Your Federal Quarterly Tax Payments are due April 15th Get Help Now >>

2008 – 2009 by gegeshandong

VIEWS: 7 PAGES: 45

									2011-2012 School Improvement Plan (SIP)-Form SIP-1




                             FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION




                                    School Improvement Plan (SIP)
                                             Form SIP-1

                                                Proposed for 2011-2012


April 2011                                                               1
Rule 6A-1.099811
Revised April 29, 2011
  2011-2012 School Improvement Plan (SIP)-Form SIP-1

                                                         2011 – 2012 SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN


  PART I: SCHOOL INFORMATION

  School Name: Lloyd Estates Elementary                                                         District Name: Broward
  Principal: Pamela A. Govoni                                                                   Superintendent: TBA
  SAC Chair: Marjorie Gomez, Andrew Piehler                                                     Date of School Board Approval: TBA


  Student Achievement Data:
  The following links will open in a separate browser window. .

  School Grades Trend Data (Use this data to complete Sections 1-4 of the reading and mathematics goals and Sections 1 and 2 of the writing and science goals.)
  Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Trend Data (Use this data to complete Sections 5A-5D of the reading and mathematics goals and Section 3A-3D of the writing goals.)
  Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) Trend Data (Use this data to inform the problem-solving process when writing goals.)


  Highly Qualified Administrators

  List your school’s highly qualified administrators and briefly describe their certification(s), number of years at the current school, number of years as an administrator, and their
  prior performance record with increasing student achievement at each school. Include history of school grades, FCAT performance (Percentage data for Proficiency, Learning
  Gains, Lowest 25%), and Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP).
Position    Name                             Degree(s)/                     Number of          Number of Years      Prior Performance Record (include prior School Grades, FCAT
                                             Certification(s)               Years at           as an                (Proficiency, Learning Gains, Lowest 25%), and AYP information
                                                                            Current School     Administrator        along with the associated school year)
Principal   Pamela Govoni                    MS Educational                 4                  11                   Lloyd Estates Elementary:
                                             Leadership                                                             2010:
                                             BA Elementary Education
                                             K-6 Elementary Education
                                                                                                                    Grade "B" No AYP
                                             ESOL                                                                   High Standards-67% Reading/76% Math
                                             Early Childhood                                                        Learning Gains-58% Reading/67% Math
  April 2011                                                                                                                                                                          2
  Rule 6A-1.099811
  Revised April 29, 2011
  2011-2012 School Improvement Plan (SIP)-Form SIP-1
                                             Education                                                              Lowest-25%-52% Reading/77% Math
                                             School Principal                                                       2009:
                                                                                                                    Grade "C" No AYP
                                                                                                                    High Standards-69% Reading/70% Math
                                                                                                                    Learning Gains-61% Reading/61% Math
                                                                                                                    Lowest 25% 42%Reading/62% Math
                                                                                                                    2008:
                                                                                                                    Grade “B” No AYP
                                                                                                                    High Standards-65% Reading/76% Math
                                                                                                                    Learning Gains-59% Reading/72% Math
                                                                                                                    Lowest 25%-62% Reading/64% Math
Assistant   Orinthia Dias                    Ed.S. Educational              1                  6                    Coral Springs Middle:
Principal                                    Leadership                                                             2010:
                                             MS Education
                                             BA Education
                                                                                                                    Grade "A"/No AYP
                                             Middle Grades Science 5-                                               High Standards-78% Reading/76% Math
                                             9                                                                      Learning Gains-67% Reading/70% Math
                                             Educational Leadership K-                                              Lowest 25%-67% Reading/58% Math
                                             12                                                                     2009:
                                             ESOL
                                                                                                                    Grade "A"/No AYP
                                                                                                                    High Standards-78% Reading/78% Math
                                                                                                                    Learning Gains-72% Reading/73% Math
                                                                                                                    Lowest 25%-73% Reading/64% Math
                                                                                                                    2008:
                                                                                                                    Grade "A"/No AYP
                                                                                                                    High Standards-75% Reading/78% Math
                                                                                                                    Learning Gains-67% Reading/74% Math
                                                                                                                    Lowest 25%-62% Reading/59% Math


  Highly Qualified Instructional Coaches

  List your school’s highly qualified instructional coaches and briefly describe their certification(s), number of years at the current school, number of years as an instructional coach,
  and their prior performance record with increasing student achievement at each school. Include history of school grades, FCAT performance (Percentage data for Proficiency,


  April 2011                                                                                                                                                                         3
  Rule 6A-1.099811
  Revised April 29, 2011
 2011-2012 School Improvement Plan (SIP)-Form SIP-1
 Learning Gains, Lowest 25%), and Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP). Instructional coaches described in this section are only those who are fully released or part-time teachers in
 reading, mathematics, or science and work only at the school site.
 Subject                   Name                     Degree(s)/             Number of        Number of Years as     Prior Performance Record (include prior School Grades, FCAT
  Area                                            Certification(s)           Years at                an            (Proficiency, Learning Gains, Lowest 25%), and AYP
                                                                         Current School     Instructional Coach    information along with the associated school year)
Reading      Troy Robinson                  Elem. Ed. 1-6                7.5                7.5                    2010 “B” No AYP
                                            ESOL                                                                   2009 “C” No AYP
                                            School Principal                                                       2008 “B” No AYP
                                            Reading Endorsement                                                    2007 “B” No AYP




 Highly Qualified Teachers
 Describe the school-based strategies that will be used to recruit and retain high quality, highly qualified teachers to the school.

 Description of Strategy                                               Person Responsible                    Projected Completion Date         Not Applicable
                                                                                                                                               (If not, please explain why)
 1.   NCBT receive additional monies to meet the needs of students     Principal                             10/2011
      of a Title 1 school
 2.   Professional Development on Pre-Planning and Planning Days       Principal, Assistant Principal        6/2012
 3.   Team Leaders provide support to grade level and support          Team Leaders                          6/2012
      teachers
 4.   Leadership Team and Support Staff provide information,           Leadership Team, Support Staff        6/2012
      training and support to all LEES Staff members.
 5.   Professional Learning Communities provide training to identify   Reading Coach, Suzanne Assad,         6/2012
      effective teacher skills and strategies.                         Emmy Louvaris, Catina Huntley,
                                                                       Carmen Rivera




 April 2011                                                                                                                                                                   4
 Rule 6A-1.099811
 Revised April 29, 2011
2011-2012 School Improvement Plan (SIP)-Form SIP-1


Non-Highly Qualified Instructors
List all instructional staff and paraprofessionals who are teaching out-of-field and/or who are NOT highly qualified.

Name                                              Certification                     Teaching Assignment              Professional Development/Support to Become Highly Qualified
None




Staff Demographics

Please complete the following demographic information about the instructional staff in the school.

*When using percentages, include the number of teachers the percentage represents (e.g., 70% (35)).

Total Number       % of First-Year   % of Teachers       % of Teachers        % of Teachers       % of Teachers    % Highly        % Reading        % National        %
of Instructional   Teachers          with 1-5 Years of   with 6-14 Years of   with 15+ Years of   with Advanced    Qualified       Endorsed         Board Certified   ESOL Endorsed
Staff                                Experience          Experience           Experience          Degrees          Teachers        Teachers         Teachers          Teachers

29                 8% (2.5)          3% (1)              57% (16.5)           31% (9)             41.4% (12)       100%            7% (2)           13.8% (4)         100%




Teacher Mentoring Program

Please describe the school’s teacher mentoring program by including the names of mentors, the name(s) of mentees, rationale for the pairing, and the planned
mentoring activities.

Mentor Name                                       Mentee Assigned                                 Rationale for Pairing                        Planned Mentoring Activities

Winnifred Walters                                 Deshaun Sweet                                   New teacher to grade 3                       Orientation to the role of a Gr. 3
                                                                                                                                               teacher, introduction to Gr.
                                                                                                                                               53curriculum, materials, IFC’s, test
                                                                                                                                               specifications, assist with planning and
                                                                                                                                               intervention strategies.
Deborah Lacek                                     New Art teacher, new Music teacher              New “specials” teachers to our school        Orientation to the school, assist with

April 2011                                                                                                                                                                        5
Rule 6A-1.099811
Revised April 29, 2011
2011-2012 School Improvement Plan (SIP)-Form SIP-1
                                                                                                                            planning and acquiring supplies, and
                                                                                                                            provide an overview to the “specials”
                                                                                                                            support model.
Suzanne Assad                                   Alfreda Footman                    New to teacher to the grade 5 level      Orientation to the role of a Gr. 5
                                                                                                                            teacher, introduction to Gr. 5
                                                                                                                            curriculum, materials, IFC’s, test
                                                                                                                            specifications, assist with planning and
                                                                                                                            intervention strategies.




Additional Requirements
Coordination and Integration-Title I Schools Only
Please describe how federal, state, and local services and programs will be coordinated and integrated in the school. Include other Title programs, Migrant and
Homeless, Supplemental Academic Instruction funds, as well as violence prevention programs, nutrition programs, housing programs, Head Start, adult education,
career and technical education, and/or job training, as applicable.

Title I, Part A
Professional Development, Parent training, textbooks to support
student learning.
• Additional assistance via teacher salaries to meet the needs of
struggling students.
. The Title l initiative is explained to parents at our annual Open
House and via the Parent-School Compact which is sent home to
families on the first day of school.
. Parents are notified of meetings and events via Parent Link.
Flyers are sent home in multiple languages. A Spanish Speaking
clerk is available in our front office for immediate Spanish
translation.
Title I, Part C- Migrant

Title I, Part D

Title II



April 2011                                                                                                                                                     6
Rule 6A-1.099811
Revised April 29, 2011
2011-2012 School Improvement Plan (SIP)-Form SIP-1
Title III
• CAVS trained staff and implementation of materials; Spanish
instruction, weekly
• Program for staff and students; Decree met for English, Spanish and
Haitian-Creole requirements
• Teacher Assistants working with small groups of ESOL
students at most grade levels.
• All ESOL students will be placed with a specialized team of 2 teachers, K-5
Title X- Homeless

Supplemental Academic Instruction (SAI)
• Pull-out and push-in models utilized to assist struggling students during the
school day.
. SAI funds provide additional learning opportunities beyond the
school day.
Violence Prevention Programs
• Anti-Bullying Policy (Project Bridge), Just Say No Program (Red
Ribbon Week), SBBC Discipline Matrix.
• Threat Assessment trained Support Staff.
Nutrition Programs
• Commit to be Fit: Grade 3
• Reduced-fat and sugar SBBC meals
• University of Florida Nutrition Program, K-2
Housing Programs
N/A


Head Start
• The Head Start Program is a national program that offers free comprehensive child development services to economically disadvantaged children and families.
One Head Start Class, 1:18 ratio, with a Teacher Assistant at all times.

Adult Education

Career and Technical Education

Job Training
Other



April 2011                                                                                                                                                      7
Rule 6A-1.099811
Revised April 29, 2011
2011-2012 School Improvement Plan (SIP)-Form SIP-1
Response to Instruction/Intervention (RtI)
                                                                                School-Based RtI Team
Identify the school-based RtI Leadership Team.
• The RtI Leadership Team will include the following: ESE Specialist, Carolyn Reidy; Guidance Counselor, Cindy Tabio; Reading Specialist; Principal, Pamela Govoni; Assistant
Principal, Orinthia Dias; Psychologist, Daisy Amador; Social Worker,Victoria Shreiber; Team Leader; Classroom teacher, and Parent(s).

Describe how the school-based RtI Leadership Team functions (e.g., meeting processes and roles/functions). How does it work with other school teams to
organize/coordinate RtI efforts?
Meetings are scheduled two times per month to identify students struggling in reading, writing, math and/or behavior. At the first meeting, roles and responsibilities will be assigned to
RtI Team Members. Interventions will be prescribed based on data, progress being noted by the teacher and student individual needs. Progress monitoring and follow-up meetings will
be scheduled to develop small group interventions for struggling students.

Describe the role of the school-based RtI Leadership Team in the development and implementation of the school improvement plan. Describe how the RtI Problem-
solving process is used in developing and implementing the SIP?
ESE Specialist will coordinate meetings and the grade level Team Leader will serve as case manager for a specific student as assigned. The RtI Leadership Team members monitor the
action steps of the School Improvement Plan in a focus group. Additionally, emphasis on goal attainment will be revisited by the team leaders, teachers, support staff members and
administration. Adjustments are made to the curriculum delivery if progress is not being noted.

                                                                                  RtI Implementation
Describe the data source(s) and the data management system(s) used to summarize data at each tier for reading, mathematics, science, writing, and behavior.
The ESE Specialist will be maintaining the RtI portion of the school's database that identifies students and interventions, by tiers,that will assist in making academic/curriculum
decisions for students, teachers and the school. Teachers regularly utilize Virtual Counselor and BEEP to retrieve data and correlate lessons to subject area concerns. By utilizing mini-
assessments, BAT 1 & 2, FCAT preparation activities, end of book/chapter tests, Accelerated Reader and various reading assessment data, the RtI Team will continue to monitor
student achievement and progress. Individual student data is maintained by the classroom teacher. Progress is monitored by grade level teachers in reading, 4th grade team leader in
writing, 5th grade team leader in science, Assistant Principal in math and ESE Specialist monitors students with disabilities (SWD) progress as well as behavioral indicators.
Describe the plan to train staff on RtI.
Professional development will be provided during pre-planning days and throughout the year. Our ESE Specialist will train the faculty on the RtI process on August 16, 2011. Updates
and training will occur during monthly faculty meetings (1st Tuesday of each month). The Reading Specialist will identify the correlation between RtI and the new version of the
Struggling Readers Chart.


Literacy Leadership Team (LLT)
                                                                       School-Based Literacy Leadership Team
Identify the school-based Literacy Leadership Team (LLT).
Principal: Pamela Govoni
Asst. Principal: Orinthia Dias
April 2011                                                                                                                                                                       8
Rule 6A-1.099811
Revised April 29, 2011
2011-2012 School Improvement Plan (SIP)-Form SIP-1
Reading Coach: TBA
ESE Specialist: Carolyn Reidy
Media Specialist: Deborah Lacek
Team Leaders: PK through Gr. 5: (PK), (K), (1), (2), (3), (4), (5).

All members of the LLT will analyze Lloyd Estates Elementary data and review best practices. Modeling of practices will take place during monthly faculty meetings. Team Leaders
and the Reading Specialist will attend monthly Curriculum Council meetings and share their knowledge with the faculty.

Describe how the school-based LLT functions (e.g., meeting processes and roles/functions).
The LLT will meet once per month to review grade level data, identify concerns, determine interventions, and develop strategies to use with the Lloyd Estates Elementary students.
The Struggling Reader Chart will be used to guide intervention identification.
What will be the major initiatives of the LLT this year?
Monitor the data of Lloyd Estates Elementary and develop interventions to ensure success for our students: maintaining scores of 3+ and realizing learning gains for our Level 1 and 2
students. Analyze data to identify the effectiveness of instruction to meet the needs of students. Implement the comprehensive intervention reading program with fidelity. Train staff
on interpretation of FAIR data and applying data to differentiate instruction.



NCLB Public School Choice

        Notification of School in Need of Improvement (SINI) Status
         Upload a copy of the Notification of SINI Status to Parents in the designated upload link on the “Upload” page.

        Public School Choice with Transportation (CWT) Notification
         Upload a copy of the CWT Notification to Parents in the designated upload link on the “Upload” page.

        Supplemental Educational Services (SES) Notification
         Upload a copy of the SES Notification to Parents in the designated upload link on the “Upload” page.


*Elementary Title I Schools Only: Pre-School Transition
Describe plans for assisting preschool children in transition from early childhood programs to local elementary school programs as applicable.
Place and HeadStart articulation meetings take place annually. New families are encouraged to participate in monthly school tours. Our yearly “Snead-A-Peek” is held on the
Friday prior to the opening of school. Parents and children visit classrooms to ease any fears they may have prior to the opening of school, meet their teachers, and tour the
school facility. Our Kindergarten Round Up is held in the Spring each year with tours of Kindergarten classes following our Orientation Meeting.




April 2011                                                                                                                                                                       9
Rule 6A-1.099811
Revised April 29, 2011
2011-2012 School Improvement Plan (SIP)-Form SIP-1

*Grades 6-12 Only Sec. 1003.413(b) F.S
For schools with Grades 6-12, describe the plan to ensure that teaching reading strategies is the responsibility of every teacher.




*High Schools Only

Note: Required for High School- Sec. 1008.37(4), F.S., Sec. 1003.413(g)(j) F.S.
How does the school incorporate applied and integrated courses to help students see the relationships between subjects and relevance to their future?




How does the school incorporate students’ academic and career planning, as well as promote student course selections, so that students’ course of study is personally meaningful?




Postsecondary Transition

Note: Required for High School- Sec. 1008.37(4), F.S.
Describe strategies for improving student readiness for the public postsecondary level based on annual analysis of the High School Feedback Report.




April 2011                                                                                                                                                                   10
Rule 6A-1.099811
Revised April 29, 2011
                 2011-2012 School Improvement Plan (SIP)-Form SIP-1




                 PART II: EXPECTED IMPROVEMENTS
                 Reading Goals
                 * When using percentages, include the number of students the percentage represents (e.g., 70% (35)).
             READING GOALS                                                                                Problem-Solving Process to Increase Student Achievement
                      Based on the                                         Anticipated Barrier                    Strategy                    Person or Position             Process Used to Determine              Evaluation Tool
of stud        ent achievement data, and reference to “Guiding                                                                            Responsible for Monitoring              Effectiveness of
 n                       s”, identify and define areas in need of                                                                                                                     Strategy
          improvement for the following group:
ts achieving proficiency (FCAT Level 3) in                           1.1.                         1.1.                                 1.1.                            1.1.                                  1.1.
                                                                     Lack of background knowledge Provide rich vocabulary experiences Reading coach and                BAT results                           BAT 1 & 2
                                                                     of the reading process       in the classroom, conduct two        administrators                  Quarterly data chats                  2012 FCAT Reading
oal #       1:                                                                                    evening Literacy Nights for parents,                                 FAIR 3x annually                      Treasures reading assessments
                                                                                                  incorporate word walls for Reading,                                  Running records review                District mini assessments
                             2011 Current Level 2012 Expected
                                                                                                  Math, and Science, 90 minute                                         Student meetings
                             of Performance:* Level of
                                                                                                  literacy block daily, small group                                    Sign-in sheets from literacy nights
T data indicated        that                    Performance:*
                                                                                                  instruction and read alouds daily.
g sco res have               __ % (_) of our    __ % (_) of our
%      growth over           students in grades students in grades
                             3-5 scored Level 3 3-5 will score
of the past 3 years          on the 2011 FCAT Level 3 on the
                             in Reading.        2012 FCAT in
                                                Reading.

                             1.2.                                    1.2.                                1.2.                             1.2.                         1.2.                                  1.2.
                             Meeting the needs of individual         Departmentalized instruction in Administrators, reading coach, ESE   Maintain database of         BAT 1 & 2
                             students and AYP subgroups              grades, 3, 4, and 5.                specialist                       assessment information       2012 FCAT Reading
                                                                     Double dose small group                                              Individual student records   Treasures reading assessments
                                                                     instruction will be provided to                                      review                       District mini assessments
                                                                     lower functioning students.                                          Quarterly data chats
                                                                     Parent workshops for reading,                                        FAIR 3 x annually
                                                                     writing, math, English.                                              Student meetings
                                                                     Tier1: Evidence-based
                                                                     instruction.
                                                                     Tier 2: Intervention identified for
                                                                     students struggling with core
                                                                     instruction. Ongoing progress
                                                                     monitoring
                                                                     Tier 3: Intensive intervention and
                                                                     continued progress monitoring.

                 April 2011                                                                                                                                                                                                        11
                 Rule 6A-1.099811
                 Revised April 29, 2011
            2011-2012 School Improvement Plan (SIP)-Form SIP-1
                                                                   1.3.                              1.3.                                     1.3.                         1.3.                                    1.3.

 n the analysis of student achievement data, and reference to             Anticipated Barrier                       Strategy                      Person or Position              Process Used to Determine               Evaluation Tool
 uestions”, identify and define areas in need of improvement for                                                                              Responsible for Monitoring               Effectiveness of
                 the following group:                                                                                                                                                      Strategy
 ts achieving above proficiency                                    2.1.                              2.1.                                   2.1.                           2.1.                                    2.1.
                                                                   Students maintaining, not         Teachers will utilize 7-8-9 strategies Administrators, Reading        Data chats with teachers and students   BAT 1 & 2
 vels 4 and 5) in reading                                          improving, their higher level     with students.                         Coach, ESE Specialist          Monitoring data in data binders,        Benchmark mini-assessments
oal #2:                                                            achievement scores                Differentiated instruction training                                   assessments                             2012 FCAT results
                                                                                                     will be offered to all teachers.                                      Classroom walk-through
                          2011 Current Level 2012 Expected
                          of Performance:* Level of
 ndicated that                               Performance:*
oring Levels 4 & 5 __ % (_) of our At least __ % (_)
  T are sustaining, students in grades of our students in
                                                   3-5 will
 roving. Our focus 3-55scored Level 4 gradesLevel 4 or 5
                      or on the 2011 score
meet the needs of our FCAT in Reading. on the 2012 FCAT
orming students                            in Reading.
 ferentiated          2.2.                                  2.2.                                     2.2.                                 2.2.                         2.2.                                        2.2.
 and project-based Challenging the higher achieving         Project based learning                   Administrators                       Data chats with teachers and BAT 1 & 2
                      students with activities to develop   Differentiating instruction to           Reading Coach                        students                     Benchmark mini-assessments
  ivities.            problem-solving strategies            provide academic challenges to           ESE Specialist                       Monitoring data in data      2012 FCAT results
                          2.1.                                     high performing students          Team leaderrs                        binders, assessments
                          Students maintaining, not improving,                                                                            Classroom walk-through
                          their higher level achievement scores                                                                           Use of school-wide
                                                                                                                                          assessment database to
                                                                                                                                          monitor students’ progress
                                                                   2.1.                                2.1.                               2.1.                         2.1.                                        2.3
                                                                   Teachers will utilize 7-8-9         Administrators, Reading Coach, ESE Data chats with teachers and BAT 1 & 2
                                                                   strategies with students.           Specialist                         students                     Benchmark mini-assessments
                                                                   Differentiated instruction training                                    Monitoring data in data      2012 FCAT results
                                                                   will be offered to all teachers.                                       binders, assessments
                                                                                                                                          Classroom walk-through


 n the analysis of student achievement data, and reference to             Anticipated Barrier                       Strategy                      Person or Position              Process Used to Determine               Evaluation Tool
 uestions”, identify and define areas in need of improvement for                                                                              Responsible for Monitoring               Effectiveness of
                 the following group:                                                                                                                                                      Strategy
 tage of students making Learning Gains in                         3.1.                              3.1.                                     3.1.                         3.1.                                    3.1.
                                                                   Differentiated instruction must   Reading coach will model and/or           Administrators              Classroom walk-throughs                 BAT 1 & 2
                                                                   be implemented in grades K-5      work with individual teachers on          Reading coach               Modeling and guidance by reading        FAIR
oal #3:                                                                                              strategies for differentiating            Team leaders                coach.                                  Benchmark mini-assessments
                                                                                                     instruction.                              Classroom teachers          Participation in training               2012 FCAT results
                          2011 Current Level 2012 Expected
                                                                                                     Literacy centers will be utilized in      LLT                         School-wide assessment database
                          of Performance:* Level of
                                                                                                     all classrooms.
T data indicated that                        Performance:*
                                                                                                     FAIR Search Tool will be used for
age of students       __ % (_) of our    __ % (_) of our                                             materials for literacy centers and for
rning gains in        students in grades students in grades                                          differentiated instruction.
                          3-5 achieved        3-5 will achieve                                       Teachers will be trained on

            April 2011                                                                                                                                                                                                                  12
            Rule 6A-1.099811
            Revised April 29, 2011
           2011-2012 School Improvement Plan (SIP)-Form SIP-1
reased by ___%           learning gains on learning gains on                                       differentiating instruction.
                         the 2011 FCAT in the 2011 FCAT in                                         Administrators will use classroom
st 3 years.
                         Reading.          Reading.                                                walk-throughs to ensure
                                                                                                   differentiated instruction is taking
                                                                                                   place.
                                                                                                   LLT will continue process of
                                                                                                   “unwrapping the standards” and
                                                                                                   share instructional ideas with staff
                                                                                                   during faculty meetings.
                         3.2.                                    3.2.                              3.2.                                   3.2.                           3.2.                                3.2.
                         Students/parents need to participate in Students will be encouraged to Administrators                            AR Report data                 BAT 1 & 2
                         reading outside of school.              read each evening for 20 minutes Reading Coach                           Circulation report of AR       FAIR
                                                                 All grade levels K-5 will         Team Leaders                           books in media center          Benchmark mini-assessments
                                                                 participate in Accelerated Reader Classroom Teachers                     Increased number of AR         2012 FCAT results
                                                                 (AR), take assessments, and       Media Specialist                       participants and books read.
                                                                 receive incentives for
                                                                 participation.
                                                                 The AR Stars bulletin board will
                                                                 acknowledge achievement by
                                                                 students.

                                                                  3.3.                               3.3.                                 3.3.                           3..3.                               3.3.

n the analysis of student achievement data, and reference to             Anticipated Barrier                      Strategy                    Person or Position                 Process Used to Determine          Evaluation Tool
uestions”, identify and define areas in need of improvement for                                                                           Responsible for Monitoring                  Effectiveness of
                the following group:                                                                                                                                                      Strategy
tage of students in Lowest 25% making learning 4.1.                            4.1.                                  4.1.                                                4.1.                                4.1.
                                               Meeting the needs of individual Double dose struggling readers with Administrators                                        Running records                     BAT 1 & 2
ading                                          students and AYP subgroups      triple dose given to ESE and retained Reading Coach                                       STAR reports                        FAIR
oal #4:                                                                        students.                             ESE Specialist                                      AR reports                          Benchmark mini-assessments
                                                                                                     Literacy centers will be utilized in Team Leaders                   FAIR reports                        2012 FCAT results
                         2011 Current Level 2012 Expected
                                                                                                     all classrooms.                                                     Attendance records for FCAT camps
                         of Performance:* Level of
                                                                                                     FAIR Search Tool will be used for                                   and SES
FCAT data                                   Performance:*
                                                                                                     materials for literacy centers and for                              RtI documentation
 at the percentage of __% (__) of            __% (__) of                                             differentiated instruction.
quartile students     students in the        students in the                                         All grade levels K-5 will participate
                      lowest quartile of     lowest quartile of                                      in Accelerated Reader
rning gains in        Gr. 3-5 made           Gr. 3-5 will make                                       Training for teachers in
 reased by __%        learning gains.        learning gains as                                       differentiating instruction.
_) over the past 3                           evidenced on the                                        Bi-monthly modeling by the reading
                                             2012 Reading                                            coach.
                                             FCAT.



                         4.2.                                     4.2.                               4.2.                                 4.2.                           4.2.                                4.2.
                         Students lacking background              Give STAR assessment to            Administrators                       Running records                BAT 1 & 2
                         knowledge and experiences struggle in    identify reading level.            LLT                                  STAR reports                   FAIR
                         reading.                                 Incorporate United Streaming       Reading Coach                        AR reports                     Benchmark mini-assessments
                                                                  videos into instruction to build   ESE Specialist                       FAIR reports                   2012 FCAT results

           April 2011                                                                                                                                                                                                             13
           Rule 6A-1.099811
           Revised April 29, 2011
           2011-2012 School Improvement Plan (SIP)-Form SIP-1
                                                                  background knowledge.             Team Leaders                         Attendance records for
                                                                  Literacy Leadership Team (LLT)                                         FCAT camps and SES
                                                                  will meet to review student data                                       RtI documentation
                                                                  and identify struggling students.
                                                                  Double dose struggling readers
                                                                  with triple dose given to ESE
                                                                  students and retainees.
                                                                  SES, FCAT camps, before-
                                                                  school camps, and Saturday prep
                                                                  school will provide additional
                                                                  support to struggling readers.
                                                                  Training for teachers in
                                                                  differentiating instruction with
                                                                  frequent modeling by reading
                                                                  coach.
                                                                  Bi-monthly RtI meetings to
                                                                  identify interventions for
                                                                  struggling readers.
                                                                  4.3                               4.3.                                 4.3.                          4.3.                                       4.3.

n the analysis of student achievement data, and reference to             Anticipated Barrier                       Strategy                   Person or Position              Process Used to Determine                  Evaluation Tool
uestions”, identify and define areas in need of improvement for                                                                           Responsible for Monitoring               Effectiveness of
             the applicable subgroup(s):                                                                                                                                               Strategy
nt subgroups not         Reading Goal #5A:                        5A.1.                              5A.1.                                 5A.1.                       5A.1.                                      5A.1.
                                                                  Lack of reading progress           RtI training for teachers during pre- Administrators              Data binders                               BAT 1 & 2
dequate Yearly           Ethnicity                                utilizing RtI Tier 1 interventions planning week                         Psychologist                Data chats                                 FAIR
AYP) in reading          (White, Black, Hispanic, Asian,
                                                                                                                                           ESE Specialist                                                         Benchmark mini-assessments
                         American Indian)
                                                                                                                                           Team Leaders                                                           2012 FCAT results
oal #5A:                                                                                                                                   Classroom teachers

                         2011 Current Level 2012 Expected
                         of Performance:* Level of
indicated that Black                        Performance:*
creased by __% and __% (__) of Black        __% (__) of Black
udents by __% in students met               students and __%
 ficiency from the proficiency in(__)
                     reading; __%
                                            (__) of Hispanic
                                            students will meet
11 FCAT.             of Hispanic            proficiency on the
                         students met       2012 Reading
                         proficiency on the FCAT
                         2011 Reading
                         FCAT
                                                                  5A.2.                             5A.2.                               5A.2                           5A.2.                                      5A.2.
                                                                  Students are lacking basic        Teachers will use FAIR Search Tool, Administrators                 IPT test for incoming ELL students         BAT 1 & 2
                                                                  vocabulary                        personalized vocabulary journals,   ESE Specialist                 Data chats to identify progress/losses     IPT
                                                                                                    Elements of Reading- Vocabulary, Team Leaders                      LLT will monitor data                      CELLA
                                                                                                    and word walls to assist with       Classroom teachers             RtI will provide intervention strategies   2012 FCAT
                                                                                                    vocabulary development                                             for the teacher                            Running records
                                                                                                    Teachers will use Treasures and                                                                               FAIR reports
                                                                                                    triumphs intervention materials to                                                                            Benchmark mini-assessments

           April 2011                                                                                                                                                                                                                  14
           Rule 6A-1.099811
           Revised April 29, 2011
           2011-2012 School Improvement Plan (SIP)-Form SIP-1
                                                                                                assist struggling readers.
                                                                                                Review of CELLA reports

                                                                  5A.3.                         5A.3.                                   5A.3.                     5A.3.                                      5A.3.
                                                                  Students are lacking basic    Teachers will differentiate             Administrators            Data chats to identify progress/losses     BAT 1 & 2
                                                                  reading skills                instruction to meet the needs of all    ESE Specialist            LLT will monitor data                      2012 FCAT
                                                                                                students.                               Team Leaders              RtI will provide intervention strategies   Running records
                                                                                                SES, FCAT camps, before and after       Classroom teachers        for the teacher                            FAIR reports
                                                                                                school camps will be encouraged.                                                                             Benchmark mini-assessments
                                                                                                Reading will be departmentalized in
                                                                                                Gr. 3-5.
                                                                                                Groups will be established to assist
                                                                                                students.
                                                                                                Teachers will use Treasures and
                                                                                                triumphs intervention materials to
                                                                                                assist struggling readers.
                                                                                                Teachers will use FAIR Search Tool
                                                                                                to locate appropriate intervention
                                                                                                materials for small group instruction
                                                                                                and centers.
n the analysis of student achievement data, and reference to              Anticipated Barrier             Anticipated Barrier                    Strategy            Person or Position Responsible for       Process Used to Determine
uestions”, identify and define areas in need of improvement for                                                                                                                 Monitoring                         Effectiveness of
              the following subgroup:                                                                                                                                                                                  Strategy
nt subgroups not         Reading Goal #5B:                        5B.1.                         5B.1.                                 5B.1.                       5B.1.                                   5B.1.
                                                                  Lack of literacy at home      Teacher assistants will provide push- Administrators              IPT test will be given to incoming ELL IPT
dequate Yearly           English Language Learners                                              in assistance to students who are     ESE Specialist              students to determine language level    CELLA
AYP) in reading          (ELL)                                                                  acquiring English language.           Team Leaders                classification.                         BAT 1 & 2
                                                                                                Teachers will use Treasures and       Classroom teachers          Quarterly data chats and bi-monthly RtI Benchmark mini-assessments
oal #5B:                                                                                        Triumphs intervention materials to                                meetings will identify student progress FAIR reports
                                                                                                assist ELL students.                                              or weakness.                            Running Records
                         2011 Current Level 2012 Expected                                       iStation, CAVS materials, In-Step                                 Teacher assistants will provide small 2012 FCAT
                         of Performance:* Level of                                              Readers will be used along with                                   group push-in assistance for A1-B2
indicated that                              Performance:*                                       centers to acclimate ELL students                                 ELL students in grades 3-5.
nguage Learners                                                                                 who are struggling with literacy.                                 Sign-in sheets from literacy nights
                         __% (__) of ELL     __% (__) of ELL
                                                                                                Family Literacy nights will be
eased by __% in          students met        students will meet
                                                                                                conducted at least two times per
                         proficiency in      proficiency in
 ficiency from the       Reading on the      Reading on the
                                                                                                year.
11 FCAT.                                                                                        Parent workshops for reading,
                         2011 FCAT.          2011 FCAT.
                                                                                                writing, math, English.




                                                                  5B.2.                         5B.2.                                   5B.2.                     5B.2.                                      5B.2.
                                                                  5B.3.                         5B.3.                                   5B.3.                      5B.3.                                     5B.3.
n the analysis of student achievement data, and reference to              Anticipated Barrier                 Strategy                       Person or Position          Process Used to Determine                   Evaluation Tool
uestions”, identify and define areas in need of improvement for                                                                         Responsible for Monitoring            Effectiveness of
              the following subgroup:                                                                                                                                             Strategy



           April 2011                                                                                                                                                                                                              15
           Rule 6A-1.099811
           Revised April 29, 2011
           2011-2012 School Improvement Plan (SIP)-Form SIP-1
nt subgroups not         Reading Goal #5C:                        5C.1.                             5C.1.                                  5C.1.                        5C.1.                                   5C.1.
                                                                  Sharing of data and information   The ESE teacher will participate in    Administrators               Administrator will meet with ESE        BAT 1 & 2 results
dequate Yearly           Students with Disabilities               between classroom teacher and     data chats with teachers of students   Reading Coach                teacher on monthly basis to review      FAIR results
AYP) in reading          (SWD)                                    ESE teacher                       with disabilities.                     ESE Specialist               progress and analyze data.              Benchmark mini-assessments
                                                                                                    The ESE Specialist and VE teacher      Classroom Teachers           BAT 1 & 2 results will be reviewed      2012 FCAT
oal #5C:                                                                                            will train the faculty on effective                                 along with mini-assessment and DAR      DAR
                                                                                                    reading strategies: visualizing,                                    data.
                         2011 Current Level 2012 Expected                                           questioning, summarizing,                                           Classroom walk-throughs
                         of Performance:* Level of                                                  activating prior knowledge.
indicated that                              Performance:*                                           A third dose of reading instruction
 th Disabilities                                                                                    will be provided by the classroom
                         __% (__) of SWD     __% (__) of SWD
                                                                                                    teacher.
 reased by __% in        students met        students will meet
                                                                                                    Reading coach will model effective
                         proficiency in      proficiency in
 ficiency from the       Reading on the      Reading on the
                                                                                                    lesson plan development in
11 FCAT.                                                                                            classrooms.
                         2011 FCAT.          2011 FCAT.
                                                                                                    Data trends will be monitored
                                                                                                    closely by classroom and VE
                                                                                                    teacher.

                                                                  5C.2.                             5C.2.                                  5C.2.                        5C.2.                                   5C.2.

                                                                  5C.3.                             5C.3.                                  5C.3.                        5C.3.                                   5C.3.

n the analysis of student achievement data, and reference to              Anticipated Barrier                     Strategy                     Person or Position               Process Used to Determine               Evaluation Tool
uestions”, identify and define areas in need of improvement for                                                                            Responsible for Monitoring                Effectiveness of
              the following subgroup:                                                                                                                                                    Strategy
nt subgroups not         Reading Goal #5D:          5D.1.                                           5D.1.                                  5D.1.                        5D.1.                                   5D.1.
dequate Yearly           Economically Disadvantaged Lack of parental involvement                    Family Literacy Nights
                                                                                                    McDonald’s Principal’s Challenge
                                                                                                                                           Administrators
                                                                                                                                           Reading Coach
                                                                                                                                                                        Monitoring Accelerated Reading
                                                                                                                                                                        reports
                                                                                                                                                                                                                BAT 1 & 2 results
                                                                                                                                                                                                                Benchmark mini-assessments
AYP) in reading                                                                                     “Give Two” initiative for parental     Team Leaders                 Review of Principal’s Reading           AR reports
                                                                                                    involvement will contribute to         Classroom Teachers           Challenge data                          FAIR reports
oal #5D:                                                                                            parents learning the importance of                                  “Give Two” sign-in sheets               2012 FCAT
                                                                                                    reading                                                             Sign-in sheets from literacy nights
                         2011 Current Level 2012 Expected
                         of Performance:* Level of
ve for Data indicated                       Performance:*
mically               __% (__) of            __% (__) of
 ged Students         Economically           Economically
 y __% in reading Disadvantaged
                      students met
                                             Disadvantaged
                                             students will meet
  from the 2010 to proficiency in            proficiency in
T.                    Reading on the         Reading on the
                         2011 FCAT.          2011 FCAT.

                                                                  5D.2.                             5D.2.                                  5D.2.                        5D.2.                                   5D.2.
                                                                  Many of the economically          Struggling students will have a        Administrators               LLT will review reading data and        BAT 1 & 2 results
                                                                  disadvantaged students do not     minimum of two doses of reading        Reading Coach                determine effectiveness of strategies   Benchmark mini-assessments
                                                                  have a firm foundation in         instruction daily.                     Team leaders                 being used.                             AR reports
                                                                  reading.                          Differentiated lessons will be given   Classroom teachers           Data chats with teachers and students   FAIR reports
                                                                                                    to students K-5 to meet students’                                                                           2012 FCAT

           April 2011                                                                                                                                                                                                                 16
           Rule 6A-1.099811
           Revised April 29, 2011
 2011-2012 School Improvement Plan (SIP)-Form SIP-1
                                                                              needs.
                                                                              Reading Coach will model effective
                                                                              reading strategies.
                                                                              FCAT camps, SES, Saturday school,
                                                                              before-school camps will be offered
                                                                              to economically disadvantaged
                                                                              students and other struggling
                                                                              students to provide foundational
                                                                              skills in reading.
                                            5D.3.                             5D.3.                               5D.3.                        5D.3.                               5D.3.




              Professional Development (PD) aligned with Strategies through Professional Learning Community (PLC) or PD Activity
                                                         Please note that each Strategy does not require a professional development or PLC activity.
    PD Content /Topic                                                                                Target Dates and Schedules
                                          PD Facilitator               PD Participants
    and/or PLC Focus         Grade                                                                     (e.g. , Early Release) and                                            Person or Position Responsible for
                                             and/or          (e.g. , PLC, subject, grade level, or                                       Strategy for Follow-up/Monitoring
                          Level/Subject                                                              Schedules (e.g., frequency of                                                      Monitoring
                                           PLC Leader                   school-wide)
                                                                                                                meetings)
Primary Gr. Literacy                 Troy                                                                                Journal, Portfolio, CWT Visitation,
                        PreK – Gr. 3                      PreK – Grade 3 Teachers                Monthly; 8/2010 – 5/2011                                    Troy Robinson
                                     Robinson                                                                            & Peer Observation
DI for Reading &                     Emmy                                                                                Journal, Portfolio, CWT Visitation,
                        Grades 4 & 5                      Grades 4 & 5                           Monthly: 8/2010 -5/2011                                     Emmy Louvaris
Math Strategies                      Louvaris                                                                            & Peer Observation


 Reading Budget (Insert rows as needed)
 Include only school-based funded activities/materials and exclude district funded activities/materials.
 Evidence-based Program(s)/Materials(s)
 Strategy                                     Description of Resources                                  Funding Source                                        Amount
 Treasures Workbooks & Activity               Student Workbooks & Materials                             School Budget                                         3700.00
 Materials
 RTI For Diverse Learners                     PLC’s, CPST, Grade Level Meetings:                        Title One                                             2600.00
                                              Teacher Discussions, Analysis and Follow
                                              Up
                                                                                                                                                                                                  Subtotal:



 Technology
 Strategy                                     Description of Resources                                  Funding Source                                        Amount

 April 2011                                                                                                                                                                                              17
 Rule 6A-1.099811
 Revised April 29, 2011
 2011-2012 School Improvement Plan (SIP)-Form SIP-1
 Quia License                                           Parent & Teacher survey                                      Title One                                           50.00
 Compass Learning Odyssey                               Substitutes to cover classes for teachers                    Title One                                           1500.00
                                                        attending workshop
 Accelerated Reading Training for                       Substitutes to cover classes for teachers                    Title One                                           300.00
 establishing goals and analyzing data                  attending workshop
                                                                                                                                                                                                             Subtotal:
 Professional Development
 Strategy                                               Description of Resources                                     Funding Source                                      Amount
 IRA Convention                                         Registration Fee                                             Title One                                           100.00
 Teachers attend Treasures Training;                    Substitutes to cover classes for teachers                    Title One                                           1500.00
 Grades 3 – 5                                           attending workshop
 Understanding Poverty                                  Summer Staff Development to Meet the                         Title One                                           $6000.00
                                                        Literacy Needs of our Community
                                                                                                                                                                                                             Subtotal:
 Other
 Strategy                                               Description of Resources                                     Funding Source                                      Amount


                                                                                                                                                                                                             Subtotal:
                                                                                                                                                                                                               Total:
 End of Reading Goals
 Mathematics Goals
 * When using percentages, include the number of students the percentage represents (e.g. 70% (35)).
              MATHEMATICS GOALS                                                                         Problem-Solving Process to Increase Student Achievement
  Based on the analysis of student achievement data, and reference to        Anticipated Barrier                    Strategy                Person or Position       Process Used to Determine        Evaluation Tool
      “Guiding Questions”, identify and define areas in need of                                                                              Responsible for              Effectiveness of
                improvement for the following group:                                                                                           Monitoring                     Strategy
1. Students achieving proficiency (Level 3) in                          1.1.                            1.1.                              1.1.                   1.1.                            1.1.
                                                                        Inadequate comprehension of     1.Train teachers on RtI process, ESE Specialist          Data Chats                      BAT 1 & 2
mathematics                                                             basic math skills and problem   Tier 1, 2 & 3 intervention        Administrators         Data Binders                    2012 Math FCAT results
Mathematics Goal #1:                                                    solving skills.                 strategies and monitoring.                                                               Ongoing progress
                                                                                                        2.RtI meetings will take place on                                                        monitoring
                                   2011 Current      2012 Expected
                                                                                                        a bi-monthly basis to identify                                                           Go-Math assessment
                                   Level of          Level of
                                                                                                        struggling students and                                                                  Compass Math reports
Our 2011 Math FCAT data            Performance:*     Performance:*
                                                                                                        interventions to initiate.                                                               FCAT Explorer
indicates that our math scores have
                                    __% ( ) scored   __% ( ) will                                       3. Go-Math Assessment to
shown an increase of __% in
                                    level 3 on the   score level 3 on                                   identify students strengths and
comparison to the 2010 FCAT
                                    Math 2011        the Math 2012                                      weaknesses

 April 2011                                                                                                                                                                                                         18
 Rule 6A-1.099811
 Revised April 29, 2011
 2011-2012 School Improvement Plan (SIP)-Form SIP-1
Math results.                      FCAT.             FCAT.


                                                                        1.2.                           1.2.                              1.2.                   1.2.                                   1.2.
                                                                        Funding issue:                 Teachers will analyze previous Administrators            BAT 1 & 2 and benchmark mini-          2012 FCAT
                                                                        Lack of a Math Coach to        year's data and pinpoint math     ESE Specialist         assessment results. Data Chats will    BAT 1 & 2
                                                                        provide much-needed            deficiencies.                                            identify students struggling in math   Go-Math Assessments
                                                                        emphasis on basic skills and   2. Math departmentalization, in                          and programs offered. RtI
                                                                        problem-solving skills.        Gr. 3-5, will continue for the                           interventions will be implemented
                                                                                                       2010-2011 school year.                                   and monitored for effectiveness.
                                                                                                       3. RtI meetings will take place
                                                                                                       on a bi-monthly basis to identify
                                                                                                       struggling students and
                                                                                                       interventions to initiate.
                                                                                                       4. Go-Math Assessment to
                                                                                                       identify students strengths and
                                                                                                       weaknesses.
                                                                                                       5.Teachers will attend and
                                                                                                       implement strategies from GO-
                                                                                                       Math training and New
                                                                                                       Generation standards workshop.
                                                                                                       6. District Math personnel will
                                                                                                       conduct follow-up Math training.
                                                                        1.3.                           1.3.                              1.3.                   1.3.                                   1.3.




  Based on the analysis of student achievement data, and reference to          Anticipated Barrier                 Strategy                Person or Position          Process Used to Determine              Evaluation Tool
      “Guiding Questions”, identify and define areas in need of                                                                             Responsible for                 Effectiveness of
                improvement for the following group:                                                                                          Monitoring                        Strategy
2. Students achieving above proficiency                               2.1.                          2.1.                             2.1.                       2.1.                                   2.1.
                                                                      Lack of basic math skills and 1. Teachers will use high-yield Administrators              Classroom Walk-throughs                Math 2012 FCAT, BAT 1
(Levels 4 and 5) in mathematics                                       problem-solving skills.       strategies to enhance Math       ESE Specialist             Data Chats                             &2
Mathematics Goal #2:                                                                                instruction.                                                Data Binder                            GO-Math assessments
                                                                                                    2. Teachers will differentiate                                                                     Compass and FCAT
                                    2011 Current     2012 Expected
                                                                                                    instruction to meet the needs of                                                                   Explorer Results
Our 2010 Math FCAT data             Level of         Level of
                                                                                                    all students.                                                                                      Evidence of student work
indicates that our math scores have Performance:* Performance:*
                                                                                                    3. Math best practices will be
shown an increase of 5% in
                                    __% ( ) of the __% ( ) of the                                   shared at monthly faculty
comparison to the 2009 FCAT
                                    Gr. 3-5 students Gr. 3-5 students                               meetings and at bi-monthly
Math results. Math challenges and
                                    scored level 4-5 will score level                               PLC's.
differentiated instruction for our
                                    proficiency on 4-5 proficiency                                  4. Compass and FCAT Explorer
high achieving math students will
                                    the Math 2011 on the 2012 Math                                  will be utilized in conjunction
insure sustainability.
                                    FCAT.            FCAT.                                          with math instruction to further
                                                                                                    math skills.
                                                                      2.2. Differentiated           2.2. Differentiated instruction, 2.2. Administrators        2.2. Data Chats                        2.2. BAT 1 & 2
                                                                      instruction to meet the needs used in all classrooms, will     ESE Specialist             Progress Monitoring                    2012 Math FCAT results
                                                                      of higher performing math     provide a challenging curriculum Classroom Teachers         Classroom Walk-throughs                Go Math assessments
                                                                      students                      for students                                                                                       Compass and FCAT

 April 2011                                                                                                                                                                                                                 19
 Rule 6A-1.099811
 Revised April 29, 2011
 2011-2012 School Improvement Plan (SIP)-Form SIP-1
                                                                                                       2. Calendar Math and Mr. G's                                                                       Explorer results
                                                                                                       Distance Learning will provide                                                                     Evidence of student work
                                                                                                       additional math opportunities for
                                                                                                       Level 4 - 5 students
                                                                         2.3                           2.3                               2.3                        2.3                                   2.3

 Based on the analysis of student achievement data, and reference to           Anticipated Barrier                  Strategy                   Person or Position           Process Used to Determine            Evaluation Tool
     “Guiding Questions”, identify and define areas in need of                                                                                  Responsible for                  Effectiveness of
               improvement for the following group:                                                                                               Monitoring                         Strategy
3. Percentage of students making learning gains in 3.1. Meeting the needs of all                       3.1. 1. Small groups with          3.1. Administrators       3.1. Data Chats                       3.1. BAT 1 & 2 data
mathematics (excluding 9th grade; learning gains will levels of Math students.                         teachers using differentiated
                                                                                                       math instruction
                                                                                                                                          ESE Specialist
                                                                                                                                          Classroom teacher
                                                                                                                                                                    Progress Monitoring
                                                                                                                                                                    Data binders
                                                                                                                                                                                                          FCAT 2012 Math results
                                                                                                                                                                                                          Pre- and post- tests for Go
not be available for this grade)                                                                       2. Data chats to identify student                                                                  Math
                                                                                                       progress/weaknesses in math.                                                                       SES participation
Mathematics Goal #3:                                                                                   Grouping identified during chats.
2011 Math FCAT data indicates 2011 Current           2012Expected                                      3. Students in the lowest quartile
that the percentage of students   Level of           Level of                                          will attend after school Math
making learning gains in math     Performance:*      Performance:*                                     Camps beginning in October to
increased by __% in comparison to                                                                      improve math skills.
                                  __% ( ) of the     __% ( ) of the
2010 Math FCAT results.                                                                                4. Administrators and ESE
                                  Gr. 3-5 students   Gr. 3-5 students
                                  made learning      will make                                         Specialist will meet with
                                  gains in math on   learning gains in                                 students in grades 3-5 to review
                                  the 2011 Math      math on the 2012                                  progress and set goals for the
                                  FCAT.              Math FCAT.                                        2012 FCAT.


                                                                         3.2. Lack of basic math skills 3.2. 1. Teacher training, during 3.2. Administrators        3.2. Data Chats                       3.2. BAT 1 & 2 data
                                                                         and problem-solving skills. pre-planning week, on Tier 1, 2 ESE Specialist                 Progress Monitoring                   2011 Math FCAT results
                                                                                                        & 3 interventions when needed.                              Data binders                          Go Math assessment data
                                                                                                        2. Calendar Math and Mountain                                                                     Compass Math and FCAT
                                                                                                        Math will continue to be an                                                                       Explorer
                                                                                                        integral part of math instruction
                                                                                                        and problem solving.
                                                                                                        3. RtI meetings will take place
                                                                                                        on bi-monthly basis to identify
                                                                                                        struggling students and
                                                                                                        interventions to initiate.
                                                                         3.3.                           3.3.                              3.3.                      3..3.                                 3.3.

 Based on the analysis of student achievement data, and reference to           Anticipated Barrier                  Strategy                   Person or Position           Process Used to Determine            Evaluation Tool
     “Guiding Questions”, identify and define areas in need of                                                                                  Responsible for                  Effectiveness of
               improvement for the following group:                                                                                               Monitoring                         Strategy
4. Percentage of students in Lowest 25% making                           4.1.                           4.1.                               4.1.                     4.1.                                  4.1.
                                                                         Lack of progress utilizing RtI 1. Teachers will be trained in the ESE Specialist           Bi-quarterly data chats for           BAT 1 & 2 results
learning gains in mathematics                                            Tier 1 interventions           RtI process and interventions . CPST Team                   individual and grade level teachers   FCAT Math assessment
Mathematics Goal #4:                                                                                    2. Monitoring intervention         RtI Team                 to review Go Math Assessments,        data
                                                                                                        progress                           Administrators           Calendar Math Assessments             RtI monitoring data
                                  2011 Current       2012 Expected
                                                                                                        3. Move to Tier 2 or 3 if progress                          RtI data monitoring
2010 Math FCAT data indicates an Level of            Level of
                                                                                                        is not being realized
increase of 16% in the lowest 25% Performance:*      Performance:*

 April 2011                                                                                                                                                                                                                     20
 Rule 6A-1.099811
 Revised April 29, 2011
 2011-2012 School Improvement Plan (SIP)-Form SIP-1
making learning gains in math in    __% ( ) of the __% ( ) of the
comparison to the 2009 Math         lowest 25% made lowest 25% will
FCAT.                               learning gains on make learning
                                    the 2011 Math gains on the 2012
                                    FCAT.             Math FCAT.
                                                                        4.2.                          4.2.                               4.2.                   4.2.                                  4.2.
                                                                        Students lacking basic math   1. All math students in the        Administrators         Bi-quarterly data chats for           Go Math Assessments,
                                                                        skills.                       lowest quartile will receive a     ESE Specialist         individual and grade level teachers   BAT, Calendar Math
                                                                                                      double dose of math, daily.                               to review Go Math Assessments,        Assessments
                                                                                                      2.Departmentalized math                                   Calendar Math Assessments.            BAT 1 & 2
                                                                                                      instruction for students in Gr. 3-                        Classroom Walk-throughs               FCAT Math assessment
                                                                                                      5.                                                                                              results
                                                                                                      3. Students in the lowest quartile                                                              Compass and FCAT
                                                                                                      will attend Math Camps before                                                                   Explorer results
                                                                                                      school and after school
                                                                                                      beginning in October.
                                                                                                      4. Math Word Walls will be
                                                                                                      utilized to increase and
                                                                                                      encourage the use of math
                                                                                                      vocabulary.
                                                                                                      5. By using diagnostic math
                                                                                                      assessments (Key-Math, G-Made
                                                                                                      and GO-Math placement)
                                                                                                      students strengths and
                                                                                                      weaknesses will be identified.
                                                                                                      6. FCAT camps and before
                                                                                                      school camps will be offered to
                                                                                                      struggling math students
                                                                                                      utilizing Compass math.
                                                                        4.3.                          4.3.                               4.3.                   4.3.                                  4.3.

  Based on the analysis of student achievement data, and reference to          Anticipated Barrier                Strategy                 Person or Position          Process Used to Determine             Evaluation Tool
      “Guiding Questions”, identify and define areas in need of                                                                             Responsible for                 Effectiveness of
             improvement for the applicable subgroup(s):                                                                                      Monitoring                        Strategy
5A. Student subgroups               Mathematics Goal #5A:               5A.1.                         5A.1.                            5A.1.                    5A.1.                                 5A.1.
                                                                        Utilizing the new, Next       1. Go Math Trainings, for all    Administrators           Classroom Walk-throughs               Walk-throughs
not making Adequate                 Ethnicity                           Generation Math standards     grade levels, during the pre-    ESE Specialist           Lesson Plan review                    Lesson Plan review
Yearly Progress (AYP) in            (White, Black, Hispanic, Asian,
                                                                                                      planning week of the 2011-2012 Team Leaders               Objectives                            Objectives Go Math
                                    American Indian)
mathematics                                                                                           school year                      PLC facilitators                                               Assessments BAT 1 & 2
                                                                                                      2. Administrator                 Trained Go Math                                                Data
Mathematics Goal #5A:                                                                                 will review implementation of participants                                                      2012 Math FCAT
Math FCAT data indicates that       2011 Current     2012 Expected                                    new math series based on the
black students increased in         Level of         Level of                                         Next Generation Standards
proficiency by 3% and Hispanic      Performance:*    Performance:*                                    3. PLC's will be focused on Math
students increased in proficiency                                                                     vocabulary, Math Word Walls
                                    __% ( ) of the   __% ( ) of the
by __% from the 2010 to                                                                               and introducing the Next
                                    black students   black students
2012Math FCAT                                                                                         Generation Standards
                                    and __% ( ) of   and __% ( ) of
                                    the hispanic     the hispanic
                                    students met     students will
                                    proficiency on   meet proficiency

 April 2011                                                                                                                                                                                                                21
 Rule 6A-1.099811
 Revised April 29, 2011
 2011-2012 School Improvement Plan (SIP)-Form SIP-1
                                   the 2011 Math       on the 2012 Math
                                   FCAT.               FCAT.

                                                                           5A.2.                          5A.2.                               5A.2.                   5A.2.                           5A.2.
                                                                           5A.3.                          5A.3.                               5A.3.                   5A.3.                           5A.3.
 Based on the analysis of student achievement data, and reference to            Anticipated Barrier                    Strategy                  Person or Position       Process Used to Determine           Evaluation Tool
     “Guiding Questions”, identify and define areas in need of                                                                                    Responsible for              Effectiveness of
             improvement for the following subgroup:                                                                                                Monitoring                     Strategy
5B. Student subgroups    Mathematics Goal #5B:                             5B.1.                          5B.1.                               5B.1.                   5B.1.                           5B.1.
                                                                           Lack of mathematics            1. Teachers in K-5 will             Administrators          Lesson Plans and CWT (weekly)   BAT 1 & 2
not making Adequate      English Language                                  vocabulary                     implement Content Area              ESE Specialist          Data Chats(quarterly)           2012 Math FCAT
Yearly Progress (AYP) in Learners (ELL)                                                                   Vocabulary System (CAVS).           ESOL Liaison                                            GO-Math assessments
mathematics                                                                                               2. Math word walls to provide
                                                                                                          additional math vocabulary for
Mathematics Goal #5B:                                                                                     the students
FCAT data indicates that English   2011 Current        2012 Expected                                      3. Radius Audio Learning
Language Learners students         Level of            Level of                                           System (RALS) will be utilized
increased in proficiency by __%    Performance:*       Performance:*                                      to aid in vocabulary acquisition.
from the 2010 to 2011 Math
                                   __% ( ) of the      __% ( ) of the
FCAT.
                                   English             English
                                   Language            Language
                                   Learners scores     Learners will
                                   at or above grade   score at or above
                                   level on the 2011   grade level on
                                   Math FCAT.          the 2012 Math
                                                       FCAT.
                                                                           5B.2.                          5B.2.                              5B.2.                    5B.2.                           5B.2.
                                                                           English Language Learners      Small group lessons to develop Administrators               Administrators                  BAT 1 & 2
                                                                           learning a new language in     skills                             ESOL contact             ESOL contact                    2012 Math FCAT results
                                                                           conjunction with grade-level   2. Using the ESOL matrix to                                                                 Go Math assessment data
                                                                           academics.                     meet the needs of ELL students
                                                                                                          3. Teacher assistants will provide
                                                                                                          small group and individual
                                                                                                          activities to accelerate
                                                                                                          vocabulary acquisition
                                                                           5B.3                           5B.3.                              5B.3.                    5B.3.                           5B.3.


 Based on the analysis of student achievement data, and reference to              Anticipated Barrier                  Strategy                  Person or Position       Process Used to Determine           Evaluation Tool
     “Guiding Questions”, identify and define areas in need of                                                                                    Responsible for              Effectiveness of
             improvement for the following subgroup:                                                                                                Monitoring                     Strategy
5C. Student subgroups Mathematics Goal #5C: 5C.1.                                 5C.1.                                                       5C.1.                   5C.1.                         5C.1.
                                                    Students do not have concrete 1. Identified SWD students will                             Administrators          Lesson Plans and CWT and CPST BAT 1 & 2
not making Adequate      Students with Disabilities understanding of concepts. participate in the Moving with                                 ESE Specialist                                        2012 Math FCAT
Yearly Progress (AYP) in (SWD)                                                    Math program                                                VE Teacher                                            Go Math placement and
mathematics                                                                       2. Teachers in grades K-5 will                                                                                    chapter tests
                                                                                                          initiate "hands on" instruction,                                                          G-Made
Mathematics Goal #5C:

 April 2011                                                                                                                                                                                                                 22
 Rule 6A-1.099811
 Revised April 29, 2011
 2011-2012 School Improvement Plan (SIP)-Form SIP-1
FCAT data indicates that students 2011 Current      2012 Expected                                     with manipulatives, to introduce
with disabilities decreased in    Level of          Level of                                          new concepts
proficiency by __% from the 2010 Performance:* Performance:*                                          3. Math Word Walls to explain
to 2011 Math FCAT.                                                                                    math concepts and usage of
                                  __% ( ) students __% ( ) students
                                                                                                      terminology
                                  with disabilities with disabilities
                                  met proficiency will meet
                                  on the 2010 Math proficiency on
                                  FCAT.             the 2011 Math
                                                    FCAT.




                                                                        5C.2.                         5C.2.                               5C.2.                   5C.2.                                5C.2.
                                                                        Students with varying         1. Small group instruction          Administrators          Lesson plans                         BAT 1 & 2 data
                                                                        exceptionalities in math      2. RtI Tier 1 intervention          ESE Specialist          Data Chat                            2012 Math FCAT results
                                                                        demonstrate a weakness in     strategies                          ESE teacher             Data binder                          Go Math assessment
                                                                        number sense.                 3. Use of manipulatives to assist                           Progress monitoring                  results
                                                                                                      with basic skills acquisition                                                                    G-Made
                                                                                                      4. Double dose of math
                                                                                                      instruction, daily
                                                                        5C.3.                         5C.3.                               5C.3.                   5C.3.                                5C.3.


  Based on the analysis of student achievement data, and reference to           Anticipated Barrier               Strategy                   Person or Position       Process Used to Determine                Evaluation Tool
      “Guiding Questions”, identify and define areas in need of                                                                               Responsible for              Effectiveness of
              improvement for the following subgroup:                                                                                           Monitoring                     Strategy
5D. Student subgroups Mathematics Goal #5D:                             5D.1.                         5D.1.                            5D.1.                      5D.1.                                5D.1.
                                                                        Lack of basic math skills     1. Double dose math instruction, Administrators             Data Chat                            BAT 1 & 2
not making Adequate      Economically                                                                 daily                                                       Data binder info.                    results
Yearly Progress (AYP) in Disadvantaged                                                                2. Before and after school camps                            Progress monitoring                  FCAT 2012 Math results
mathematics                                                                                           3. Compass Learning Odyssey                                                                      Go Math assessments
                                                                                                      (Math)
Mathematics Goal #5D:                                                                                 4. Math incentives
FCAT data indicates that            2011 Current     2012 Expected                                    5. Math vocabulary word wall
Economically Disadvantaged          Level of         Level of
students decreased in proficiency   Performance:*    Performance:*
by __% from the 2010 to 20101
                                    __% ( )          __% ( )
Math FCAT.
                                    Economically     Economically
                                    Disadvantaged    Disadvantaged
                                    students met     will meet
                                    proficiency on   proficiency on
                                    the 2011 Math    the 2012 Math
                                    FCAT.            FCAT.
                                                                        5D.2.                        5D.2.                              5D.2.                     5D.2.                                5D.2.
                                                                        Lack of parental involvement 1. Math Nights for parents to      Administrators            Guidance Counselor Conference        Sign-in sheets from Math
                                                                                                     provide Math strategies, tips, and                           Forms                                Nights
                                                                                                     activities to use at home with     Guidance Counselor        Sign-in sheets at parent trainings   Progress monitoring
                                                                                                     children.                                                    Use of agenda to enhance
                                                                                                     2. Conferences with teachers to                              communication between home and

 April 2011                                                                                                                                                                                                                  23
 Rule 6A-1.099811
 Revised April 29, 2011
 2011-2012 School Improvement Plan (SIP)-Form SIP-1
                                                                                            pinpoint strengths and/or                                  school
                                                                                            weaknesses.
                                                              5D.3.                         5D.3.                            5D.3.                     5D.3.                            5D.3.




              Professional Development (PD) aligned with Strategies through Professional Learning Community (PLC) or PD Activity
                                                           Please note that each Strategy does not require a professional development or PLC activity.
    PD Content /Topic                                                                                   Target Dates and Schedules
                                            PD Facilitator               PD Participants
    and/or PLC Focus         Grade                                                                       (e.g. , Early Release) and                                             Person or Position Responsible for
                                               and/or          (e.g. , PLC, subject, grade level, or                                       Strategy for Follow-up/Monitoring
                          Level/Subject                                                                Schedules (e.g., frequency of                                                       Monitoring
                                             PLC Leader                   school-wide)
                                                                                                                  meetings)
Go Math                                   District Math
                                                                                                                                     Lesson Plans reviews, Team       Administration
                        All               Department    K-5                                        Various summer dates
                                                                                                                                     Meetings, Classroom walkthroughs Team Leader
                                          Lead Teachers
New Generation Math                                                                                                                  Lesson Plan reviews, Team                 Administration
                    All                   Assistant         k-5                                    TBA
Standards                                                                                                                            Meetings, Classroom walkthroughs          Team Leaders
Differentiated                                                                                                                       Classroom walkthroughs, Lesson            Administration
                    K-5                   HRD               K-5                                    TBA
Instruction                                                                                                                          Plans, PLC's                              Team Leaders

 Mathematics Budget (Insert rows as needed)
 Include only school-based funded activities/materials and exclude district funded activities /materials.
 Evidence-based Program(s)/Materials(s)
 Strategy                                       Description of Resources                                  Funding Source                                        Amount
 Go Math Assessments                            Student math assessment to monitor                        monitor progress Instructional materials              $1,000.00
                                                progress

                                                                                                                                                                                         Subtotal: $1,000.00
 Technology
 Strategy                                       Description of Resources                                  Funding Source                                        Amount
 STAR Math                                      Student math assessment                                   Accountability                                        $1,000.00

                                                                                                                                                                                         Subtotal: $1,000.00
 Professional Development
 Strategy                                       Description of Resources                                  Funding Source                                        Amount
 SBBC Math training workshops                   Substitutes provided while teachers                       Title 1                                               $2,800.00
                                                participate in ongoing SBBC professional
                                                development and Summer IFC planning.
 April 2011                                                                                                                                                                                                  24
 Rule 6A-1.099811
 Revised April 29, 2011
 2011-2012 School Improvement Plan (SIP)-Form SIP-1
 Workshop on Next Generation Standards                  Substitutes provided for teacher attending              Title 1                                             $1,000.00
                                                        workshop
                                                                                                                                                                                           Subtotal: $3,800.00
 Other
 Strategy                                               Description of Resources                                Funding Source                                      Amount
 No Data                                                No Data                                                 No Data                                             No Data
                                                                                                                                                                                                Subtotal: $0.00
                                                                                                                                                                                                  Total: $5,800
 End of Mathematics Goals




 Science Goals
 * When using percentages, include the number of students the percentage represents next to the percentage (e.g. 70% (35)).
                    SCIENCE GOALS                                                                  Problem-Solving Process to Increase Student Achievement
  Based on the analysis of student achievement data, and reference to        Anticipated Barrier               Strategy                Person or Position      Process Used to Determine        Evaluation Tool
      “Guiding Questions”, identify and define areas in need of                                                                         Responsible for             Effectiveness of
                improvement for the following group:                                                                                      Monitoring                    Strategy
1. Students achieving proficiency (FCAT Level 3) in 1.1.                                           1.1.                              1.1.                   1.1.                           1.1.
                                                    Full amount of time being                      1. Departmentalization model      Administrators         Classroom Walk-throughs        Strand assessment data
science                                             used by teachers to teach                      will be used in Grades 3-5        Team Leaders           Science Lab usage
Science Goal #1:                                                        Science concepts.          insuring Science is taught daily.
                                                                                                   2. Delta Science kits being used
                                    2011 Current     2012 Expected
                                                                                                   with Science text.
The Science proficiency rate will   Level of         Level of
                                                                                                   3. Science Lab, with lab
improve by __ percentage points     Performance:*    Performance:*


 April 2011                                                                                                                                                                                                    25
 Rule 6A-1.099811
 Revised April 29, 2011
 2011-2012 School Improvement Plan (SIP)-Form SIP-1
on the 2012 Science FCAT.            __% ( ) of the     __% ( ) of the                                   materials, established for
                                     Grade 5 students   Grade 5 students                                 students in Grades 3-5.
                                     achieved           will achieve                                     4. Teachers will follow the
                                     proficiency on     proficiency on                                   Science Instructional Calendar
                                     the 2011 Science   the Science 2012                                 (BEEP).
                                     FCAT.              FCAT.                                            5. Science Camp, for 5th grade
                                                                                                         students, will be available 2
                                                                                                         afternoons a week.

                                                                           1.2.                        1.2.                                1.2.                   1.2.                               1.2.
                                                                            Lack of Science vocabulary 1.Use of FCAT Explorer,             Administrators         Data Chats                         FCAT Explorer data
                                                                                                       National Geographic and             Team Leaders           Departmentalization meetings       2012 Science FCAT results
                                                                                                       supplemental materials to expose                           PLC's                              Student work using
                                                                                                       students to a vareity of scientific                                                           Science vocabulary
                                                                                                       terms and vocabulary
                                                                                                       2. Science vocabulary becomes
                                                                                                       part of the reading Word Wall
                                                                                                       3. Utilize BEEP lessons to
                                                                                                       enhance science vocabulary and
                                                                                                       understanding of terms
                                                                           1.3.                        1.3.                                1.3.                   1.3.                               1.3.


  Based on the analysis of student achievement data, and reference to           Anticipated Barrier                  Strategy                Person or Position          Process Used to Determine          Evaluation Tool
      “Guiding Questions”, identify and define areas in need of                                                                               Responsible for                 Effectiveness of
                improvement for the following group:                                                                                            Monitoring                        Strategy
2. Students achieving above proficiency                                    2.1.                          2.1.                            2.1.                     2.1.                               2.1.
                                                                           Lack of prior knowledge of    1. Teachers will use science    Team Leaders             Data Chats                         2012 Science FCAT results
(FCAT Levels 4 and 5) in science                                           science                       vocabulary on Word Walls        Administrators           Data binder                        BEEP mini-assessments
Science Goal #2:                                                                                         2. BEEP lessons will be used 1-                          PLC's                              Evidence of student work
                                                                                                         5, K will use hands-on and Big
                                     2011 Current       2012 Expected
                                                                                                         Book lessons
                                     Level of           Level of
Students do not have a scientific    Performance:*      Performance:*
background or knowledge of
                                     __% (__)           __% ( ) students
science when entering our school.
                                     students scored    scored Level 4-5
Departmentalizing in Gr. 3-5 has
                                     Level 4-5 on the   on the 2010
helped with insuring Science is
                                     2011 Science       Science FCAT.
being taught with fidelity, daily.
                                     FCAT.




                                                                           2.2.                           2.2.                            2.2.                    2.2                                2.2.
                                                                           Lack of scientific experiences 1. Science Labs for students in Team Leaders            .Data Chats                        2012 Science FCAT results
                                                                                                          Gr. 3-5                         Administrators          Data binder                        BEEP
                                                                                                          and recording results using                             PLC's                              mini-assessments
                                                                                                          scientific terms                                                                           Evidence of Student work
                                                                                                          2. BEEP lessons will be used 1-
                                                                                                          5, K will use hands-on and Big

 April 2011                                                                                                                                                                                                               26
 Rule 6A-1.099811
 Revised April 29, 2011
 2011-2012 School Improvement Plan (SIP)-Form SIP-1
                                                                                               Book lessons
                                                                 2.3                           2.3                              2.3                      2.3                              2.3

              Professional Development (PD) aligned with Strategies through Professional Learning Community (PLC) or PD Activity
                                                             Please note that each Strategy does not require a professional development or PLC activity.
    PD Content /Topic                                                                                     Target Dates and Schedules
                                            PD Facilitator                 PD Participants
    and/or PLC Focus         Grade                                                                         (e.g. , Early Release) and                                             Person or Position Responsible for
                                               and/or            (e.g. , PLC, subject, grade level, or                                       Strategy for Follow-up/Monitoring
                          Level/Subject                                                                  Schedules (e.g., frequency of                                                       Monitoring
                                             PLC Leader                     school-wide)
                                                                                                                    meetings)
Differentiating                           Staff training                                             ER & approved Planning
                                                                                                                                                                                 Administrators
Instruction             All               ESE Specialist K-5 teachers                                days: ongoing throughout CWT
                                                                                                                                                                                 Team Leaders
                                          PLC facilitator                                            the year in PLC's
Discovery Education                                                                                  ER & approved Planning
                                                                                                                                                                                 Administrators
                        All               Staff, inhouse K-5 teachers                                days: ongoing throughout CWT
                                                                                                                                                                                 Team Leaders
                                                                                                     the year in PLC's.




 Science Budget (Insert rows as needed)
 Include only school-based funded activities/materials and exclude district funded activities/materials.
 Evidence-based Program(s)/Materials(s)
 Strategy                                       Description of Resources                                      Funding Source                                      Amount
 N/A                                                                                                                                                              $0.00

                                                                                                                                                                                                  Subtotal: $0.00
 Technology
 Strategy                                       Description of Resources                                      Funding Source                                      Amount
 Countdown to FCAT Science                      FCAT preparation for struggling Tier 2 - 3                    Title 1                                             $500.00
                                                students

                                                                                                                                                                                                Subtotal: $500.00
 Professional Development
 Strategy                                       Description of Resources                                      Funding Source                                      Amount
 N/A                                                                                                                                                              $0.00



 April 2011                                                                                                                                                                                                    27
 Rule 6A-1.099811
 Revised April 29, 2011
 2011-2012 School Improvement Plan (SIP)-Form SIP-1
                                                                                                                                                                                                     Subtotal: $0.00
 Other
 Strategy                                               Description of Resources                                    Funding Source                                      Amount
 National Geographic periodical                         Student acclimation to science principles                   Media                                               $2,200.00
 Rotary and City of Oakland Park Garden                 Soil, plants and guest speakers; students                   City of OP and Rotary Club, no charge to            $0.00
 Suport                                                 plant and maintain a school garden: Gr. K                   the school
                                                        and 3
                                                                                                                                                                                               Subtotal: $2,200.00
                                                                                                                                                                                                 Total: $2,700.00
 End of Science Goals




 Writing Goals
 * When using percentages, include the number of students the percentage represents next to the percentage (e.g. 70% (35)).
                  WRITING GOALS                                                                       Problem-Solving Process to Increase Student Achievement
 Based on the analysis of student achievement data, and reference to         Anticipated Barrier                   Strategy                Person or Position      Process Used to Determine        Evaluation Tool
     “Guiding Questions”, identify and define areas in need of                                                                              Responsible for             Effectiveness of
               improvement for the following group:                                                                                           Monitoring                    Strategy
1. Students achieving Adequate Yearly Progress                         1.1.                           1.1.                              1.1.                    1.1.                           1.1.
                                                                       6 Traits being taught in all   1. Provide teachers with 6 Traits Administrators          Team Leaders Classroom Walk-   Portfolios of student work
(FCAT Level 4.0 and higher) in writing                                 grade levels, with fidelity.   training to insure knowledge of Team Leaders              throughs                       reviewed quarterly by
Writing Goal #1:                                                                                      the writing process.                                      Monthly Writing Prompts        Team Leaders and
                                                                                                      2. BEEP Instructional Focus                                                              Administrators.
                            2011 Current Level 2012 Expected
                                                                                                      calendar: Writer's Workshop
                            of Performance:*   Level of
                                                                                                      being used by all grade levels.
The percentage of students                     Performance:*
scoring 4+ on the 2010
                            85% (67) of the    90%(69) of the
Writing FCAT increased
                            Grade 4 students   Grade 4 students
from 73% to 85%. 16% of
                            scored 4+ on the   will score 4+ on the
Grade 4 students in the
                            2011 Writing FCAT. 2011 Writing
district met proficiency on
                                               FCAT.
the FCAT Writing Test.
                                                                       1.2. Writing vocabulary is not 1.2.                               1.2.                   1.2.                           1.2.
                                                                       developed.                     1. Writing Centers will be         Administrators         Classroom Walk-throughs        1.Portfolio of student
                                                                                                      utilized to expose students to the Team Leaders           Monthly Writing Prompts        writing samples
                                                                                                      genres of writing.                                                                       2. Writing prompts

 April 2011                                                                                                                                                                                                             28
 Rule 6A-1.099811
 Revised April 29, 2011
 2011-2012 School Improvement Plan (SIP)-Form SIP-1
                                                                                                     2. Word Walls will be                                                                         exchanged and shared
                                                                                                     established to provide support                                                                during PLC's to determine
                                                                                                     for the writing process.                                                                      if 6 Traits of Writing rubric
                                                                                                     3. Writing Camp, 1 time per                                                                   is being used with fidelity.
                                                                                                     week, beginning in Dec. 2010
                                                                                                     4. Lang. Arts activities to
                                                                                                     introduce proper use of
                                                                                                     punctuation, similes, synonyms
                                                                                                     5. Utilize 2010 FLDOE anchor
                                                                                                     papers to model good use of
                                                                                                     vocabulary.
                                                                       1.3.                          1.3.                           1.3.                        1.3.                               1.3.




 Based on the analysis of student achievement data, and reference to           Anticipated Barrier               Strategy                  Person or Position          Process Used to Determine           Evaluation Tool
     “Guiding Questions”, identify and define areas in need of                                                                              Responsible for                 Effectiveness of
               improvement for the following group:                                                                                           Monitoring                        Strategy
2A. Student                 Writing Goal #2A:                          2A.1.                         2A.1.                             2A.1.                    2A.1.                              2A.1.
                                                                       1. Students lacking basic     1. Writers workshop will be       Administrators           Classroom Walkthroughs             1. Portfolios of student
subgroups not               Ethnicity                                  writing skills.               utilized to assist students       Team Leaders             Monthly Writing Prompts            work reviewed quarterly
making Adequate             (White, Black, Hispanic, Asian,
                                                                                                     struggling with writing skills.                                                               by Team Leaders and
                            American Indian)
Yearly Progress                                                                                      2. Writing centers in each                                                                    Administration
(AYP) in writing                                                                                     classroom will reinforce skills
                                                                                                     taught in whole group lessons.
Writing Goal #2A:
The percentage of black     2011 Current Level 2012 Expected
students scoring            of Performance:* Level of
proficiency on the FCAT                          Performance:*
Writing test was __%( )     __%( ) of Black      __%( ) of Black
and the percentage of       students and __%( ) students and __%( )
Hispanic students scoring   of Hispanic students Hispanic students
proficiency was __%( ).     met proficiency on will meet
                            the 2011 Writing     proficiency on the
                            FCAT.                2012 Writing
                                                 FCAT.
                                                                       2A.2.                         2A.2.                             2A.2.                    2A.2.                              2A.2.
                                                                       2A.3.                         2A.3.                             2A.3.                    2A.3.                              2A.3.
 Based on the analysis of student achievement data, and reference to           Anticipated Barrier               Strategy                 Person or Position        Process Used to Determine              Evaluation Tool
     “Guiding Questions”, identify and define areas in need of                                                                             Responsible for               Effectiveness of
             improvement for the following subgroup:                                                                                         Monitoring                      Strategy



 April 2011                                                                                                                                                                                                              29
 Rule 6A-1.099811
 Revised April 29, 2011
 2011-2012 School Improvement Plan (SIP)-Form SIP-1
2B. Student subgroups    Writing Goal #2B:                             2B.1.                          3B.1.                              2B.1.                 2B.1.                             2B.1.
                                                                       1. Writing vocabulary is not   1. Word walls will be established Administration         Classroom Walkthroughs            1. Portfolio of student
not making Adequate      English Language                              developed.                     to provide support for the writing Team Leaders          Monthly Writing prompts           writing samples
Yearly Progress (AYP) in Learners (ELL)                                                               process.                                                                                   2. Writing prompts
writing                                                                                               2. Introduction to the genres by                                                           exchanged and shared
                                                                                                      highlighting specific authors and                                                          during PLC's
Writing Goal #2B:                                                                                     analyzing their work.                                                                      to identify knowledge of 6
                                   2011 Current      2012 Expected                                    2. Activities that provide proper                                                          Traits
                                   Level of          Level of                                         of punctuation, similes and
The percentage of ELL scoring      Performance:*     Performance:*                                    synonyms.
proficiency on the FCAT Writing                                                                       3. Use of 2011 FLDOE anchor
                                __%( ) of ELL        __%( ) of ELL
test __%( )                                                                                           papers.
                                met proficiency      students will
                                on the 2011          meet
                                FCAT Writing         proficiency on
                                test.                the 2011 FCAT
                                                     Writing Test.
                                                                       2B.2.                          2B.2.                             2B.2.                  2B.2.                             2B.2.
                                                                       6 Traits being taught in all   1. Provide teachers with 6 Traits Administrators         Class Walkthroughs                1. Portfolio of student
                                                                       grade levels with fidelity     of Writing training on August     Team Leaders           Monthly Writing Prompts           writing samples
                                                                                                      19, 2011 to ensure knowledge                                                               2. Writing prompts
                                                                                                      how to teach the writing process.                                                          exhanged and shared
                                                                                                      2. BEEP Instructional Focus                                                                during PLC's to identify
                                                                                                      Calendar (IFC); writer's                                                                   knowledge of 6 Traits
                                                                                                      workshop being used by all
                                                                                                      grade levels.
                                                                       2B.3.                          2B.3.                             2B.3.                  2B.3.                             2B.3.

 Based on the analysis of student achievement data, and reference to           Anticipated Barrier                Strategy                Person or Position         Process Used to Determine           Evaluation Tool
     “Guiding Questions”, identify and define areas in need of                                                                             Responsible for                Effectiveness of
             improvement for the following subgroup:                                                                                         Monitoring                       Strategy
2C. Student subgroups Writing Goal #2C:             2C.1.                                             2C.1.                            2C.1.                   2C.1.                             2C.1.
not making Adequate      Students with Disabilities N/A                                               N/A                              N/A                     N/A
Yearly Progress (AYP) in (SWD)
writing
Writing Goal #2C:
                                2011 Current         2012 Expected
                                Level of             Level of
The percentage of 4th grade SWD Performance:*        Performance:*
scoring proficiency on the FCAT
                                The percentage       The percentage
Writing test was __%( ).
                                of 4th grade         of 4th grade
                                SWD scoring          SWD who will
                                proficiency on       meet
                                the FCAT             proficiency on
                                Writing test was     the 2011 FCAT
                                100%(7).             Writing test
                                                     will be
                                                     100%(7).

 April 2011                                                                                                                                                                                                            30
 Rule 6A-1.099811
 Revised April 29, 2011
 2011-2012 School Improvement Plan (SIP)-Form SIP-1
                                                                         2C.2.                             2C.2.                                2C.2.                   2C.2.                                 2C.2.

                                                                         2C.3.                             2C.3.                                2C.3.                   2C.3.                                 2C.3.

 Based on the analysis of student achievement data, and reference to             Anticipated Barrier                    Strategy                   Person or Position       Process Used to Determine                 Evaluation Tool
     “Guiding Questions”, identify and define areas in need of                                                                                      Responsible for              Effectiveness of
             improvement for the following subgroup:                                                                                                  Monitoring                     Strategy
2D. Student subgroups Writing Goal #2D:                                  2D.1.                             2D.1.                                2D.1.                   2D.1.                                 2D.1.
                                                                         1. Students lack an appropriate   1. Writing centers will be           Administration          Classroom Walkthroughs                Monthly writing prompts
not making Adequate      Economically                                    level of vocabulary needed to     utilized to expose students to the   Team Leaders            Monthly writing prompts               Portfolio of student writing
Yearly Progress (AYP) in Disadvantaged                                   produce exemplary writing         genres of writing.                   Reading Specialist      Individualized writing                samples
writing                                                                  pieces.                           2. FLDOE anchor papers will be                               teacher/student writing conferences
                                                                                                           utilized to model good writing
Writing Goal #2D:                                                                                          pieces.
The percentage of 4th grade FRL 2011 Current           2012 Expected                                       3. Word walls will be used to
students scoring proficiency on the Level of           Level of                                            enhance writing vocabulary.
2010 FCAT Writing test was __%( Performance:*          Performance:*
).
                                    The percentage     The percentage
                                    of 4th grade FRL   of 4th grade
                                    students scoring   FRL students
                                    proficiency on     who will meet
                                    the 2011 FCAT      proficiency on
                                    Writing test was   the 2012 FCAT
                                    __%( ).            Writing test
                                                       will be __%( ).



                                                                         2D.2.                             2D.2.                                2D.2.                   2D.2.                                 2D.2.

                                                                         2D.3.                             2D.3.                                2D.3.                   2D.3.                                 2D.3.



                Professional Development (PD) aligned with Strategies through Professional Learning Community (PLC) or PD Activity
                                                                   Please note that each Strategy does not require a professional development or PLC activity.
     PD Content /Topic                                                                                          Target Dates and Schedules
                                                    PD Facilitator               PD Participants
     and/or PLC Focus              Grade                                                                         (e.g. , Early Release) and                                                        Person or Position Responsible for
                                                       and/or          (e.g. , PLC, subject, grade level, or                                       Strategy for Follow-up/Monitoring
                                Level/Subject                                                                  Schedules (e.g., frequency of                                                                  Monitoring
                                                     PLC Leader                    school-wide)
                                                                                                                          meetings)

6 Traits Writing             Gr. 2 teachers,
                                             HRD, Pre-     Gr. 2 teachers, new Gr. 3                                                                                                             Administrators
                             new Gr. 3                                                    TBA                                                           Monthly prompts
                                             planning week teacher and new Gr. 4 teachers                                                                                                        Classroom teachers
                             teacher and
                             new Gr. 4
                             teachers
                             All             Team Leader Classroom teachers               TBA                                                           Team Meeting minutes                     Administrators
Developing Writing                           and classroom                                                                                              PLC's                                    PLC facilitators
 April 2011                                                                                                                                                                                                                         31
 Rule 6A-1.099811
 Revised April 29, 2011
 2011-2012 School Improvement Plan (SIP)-Form SIP-1
strategies at each grade              teachers                                                                       Team Leaders
level




 Writing Budget (Insert rows as needed)
 Include only school-based funded activities/materials and exclude district funded activities/materials.
 Evidence-based Program(s)/Materials(s)
 Strategy                                   Description of Resources                     Funding Source    Amount
 Words I Use When I Write, Primary          Common words to use in the writing           Title 1           $250.00
                                            process

                                                                                                                              Subtotal: $250.00
 Technology
 Strategy                                   Description of Resources                     Funding Source    Amount
 FETC Convention                            Technology convention                        Title 1           $100.00

                                                                                                                              Subtotal: $100.00
 Professional Development
 Strategy                                   Description of Resources                     Funding Source    Amount
 Train-the-Trainer modeling the writing     Experienced teacher models effective         School Budget     $500.00
 process                                    writing techniques and critiques
                                            lessons...substitutes

 April 2011                                                                                                                                32
 Rule 6A-1.099811
 Revised April 29, 2011
 2011-2012 School Improvement Plan (SIP)-Form SIP-1

                                                                                                                                                                                                   Subtotal: $500.00
 Other
 Strategy                                              Description of Resources                                 Funding Source                                        Amount
 No Data                                               No Data                                                  No Data                                               $0.00
                                                                                                                                                                                                      Subtotal: $0.00
                                                                                                                                                                                                       Total: $850.00
 End of Writing Goals




 Attendance Goal(s)
 * When using percentages, include the number of students the percentage represents next to the percentage (e.g. 70% (35)).
             ATTENDANCE GOAL(S)                                                                            Problem-solving Process to Increase Attendance
 Based on the analysis of attendance data, and reference to “Guiding         Anticipated Barrier               Strategy                 Person or Position       Process Used to Determine            Evaluation Tool
   Questions”, identify and define areas in need of improvement:                                                                         Responsible for              Effectiveness of
                                                                                                                                           Monitoring                     Strategy
1. Attendance                                                           1.1.                       1.1.                               1.1.                   1.1.                                1.1.
                                                                        Absences (habitual)        1. Parent notification             IMT                    Decrease of habitual absence rate   Attendance cards
Attendance Goal #1:
                                                                                                   2. Conference with parent          Classroom teacher                                          DWH reports
                          2011 Current          2012 Expected                                      3. Social Worker referral          Social Worker                                              BTIP
                          Attendance Rate:*     Attendance Rate:*                                  4. SBBC Parent Link
Based on the 2011                                                                                  5. Monitor BTIP data to ensure
attendance data, our      The 2011 attendance   The attendance rate
                                                                                                   absences are less than last school
tardies and absences are rate was __%.          for 2012 will improve
                                                                                                   year
within the average range.                       to __%.
                          2011 Current          2012 Expected
                          Number of Students    Number of Students
                          with Excessive        with Excessive
                          Absences              Absences
                           (10 or more)         (10 or more)
                          A total of 119        __ students will have
                          students had          excessive absences in
                          excessive absences    the 2012 school year.

 April 2011                                                                                                                                                                                                         33
 Rule 6A-1.099811
 Revised April 29, 2011
2011-2012 School Improvement Plan (SIP)-Form SIP-1
                       during the 2011
                       school year.
                       2011 Current         2012 Expected
                       Number of            Number of
                       Students with        Students with
                       Excessive Tardies    Excessive Tardies
                       (10 or more)          (10 or more)
                       __ students had      __ students will have
                       excessive tardies in excessive tardies in
                       the 2011 school      the 2012 school year.
                       year.
                                                                    1.2. Tardies (habitual)        1.2.                           1.2.                    1.2.                                   1.2.
                                                                                                   1. Parent notification         IMT                     Decrease of habitual tardies           Attendance cards
                                                                                                   2. Conference with parent      Classroom teacher                                              DWH reports
                                                                                                   3. Social Worker referral      Social Worker                                                  BTIP
                                                                    1.3.                           1.3.                           1.3.                    1.3. Sign-in sheets for meetings       1.3.
                                                                    Parent interest in education   1. Reminder notices in         Administrators          Signature in Agenda book               Attendance at meetings
                                                                                                   Principal's Message in monthly IMT
                                                                                                   newsletter                     Classroom Teacher
                                                                                                   2. Notes in agenda             PTO
                                                                                                   3. PTO and SAC meeting agenda SAC
                                                                                                   item


             Professional Development (PD) aligned with Strategies through Professional Learning Community (PLC) or PD Activity
                                                              Please note that each Strategy does not require a professional development or PLC activity.
   PD Content /Topic                                                                                       Target Dates and Schedules
                                               PD Facilitator               PD Participants
   and/or PLC Focus            Grade                                                                        (e.g. , Early Release) and                                                   Person or Position Responsible for
                                                  and/or          (e.g. , PLC, subject, grade level, or                                       Strategy for Follow-up/Monitoring
                            Level/Subject                                                                 Schedules (e.g., frequency of                                                             Monitoring
                                                PLC Leader                   school-wide)
                                                                                                                     meetings)
Updates workshop                             IMT & Social
                         All                              Instructional staff                            Aug. 22 and ongoing           Data Chats                                   Administrators
                                             Worker
BTIP                                         IMT
                         All                 Assistant    Instructional staff                            Aug. 22 and ongoing           Data Chats                                   Administrators
                                             Principal

Attendance Budget (Insert rows as needed)
Include only school-based funded activities/materials and exclude district funded activities /materials.
Evidence-based Program(s)/Materials(s)
Strategy                                            Description of Resources                                   Funding Source                                      Amount
N/A                                                                                                                                                                $0.00

                                                                                                                                                                                                       Subtotal: $0.00

April 2011                                                                                                                                                                                                            34
Rule 6A-1.099811
Revised April 29, 2011
 2011-2012 School Improvement Plan (SIP)-Form SIP-1
 Technology
 Strategy                                               Description of Resources                                  Funding Source                                        Amount
 N/A

                                                                                                                                                                                                       Subtotal: $0.00
 Professional Development
 Strategy                                               Description of Resources                                  Funding Source                                        Amount
 N/A

                                                                                                                                                                                                       Subtotal: $0.00
 Other
 Strategy                                               Description of Resources                                  Funding Source                                        Amount
 BTIP funding                                           Partial support of IMT (attendance) clerical              School budget                                         $3,000.00
                                                        position
                                                                                                                                                                                                 Subtotal: $3,000.00
                                                                                                                                                                                                   Total: $3,000.00
 End of Attendance Goals



 Suspension Goal(s)
 * When using percentages, include the number of students the percentage represents next to the percentage (e.g. 70% (35)).
               SUSPENSION GOAL(S)                                                                           Problem-solving Process to Decrease Suspension
 Based on the analysis of suspension data, and reference to “Guiding        Anticipated Barrier                  Strategy                  Person or Position       Process Used to Determine         Evaluation Tool
   Questions”, identify and define areas in need of improvement:                                                                            Responsible for              Effectiveness of
                                                                                                                                              Monitoring                     Strategy
1. Suspension                                                            1.1.                         1.1.                              1.1.                    1.1.                             1.1.
                                                                         Lack of parental involvement 1. Parenting workshops offered    Administration          Conference forms                 Attendance at parent
Suspension Goal #1:
                                                                                                      during conferences                Teacher Leaders         Agenda books                     conferences
                             2011 Total Number 2012 Expected                                          2. Teachers use agenda books to   Classroom teacher       Student conference goal sheets
                             of                    Number of                                          enhance home-school
2011 data indicates that 8 In –School              In- School                                         communication
students accumulated a       Suspensions           Suspensions                                        3. More frequent conferences
total of __ days of internal There were __ in      The total number of                                with students and their parents
suspension.                  school suspensions in in school suspension                               4. Grade 3 play, as a family
                             2011.                 rate will decrease to                              event, to increase parental
                                                   __ in 2012.
 April 2011                                                                                                                                                                                                             35
 Rule 6A-1.099811
 Revised April 29, 2011
2011-2012 School Improvement Plan (SIP)-Form SIP-1
                      2011 Total Number 2012 Expected                                          involvement
                      of Students           Number of Students
                      Suspended             Suspended
                      In-School             In -School
                      The total number of in 2012. The
                      students suspended in expected number of
                      school was __in       students suspended in
                      2011.                 school for 2012 will
                                            be __.
                      2011 Number of Out- 2012 Expected
                      of-School             Number of
                      Suspensions           Out-of-School
                                            Suspensions
                      The number of out of The expected number
                      school suspensions of out of school
                      was __ in 2011.       suspensions for 2012
                                            will be __ .
                      2011 Total Number 2012 Expected
                      of Students           Number of Students
                      Suspended             Suspended
                      Out- of- School       Out- of-School
                      The total number of   he expected number
                      students that were    of out of school
                      suspended out of      suspensions for 2012
                      school in 2011 was    will be __.
                      __ .
                                                                    1.2.                       1.2.                             1.2.                      1.2.                              1.2.
                                                                    Loss of classroom          1. Teachers will use CHAMPS      Administration            Behavior charts                   Discipline matrix
                                                                    instructional time         techniques with students         Teacher Leaders           CPST and RtI participation        data
                                                                                               2.Rules/consequences clearly     Classroom teacher         Interventions and monitoring      Successmaker data
                                                                                               explained and posted in room                               Data chats
                                                                                               3. Consistent classroom                                    CWT
                                                                                               management techniques used in                              Observations
                                                                                               classes
                                                                    1.3.                       1.3.                             1.3.                      1.3.                              1.3.




            Professional Development (PD) aligned with Strategies through Professional Learning Community (PLC) or PD Activity
                                                              Please note that each Strategy does not require a professional development or PLC activity.
  PD Content /Topic                                                                                        Target Dates and Schedules
                                               PD Facilitator               PD Participants
  and/or PLC Focus            Grade                                                                         (e.g. , Early Release) and                                              Person or Position Responsible for
                                                  and/or          (e.g. , PLC, subject, grade level, or                                       Strategy for Follow-up/Monitoring
                           Level/Subject                                                                  Schedules (e.g., frequency of                                                        Monitoring
                                                PLC Leader                    school-wide)
                                                                                                                     meetings)
CHAMPS                                                                                                                                 CWT
                         Teachers,                                                                                                                                                 Classroom teacher
                                            HRD                Teachers, various                      To be determined                 Discipline database monitoring
                         various                                                                                                                                                   Administrators
                                                                                                                                       Incentives

April 2011                                                                                                                                                                                                       36
Rule 6A-1.099811
Revised April 29, 2011
2011-2012 School Improvement Plan (SIP)-Form SIP-1
                                                                                                           Use of appropriate interventions
                                                                                                           CHAMPS rubric




Suspension Budget (Insert rows as needed)
Include only school-based funded activities/materials and exclude district funded activities /materials.
Evidence-based Program(s)/Materials(s)
Strategy                                   Description of Resources                      Funding Source                          Amount
N/A                                                                                                                              $0.00

                                                                                                                                              Subtotal: $0.00
Technology
Strategy                                   Description of Resources                      Funding Source                          Amount
N/A

                                                                                                                                              Subtotal: $0.00
Professional Development
Strategy                                   Description of Resources                      Funding Source                          Amount
N/A

                                                                                                                                              Subtotal: $0.00
Other
Strategy                                   Description of Resources                      Funding Source                          Amount
No Data                                    No Data                                       No Data                                 No Data
                                                                                                                                              Subtotal: $0.00
                                                                                                                                                 Total: $0.00
End of Suspension Goals

Dropout Prevention Goal(s)
Note: Required for High School- F.S., Sec. 1003.53

* When using percentages, include the number of students the percentage represents next to the percentage (e.g. 70% (35)).
April 2011                                                                                                                                               37
Rule 6A-1.099811
Revised April 29, 2011
 2011-2012 School Improvement Plan (SIP)-Form SIP-1
      DROPOUT PREVENTION GOAL(S)                                                                               Problem-solving Process to Dropout Prevention
  Based on the analysis of parent involvement data, and reference to            Anticipated Barrier                Strategy                    Person or Position          Process Used to Determine           Evaluation Tool
      “Guiding Questions”, identify and define areas in need of                                                                                 Responsible for                 Effectiveness of
                            improvement:                                                                                                          Monitoring                        Strategy
1. Dropout Prevention                                                    1.1. N/A                      1.1. N/A                         1.1. N/A                    1.1. N/A                            1.1.

Dropout Prevention Goal #1:
*Please refer to the percentage of students who dropped
out during the 2010-2011 school year.

                             2011 Current        2012 Expected
                             Dropout Rate:*      Dropout Rate:*
N/A
                             N/A                 N/A.
                             2011 Current        2012 Expected
                             Graduation Rate:*   Graduation Rate:*
                             N/A                 N/A
                                                                         1.2.                          1.2.                             1.2.                        1.2.                                1.2.
                                                                         1.3.                          1.3.                             1.3.                        1.3.                                1.3.


                Professional Development (PD) aligned with Strategies through Professional Learning Community (PLC) or PD Activity
                                                                     Please note that each Strategy does not require a professional development or PLC activity.
      PD Content /Topic                                                                                           Target Dates and Schedules
                                                    PD Facilitator                 PD Participants
      and/or PLC Focus             Grade                                                                           (e.g. , Early Release) and                                                   Person or Position Responsible for
                                                       and/or            (e.g. , PLC, subject, grade level, or                                       Strategy for Follow-up/Monitoring
                                Level/Subject                                                                    Schedules (e.g., frequency of                                                             Monitoring
                                                     PLC Leader                     school-wide)
                                                                                                                            meetings)
No Data




 Dropout Prevention Budget (Insert rows as needed)
 Include only school-based funded activities/materials and exclude district funded activities /materials.
 Evidence-based Program(s)/Materials(s)
 Strategy                                               Description of Resources                                    Funding Source                                             Amount
 No Data                                                No Data                                                     No Data                                                    $0.00


                                                                                                                                                                                                                Subtotal: $0.00
 Technology

 April 2011                                                                                                                                                                                                                  38
 Rule 6A-1.099811
 Revised April 29, 2011
 2011-2012 School Improvement Plan (SIP)-Form SIP-1
 Strategy                                               Description of Resources                                 Funding Source                                         Amount
 No Data                                                No Data                                                  No Data                                                $0.00

                                                                                                                                                                                                         Subtotal: $0.00
 Professional Development
 Strategy                                               Description of Resources                                 Funding Source                                         Amount
 No Data                                                No Data                                                  No Data                                                $0.00

                                                                                                                                                                                                         Subtotal: $0.00
 Other
 Strategy                                               Description of Resources                                 Funding Source                                         Amount
 No Data                                                No Data                                                  No Data                                                $0.00
                                                                                                                                                                                                         Subtotal: $0.00
                                                                                                                                                                                                           Total: $0.00
 End of Dropout Prevention Goal(s)



 Parent Involvement Goal(s)
 * When using percentages, include the number of students the percentage represents next to the percentage (e.g. 70% (35)).
    PARENT INVOLVEMENT GOAL(S)                                                                              Problem-solving Process to Parent Involvement
  Based on the analysis of parent involvement data, and reference to        Anticipated Barrier                 Strategy                  Person or Position       Process Used to Determine             Evaluation Tool
      “Guiding Questions”, identify and define areas in need of                                                                            Responsible for              Effectiveness of
                            improvement:                                                                                                     Monitoring                     Strategy
1. Parent Involvement                                                  1.1.                         1.1.                               1.1.                    1.1.                                 1.1.
                                                                       Non-attendance due to        Adjust times, monthly, to          Administrators          Survey parents to find the best time Sign-in sheets and
Parent Involvement Goal #1:                                            availability or work hours   accomodate a variety of families   SAC Chairs              to attend meetings.                  attendance Survey
*Please refer to the percentage of parents who                                                      to attend our meetings.            PTO                                                          response cards
                                                                                                                                       Reading Coach
participated in school activities, duplicated or
unduplicated.

                                   2011 Current      2012 Expected
                                   level of Parent   level of Parent
Complete the 2011 current level of Involvement:*     Involvement:*



 April 2011                                                                                                                                                                                                              39
 Rule 6A-1.099811
 Revised April 29, 2011
 2011-2012 School Improvement Plan (SIP)-Form SIP-1
parent involvement and the 2012     See PIP.        See PIP.
expected level of parent
involvement.
                                                                     1.2.                        1.2.                               1.2.                      1.2.                                1.2.
                                                                     Updating family information Send home new information          Administrators            Collect and update information in   Sign-in sheets and
                                                                     for Parent Link calls       cards with report cards            Teachers                  our school database                 increased attendance
                                                                                                 (quarterly)                        IMT to update
                                                                                                                                    information when it is
                                                                                                                                    returned
                                                                     1.3.                        1.3.                               1.3.                      1.3.                                1.3.
                                                                     Non-attendance due to child Provide child care during our      Administrators            Increased attendance, with children Sign-In sheets and
                                                                     care responsibilities       meetings for children ages 2-8.    Reading Coach             receiving planned child care        attendance
                                                                                                                                    SAC Chairs
                                                                                                                                    PTO
                                                                                                                                    Paraprofessional


                Professional Development (PD) aligned with Strategies through Professional Learning Community (PLC) or PD Activity
                                                                  Please note that each Strategy does not require a professional development or PLC activity.
     PD Content /Topic                                                                                         Target Dates and Schedules
                                                   PD Facilitator               PD Participants
     and/or PLC Focus                Grade                                                                      (e.g. , Early Release) and                                               Person or Position Responsible for
                                                      and/or          (e.g. , PLC, subject, grade level, or                                       Strategy for Follow-up/Monitoring
                                  Level/Subject                                                               Schedules (e.g., frequency of                                                         Monitoring
                                                    PLC Leader                   school-wide)
                                                                                                                         meetings)
See PIP                     See PIP               See PIP          See PIP                                See PIP                          See PIP                                     See PIP
See PIP                     See PIP               See PIP          See PIP                                See PIP                          See PIP                                     See PIP


 Parent Involvement Budget

 * Please ensure that items included in the Parental Involvement Policy/Plan (PIP) are outlined in the following budget section.
 Include only school-based funded activities/materials and exclude district funded activities /materials.
 Evidence-based Program(s)/Materials(s)
 Strategy                                              Description of Resources                                  Funding Source                                        Amount
 Agendas                                               Student agendas allowing for open                         Title 1                                               $1,600.00
                                                       communication between school and
                                                       home
 Flyer materials                                       Colored paper for flyers announcing                       Title 1                                               $50.00
                                                       upcoming meetings and newsletters
                                                       for parent information
                                                                                                                                                                                                      Subtotal: $1,650
 Technology

 April 2011                                                                                                                                                                                                              40
 Rule 6A-1.099811
 Revised April 29, 2011
2011-2012 School Improvement Plan (SIP)-Form SIP-1
Strategy                            Description of Resources                Funding Source   Amount
No Data                             No Data                                 No Data          $0.00

                                                                                                          Subtotal: $0.00
Professional Development
Strategy                            Description of Resources                Funding Source   Amount
No Data                             No Data                                 No Data          $0.00

                                                                                                           Subtotal $0.00

Other
Strategy                            Description of Resources                Funding Source   Amount
Child-care for parent meetings      Salary for paraprofessional             Title 1          $100.00
                                    providing child care
Refreshments                        Refreshments for families attending     Title 1          $200.00
                                    parent meetings
"What Your Child Should Know"       Information for parents, a resource     Title 1          $250.00
                                    for growth
Title 1 Parent Seminar Exposition   Seminar to introduce parents to the     Title 1          $105.00
                                    Title 1 program, parent skills and
                                    resources available to them
"Give Two"                          Parents will be encouraged to come      School budget    $50.00
                                    to two meetings per year; give two
                                    hours to volunteer, or help with 2
                                    fund-raising or parent activities:
                                    certificates will be given at a "Give
                                    Two" breakfast
                                                                                                       Subtotal: $705.00
                                                                                                        Total: $2,355.00
End of Parent Involvement Goal(s)

Additional Goal(s)

April 2011                                                                                                           41
Rule 6A-1.099811
Revised April 29, 2011
 2011-2012 School Improvement Plan (SIP)-Form SIP-1
 * When using percentages, include the number of students the percentage represents next to the percentage (e.g. 70% (35)).
              ADDITIONAL GOAL(S)                                                                    Problem-Solving Process to Increase Student Achievement
       Based on the analysis of school data, identify and define             Anticipated Barrier                 Strategy                   Person or Position          Process Used to Determine           Evaluation Tool
                    areas in need of improvement:                                                                                            Responsible for                 Effectiveness of
                                                                                                                                               Monitoring                        Strategy
1. Additional Goal                                                    1.1.                          1.1.                             1.1.                        1.1.                                1.1.
                                                                      N/A                           N/A                              N/A                         N/A                                 N/A
Additional Goal #1:
                                   2011 Current      2012 Expected
                                   Level :*          Level :*

N/A                                N/A               N/A




                                                                      1.2.                          1.2.                             1.2.                        1.2.                                1.2.

                                                                      1.3.                          1.3.                             1.3.                        1.3.                                1.3.




                Professional Development (PD) aligned with Strategies through Professional Learning Community (PLC) or PD Activity
                                                                   Please note that each Strategy does not require a professional development or PLC activity.
      PD Content /Topic                                                                                         Target Dates and Schedules
                                                    PD Facilitator               PD Participants
      and/or PLC Focus             Grade                                                                         (e.g. , Early Release) and                                                  Person or Position Responsible for
                                                       and/or          (e.g. , PLC, subject, grade level, or                                       Strategy for Follow-up/Monitoring
                                Level/Subject                                                                  Schedules (e.g., frequency of                                                            Monitoring
                                                     PLC Leader                    school-wide)
                                                                                                                          meetings)
N/A                          N/A                  N/A                N/A                                   N/A                                 N/A                                         N/A




 Additional Goal(s) Budget (Insert rows as needed)
 Include only school-based funded activities/materials and exclude district funded activities /materials.
 Evidence-based Program(s)/Materials(s)
 Strategy                                                Description of Resources                                 Funding Source                                             Amount
 No Data                                                 No Data                                                  No Data                                                    $0.00


 April 2011                                                                                                                                                                                                               42
 Rule 6A-1.099811
 Revised April 29, 2011
2011-2012 School Improvement Plan (SIP)-Form SIP-1
                                                                                                  Subtotal: $0.00
Technology
Strategy                                  Description of Resources   Funding Source   Amount
No Data                                   No Data                    No Data

                                                                                                  Subtotal: $0.00
Professional Development
Strategy                                  Description of Resources   Funding Source   Amount
No Data                                   No Data                    No Data


                                                                                                  Subtotal: $0.00
Other
Strategy                                  Description of Resources   Funding Source   Amount
No Data                                   No Data                    No Data

                                                                                                  Subtotal: $0.00
                                                                                                    Total: $0.00
End of Additional Goal(s)


FINAL BUDGET (Insert rows as needed)
Please provide the total budget from each section.
Reading Budget
                                                                                               Total: $18,670.00
Mathematics Budget
                                                                                                Total: $5,800.00
Science Budget
                                                                                                Total: $2,700.00
Writing Budget
                                                                                                  Total: $850.00
Attendance Budget
                                                                                                Total: $3,000.00
April 2011                                                                                                   43
Rule 6A-1.099811
Revised April 29, 2011
2011-2012 School Improvement Plan (SIP)-Form SIP-1
Suspension Budget
                                                                                                                                                   Total: $0.00
Dropout Prevention Budget
                                                                                                                                                   Total: $0.00
Parent Involvement Budget
                                                                                                                                              Total: $2,355.00
Additional Goals
                                                                                                                                                   Total: $0.00


                                                                                                                                      Grand Total: $33,375.00




Differentiated Accountability
School-level Differentiated Accountability (DA) Compliance
Please choose the school’s DA Status. (To activate the checkbox: 1. double click the desired box; 2.when the menu pops up, select “checked” under “Default
Value” header; 3. Select “OK”, this will place an “x” in the box.)
School Differentiated Accountability Status
   Intervene                 Correct II                      Prevent II                     Correct I               Prevent I             N/A

       Upload a copy of the Differentiated Accountability Checklist in the designated upload link on the “Upload” page

School Advisory Council
School Advisory Council (SAC) Membership Compliance


April 2011                                                                                                                                                   44
Rule 6A-1.099811
Revised April 29, 2011
2011-2012 School Improvement Plan (SIP)-Form SIP-1
The majority of the SAC members are not employed by the school district. The SAC is composed of the principal and an appropriately balanced number of
teachers, education support employees, students (for middle and high school only), parents, and other business and community citizens who are representative of
the ethnic, racial, and economic community served by the school. Please verify the statement above by selecting “Yes” or “No” below.

         Yes                                                                                                       No

If No, describe measures being taken to comply with SAC requirement.


Describe the activities of the School Advisory Council for the upcoming year.
Monitor and review the School Improvement Plan for progress. Provide academic information to meeting participants. Schedule FCAT Parent Training Night, Literacy Night and
Subject Area Nights.




Describe projected use of SAC funds.                                                                                                           Amount
FCAT Camps for level 1 and 2 students in grades 3, 4 and 5                                                                                     $2219.00




April 2011                                                                                                                                                             45
Rule 6A-1.099811
Revised April 29, 2011

								
To top