Embed
Email

Why Turbine Noise Annoys_

Document Sample

Shared by: ghkgkyyt
Categories
Tags
Stats
views:
0
posted:
12/22/2011
language:
pages:
34
Why Turbine Noise Annoys!









www.dickbowdler.co.uk

Why Turbine Noise Annoys



• It is established that wind turbine noise annoys more that

most other noise with similar loudness.



• Nothing special about the effect of turbine noise that we

don’t already know



• There’s nothing mysterious

Warnings!





• Most windfarms are not a noise problem – but a

significant number are.



• Audio is much louder than you would hear it 500m or

more away.

– Intended to show character of noise









www.dickbowdler.co.uk

Factors that determine noise impact





• Loudness - Noise level in decibels



• Character of the noise

– Frequency distribution and tonality

– How noise varies with time





• Perception





www.dickbowdler.co.uk

Loudness - 1



• In low noise rural areas the ETSU-R-97 assessment

depends on lower limits.



– Up to 40dBA during the day and perhaps 10dBA above average

background noise

– 43dBA at night and perhaps 15dBA above average background

noise.





• No other industrial noise source would be allowed at that

level.







www.dickbowdler.co.uk

Loudness - 2

• In higher noise areas where limit is background + 5

• Impossible to formulate an accurate baseline.









www.dickbowdler.co.uk

Character - Frequency



• Tones – Can nearly always be fixed

– Penalty Applied



• Infrasound



• Low Frequency Noise









www.dickbowdler.co.uk

Character - Frequency









Infrasound – 1Hz, 600mm, 6Pa, 104dB



www.dickbowdler.co.uk

Character - AM



• Amplitude Modulation seems to be a major factor in the

adverse perception of turbine noise.



• Relentless



• We know very little about it.



• What do we know?







www.dickbowdler.co.uk

Character - AM



• 1989 -Jakobsen and Pedersen

–Modulation prominently in range 500Hz to 2kHZ.

• 1997 – Dunbabin

–Blade swish mainly at 500, 1k and 2kHz.

• 1996 ETSU-R-97

–Blade swish 800 to 1000Hz

• 1999 ETSU W391

–Modulation is most apparent in the 1 and 2 kHz octave bands









www.dickbowdler.co.uk

Character – AM - Swish





• The AM referred to up to about 2002 was almost all

related to the “swish” heard near the turbine.



• Swish









www.dickbowdler.co.uk

Character – AM – Swish - Oerlemans









www.dickbowdler.co.uk

Character – AM – Swish - Oerlemans

• In front



• You hear the swish from the down

stroke on the right.



• At Hub height swish disappears.



• At a distance swish disappears.





• And the same happens behind.



www.dickbowdler.co.uk

Character – AM – Swish - Oerlemans







• Downstroke Side - You hear the swish coming from the

blades as they go over the top of the trajectory.









www.dickbowdler.co.uk

Character – AM – Swish - Propagation







• The feature of Swish is that it does not propagate

downwind but at 45 degrees to downwind and

sometimes as far round as 90 degrees.



• Downwind there is no swish.









www.dickbowdler.co.uk

Character – AM – Swish - ETSU W391









• Swish rises and falls at about the same rate

• If anything the rate of rise is slower than the rate of fall.

• Swish again



www.dickbowdler.co.uk

Character – AM –Thump









• Thump rises fast and falls slowly









www.dickbowdler.co.uk

Character – AM –Swish to Thump









• First Swish

• Then moving into Thump



www.dickbowdler.co.uk

Character – AM –Thump - Van den Berg



• observes the difference between “thump” and “swish”.



• Turbines are audible for most of the (day and night) time

as a swishing sound. Thumping is only evident, at times

of high wind shear









www.dickbowdler.co.uk

Character – AM –Thump - Van den Berg





• AM is caused by the blades passing through air which

has varying speeds and directions whether this is due to

wind shear, meteorological turbulence or turbulence

created by topography or other turbines



• He considers that excessive wind shear (for example at

night) increases thump.









www.dickbowdler.co.uk

Character – AM –Thump - Hayes





• “The presence of high levels of modulation is associated

with wind direction and the inappropriate aerodynamic

conditions seen by the closest three wind turbines to the

dwelling.”



• That is to say these three turbines have turbulent air

striking them.









www.dickbowdler.co.uk

Character – AM –Thump - Hayes



• “the source of modulation may be related to wind shear

by which I refer to changes of wind speed and direction

at different heights above ground level.



• Thus the blades at [some] points in the arc may not be

fully pointed into the wind which may result in increased

aerodynamic noise.”









www.dickbowdler.co.uk

Conclusion - AM



• Swish does not occur Downwind

• Swish is mid to high frequency (500 to 2000Hz)

• Swish rises slowly and falls fast



• Thump occurs within 45 degrees either side of downwind

• Thump occurs at lower frequencies (125 to 250Hz)

• Thump rises fast and falls slowly.









www.dickbowdler.co.uk

Factor 3 - Perception



• EHOs and Consultants well aware that listeners attitude

is important.

• Does the listener perceive they have control of the noise? –

ETSU-R-97 Financial Involvement.





• Noise does not only have to be controlled but the impact

has to be managed.

– What is the relationship between the Exposer and the Exposee?









www.dickbowdler.co.uk

Perception - Eveline Maris



• “Exposer and Exposee” from the Dutch researcher.

• Another pair of words

Fair and Unfair

Does the exposee perceive that the exposer is being fair?

Maris established that when the exposer was not fair, annoyance

was higher.









www.dickbowdler.co.uk

Perception - Fair and Unfair – Developers



• “Turbine noise will be 10dB below the background noise

at 70 to 190m from the turbine”.

– Still well above background noise at 250m. Clearly heard in

bedroom

• “We want to involve the community in the project. We

want your views”

– We can’t tell you how big the turbines are – its not finalised yet.





– People don’t feel they are being treated fairly





www.dickbowdler.co.uk

Perception - Fair and Unfair – Developers



• People perceive that

– Their lives will be blighted by the development

– They gain no benefit

– They pay subsidies in the form of Tax

– They pay more for electricity.

– Developers make all the money





– People don’t feel they are being treated fairly









www.dickbowdler.co.uk

Perception - Fair and Unfair – Government



• “Advances in turbine technology have helped to avoid

increased noise from larger turbines”.

Typical 0.5MW turbine in 1996 is 100dBA. Typical 3MW turbine 2010 is 107dBA





• “No evidence to suggest that AM is as a result of

Turbine Size”

Members of NWG – arguably the people with best knowledge of turbine noise in

the UK – told DTI in 2006 “The trend for larger more sophisticated turbines could

lead to an increase in noise from AM”



• People don’t perceive they are being treated fairly





www.dickbowdler.co.uk

Perception - Fair and Unfair – Government



• Now:

• Commissions research into how ETSU-R-97 can be

applied in a more consistent and effective manner.



• It is not possible to apply ETSU-R-97 consistently



• Why?









www.dickbowdler.co.uk

Perception - Fair and Unfair – Government



• ETSU is inconsistent with other planning guidance in PPS22 and in

Local Plans.



• ETSU is inadequate in that it does not cover some essentials such

as the calculation of turbine noise.



• ETSU is out of date in that wind shear and AM are more significant

issues than they were in 1996 and are not covered.





• What is required is a revision and updating.





www.dickbowdler.co.uk

Perception - Fair and Unfair



Investigating a complaint can take years.





• Investigation is complex



• Planning conditions rarely have time scales attached.



• Developers are reluctant to turn turbines off





• People don’t perceive they are being treated fairly







www.dickbowdler.co.uk

Conclusions

• ETSU needs to be revised so it can be perceived as

being fair

– Removing lower limits

– Re-examining how margin over background works

• Research into AM as recommended by the NWG in 2006

should be carried out urgently

– Developers cannot predict whether they will have a problem

– Enforceable AM condition not possible

• Method of procurement must be changed.

– Incentives for community projects

• No evidence to suggest this would significantly reduce

investment in renewables

The Future







• The feed-in tariff is bringing a rush of small

developments – 10 to 20kW.

– New developers who produce incompetent reports

– Poor or non-existent manufacturers data

– Lack of a standard (ETSU does not apply)









www.dickbowdler.co.uk

A Trip to Rome?



Fourth International Conference on Wind Turbine Noise

12th – 14th April 2011



www.dickbowdler.co.uk 34



Related docs
Other docs by ghkgkyyt
By registering with docstoc.com you agree to our
privacy policy

You are almost ready to download!

You are almost ready to download!