PROJECT APPLICATION EVALUATION CRITERIA
Operational programme 3. INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICES
number and title:
Priority number and 3.1. INFRASTRUCTURE FOR STRENGHTENING HUMAN
title: CAPITAL
Measure number and 3.1.5. HEALTH CARE INFRASTRUCTURE
title:
Activity number and 3.1.5.1 DEVELOPEMENT OF AMBULATORY HEALTH CARE
title:
Sub-activity number and 3.1.5.1.2. DEVELOPMENT OF THE HEALTH CARE CENTRES
title:
Project application LIMITED PROJECT APPLICATION SELECTION
selection type:
Competent institution: MINISTRY OF HEALTH
Minimal score /
Nr. CRITERIA Evaluation Action in case of
negative decision
1. QUALITY CRITERIA
1. Implementation of project’s activities is reasonable
a. Project activity implementation substantiation using
statistical analysis and screening of activity influence,
1
comparing with alternative activities, valuated
positively 1/N
b. Project activity implementation substantiation using
statistical analysis and screening of activity influence,
0
comparing with alternative activities, valuated
negatively
2. Project refers on development of cost effective health
care services
a. After implementation of the project incomes from
through the project developed services will be able to
2
cover amortization costs of infrastructure that directly
and indirectly connected with corresponding services
b. After implementation of the project incomes from 1/N
through the project developed services will be able to
1
cover amortization costs of infrastructure that directly
connected with corresponding services
c. After implementation of the project incomes from
through the project developed services will not be able 0
to cover amortization costs of infrastructure that
2008-10-14 31512criteria [ENG]; Project evaluation criteria for Operational programme “Īnfrastructure and
services” 3.1.5.1.2.subactivity “Development of the Health Care Centres”
2
Minimal score /
Nr. CRITERIA Evaluation Action in case of
negative decision
connected with corresponding services
3. Project preparedness for realizing is acceptable
a. Within the project framework technical project is
developed for all activities which are relevant to 2
renovation and reconstruction
b. Within the project framework sketch project is Criteria gives
developed for all activities which are relevant to 1 additional points
renovation and reconstruction
c. Within the project framework technical project or
sketch project is not developed for activities which are 0
relevant to renovation and reconstruction
4. Project target group is acceptable
a. Number of registered inhabitants in area where health
care centre is providing health care service is more 2
than 7 000
b. Number of registered inhabitants in area where health
1/N
care centre is providing health care service is from 3 1
500 till 7 000
c. Number of registered inhabitants in area where health
care centre is providing health care service is less 0
than 3 500
5. Project implementation period is acceptable
a. Project implementation period is less than 12 months 2
b. Project implementation period is from 12 till 22 1/N
1
months
c. Project implementation period is more than 22 months 0
6. Project results upkeeping period is acceptable
a. Reached results lasts more than 10 years after project
2
implementation
1/N
b. Reached results lasts from 5 till 10 years after project
1
implementation
c. Reached results lasts less than 5 years after project
0
implementation
1.1. QUALITY CRITERIA OF HORIZONTAL PRIORITATIES
7. Project supports “Balanced territorial development”
priority implementation
a. It is planned to realize project in municipality which Criteria gives
2 additional points
territory development index is under -0,325
b. It is planned to realize project in municipality which
1
territory development index is from -0,325 till 0,247
2008-10-14 31512criteria [ENG]; Project evaluation criteria for Operational programme “Īnfrastructure and
services” 3.1.5.1.2.subactivity “Development of the Health Care Centres”
3
Minimal score /
Nr. CRITERIA Evaluation Action in case of
negative decision
c. It is planned to realize project in municipality which
territory development index is more than 0,247 0
8. Project supports “Macroeconomic stability” priority
implementation
a. In project planned average investments for one
registered inhabitant in area where health care centre 2
is providing health care service is lessthan 100 LVL
b. In project planned average investments for one Criteria gives
registered inhabitant in area where health care centre
1 additional points
is providing health care service is from 100 LVL till
200 LVL
c. In project planned average investments for one
registered inhabitant in area where health care centre 0
is providing health care service is more than 200 LVL
9. Project supports “Sustainable development” priority
implementation
a. In project planned activities has directly pointed to
environment protection
2
b. In project planned activities has indirectly pointed to Criteria gives
environment protection 1 additional points
c. No activities pointed to environment protection has
planned in project 0
10. Project supports “Equal opportunities” priority
implementation
a. There are 4 or more specific activities for providing
principles of equal opportunities planned, specially
3
improving accessibility for physically disabled
persons
b. There are from 1 till 3 specific activities for providing 2/N
principles of equal opportunities planned, specially
2
improving accessibility for physically disabled
persons
c. There are no planned specific activities for providing
principles of equal opportunities, specially improving 0
accessibility for physically disabled persons
11. Project supports “Information society” priority
implementation
a. There are planned activities in project to create or to
2 Criteria gives
improve communication network
b. There are planned activities in project to purchase additional points
1
computer facility
c. There are no planned activities in project to create or
0
to improve communication network and to purchase
2008-10-14 31512criteria [ENG]; Project evaluation criteria for Operational programme “Īnfrastructure and
services” 3.1.5.1.2.subactivity “Development of the Health Care Centres”
4
Minimal score /
Nr. CRITERIA Evaluation Action in case of
negative decision
computer facilities
2. ACCORDANCE CRITERIA
2.1. PROJECT APPLICATION ACCORDANCE CRITERIA
12. Project application conforms to activity implementation
conditions Yes / No BP / P
13. Project planned costs conforms to activity
implementation conditions Yes / No BP / P
14. Project planned actions are health care centre
development on convertible hospital bases and existent
health care centre infrastructure improvement, supporting
Yes / No BP / P
premises renovation, reconstructions or equipment
purchase and are complied with implementation
requirements of the activity
15. Project refers to adjustment of infrastructure of
ambulatory health care service providers making better
Yes / No BP / N
accessibility and development to ambulatory health care
services.
16. All activities in project application are based on
statistical analysis and screening of activity influence, Yes / No BP / N
comparing with alternative activities
17. After realizing project it is planned to use within the
project framework developed infrastructure and
Yes / No BP / P
purschased facilities only for ambulatory health care
services providing
18. Project total sum of eligible costs is limited from 17 570
Yes / No BP / P
lats till 702 804 lats
19. All planned activities in project application are
accurately defined, grounded, conform to project
Yes / No BP / P
realization plan and pointed to project goal
consummation and target group needs satisfaction
20. All planned results and its indexes in project application
are accurately defined, grounded, measurable, conform to
Yes / No BP / P
project realization plan and pointed to project goal
consummation and target group needs satisfaction
2008-10-14 31512criteria [ENG]; Project evaluation criteria for Operational programme “Īnfrastructure and
services” 3.1.5.1.2.subactivity “Development of the Health Care Centres”
5
Minimal score /
Nr. CRITERIA Evaluation Action in case of
negative decision
21. In project planned expenses are grounded and necessary
for implementation of project, and ensure physical Yes / No BP / P
measurable results
22. It is planned to consume not less than 35% of project
budget till first year of project implementation ends Yes / No BP / P
23. Project applicant for project implementation required
technical equipment and qualification level issufficient Yes / No BP / P
and reasoned
24. In Project framework planned activities do not cover
activities, which are financed by other European Union Yes / No BP / P
structure fund activities and other financial instruments
25. Planned project publicity and information distribution
measures are complied with normative documents about
Yes / No BP / P
Europen Union funds project publicity and information
distribution requirements
2.2. PROJECT APPLICANT ACCORDANCE CRITERIA
26. Project applicant is health care institution which is
planned as health care centre in 2010 Yes / No BP / N
27. Project applicant approached enough financial resources
for financing project Yes / No BP / P
28. Infrastructure where it is planned to perform European
Regional Development Fund investments is in the
property of project applicant or the owner of the
infrastructure (government or local authority) has
submitted the confirmation where it is stated that Yes / No BP / P
infrastructure owner agrees to the fact that investments in
the infrastructure will be made by project applicant and
the infrastructure will be used for the health care services
at least 5 years after the project implementation.
29. Project applicant is confirmed that in the event if project
costs increase own capital financing will be provided Yes / No BP / N
3. ADMINISTRATIVE CRITERIA
30. Project applicant is invited to commit project
Yes / No BP / N
application
2008-10-14 31512criteria [ENG]; Project evaluation criteria for Operational programme “Īnfrastructure and
services” 3.1.5.1.2.subactivity “Development of the Health Care Centres”
6
Minimal score /
Nr. CRITERIA Evaluation Action in case of
negative decision
31. Project application is committed by project applicant in
Yes / No BP / N
invitation settled time
32. Project application is prepared in computer print
Yes / No BP / N
33. Project application is written in Latvian
Yes / No BP / N
34. Financial calculations of project application are made in
Latvian lats (LVL) Yes / No BP / N
35. Project application is prepeared in accordance with
activity project application form and is completed Yes / No BP / P
36. Project application include in normative documents about
sub-activities implementation definite appendixes Yes / No BP / P
37. There are no erasures, none dissuade corrections,
scratches and additions in project application Yes / No BP / P
38. Original project application is sealed (if project
Yes / No BP / P
application committed in form of paper)
39. Electronic version of project application is attached (if
Yes / No BP / P
project application committed in form of paper)
40. Project application is completed accordingly to
normative documentation of electronical documentation Yes / No BP / P
flow (if project application committed electronically)
41. Project application is signed by authorized person
Yes / No BP / P
42. If project applicant annexes are not published in Latvian,
confirmed translation in Latvian is added to documents
Yes / No BP / P
accordingly to normative documents about the order how
to confirm document translation in state language
43. Project application financial account is developed
Yes / No BP / P
correctly and arithmetically accurately
4. GRANTING CRITERIA
44. If project application is complied with administrative
and accordance criterias then total criteria assessment of Yes/ No BP / N
quality criterias is at least 10 points
2008-10-14 31512criteria [ENG]; Project evaluation criteria for Operational programme “Īnfrastructure and
services” 3.1.5.1.2.subactivity “Development of the Health Care Centres”
7
Minimal score /
Nr. CRITERIA Evaluation Action in case of
negative decision
45. Arranged in point 44 with „Yes” evaluated project
applications in priority sequence, started with most
Yes/ No BP / N
points received project application, financial resources
of the activity is enough for project application
N – In case of negative decision project application can be rejected
P – In case of negative decision. Decision can be made as project confirmation on condition (that
project applicant will provide accordance to criteria in decision definite time)
BP – is beside of point
2008-10-14 31512criteria [ENG]; Project evaluation criteria for Operational programme “Īnfrastructure and
services” 3.1.5.1.2.subactivity “Development of the Health Care Centres”