A Data Picture of Our District
DEMOGRAPHIC DATA (LAST THREE YEARS)
INDICATOR 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 FACTS ABOUT
OUR DATA
TOTAL DISTRICT
STUDENT POPULATION
% FREE AND REDUCED
LUNCH(DISADVANTAGED)
% MOBILITY
% SPECIAL EDUCATION
%ENGLISH AS A SECOND
LANGUAGE (LEP)
% ETHNICITY
BLACK BLACK BLACK
HISPANIC HISPANIC HISPANIC
WHITE WHITE WHITE
ASIAN ASIAN ASIAN
OTHER OTHER OTHER
% GIFTED
% MALE
% FEMALE
STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT DATA (LAST THREE YEARS)
INDICATOR: 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 FACTS ABOUT
ISAT E M N W E M N W E M N W OUR DATA
ASSESSMENT IN 3 3 3
READING - 3-8
% Exceeds 4 4 4
%Meets 5 5 5
%Does Not Meet 6 6 6
%Academic Warning
7 7 7
8 8 8
All All All
Lowest Sub Group All All All
( )
Next lowest Sub Group
( )
ASSESSMENT IN 3 3 3
MATH - 3-8
%Exceeds 4 4 4
%Meets 5 5 5
%Does Not Meets 6 6 6
%Academic Warning
7 7 7
8 8 8
All All All
Lowest Sub Group All All All
( )
Next Lowest Sub Group
( )
STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT DATA (LAST THREE YEARS)
INDICATOR: 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 FACTS ABOUT
OTHER Median Median Median OUR DATA
ASSESSMENT Score Score Score
ASSESSMENT IN 3 3 3
READING - 3-8
Median Score 4 4 4
5 5 5
6 6 6
7 7 7
8 8 8
All All All
Lowest Sub Group All All All
( )
Next Lowest Sub Group All All All
( )
ASSESSMENT IN MATH 3 3 3
- 3-8
Median Score 4 4 4
5 5 5
6 6 6
7 7 7
8 8 8
All All All
Lowest Sub Group All All All
( )
Next Lowest Sub Group All All All
( )
STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT DATA (LAST THREE YEARS)
INDICATOR: 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 FACTS ABOUT
OTHER Median Median OUR DATA
ASSESSMENT Score Score
READING – 9-12 9 9 9
Median Score
10 10 10
11 11 11
12 12 12
All All All
Lowest Sub Group All All All
( )
Next Lowest Sub Group All All All
( )
ASSESSMENT IN 9 9 9
MATH - 9-12
Median Score 10 10 10
11 11 11
12 12 12
All All All
Lowest Sub Group All All All
( )
Next Lowest Sub Group All All All
( )
STUDENT GRADING DATA (LAST THREE YEARS)
INDICATOR: 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 FACTS ABOUT
STUDENT OUR DATA
GRADES A B C D F A B C D F A B C D F
% A.B.C.D.F IN GRADE 4
% A.B.C.D.F IN GRADE 5
% A.B.C.D.F IN GRADE 6
% A.B.C.D.F IN GRADE 7
% A.B.C.D.F IN GRADE 8
ALL GRADES 4-8
% A.B.C.D.F IN GRADE 9
% A.B.C.D.F IN GRADE 10
% A.B.C.D.F IN GRADE 11
% A.B.C.D.F IN GRADE 12
ALL GRADES 9-12
STUDENT ENGAGEMENT DATA (LAST THREE YEARS)
INDICATOR 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 FACTS ABOUT
OUR DATA
%AVERAGE DAILY
ATTENDANCE
ELEM/MIDDLE/HIGH
% STUDENTS
INVOLVED IN EXTRA-
CURRICULAR
MIDDLE/HIGH
NO. STUDENTS
ENROLLED IN
ACCELERATED MATH
MIDDLE
NO. STUDENTS
ENROLLED IN AP
COURSES
NO. OF STUDENTS
ENROLLED IN BELOW
GRADE LEVEL
COURSES
GRADUATION RATE
HIGH
STUDENT DISCIPLINE DATA (LAST THREE YEARS)
INDICATOR 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 FACTS ABOUT
OUR DATA
NO. OF REFERRALS
ELEM/MIDDLE/HIGH
NO. PARENT
CONFERENCES
REGARDING
DISCIPLINE
ELEM/MIDDLE/HIGH
NO. OF IN-SCHOOL
SUSPENSIONS
ELEM/MIDDLE/HIGH
NO. OF OUT-OF-
SCHOOL SUSPENSIONS
ELEM/MIDDLE/HIGH
NO. OF EXPULSIONS
ELEM/MIDDLE/HIGH
BUS REFFERALS FOR
DISCIPLINE
ELEM/MIDDLE/HIGH
FINANCIAL DATA (LAST THREE YEARS)
INDICATOR 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 FACTS ABOUT
OUR DATA
STATE FINANCIAL
PROFILE RATING
FUND BALANCE TO
REVENUE RATIO
EXPENDITURES TO
REVENUES RATIO
DAYS CASH ON HAND
PERCENT OF SHORT
TERM BORROWING
AVAILABLE
PERCENT OF LONG-
TERM DEBT
REMAINING
AVERAGE PER PUPIL
EXPENDITURE/ STATE
COMPARISON
AVERAGE PER PUPIL
INSTRUCTION COSTS
% BUDGET FOR
INSTRUCTION OF
STUDENTS
% BUDGET FOR
DIRECT SUPPORT TO
STUDENTS
% BUDGET FOR
CENTRAL
ADMINISTRATION
% BUDGET FOR
SALARIES AND
BENEFITS
% BUDGET FOR
PURCHASED SERVICES
% BUDGET FOR
SPECIAL EDUCATION
TUITION STUDENTS
% BUDGET FOR
SUPPLIES AND
EQUIPMENT
% REVENUE FROM
LOCAL SOURCES
% REVENUE FROM
STATE SOURCES
% REVENUE FROM
FEDERAL SOURCES
3 YEAR PROJECTION
ED FUND
3 YEAR PROJECTION
COMBINED FUNDS
BUDGET TO ACTUAL
(ED FUND)
PROJECTIONS
BUDGET TO ACTUAL
(ALL FUNDS)
PROJECTIONS
SATISFACTION SURVEY DATA (LAST THREE YEARS)
INDICATOR % RESPONDING STRONGLY AGREE OR AGREE TO FACTS ABOUT
ALL SURVEY QUESTIONS OUR DATA
2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009
STUDENT
SATISFACTION AND
PERCEPTION
% STRONGLY AGREE
OR AGREE WITH ALL
QUESTIONS
ELEM/MIDDLE/HIGH
PAST STUDENT
SATISFACTION AND
PERCEPTION
% GIVE DISTRICT AN A
OR B IN PREPARING
THEM FOR HIGH
SCHOOL
GRADE 9/POST HIGH
PARENT/FAMILY
SATISFACTION AND
PERCEPTION
% STRONGLY AGREE
OR AGREE WITH ALL
QUESTIONS
ELEM/MIDDLE/HIGH
STAFF SATISFACTION
AND PERCEPTION
% STRONGLY AGREE
OR AGREE WITH ALL
QUESTIONS
ELEM/MIDDLE/HIGH
COMMUNITY
SATISFATION AND
PERCEPTION
% STRONGLY AGREE
OR AGREE WITH ALL
QUESTIONS
HUMAN RESOURCE/OTHER DATA (LAST THREE YEARS)
INDICATOR 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 FACTS ABOUT
OUR DATA
NO. OF NATIONAL
BOARD CERTFIED
TEACHERS
ELEM/MIDDLE/HIGH
NO. OF STAFF WITH
MASTER’S OR
ADVANCED DEGREES
ELEM/MIDDLE/HIGH
SALARY AND BENEFITS
RANKING AMONG
BENCHMARK
DISTRICTS 1-5
% STAFF PRETENURED
RETENTION RATE
(EXCLUDING THOSE
NOT INVITED TO
CONTINUED
EMPLOYMENT)
% STAFF TENURED
RETENTION RATE
(EXCLUDING
RETIREMENTS)
STAFF EXIT SURVEY
% STRONGLY AGREE
OR AGREE WITH ALL
QUESTIONS
ELEM/MIDDLE/HIGH
FACILITY UTILIZATION ELM MID HIG ELE MID HIG ELM MID HIG
EXCEED/ MEET/
BELOW DESIGN
CAPACITY
CLASS SIZE AVEAGES K K K
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
4 4 4
5 5 5
6 6 6
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
11 11 11
12 12 12