IP_Asset_Valuation_and_IP_Audit

Document Sample
IP_Asset_Valuation_and_IP_Audit Powered By Docstoc
					IP Asset Valuation and IP Audit

                 T C James
                  Director
National Intellectual Property Organisation
                  Objective
• To give a general introduction to the concepts
  of IP valuation and IP Audit
• To briefly explain IP valuation and the key
  definitions like assets, IP assets, value and IP
  valuation, the differences between various
  methods deployed to value IP assets, IP audit,
  the preparations, procedures and results of an
  IP audit.

                  CUTS training programme 14 Jul 11   2
IP VALUATION


          CUTS training programme 14 Jul 11   3
                        Assets
• An economic resource.
• Anything tangible or intangible that is capable of
  being owned or controlled to produce value and
  that is held to have positive economic value is
  considered an asset.
• An item of economic value owned by an
  enterprise that could be converted into cash
• “An asset is a resource controlled by the
  enterprise as a result of past events and from
  which future economic benefits are expected to
  flow to the enterprise”
                   CUTS training programme 14 Jul 11   4
             Two Kinds of Assets
• Tangible
  – Building
  – Machinery
• Intangible
  – Goodwill
  – Intellectual Property




                   CUTS training programme 14 Jul 11   5
                      IP Assets
•   Intangible asset – knowledge based
•   Legal Right to exclude others from using
•   Limited duration
•   Assignable/ Licensable/Transferable
    – Can be bought, sold, licensed, or given away free
• Multi-usable
• Use does not exhaust

                     CUTS training programme 14 Jul 11    6
     Factors driving the intellectual
                property
• Intellectual property derives its value from a
  wide range of significant parameters such as
  – Market share
  – Barriers to entry
  – Legal Protection
  – IP’s profitability
  – Industrial and economic factors
  – Growth projections
  – New Technologies

                   CUTS training programme 14 Jul 11   7
             Risks in IP Assets
•   New Patents
•   Revocation of Patents
•   Infringement Suits
•   Trade Secrets
•   Weak Enforcement Regimes




                 CUTS training programme 14 Jul 11   8
                Valuation
• Valuation is a process of determining value
  or worth of an asset
• Valuation often combines objective and
  subjective considerations




                CUTS training programme 14 Jul 11   9
                 IP Valuation
• IP valuation dependent on various factors
  – Use of the IP assets
  – Market share of company
  – Openness of economy
  – Legal protection of IP
     • Enforcement cost
  – Economic growth
  – Profile of economy

                   CUTS training programme 14 Jul 11   10
                 Use of IP Valuation
•   For commercial transactions
•   For pricing product
•   For evaluating potential merger or acquisition candidates
•   For identifying and prioritizing assets that drive value
•   For strengthening positions in technology transfer negotiations
•   For making informed financial decisions on IP maintenance,
    commercialization and donation
•   For evaluating the commercial prospects for early stage Research &
    Development (R&D)
•   For evaluating R&D efforts and prioritizing research projects
•   For Financing securitisation
•   For litigation
•   For tax planning


                          CUTS training programme 14 Jul 11          11
        Benefits of IP Valuation
• Can give a better idea of the overall value of the
  business
• Can provide a tool to measure and manage the
  assets
• Can provide security and backing for lenders
• Can provide taxation benefits (taxation
  deductions)
• Can reduce the proportion of business’ net worth
  attributed to goodwill – important when selling a
  business

                   CUTS training programme 14 Jul 11   12
    IP Valuation Methodologies
• Transactional/Market Approach
• Cost Approach
• Income Approach




                CUTS training programme 14 Jul 11   13
         Transactional Method
• Sales comparison approach
• It is based on actual price paid for a similar or
  comparable IP under similar/comparable
  circumstances
• Need complete data
• Problem in getting full details
• Two steps: screening and adjustments
• Screening is identifying third party transactions
• Adjustments are in Location, Advertising support,
  IP strength and period of licence

                  CUTS training programme 14 Jul 11   14
                Market Approach
• When
  – Focus is on market transactions – sales/licenses
  – IP transaction details highly confidential
  – Assets typically not comparable
     •   Different underlying IP assets
     •   Different compensation structures
     •   Different geographic territories
     •   Different market potentials/degree of success



                       CUTS training programme 14 Jul 11   15
              Income Method
• Intrinsic value
• Ability to generate cash flow
  – Income Approach: Based on the income-
    producing capability of underlying IP asset
     • Seeks to establish the net present value (hence
       use of discounted cash flow [DCF])
     • Decision tree analysis (DTA)-based on an
       underlying DCF analysis and moves further to take
       into consideration flexibility available.


                   CUTS training programme 14 Jul 11   16
               Income Approach
•   PV = I1(1+r)-1 + I2(1+r)-2 + I3(1+r)-3….+ In(1+r)-n
•   Where PV = Present value of IP asset
•   I = Economic income projection
•   r = Discount rate
•   n = Year




                      CUTS training programme 14 Jul 11   17
   Variables in Income Approach
• An income stream either from product sales
  or licensure of the patent
• An estimate of the duration of the patent’s
  useful life
• An understanding of patent specific risk
  factors and incorporating those into the
  valuation
• A discount rate

                 CUTS training programme 14 Jul 11   18
 Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Method
• Attempts to determine the value of the IP by computing
  the present value of cash flows, attributable to that piece
  of IP, over the useful life of the asset.
• Does not capture the unique independent risks associated
  with patents. All risks are lumped together and are
  assumed to be appropriately adjusted for in the discount
  rate and the probability of success, rather than being
  broken out and dealt with individually (i.e., such as legal
  risk, technological risk, piracy, etc.)
• Further, often DCF fails to consider dependencies on
  properties held by others. In roughly 40 percent of cases,
  patents depend on other patents or property held in the
  public domain

                      CUTS training programme 14 Jul 11         19
                   Cost Method

• Estimates the value of underlying IP asset
  basing on historical cost incurred in
  developing the asset
• Two approaches
      • Replacement cost
      • Reproduction cost
• Replacement Cost: The cost to develop similar
  functionality to the subject IP outside the scope
  of the legal protection
• Reproduction cost: Cost of reproducing the IP
  product or service or procedure

                     CUTS training programme 14 Jul 11   20
         Cost Approach: When?
• Has limited value
• Used for
  – Patents
  – Software
  – Designs
• When
  – Asset is newly created with limited protection
  – Commercially untested
  – Where reproduction cost best estimate of value
     • Buyer unwilling to pay more than cost to recreate or
       engineer around protected design

                      CUTS training programme 14 Jul 11       21
       Cost Approach: Factors?
• Components of Cost Value Assessment
  – Materials
  – Labour
  – Overhead
  – Developer’s/entrepreneur’s profit
  – Taxes




                  CUTS training programme 14 Jul 11   22
         Calculating Net Value
• Net present value
  – Calculating the future value of intellectual
    asset (investment) at present time

  – NPV= A(1 + r)-n           i.e. NPV = A[1/(1 + r)n]

     where: NPV= net present value (i.e. DCF);
                  A= amount expected at year n; r
    = risk factor

                  CUTS training programme 14 Jul 11      23
Factors Considered in Patent Valuation
• Qualitative and quantitative characteristics of the patent(s),
  including the specific patent claim
• Earnings capacity and profitability relating to the patent(s)
• The impact of known blocking patents
• Any current or previous licensing of the patent
• Legal rights and restrictions to the patent(s), including foreign
  patent protection
• Contracts associated with the patent(s)
• Competition, barriers to entry and risks associated with the
  patent(s)
• Product life cycles and positioning
• Historical growth and prospects for the future
• Alternative uses for the patent(s)


                          CUTS training programme 14 Jul 11           24
     Factors Considered in Trade Mark
                Valuation
• Qualitative and quantitative characteristics of the trademark(s)
• Earnings capacity and profitability relating to the trademark(s)
• Market share supported by, or as a result of the trademark(s)
• Market recognition analysis of the trademark(s)
• Legal rights and restrictions to the trademark(s)
• Contracts associated with the trademark(s)
• Competition, barriers to entry and risks associated with the
  trademark(s)
• Product life cycles and positioning
• Historical growth and prospects for the future
• Exploitation opportunities of the trademark(s) into new
  markets/products



                          CUTS training programme 14 Jul 11          25
    Factors Considered in Brand Valuation
• Qualitative and quantitative characteristics of the brand name(s)
• Earnings capacity and profitability relating to the brand name(s)
• Market share supported by, or as a result of the brand name(s)
• Market recognition analysis of the brand name(s)
• Legal rights and restrictions to the brand name(s)
• Contracts associated with the brand name(s)
• Competition, barriers to entry and risks associated with the brand
  name(s)
• Product life cycles and positioning
• Historical growth and prospects for the future
• Exploitation opportunities of the brand name(s) into new
  markets/products



                         CUTS training programme 14 Jul 11             26
IP AUDIT


           CUTS training programme 14 Jul 11   27
             IP Audit: What is It?
• A systematic review of the IP assets owned, used or
  acquired by a business
• IP Audit says
   – How the IP assets are being used or not used
   – Whether the IP assets used by it are owned by the
     company or others
   – Whether these IP assets are infringing the rights of others
     or others are infringing on those rights, and determine, in
     the light of all this information
   – What actions are required to be taken w.r.t. each IP asset,
     or portfolio of such assets to serve the relevant business
     goals of the company


                       CUTS training programme 14 Jul 11           28
             IP Audit: Objective
• To uncover under-utilized IP assets
• To identify any threats to a company’s bottom line
• To enable business planners to devise informed
  strategies that will maintain and improve the
  company’s market position
  “Overall purpose of an IP audit is to identify and
  assess all of the company’s intangible assets in order
  to conduct a SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses,
  Opportunities, and Threats) analysis to determine the
  valuable core assets and optimize their usage through
  a systematic long-term strategy”

                    CUTS training programme 14 Jul 11   29
           Steps ion IP Audit 1
• First Step: Investigation
  All things created, developed or used by the
  organisation such as, inventions, formulas,
  processes, devices or other technologies,
  creative works, such as music, books or
  computer video games, business information,
  including advertising, promotional materials,
  customer lists, prospect lists, pricing
  information, sales figures, financial projections
  and other materials
                  CUTS training programme 14 Jul 11   30
            Steps in IP Audit 2
• Second Step: Identification
• Identify the readily identifiable IP
  – Trademarks
  – Copyrights
  – Designs
  – Patents
  – Product/process Know-how
  – Trade Secrets

                   CUTS training programme 14 Jul 11   31
           Steps in IP Audit- 3
• Third Step: Categorisation
  – Owner
  – Licensee
  – Licensor
  – Domestic
  – Foreign




                 CUTS training programme 14 Jul 11   32
           Steps in IP Audit 4
• Fourth Step: Itemize external or market
  influences
  – company brand
  – product brands
  – company and product get-up
  – Goodwill
  – product certification
  – export certifications
  – Regulatory approvals

                 CUTS training programme 14 Jul 11   33
             Steps in IP Audit - 5
•   Fifth Step: Examine Enforceability
•   Legal Provisions and Economics
•   Administrative Action
•   Legal Steps
    – Civil Procedures
    – Criminal Procedures



                    CUTS training programme 14 Jul 11   34
          An Inventory of IP Audit
• Whether or not your IP rights are registered;
• Whether you have any intellectual property issues and
  what to do to address them;
• Who owns the rights and, if you not, identify any conditions
  that apply to their use;
• An assessment of whether your IP is being used effectively;
• Whether your rights are being challenged or threatened by
  others;
• Whether you have an effective IP management and
  maintenance plan in place; and
• Records of your IP creation and ownership.


                      CUTS training programme 14 Jul 11     35
   Content of an IP Audit Report 1
• Inventory issues.
   – A catalogue of intellectual property assets, including
     disclosures, patents, trademarks, trade secrets, contracts,
     agreements, and so on
• Rights issues.
   – An understanding of rights that have been acquired, and
     whether they have been properly maintained; an
     understanding of those rights that have not been acquired
     and whether or not they should be
• Ownership issues.
   – Does the company have clear ownership over these
     assets? Has title been properly assigned by
     employees/consultants?

                       CUTS training programme 14 Jul 11           36
   Content of an IP Audit Report 2
• Infringement issues.
   – Are patents being used for which the company does not
     have rights?
• Strategic issues.
   – Are these assets being properly managed and exploited in
     alignment with the strategic objectives of the company?
     Are there restrictions to their use?
• Deficiency issues.
   – Are there patentable technologies currently not
     protected? Are there copyright and trademark registration
     applications to be filed? Are there affidavits of continued
     use of trademarks, maintenance fees to keep patents in
     force, and so on?

                       CUTS training programme 14 Jul 11        37
       When to do an IP Audit?
• General Purpose Audit:
  – As part of an ongoing IP asset management
    programme
• Event Driven:
  – When a business is being bought, or sold
  – When you are enforcing or defending your IP
    rights.



                  CUTS training programme 14 Jul 11   38
        Dow Chemical Company
• IP Audit and asset management programme
  started in 1992
• Classified entire IP portfolio including 30,000
  patents
• A team of 9 people worked for 12 months
  analysing the patents and recommending
  maintenance or abandonment
• $ 40 million saving by abandoning some patents
• Started licensing which grew from $ 25 M to $
  250 M in 5 years.

                  CUTS training programme 14 Jul 11   39
               Remember ...
• In 2005, Qualcomm generated about 58% of its
  $5.7 billion in revenue from the sale of
  Qualcomm‐designed wireless chips, which are
  manufactured by third parties under contract
• Since 1993, IBM has been making some US$1
  billion per year from licensing non‐core
  technologies, which otherwise would have
  remained unused.
• Honeywell, in 2000, received a then record award
  of damages of US$127 million from Minolta for
  technology it hadn’t itself commercialized.

                  CUTS training programme 14 Jul 11   40
              Remember ...
• The Coca‐cola brand is estimated to be worth
  US$80 billion.
• US company Texas Instruments earns more
  from licensing its unused patent rights than
  from its products
      Need IP Valuation, Audit and an Asset
    Management strategy to optimise income
                      and profit

                 CUTS training programme 14 Jul 11   41
                  Questions

For further information pl contact at
tcjames@nipo.in


                  CUTS training programme 14 Jul 11   42

				
DOCUMENT INFO
Shared By:
Categories:
Tags:
Stats:
views:12
posted:12/16/2011
language:English
pages:42