Embed
Email

MSU - NOAA

Document Sample

Shared by: ajizai
Categories
Tags
Stats
views:
0
posted:
12/19/2011
language:
pages:
14
Consistent MSU Radiance Dataset for Reanalysis





Cheng-Zhi Zou



NOAA/NESDIS/Center for Satellite Applications and research









CFSRR First Advisory Board Meeting, NOAA Science Center, November 7, 2007

NOAA MSU Satellites

 4 channels to measure the

atmospheric temperature profiles



 No cloud contamination



 Each satellite has

a life cycle of a few years

Satellite Local Equator Crossing Time (LECT)

 Each satellite overlaps vs time

With other satellites—good for bias

correction



 LECT gradually changes

With time–

orbital drift phenomenon





MSU Scan Pattern and footprint sizes

Time series based on

pre-launch calibrated radiance data

 Different bias correction

yield different trend results

(Christy and Spenser,

Mears and Wentz,

Vinnikov and Grody,

Zou et al.)

 Reanalysis has its own

bias correction procedure,

how to ensure the

reanalysis trend to

represent the real

atmospheric trend?

Simultaneous Nadir Overpass



Method to find SNO matchups:



 Use Cao’s (2004) method

to find the orbits that

have intersections



 Use time and location

information in the 1B

Schematic viewing the overpasses

file to determine between two NOAA satellites

simultaneity between

two pixels

SNO Locations

MSU In-Orbit Calibration Process





Cold Space

T=2.73K

MSU Sensor









Warm Target

Temperature is

measured by PRT

Earth



Conceptual diagram of MSU observational procedure

Level 0 Calibration





(Cw, Rw)

(Ce, Re)

Radiance (R)







Onboard Warm Target

(Ce, RL)







Earth View

(Cc , 2.73K)

Cosmic Cold Target



Digital Counts (C)

SNO Radiance Error Model

Rk  RL ,k  Rk   k Z k

R j  RL , j  R j   j Z j

k j



Radiance Error Model for SNO Matchup

K and J :



R  RL  R   k Z k   j Z j



 Consider colinearity between Zk and Zj

 choose the coefficients that completely remove the

warm target temperature contamination

Tb comparison for SNO matchups









After pre-launch calibration After SNO calibration

Comparison Between Pre-launch

and SNO calibration



Time series

differences for

pre-launch

calibration Std=0.1K





Inter-satellite

differences

after SNO std=0.04K

calibration

Anomaly time series

Independent validation dataset for reanalysis

Website address:

http://www.orbit.nesdis.noaa.gov/smcd/emb/mscat/mscatmain.htm

Datasets available:



 Level 2 radiance:

 pre-launch (operationally) calibrated

 SNO calibrated

 Level 3 SNO calibrated gridded products: 2.502.50

 pentad T2, T3, and T4, 1987-present

 pentad anomaly T2, T3, and T4, 1987-present

 monthly T2, T3, and T4, 1987-present

 monthly anomaly T2, T3, and T4,1987-present

Trend patterns



T3 trend









T23, Mid-tropospheric temperature

trend, 1987-2006



T4, Lower

Stratospheric

temperature trend

1987-2006

Remaining issues



• Efforts needed to resolve short overlap problem

between NOAA 10 and 9 for accurate bias removal



• more calibration coefficients (higher order calibration

equation) maybe needed to solve Channel 3 for

NOAA 11 and 12



• Different frequencies between MSU and AMSU



Related docs
Other docs by ajizai
Resume 1.docx _20K_ - Student of Fortune
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
msg00000
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Pre-Tax Return Calculator 2010-2011
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Excel file - The GEO-3 Data Compendium
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Cooperators Tests - ARS
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
2010101473142104
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
AJHL - Shawn Stewart Sales
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
OBLATES_ BROTHER CADFAEL AND ROME
Views: 1  |  Downloads: 0
DuaneChipKeeler_CV-Resume
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
AIT-2009-291-SC
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
By registering with docstoc.com you agree to our
privacy policy

You are almost ready to download!

You are almost ready to download!