Embed
Email

Roe Vs. Wade

Document Sample

Shared by: pengxiuhui
Categories
Tags
Stats
views:
2
posted:
12/18/2011
language:
pages:
12
Roe Vs. Wade

1973

Constitutional issue

 Roe sued based on the XIV amendment

which stated “nor shall any state deprive

any person of life, liberty or property.”

She stated that it was her life and her

body and that she could do whatever she

wanted in safe conditions.

Litigant: Roe

 Norma Leah McCorvey (née Nelson,

born September 22, 1947), better

known by the legal pseudonym "Jane

Roe", was the plaintiff in the

landmark American lawsuit Roe v.

Wade in 1973. The U.S. Supreme

Court overturned individual states'

laws against abortion by ruling them

unconstitutional

Litigant: Wade

 Wade, as Dallas County District Attorney, was the named defendant

when attorneys Sarah Weddington and Linda Coffee took on a 1970

constitutional challenge to the Texas criminal statutes prohibiting

doctors from performing abortions with the exception to save the

life of the mother. Norma McCorvey ("Jane Roe"), The challenge

sought a declaratory judgment that the Texas criminal abortion

statutes were unconstitutional on their face, and an injunction

restraining the defendant from enforcing the statutes. The lower

court refused to grant Roe's desired injunction, but declared the

criminal abortion statutes were void. Consequently, both side cross-

appealed. The case worked its way through the appellate process,

culminating in the Supreme Court's landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade

decision which made abortion legal in the United States. Until that

decision, Wade had never lost a case

Background Information

 In September 1969, Norma L. McCorvey found

out she was pregnant. She returned to Dallas,

where friends told her to falsely acclaim that

she had been raped, because then she could

obtain a legal abortion. However, this failed,

since there was no police report proving the

alleged rape. She attempted to obtain an illegal

abortion, but found the unauthorized site

shuttered, closed down by the police.

Eventually, she was referred to attorneys Linda

Coffee and Sarah Weddington.

Background Information

 In 1970, attorneys Linda Coffee and Sarah

Weddington filed suit in a U.S. District

Court in Texas on behalf of Norma L.

McCorvey (under the alias Jane Roe). The

defendant in the case was Dallas County

District Attorney Henry Wade,representing

the State of Texas.

Majority opinion

 The opinion of the Roe Court, written by Justice

Harry Blackmun, declined to adopt the district

court's Ninth Amendment rationale, and instead

asserted that the "right of privacy, whether it be

founded in the Fourteenth Amendment's concept

of personal liberty and restrictions upon state

action, as we feel it is, or, as the District Court

determined, in the Ninth Amendment's

reservation of rights to the people, is broad

enough to encompass a woman's decision

whether or not to terminate her pregnancy."

Dissenting Opinion

Justice White wrote:

 “I find nothing in the language or history of the Constitution to

support the Court's judgment. The Court simply fashions and

announces a new constitutional right for pregnant mothers and,

with scarcely any reason or authority for its action, invests that right

with sufficient substance to override most existing state abortion

statutes. The upshot is that the people and the legislatures of the

50 States are constitutionally disentitled to weigh the relative

importance of the continued existence and development of the

fetus, on the one hand, against a spectrum of possible impacts on

the mother, on the other hand. As an exercise of raw judicial power,

the Court perhaps has authority to do what it does today; but, in my

view, its judgment is an improvident and extravagant exercise of

the power of judicial review that the Constitution extends to this

Court.”

Dissenting Opinion

Judge Rehnquist

“To reach its result, the Court necessarily has had to find

within the scope of the Fourteenth Amendment a right

that was apparently completely unknown to the drafters

of the Amendment. As early as 1821, the first state law

dealing directly with abortion was enacted by the

Connecticut Legislature. By the time of the adoption of

the Fourteenth Amendment in 1868, there were at least

36 laws enacted by state or territorial legislatures

limiting abortion. While many States have amended or

updated their laws, 21 of the laws on the books in 1868

remain in effect today.

Significance

 The decision in Roe v. Wade began a still-

continuing national debate over whether

terminating pregnancies should be legal, or

rather can a state choose to deem the act

illegal, the role of the Supreme Court in

constitutional adjudication, and the role of

religious views in the political sphere. Roe v.

Wade became one of the most politically

significant Supreme Court decisions in history,

reshaping national politics, dividing the nation

into "pro-choice" and "pro-life" camps, and

inspiring grassroots activism.

Our Reflections

 We feel that this case was a very sensitive issue,

and we tried to inform everyone without being

byist. We Found that a basic layout of

everything will provide enough information to all

of you so that you can draw your own

conclusions.

 Weather you agree or disagree the courts ruling

was final and abortion is legal. However in the

future that could change. This is due to all the

anti-abortion activist.

Bibliography

Website #1-

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Wade

this webpage provided all the information we

needed about Henry Wade

Website #2-

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norma_McCorvey

this webpage provided all the information we

needed on Jane Row.

Website #3-http://www.tourolaw.edu/patch/roe/

This webpage provided information we needed on

the court case



Related docs
Other docs by pengxiuhui
[CMS-SPIP CMS pour Susciter une
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
RéGIME ENREGISTRé D'éPARGNE-éTUDES
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Aggregation and Synchronization
Views: 2  |  Downloads: 0
5816-Port 10100Mbps Fast Etherne
Views: 3  |  Downloads: 0
GHQpotato1_05
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
WIPO Domain Name Dispute Case No.D2010-1415
Views: 1  |  Downloads: 0
YOUTH APPLICATION
Views: 4  |  Downloads: 0
S-Link to Gigabit Ethernet Adapt
Views: 2  |  Downloads: 0
By registering with docstoc.com you agree to our
privacy policy

You are almost ready to download!

You are almost ready to download!