+
Bristol Business School
Academic Year: 09/10
Assessment Period: August
Assessment Type: Referral Coursework
Module Leader: Ed Little
Module Number: UMKC7Q-20-2
Module Name: Marketing
Word Limit: ….
Coursework Submission Date and Time:
Assignments are to be submitted by 2pm Monday 16 August 2010 at the
assignment boxes near Cribs coffee shop (2B corridor). Please be aware
that there is NO 24hr or 10 day window this year.
If you wish to post your assignment, we recommend that you post it via
Recorded Delivery and obtain proof of the date and time of posting. Your
work must be in the post by the deadline.
Deadline: Monday 16 August 2010 14:00
Assignment Instruction:
UNIVERSITY OF THE WEST OF ENGLAND, BRISTOL
LEVEL 2
Marketing
Module No UMKC7Q-20-2
Summer 2010
Referral assignment: Market Analysis and Strategic Recommendation
ASSIGNMENT TYPE: Individual report
ASSIGNMENT SUBMISSION: Monday, 16th August 2010
SUBMISSION PLACE: Boxes by Cribs B
MODULE LEADER: Ed Little Ed Little
Learning Outcomes
Upon completion of this assignment students will have demonstrated their
ability to:
apply marketing analysis frameworks to strategic marketing planning
decisions;
identify potential the threats and opportunities within a given market sector;
analyse the strengths and weaknesses of a chosen organization within that
market segment;
critically appraise the ability of that chosen organization to address the
threats and exploit the opportunities that exist within their sector;
generation of clear, rational and reasoned recommendations as to a
preferred course of action taking into account the short, medium and long
term future of the organization.
Assignment tasks
Taking the role of a Marketing Consultant, you have been asked by your
‘client’ to generate a report which includes a full market analysis and a set of
strategic recommendations to help secure their short (1-3 years), medium (3-5
years) and long term (5 years +) future. They have asked that this document
should take the form of a formal report and that all recommendations should
be fully supported by relevant marketing theory and recent market data.
Whilst you are free to choose your own ‘client’ organisation to study, it MUST
be drawn from ONE of the following five sectors:
Fast food restaurants
Education providers
Hotels
Footwear
Automotive
Please note that if you are re-taking this assignment as a DEFERRAL (i.e.
taking this assignment as if for the first time because of mitigating
circumstances), you should e-mail Ed Little (ed.little@uwe.ac.uk) in order to
discuss your choice of organisation/sector.
In order to complete this assignment satisfactorily, the following tasks need to
be completed:
1. Decide which market sector you would like to explore and identify an
appropriate, named organisation to study. (5% of assignment mark)
It is essential that you select an organisation from one of the sectors listed
above. Assignments that study an organisation that does not function in any
of the specified sectors will be deemed as having not met the specified
assessment criteria and will be immediately ‘referred’.
2. Undertake an analysis of your chosen market. (30% of assignment
mark)
Your analysis should encompass both the ‘macro’ and ‘micro’ factors that
impact upon the way that your ‘client’ functions within its given market sector.
You are expected to use a combination of marketing models and a variety of
up-to-date sources of market information to inform and illustrate your
discussions. PLEASE NOTE: THIS DOES NOT MEAN THAT YOU SHOULD
SIMPLY REHASH WHOLE MINTEL OR OTHER INDUSTRY REPORTS.
3. Identify and appraise the key opportunities and threats that face your
‘client’. (30% of assignment mark)
Over the course of your analysis, you should encounter a number of factors
that pose threats to your client’s market position or, alternatively, may offer
lucrative opportunities. Taking your client organisation’s strengths and
weaknesses into account, you are expected to appraise the relative
attractiveness of the options that they present in the short, medium and long
term.
4. Make clear and coherent recommendations as to the most appropriate
strategic choices in the short, medium and long-term. (30% of
assignment mark)
Having appraised the relative attractiveness of the options facing your client,
you must then make clear and well-justified recommendations. It is essential
that, when you make your recommendations, you support them using the
analysis that you have undertaken and, ideally, prioritise them.
5. This assignment should be structured in the form of a formal
business report of 2500 words (+/- 10%). (5% of assignment mark)
Marks are awarded for presentation, spelling, grammar and the appropriate
use of business terminology.
Report Components
The following document outline indicates the areas you need to consider
when preparing your report. The order in which you cover these areas is at
your discretion, the order shown below is simply a suggested one:
A) Introduction to report and the work which has been undertaken
A good ‘introduction’ section should set the scene for the report and clearly
indicate the market sector and organisation chosen. It should summarise the
aims and objectives of the report and perhaps say something about the
methods and sources used to compile it. Finally, it should briefly outline the
sections which are coming up in the remainder of the report to provide the
reader with ‘sign posts’ as to what the report contains.
B) Company/Organisation Profile
This section should provide an outline of the organisation, its history, its
position in the market (relative to its competitors i.e. relative market
share/growth) and its structure. You should be able to clearly discuss its
brands/product range and, most importantly, be able to identify the markets
within which it functions.
C) Market Analysis
This should feature a comprehensive view of what is happening in the market
and the impact that it is having, or is likely to have, on your client’s
organisation. It should encompass both the ‘macro’ and the ‘micro’ elements.
However, as stated previously, ‘comprehensive’ does not equate to a
rehashing of large chunks of a Mintel report. Whilst such reports are
obviously good sources of data, it is often the case that the reports that gain
the highest marks are those that have drawn information from a variety of
creditable sources. Please note that in the case of ALL sources, usage of
material should be properly and completely cited and referenced using the
Harvard Referencing system. As the central theme of this assignment is
‘analysis’, please resist the urge to reproduce data sources directly and
unquestioningly. You are expected to synthesise data from a number of
sources and consider its implications critically and analytically within the
context of your chosen organisation and its market.
D) Using Market Intelligence to Shape Strategic Decision-Making
Having collected data about the organisation and its marketing environment,
you are expected to use marketing models and frameworks to identify critical
success factors i.e. those actions that your chosen organisation should
undertake to optimise its position within the market. Whilst, at its most basic
level, it will include the construction of a ‘SWOT’ or ‘TOWS’ diagram, a good
assignment will go much further and include an informed discussion as to
what you view the key organisational priorities to be based upon the its ability
to capitalise upon its strengths to exploit opportunities and minimise threats.
Similarly, you should also consider the impact of the client organisation’s own
weaknesses and the extent to which you believe these need to be addressed
and be prepared to justify why. The reader should leave this section with a
clear idea as to the variety of potential options open to the client organisation
that might reasonably be explored.
E) Strategic Recommendations
In this section you, as the Consultant must offer the client organisation your
opinion as to how they should proceed. Good assignments will base their
recommendations upon the analysis that they have undertaken in the
previous sections. An ideal starting point is the statement of specific
marketing objectives for immediate attention that are based upon and justified
by prior analysis and recommendations as to how the might be best achieved.
Good assignments will also identify strategic objectives to address medium
and longer term challenges and opportunities.
F) References
All sources used in compiling the report should be cited fully using the
Harvard Convention for citation, and all citations should be fully listed in a
reference section. Details on the Harvard Convention can be found on the
library web-site: http://www.uwe.ac.uk/library. Click on ‘study and
information skills’, then ‘referencing’, then ‘Harvard’. A brief outline has also
been included at the back of this booklet.
It is appropriate throughout the report to make use of relevant marketing
frameworks for the consideration and presentation of material.
Assessment Criteria
1. Identification of an appropriate organisation as the basis of this study from one of the
five market sectors listed.
2. Detailed and insightful understanding of the chosen organisation and the markets that
it serves.
3. Detailed and thorough market analysis at both a ‘micro’ and ‘macro’ level.
4. Use of up-to-date market information in combination with appropriate theoretical
frameworks as a basis of the analytical process.
5. The ability to draw logical conclusions from the analysis undertaken and use it to
support strategic recommendations across different time frames (short, medium and
long).
5. Final report presented to a professional level and appropriately referenced.
Marking Guide
First Class. 70%+
Distinctive submissions that demonstrate exceptional learning in ALL the
following criteria:
- Tasks in assessment brief are comprehensively addressed and of a
consistently high standard;
- Clear integration and substantiation of relevant marketing tools;
- Submission has practical feasibility within industry context;
- Conclusions drawn at various stages are sustainable and appropriate;
- Effective and concise communication of ideas and written quality of report
format and writing
- Evidence of wider reading
- Clear acknowledgement of ALL relevant academic sources using Harvard
Referencing system;
- Outstanding presentation quality, structuring and meets specified word
limit.
Upper Second Class 60-69%
Above average submissions that demonstrate substantial learning in ALL the
following criteria:
- Tasks in assessment brief are comprehensively addressed and of a
consistently high standard;
- Integration and substantiation of relevant marketing tools demonstrated;
- Conclusions drawn at various stages are sustainable and appropriate,
though the comprehensiveness of the coverage may not be clear;
- Effective and concise communication of ideas and written quality of report
format and writing;
- Some evidence of wider reading
- Clear acknowledgement of ALL relevant academic sources using
HARVARD Referencing system;
- Strong presentation quality, structuring and meets specified word limit.
Lower Second Class 50-59%
Average submissions that demonstrate broad learning across the assessment
but with no outstanding areas:
- Tasks in assessment brief are addressed and of a consistently good
standard;
- Integration and support of relevant marketing tools with no major
omissions;
- Demonstration of continuity between the various stages of the NPD
process needs developing;
- Conclusions drawn at various stages need developing;
- Effective and concise communication of ideas and written quality of report
format and writing;
- Minimal evidence of further reading having been undertaken;
- Acknowledgement of majority of relevant academic sources using
HARVARD Referencing system;
- Good quality of presentation, clear structuring and minimal spelling/
grammatical errors. Meets specified word limit.
Third Class 40-49%
Submissions indicate poor but adequate learning in the module:
- Tasks in assessment brief are superficially covered, lacking in detail, with
minimal supporting explanation given;
- Main marketing tools are utilised but coverage and discussion weak;
- Conclusions drawn at various stages are weak and without academic
underpinning;
- Sufficient communication of ideas and written quality of report format and
writing, albeit weakly evidenced;
- No evidence of wider reading;
- Few academic sources cited and incorrect referencing system used;
- Adequate level of presentation some structural, spelling and grammatical
issues;
- Is either well over specified word limit or well under +/- 10%.
Referred < 40%
Submissions indicate minimal learning in the module:
- Inability to address the tasks set out in the brief, coverage of material
sparse;
- Fails to answer the tasks set;
- Minimal application of relevant marketing tools and misses key points;
- Minimal / no indication that the student is aware of and can use module
material;
- Conclusions drawn at various stages are sustainable and appropriate;
- Ideas and written quality of report format and writing not supported with
appropriate evidence;
- No evidence of wider reading
- Inaccurate citing of academic sources;
- Poor level of presentation, lacking structure, some structural, spelling and
grammatical issues.
- Is either well over specified word limit or well under +/- 10%
********* IMPORTANT *********
Plagiarism, collusion and non-compliance with assessment regulations are
offences under University regulations and where suspected, will be
investigated under official procedures. Penalties vary depending on the
severity of the offence but can include expulsion from the University.
Appropriate citation of source documents is essential when presenting written
work and it is crucial that you quote the books, journals, websites etc that you
used whilst researching your work. Information about referencing is available
from the Faculty Librarian or the library web pages at
www.uwe.ac.uk/library/resources/general/info_study_skills/refs.htm
For further information please see BBS Assessment Offence Guidelines for
Students.