Embed
Email

DESCRIPTION OF THE ADVERTISEMENT The television advertisement

Document Sample

Shared by: alice jenny
Categories
Tags
Stats
views:
0
posted:
12/22/2011
language:
pages:
1
1. Complaint reference number 153/00

2. Advertiser Kimberly-Clark Aust Pty Ltd (Huggies Ultra Dry)

3. Product Toiletries

4. Type of advertisement TV

5. Nature of complaint Discrimination or vilification Other – section 2.1

6. Date of determination Tuesday, 13 June 2000

7. DETERMINATION Dismissed



DESCRIPTION OF THE ADVERTISEMENT

The television advertisement begins with a man, a child’s sock appended to each ear, playing with a

baby. A woman enters the room and asks the man, ‘OK, big ears, can you change her?’ ‘Yeah, sure, in

a minute’, he replies. ‘Now, sweetie,’ she says, and leaves the room. The man feels the baby’s

bottom, re-fastens the nappy and continues to play with her. The woman returns. ‘So, did you change

her?’ she asks. ‘No need to. She was dry’, he replies. ‘Oh, sure, big ears’, she says, taking the baby.

‘Seriously, when I felt her, she was dry’, he responds. ‘She’s dry, but the nappy’s full’, says the

woman, handing the nappy to the man. ‘What a silly Daddy’, she says to the gurgling infant.

THE COMPLAINT

Comments which the complainants made regarding this advertisement included the following:

‘Women are looking more and more for assistance in the home, from men, and so I would suggest

you set a standard of encouragement and praise in your ads rather than a smug deliverance, which

is very off putting. …..perhaps if the roles in this were reversed, there would be howls of dismay

from the female population, crying “unfair” and “sexist”.’

‘Discrimination against the father being called “Big Ears”’.

THE DETERMINATION

The Advertising Standards Board (‘the Board’) considered whether this advertisement breached

Section 2 of the Advertiser Code of Ethics (‘the Code’).

The Board was of the view that the remarks of the woman within the advertisement were

affectionately delivered and did not constitute discrimination or vilification. The Board determined

that the advertisement did not breach the Code on these or any other grounds and, accordingly,

dismissed the complaint.



Related docs
Other docs by alice jenny
SPONSOR KIT Chicago VeganMania
Views: 1  |  Downloads: 0
Caring for Students With Diabetes
Views: 1  |  Downloads: 0
CD Newsletter OnLine Article
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
KOMEN DENVER RACE FOR THE CURE
Views: 2  |  Downloads: 0
EVIDENCE
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
By registering with docstoc.com you agree to our
privacy policy

You are almost ready to download!

You are almost ready to download!