal Services, Camden Council,
confirming the refusal by Camden Council to accept a planning related deputation from
the Applicant – dated 31 March 2010
2. 1 complaint concerning refusal by Camden Council to accept planning related
deputations from the Applicant to Mr. Peter Swingler, Central Complaints, Camden
Council – dated 8 April 2011
3. Letter to Applicant from Mr. Aiden Brookes, Legal Services, Camden Council, under
the Freedom of Information Act 2000, regarding the refusal by Camden Council to
accept planning related deputations from the Applicant – dated 10 August 2010
4. Email to Applicant from Ms Vicki Wemyss-Cooke, informing the Applicant that his
requests for four oral deputations wouldn’t be accepted – dated 3 November 2010
5. 2 complaint from the Applicant to Mr. Peter Swingler, Central Complaints, Camden
Council, concerning refusal by Camden Council to accept planning committee
deputations – dated 3 November 2010
6. Email to Applicant from Ms Vicki Wemyss-Cooke, Senior Principle Committee Officer,
Camden Council, further confirming to the Applicant that four planning committee
deputations made by him were being refused – dated 8 November 2010
7. Letter to Applicant from Mr. Aiden Brookes, Legal Services, Camden Council,
confirming the refusal by Camden Council to accept planning committee deputations
from the Applicant – dated 11 November 2010
8. Letter to Applicant from Ms Asha Paul, Head of Democratic Services, Camden Council,
confirming that the Council considered that the Applicant’s complaint concerning the
refusal by Camden Council to accept the Applicant’s planning committee deputations
didn’t fall within the Council’s internal complaints scheme – dated 12 November 2010
9. Letter from the Applicant to Mr. Peter Swingler, Central Complaints, Camden Council,
concerning refusal by Camden Council to accept complaints under the Council’s internal
complaints scheme relating to refusal of planning committee deputations – dated 13
November 2010
10. 2 renewed complaint from the Applicant to Mr. Peter Swingler, Central Complaints,
Camden Council, concerning the refusal by Camden Council to accept the Applicant’s
planning committee deputations – dated 14 November 2010
11. Email to Applicant from Mr. Steward Holmes, Complaints Investigation Officer,
Camden Council, confirming that the Council considered that the Applicant’s complaint
concerning the refusal by Committee Services Camden Council to accept the
1
Applicant’s planning committee deputations didn’t fall within the Council’s internal
complaints scheme – dated 15 November 2010
12. 1 Email to Applicant from Ms Hannah Hutter, Principle Committee Officer Camden
Council, concerning the Applicant’s planning committee deputation request and the time
to be allotted to it – dated 23 November 2010
13. 2 Email to Applicant from Ms Hannah Hutter, Principle Committee Officer, Camden
Council, concerning the Applicant’s planning committee deputation request, and
confirming that the Applicant’s requests for oral deputations wouldn’t be accepted –
dated 23 November 2010
14. Email to Applicant from Ms Vicki Wemyss-Cooke, Senior Principle Committee Officer,
Camden Council, confirming that the Applicant’s requests for oral deputations wouldn’t
be accepted, but only his written submissions and objections to an adjourned planning
application would be copied for the information of the Development Control Committee
at their meeting to be held on 15 December 2010, – dated 8 December 2010
15. Email to Applicant from Ms Vicki Wemyss-Cooke, Senior Principle Committee Officer,
Camden Council, confirming that the Applicant’s written submissions and objections to
an adjourned planning application would be copied for the information of the
Development Control Committee at their meeting to be held on 15 December 2010 –
dated 15 December 2010
16. Email to Applicant from Ms Hannah Hutter, Principle Committee Officer, Camden
Council, concerning the Applicant’s 2 planning committee deputation requests, and
confirming that the Applicant’s requests for oral deputations wouldn’t be accepted –
dated 12 January 2011
(The Applicant has only included the documents which he considers relevant to the issue of
whether or not the Convention requires that members of the public be permitted to present
oral argument to planning authorities. There are of course background documents to the
various deputation requests made and also the planning application reports themselves, but
the Applicant hasn’t included these. If DFRA wishes to include any further documents
however, then that will be a matter for them.)
2