Embed
Email

imac

Document Sample

Shared by: huanghengdong
Categories
Tags
Stats
views:
0
posted:
12/15/2011
language:
pages:
29
Society of Automotive Engineers

Improved Mobile Air

Conditioning Cooperative

Research Program









Improved HFC-134a

Refrigerant Systems

Improved Mobile Air

Conditioning (IMAC)

• Announced April 22, 2004

• A comprehensive industry-government cooperative

research program to responsibly manage all aspects of

lifetime vehicle air conditioner environmental performance

– Develop and demonstrate improved vehicle air

conditioners using HFC-134a refrigerant

– Add to customer value

– Improve recovery and recycling of refrigerant during

service and vehicle end-of-life disposal

• Participants include international automobile and air

conditioner system manufacturers, component and

equipment suppliers, refrigerant manufacturers, MAC

service providers and the Environmental Protection Agency





August 18, 2005 IMAC CRP 2

Current 27 Corporate Sponsors

• Ineous Fluor

• Arkema (Autofina)

• Japan Fluor Mfg Assoc

• Audi

• Manuli

• Behr

• Modine

• BMW

• Nissan

• DaimlerChrysler

• Parker Hannifin

• Delphi

• Sanden

• Denso

• Schrader-Bridgeport

• DuPont

• Solvay

• Ford

• TI Automotive

• Fujikoki

• Toyota

• General Motors

• Trelleborg

• Goodyear

• Viking Plastics

• Honeywell

• Visteon





August 18, 2005 IMAC CRP 3

Project Goals

Team 4

Containment During

Team 1

Service & Disposal

50% Leakage

IMAC Core Reduction



Team 2

30% Efficiency

Improvement

Demonstration Vehicles

2005/2006

Team 3

30% Load

Reduction



August 18, 2005 IMAC CRP 4

IMAC Program Objectives

• Reduce “direct” HFC-134a refrigerant

emissions that leak from MACs

• Reduce “indirect emissions”, which are

emissions related to the burning of fuel needed

to power the air conditioner

• Reduce any other emissions during the

manufacture, installation, operation, servicing

and disposal of the system

• Provide a directly comparative engineering

evaluation

– Existing and improved technologies

– Vehicle and system design

– Servicing of systems



August 18, 2005 IMAC CRP 5

Project Organization



•Overall Project Management

CORE Tier One Tier Two OEM Industry •Financial Oversight

•Funding strategy

GROUP •Educate management

SAE





Leakage Efficiency Vehicle Load Service





Members: Members: Members: Members: •Overall Technical

•Tier 1 suppliers •OEM’s •OEM’s •OEM’s Leadership

•Tier 2 suppliers •Tier 1 suppliers •Tier 1 suppliers •Tier 1 suppliers

•LCA & Cost Benefit

•OEM’s •NREL •NREL •EPA

•MACS and •EPA •University’s •MACS and Analysis

Members •University’s •Other members •Sub-group

•EPA •Other •Other Coordination

•Refrigerant Suppliers

•Other





OEM Advisors

•GM

•Ford To advise in case of proprietary

•D-C technologies

August 18, 2005 IMAC CRP 6

IMAC Project Teams

Team1 Team2 Team3 Team4

Team Name: Refrigerant AC System Vehicle Service

Leakage Efficiency Thermal refrigerant

Reduction Improvement Load loss

Reduction Reduction

Number of Team 24 16 8 25

Members:

OEM’s: 5 4 3 2

Tier1’s: 13 8 1 7

Others: 6 4 3 16

Goals: Reduction Improved Load Reduction in

in Efficiency Reduction refrigerant

Leakage Improved losses at

comfort service



August 18, 2005 IMAC CRP 7

Team 1

Refrigerant Leakage

Reduction



• Goal:

– Reduce HFC-134a Mobile Air

Conditioning System refrigerant

direct emissions by 50%







August 18, 2005 IMAC CRP 8

Team 1

Progress to Date



• Identified 4 current production

vehicles to baseline for refrigerant

leakage rate

– Dodge Caravan (dual system)

– Ford F150

– Toyota Camry

– GM W Car





August 18, 2005 IMAC CRP 9

Team 1

Progress to Date



• Evaluated mini-shed tests to

establish refrigerant system direct

emissions



• Evaluating assembly plant “noise

factors” regarding assembly of

system components free of

contamination, damage, etc.



August 18, 2005 IMAC CRP 10

Team 1

2006 Plan

• Develop SAE Standard for

component and system mini-shed

test

 Develop SAE Standard for reclaim

procedure to determine actual

vehicle charge level

 Evaluate new low emissions

technologies per standard

August 18, 2005 IMAC CRP 11

Team 1

Description of Technologies

• Improved crimps

• Improved fittings

• Compressor shaft seal and body seals

• Hose permeation

• Material integrity-tubing

• Reduced number of joints

• TXV

• Transducer/switches

• Service valves/caps

• Manufacturing/Assembly specifications

• Leakage Test Procedure

• Robust Manufacturing/Assembly Procedures





August 18, 2005 IMAC CRP 12

Team 2

System Efficiency

• Goal:

– Improve system COP by 30% over the

enhanced R134a system that was

demonstrated in the SAE Phase 1

Alternative Refrigerant Cooperative

Research Program (ARCRP)

– Demonstrate equivalent performance







August 18, 2005 IMAC CRP 13

Team 2

Deliverables

• Demonstrate COP improvement on a System Test

Stand

• Demonstrate equal performance in a Vehicle Tunnel

• SAE J Standard for Measurement of System COP

using the System Test Stand Approach

• SAE J Standard for Annualized Climate Calculation of

System Power Loss

• Relative Cost / Benefit Analysis:

– Cost will be relative on a 1-10 scale

– Benefit will be COP improvement over the

enhanced R134a ARCRP system



August 18, 2005 IMAC CRP 14

Team 2

2005 Plans

• System Stand:

– Improved sub-cooling control (condenser)

– Improved superheat control (evaporator)

– Improved compressor efficiency

– Internal (suction/liquid) heat exchangers

• Vehicle:

– Sub-cooling and superheat algorithm

development

– A/C performance demonstration





August 18, 2005 IMAC CRP 15

Team 2

2006 Plans

• System Stand:

– Next generation condensers (pending availability)

– Next generation evaporators (pending availability)

– Alternative compressor designs (pending availability)

– “Best of the Best” combination

• Vehicle:

– Continue system development

– A/C performance demonstration

• Develop J Standards

• Develop Cost/Benefit Matrix









August 18, 2005 IMAC CRP 16

Team 2

Progress to Date

• Condenser sub-cooling control study shows

potential for 20-30% improved COP at low

loads (achieving control in a vehicle system is

an open issue)

• Evaporator superheat control study shows

potential for 20% improved COP at low loads

• Improved efficiency compressor study shows

potential for 15% improved COP (climate

weighted)

• Achieving the 30% improvement goal is

promising but the individual effects may not be

additive

August 18, 2005 IMAC CRP 17

Team 3

Vehicle Load Reduction



• Goal:

– Demonstrate vehicle level

technologies that reduce the

cooling load by 30%









August 18, 2005 IMAC CRP 18

Team 3

Progress to Date

• Tested the impact of various technologies on soak

temperatures

– Power ventilation device

– Solar reflective glazing

– Lightweight insulation

– Sunscreen for windshield

• Plan to test additional technologies

– Lightweight seats

– Solar reflective paints

• Developing a computer model at the National Renewable

Energy Lab (NREL) to estimate a technology’s impact on

time to comfort and power consumption





August 18, 2005 IMAC CRP 19

NREL vehicle Model



Qsolar

CAD

Tamb

Wcomp

Tair

Tmass Solar

Cond Glazing

Qevap Radiation



Condenser Air Cabin

Expansion Device

(Orifice Tube)

MOTORElectric-Driven

Compressor

Conditioning Thermal/Fluid

Alternator

Front-End

Generator

Air Flow

Accumulator /

Evaporator

Dryer



Evaporator Air Flow Thermal

(Outside Air or Recirc.)

Vehicle

Comfort



Fuel

Economy &

Emissions Cooling Capacity Occupant

& Thermal

A/C Power Comfort



August 18, 2005 IMAC CRP 20

Team 3

Deliverables

 Procedure for evaluation of technology

 Develop a ranking of approximate

cost/benefits for various technologies

• Evaluation of technologies in laboratory and

field

 Demonstration vehicle for 2006 Phoenix

Meeting

 Communication and education materials



August 18, 2005 IMAC CRP 21

Team 4

Reduction in Refrigerant

Loss During Servicing

• Goals:

– Evaluate and Recommend Improvements for

Service Tools, Equipment (New or Revised

Standards) and Service Procedures

– Identify, Quantify and Propose Remedies for

Refrigerant Losses at Service, Vehicle End of

Life

– Quantify and Address Losses from One-Way

Refrigerant Containers

– Produce Educational Materials and Conduct

Outreach to Reduce Refrigerant Emissions

August 18, 2005 IMAC CRP 22

Team Four – Service

Progress & Plans

1. Leak detection tools, procedures

– Writing standards for next

generation of tools

– Detection at 4 grams per joint/year

(Current standard 14 grams)

– Probe distance 3/8” (now ¼”)

– ‘Real world’ testing for standard







August 18, 2005 IMAC CRP 23

Team Four – Service

Progress & Plans

2. Service equipment, procedures

– Testing has shown that current

recovery equipment/procedures

leaves refrigerant in system

– Developing standard for next

generation of equipment

– Different recovery procedures

needed for different types of

systems





August 18, 2005 IMAC CRP 24

Team Four – Service

Progress & Plans



3. Flexible coupled hose assemblies

– Conduct lab testing to evaluate field

coupled assemblies for leakage

– Develop a cost-effective means of

field evaluation of assemblies









August 18, 2005 IMAC CRP 25

Team Four – Service

Progress & Plans

4. Analytical tool to evaluate

service procedures

– SAE Service Technology Group

Activity

• Focus on leak detection; diagnosis



5. Refrigerant mass balance

– Data collection to identify and

quantify the sources of all lifetime

R-134a emissions

August 18, 2005 IMAC CRP 26

Team Four – Service

Progress & Plans



6. Vehicle end of life

– Partnership with Automotive

Recyclers Association

– Raise awareness in this sector

– Develop strategies to improve

vehicle EOL refrigerant recovery









August 18, 2005 IMAC CRP 27

Actual/Forecast Funding vs. Original Plans



• Original 2004 announcement: “over $3 million in

cash and in-kind contributions”

• Program on track to surpass initial funding plan



$ 000’s EPA Industry In-Kind Total

Funds Funds Industry

CY 2004 60 60



CY 2005 370 560 900+ 1,830



CY 2006 370? 560? 900+ 1,830



Total 740 1,180 1,800 $3,720

August 18, 2005 IMAC CRP 28

Status After One Year



• All 4 teams are operational and

making progress

• Industry participation is high

• The program is on track to meet

scope, funding and technical

targets







August 18, 2005 IMAC CRP 29



Related docs
Other docs by huanghengdong
2012_Vendor_Form_Wedding_Expo
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
SCOPE 1 GP letter v2.0 12Mar2007
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Boston_immigration_records
Views: 2  |  Downloads: 0
PSC MATRIX of achievement 080709
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Summary - CIRCA
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
ieee_wiley_ebooks_library_customer_title_list
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
2009-2010_ACC0044_fishers_772_07-dec-2009
Views: 1  |  Downloads: 0
FSP20111216-EN
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Workshops
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
By registering with docstoc.com you agree to our
privacy policy

You are almost ready to download!

You are almost ready to download!