Acrobat PDF

SACRAMENTO WOMAN PLEADS GUILTY TO HIJACKING ONLINE BANK ACCOUNT

You must be logged in to download this document
Reviews
Shared by: dea
Stats
views:
7
rating:
not rated
reviews:
0
posted:
9/2/2008
language:
English
pages:
0
McGREGOR W. SCOTT United States Attorney Eastern District of California NEWS RELEASE Fresno 2500 Tulare St., Suite 4401 Fresno, CA 93721 Tel (559) 497-4000 TTY (559) 497-4500 Contact: Mary Wenger 916 554­ 2700 http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/cae Sacram ento 501 I Street, Suite 10-100 Sacramento, CA 95814 Tel 916/554-2700 TTY 916/554-2877 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE October 29, 2007 SACRAMENTO WOMAN PLEADS GUILTY TO HIJACKING ONLINE BANK ACCOUNT SACRAMENTO--United States Attorney McGregor W. Scott announced today that SHARON D. RICHARDS, 43, of Sacramento, pleaded guilty today to bank fraud and computer fraud before United States District Judge William B. Shubb. The case is the product of a joint investigation by the United States Postal Inspection Service and the Sacramento Police Department’s Financial Crimes Unit. The case is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Matthew D. Segal of the U.S. Attorney’s Computer Hacking and Intellectual Property (CHIP) unit. According to Assistant United States Attorney Segal, the case began when the victim’s purse was stolen. RICHARDS then used checks and information from the purse to buy a car and use the victim’s online bank account to order credit cards and issue over $202,450.00 in checks to various persons. The defendant was arrested while driving a Nissan 350Z that she had bought with one of the victim’s checks. The defendant is scheduled to be sentenced by Honorable William B. Shubb on January 18, 2008, at 8:30 a.m.. The maximum statutory penalty for bank fraud is 30 years of incarceration and a $1 million fine. The maximum statutory penalty for computer fraud is five years of incarceration and a $250,000 fine. However, the actual sentence will be determined at the discretion of the court after consideration of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines, which take into account a number of variables, and any applicable statutory sentencing factors.

Related docs
premium docs
Other docs by dea
cr160
Views: 96  |  Downloads: 0
Why German is For You
Views: 553  |  Downloads: 20
Gruen v Gruen
Views: 835  |  Downloads: 6
de147s
Views: 85  |  Downloads: 0
Acquisition by capture
Views: 136  |  Downloads: 0
adopt226
Views: 135  |  Downloads: 0
ch100
Views: 141  |  Downloads: 1
As the Deer Thirsts
Views: 264  |  Downloads: 1
dv200
Views: 171  |  Downloads: 0
de166
Views: 115  |  Downloads: 0
Sanctuary
Views: 194  |  Downloads: 3
Acquisition by capture
Views: 167  |  Downloads: 1
Herbs for Labor
Views: 601  |  Downloads: 8
Atlantic Ryan Bartolone
Views: 207  |  Downloads: 0
Engineering Principles for IT Security
Views: 386  |  Downloads: 20