Embed
Email

WP 5

Document Sample

Shared by: gegeshandong
Categories
Tags
Stats
views:
0
posted:
12/29/2011
language:
pages:
12
WP 5

Setting up a joint

procurement procedure

Part 1: WP5 overwiew



 Which obstacles to a common

trans- national procurement

initiative ?



 Which solution ?

What has been done



• Collect information through the partners and European

questionnaire



• Link with existing common procurement experiences



• Identify juridical state of the art tools

Compro participatory process

From the demand side

(convergence on common standards/specification ?)





From the supply side

(attitude of the industry towards buyers consortia)





From a juridical perspective

How can we join the order ?

Part 2: What to buy ?

(tech specs)

 Start from UITP Tender Structure for tendering of buses

and related services, functional specifications to try to

achieve common procurement standard;



 Proposition for a common clean bus = comparison of

each city requirement:

 OK = I agree to buy buses with proposition of compro standard

 KO N = I disagree to buy buses with proposition BUT it is negotiable

 KO NN = I disagree to buy buses with proposition and it is NON

negotiable

13.1 Accessibility  Conformity with directive EC-EU/2001/85

Item Semitan ATC Bremen obstacle for common spec

Nantes Bologna Standard N : negotiable

Door position Urban (door ahead ok

axle 1)



Door functions Door 1 : entry only From 2 to 4 doors All doors entry and exit see « position of command buttons for

(entry or exit, or both) Others doors : exit only ND pass.”

except door 2 for

wheelchair

Type and size of doors Double Each double Each double OK  door movement : in or out ?

(double / single leaf) Movement out N Movement in >> buyers’ compromise or option

(movement in / out)

Ramps Ramp automatic at ok Lift at door 1  wheelchair access : which door ? /

(automatic or manual) door 2 NN : legal standard in lift or ramp ?

NN : operation Bremen >> Serious difficulty to find common

spec

Step heights Between 320 and 350 ok 270 (Kneeling) ok

Accessibility for disabled 2 specific places 4 specific places 4 specific places near all ok : EC-EU/2001/85

doors (2001/85)

passengers near door 2 near door 2 4 specific places

NN: problems with

handicapped people  ? number of wheelchair places (1

organisations or 2 ?)

Position of the Outside : 1m20 high 2001/85 OK ok

emergency button Inside : top of the door

NN : regulation

Position of the command Outside : no button 2001/85 Outside: OK  If doors are in self-service (entry &

inside: ok + integrated in

buttons for non-disabled Inside : 1 button on exit), command buttons must be

handrails

passengers (outside and each door placed outside.

inside) >> Pre-wiring could be possible

Position of the command Outside : 1 button near 2001/85 2001/85 Ok : EC-EU/2001/85

buttons for disabled door 2 At each place for

passengers (outside and Inside : 1 button on disabled people

inside) each specific

wheelchair space

NN : regulation

Details of the table

ACCESSIBILITY

Type and size of doors (double /  door movement : in or out ?

single leaf) (movement in / out) >> buyers’ compromise or option

Ramps  wheelchair access : which door ? / lift or ramp ?

(automatic or manual) >> Serious difficulty to find common spec



Position of the command  If doors are in self-service (entry & exit), command

buttons for non-disabled buttons must be placed outside.

passengers (outside and inside) >> Pre-wiring could be possible





DRIVER’S CABIN

Dashboard lay out  dashboard layout : VDV or not ?

>> is VDV possible to be a standard for Europe ?

Ticketing equipment  error : ticketing is not validation (see « life

onboard »)

 equipment on driver post door : drawer ?

LIFE ON BOARD

Seat layout and seat design  seats : plastic or cloth ?

>> buyers’ compromise or option

Information system  vocal announcement : new french regulation

>> not included in the specs (to be added after)

Advertising equipment  advertising equipment : all different

>> not included in the specs (to be added after)

Validation equipment  number and place of validation equipments :

different

>> Pre-wiring near each door

Communication systems (radio, Network specific

GPS)

Emergency button and system  emergency command : pedal or button ?

for the driver >> buyers’ compromise or final adjustments





EMISSIONS (pollution and noise)  regulation : just regulation or better ?

>> clean buses wished or option

SAFETY

Fire safety system  fire safety system : engine extinguish system

>> buyers’ compromise or option

Hammers to break windows  hammers : position

>> not expensive : final adjustments

First aid kits  first aid kit : yes or no ?

>> not expensive : final adjustments

Exterior safety (acoustic signal  reversing safety system : which one ?

and cameras when reversing, >> not included in the specs (to be added after)

mirrors to reduce blind spots,

soft front)







GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS:  specific design : many points

Specific design (external, floor, >> not included in the specs (to be added after) or

fabrics) option or final adjustments … or serious obstacle for

common

In summary

• At first view : more convergence points than blocking points…

• …But the devil hides in details ?

Manufacturing overcosts:

– 10% are linked to national regulations (road regulation)

– 10% are linked to network facilities adaptation (AVL, radio systems,

ticketing, ramps etc..)

– 80% at the specific operation and commercial requirements (colours,

design, seats, places of the doors, driver cabins…)



• Go back to different manufacturers with a summary of the sepcs

table :

– what do they consider should be in the common base

– what can be optionnal , at which price

Examples of questions to

manufacturers



• Impact of door movement in or out ?

• Communication tools : Can pre wiring be compatible ?

• advertising panels, hammers for breaking windows seem

easy to deal with

• Seat, floor and external design sound more complicated





Need for « COMPROmise » between

partners

Part 3: Next steps



• Draft specifications

• Market the idea at each local level by proposing to

put into operation the first « european common

bus »,

• Find the legal way to be able to purchase

together



Related docs
Other docs by gegeshandong
Streambank Erosion Severity Index no photos
Views: 1  |  Downloads: 0
Capitulo_2_v1.1
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
吴永2
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
sir2007-5130
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Course Outline
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
DFAS_RS_Nov_29_2011
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Math Awards FY05-FY10
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
ECE Plan for __Tussey Mountain PreK Counts___
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
By registering with docstoc.com you agree to our
privacy policy

You are almost ready to download!

You are almost ready to download!