Embed
Email

Loyola Law School

Document Sample
Loyola Law School
Shared by: HC111214213543
Categories
Tags
Stats
views:
0
posted:
12/14/2011
language:
pages:
3
Loyola Law School

Trial Advocacy

Spring 2006



Professor Cecil Lynn



Tuesday Afternoons

2:50 p.m.-5:50 p.m.



Syllabus and Policies

(Revised January 30, 2006)

Course Objectives

The objective of this course is to teach the fundamental trial skills necessary to conduct a

jury or a court trial. The course emphasizes students’ participation and performance in

different parts of trial proceedings. The students will learn proper courtroom etiquette

and decorum, the different stages of trial, and how to conduct themselves properly in

each of these stages.



Each student is expected to participate in pre-trial motions, preparation of a trial

notebook, selection of jury, development of themes for and delivery of opening

statement, direct examination, cross examination of witnesses, preparation for and

delivery of closing arguments.



Required Text and Materials:

Trial Techniques, Thomas A. Mauet, 6th Ed.

Materials in Trial Advocacy, Thomas A. Mauet and Warren D. Wolfson, 5th Ed.



Strongly Recommended Companion Materials:

Federal Rules of Evidence with Objections, Anthony Bochino, 6th Ed.

Evidence Handbook, Steven Goode and Olin Guy Wellborn III, 5th Ed.



Class Attendance

Since the class focuses on preparing the students for the reality of trial proceedings, class

participation and attendance are absolutely necessary. Only in a clearly necessary

situation will absences be permitted. Absenteeism will adversely impact a student’s

grade. Students are expected to be on-time and prepared to meaningfully contribute to

each class.

Examinations and Grading

The course grade will be based 45% on class participation. All students are expected to

come to class having read the assigned materials and prepared to participate, not only in

performance of their assigned problems, but also in discussion and performance of other

roles necessary for the problems (e.g., witnesses). The class participation grade will

reflect the amount and quality of each student’s preparation and participation in class.



The mock trial grade will be based 45% on the student’s degree of preparation and the

extent to which the student’s performance evidences improvement of skills that were the

subject of earlier class sessions.



The remaining 10% will be based on the completion of two written trial critiques. Each

student is required to critique trial skills observed outside the classroom environment.

While actual trial advocacy critiques are preferred (e.g., a trial, court hearing, or

administrative hearing), one critique may be based on observation of a trial scene from a

film, television episode, or a selection from Loyola’s video library. Each critique shall be

at least one single-spaced typed pages. A writing with manipulated (or large) fonts,

spacing or margins shall not meet the critique requirement.



There will be no end of term paper or final examination.



Office Hours

Professor Lynn does not have on-campus office hours. Students may contact him via

email at cecil.lynn@lls.edu. He will return emails as soon as practicable.





Tentative Schedule (subject to change)

Date Class Assignment and Participation

January Lecture on trial structure and communication skills

10 Read Chapters I, II, and XI of Trial Techniques (Mauet)

Problem 9.1



January Lecture on Trial Notebook, pretrial matters and voir dire

17 Practice Voir Dire

Read Batson v. Kentucky 476 U.S. 79 and People v. Wheeler 22 Cal.3d 258;

Read Chapters III & XII of Trial Techniques (Mauet)

Problem 1.1

January Continue practice on Voir Dire; Lecture on Opening Statements; Read

24 Chapter IV of Trial Techniques (Mauet)

Problem 9.3

January Read Chapter V and VII of Trial Techniques (Mauet)

31 Continue with Opening Statements (Problem 9.6)

Lecture on Direct Examination and Cross Examination

February Reach Chapters VI of Trial Techniques (Mauet)

7 Lecture on Exhibits/Practice Direct and Cross Examination

Problem 9.1

Direct and Cross of Karen Adams

Direct and Cross of Darlene Williams

Direct and Cross of Kelly Jackson

Direct and Cross of Kevin Flannigan

Direct and Cross of Pat Curran



February Read Chapter X of Trial Techniques (Mauet) and

14 Chapter V of Materials in Trial Advocacy Problems and Cases (Workbook)

Lecture on Objections, Impeachment and Rehabilitation

Problems in Chapter V of Workbook

Impeachment and Rehabilitation Exercises

February Continue practice of Direct Examination and Cross Examination

21 (Problem 9.6)

Direct and Cross of Eddie Felton

Direct and Cross of Fred Martin

Direct and Cross of Thomas Connor

Direct and Cross of Merle Rausch

Direct and Cross of Frank Williams

Problems 4.9, 4.10, 4.11, 4.13, 4.14, 4.16,

February Read Chapter VIII of Trial Techniques (Mauet)

28 Lecture on Witness Prep and Expert Witnesses

Problems 6.4, 6.6, and 6.9

March 7 Read Chapter IX of Trial Techniques (Mauet)

Lecture on Closing Argument

Practice Closing Arguments (9.1)

March 14 Practice Closing Arguments (9.6)

Introduction to Flinders Aluminum v. Mismo Insurance Co.

March 21 Spring Break

March 28 Flinders Aluminum v. Mismo Insurance Co. Case Analysis, Motions in

Limine, Pretrial Issues

April 4 Mock Trial

April 11 Mock Trial

April 18 Mock Trial


Related docs
Other docs by HC111214213543
ACUERDO NUMERO 346
Views: 1  |  Downloads: 0
Lecture_Mass wasting..>
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
une philo chretienne
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
PLANO DE DESENVOLVIMENTO SOCIAL
Views: 2  |  Downloads: 0
Ch. 16 Sistemas de Manufactura Flexible (FMS)
Views: 44  |  Downloads: 0
Course title
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Ramp Rates - A Suggested Strategy
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
By registering with docstoc.com you agree to our
privacy policy

You are almost ready to download!

You are almost ready to download!