Nanocomputers
Guided By: Submitted By:
For Download Visit http://www.nectarkunj.byethost14.com/ -1-
Nanocomputers
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 NANOCOMPUTERS
The computer has already gone through a dynamic revolution. Thirty years ago,
computers were the size of a room and incredibly slow. Few people probably would have
imagined supercomputers that can do over a trillion calculations per second. Today, the
average person's desktop computer is more powerful than the fastest computers were 30
years ago. The only way this can continue is if a new type of computer is developed.
This computer is known as a nano computer. It may one day replace the modern
computer due to many economic and scientific constraints that will one day halt the
modern computer’s advancement.
The constraints for computers come from the circuits that form them. The
most important component of a computer is its “brain”, commonly referred to as the
central processing unit. Computer chip manufacturers, such as Intel, spend billions of
dollars to build plants and do research that will allow these chips to shrink in size.
However, the costs of research and plants are increasing at a substantial rate. Once the
components of these chips come close to the size of atoms, the costs to build plants may
be in the trillions of dollars (Ellis). What's worse is nothing can become smaller than an
atom, so advances in computer speed will not be possible. However, two upsides do
exist. Scientists estimate the end will come around the year 2010, and scientists are
working on developing a nano computer (Markoff).
The earliest computers, built in the middle of the 20th century, used vacuum
tubes for switching. These machines were so massive and bulky, and demanded so much
electricity to operate, that they required buildings and power plants of their own. In
C.U.Shah College of Engg. & Tech. -2-
Nanocomputers
addition ,they used more processing power as well as much more energy . So,Scientists
needed to shrink computers to make them more powerful.as The smaller an electronic
system can be made, the more processing power can fit into a given physical volume, the
less energy is required to run it, and the faster it can work (because distances among
components are reduced, minimizing charge-carrier transit time).
But, the technology of putting circuits on silicon, the basis of current
computer chips, is reaching the natural limits of the wafers to hold circuits, turning up the
pressure for a break through. the answer for this is nanocomputing. nanocomputing deals
with building computers whose fundamental components measure only a few nanometers.
Such computers largely known as nanocomputers have their circuitry so small that it can
only be seen through a microscope.it is a computer whose physical dimensions are
microscopic.
This field of Nanocomputing is a part of emerging field of nanotechnology . So,
first of all before going any further in this topic we should clear what nanotechnology is.
NANOTECHNOLOGY
Nanotechnology is an exciting emerging science and technological field that is
making a splash in 2002. Nanotechnology involves man’s ability to create and manipulate
molecules structures to create potentially new materials, devices, machines or objects. A
nanometre is a billionth of a metre, that is, about 1/80,000 of the diameter of a human
hair, or 10 times the diameter of a hydrogen atom. . If you blew up a baseball to the size
of the earth, the atoms of the baseball would be about the size of grapes. If you could take
a ruler and measure 10 atoms side by side, you would have a nanometer. The World is on
the brink of a technological revolution beyond any human experience. It has the potential
to bring wealth, health and education to every person on the planet. And it will be able to
do this without consuming natural resources or spewing pollution into the environment.
Nanotechnology is about building things atom by atom, molecule by molecule.
The goal of nanotechnology is to build tiny devices called “nanomachines”. To
build things on such a small scale, you have to be able to manipulate atoms individually.
The challenge of nanotechnology is to place atoms precisely where you wish on a
structure.
Does this all sound like science fiction? Actually, it's based upon scientific fact.
All though we have yet to build a nanomachine, the principles nanotechnology uses are
the well established physical properties of atoms and molecules. Life itself would be
impossible without molecular machines. They are working in your body right now. For
example, consider a protein in the human body. You could think of it as a machine that
moves molecules. This is an oxygen pump used in red blood cells. The heat of other
molecules around it powers it. A channel opens periodically to the center of the protein
alloying oxygen to pass from the outside and bind with iron for transport through out the
body.
C.U.Shah College of Engg. & Tech. -3-
Nanocomputers
Scientists can now construct natural proteins and even synthesize new ones with
novel properties never seen in nature. With enough understanding, we may be able to turn
proteins into microscopic tools to do the jobs we want.
Manufactured products are made from atoms. The properties of those products
depend on how those atoms are arranged. If we rearrange the atoms in coal we can make
diamond. If we rearrange the atoms in sand (and add a few other trace elements) we can
make computer chips. If we rearrange the atoms in dirt, water and air we can make
potatoes.
Today’s manufacturing methods are very crude at the molecular level. Casting,
grinding, milling and even lithography move atoms in great thundering statistical herds.
It's like trying to make things out of LEGO blocks with boxing gloves on your hands.
Yes, you can push the LEGO blocks into great heaps and pile them up, but you can't
really snap them together the way you'd like.
In the future, Nanotechnology will let us take off the boxing gloves. We'll be able
to snap together the fundamental building blocks of nature easily, inexpensively and in
most of the ways permitted by the laws of physics. This will be essential if we are to
continue the revolution in computer hardware beyond about the next decade, and will also
let us fabricate an entire new generation of products that are cleaner, stronger, lighter, and
more precise.
It's worth pointing out that the word "Nanotechnology" has become very popular
and is used to describe many types of research where the characteristic dimensions are
less than about 1,000 nanometers. For example, continued improvements in lithography
have resulted in line widths that are less than one micron: this work is often called
"Nanotechnology." Sub-micron lithography is clearly very valuable but it is equally clear
that lithography will not let us build semiconductor devices in which individual dopant
atoms are located at specific lattice sites. Many of the exponentially improving trends in
computer hardware capability have remained steady for the last 50 years. There is fairly
widespread belief that these trends are likely to continue for at least another several years,
but then lithography starts to reach its fundamental limits. If we are to continue these
trends we will have to develop a new "post-lithographic" manufacturing technology
which will let us inexpensively build computer systems with mole quantities of logic
elements that are molecular in both size and precision and are interconnected in complex
and highly idiosyncratic patterns. Nanotechnology will let us do this.
An early promoter of the industrial applications of Nanotechnology, Albert
Franks, defined it as 'that area of science and technology where dimensions and tolerances
in the range of 0.1nm to 100 nm play a critical role'. It encompasses precision engineering
as well as electronics; electromechanical systems (eg 'lab-on-a-chip' devices) as well as
mainstream biomedical applications in areas as diverse as gene therapy, drug delivery and
novel drug discovery techniques. Nanotechnology is all about manipulating and
controlling things on a small scale.
C.U.Shah College of Engg. & Tech. -4-
Nanocomputers
Computers reproduce information at almost no cost. A push is well underway to
invent devices that manufacture at almost no cost, by treating atoms discretely, like
computers treat bits of information.This would allow automatic construction of consumer
goods without traditional labor, like a Xerox machine produces unlimited copies without
a human retyping the original information.
Electronics is fueled by miniaturization. Working smaller has led to the tools
capable of manipulating individual atoms like the proteins ina potato manipulate the
atoms of soil, air and water to make copies of itself.
The shotgun marriage of chemistry and engineering called "Nanotechnology" is
ushering in the era of self-replicating machinery and self-assembling consumer goods
made from cheap raw atoms Utilizing the well understood chemical properties of atoms
and molecules (how they "stick" together), Nanotechnology proposes the construction of
novel molecular devices possessing extraordinary properties. The trick is to manipulate
atoms individually and place them exactly where needed to produce the desired structure.
This ability is almost in our grasp. The anticipated payoff for mastering this technology is
far beyond any human accomplishment so far...
Some applications of nanotechnology which one can’t imagine in their dreams :-
Self-assembling consumer goods
Computers billions of times faster
Extremely novel inventions (impossible today)
Safe and affordable space travel
Medical Nano... virtual end to illness, aging, death
No more pollution and automatic cleanup of already existing pollution
Molecular food syntheses... end of famine and starvation
Access to a superior education for every child on Earth
Reintroduction of many extinct plants and animals
Terra forming here and the Solar System
In a world of information, digital technologies have made copying fast, cheap ,
and perfect, quite independent of cost or complexity of the content. What if the same
were to happen in the world of matter? The production cost of a ton of terabyte RAM
chips would be about the same as the production cost of steel. Design costs would matter,
production costs wouldn't.
By treating atoms as discrete, bit-like objects, molecular manufacturing will bring
a digital revolution to the production of material objects. Working at the resolution limit
of matter, it will enable the ultimate in miniaturization and performance. By starting with
cheap, abundant components--molecules-and processing them with small, high-
frequency, high-productivity machines, it will make products inexpensive. Design
computers that each execute more instructions per second than all of the semiconductor
CPUs in the world combined.
C.U.Shah College of Engg. & Tech. -5-
Nanocomputers
Taking all of this into account, it is clear that Nanotechnology should improve our
lives in any area that would benefit from the development of better, faster, stronger,
smaller, and cheaper systems.
2. DRAWBACKS OF NANOCOMPUTERS
Proponents predict that nanotechnology will ignite the industrial revolution of the
21st century, the effects of which will have a greater impact on the world’s population
than antibiotics, integrated circuits, and human-made polymers combined. Now that
scientists have the tools and are developing the skills to manipulate nature’s building
blocks, nanotech enthusiasts tout some mind-bending scenarios.
Yet some business-world skeptics wonder when nanotechnology’s promise will
translate into practical applications-or if they will at all. With a few exceptions,
nanotechnology still resides in university laboratories and corporate and government
research facilities, where scientists are devising the technology to build structures and
substances that are smaller, lighter, faster, stronger, and more efficient than more
conventional-products.
“This is pioneering new technology. It takes time for these ideas and areas to
germinate,” says Pat Dillon, a programs director at Minnesota Project Innovation Inc., a
Minneapolis organization that helps small Minnesota companies identify and capitalize
on federal research-funding opportunities. “In the meantime, people in the commercial
world are looking at what’s happening at the university level wondering, ‘How am I
going to be able to build a business around this technology? What’s the opportunity?
What’s the product? Who’s going to buy it?’”
In other words, can nanotechnology live up to its fantastic hype?WillieHendrickson is the
head of the new nanotechnologies in Rushford.This is a promising area, but we don’t
want to over-promise, or promise in an unrealistic timeframe,” says Rick Kiehl, an
electrical engineering professor at the University of Minnesota. “As with any scientific or
technological developments, if people hear too much about it too early, a sense of
disappointment inevitably builds up, and we don’t want to see that happen. The people
who expect this field to produce something tomorrow are only referring to a very small
part of it. And in my opinion, this is more of a medium- to long-range proposition.”
Unlike most technologies, which are quite specific and limited to one industry,
nanotechnology cuts across almost every imaginable industry,” Uldrich says. “My job is
to get the state focused on the future. I’m not an advocate of putting money down on one
horse and hoping it takes off; that’s like pinning the state’s hopes on picking the next
Microsoft. With nanotechnology, we’re betting on the racetrack. If we start investing in
the broad science right now, we’ll be able to position ourselves formidably in a wide
C.U.Shah College of Engg. & Tech. -6-
Nanocomputers
variety of industries-the material sciences, biomedical, telecommunications, and on and
on.”
A nanocomputer is a computer whose physical dimensions are
microscopic. Several types of nanocomputers have been suggested or proposed
by researchers and futurists .
3. TYPES OF NANOCOMPUTERS
Electronic nanocomputers would operate in a manner similar to the way present-
day microcomputers work. The main difference is one of physical scale. More and more
transistors are squeezed into silicon chips with each passing year; witness the evolution of
integrated circuits (ICs) capable of ever-increasing storage capacity and processing
power. The ultimate limit to the number of transistors per unit volume is imposed by the
atomic structure of matter. Most engineers agree that technology has not yet come close
to pushing this limit. In the electronic sense, the term Nanocomputer is relative. By 1970s
standards, today's ordinary microprocessors might be called Nanodevices.
Chemical and biochemical Nanocomputers would store and process information
in terms of chemical structures and interactions. Biochemical Nanocomputers already
exist in nature; they are manifest in all living things. But these systems are largely
uncontrollable by humans. We cannot, for example, program a tree to calculate the digits
of pi or program an antibody to fight a particular disease (although medical science has
come close to this ideal in the formulation of vaccines, antibiotics, and antiviral
medications). The development of a true chemical Nanocomputer will likely proceed
along lines similar to genetic engineering. Engineers must figure out how to get
individual atoms and molecules to perform controllable calculations and data storage
tasks.
Mechanical Nanocomputers would use tiny moving components called Nanogears
to encode information. Such a machine is reminiscent of Charles Babbage's analytical
engines of the 19th century. For this reason, mechanical Nanocomputer technology has
sparked controversy; some researchers consider it unworkable. All the problems inherent
in Babbage's apparatus, according to the naysayers, are magnified a millionfold in a
mechanical Nanocomputer. Nevertheless, some futurists are optimistic about the
technology, and have even proposed the evolution of Nanorobots that could operate, or be
controlled by, mechanical Nanocomputers.
A Quantum Nanocomputer would work by storing data in the form of
atomic quantum states or spin. Technology of this kind is already under development in
the form of single-electron memory (SEM) and quantum dots. The energy state of an
electron within an atom, represented by the electron energy level or shell, can
theoretically represent one, two, four, eight, or even 16 bits of data. The main problem
with this technology is instability. Instantaneous electron energy states are difficult to
C.U.Shah College of Engg. & Tech. -7-
Nanocomputers
predict and even more difficult to control. An electron can easily fall to a lower energy
state, emitting a photon conversely, a photon striking an atom can cause one of its
electrons to jump to a higher energy state.
3.1 ELECTRONIC NANOCOMPUTERS
The power, flexibility, and ease of manufacture of conventional microelectronic
two-state devices have been and continue to be at the heart of the revolution in computer
and information technology that has swept the world during the past half century. Among
the key properties of these solid-state devices has been that they have lent themselves to
the miniaturization of electronic devices, especially computers. First, in the 1950s and
1960s, solid state devices--transistors--replaced vacuum tubes and miniaturized all the
devices (e.g., radios, televisions, and electronic computers) that originally had been
invented and manufactured using tube technology. Then, starting in the mid-1960s,
successive generations of smaller transistors began replacing larger ones. This permitted
more transistors and more computing power to be packed in the same small space.In fact,
as noted by Gordon Moore, the founder of the Intel Corporation, the number of transistors
on a solid state silicon integrated circuit "chip" began doubling every 18 months. This
trend, now known as Moore's Law has continued to the present day. Very soon, however,
if computers are to continue to get smaller and more powerful at the same rate,
fundamentally new operational principles and fabrication technologies such as
Nanolithography will need to be employed for miniature electronic devices.
Nanolithography is used to create microscopic circuits. It is the art and science of
etching, writing, or printing at the microscopic level, where the dimensions of characters
are on the order of nanometers (units of 10-9 meter, or millionths of a millimeter). This
includes various methods of modifying semiconductor chips at the atom ic level for the
purpose of fabricating integrated circuits (IC).
Instruments used in Nanolithography include the Scanning Probe Microscope
(SPM) and the Atomic Force Microscope (AFM). The SPM allows surface viewing in
fine detail without necessarily modifying it. Either the SPM or the ATM can be used to
etch, write, or print on a surface in single-atom dimensions.
MECHANICAL COMPUTERS
Nanotechnology pioneers Eric Drexler Ralph Merkle and their
collaborators favor Nanocomputer designs that resemble miniature Babbage engines,
mechanical Nanocomputers that would calculate using moving molecular-scale rods and
rotating molecular-scale gears spinning on shafts and bearings. This idea originated in a
1959 talk entitled "There's Plenty of Room at the Bottom" presented by the late Nobel-
Prize-winning physicist Richard Feynman Feynman pointed out that such tiny machinery
was not prohibited by any known physical principle.
C.U.Shah College of Engg. & Tech. -8-
Nanocomputers
Merkle envision that these tiny machines and computers would be
assembled by the mechanical positioning of atoms or molecular building blocks one atom
or molecule at a time, a process known as ``mechanosynthesis." Once assembled, the
mechanical Nanocomputer would operate a bit like a vastly scaled down, complex
programmable versions of the mechanical calculators that were familiar office tools in the
period 1940 through 1970, preceding the introduction of widely available, inexpensive
solid-state electronic calculators. Strong arguments can be made in favor of such an
approach. For one thing, quantum mechanics assures that the molecular-scale moving
parts should not be subject to the large frictional effects that defeated earlier attempts to
build complex macroscopic mechanical computers, such as those designed by Charles
Babbage in the 1830s and 1840s. However, there are near-term drawbacks. One such
drawback is that the fabrication of such nanomechanical devices is likely to require
"hand-made" parts assembled one atom or molecular subunit at a time using STMs in
processes that are relatively slow. While this might be done, it would be tedious work to
move even a few atoms into a specific position this way, and it would be increasingly
more difficult to manufacture reliably the many precision parts for the computer. It is
possible, though, that this problem might be alleviated, somewhat, by the perfection and
evolution of recently developed STM arrays that could build many nanoscale components
in parallel. Stereospecific chemical reactions and chemical self-assembly also might be
applied to help realize a mechanical nanocomputer.
3.3 CHEMICAL & BIO-CHEMICAL COMPUTERS
In general terms, a chemical computer is one that processes information by
making and breaking chemical bonds, and it stores logic states or information in the
resulting chemical (i.e., molecular) structures. A chemical nanocomputer would perform
such operations selectively among molecules taken just a few at a time in volumes only a
few nanometers on a side. Proponents of a variant of chemical nanocomputers,
biochemically based computers, can point to an "existence proof" for them in the
commonplace activities of humans and other animals with multicellular nervous systems.
Nonetheless, artificial fabrication or implementation of this category of "natural,"
or biomimetic biochemically based computers seems far off because the mechanisms for
animal brains and nervous systems still are poorly understood. In the absence of this
deeper understanding, research on biochemically-based computers has proceeded in
alternative directions. One alternative direction has been to adapt naturally occurring
biochemicals for use in computing processes that do not occur in nature an important
example of this is.
A nanocomputer that uses DNA (deoxyribonucleic acids) to store information and
perform complex calculations. In 1994, University of Southern California computer
scientist Leonard Adelman suggested that DNA could be used to solve complex
mathematical problems. Adleman is often called the inventor of DNA computers. His
article in a 1994 issue of the journal Science outlined how to use DNA to solve a well-
C.U.Shah College of Engg. & Tech. -9-
Nanocomputers
known mathematical problem, called the Directed Hamilton Path problem, also known
as the "traveling salesman" problem. The goal of the problem is to find the shortest route
between a number of cities, going through each city only once. As you add more cities to
the problem, the problem becomes more difficult. Adleman chose to find the shortest
route between seven citie
Fig : Adelman's DNA-based computer
You could probably draw this problem out on paper and come to a solution faster than
Adleman did using his DNA test-tube computer. Here are the steps taken in the Adleman
DNA computer experiment:
Strands of DNA represent the seven cities. In genes, genetic coding is represented
by the letters A, T, C and G. Some sequence of these four letters represented each city
and possible flight path.
These molecules are then mixed in a test tube, with some of these DNA strands
sticking together. A chain of these strands represents a possible answer.
Within a few seconds, all of the possible combinations of DNA strands, which
represent answers, are created in the test tube.
Adleman eliminates the wrong molecules through chemical reactions,which
leaves behind only the flight paths that connect all seven cities.
The success of the Adleman DNA computer proves that DNA can be used to
calculate complex mathematical problems. However, this early DNA computer is far
from challenging silicon-based computers in terms of speed. The Adleman DNA
computer created a group of possible answers very quickly, but it took days for Adleman
to narrow down the possibilities. Another drawback of his DNA computer is that it
requires human assistance. The goal of the DNA computing field is to create a device
that can work independent of human involvement.
C.U.Shah College of Engg. & Tech. - 10 -
Nanocomputers
Three years after Adleman's experiment, researchers at the University of
Rochester developed logic gates made of DNA. Logic gates are a vital part of how your
computer carries out functions that you command it to do. These gates convert binary
code moving through the computer into a series of signals that the computer uses to
perform operations. Currently, logic gates interpret input signals from silicon transistors
and convert those signals into an output signal that allows the computer to perform
complex functions.
The Rochester team's DNA logic gates are the first step toward creating a
computer that has a structure similar to that of an electronic PC instead of using electrical
signals to perform logical operations, these DNA logic gates rely on DNA code. They
detect fragments of genetic material as input, splice together these fragments and form a
single output. For instance, a genetic gate called the "And gate" links two DNA inputs by
chemically binding them so they're locked in an end-to-end structure, similar to the way
two Legos might be fastened by a third Lego between them. The researchers believe that
these logic gates might be combined with DNA microchips to create a breakthrough in
DNA computing.
DNA computer components -- logic gates and biochips -- will take years to develop
into a practical, workable DNA computer. If such a computer is ever built, scientists say
that it will be more compact, accurate and efficient than conventional computers. In the
next section, we'll look at how DNA computers could surpass their silicon-based
predecessors, and what tasks these computers would perform.
The main benefit o using DNA computers to solve complex problems is that different
possible solutions are created all at once. This is known as parallel processing .Humans
and most electronic computers must attempt to solve the problem one process at a time
(linear processing). DNA itself provides the added benefits of being a cheap, energy-
efficient resource.
In a different perspective, more than 10 trillion DNA molecules can fit into an area no
larger than 1 cubic centimeter. With this, a DNA computer could hold 10 terabytes of
data and perform 10 trillion calculations at a time.
3.4 QUANTUM NANOCOMPUTERS
3..4.1 BASIC TERMS
1) Quantum-Computer :
A quantum computer is a machine, as-yet hypothetical, that performs calculations
based on the behavior of particles at the sub-atomic level. Such a computer will be, if it is
ever developed, capable of executing far more millions of instructions per
second (MIPS) than any previous computer.
2) Qubits :
C.U.Shah College of Engg. & Tech. - 11 -
Nanocomputers
Engineers have coined the term qubit (pronounced KYEW-bit) to denote the
fundamental data unit in a quantum computer. A qubit is essentially a bit (binary digit)
that can take on several, or many, values simultaneously.
3) Teleportation :
Teleportation involves dematerializing an object at one point, and sending the
details of that object's precise atomic configuration to another location, where it will be
reconstructed. What this means is that time and space could be eliminated from travel --
we could be transported to any location instantly, without actually crossing a physical
distance.
4) Quantum mechanics :
As the name implies, a quantum computer involves quantum mechanics. A
quantum computer uses subatomic particles, such as electrons and protons, to solve
problems. According to quantum mechanics, electrons can be in many different places
and many different states all at the same instance in time (Carey A1). The possibility that
an electron can be anywhere or be in different states is supposed to make quantum
computers extremely fast (Carey A1). This along with other laws of quantum mechanics
present the most challenges for building quantum computers.
3.4.2 INTRODUCTION
Recently, there has been serious interest in the possibility of fabricating and
applying nanoscale quantum computers. In a quantum computer, it is proposed that
massively parallel computations can be performed through the ``natural" mechanism of
interference among the quantum waves associated with the nanoscale components of a
multicomponent, coherent quantum state. Proposed quantum computers would represent
each bit of information as a quantum state of some component of the computer, e.g., the
spin orientation of an atom. According to quantum mechanics, the state of each nanoscale
component of a system can be represented by a wave. These quantum matter waves are
analogous to light waves, except that their wavelengths tend to be much shorter, in
inverse proportion to the momentum of the quantized component. Thus, the quantum
waves can be manipulated in the space of only a few nanometers, unlike most light of
moderate, nondestructive energy, which has wavelengths of several hundred nanometers.
By carefully setting up the states for the components of the quantum system, a desired
computation is performed through the wave interference among the quantized
components. All discrete computational path would be considered at once, at the speed of
light, through the wave interference patterns--fast, intrinsic parallel computation. Given
the correct initial preparation of the entire multicomponent computational system,
constructive interference among the components' waves would emphasize those wave
patterns which correspond to correct solutions to the problem, and destructive
interference would weed out the incorrect solutions.
C.U.Shah College of Engg. & Tech. - 12 -
Nanocomputers
The idea for a quantum computer is based upon the work of Paul Benioff in the
early 1980s and that of David Deutsch and Richard Feynman, in the mid-1980s. Although
quantum computers originally were proposed as a theoretical construct for considering
the limits of computation, some researchers have suggested that fundamentally hard and
economically important problems could be solved much more rapidly using quantum
interference and parallelism. In particular, Peter Shor has proven that a quantum
computer could factor large numbers very rapidly and thereby, perhaps, provide
cryptographers with a powerful new tool with which to crack difficult codes. Some
proposals have been made for implementing such a computer. Seth Lloyd, in particular,
has attracted much attention recently with a mechanism he has proposed for the practical
implementation of quantum computers. There have been some quantitative arguments,
though, that cast doubts upon the specifics and the ultimate utility of Lloyd's proposals.
More general reservations about proposed quantum computers include the fact that they
would have to be assembled and initialized with great and unprecedented precision.
Quantum computers would be very sensitive to extremely small physical distortions and
stray photons, which would cause the loss of the phase coherence in the multicomponent
quantum state. Thus, they would have to be carefully isolated from all external effects and
operated at temperatures very close to absolute zero. Even then, some errors are likely to
be an intrinsic problem, though they do not rule out the eventual application of quantum
computers to solve certain classes of difficult problems.
3.4.3 QUANTUM BASICS
For a non-scientist, understanding how quantum computing works is darn near
impossible. But the basics are worth taking a stab at.
Atoms have a natural spin or orientation, in the way a needle on a compass has an
orientation. The spin can either be up or down. That coincides nicely with digital
technology, which represents everything by a series of 1s and 0s. With an atom, a spin
pointing up can be 1; down can be 0. Flipping the spin up or down could be like flipping
the switch on and off (or between 1 and 0) on a tiny transistor.
So far so good. But here's one of the weird parts, which also is the source of
quantum computing's great power. An atom, which is not visible to the naked eye, can be
both up and down at the same time until you measure it. The act of measuring it --
whether using instruments or a powerful microscope -- forces it to choose between up or
down.
Don't ask why it works that way. It's part of quantum mechanics, which is a set of
laws -- like Einstein's theory of relativity -- that govern the universe. In this case, the laws
govern the tiniest objects in the universe. Quantum mechanics is entirely unlike anything
in the world of ordinary experiences. The laws are so bizarre they seem made up. Yet
they've been proven time and again.
Since an atom can be up and down at once -- called putting it into a superposition --
C.U.Shah College of Engg. & Tech. - 13 -
Nanocomputers
it's not just equal to one bit, as in a traditional computer. It's something else. Scientists
call it a qubit. If you put a bunch of qubits together, they don't do calculations linearly like
today's computers. They are, in a sense, doing all possible calculations at the same time --
in a way, straddling all the possible answers. The act of measuring the qubits stops the
calculating process and forces them to settle on an answer.
Forty qubits could have the power of one of today's supercomputers. A supercomputer
trying to find one phone number in a database of all the world's phone books would take a
month, Chuang says. A quantum computer could do it in 27 minutes.
3.4.4 QUANTUM NANOCOMPUTER VERSUS CLASSICAL COMPUTER
The only similarity a quantum computer should have to an ordinary computer is
usefulness. A quantum computer will not be a machine in a box; instead it may look
like some big magnets surrounded by other stuff. A quantum computer may differ from a
modern computer in other ways also. For example, a quantum computer may not have
the permanent data storage a modern computer has with a hard drive. However, a
quantum computer will certainly need a device similar to a monitor in order to be of any
use to an average person. The composition of a quantum computer helps give it many
advantages.
Scientists are trying to develop a quantum computer due to its potential. A
quantum computer is supposed to be able to solve a problem all at once instead of in steps
(Markoff). A modern computer takes a problem and quickly solves a single step then
moves on to the next one. If there are trillions of things to search through, like every
word on the Internet, this can be extremely slow (Markoff). However, a quantum
computer would be exponentially faster than a modern computer.
A quantum computer shows no resemblance to a modern computer.
Perhaps an even more useful task for the quantumcomputer involves factoring
numbers.
Modern computers have been used a lot for factoring large numbers.
"The largest number ever known to have been factorized had 129 digits. It took a
network of supercomputers working in parallel eight months to find the answer! To
factorize a 1,000-digit number would take our most powerful conventional
supercomputers more than the estimated 100 billion years the universe has left to run"
(Ellis). Factoring large numbers is known as cryptography (Ellis). It is used to secure
things over the Internet such as financial transactions and email (Ellis). However, "a
quantum computer would break the most sophisticated code in no time flat" (Ellis). This
C.U.Shah College of Engg. & Tech. - 14 -
Nanocomputers
basically means someone could intercept someone else's email messages. A quantum
computer's potential goes beyond cryptography.
A quantum computer may prove useful in the math and physics. A
quantum computer would be fast enough for physicists to do computer
simulations of nuclear explosions and other physical processes (Powell).
A quantum computer could enable mathematicians to solve seemingly impossible
problems. While these two things might not sound great for people outside the
scientific community, a quantum computer will probably be more useful for
things that seem impossible.
One thing that scientists have deemed possible is teleportation (Hall).
However, teleportation has many problems and challenges in front of it just like
the quantum computer. Because teleportation uses quantum physics, the
development of the quantum computer may help scientists learn more to solve
problems related to teleportation. Fortunately, researchers have made some
progress developing a quantum computer.
Two physicists, Neil Gershenfield and Isaac Chuang, have built a very basic
quantum computer (Winters 94). They were able to solve two simple problems.
They used liquid alanine to solve the problem one plus one (Winters 94). They
were able to solve another problem in liquid chloroform (Markoff). This
problem was to select a correct telephone number given four different numbers
(Winters 94). The physicists hope to be able to make a more complex quantum
computer that is able to factor 15 into 5 and 3 (Winters 95). While all of these
tasks are simple for a modern computer, the process to solve the problem was
done differently than it would have been done on a modern computer. All
possible answers were checked at the same time, compared to checking each
answer until the correct one was found (Markoff).
3.4.5 QUANTUM NANO-ENCRYPTION
Quantum encryption pioneers promise to put the world's first uncrackably secure
networks online by early 2003. Based on the quantum properties of photons, quantum
encryption guarantees absolutely secure optical communications.
Three independent experiments recently have demonstrated such systems.
Geneva-based id Quantique SA encoded a secure transmission on a 70-kilometer fiber-
optic link in Europe; MajiQ Technologies Inc., here, used a 30-km link; and researchers
at Northwestern University (Evanston, Ill.) demonstrated a 250-Mbit/second quantum
encrypted transmission over a short link.
"Our quantum random-number generator and our single-photon detector module
are available now and are in use by several customers around the world," said Gregoire
Ribordy, a manager at id Quantique. A beta version of a third product, a quantum-key
distribution system, "has been fully tested, and we are in advanced discussions with
several potential launch customers," he added.
C.U.Shah College of Engg. & Tech. - 15 -
Nanocomputers
3.4.6 SECURING THE INTERNET
For its part, MagiQ says that its Navajo system is currently at the alpha stage and
promises real beta sites on selected campuses in the United States in the first quarter.
Both companies are also talking about secure through-the-air communications with
satellites.
Northwestern, meanwhile, vows to have a 2.5-Gbit/s quantum- technology
encryption capable of securing the Internet backbone in five years. It says that
commercial partners are working with the technology.
There is strong interest in quantum encryption because of its ability to completely
eliminate the possibility of eavesdropping. Today encryption/decryption methods are only
as good as the length of the key - a 56- to 256-bit value used to scramble the data to be
transmitted with a one-way function - that's used to encrypt a message. A common way to
create such a one-way function is to multiply two large prime numbers, a simple
operation for a computer to perform. However, going backward - that is, taking a large
number and finding its prime factors - is very difficult for computers to execute.
Other methods use some hard mathematical problem to create one-way functions,
but any scheme of that kind is vulnerable both to advances in computational power and
new breakthroughs in mathematics.
3.4.7 APPLICATIONS OF QUANTUM NANOCOMPUTING
Quantum computers might prove especially useful in the following applications :
Breaking ciphers
Statistical analysis
Factoring large numbers
Solving problems in theoretical physics
Solving optimization problems in many variables
3.4.8 DISADVANTAGES OF QUANTUM NANOCOMPUTING
The technology needed to build a quantum computer is currently beyond our
reach. This is due to the fact that the coherent state, fundamental to a quantum computers
operation, is destroyed as soon as it is measurably affected by its environment. Attempts
at combatting this problem have had little success, but the hunt for a practical solution
continues.
C.U.Shah College of Engg. & Tech. - 16 -
Nanocomputers
4. FUTURE SCOPE OF NANOTECHNOLOGY
Here's a date for your diary November 1st, 2011. According to a group of
researchers calling themselves the Nanocomputer Dream Team, that's the day they'll
unveil a revolutionary kind of computer, themost powerful ever seen. Their
nanocomputer will be made out of atoms.
First suggested by Richard Feynman in 1959, the idea of nanotechnology,
constructing at the atomic level, is now a major research topic worldwide. Theoreticians
have already come up with designs for simple mechanical structures like bearings, hinges,
gears and pumps, each made from a few collections of atoms. These currently exist only
as computer simulations, and the race is on to fabricate the designs and prove that they
can work.
Moving individual atoms around at will sounds like fantasy, but it's already been
demonstrated in the lab. In 1989, scientists at IBM used an electron microscope to shuffle
35 xenon atoms into the shape of their company's logo. Since then a team at IBM's Zurich
labs has achieved the incredible feat of creating a working abacus on the atomic scale.
C.U.Shah College of Engg. & Tech. - 17 -
Nanocomputers
Each bead is a single molecule of buckminsterfullerene (a buckyball), comprising
60 atoms of carbon linked into a football shape. The beads slide up and down a copper
plate, nudged by the tip of an electron microscope.
The Nanocomputer Dream Team wants to use these techniques to build an atomic
computer. Such a computer, they say can then be used to control simple molecular
construction machines, which can then build more complex molecular devices, ultimately
giving complete control of the molecular world.
The driving force behind the Dream Team is Bill Spence, publisher of
Nanotechnology magazine. Spence is convinced that the technology can be made to work,
and has enlisted the help of over 300 enthusiasts with diverse backgrounds - engineers,
physicists, chemists, programmers and artificial intelligence researchers. The whole team
has never met, and probably never will. They communicate by email and pool their ideas
on the Web. There's only one problem. Nobody is quite sure how to build a digital
nanocomputer.
The most promising idea is rod logic, invented by nanotechnology pioneer Eric
Drexler, now chairman of the leading nano think tank The Foresight Institute. Rod logic
uses stiff rods made from short chains of carbon atoms. Around each rod sits a knob
made of a ring of atoms. The rods are fitted into an interlocking lattice, where each rod
can slide between two positions, and be reset by a spring made of another few atoms.
Drexler has shown how to use such an arrangement to achieve the effect of a
conventional electronic transistor, where the flow of current in one wire is switched on
and off by current in a different wire. Once you have transistors, you can build a NAND
gate. From NAND gates you can construct every other logic elements a computer needs.
C.U.Shah College of Engg. & Tech. - 18 -
Nanocomputers
Apart from the immensely difficult problem of physically piecing together these
molecular structures, massive calculations are required to determine if particular
molecular configurations are even possible. The Dream Team will perform these
molecular simulation calculations using metacomputing where each person's PC performs
a tiny part of the overall calculation, and the results are collated on the Web. There are
already prototype tools for experimenting with molecular configurations, such as
NanoCAD, a freeware nano design system including Java source code.
This may all sound like pie in the sky, but there's serious research and
development money being spent on nanotechnology. A recent survey counted over 200
companies and university research groups working in the field. And April 1997 saw the
foundation of Zyvex, the world's first nanotechnology manufacturing company. Zyvex's
goal is to build an assembler, the basic element required for nanotechnology. The
assembler will itself be a machine made from molecules, fitted with atom sized tools for
manipulating other molecules to build other machines. It will also be capable of
replicating itself from the materials around it.
While they may lack any actual working prototypes of their technology,
nanotechnologists are certainly not short of ideas. Once you have the ability to make
molecular machines, the possibilities are amazing and often bizarre. One idea is utility
fog, where billions of submicroscopic molecular robots each containing a nanocomputer
are linked together to form a solid mass. Controlled by a master nanocomputer, the robots
could alter their configurations to create any object you like.
C.U.Shah College of Engg. & Tech. - 19 -
Nanocomputers
Nanotechnology does come with one tiny drawback, however. What happens if a
molecular machine goes haywire, and instead of building, starts demolishing the
molecules around it? The world would quite literally fall apart.
Nanocomputers, if they ever appear, will be extraordinary things. But if, like most
computer systems, they have bugs, they could also be very nasty indeed.
C.U.Shah College of Engg. & Tech. - 20 -
Nanocomputers
5. APPLICATIONS OF NANOCOMPUTERS
5.1 NANOSPACE
Space science as long played a role in the research and development of advancing
technologies. Spacecraft are being launched, with hulls that are composed of carbon
fibers, a light weight high strength material. Combine that with smaller on board
computers that perform hundreds of times faster than computers used on spacecraft just a
decade ago and one can see the why of incredible advances in space exploration in just
the past few years. The advancements in material science and computer science have
allowed the building, launching and deploying of space exploration systems that
continually do more and more as they become smaller and lighter.
Some of the latest avenues being explored, that are more in the nano realm, in
space science, include smart materials for the hulls of spacecraft. These would be
materials primarily composed of nanotube fibers with nano sized computers integrated
into them. These materials along with being even lighter will also be far stronger too. One
idea is to create a surface that will help transfer the aerodynamic forces working on a
spacecraft during launch. When the craft is launched the nano computers will flex the
crafts hull to offset pressure differences in the hull caused by the crafts acceleration
through the atmosphere. Then the same nano computer network in the hull would go to
work heating the shaded side of the craft and cooling the sun exposed side and to even
create heat shielding for reentry. To equalize the surface temperature now, a spacecraft
must be kept rotating and although a slight spin is good in maintaining the attitude of a
craft somtimes it interferes with the mission plan, like when a spacecraft is taking
photographs or is in the process of docking with another craft, also now upon reentry
spacecraft have to be oriented just right. With a smart material hull ablationing materials
could be gathered in real time obviating any crucial departures in mission landing plans.
Another avenue being investicated is a concept of nano robotics called
"Swarms". Swarms are nano robots that act in unison like bees. They theoretically, will
act as a flexible cloth like material and being composed of what's called Bucky tubes, this
cloth will be as strong as diamond. Add to this cloth of nano machines nano computers
and you have smart cloth. This smart cloth could be used to keep astronauts from
bouncing around inside their spacecraft while they sleep, a problem that arises when the
auto pilot computer fires the course correction rockets. The cloth like material will be
able to offset the sudden movements and slowly move the sleeping astronaut back into
position. Still another application for the nano robot swarms, being considered, is that the
smart cloth could be used in the astronauts space suits. This material will not only be
capable of repairing itself quickly or controlling the environment inside the suit but it will
be able to communicate with it's wearer what it is doing and what's going on outside the
suit. On the planet Mars for example a suit made of smart cloth could extract oxygen
from the carbon dioxide in the atmosphere for the wearer. The same suit could extract
solar energy to power the suit.
C.U.Shah College of Engg. & Tech. - 21 -
Nanocomputers
This suit would also literally be a life saver on Earth. Imagine a fire fighter
wearing a suit that could extract Oxygen from the environment he is in. "Foam Swarms"
not even as a suit but sprayed from a container about like the average sized hand held fire
extinguisher could be used to extract and store dangerous toxins and flamables. The smart
foam under the control of a fire fighter would act as a portable environment that would
engulf any victims found, protecting them from heat and toxic gas, and supply them with
oxygen. The Smart foam would be able to shape some of itself into a suit for the victim
and begin to monitor the victims vitals and even be able to report to an on site, or by
wireless satellite communication, off site medic or doctor the condition of the victim
including broken bones etc. The smart suit could even upon sensing a broken bone begin
to reinforce and create on the spot a cast, a cast that would be able to act on the damaged
bone so the victim could walk out on a broken leg. The smart foam would also be able to
utilize different stratagies to dissipate heat, for example, it could shape itself into a
radiator so as to dump heat away from the fire fighters and victims.
A space suit is nothing more nor less than an incredible space ship itself so this same
smart cloth could be the super structure of a deep space probe replete with an on board
A.I computer capable of creating the science experiments needed enroute to its
destination and capable of not only making changes in mission plans but creating even
new experiments as they are needed or wanted. The same super explorer could even
create its own solar energy gathering panels if appropriate or utilizing R.T.G technology
with plutonium also it will be able to repair itself. And while all of the above is going on
the craft could even expand it's own computing capabilities if need be.
Another application of nano robots would be in carrying out construction projects in
hostile environments, for example with just a handfull, of self replicating robots, utilizing
local materials, and local energy it's conceivable that space habitats can be completely
constructed by remote control so that the inhabitants need only show up with their
suitcases. Colonization of space begins to make economic sense then, since it would only
take one saturn type rocket to create a complete space colony on mars, for example. An
engineer or a team of engineers could check up on the construction of the habitat via
telepresents utilizing cameras and sensors created on the surface of Mars by the nano bots
all from the comfortable confines of Earth. Then once the habitat is complete humans can
show up to orchestrate the expansion of the exploration. Venus could be explored with
nano robots too. Super Hulls could be fashioned by nano robots to withstand the intense
pressures and corrosive gases of the venusian atmosphere, to safely house nano robot
built sensors and equiptment. The potential in all of this is getting a lot more space
exploraton accomplished with less investment of resources and a lot less danger to human
explorers.
C.U.Shah College of Engg. & Tech. - 22 -
Nanocomputers
5.2 CANCEL CANCER
1)
Provide a brief history of the science that led to the development of the
technical application the team has selected. Explain the problem your
team has selected.
Nanotechnology was first proposed on December 29th 1959 by Richard Feynman in
his speech, "There's Plenty of Room at the Bottom." He gave this speech at the annual
meeting of the American Physical Society at the California Institute of Technology. In his
speech he stated " I am not afraid to consider the final question as to whether,
ultimately-in the great future-we can arrange the atoms the way we want; the very
atoms, all the waydown!" Feynman stated that the laws of physics do not prevent us
from manipulating individual atoms or molecules. The only limitation they had was no
appropriate method to do so. He also predicted that at some point in time, the methods for
atomic manipulation would be available. Feynman declared that we should use the
bottom-up approach instead of the top-down approach. The top-down approach would
modify the shape and size of materials to meet specific needs for assembly of these
materials. The bottom-up approach would produce components made of single molecules
held together by covalent bonds, which are much stronger than the forces that hold
together macro-components. By using the bottom-up approach, the amount of
information that can be stored in devices would be incredible.
However, it wasn’t until 1974 that Norio Taniguchi created the term
“Nanotechnology” at the University of Tokyo. Taniguchi distinguished engineering at the
micrometer scale from a new, sub-micrometer level, which he called "nano-technology."
In 1981, Gerd Binnig and Heinrich Rohrer invented the Scanning Tunneling
Microscope (STM) at IBM’s Zurich Research Laboratory and later created the Atomic
Force Microscope in 1986. With the discovery of these two inventions they could not
only photograph individual atoms, but could actually move the atom around. In addition,
John Foster of IBM Almaden labs was able to spell “IBM” with 35 xenon atoms on a
nickel using Scanning Tunneling Microscope to control the atoms.
The investigation of nanotechnology expanded in 1985 when Professor Richard
Smalley, Robert Curl, Jr., and Harold Kroto discovered a new form of carbon, which was
a molecule of sixty carbon atoms. This supercarbon has become one of a growing number
of building blocks for a new class of nano-sized products. Then, eleven years later, they
won the Nobel Prize.
In 1986, Eric Drexler wrote Engines of Creation. It dealt with the concept of
molecular manufacturing and included a full-length examination of the possibilities of
C.U.Shah College of Engg. & Tech. - 23 -
Nanocomputers
nanotechnology. He proposed the idea of universal assemblers, robotic type machines,
which form the basis of molecular manufacturing. Therefore, it will allow us to build
anything atom-by-atom, molecule by molecule, using an “assembler” that is controlled
by a computer to move the atoms where you desire. As he began to explain this theory, he
stated “In biology, enzymes stick molecules together in new patterns all the time. In
every cell, there are programmable, numerically controlled machine tools that
manufacture protein molecules according to genetic instructions. If you can build
one molecular machine, then you can use it to build an even better molecular
machine.”
In the spring of 1988, Eric Drexler taught the first formal course in
nanotechnology while visiting Stanford University. He suggested the possibility of nano-
sized objects that are self- duplicating robots or nanomachines that would roam around in
the body killing cancer cells.
Drexler received a doctorate degree in the field of nanotechnology from MIT in
1991. In 1992, he published another book called Nanosystems to provide a graduate level
introduction to the physical and engineering standards of the field.
The publication of an issue of Scientific American that focused on
nanotechnology in September 2001 is considered a milestone. The June 15 and July 1
issues of Red Herring were also considered milestones.
There were many scientific advances that led to the concept of nanotechnology.
Many contributors helped with the theory, such as Feyman giving his speech or Drexler
teaching a course. Nanotechnology will have many more improvements in the future and
will benefit our society
2)
Identify two scientists or engineers that have made major contributions
to this technical application.
Shuming Nie has made a very major contribution to the field where medicine and
nanotechnology meet. Nie’s work has shown that Nano particles can be used to detect
cancer at its early stages. The use of his latest technology on molecules that are linked
with cancer may be the key to improved cancer detection, which in turn will save
thousands of lives.
Nie’s latest technology involves the use of quantum dots. He work, in a way,
color-codes biological molecules, such as genes and proteins, allowing doctors or
physicians to see and identify the exact location of selected molecules in the cells and
tissues of a living person. This technology works through several steps and series. The
fluorescent quantum dots that conduct little electricity are implanted inside micron-sized
polystyrene beads. The different colors are produced because of the varying sizes and
quantities of the dots that are embedded into the beads. Shuming Nie then attaches these
beads to biological molecules such as antibodies or proteins and then applies them to
C.U.Shah College of Engg. & Tech. - 24 -
Nanocomputers
cells and tissue samples in the laboratory. These antibodies attached to the beads will then
hold on or stick to specific molecules. This makes identifying the location and figuring
out the number of these molecules that are present easier. This technique, when targeted
at cancer cells, allows us to see whether or not cancer cells are present.
However, Drexler cannot be given all the credit, for he learned from the best,
Richard Feyman. Drexler was a one-time student of Feyman. Drexler is considered to be
the founding father of nanotechnology, as we know it today because he had many ideas
concerning molecular engineering and manufacturing. The ideas of molecular
engineering brought up by Drexler are mentioned in a paper of his named “Engines of
Creation.” It is in this paper that Drexler laid down the possible foundations of
nanotechnology.
Linking every-day objects to atoms and molecules on a molecular level may help
us to understand Drexler’s concepts better. One can visualize an atom to be a physical
object, such as a marble. A molecule which is quite complex is a clump of atoms that are
joined together or linked. This fairly complex molecule can be considered as a group of
marble joining to be the size of a fist. According to the different chemical properties of
the various atoms, their bonds will “snap” and “unsnap.” The molecule’s shape is formed
similarly to how children build toys with things like Erector Sets. The molecule’s
functions and shape will be familiar things such as levers, gears, motors, and pulleys.
Drexler proposed the supposition that a submicroscopic device could be created
from some type of atoms. This device would have a robotic limb controlled by a
computer, that would be able to move around atoms and position them exactly and
precisely where the robot wanted them to be. This type of robotic limb is called an
“assembler”. These “assemblers” are similar to enzymes in biology that adhere molecules
together in new patterns all the time. If one of these molecular devices could be built,
then that device could be used to build even better ones.
These molecular machines are made so precisely, down to the most minuscule
details. Because their parts are so much smaller than the everyday things that we are used
to, they are a million times faster than the moving parts that we are familiar with. Even
though a single nanomachine would be incredibly fast and precise, they could not be able
to change anything for something large like the human, due to the fact that nanomachines
are so small. This is why many of these little nanomachines would be needed at the same
time in order to do something for a human being. The way we would get so many of these
machines is by programming the machines how to reproduce or replicate themselves.
One molecular machine alone can replicate itself in an expedient manner by with
simply fuels and some other raw materials which can be found in the first machine itself.
The new molecular machi robot wanted them to be. This type of robotic limb is called an
“assembler”. These “assemblers” are similar to enzymes in biology that adhere
molecules together in new patterns all the time. If one of these molecular devices could
be built, then that device could be used to build even better ones.
C.U.Shah College of Engg. & Tech. - 25 -
Nanocomputers
These molecular machines are made so precisely, down to the most minuscule
details. Because their parts are so much smaller than the everyday things that we are used
to, they are a million times faster than the moving parts that we are familiar with. Even
though a single nanomachine would be incredibly fast and precise, they could not be able
to change anything for something large like the human, due to the fact that nanomachines
are so small. This is why many of these little nanomachines would be needed at the same
time in order to do something for a human being. The way we would get so many of these
machines is by programming the machines how to reproduce or replicate themselves.
One molecular machine alone can replicate itself in an expedient manner by with
simply fuels and some other raw materials which can be found in the first machine itself.
The new molecular machine would then be able to replicate itself too. With each new
nanomachine replicating itself, there would be a whole group of nanomachines that can
then carry out complex procedures. These procedures include making anything
imaginable. These nanomachines can make almost anything as long as they have enough
fuels and raw materials with energy costs that are minimized.
Drexler also came up with an idea on building nanocomputers. His
nanocomputers would not work electrically, but it would have several mechanical parts in
motion. These computers would be reasonably quicker working than the computers of
today. It will be faster due to the fact that the information inside the computer only has to
move such tiny spaces. Therefore, these nanocomputers will be able to understand one
billion instructions a second. Drexler says, “Eventually the whole integrated circuit
technology base is going to be replaced.”
In addition, Drexler foresaw the great things that nanotechnology can help
accomplish in the field of medicine. The highly intelligent nanocomputers that were
before mentioned can enact a most important role in many areas of medicine. Software
composed of artificial intelligence would allow surgical procedures to be incredibly
precise on a molecular level. However, the most interesting thing is that Drexler himself
said that the simplest use of nanotechnology in medicine would be the destruction of
selective cells or other things in the body, which is akin to the project our team has
selected. We are using nanotechnology to destroy only cancerous cells and not healthy
ones.
3)
Describe in detail how the technical application the team selected
impacts the problem outlined in Component One.
The use of Cancel Cancer will dramatically decrease the death rate of people all
over the world. It will save many lives and raise the hopes of infected patient’s families
and friends. Cancel Cancer will replace chemotherapy and other means of treating cancer.
Some benefits of using Cancel Cancer compared to chemotherapy are that it won’t leave
the patient with a weakened immune system or extremely exhausted. Also, it will only
kill cancerous cells and not harm the healthy cells. However, by simply drinking a
solution containing nano devices, the side-effects of chemotherapy will be diminished.
C.U.Shah College of Engg. & Tech. - 26 -
Nanocomputers
4)
Identify the limitations and benefits of using the technical application
the team has selected to solve the problem.
The nano device that we plan to build will bring many benefits to not just
medicine, but to millions of people living on this Earth. First of all, just the hope of early
cancer detection and better ways of treatment can brighten the spirits of the many cancer
patients and their close ones. However, this device is not only going to lift people’s
hopes, but it will enhance cancer treatment greatly.
Since our device will allow doctors to single out only cancerous cells, it will not
destroy the healthy ones. This will be a big progression in the treatment of cancer because
one of the most popular treatments for cancer was chemotherapy. In chemotherapy,
radiation was would kill the cancerous cells in the body, but the healthy ones would also
be destroyed. This would leave patients tired and extremely weak. It would also leave the
patient with a weakened immune system, when their immune system was very weak due
to cancer in the first place. However, with the precise destruction of only cancerous cells,
this could be prevented or at least greatly decreased. Also, in chemotherapy, some people
would have the side-affects with no benefits. They would be incredibly exhausted and
there would be no improvements in their cancer. Our project will dispose of these
troubles and cancer will no longer be an incurable disease, but will become more like an
extinct disease.
For chemotherapy, a patient is required to visit a clinic everyday, which is very
expensive. Our project will remove these hassles. Once you’ve been treated, you’re
completely cured and there is no need to go back and forth.
Although there are many benefits to curing cancer with nanotechnology, there are
also many limitations. More than 1700 people die from cancer every day in the United
States and Canada. With our new invention, many more people will be cured from cancer,
leaving the population to dramatically increase. When the population rises, there will be
overcrowding in a world that is already overcrowded. There won’t be enough food, water,
or resources for humans to survive.
In addition, there are thousands of chemotherapists who help with the curing of
cancer. These chemotherapists will most likely lose their job with the making of our
invention. Many companies will go out of business due to the fact that our invention will
be an improved and better way to treat cancer.
There is also the possibility that our machine will malfunction and even cause
harm to the patient. This will cause enormous dilemmas because it is placing the patient’s
life in grave danger. If the patient is injured or dies, the tragedy will most definitely affect
the patient’s family and friends.
C.U.Shah College of Engg. & Tech. - 27 -
Nanocomputers
5.3 BIO-NANOTECHNOLOGY
Implications for Designing More Effective Tissue Engineering Materials
Nanotechnology can be defined as using materials and systems whose structures
and components exhibit novel and significantly changed properties by gaining control of
structures at the atomic, molecular, and supramolecular levels. Although many advanced
properties for materials with constituent fiber, grain, or particle sizes less than 100 nm
have been observed for traditional science and engineering applications (such as in
catalytic, optical, mechanical, magnetic, and electrical applications), few advantages for
the use of these materials in tissue-engineering applications have been explored.
However, nanophase materials may give researchers control over interactions with
biological entities (such as proteins and cells) in ways previously unimaginable with
conventional materials. This is because organs of the body are nanostructures and, thus,
cells in the body are accustomed to interacting with materials that have nanostructured
features. Despite this fact, implants currently being investigated as the next-generation of
tissue-engineering scaffolds have micron-structured features. In this light, it is not
surprising why the optimal tissue-engineering material has not been found to date.
Over the past two years, Purdue has provided significant evidence to the research
community that nanophase materials can be designed to control interactions with proteins
and subsequently mammalian cells for more efficient tissue regeneration. This has been
demonstrated for a wide range of nanophase material chemistries including ceramics,
polymers, and more recently metals. Such investigations are leading to the design of a
number of more successful tissue-engineering materials for orthopedic/dental, vascular,
neural, bladder, and cartilage applications. In all applications, compared to conventional
materials, the fundamental design parameter necessary to increase tissue regeneration is a
surface with a large degree of biologically-inspired nanostructured roughness. In this
manner, results from the present collection of studies have added increased tissue-
regeneration as another novel property of nanophase materials.
5.4 NANOMETROLOGY
Nanometrology involves high precision measurement techniques combined with
nano-positioning systems to measure:
Capabilities and applications in nanometrology are based on Differential Capacitance
Micrometry.Current applications in Nanometrology are :
Precision Deformation Measurement
C.U.Shah College of Engg. & Tech. - 28 -
Nanocomputers
Tectonics
Mining
Precision Displacement Measurement
Gravity Gradiometer
The Capacitance Micrometry technology was originally developed in the mid
seventies and uses relative position measurement within a locally defined reference
standard. It can be configured to allow picometre resolution over a one hundred micron
range or used at lower resolution over larger dynamic range.
The current measurement systems feature are :
Ratiometric resolution to approximately 1 in 108 of the selected range reference length
Worst case non linearity against laser reference is < 10-5 over 0.4 of reference
range
Large dynamic range e.g. 10mm-100µm
Long term stability - high repeatability
Allows active feedback for positioning
No high vacuum requirement
5.5 EARTH STRAIN MEASUREMENT
A Nanometrics Instrumentation Application
To apply short and long term monitoring of mining induced strain variations at
selected points at underground or opencut mining operations.
To use the strain measurements to predict rockmass response to mining, eg
( pit slope stability, subsidence).
The Earth Strain Measurement Group provides precision strain monitoring systems
for long term monitoring of mining induced strain variations at selected points on the
mineplan. Instruments allow continuous monitoring of tensor plane strain within the
range of 10-3 to 10-9. The technology was originally developed for earthquake strain
monitoring applications requiring extremely high sensitivity, stability and dynamic range,
but is now used in minescale monitoring environments.
This technique will be used to measure loads induced in highwall mining or in the
walls of deep open pit mining operations. Key advantages include the ability to measure
C.U.Shah College of Engg. & Tech. - 29 -
Nanocomputers
the mine scale engineering induced strain response of large structures from significant
distances, that loads induced by slow creep processes over large areas can be monitored,
that long term slow deformations can be monitored with high reliability, and that elastic
failure processes can be monitored. The operations can be performed remotely without
any disturbance to mining processes. Direct estimates of the effects of blasts on wall
loading can be measured, as can the subsequent creep and slump processes. For mining
applications strain monitoring complements microseismic monitoring which more than
adequately documents (location and amplitude) the elastic failure and stress concentration
processes.
5.6 AIRBORNE GRAVITY MEASUREMENT
Geophysical methods capable of measuring the acceleration due to the Earth's
gravitational field are amongst the earliest applications of the geophysical sciences.
Gravity surveying is one of the important techniques in modern exploration for nearly all
mineral and petroleum commodities. The significance of this method has increased in
recent times and will continue to do so in the future as major advances in satellite
positioning technology provide cost effective access to surface surveys over much larger
regions than previously possible.
The exploration industry has recently renewed interest in large scale gravity
surveys and has developed a greater appreciation of the contribution of these data sets.
The need for acquisition of large gravity data sets at high speed over highly prospective
areas is renewing demand for airborne gravity facilities capable of achieving
measurements at an accuracy suitable for detection of small and lenticular mineral
orebodies. Gravity gradiometry provides the best opportunity to achieve this accuracy and
can be performed at sampling rates necessary for targets of industry interest, on the order
of a few hundreds of metres.
This project will develop an airborne gravity gradiometer which will be capable of
providing measurements from low flying aircraft at a rate and sensitivity suitable for the
detection of buried orebodies down to a scale of approximately 300 m at burial depths of
200 m. The measurements will be integrated into other geophysical measurements from
the same or other airborne platforms to enhance exploration capability.
The project has a planned duration of five years with a budget of $15 million
dollars. The project involves high risk research with great potential impact in the industry.
The project aims at detection of geophysically significant subsurface anomalies
potentially associated with ore bodies or hydrocarbon deposits by rapid vehicle mounted
surface or airborne regional gravitational studies. The existence of gravitational
anomalies depends directly on the presence of a mass excess or deficit associated with the
deposit.
C.U.Shah College of Engg. & Tech. - 30 -
Nanocomputers
The magnitude of a typical anomaly relative to the unperturbed gravity field is
proportional to the total mass excess (or deficit), and is inversely proportional to the
square of the distance from its effective centre and the point of observation.
It is not possible in principle to distinguish between the accelerations acting on a body
due to gravitational effects from those due to kinematic effects associated with changes of
the body's velocity. Thus most gravity measurement is performed from stationary
platforms fixed to the earth surface, and its precision is limited by vibration noise sources
common in the earth. The gravitational anomaly of an ore body of density contrast 300 kg
m-3 and of dimension say 200 m buried below a depth of say 100 m of overburden is
typically 2x10-6ms-2, which is 0.00002% of the normal Earth gravity field. This relatively
small effect is normally measured in units of micro gals ( mGal ), and would represent
approximately 200 mGal.
To this time most resource significant measurements have been made using
instruments of the LaCoste/Romberg type which are essentially ultrasensitive spring
balances detecting the small difference in weight caused by the gravity anomaly. The
measurements are subject to a wide variety of environmental influences, and
measurements must be performed relative to a standard point that is used regularly during
the survey as a fixed reference for the removal of drifts in the instrument. With great care,
measurements over reasonable areas can be achieved to about 5 mGals, making this
technology appropriate for mapping regions of known potential. The procedure is slow,
and requires extensive information on local topography and geology by reason of the fact
that the normal variation of gravity with height is approximately 300 mGal per metre.
This type of relative gravity instrument has in fact been used with great difficulty from
moving platforms and in particular from aircraft where altitude control using for example
precision radar altimeters and pressure sensors to achieve vertical position to as little as
one metre still imposes limitations of the order of a few hundred mGals on the gravity
data.
For this reason emphasis for large scale geophysical prospecting has moved
towards gradiometry. In principle, measurement of the gradient of the gravity field over a
known baseline allows one to cancel out the accelerations due to the motion of the
platform itself. Gradient measurements also have some advantages in detection of
boundaries of anomalies.
The vertical component of the gradient above the orebody discussed above and
measured from an aircraft at approximately 300m is approximately 1x10-9 ms-2 per metre,
which is 1 Eotvos. Thus the Eotvos is a unit of gravity gradient, and 1 Eotvos corresponds
to 10-9 s-2. The gradient would be eight times larger at the earth's surface. For a
gradiometer, the vertical dependence of the gradient is smaller than for a gravimeter, so
that precise control of aircraft altitude is not a critical issue.
Useful gravity gradient data for exploration will require measurements below the
1 Eotvos level. This will certainly require active stabilisation of the instrument platform
for displacements at a level of about 0.01ms-2Hz-1/2 vertical, and rotations better than 10-5
rad s-1Hz-1/2. This is certainly possible on a quality stabilised platform.
C.U.Shah College of Engg. & Tech. - 31 -
Nanocomputers
Many major laboratories have been involved in gradiometer research over the last
fifteen years. One major direction of this work has been towards superconducting
gravimeters (relative and gradiometric) utilising many somewhat exotic but benign
characteristics of materials obtainable at liquid helium temperatures. The instruments are
essentially superconducting versions of the spring or differential spring gravimeters
where the mechanical springs have been replaced by magnetic field levitation. Stability is
obtained by the inherent stability of persistent currents which support the superconducting
proof mass. Commercial versions of the gravimeter with excellent long term stability (5
mGal per year) and sensitivity better than a mGal are available but cannot be used from
moving platforms.
Another direction of research has produced instruments similar to the Bell
Aerospace Rotating Gravity Gradiometer. Generically these instruments consist of
precisely matched accelerometer pairs which are rotated about an axis to produce outputs
which are modulated at harmonics of the rotation frequency by the gradient being
measured. These outputs are effectively differenced to produce a gradient. The US Air
Force GGSS (Gravity Gradiometer Survey System) used two orthogonal pairs of
accelerometers to produce two gradients. Three such systems mounted in mutually
orthogonal configuration provided six gradients, which is sufficient to fully determine the
gradient tensor. The system of three gradiometers was inertially stabilised by three
gymbals controlled by two 2-degrees-of-freedom gyroscopes and three orthogonal
accelerometers. When in use air-borne in a specially equipped C-130 transport,
navigation was performed by the autopilot using the inertial outputs of the measurement
platform. Gradients have been measured to a few tens of Eotvos units under ideal
conditions.
Initially the CSIRO system proposed will measure only the vertical gravity
gradient. The work is proceeding with eight full time staff, and the project will be
performed in four stages over four years, for completion in 2005.
C.U.Shah College of Engg. & Tech. - 32 -
Nanocomputers
6. CONCLUSION
The correct scientific answer is I don't know.
Having said that, it is worth pointing out that the trends in the development of computer
hardware have been remarkably steady for the last 50 years. Plotted on semilog paper as a
function of year, such parameters as
the number of atoms required to store one bit
the number of dopant atoms in a transistor
the energy dissipated by a single logic operation
the resolution of the finest machining technology
many others
have all declined with remarkable regularity, even as the underlying technology base has
changed dramatically. From relays to vacuum tubes to transistors to integrated circuits to
Very Large Scale Integrated circuits (VLSI) we have seen steady declines in the size and
cost of logic elements and steady increases in their performance.
If we extrapolate these trends we find they reach interesting values in the 2010 to
2020 time frame. The number of atoms required to store one bit in a mass memory device
reaches 1. The number of dopant atoms in a transistor reaches 1, (while fundamental
device physics might force us to use more than one dopant atom, it's clear that some not-
too-large integer number should suffice). The energy dissipated by a single logic
operation reaches kT for T=300 kelvins; this is roughly the energy of a single air molecule
bouncing around at room temperature. The finest machining technologies reach a
resolution of roughly an atomic diameter.
Such performance seems to require a manufacturing technology that can arrange
individual atoms in the precise structures required for molecular logic elements, connect
those logic elements in the complex patterns required for a computer, and do so
inexpensively for billions of billions of gates. In short, if we're to keep the computer
hardware revolution on schedule then it seems we'll have to develop nanotechnology in
the 2010 to 2020 time frame.
C.U.Shah College of Engg. & Tech. - 33 -
Nanocomputers
Of course, extrapolating straight lines on semilog paper is a philosophically
debatable method of technology forecasting. While we can confidently state that no
fundamental law of nature prevents us from developing nanotechnology on this schedule
(or even faster), there is equally no law of nature that says the trends of the past must
continue unchanged into the future, or that this schedule will not slip. For example, while
Babbage proposed the stored program computer in the 1830's, it was about a century
before anyone actually built one.
In 1993 the author, as co-chair of the Third Foresight Conference on Molecular
Nanotechnology, asked the assembled attendees how long they thought it would take to
develop nanotechnology, as defined here. By show of hands, answers in the range from
2010 to 2040 predominated (about two thirds of the audience).
Regardless of what extrapolation of trends or polls might suggest, we should keep
firmly in mind that how long it takes depends on what we do (or don't do). A focused
effort with resources appropriate to the magnitude of the task would speed development.
If we do little, or focus resources on short term goals, fundamental developments might
be much delayed (just as Babbage's computer was delayed by a century). To quote Alan
Kay:
"The best way to predict the future is to invent it."
C.U.Shah College of Engg. & Tech. - 34 -
Nanocomputers
7. BIBLIOGRAPHIC NOTES
7.1 REFERENCES
A true myth – NanoComputers Std. IEEE Author. James Peterson
Simple guide to Nanocomputing pub. Delhi Author Robert Wullmon
Basics of Quantum computing Std. IEEE Author George Killjt
Applied Quantum + Nano Author Rafter James
7.2 RELATED WEBSITES
How Stuff Works.com
IEEE standards.com
Nanospace.com
Google.co.in
Nanoimages.com
C.U.Shah College of Engg. & Tech. - 35 -
Nanocomputers
------------------------------------------------
C.U.Shah College of Engg. & Tech. - 36 -