Docstoc

Guerilla Warfare

Document Sample
Guerilla Warfare Powered By Docstoc
					Dustin Criswell
Professor Holliday
Guerilla Warfare
April 21, 2005


                             Guerilla Warfare
       In order to understand guerilla warfare, one must understand why a guerilla

warfare fighter takes action. If one can understand that then he/she can better understand

why and how guerilla warfare is conducted. Since rebel groups’ motivations, tactics,

strategies, and techniques vary, it is best to look at Che Guevara’s book entitled Guerilla

Warfare to see if they fall within the guidelines of guerilla warfare before being

categorized as a guerilla warfare band. One group that needs to be explored a little bit

further is the EZLN (Ejercito Zapatista de Liberación Nacional). This particular group,

which is located in Mexico, is still in effect today, and has demonstrated Che Guevara’s

concept of guerilla warfare by the use of women, the media, and by getting the support of

others; however they have also demonstrated a different type of guerilla warfare that is

inconsistent with Che Guevara’s by not taking up arms, by not using warfare strategies,

and by not using warfare techniques.

       According to Guevara, a guerilla fighter is a social reformer; he/she takes up arms

responding to the angry dissent of the people against their oppressors, and that he/she

fights in order to change the social system that keeps his/her unarmed brothers in

discomfiture and unhappiness (Guevara 4). Take for example the EZLN which was

formed by the people of Chiapas, which are mostly poor peasants, simply because they

were tired of the treatment by indigenous people and the mistreatment of the people in

general. In a statement they issued during 1993, they said they have nothing to lose.
They said they have no roofs over their heads, no land, no work, poor health, no food, no

education, no right to freely and democratically choose their leaders, etc (Para el Español

Chasque Aquí 1). How bad are they mistreated? Well, from all indications, petty bad.

For example, take a look at the inequalities of water, power, literacy, and the

development in the areas of the Chiapas. Here are some comparisons to the rest of

Mexico: Those who have running water: M=79% C=58%, Power/Electricity: M=88%,

C=67%, Literacy rates: M=87%, C=69%, Urban verses Rural living M=71% Urban,

C=40% Urban (Para el Español Chasque Aquí 1). Over the years this particular rebel

group has tried its best to achieve social reform, but in a very unique way. There main

objective is to achieve liberation through democracy. In essence, their goal is not to

cause trouble and strife, but to fight for the things people need to survive; however, they

are quite different in one aspect, they do not take up arms to defend their point of view.

       Most Guerilla warfare groups rely on a hit and run tactic. This is, they usually hit

and run, wait, lie in ambush, again hit and run, and thus repeatedly (Guevara 7). This may

seem like a form of cowardice; but, when a group has small numbers and not a lot of

resources, it is, of course, a very strategic plan. It is something that is well planned out

and never made public. They use the hit and run tactic because it is there best chance of

winning. It may not arrive at complete victory at that moment; however, it is a step

towards complete victory in the end. In order for this for this strategy to take place, a

guerilla warfare fighter needs to have good knowledge of the surrounding country side,

the path of entry and escape, the possibility of speedy movement, and good hiding places.

Above all, a fighter must know that no battle, combat, or scuffle is to be fought unless it
will be won (Guevara 6). Obviously, the EZLN does not believe in this type of warfare,

and it is quite evident when taking a look at their march to Mexico City in 2001.

       On their way to Mexico City the rebel group openly exposed themselves to an

attack. In addition, they did not impose any type of threat on anyone (EZLN Decides to

Leave Mexico City 1). Some people might think they were not successful; however, they

actually were. They were able to solidify their objectives and get spectators to join them.

Most people think force is the best way for rebel groups to operate; however, EZLN must

think differently.

       First, the EZLN really does not have to worry about the countryside or

maneuvering techniques. They simply do not believe in warfare as in the result of deaths.

They have a rebel army that seeks not war, but peace. They also claim that the use of

force is a desperate solution when faced with official deafness (Zapatist and

Psychoanalytical Ethic 2). If they were to fight in the battlefield, they would have no

chance. Guevara explains that each guerilla fighter carries his own complete equipment,

which includes a gun that can cause severe damage. The gun is referred to as an M-16

(Guevara 16). The EZLN does not use this type of warfare; instead they rely on the

media to help them.

       The EZLN likes to use the media as a weapon. Guevara explains that the

revolutionary idea should be gentle by means of appropriate media to the greatest depth

possible (Guevara 98). They are considered to be the first cyber-guerilla in the history of

mankind (Zapatist and Psychoanalytical Ethic 2). The media is a key to the group’s

survival. They make all their claims publicly in order to catch the attention of the

government. The group uses the media industry in several ways. They have used
commodified merchandise ranging from t-shirts and pens, to dolls and condoms

(International Third World Studies 1). The media, when they get paid, know who to

exactly slander/ignore. Not only do the media play an important role in the development

of the EZLN rebel group, so do the women.

       The role the women can play is of extraordinary importance (Guevara 86). Even

though the women are weaker than the man, they can, if willing, carry out the same

task—they can fight. However, most of the time woman are assigned a different task, but

which are of high importance. She can also perform her task with more freedom than the

man. For example, she can teach other soldiers how to read, she can cook, transport

messages between separated forces, she can be a nurse, a doctor, etc (Guevara 88). Even

though it is rare to see a woman fighting, it happens. Take a look at the EZLN.

       The women in this group have taken a very active role. These poor women have

little or nothing at all to arm themselves with, yet, without being hesitant, they stand up to

well armed troops with anything they have. For example, they may use rocks, sticks, and

if they do not have anything else, they will use their most powerful tool, which is their

voice. In one specific altercation, a girl by the name of Clotilde Gomez Moreles hit a

soldier in the helmet with a rock. After that, the soldier turned around and pointed his

gun at her. In stead of backing down, the girl replied by saying “Kill me then, if that’s

what you came for! We do not want you here!” After she said that, the soldier simply

lowered his gun and walked away (Para El Espanol Chasque Aquí 2). Even though the

rebel group started out as one to defend the locals, it is now a global group—fighting for

others as well.
       Every guerilla warfare band needs the support of the people in the area (Guevara

4). Not only does the EZLN have the support of the locals but others around the world as

well. They have been able to get the support of others throughout the world because of

the fight they have put up for their rights. They simply think locally but act globally.

The rallying cry they did in 1996 at the International Meeting for Humanity and Against

Neoliberalism (This is relevant to NAFTA, which is stripping away what is pure to their

culture) is an example of thinking globally, as well as showing a presence in the

mobilization against the 5th Ministerial Conference of the WTO in Cancun (EZLN 1).

One fact is, that the United States, which is supposed to be the “light house of the world”

is supporting groups that are opposed to the EZLN. NAFTA, without a doubt, should be

a “wake up call” to Americans. What the leaders say is good for the economy, is in

reality, killing millions of innocent people. With the support of others across the globe,

perhaps the rebel group will see liberation in the future.

       The EZLN group does not support all Guevara’s claims to guerilla warfare;

however, they do support some. Overall, it just depends on the rebel group and what is

best for them. One way of fighting might be good for one group and another way might

be good for another group. In the end, they all are essentially fighting for one thing, and

that is social reform. Hopefully, one day, the EZLN will see changes in Chiapas,

Mexico, and other places in the world that are oppressed—changes such as schools, good

paying jobs, a fair democratic election, better housing, food, and water—things that most

people in the world take for granted.

				
DOCUMENT INFO
Shared By:
Categories:
Tags:
Stats:
views:3
posted:12/11/2011
language:
pages:6