FORM 7 MONTHLY PROGRESS REPORT Report on Business

							                                        FORM 7 
                                MONTHLY PROGRESS REPORT 

Name of CNSX Issuer:                                     RT Minerals Corp. (the “Issuer”)
Trading Symbol:                                          RTM
Number of Outstanding Listed Securities:                 8,600,000
Date:                                                    August 7, 2009


 Report on Business 
1.     RT Minerals Corp. is a BC and Ontario reporting issuer that became publicly listed on the
       CNQ (now CNSX) on August 26, 2008 via an IPO and prospectus offering dated July 17,
       2008.
       The Issuer is a junior natural resource company engaged in the business of exploring for
       and developing mineral properties. Pursuant to an option agreement the Issuer has the
       exclusive right, title and interest to the mineral rights to the Godbout Uranium property
       near Baie-Comeau, Quebec.
       The Issuer completed its work program and general exploration of the Godbout Property,
       in accordance with the initial phase of work outlined in the Issuer’s Prospectus dated July
       17, 2008. No other activities occurred in June 2009.
       On August 6, 2009 the Issuer acquired an option on a gold prospect in Timmins, Ontario
       contiguous to the land holdings of West Timmins Mining Inc. and Lakeshore Gold Corp., near
       Timmins, Ontario.

       On and following July 1, 2009 the Issuer commenced the execution of subscription agreements for
       a private placement unit offering of up to 5,000,000 units at $0.05 per unit for proceeds of
       $250,000 to the Issuer. Each unit consists of one common share at $0.05 and one warrant attached
       to each share. One full warrant entitles the holder to acquire one further share of the Issuer at $0.05
       per share for a one year term. Funds have been received for the private placement and the
       placement will close on or before August 12, 2009.

2.     Management was actively engaged in all general and sundry administrative duties were
       carried out by the management of the Company. No other activities were carried out in
       July 2009.
3.     No field work has been completed in July 2009 following the Issuer completing the initial
       Phase 1 work on the Godbout Uranium property as reported in January 2009. The
       Godbout uranium prospect consists of 62 claims located about 60km east of Baie-Comeau,
       Quebec. The 2008 program consisted of ground reconnaissance and sampling in order to
       confirm the 41 airborne anomalies and targets detailed in the 2007 and 2008 airborne
       radiometric, magnetic and related surveys undertaken by RTM.
       This is the very first field program to be carried out by RT Minerals on their property, and
       as planned by the Company, it was only aimed at a preliminary assessment of its potential.
       The work was carried out in two phases due to moose hunting season. The first phase took
       place from September 8 to 26, and the second from October 14 to 21. It should be noted
that RT Minerals suspended work before the program was completed primarily due the
lack of obvious and large uranium anomalies and the collapse of the Uranium market.
RT Minerals agreed to have the work done in two phases based on the recommendations
of the property’s Qualified Person (“QP”) and the supervisor of the field program who has
authored the Assessment Report of April 30, 2009 which is summarized herein. The Field
Supervisor (“FS”) is a Qualified Person with a P.Geo. designation in the Province of
Quebec.
The first phase of work (2008) consisted of very detailed ground spectrometer sweeps of
airborne anomalies from an earlier survey (EON, 2007, GM 63627), to identify the exact
source of the anomaly. The interpretation provided by the airborne survey operator
indicates at least 32 anomalous zones scattered throughout the property. These are all
small zones of less than 0.05 km2. Twelve of them (designated by the letters A to L in the
assessment report) were selected as the most interesting (based on the airborne survey
operator’s interpretation), and RT Minerals asked CPDM to prioritize them.
More precisely, a detailed sweep consists of GPS-assisted zigzagged passes by a person
holding an RS-125 spectrometer, within a 20-metre wide corridor aligned either north-
south or east-west defined by the UTM grid. The spectrometer was consistently pointed
downward and held a few decimetres above the ground. Spectrometer readings of 80 ppm
U (about 1,000 cps) or more were recorded. In this program, four people carried out the
sweeps of the anomalies, advancing side by side within their respective UTM corridors,
with a geologist following behind to immediately assess the pertinence of any discovery.
Before work was halted, 14 anomalies were covered: anomalies A, B and #10 partial, D,
E, F and #14, #1, #2, #3 and #4 partial, and #16, #18 and #19.
The second phase consisted of mini-drill core sampling of high values located by the
spectrometer. The maximum sampling depth was 35 cm. Before work was stopped,
sampling was conducted on some small areas of the high spectrometer readings
discovered in the areas of anomalies #1 to #4.
Anomalies #1 to #4, as well as #16, #18 and #19, were not designated as high-priority
targets by RT Minerals. Work was therefore done on these anomalies on the FS’s
initiative, based on the progress of work on the “priority” anomalies, which was not
generating any significant results (only a few erratic radioactive boulders found at
anomalies A and B), to their location relative to the lakes, which indicated aberrations
(anomaly C located under a lake), and the presence of anomalous uranium values in the
lake-bottom sediments in the area of anomalies #1 and #4. This last type of geoscientific
data has proven to be a very good tool for locating high-potential targets elsewhere on the
North Shore (St. Lawrence Seaway), Quebec.
APRIL 30, 2009 CONCLUSIONS – Assessment Report­ Field Supervisor 

Despite the suspension of field work by RT Minerals in January 2009 and the questionable
quality of the radiometric survey that provided the basis for identification of the initial
ground targets, the author considers that this first field program on the Godbout property
returned significant uranium results.
As field work progressed, it became fairly evident that the anomalies identified by the
airborne survey were much less credible than targets identified on the basis of lake-bottom
sediment anomalies from the 2003 regional survey. The method of very tight ground
sweeps using spectrometers to cover a supposedly-anomalous zone proved very effective
for locating all the existing uranium mineralization.
Laboratory analysis generally corroborated the interesting values obtained with the
spectrometer directly on the outcrops. Most of the uranium analysis results are higher than
100 ppm, which is the cut-off grade of Rio Tinto’s Rössing open pit mine in Namibia,
which lies in a similar geological context. Unfortunately, there was not enough time to
properly observe the entire geological context and extract sufficient information to fully
assess the geologic potential.
The FS underscores one point that could have a negative impact on the project. The rare
earth element values track the uranium values. For the FS, who has relevant uranium
exploration experience in this area, this indicates that the uranium source might not be
uranium oxide, or uraninite, but rather silicates like allanite or monazite. This can only be
determined on thin sections or polished sections and should be completed.
APRIL 30, 2009 RECOMMENDATIONS – Assessment Report – Field Supervisor 

Although RT Minerals did not complete all of the original proposed work program, the QP
nevertheless feels that, given the results obtained, further work is warranted.
The first program would consist of completing the sweeps and sampling work in the area
of anomalies #1 to #4. Given the good results obtained in this area, the author also
recommends that sweeps also be carried out around the lakes around anomalies #1 and #2.
Once the results of grab sampling have been received for the area of anomalies #1 to #4,
mechanized stripping work is recommended, with sampling and assaying. Full petrology
studies should be performed on some of the samples to determine whether uraninite is
found in the area.
If results continue to be positive and the Company has the financial resources required, a
new, properly-performed airborne survey (by helicopter, not airplane) should be carried
out. The author recommends that a lake-bottom sediment survey of all the lakes on the
property be performed at the same time. The results should allow the location of the better
geophysical survey anomalies. If financial resources are limited, the author recommends
that at least the lake-bottom sediment survey be done, as it is much less expensive and has
been shown to be efficient. However, delays must be expected before the results are
obtained and subsequent field work can begin. Follow-up work would consist of the same
sequence as the present program.
The 2008 field program was carried out by the Field Supervisor (“FS”) Mr. Eric
Hurtubise, P.Geo. (#912 OGQ) of the Corporation de Promotion du Development Mineral
de la Cote-Nord (Quebec). On or about April 30, 2009, the “2008 Assessment Work
Report for Godbout Property”, written by Eric Hurtubise, P.Geo. (#912 OGQ) of the
Corporation de Promotion du Development Mineral de la Cote-Nord (Quebec), was
completed. The Assessment Report, its conclusions and its recommendations are
summarized above herein.
The Qualified Person for the Godbout property is Mr. Etienne Forbes, P.Geo., of Baie-
Comeau, Quebec.
      In the event that: (a) the uranium market improves; and (b) the results of the thin section
      analysis determine that uranium bearing samples are not from float material but rather are
      in-situ from bedrock sources on the property; and (c) should the Company conclude
      further equity financing, then the Company will consider further work at the Godbout
      property. Failing which the Company may not conduct any further material work on the
      Godbout property in 2009.
      In the meantime the Company initiated a property search for a Canadian gold property and
      has as at August 6, 2009 acquired an option to acquire up to a 100% interest in a gold
      property near Timmins, Ontario.
4.    There were no amended or abandoned properties or programs in the reporting period.
5.    None
6.    None
7.    Subsequent to the period, on August 6, 2009 the Issuer entered into an option to acquire
      100% of a gold property in Timmins, Ontario by paying $60,000 and issuing 500,000
      shares of the Issuer on signing. In addition, the Issuer must make optional cash payments
      of $970,000 and exploration expenditures of $2,100,000 over the next four years. The
      transaction is with an arm’s length party and the consideration was determined by fair
      market negotiations.
8.    None
9.    The Issuer does not have any intangible products.
10.   The Issuer did not hire, terminate or lay off any employees in the reporting month.
11.   The Issuer was not involved in any labour disputes in the reporting month.
12.   The Issuer was not a party in any legal proceeding in the reporting month.
13.   A payment of $500 was made on June 26, 2009 from the Issuer to retire a loan to a
      company related by common directors.
14.   The Issuer made the following issuance of securities in reporting period.
       Security                     Number Issued    Details of Issuance      Use of Proceeds(1)
       NIL                          NIL              NIL                      NIL

15.   In February 2009, the Company received a $500 cash advance from the President/CEO in
      the form of an unsecured demand loan bearing interest at 3% per annum, and a $2,500
      cash advance from OPW Acquisition Corp., a company related by virtue of a common
      director, in the form of an unsecured demand loan bearing interest at 3% per annum.
      In March 2009, the Company received a $2,000 cash advance from Clark Consulting
      Services Ltd., a company related by virtue of a common director, in the form of an
      unsecured demand loan bearing interest at 3% per annum.
      In May 2009, the Company received a $3,000 cash advance from the President/CEO in the
      form of an unsecured demand loan bearing interest at 3% per annum, and a $500 cash
      advance from International Kirkland Minerals Inc., a company related by virtue of
      common directors, in the form of an unsecured demand loan bearing interest at 3% per
      annum.
      In June 2009, the Company received a $2,070 cash advance from the President/CEO in the
      form of an unsecured demand loan bearing interest at 3% per annum, and the Company
      repaid a $500 cash advance to International Kirkland Minerals Inc., a company related by
      virtue of common directors.
      In July 2009, the Company received a $500 cash advance from Clark Consulting Services
      Ltd., a company related by virtue of a common director, in the form of an unsecured
      demand loan bearing interest at 3% per annum.

16.   There were no changes in directors or officers in the reporting month.
17.   None
Certificate Of Compliance

The undersigned hereby certifies that:

1.     The undersigned is a director and/or senior officer of the Issuer and has been duly
       authorized by a resolution of the board of directors of the Issuer to sign this
       Certificate of Compliance.

2.     As of the date hereof there were is no material information concerning the Issuer
       which has not been publicly disclosed.

3.     The undersigned hereby certifies to CNSX that the Issuer is in compliance with
       the requirements of applicable securities legislation (as such term is defined in
       National Instrument 14-101) and all CNSX Requirements (as defined in CNSX
       Policy 1).

4.     All of the information in this Form 7 Monthly Progress Report is true.


Dated August 10, 2009.

Jonathan Samuda
Name of Director or Senior Officer


“ Jonathan Samuda”
Signature

Director / Corporate Secretary
Official Capacity

Issuer Details                    For Month End           Date of Report

RT Minerals Corp.                 July 2009            2009/08/10
Issuer Address                    PO Box 10103 LCD Pacific Centre
                                  515 – 701 West Georgia Street
City/Province/Postal Code         Issuer Fax No.       Issuer Telephone No.
Vancouver, BC V7Y 1C6             ( 604) 681-3552      ( 604 ) 681-3170
Contact Name                      Contact Position        Contact Telephone No.
Donald (Dan) Clark                CEO / President         ( 604 ) 681-3170
Contact Email Address             Web Site Address
dan@rtmcorp.com                   www.rtmcorp.com