Embed
Email

weitz-1999

Document Sample

Shared by: xiaoyounan
Categories
Tags
Stats
views:
0
posted:
12/20/2011
language:
pages:
24
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 104, NO. E8, PAGES 18,933-18,956,AUGUST 25, 1999









Spectral properties of the Marius Hills volcanic complex

and implications for the formation of lunar domes and

cones





Catherine M. Weitz • and James W. Head III

Brown University,Providence,

Departmentof GeologicalSciences, RhodeIsland





Abstract. We haveusedmultispectral datafrom the Clementine UV-visible camerato studythe

of to

volcanicfeatures the MariusHills complexandtheircomparison otherlunardomesand

cones.Thereare several mareunitsidentifiedin thecomplex, eachwith a uniqueTi content, as

by in

indicated their415/750 nm value. The domes MariusHills are spectrally identicalto the

mare plainsof the complex,supporting similar compositions.In contrast, most of the volcanic

of

cones thecomplexarelowerin reflectance, bluerin color,andhaveweakermafic absorptions

thanthemareanddomes.The spectral of can

characteristics thecones bestbe explained fine- by

in

grainedcrystallization the spatter the

that compose cones. Other lunarcones,suchasMons

Esam in northernTranquillitatis,have spectral properties similarto thoseat Marius Hills. The

and dark

Rima Parrycones theirassociated mantledeposit appearredder with a strongermafic

absorption than the Marius Hills cones. The conesIsis and Osirisin southern Mare Serenitatis,

of

thedomes RumkerHills, andseveral in

domes northern are

Mare Tranquillitatis spectrally

similarto adjacent mare units. The Mairan andGruithuisen domesin northernOceanus

Procellarum havea feldspathic signature of

characteristic highland materialalthough they areredder

andbrighter thanadjacenthighland to

soils. They appear represent highland materialthat

resembles domes rather than actual mare domes, like those at Marius and Rumker Hills. The

of can by in

diversity lunarvolcanicfeatures bestbe explained differences accumulation ratesand

coolingof ejectedclasts from variouseruptionstyles. Mare domes may haveformedat lower

effusion smallshields

rates,therebyallowinglava to construct 200 km depths and the resulting phaseangles. Thereforewe usedonly these lower-phaseangle

eruptions werelikely at high effusionrates. Cones at Rima orbits to producethe mosaics and color ratio images. When

as by of

ParryV wereinterpreted having formed degassing a spectrawere taken from other areasof the Moon, we listed the

near-surface dike [Head and Wilson, 1993], indicating that phase angle, and for the spectral ratios, we applied this

undercertain circumstances, was possible to produceonly

it 30

wavelengthcorrectionto a standard ø phase angle [McEwen,

cones and no associated mare on the Moon. 1996]. All spectra were taken using 4x4 pixel boxes, and

Studies of lunar domes and cones have been restricted to to from largeerrorsandpoor data

thosethat appeared suffer

LunarOrbiter(LO) and Apollo photographic quality were rejected. Several individual Clementine frames

high-resolution

of

imagesbecause the small size of these features. Galileo were mosaicked togetherboth alongand across orbits to cover

spectraldataof the Marius Hills region indicatedcomplex the Marius Hills region and the other lunar domesand cones.

variations in volcanic activity, including variability in the Because each Marius Hill's mosaic combines orbits taken at

composition the basaltsand pyroclasticdeposits[Sunshine

of differentphaseangles, there are subtle color variations that

et al., 1994]. The resolutionof the Galileo data was only 1.5- can be seen across the mosaics because of variations in the

2 km, making it difficult to studythe spectralpropertiesof the photometriccorrectionas a function of wavelength. In

smaller domesand cones. Only now do we have Clementine contrast,all color differencesseenalong eachorbit are more

multispectral data with resolutions below 200 m to resolve indicativeof compositional variations ratherthan calibration

these featuresand show their spectralcharacteristics. In this errors. The color ratio imagesare simply a way to show

paper, we have usedClementine UV-visible (UVVIS) data to relative compositional differences between the various

examine the various volcanic features of the Marius Hills geologic units. Quantitative differencesare identified in the

region. We have also studiedvolcanic domesand conesfrom spectrafor these units.

other regions of the Moon for comparison, including (1) the Color ratio images were producedand used to assist in

cones Isis and Osiris in southeastern Mare Serenitatis; (2) identifyingvariousgeologicunits. Eachcolor ratio consists

Rima Parry V conesin Fra Mauro crater; (3) the cones Mons of (1) 750/415 nm ratio in the red channel;(2) 750/950 nm in

Esam and domes Grace and Diana in northern Tranquillitatis; the green channel; and (3)415/750 nm in the blue channel.

(4) the domes of Rumker Hills in northern Oceanus of

The 415/750 value,or UV/VIS slope,is a measure both the

Procellarum; and (5) Mairan and Gruithuisen domes in color andthe maturitylevel for lunarsoils. An important

northeasternOceanusProcellarum. Our goal was to use the characteristic of lunar soils is their maturation over time due to

spectralpropertiesof the lunar cones and domesin order to weathering.

space causes strength the 1000

Maturation the of

determineif they were spectrally distinct from the mare and nm absorptionand the overall reflectanceto decreasewhile the

whether these differences could be used to learn more about the continuumslope (i.e., 750/415 ratio) increases[Pieterset al.,

volcanic activity that emplacedthe features. Fischer

1993a; andPieters,1994]. Space produces

weathering

18,936 ANDHEAD:

WEITZ HILLS

MARIUS COMPLEX

VOLCANIC



this optical alteration by the development of a regolith color for a mare unit implies a relatively low TiO2 content

containing









"':'.... ' *4





..•:..::' :::'::>...._•:::: ...., :•** ::::;

...,.. .... ....... ..... '?: .':

e:.'.

ß .................... '::.:

;•,.:.:;:;, :.:K':"';;









......

::;:,;;•;;:.; .... a::a'":'

.:.:F•::.









Figure •. High-resolutionLO V-216 photo illustratingseveraltypes of cone morphologies. A horseshoe-shaped

cone to the south (•lack-white •ow) has been breachedto the southwest, •d it has visible layering along the

in

fl•ks. A l•ger coneto the right (white •ow) hasbeenbreached both the north •d southwhere a channel can be

seenemergingfrom eachdirection. The cone in the north (black •ow) has • i:egula shape, •d it too has been

breached. Locationshownin Figure 2 and North is at the top.







Plate lb shows the location of 121 domes and 46 cones in the LO of of

resolution V images portions the Marius Hills region

region. Topographic data showthat the low domesare 25 km show that many of the cones have a horseshoeappearance

in diameterand 50-200 m high, while the steeperdomesare 2- (Figure6). Morphologically, these conesare very similar to

15 km in diameterand 200-500 m in height [Whitford-Stark terrestrial cinder cones, such as those in Hawaii and the Snake

and Head, 1977]. Figure 5 shows a high-resolution LO V River Plain. The horseshoe appearanceindicates that the

image of several domes. The large dome at the top (black cones were breached on one side where lava flowed out. Cones

arrow) has a flatter, smoother surfacebelow and two rougher, on

are located both on the mare and superimposed domes.

steeperdomes superimposed. Otherdomes showa similar two- Figure 6 showsthreeconeslocatedto the west on the plateau.

part sequence with a smooth, broad dome beneath rougher, The largestcone (white arrow) is situatedon a dome, and it has

steeper domes. In the Clementine data, the domes are been breached both to the north and south, where a channel can

spectrally indistinguishable from the surrounding mare. be seenemergingfrom eachbreach. A smaller cone located to

Domes are visible in both the red and blue mare units shown inthe south(black-white arrow) has a horseshoeappearance and

Plate lb. Many of the domes have sharp, truncated boundaries possible layering inside the cone. The third cone (black

with the adjacentmare plains, indicating that the domeshave arrow) has a very irregular shape and also shows breaching

been embayedby younger mare and therefore represent a where a channelcan be seenemergingto the north.

relatively older stageof volcanismin the region. The volcanic cones are readily visible as black spots in

The volcanic conesin the complex are <3 km in diameter Plate l a, and they are located in both the red and blue mare

and<300 m in height[Whitford-Stark Head, 1977]. High- unitsof Plate lb. There are numerous

and dark spots in the color

18,942 WEITZ AND HEAD: MARIUS HILLS VOLCANIC COMPLEX





0.72

ß Blue Mare

¸ Red Mare

O Intermediate Mare

ß Dark Spots







i

0.70

[] Red Spots







0.68 -









0.66 -

.









¸ o





0.64 -

_









~









¸ []

0.62 -

¸ []









0.60



0.93 0.94 0.95 0.96 0.97 0.98 0.99 1.00



750/900 nm



Figure7. Ratio for

values thevolcanic

features Marius

of (DS),which

Hills. Thedarkspots to

correspondvolcanic

cones, colorandweakest

havethebluest maficabsorption. contrast, redspots

In the several

(RS) thatsurround cones

a and

have veryredcolor strong compared themare darkspots.

maficabsorptions to and







ratio images that have not been identified as conesby previous penetrated the

through mareto the centralpeak of Mariusand

investigators, perhaps becausea significant amount of the a

exposed mixtureof mareandfeldspathic highlandmaterial.

cone has been destroyed. Although there may be other cones can

Smalldark spots be seenalong the wall of Marius, one in

in the complex,in Plate lb we show only the conesidentified and

the southwest anotherin the northwest (Figure8). Both

by previous investigatorson the basis of LO photos. In a few and

havelow reflectances spectra with flatter slopesbetween

by

cases,the dark spotsare surrounded red circles in the color to

the 415 and750 nm channelscompared the maresoils. A

ratio images. In the LO images, the dark spots correspond to plausible explanation for these dark spots is that they

the interior of the cones, while the red circles represent the representlocalized dark mantle deposits producedfrom

cone flanks. Figure 7 showsa plot of 415/750 versus750/900 vulcanian eruptions,similarto dark spots seenon the floor of

nm for some of the volcanic cones and mare units. The dark the craterAlphonsus [Head and Wilson, 1979; Coombset al.,

spotsassociated with the volcanic coneshave the bluest color 1990].

and weakest mafic band of all the units, while the red spots Several large depressionsare visible in the Marius Hills

have the strongest mafic absorption and a 415/750 ratio region and are shownin Plate lb (cross-hatched areas). The

similar to the reddestmare units. An interpretation of the depressions to

located thenorthof Mariuscrater haveupraised

in

volcanic cones spectrais discussed section 4.6 when they rims andoval shapes. They are also alignedalong wrinkle

are comparedto other lunar cones. in

ridges themareandarepartially in

visible Plate 1A by their

3.3 Other Features

bright greencolor along the walls. We suggest that these

featuresformedduringlava migration and drainageor from

Marius craterhas a bright blue color along its walls where magma withdrawlat depthwhichcaused at

collapse the surface.

freshmare hasbeen exposed(Plate lb). The crateris 40 km in of

Onefinal feature interestin the regionis a streakin the

diameterand, using crater excavation estimates for this size south blue is

thatappears in Platela. The streak a portionof

crater [Melosh, 1989; Cintala and Grieve, 1994], the crater the Reiner Gamma Formation located to the south. It has been

shouldhave excavateddown to 4-6 km depth. Thereforethe as ray

proposed a crater from Cavalerius its

although unusual

mare must be at least several kilometers thick in this area since shapeandmagneticpropertiessuggest other possibilities,

the ejecta is spectrally characteristic of the basalt units. including gas

recent emissions [McCauley, 1967]. Telescopic

Becausethe crater has been embayedby younger mare, its multispectral imagesof Reiner Gammaby Bell and Hawke

stratigraphyindicates that a significant amount of volcanism a

[1981]showed deep0.95 gm pyroxene and

absorption no red

occurred both before and after crater formation. At the center continuum of

characteristic maturesoils. From spectral

of Marius is a small crater (-2 km diameter) that appears mixing models,Bell andHawke [1981] suggested that the

to

relatively blue in Plate l a compared other craters, which brightareas by of

weredominated majoramounts very fresh

appeargreen. Spectrafor the crater walls indicate a weak mafic mare basaltfragments of

with minoramounts freshhighland

absorption to

but a high reflectancecomparable the other fresh rocks. A studyof the FormationusingClementinedatashowed

craters. Therefore we suggest that the crater may have to

a high soil iron content(14%) compared the surrounding

WEITZ AND HEAD: MARIUS HILLS VOLCANIC COMPLEX 18,943









750 of

Figure 8, Clementine nm mosaic Marius (40 showdarkspots

crater km diameter).Thetwo whitearrows

localizeddark mantledeposits.

alongthe craterwalls that may represent







of

mareandthepresence extremely immature maresoils [Pinet imagesto determinethe heights and slopes of Isis and Osiris.

et al., 1997]. Our Clementine resultsindicate a high albedo, Figure 10 showsprofiles acrosseach of the cones. Osiris has a

low 750/415 ratio, and a moderate750/950 value comparedto to

symmetricalshapeperpendicular the rille, while along the

the adjacentplains units. Reiner Gammadoesnot have the rille it is higher to the south. It has a height of 90 m and a

samestrong mafic absorptionband as fresh impact craters, width of 2.5 km on the basisof the E-W transect,with a slope

which is why it appearsblue in Plate l a rather than green. of 7.0ø. For comparison, the cones of Marius Hills have

we

Therefore agreewith the previouswork by Bell andHawke heights <300 m and widths <3 km [Whitford-Stark and Head,

[1981] and Pinet et al. [1997] that this portion of the Reiner 1977]. Slopesfor terrestrialconescan be up to 33ø because of

GammaFormation can best be explainedas a mixture of fresh the angle of repose for cinders, but the greater dispersalof

mare andhighlanddebris. clastson the Moon favors lower slopes [McGetchin and Head,

1973; Wilson and Head, 1981]. Isis has a more asymmetric

shapethan Osiris, both along and perpendicularto the rille.

4. Other Lunar Volcanic Cones

Apollo 17 photographs show that the northwestern rim is

We have also studied cones and domes from five other breached, and a channel can be seenemerging from the cone.

locations on the Moon (Figure 1) to assist in our Isis is about 70 m high and 2 km in diameteron the basis of

interpretationof the Marius Hills spectra:(1) the cones Isis thetransect to

perpendidulartherille (SW-NE),with a slopeof

and Osiris in southeastern Mare Serenitatis; (2) cones 7.1ø. The other cones along the rille are too small to be

associatedwith the rille Rima Parry V in Fra Mauro crater; (3) resolved in the topography.

the cones of Mons Esam and the domes Grace and Diana in In the Clementine data, the cones are only a few pixels

across because of their small size and resolution of the data.

.(4)

northernTranquillitatis; the domesof RumkerHills in

northwestern Oceanus Procellarum; and (5) Mairan and The conesarejust visible in the 750 nm imagesbecause their

Gruithuisen domes in northern Oceanus Procellarum. flanks are slightly higher in reflectance than the adjacent

mare. Spectrally, the cones appear to be similar to the

4.1 Isis and Osiris adjacentmare, unlike the cones at Marius Hills, which have

lower reflectancesand weaker mafic absorptions than the

IsisandOsirisare the largestof five conesalignedalong a neighboringmare soils.

linear rille in southeasternMare Serenitatis (Figure 9) [Scott,

to of

1973]. The rille is recognizable the south the cones,but, 4.2 Rima Parry V Cones

beginningwith Osirisandextending northto Isis, it becomes

lessvisible in the Apollo 17 photographs.Isis and Osiris are The 50 km long linear rille Rima Parry V is located in

locatedat the edgeof the basin, so it is possible that other Fra

southern Mauro crater (Figure 11). Justoffset from the rille

cones once existed farther inside the basin but became is a row of volcanic cones to the west (black arrow) and two

completelyburiedas the basin filled up with youngermare. cones to the east [Wilhelms, 1987; Head and Wilson, 1993].

We haveused topographicmaps derived fromApollo 17 stereo Head and Wilson [1993] suggested that the cones were

18,944 WE1TZAND HEAD:MARIUS HILLS VOLCANICCOMPLEX





N













Isis









Small

Cone •"."

A





Osiris









2 krn









(AS and map Isis in Mare

Figure 9. Apollo17 image 17-2317) sketch of thecones andOsiris southeastern

Serenitatis.Isis is to the north,Osirisis to the south,andsmallerconesarein between. All the conesarealigned

along extensiona graben

linearly the of visible thesouth.

to Also are of profiles

shown thelocations topographic

in

presented Figure 10.







composed spatterand produced

of from strombolianeruptions north. The cone appearsin morphology to be broaderand

from a near-surface dike. On the basis of the horizontal flatter, though,than thoseto the north. An unusualdepression

extensionof the graben, the top of the dike is estimatedto be to the westof the rille (small white arrow) is morphologically

at 650 m depthwith a width of about150 m [Headand Wilson, by

similarto pit cratersproduced magmawithdrawlat depth.

1993]. Spectra of the cones and other geologic units are In the color ratio image (Plate 2a), the cones are

shownin Figure 12. Using representative for

spectra highland indistinguishable from the surrounding terrain. Freshimpact

rocks taken by Tompkins and Pieters [1999, Figure 7], we craters appear blue and green, indicating the presence of

to

interpretthe H2 spectrum representanorthositeexposedby the

highlandmaterial. Surrounding Rima Parry V cones is a

a fresh crateron the southernrim of the crater Parry (Plate 2a). of

darkveneer debristhat is visible in the 750 nm image and

H1 showsa larger crateron the rim of Parry-Bonpland(Plate theLO photograph. The debrishas the samespectrum the as

2a) that couldrepresent mixtureof gabbroand anorthosite.A

a cones. The Alphonsus dark mantle deposits (Figure 1) are

fresh crater on the smooth plains (Plate 2a, FC) has a shape thought to form from vulcanian eruptions when a caprock in

similar to H1 but much lower reflectance, suggestingthat it is the conduit gas

caused buildupuntil enoughoverpressurization

more mature. The smoothplainsthat coverthe region have an permittedan eruption that emplaceda localized dark mantle

anorthositic signature although it is relatively low in deposit[Head and Wilson, 1979; Hawke et al., 1989; Coombs

reflectance, suggesting that it is composedof mature soils et al., 1990]. There are no volcanic cones associated with the

from an impact melt origin. A fresh highland signature is Alphonsus deposits;instead,they have centralpits aligned on

observedonly where there has been masswasting or exposure linear rilles. Therefore, while the Alphonsus eruptions

by youngercraters. Comparedto the smoothplains,the cones emplaced only a dark mantle deposit from vulcanianactivity,

have a lower reflectance,a slightly larger 415/750 value, and a the Rima Parry eruptions appear to be strombolian style

similar 750/950 value. There is no indicationin the spectraof activity that produced both dark mantle depositsand spatter

any mare plains in the area that may have been erupted in cones. A further discussionof the types of eruptions is

association with the formation of the cones. discussed in section 5.

In addition to the cones identified on the floor of Fra Mauro

crater,thereis a large coneon the floor of the crater Bonpland,

4.3 Cones and Domes in Northern Tranquillitatis

about 10 km offset to the eastof the Rima Parry V rille (Figure

11, large white arrow). LO V images show an unusual feature There are numerous mare domes located in northeastern

here, but it has not yet been documented volcanic. In the

as Tranquillitatisbasin. Most of the domes are found within the

Clementine data, the cone has the spectral shape and low high-Ti mare,but a few are alsoin the older low-Ti mare farther

reflectance characteristic of the Rima Parry V cones to the there exists topographic

north [Staidet al., 1996]. Because

WEITZ AND HEAD: MARIUS HILLS VOLCANIC COMPLF_,X 18,945









tq UJ



Z

<:









(w) j. H91=JH (w) .I.H913H









o

o









(m) 1H913H

(m) .I.H•I•IH

18,946 WEITZ AND HEAD: MARIUS HILLS VOLCANIC COMPLEX









11. 16 photo

Figure Apollo P-5425 ofRima Parry rilleand

V volcanic (black The

associated cones arrow). bright

highlands tothe of craters Mauro and

correspond rims the Fra (top) Bonpland(bottom). large

The white shows

arrow

cone

another on Earth. farther the

craters seen

located to south. small

The white arrow an

indicatesunusual that pit

depression resembles





data derived from Apollo 15 photography for the more 160 m highand8 km across, with a slopeof 2.0ø. Its central

northern domes, we have focused. on them. These domes pit is 1 km wideand80 m deep. Dianais shorter than Grace,

includeGrace,Diana, and an unnamed dome (Figure 13). In butit hasa muchdeeper pit.

central It is 45 m high and5 km

additionto the domes, Mons Esam representsoverlapping deepcentralpit

wide,with a slopeof 2.6ø. Its unusually

cones aligned linearly, similar to the Rima Parry V cones. to

compared its smallheight be to

could attributed embayment

Topographic profiles for the domesGrace and Diana and the of the coneby other mare(perhaps from Grace),thereby

conesof Mons Esamare shown in Figure 14. Graceis about its but

reducing height. MonsEsamis only 4 km across over





ratio and of

Plate2. Color images 750nmframes lunar

domes cones

and studied thispaper.The

in ratios

the in in

represent 750/415 red,750/950 green, 415/750 blue. (Plate Thecones

and in 2a) with

associated therille

Parry are

Rima by

V shown blue arrows. cones associated mantle

The and dark have in

deposits a lowalbedo the750

In color image, blue

nmmosaic. the ratio fresh while red orange

the represents highlands, the and show

colors more

highland Nomare can identified. H2,and represent locations in Figure

mature soils. units be H1, FC spectra shown

The Grace Diana and unnamed (U)along thecones

12.(Plate2b) domes (G), (D), an dome with Esam are

Mons (ME)

by in

shown an-ows the750nmimage.Mons Esam a much

has albedo thedomes, characteristic at

lower than a seen

Hills 2c) in

Marius aswell. (Plate Outlined yellow the750nmimage thelocations 11domes,

on are of while the

Rumker is in

Hills boundary shown white. Thedomes red

havethe same colorasthe mareon the RumkerHills.

the Hills

SurroundingRumker areother mareunits higher contents. 2d)Twoof thethree

with Ti (Plate domes

Mairan

are in 750 image yellow

shown the nm by arrows. domes a red

The similar theadjacent

have color to highlands.

2e) Gruithuisen areshown these

(Plate All three domes in images. domes

The appear redder the

slightly than

highlands thecolorratioimage.

surrounding in

WEITZ AND HEAD: MARIUS HILLS VOLCANIC COMPLEX 18,947









A B

N. Tranquillitatis

Rima Parry









H1









2O km 20 km





c D

Mairan Domes

Rumker Hills









III





30 km





E Gruithuisen Domes









20 km

20 km

18,948 WEITZ AND HEAD: MARIUS HILLS VOLCANIC COMPLEX



i , , , I , , , , I , , , • I • • • • I .... I , , , , I



4000 Cones • Highlands

--•- -Volcanic I[

• Plains ---I•--Highlands

-Smooth 2

Crater

- -&-- Fresh

3500









3000





2500 mmffff

.... m

.• m.m

m

• 2ooo .•' .---- . .•... -•- - -

ffmmfmmm

ffmmff mmm

. .





-

• • ...... •--••

lOOO







500 ' ' ' ' I ' ' ' ' I ' ' ' ' I ' • ' ' I ' ' ' ' I ' ' ' ' I



r00 500 600 700 800 900 1000



Wavelen•,h

Figure 12. Spectrafor Rima Parry V conesand other geologicunits. The cones have a low reflectance and a weak

mafic absorption that may be due to volcanic glasses or glassy spatter. The other spectra are characteristicof

anorthositic commonlyfound in highland rocks [Tompkinsand Pieters, 1999].

breccia and noritic signatures







ø, it to

260 m high, with a slopeof 11.0 making comparable The high-Ti mare has a lower reflectancethan the low-Ti mare.

the conesof Marius Hills and Isis and Osiris. Central pits are Another unnameddome located farther to the west (Plate 2b, U)

although

visiblealongthe structure, they aretoo smalland in the low-Ti mare has a large pit crater. Grace is spectrally

shallowto be resolvedin the topographydata. similar to this unnameddome except that it has a slightly

The color ratio image(Plate2b) showsa red, low-Ti mare stronger mafic absorption. Diana has a spectrum that is

anda blue,high-Timare. Spectra in 15

shown Figure reveal in

intermediate reflectance and shape betweenthe high-Ti mare

that Mons Esam is similar to the high-Ti mare but with a and the unnamed dome. Thereforeit appears that Graceand the

slightlyflatterUV/VIS slope(i.e., higher415/750 value). unnameddome eruptedas part of the low-Ti mare eruptions

in

Mons Esamhas the lowestreflectance the image, similar to followed by emplacementof younger high-Ti mare and the

of

the low reflectance the Rima ParryV andMariusHills cones. Mons Esam cones. Diana appearsto representan intermediate-









Figure 13. Apollo 17 frame M-305 showing the domes Grace (black arrow) and Diana (black-white arrow) in

northernMare Tranquillitatis. The conesof Mons Esam are to the northeastand anotherunnameddome (Mute arrow)

is to the west.

WEITZ AND HEAD: MARIUS HILLS VOLCANIC COMPLEX 18,949



DIANA









GRACE 6400







6500 6500









6300 6300







6400









6200



4 6 8 0 2





Distance (km) Distance (km)





MONS ESAM







6600 660O









650O 65O0









6400









63OO

0 2 4 6 8 9





Distance (km)



Figure 14. Topographic for

profiles Grace, Diana,andMonsEsam (LunarTopophotomap61A2S1). Graceand

are with central

Diana relativelylow features shieldvolcanoes.Thecones Mons

pits, very similarto Icelandic of

are and

Esam steeper rougher, of and

whichis moretypical spatter rampart on

cones Earth.





Ti unit or a spectral mixture of the low-Ti and high-Ti mare mare to the east. The orange unit located to the southwestis

units. spectrally similar to the mare on the Hills but has a weaker

UV/VIS slope. Because the domesare spectrally identical to

4.4 Domes of the Rumker Hills the mare on the Hills, it supports Whirford-Starkand Head's

[1977] interpretation that the domes were producedby low

on

Over 30 domesmay be concentrated the 80 km diameter

effusion rates, perhaps at the terminal stages of the eruptions

Rumker Hills in northern Oceanus Procellamm [Smith, 1974].

that emplacedthe mare on the Hills. We do not believe that

Plate 2c shows the Clementine color ratio image with the 1 1

the domesrepresentstratovolcanoes, as suggested Smith by

largestdomesoutlinedon the 750 nm mosaic. Smith [1974]

[1974], because on Earth stratovolcanoes form above

dividedthe domesinto three types, each related to a different

subductionzones by multiple eruptions of lava flows and

eruptionperiod. All the domesappearrelatively flat compared

pyroclastic deposits and we see no evidenceof this at Rumker

to those of Marius Hills, with a smooth, circular appearance Hills. The blue craters seen in the north of Rumker Hills have

and somewith possiblesummitpit craters [Whitford-Stark and

a spectrum of

(Figure 16, Crater Wall) characteristic highland

Head, 1977]. In the color ratio image, Rumker Hills has a

material. We propose that the highland material was either

brightred color. To the west are youngerred mare, and to the

east are blue mare units. Several of the northern craters on the

carriedin by secondarycratersor exposedbeneath the low-Ti

mare in the north.

Hills have a blue color, indicating the presence of either

highlandmaterialsor low-Ti mare. 4.5 Mairan and Gruithuisen Domes

Spectra for the various geologic units in the image are

shownin Figure 16. One of the domesis spectrallyidentical The Mairan and Gruithuisen domes are distinguished by

to the mare on the Rumker Hills, suggesting that it was their red color in the infrared, their high topography,and their

produced from the same eruption that emplacedthe low-Ti morphological similarity to volcanic domes [Head and

mare. The purplemareunit in Plate2c just west of the Rumker McCord, 1978]. Their morphology and texture have been

Hills has the lowest reflectance, even lower than the high-Ti interpretedto be due to more silicic compositionscomparedto

18,950 WEITZ AND HEAD: MARIUS HILLS VOLCANIC COMPLEX



, , , , I , , , , I [ , ] , I , , J , I , , , , I , , , , I

1200









11oo

/

/

/

/

/

lOOO /

/

/

/

/

/

900 /

/





/

/



800

/

/



;. Grace

'-I

ß "Diana

7OO

-- ß -Mons Esam

- -&- - Low-Ti Mare

ß - v- - High-Ti Mare

• Unamed Dome

6OO









500 .... i , , ,,, • , , , ' I ' ' ' ' I ' ' ' ' I ' ''' ' I

400 500 600 700 800 900 1000





Wavelength (nm)



e of and

Figur 15. ThespectrumGrace anunnamed aresimilar

dome Grace a slightlystronger

except has mafic

Both similar the

absorption. are to low-Ti but

mare withlower

reflectances. isintermediate

Diana the

between high-

andlow-Tiunits.Mons is to

Esam similar thehigh-Ti

mare slightly

although in

lower reflectance.





mare domes [Head.and McCord, 1978]. Head amt McCord all threeGruithuisendomes.TheMairandomes as

appear a red

[1978] observed that their strong ultraviolet absorption color, similar to the adjacenthighlands. The Gruithuisen

distinguishedthem from the highlands and could indicate a domes red to

also appear compared the bluish-redhighland

lower content of iron or titanium. Plate 2d shows the color soils.

ratio image and 750 nm frame for two of the Mairan domes, Figures17 and 18 show the spectrafor the variousdomes

while Plate 2e illustrates the color ratio and 750 nm mosaic for andgeologic all

units. The domes have spectra characteristic





1800







1600







1400







1200







IOO0







800 --- -- Rumker Hills

ß - •- - Dome

-'-I' - Intermedlate-Ti Mare

6OO •-- High-Ti Mare

--O-- Low-Ti Mare

-

ß z3- - Crater Wall



4OO



400 500 600 700 800 900 1000



Wavelength(nm)

of Hills surrounding units.The

Figure 16. Spectra theRumker and mare are indistinguishable

domes spectrally

the on Rumker The

from mare the mare

Hills. other units in their

vary UV/VIS and absoftions all

slopes mafic but

flatter

have UV/VISslopes

compared Rumker The

tothe Wall refers blue

Hills. Crater spectra tothe secondary craters

the of matehal.

in thenorththatindicate presence highland

WEITZ AND HEAD: MARIUS HILLS VOLCANIC COMPLEX 18,951





, , , , I , , , , I , , , , I , , , , I , , , , I , , , , I

2500

-- -- Mare



' ' O' ' Highlands

• -Mairan 1

Dome ,,•.-

2000

•-- Mairan2

--,--

Dome

Mairan Dome 3 ß,

,/,' '



/'

ß ,/ •'•',0' '

1500



/ ,•.'.."





1000









500 ' ' ' ' I ' ' ' ' I ' ' ' ' I ' ' ' ' [ ' ' ' ' I ' ' ' ' I



400 500 600 700 800 900 1000



Wavelength (nm)

and

Figure 17. The threeMairan domeshave higher reflectances steeperUV/VIS slopesthan the highland soils,

of

but their shapeis characteristic highland-likefeldspathicmaterialrather than mare.







material,which is also seenin the highland compared the surrounding

of feldspathic to highlands, their overall spectral

rocks. The highest albedo and lowest 415/750 value is

character more similar to highland material than to mare.

to on

corresponds freshimpactcraters the domes (Figure18, can

Their brighter appearance be explainedby steeperslopes

Highland Crater), as noted previously in telescopicdata causingmore masswasting and exposure of fresher surfaces.

[Chevrelet al., 1995]. Thesefreshcratersappeardarkblue on Their lower 415/750 ratios are more consistent with a mature

the ¾ domein Plate 2e, and their spectraresemblethat of soil, however. In summary,the Mairan and Gruithuisendomes

anorthosite[Tompkinsand Pieters, 1999]. Although the representnonmare material with an unusually high UV/VIS

domesdo have smaller415/750 values and higher albedos slope,perhaps due to lower titanium contents. However, it is





, , , , I , , , , I , , , , I , , , , I , , , , I , , , , I







I 3

3000 '7 Dome I

I'' ,x-- Dome 1(y) I

I '--I' -Highland Crater I

...,.l"

I •" Highlands I

2500 I -'0'" Mare I







2000 ,/ ./' .- ....

.....zx zx'''"x

j

./ / .ß

...... :_:.2:.._+._.--*

limaIll

1500

_.

I"' ./'

/ .--":5'""....'---

..-'..'.•'"

..-_'.5-: _........

.., :5,,.-' • •..o- .......

1000 ø'-;'"" -•' '







500 .... • ....

400 500 600 700 800 900 1000





Wavelength (nm)

Figure 18. The threeGruithuisendomes and UV/VIS slopes

alsohavehigherreflectances steeper than the highland

soils. The Highland was on

Craterspectrum takenfroma freshcrater the8 dome.

18,952 AND MARIUS VOLCANIC

WE1TZ HEAD: HILLS COMPLEX

clear that these domes could not be formed by the same On the basisof the spectralpropertieslisted in Table 1, the

eruption

styles emplaced othermare

that the domes studied domes of the Rumker Hills have the lowest 415/750 ratio and

in

thispaper.

Previousstudies HeadandMcCord

by [1978],Head therefore are the reddestfeature studiedin this paper, even

et al. [1978], and Malin [1974] show that the featuresare redderthan the Mairan and Gruithuisenhighland domes. The

morphologically spectrally

and fromthe highlands, AristarchusPlateauDMD is also very red and has a 750/950

distinct

suggesting they cannotsimplybe remnant

that highland value similar to the Rumker Hills. However, the red color of

Plateaumay be due to the high Ti content the

islandsbut also requirean explanationfor their spectral the Aristarchus of

Chevrel al. [1999] outlineevidence there volcanic glasses[Bell et al., 1976], while the red color of the

signature. et that

may be adjacent non-mareregions associated with this Rumker domes indicates a very low Ti content in the mare

volcanic style as well. [Pieters, 1978]. Additionally, the 750/950 nm value for the

Rumker Hills reflects the strength of the high-Ca pyroxene

absorptionin the mare, while the ratio indicates the presence

4.6 Spectral Comparison of Lunar Cones and in

of a glassband absorption the Aristarchus Plateau DMD. In

Domes

termsof reflectance,the Rumker Hills have the highest values

to

In order spectrally all

compare the conesanddomes in comparedto all the other mafic featuresstudied. The dome

this study,we have listedrepresentative ratiosand Grace in northern Tranquillitatis has a similar color and

spectral

reflectancevalues for these features(Table 1). All the ratio reflectance to the low-Ti domes in Marius Hills, as well as a

to

valueshave been corrected 30ø phaseangle to remove any mafic signaturecharacteristic mare soils. A low-Ti domeof

of

differences by

caused phase anglevariations [McEwen, 1996], Marius Hills has a 415/750 value similar to the high-Ti mare

and only those spectrathat did not show an erroneous of Serenitatis (22øN, 29øE), illustrating that the lowest

inflection at 950 nm are listed. We show the 750/950 values titanium mare units at Marius Hills are actually relatively high

rather than the 750/900 ratio because this is the more standard in titanium comparedto other lunar mare. An intermediate

ratio usedby the lunar sciencecommunity,and we want to color domeat Marius Hills has a slightly stronger mafic band

our

compare values those to by In to

taken others. addition the than both the low- and high-Ti domes. Except for the low-Ti

domesand cones studiedin this paper, we also show the dome, the domes at Marius Hills have lower reflectances than

spectralratiosof the TaurusLittrowandAristarchus Plateau other lunar domes and both Mare Serenitatis mare units.

darkmantle deposits(DMDs). The Taurus LittrowDMD refers The Rima Parry V cones are spectrally identical to their

to theregionaldeposit at edge

located thesoutheastern of Mare surrounding dark mantle deposit. Telescopic near-infrared

Serenitatis.Samples fromtheApollo 17 site, located reflectance

returned spectraof 25 localized dark mantle depositstaken

at theeastern of

edge theTaurus that

LittrowDMD, indicate the by Hawke et al. [1989] indicate three compositional groups,

deposit containssubmillimeter blackbeads

crystalline mixed depending upon their 1.0 gm absorption. ClementineUVVIS

of

with lesseramounts orangeglasses[Heiken et al., 1974; spectraconfirm the three co•npositional et

groups [Gaddis al.,

to

Pieterset al., 1974]. The black beadsare compositionally 1997]. After applyingan offset for comparison Clementine

to

equivalent the orange glasses wereproduced the spectra

and from by

obtained Gaddiset al. [1999], we find that the Rima

sameeruption,but the presence olivine and ilmenite Parry spectrafall betweengroups1 and2, with the 950/750

of

crystals reflects slower cooling rates [Arndt and von value matching that of group 2 (fragmentedbasaltic material)

Engelhardt, 1987]. Whereas Taurus

the Littrow DMD i s and the 415/750 ratio similar to that of group 1 (mixture of

spectrally by beads[Pieterset al., highlands and glassy juvenile material with smaller amounts

dominated crystallized

1973; Adamset al., 1974; Gaddis al., 1985; Hawkeet al., of basalt material). The Rima Parry cones and dark mantle

et

1990], Aristarchus Plateau dominated volcanicglasses have a 715/950 value similar to the Aristarchus Plateau DMD

is by

[Zisk et al., 1977; Luceyet al., 1986; McEwen al., 1994; but slightly bluer in color. One possibility is that the cones

et

Weitz et al., 1998]. and dark mantle are composedof glassy material, with the







Spectral

Table 1. Representative Ratiosand Reflectances

Feature 415/750* 750/950* %Reflectance at 750 nm



Marius Hills black cones 0.67 0.92 7.7

Mons Esam 0.66 0.91 8.6

MariusHills high-Ti dome 0.66 0.95 8.1

Osiris 0.66 0.94 9.0

Marius Hills intermediate dome 0.65 0.97 9.2

Taurus Littrow DMD 0.65 0.89 7.9

Mare Serenitatis

high-Ti 0.63 0.94 10.0

Marius Hills low-Ti dome 0.63 0.96 9.8

Diana 0.63 0.91 9.4

Grace 0.62 0.93 10.0

Marius Hills red cones 0.60 1.00 9.1

Mare Serenitatis low-Ti 0.60 0.94 10.3

Rima Parry 0.59 0.96 11.9

Gruithuisen dome 0.59 0.92 21.1

Mairan dome 0.58 0.92 21.7

Aristarchus Plateau DMD 0.54 0.96 10.5

Rurnker Hills 0.53 0.94 12.6



DMD, dark mantledeposit.

have normalized 30 phase

* Ratios been to ø angle.

WErlZ AND HE•: MARIUS HILLS VOLCANIC COMPLEX 18,953





difference color between glasses Aristarchus

in the at Plateau mafic and glass absorptionsaround1000 nm, assumingthat

and those at Rima Parry resulting from distinct titanium the cone flanks are a mixture of lava and glass-richspatter.

contents[Bell et al., 1976]. However,this hypothesiscannot

be determinedwith certainty becausethe spectra represent 5. Formation of Lunar Volcanic Features

whereas studies Bell et al. [1976] were

maturesurfaces, the by

forpure,freshvolcanic

glasses. theRimaParryglasses

If were In a manner similar to basaltic eruptions on Earth [Wilson

partially crystallized, they would plot closer to the Taurus and Head, 1981; Head and Wilson, 1989], a variety of volcanic

Littrow 750/950 value. Since they do not, we believe they features can form on the Moon, depending upon the

of

have a higherproportion glasses.The conesthemselves are accumulation of

rate and temperature the clasts. The highest

likely to be composed of glassy spatter to develop the fluxes, accumulationrates, and clast temperatures will tend to

constructs. A further examination of how they formed is form sinuous and

rilles. The high temperatures turbulentnature

discussed section 5. Rima Parry cones have the highest

in of the flows causethermal erosion of the underlying substrate

reflectances all the cones, although they are lower than the

of to form the rilles and their source depressions[Carr, 1973;

Rumker Hills domes. The cone Osiris has spectral ratios Hulme, 1973; Head and Wilson, 1980; Wilson and Head,

consistent with mare soils. 1980]. Clementine data show that the rilles expose fresh mare

To account the spectra the dark spots in Marius Hills

for of along their walls, consistent with layering visible in Apollo

of

that correspond cones (Table 1, Marius Hills black cones) 15 photographs Hadley rille [Howard et al., 1972]. As clast

to

requires material that will darken the soil and remove any temperatures

a and accumulation lava ponds and

rates decrease,

mafic signature, similar to the effect that agglutinatesproduce lava flows will result. Actual preserved do

pyroclasts not form

in lunar soils. On Earth, the flanks of basaltic volcanic cones until the clasts reach sufficiently low temperatures that they

are composed scoria, including spatter and cinder, and we can cool rapidly.

of

assume that the lunar cones are formed of similar scoria in Basaltic cones are common constructs on Earth. The cones



order to build up a cone. Basaltic spatter sometimes has a form around a vent and result from Hawaiian or strombolian

microcrystalline structure(microlites) becauseof a cooling style eruptions that commonly produceassociatedlava flows

rate that allowed nucleation of crystals but inhibited their [Wilson and Head, 1981; Head and Wilson, 1989]. Cinder

growth [Cas and Wright, 1988]. Glasses alsounstable

are over cones often have slopes related to the angle of repose for

time and can devitrify to form microlites,a commonprocess in cinder,and they have large cratersrelative to their basal width

obsidians on Earth [Lofgren, 1971] and thought to have [Wood, 1979]. Basaltic spatter cones form above dikes when

occurred the Apollo 17 orange glasses [Weitz et al., 1996].

in large clasts land hot but accumulate slowly so there is

Assuming that lunar spatterhas similar microlites, they would sufficient time to cool before the next clast lands.



have been crushedto fine-grained sizes during regolith On the Moon, lunar domes are thought to form from

formation and could act as a darkening agent to explain the relatively low eruption rates and low gas contents, both of

spectra for the dark spots. The cones of Mons Esam in which would tendto cause buildupof lava arounda vent. Lower

northern Tranquillitatis basin are similar to the cones of lava temperaturesleading to increased viscosity may also

Marius Hills, and their spectral signaturesindicate that they favor dome formation, rather than extensive mare flows.

too may have microlites to decrease reflectanceand mafic

the Domes can form from strombolianor Hawaiian eruptionswhen

absorption, as well as producea bluer color. Becausethe hot magma clasts are not accumulatingrapidly and there is

Marius Hills and Mons Esam cones have stronger mafic adequate time for the claststo cool and increasetheir viscosity

absorptions than the TaurusLittrow DMD, we suggest that before the next one is deposited. On Earth, low effusion rates

they developedfewer ilmenite crystals to allow a stronger formed the low shield Mauna Ulu in Hawaii [Swanson et al.,

mafic signatureto be identified. 1979], and lunar domes, like those of Rumker Hills and

The annularred spots(Table 1, Marius Hills red cones) that Northern Tranquillitatis, may have also resulted from low

correspond the cone flanks and surround

to some of the dark effusionrates,particularlyin the terminal phasesof eruptions

spots have a very strong mafic absorption and similar that emplacedthe mare.

415/750 nm ratios to the other mare units. They do not have The Marius Hills representa distinct type of domesowing

spectralratios that match any of the three groupsof localized to their somewhatsteeperslopesand roughersurfaces. If mare

dark mantle deposits[Gaddiset al., 1999]. Strombolian and lavas erupted over jagged highlands, then the rough

Hawaiian eruptions produce some fine ash and achneliths topography associatedwith the Marius Hills domes could be

(small glassyfragments, suchas Pele tears) that are glass-richexplained by thin mare overlying a rougher substrate.

andcan be carried farther away from the vents than the larger However, no underlying highlands are visible or exposed by

spatter. If submillimeter glass beads were producedduring impact craters,implying that the dome morphologyis a result

cone formation, then we should be able to identify these of the magmasthat composethem. Their morphology must

glasses looking for a glass absorptionsimilar to that seen

by thereforeresultfrom higher-viscosity magmas, shorter flows,

in dark mantle deposits composedof volcanic glass beads, or lower effusion rates. There are several processesthat can

suchas the Aristarchus Plateau. The Marius Hills red spots areincrease magma viscosity, including an increase in silica

bluer andhave a much stronger glassband absorption than the content, lower magma temperatures, and higher crystal

Aristarchus Plateau volcanic glasses. Bell et al. [1976] contents[Head et al., 1978]. It is unlikely that lunar magmas

determined that the color of volcanic glassesis a function of were able to differentiate to produce more evolved

their Ti and Fe contents. Therefore, assuming similar Fe compositions [Rutherford et al., 1974]. Lower eruption

contents, the redder color of Aristarchus Plateau volcanic temperaturesand higher crystal contents are expected in

glasses may reflect a higher Ti contentcompared the glasses magmas

to eruptedin the terminal stage of an eruption when the

on the coneflanks. The stronger mafic bandin the red spotsi s mass flux has decreased. Therefore we interpret the Marius

difficult to explain but may result from a combination of the Hills domes to represent the result of cooler, more viscous

18,954 WEITZ AND HEAD: MARIUS HILLS VOLCANIC COMPLEX



magmas eruptedduring the later phases of eruptions; these enoughto form only spatter. The morphologicaldifferences

domessubsequentlybecameembayedby younger, more fluid between Isis andOsirismay reflectthe locationalong the dike

mare lavas. wherethey formed,with Isis forming at one end whereclasts

Volcanic cones on Earth can be producedby Hawaiian, to

stayedhotterin an optically denseplume compared a lower

strombolian, and vulcanian style eruptions. Formation of in

optical density plume at Osiris. The differences plume

volcanic cones on the Moon requireshigh cooling rates that optical densitycouldbe from either a lower gas content or a

allow clasts to land cool enough to form spatter and cinder higher volume flux at Isis.

rather than lava. Cones must be composedof clasts that are

Mons Esam also has no visible dark mantle depositand

larger than submillimeter;otherwise,the clasts will be widely the of

more closelymatches spectralcharacteristics the Marius

dispersedto form dark mantle deposits [Wilson and Head, Hills volcanic cones,even thoughits morphologyis similar

1981]. Completely and partially weldedspatter will produce to the Rima Parry cones. The low reflectanceand weak mafic

volcanic cones, as will cinders. For terrestrial cones, spatter

of

signature the Mons Esamconesimplies a similar cooling

and cinder are both producedfrom the same fragmentation historyto the clasts namely,

that form the MariusHills cones;

processat the vent, but the larger size of spatter allows it to clasts to

thatformedspatter developa coneandsomecooling

cool more slowly and form irregular shapes, while cinder is in the clasts to form microlites. The lack of associated dark

smaller scoria that is deposited as a solid. Lunar volcanic mantle deposits at both Mons Esam and Marius Hills cones

cones most likely formed either at the end of eruptions when that in large

indicates gasbubbles the magmaweresufficiently

of

eruptionrateswere lower or by degassing near-surface dikes to form only largerclasts duringfragmentation. The conesat

[Headand Wilson, 1993]. Many lunar cones, like those in Rima Parry V, Isis, Osiris, and Mons Esam are aligned

Marius Hills and Isis, have associated small lava flows,

linearly, but no alignment is recognizablefor the cones in

indicating that some clasts landed hot and could coalesceto Marius Hills. This observation suggeststhat the cones at

form flows.

the

Marius Hills represent terminal stagesof earliereruptions

Wood [1979] found that average terrestrial cinder cones dueto decreasing massfluxes. Nearthe endof the eruptions,

were produced from magma chambers at depths of -3 km, the magma risespeed mayhave decreased sufficientlyto allow

whereaslarger cones couldhave sourcedepths at the base of gas bubbles to coalesce into larger bubbles, which would

the crust (-40 km). He suggestedthat the smaller volume for subsequently to

burstat the surface producespatteror cinder.

lunar conesimplies either lower effusion rates from shallower is of

This styleof eruption characteristic strombolian activity

magma chambersor high eruption rates from brief eruptions on Earth.

[Wood,1979]. In termsof volume, Osiris is 0.13 km3, the the

The MariusHills complexillustrates varietyof volcanic

larger in

cones Marius Hills are0.5-0.8 km3, andcinder cones features can form on the Moon. The high concentration

that of

in Arizonaare0.2-0.4 km3 [HeadandWilson, 1979]. On the sinuous

rilles, domes,and conessuggests somethingunusual

basis of morphometricrelations, Wood [1979] proposedthat aboutthisregioncompared the rest of the Moon [Whitford-

to

Isis and Osiris representedcinder cones, while three cones in Starkand Head, 1977]. Crustalthicknesscalculated Zuber

by

the Marius Hills region were equivalent to terrestrial shield no

et al. [1994] showed unusuallythin crust here that would

volcanoes. However, Head and Wilson [1991] outlines

at to on

favor eruptions this location compared elsewhere the

evidencethat shallow magma reservoirsshouldbe very rare on Moon. One possibility to accountfor the presenceof these

the Moon because of the density trap at the base of the is

volcanic features an anomalous crust,and perhapsmantle,

anorthositic crust. This densitytrap preventedabundantdikes has

beneaththe region. Recently, LunarProspector measured

from stalling in one location in the shallow crust, which is high concentrations of Th in OceanusProcellamm and Mare

on

requiredto form shieldvolcanoes Earth. The smallersize of et

Imbrium [Lawrence al., 1999]. This region, termedthe

lunar volcanoesimplies that there were fewer eruptions or one Lunar Hot Spot,is believed to have formed before the Imbrium

long eruption that could build up a small shield. Lower impact [Korotev, 1999]. Marius Hills is located toward the

effusion rates would have prevented lavas from traveling far center of the Procellarum basin, and its centralized location

from the vent, which would favor dome formation.

may have resultedin the unusualvolcanism seen here. There

In the case of Isis, Osiris, Mons Esam, and Rima Parry V, are several different compositions for the mare units in the

the cones most likely formed along a rille by degassingof a are

complex,indicatingthat severalmagmasources required,

near-surface dike [Head and Wilson, 1996]. At a certain depth Ti we

eachwith a different content. In summary, proposethat

below the surface, the dike will causeenough extension to the Marius Hills Complex formed by numerous dikes

produce a graben. If the dike is shallow enough, then to and

propagating the surface eruptinglavasthat produced

of

degassing the dike can occurand pyroclastic cones will be extensive mare units at high mass effusion rates. At the

produced. Head and Wilson [1993] have calculatedthat the terminal stagesof these eruptions, the mass flux decreased,

dike at Rima Parry V had a width of-150 m andwas locatedat a

resulting in the formation of the domesby increased

depthof-650 m. Rima Parry V has an associated dark mantle

in and

crystallization the magmas decreasing temperatures,and

deposit that is spectrally similar to DMDs composed of by

the cones explosive activityfromhighervolatile contents

volcanic glasses. Therefore, at Rima Parry, the erupted in the latter stages the eruptions.

of

submillimeter clasts formed a thin blanket of debris, which

becamethe DMD, while the larger clastsresultedin spatterthat 6. Conclusions

built up the cones. Isis and Osiris may not have similar dark

mantle deposits because(1)they have been embayed by properties the lunar domes and conescan be

The spectral of

youngermare that wouldhave coveredthem up or (2) little or summarized as follows:

no fine-grained in

clastswereproduced the eruptions. Isis is mareunitsin the Marius Hills complex

1. Thereare several

to

breached the northindicating an

that it produced associated andthe widerangeof titanium contentsin theseunits argues

lava flow whereclastswere hot enoughafter landing to for multiple eruptionsfrom severaldistinct source regions at

coalesceand form lava, while at Osiris, all clasts landedcold depth. The domes Marius Hills are spectrally

at to

identical the

WEITZ AND HEAD: MARIUS HILLS VOLCANIC COMPLEX 18,955





adjacent mare and occur in both the high- and low-Ti mare Bell, P.M., H. K. Mao, and R. A. Weeks, Optical spectraand electron

units. The cones are spectrally distinct from the mare and paramagnetic of

resonance lunarand synthetic A

glasses: studyof the

effectsof controlled atmosphere, and temperature,Proc.

composition,

domeswith lower reflectances,weaker mafic absorptions, and Lunar Sci. Conf., 7th, 2543-2559, 1976.

bluer colors. The spectral properties of the cones are Carr, M. H., The role of lava erosion in the formation of lunar rilles and

consistent with spatter that has some fine-grained martian channels, Icarus, 22, 1-23, 1973.

crystallization. 528

Cas,R. A. F., andJ. V. Wright, VolcanicSuccessions, pp., Chapman

and Hall, London, UK, 1988.

2. The cones Isis and Osiris are spectrally similar to the

Charette, M.P., T. B. McCord, C. M. Pieters, and J. B. Adams,

adjacentmare units. Applicationof remote spectralreflectance measurements lunarto

3. The Rima Parry V cones may represent glassy spatter geologyclassification of

and determination titaniumcontentof lunar

whereastheir associated dark mantledepositmay be composed soils,J. Geophys. Res., 79, 1605-1613, 1974.

of volcanic glassessimilar to those found at the Aristarchus Chevrel, S. D., P. C. Pinet, J. W. Head, and F. Bellagh, UV-VIS-NIR

in

spectralclassification the Gruithuisendomes region (abstract),

Plateau,but with higher titanium contents. Lunar Planet. Sci., XXVI, 241-242, 1995.

4. The Mons Esam cones of northern Mare Tranquillitatis Chevrel,S. D., P. C. Pinet,andJ. W. Head, GruithuisenDomes region:A

were erupted concurrently with the high-Ti mare at this candidate for an extended non-mare volcanism unit on the Moon, J.

location and are spectrally similar to those at Marius Hills. Geophys. Res., in press,1999.

Cintala,M. J., andR. A. F. Grieve, The effects of differential scalingof

The domesof northern Mare Tranquillitatis, including Grace

on

impactmelt and crater dimensions lunar and terrestrialcraters:

and an unnameddome, are spectrallysimilar to the low-Ti mare Some brief examples, in Large Meteorite Impacts and Planetary

in the region. The dome Diana has an intermediate color Evolution,edited by B. O. Dressier, R. A. F. Grieve, and V. L.

betweenthe high- and low-Ti mare units. Sharpton, Geol. Soc.Am. Spec.Pap. 293, 51-59, 1994.

5. The domesof RumkerHills are spectrallyidenticalto the Coombs,C. R., B. R. Hawke, P. G. Lucey,P. D. Owensby,and S. H. Zisk,

The Alphonsus Region:A geologicremote-sensing perspective,Proc.

very low-Ti mare that is also on the Rumker Hills. Lunar Planet. Sci. Conf., 20th, 161-174, 1990.

6. The Mairan and Gruithuisen domes are spectrally similar Dunkin, S. K., and D. J. Heather,The MariusHills Volcanic Complex:A

to the adjacenthighland soils except that they are redderand stratigraphicstudy.In Lunar and Planetary Science XXX, Abstract

have higherreflectances.They are not mare domesbut instead #1180, Lunarand Planetary Institute,Houston(CD-ROM), 1999.

Fischer,E. M., and C. M. Pieters, Remote determination of exposure

have a highland-likesignature.

degree and iron concentration of lunar soils using VIS-NIR

The formation of the volcanic constructs studied in this

spectroscopic methods, Icarus,111,475-488, 1994.

paper is interpretedas follows: of

Gaddis,L. R., C. M. Pieters,and B. R. Hawke, Remote sensing lunar

Domes: The flatter (<3 ø) mare domesformed at low effusion pyroclastic mantling deposits, Icarus,61, 461-489, 1985.

rates that would allow a small shield to develop. The steep- Gaddis,L. R., A. S. McEwen, andT. L. Becker, Compositional variations

of

on the Moon: Recalibration Galileo solid-state imagingdata for the

sideddomesat Marius Hills suggestvery low mass fluxes at Orientale region and farside, J. Geophys.Res., i00, 26,345-26,355,

cooler temperaturesand with high crystallization contents, 1995.

perhapsat the terminal stagesof the eruptions that emplaced Gaddis,L. R., M. Robinson, B. Ray Hawke, Analysesof three small

and

the earlier mare and flatter domes. classesof small lunar pyroclasticdepositswith Clementine data

(abstract),Lunar Planet. Sci., XXVIII, 389-390, 1997.

Cones: The Rima Parry cones are aligned linearly, parallel Gaddis, L. R., B. R. Hawke, M. S. Robinson, and C. R. Coombs, Juvenile

to an adjacentgraben, and are interpreted to have formed by in deposits. Lunarand PlanetaryScience

materials lunarpyroclastic In

degassingof a near-surface dike producingboth spatter and XXX, Abstract #1732, Lunar and Planetary Institute, Houston (CD-

volcanic glassesbut no associated lava flows. Other cones, ROM), 1999.

such as Isis, Osiris, and Mons Esam, are aligned linearly, Gillis, J. J., and P. D. Spudis,Clementine of

color mosaics Procellarum

Volcanic Complexes: for

Evidence domemorphology linkedto volatile

supporting eruptions from near-surfacedikes that did not

contentand eruptions rate (abstract),Lunar Planet. Sci., XXVI, 459-

emplacedark mantle deposits. The Marius Hills cones show 460, 1995.

to

no similar alignment and are therefore considered be from in

Greeley,R., Lava tubesand channels the lunar Marius Hills, Moon, 3,

strombolian activity marking the transition from effusive 289-314, 1971.

eruptionsthatproduced mare and domesto more explosive

the Guest,J. E., Centresof igneousactivity in the maris, in Geologyand

of

Geophysics the Moon, edited by G. Fielder, pp. 41-53, Elsevier,

cone-forming activity at the terminal stages of these New York, 1971.

eruptions. Guest, J. E., and B. J. Murray, Volcanic features of the nearside

equatoriallunar maria, J. Geol. Soc.London,i32, 251-258, 1976.

Acknowledgments. This research was supported by a NASA L.

Hawke, B. R., C. R. Coombs, R. Gaddis,P. G. Lucey, and P. D.

GraduateResearch Program Grant to C. W. and NASA Grant NAG5- Owensby, Remote sensingand geologic studiesof localized dark

4723 from the Planetary Geology and GeophysicsProgram to J. H. on

mantledeposits the Moon, Proc. Lunar Planet.Sci. Conf.,19th, 255-

Special thanks CarlePieters helpfuldiscussions Peter Neivert

to for and 268, 1989.

for photographic Thoughtful constructive

assistance. and reviewsby B. Hawke, B. R., C. R. Coombs, and B. Clark, Ilmenite-richpyroclastic

Ray Hawkeand Alfred McEwen have greatlyimproved qualityof

the An Proc. Lunar Planet. Sci. Conf.,20th,

deposits: ideal lunarresource,

this paper. 249-258, 1990.

Head, J. W., and A. Gifford, Lunar mare domes: Classification and

mode, Moon Planets',22,235-258, 1980.

References on

Head, J. W., and T. B. McCord, Imbrian-age highlandvolcanism the

Moon: The Gruithuisenand Mairan Domes, Science, 199, 1433-1436,

Adams,J. B., C. Pieters,and T. B. McCord, Orange glass:Evidencefor 1978.

regional of

deposits pyroclastic originon the Moon, Proc. Lunar Sci. Head, J. W., and L. Wilson, Alphonsus-typedark-halo craters:

Conf, 5th, 171-186, 1974. Morphology,morphometry, and eruptionsconditions, Proc. Lunar

Arndt, J., and W. von Engelhardt, Formation Apollo 17 orange and

of Planet. Sci. Conf loth, 2861-2897, 1979.

blackglass J.

beads, Geophys. Res.,92, 372-376, 1987. of

Head,J. W., andL. Wilson,The formation erodeddepressions around

Bailey, R.A., G. B. Dalrymple, and M. A. Lanphere, Volcanism, the sources of lunar sinuous rilles: Observations, Proc. Lunar Planet.

of

structure,and geochronology Long Valley, Mono Co CA, J. Sci. Conf 11th, 426-428, 1980.

Geophys. Res., 81,725-744, 1976. Head, J. W., and L. Wilson, Basalticpyroclasticeruptions: Influence of

Bell, J. F., andB. R. Hawke,The ReinerGammaFormation: Composition gas-release patternsand volume fluxes on fountainstructure,and the

andorigin as derived from remote sensing Proc. Lunar

observations, formationof cinder cones,spattercones,rootlessflows, lava ponds

Planet. Sci. Conf., 12B, 679-694, 1981. and lava flows, J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res., 37, 261-271, 1989.

18,956 WEITZ AND HEAD: MARIUS HILLS VOLCANIC COMPLEX





Head, J. W., and L. Wilson, Absence of large shield volcanoesand Pieters, M., J. B. Adams,P. Mouginis-Mark,S. H. Zisk, J. W. Head, T.

C.

on of

calderas the Moon: Consequence magma transportphenomena, B. McCord,andM. Smith,The nature of crater rays: The Copernicus

Geopyhs. Res.Lett., 18, 2121-2124, 1991. example,J. Geophys. Res.,90, 12,393-12,413,1985.

Head, J. W., and L. Wilson, Lunar mare volcanism: Stratigraphy, Pieters, M., E. M. Fischer,O. Rode, and A. Basu,Optical effects of

C.

eruptionconditions, and the evolutionof secondarycrusts,Geochim. spaceweathering: Res.,98,

The role of the finest fraction,J. Geophys.

Cosmochim.Acta, 56, 2155-2175, 1992. 20,817-20,824, 1993a.

Head, J. W., and L. Wilson, Lunar grabenformationdue to near-surface C. diversity the Moon:Compositional

Pieters, M. et al., Crustal of analyses

deformation accompanying dike emplacement, Planet. Space.Sci., 41, of Galileo solid state imagingdata, J. Geophys.Res., 98, 17,127-

719-727, 1993. 17,148, 1993b.

Head, J. W. and L. Wilson, Lunar linear rilles as surface manifestations Pieters, C. M., J. F. Mustard, and J. M. Sunshine,Quantitative mineral

of dikes: Predictions and observations,Lunar Planet, Sci., XXVII, 519- analysesof planetary surfaces using reflectance spectroscopy, in

520, 1996. A

Mineral Spectroscopy: Tributeto Roger G. Burns, editedby M.D.

Head, J. W., P. C. Hess, and T. B. McCord, Geologic characteristics of Dyar, C. McCammon,and M. W. Scafer,pp. 307-325, Geochem. Soc.,

lunar highland volcanism (Gruithuisen and Marian region) and Houston, Tex., 1996.

possible eruptionconditions, Proc. Lunar Planet. Sci. Conf 9th, 488- Pinet, P. C., V. V. Shevchenko, and S. Chevrel, Reiner Gamma Formation

489, 1978. UVVIS spectro-imaging

from Clementine data:The lunar chronology

Heiken, G. H., D. S. McKay, and R. W. Brown, Lunar depositsof and iron content (abstract), Lunar Planet. Sci., XXVIII, 1115-1116,

Acta, 38, 1703-

possiblepyroclasticorigin, Geochim. Cosmochim. 1997.

1718, 1974. M.

Rutherford, J., P. C. Hess,and G. H. Daniel, Experimental liquidline

Hess, P. C., and E. M. Parmentier,Asymmetry and timing of mare of descentand liquid immiscibilityfor basalt 70017, Proc. Lunar

volcanism.In Lunar and Planetary Science XXX, Abstract #1360, Planet. Sci. Conf., 5th, 569-583, 1974.

Lunar and PlanetaryInstitute,Houston(CD-ROM), 1999. Scott,D. H., Mare Serenitatis cinder cones and terrestrialanalogs,in

Hulme, G., Turbulent lava flows and the formation of lunar sinuous rilles, Apollo 17 Preliminary ScienceReport, NASA SP-330, 30-7 to 30-8,

Mod. Geol., 4, 107-117, 1973. 1973.

Howard, K. A., J. W. }lead, and G. A. Swann, Geology of Hadley Rille, Smith,E. I., Rumker Hills: A lunar volcanic dome complex,Moon, I0,

Proc. Lunar. Sci. Conf, 3rd, 1-14, 1972. 175-181, 1974.

Korotev, R. L., The "Great Lunar Hot Spot" and the composition and Basalt

Staid,M. I., C. M. Pieters,and J. W. Head, Mare Tranquillitatis:

origin of the "LKFM" impact melt. In Lunar and Planetary Science emplacement J.

historyand relation to lunar samples, Geophys. Res.,

XXX, Abstract#1305, Lunar and Planetary Institute,Houston(CD- I01, 23,213-23,228, 1996.

ROM), 1999. Sunshine, J. M., C. M. Pieters, and J. W. Head, New evidence for

Kuntz, M. A., D. E. Champion,R. H. Lefebvre, and H. R. Covington, compositional diversity at Marius Hills from Galileo multi-spectral

Geologicmap of the Cratersof the Moon, KingsBowl, and Wapi lava imaging, pp.

Ph.D. dissertation, 1-53, BrownUniv., Providence, 1994.

fields, and the great rift volcanicrift zone, south-central Idaho, U.S. Swanson, D. A., W. A. Duffield, D. B. Jackson, and D. W. Peterson,

Geol. Surv.Map, 1-1632, 1994. Chronological narrative of the 1969-71 Mauna Ulu eruption of

Lawrence,D. J., W. C. Feldman,B. L. Barraclough,A. B. Binder, R. C. Kilauea volcano, Hawaii, U.S. Geol. Surv. Prof Pap. 1056, 55 pp.,

Elphic, S. Maurice,M. C. Miller, andT. H. Prettyman, Delineatingthe 1979.

major KREEP-bearing terranes on the Moon with global Tompkins, and C. M. Pieters, S., Mineralogyof the lunar crust:Results

measurements of absolute Thorium abundances. In Lunar and from Clementine,Meteorol. Planet. Sci., 34, 25-41, 1999.

PlanetaryScience XXX, Abstract#2024, Lunar and Planetary Institute, Weitz, C. M., J. W. Head,andD. S. McKay, Eruptionand emplacement

Houston (CD-ROM), 1999. of lunar pyroclasticglassesas inferred from the 74001/2 section

Lofgren,G., Experimentally produced devitrification

textures natural

in (abstract), Lunar Planet, Sci., XXVII, 1413-1414, 1996.

rhyoliticglass,Geol. Soc.Ant. Bull., 82, 111-124, 1971. Weitz, C. M., J. W. Head,andC. M. Pieters,Lunar regionaldark mantle

Lucey, P. G., B. R. Hawke, C. M. Pieters,J. W. Head, andT. B. McCord, deposits: Geologic, and

multispectral, modeling J.

studies, Geophys.

A compositional studyof the Aristarchus region of the Moon using Res, 103, 22,725-22,760, 1998.

near-infrared reflectancespectroscopy, Proc. Lunar Planet.Sci. Conf Whitford-Stark, J. L., and J. W. Head, The Procellarum volcanic

16th,Part 2, J. Geophys. Res.,91, suppl.,

D344-D354, 1986. complexes: Contrasting stylesof volcanism, Proc. Lunar Planet. Sci.

Lucey,P. G., D. T. Blewett,and B. Ray Hawke, Mappingthe FeO and Conf, 8th, 2705-2724, 1977.

TiO 2 contentof the lunar surface with multispectral imagery, J. Whitford-Stark,J. L., and J. W. Head, Stratigraphyof Oceanus

Geophys. Res., 103, 3679-3699, 1998. Procellarum basalts:Sources J.

and stylesof emplacement, Geophys.

Malin, M. C., Lunarred spots: Possiblepre-marematerials,Earth Planet. Res., 85, 6579-6609, 1980.

Sci. Lett., 21,331-341, 1974. Wilhelms,D. E., The geologichistory of the Moon, U.S. Geol. Surv.

McCauley,J. F., Geologic mapof theHeveliusregionof the Moon, U.S. Prof Pap. 1348, 302 pp., 1987.

Geol. Surv.Misc. Geol. Invest.Map 1-491, 1967. Wilson,L. andJ. W. Head, The formation erodedof around

depressions

J.

McCauley, F., Geologicresults from the lunarprecursor probes, Am. of

the sources lunar sinuous rilles:Theory, LunarPlanet. Sci. Conf,

Inst. Aeronaut. Astronaut., 6, 1991-1996, 1968. Ilth, 1260-1262, 1980.

of

McCauley, J. F., The domesand cones in the Marius Hills region- Wilson,L., and J. W. Head, Ascentand eruption basalticmagmaon

Evidence for lunar differentiation?,EOS Trans. AGU, 50, 229, 1969. the Earth and Moon, J. Geophys. Res., 86, 2971-3001, 1981.

McEwen, A. S., A preciselunar photometric function(abstract),Lunar Wood, C. A., Monogenetic volcanoesof the terrestrialplanets,Proc.

Planet. Sci., XXVII, 841-842, 1996. Lunar Planet. Sci. Conf, loth, 2815-2840, 1979.

H. T.

McEwen, A. S., M. S. Robinson, M. Eliason,P. G. Lucey, T. C. Zisk,S. H., C. A. Hodges, J. Moore,R. W. Shorthill, W. Thompson,

E.

Duxbury,and P. D. Spudis,Clementine observations the Aristarchus

of E. A. Whitaker, and D. E. Wilhelms, The Aristarchus-Harbinger

regionof the Moon, Science, 266, 1858-1862, 1994. regionof the Moon: Surface geologyand historyfrom recentremote

McGetchin, T. R., and J. W. Head, Lunar cinder cones,Science, 180, 68- sensing observations,Moon, 17, 59-99, 1977.

71, 1973. Zuber, M. T., D. E. Smith, F. G. Lemoine, and G. A. Neumann, The

Melosh,H. J., ImpactCratering,245 pp., OxfordUniv. Press,New York, of

shapeand internal structure the moon from the Clementinemission,

1989. Science,266, 1839-1843, 1994.

Murase,T., andA. R. McBirney, Viscosityof lunar lavas,Science,167,

1491-1493, 1970.

Pieters,C. M., Mare basalttypeson the front side of the Moon, Proc. J. W. Head III, Department of Geological Sciences,Brown

Lunar Planet. Sci. Conf, 9th, 2825-2849, 1978. University, RI

Box 1846,Providence, 02912.

Pieters, T. B. McCord,S. H. Zisk,andJ. B. Adams,Lunar black spots

C., Laboratory,

C. M. Weitz, National ResearchCouncil, Jet Propulsion

and the nature of the Apollo 17 landingarea, J. Geophys.Res., 78, MS 183-335, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, CA 91109.

5867-5875, 1973. go

( cweitz@jpl.nasa. v)

Pieters, C. M., T. B. McCord, M. P. Charette, and J. B. Adams, Lunar

Identification the dark mantling

surface: of materialin the Apollo 17 (ReceivedOctober13, 1998;revisedApril 8, 1999;

soil samples,Science,183, 1191-1194, 1974. acceptedApril 15, 1999.)



Other docs by xiaoyounan
AUSRANK2011W
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
G117464796
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
absolutist_vs_constitutionalist
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Seminar_10_12_2011
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Excel-Tool Potentialanalyse VDA-6.3-2010_en
Views: 1  |  Downloads: 0
07sanin-ballot-hirei
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
DOGs
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
smith-waterman_NDSS
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
t31c015
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
2011-02-13_sermon
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
By registering with docstoc.com you agree to our
privacy policy

You are almost ready to download!

You are almost ready to download!