Embed
Email

DEBT

Document Sample

Shared by: xiaoyounan
Categories
Tags
Stats
views:
0
posted:
12/25/2011
language:
pages:
18
INVESTIGATING RED FLAGS

in Section 2A of the SSG







Education Segment

Cincinnati Investment Model Club

The Problem









The trend in Section 2 A is down.

Don’t ignore the problem.

Do find out what has happened

Section 2A



• Section 2A tells us how good

management is at making

money.

The Problem -

The Percents in Section 2A are going down

There are 3 components to

Sales

Section 2A. These components

are Sales, Cost of Goods Sold

and Overhead. Cost of Goods Cost of goods

Sold and Overhead are often sold

referred to as expenses.

We expect the Cost of Goods Overhead Pre-tax

Sold and the Overhead to grow at Profit

about the same rate as the sales.

This is a sign of a well managed

company.

Reasons the numbers in Section

2A could go down

1. Sales are decreasing and the company has not

reduced expenses.

2 Cost of Goods Sold is growing faster than the sales

3. Overhead is growing faster than the sales



You must look at each of these to determine what is the

problem and then decide if it is a short term problem or a

long term problem.

If it is a long term problem, then you do not want to buy the

company. If you already own the company consider selling

if it is a long term problem.

Reason 1

The sales are decreasing

• This is easy to check out. Look at the graph

on Side one of the SSG.



• in the case of Dollar Tree this is not the

problem.

Comparing the Sales to the Cost

of Goods Sold and Overhead

• In order to compare the Sales with the Cost

of Goods Sold and the Overhead we will

have to convert the numbers into

percentages.

• The numbers we need are found on the

Income Statements for Dollar Tree.

To convert the numbers to a

percentage we will use this

formula

• Take this years amount and subtract last

years amount from it. Then divide that

answer by last years amount.

Chart comparing Sales to Cost of

Sales and Overhead









In 1999 the Cost of Sales grew faster than the sales but that was

offset by a big reduction in the Overhead.

In 2000 the Overhead grew significantly faster than the sales.

In 2001 both the Cost of Sales and Overhead grew faster than the

sales.

Now we know the problem. In the

past two years the Cost of Goods

Sold and/or the Overhead have

been growing faster than then

sales.





We turn to the Management

Discussion and Analysis in the 10K

or Annual Report to find out why.

What we learn in the MD & A

Section

• Dollar Tree is opening more of the larger

stores. These stores have lower sales per

square foot than the smaller stores, but

customers shop longer and buy more.



• Dollar Tree is adding a “higher proportion

of consumable merchandise, which

typically carries a lower gross profit

margin.”

Their Expectations for the Future

From the M D & A

Regarding Cost of Goods Sold

“We will continue to experience pressure on our gross

profit margins in future years as we refine our

merchandise mix to include a higher proportion of

consumable merchandise, which typically carries a lower

gross profit margin, open larger stores and continue to

absorb higher costs.”

The goal is to maintain a gross profit margin between 36

and 37%. (Gross Profit is the amount after Cost of Goods

Sold is subtracted from sales but before Overhead is

subtracted)

What they plan to do

From the M D & A section

1. They built two new distribution centers in 2001 to

partially offset the above factors with improved

domestic freight costs.

2. Vary the mix among the consumable merchandise

and variety categories to impact the gross margin.

Consumable merchandise sells more quickly than their

other merchandise resulting in increased sales

3. Installed a new scanner register and inventory

management system to better track the inventory and

move it to where it sells. They tailor the merchandise to

the demographics of the store.

Additional Cost of Goods Sold

Problems

Listed in the M D & A



• A “troubled distribution facility in

Philadelphia.” That has been closed and a

new one opened but there were added

expenses.

Overhead (or Operating)Expenses

The Problem

• There was a loss of leverage in payroll-

related costs and store operating

expenses.



• Operating leverage is the extent to which a

company’s costs of operating are fixed

(rent, insurance, management salaries) as

opposed to variable (salaries of sales

people, utilities)

The Solution- (from the MD & A Section)

Quote from the M D & A

• “We must control our merchandise costs,

inventory levels and our general and

administrative expenses. Increases in

expenses could negatively impact our

operating results because we cannot pass

on increased expenses to our customers by

increasing our merchandise price above

the $1.00 price point”

What we must decide?

• 1. Are the problems short term or long

term?



• 2. Will the solutions fix the problems?





THE ANSWERS ARE JUDGMENT



Related docs
Other docs by xiaoyounan
uses chart
Views: 2  |  Downloads: 0
least_squares_fit_manual
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
ENTERING_THE_ROADWAY_AND_BACKING_NOTES
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
FFaith presentation
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Ward_Nutritioin
Views: 1  |  Downloads: 0
0604477_Goldburg
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
salary-delegation-authority-summary-temporary
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
August 2011 _excel format_
Views: 19  |  Downloads: 0
1350 Tally FINANCE
Views: 1  |  Downloads: 0
Ch. 6.3.Martinez
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
By registering with docstoc.com you agree to our
privacy policy

You are almost ready to download!

You are almost ready to download!