Gender and Development � Practical approaches

Document Sample
Gender and Development � Practical approaches Powered By Docstoc
					Gender and Development –
  Practical approaches

      - a presentation by Mona Dahms
  Department of Development and Planning
             Aalborg University
             Overview

1.    What goes wrong?
2.    Frameworks for Gender Analysis
     a) Harvard
     b) Moser
     c) Social relations




                  DIR - F03            2
      Learning Objectives
After this lecture you should be able
to:
recognise the importance of gender
 analysis for project planning,
 implementation and evaluation,
list tools for gender analysis as part of
 development interventions.



                   DIR - F03                 3
         Summary of lesson 1
   Gender is a social construction
    depending upon time and culture.
   Therefore, gender roles are neither
    universal nor unchangeable.
   There is a global gender imbalance in
    favour of men.
   It is necessary to include gender
    planning in development
    interventions
                    DIR - F03           4
1. What goes wrong?
    Gender and project planning
    Three levels of gender integration:

   Gender blindness – gender is not
    considered,
   Gender neutrality – gender is considered
    and equal opportunities are secured,
   Gender planning – gender is considered
    and equity impacts are secured.


                      DIR - F03                6
                 Equal Opportunities??
  To secure a fair
selection you all get
the same exercise:
You must climb the
        tree.




                        DIR - F03        7
              Assumptions??
(Implicit) assumptions about the household:

   The household consists of a nuclear family of
    husband, wife and 2 – 3 biological children.
   Within the household there is a clear division of
    labour based upon gender. The man is the
    breadwinner and the woman is the mother and
    housewife.
   Women’s work is unpaid housework, not crucial
    to the survival of the family



                         DIR - F03                      8
       Further assumptions??
(Implicit) assumptions about data collection:
 All techniques for data collection are equally valid
  for women and for men
 Conventional conceptual categories (ex. work)
  hold the same meaning for all people.

  Also other factors, such as: Timing of interviews,
  length of the reference period and language,
  influence data collected.




                         DIR - F03                     9
DIR - F03   10
        Exercise 1: Assumptions??

   How can we as researchers ensure
    that assumptions made are in
    accordance with the reality
    researched?

   Buzz with your nearest neighbours
    for a few minutes and present your
    thoughts to the plenary.
                   DIR - F03             11
                2. Gender Analysis
                   Frameworks




Source: UNDP Gender in Development Programme, Learning and
Information Pack; Gender Analysis
        Gender Analysis Frameworks
   Gender roles framework (Harvard)
   Triple roles framework (Carolyn Moser)
   Web of institutionalisation framework (Caren
    Levy)
   Gender analysis matrix (GAM)
   Equality and empowerment framework (Sara
    Longwe)
   Capacities and vulnerabilities framework (CVA)
   People oriented planning framework (POP)
   Social relations framework (SRF)

   The multiplicity of frameworks indicates the
    activities – but also the frustrations!
                          DIR - F03                  13
        Information provided by GA

   Specific gender disaggregated statistics
   Understanding of gender relations
   Analysis of the gendered impact of sexual
    division of labour
   Needs and interests of both women and
    men



                      DIR - F03                 14
        Harvard framework - 1

Three main tools:
1. The socio-economic activity profile –
  who does what, when, where and for
   how long?




                  DIR - F03             15
               Tool 1: Activity profile
Activities             Women/girls    Men/boys
Productive
activities
Agriculture
Income generation

Employment

Others

Reproductive
activities
Water
Fuel

Food

Childcare

Health

Cleaning and repair

Market

Other
                         DIR - F03               16
        Harvard framework - 1
Three main tools:
1. The socio-economic activity profile –
   who does what, when, where and for how
    long?
2. The access and control profile –
   who has access to resources (ex. land,
    equipment, capital etc.)?
   who has access to benefits (ex. education,
    health services, political power etc.)?
   who has control over resources and benefits?
                      DIR - F03                    17
     Tool 2: Access and control profile
                                 Access            Control
                             Women         Men   Women   Men
Resources
Land; Equipment;
Labour; Cash;
Education; Training;
Other

Benefits
Income; Ownership;
Basic needs; Education;
Political power; prestige;
Other



                               DIR - F03                       18
       Tool 3: Influencing factors


3. A list of factors which determine the
  gender differences identified –
  Charts the factors (political, economic,
   cultural etc.) which affect the gender
   differentiations identified in the profiles
  Past and present influences
  Opportunities and constraints

                     DIR - F03                   19
         Harvard framework - 2

   Strengths:

    • Collecting and organising information about
      gender division of labour,
    • Making women’s work visible
    • Distinguishes between access and control
    • Useful for projects at micro-level
    • A gender-neutral entry point for discussions
      on gender issues


                      DIR - F03                  20
         Harvard framework - 3

   Weaknesses:

    • Focus on efficiency rather than equity
    • Focus on material resources rather than on
      social relations
    • Can be carried out in a non-participatory
      way




                     DIR - F03                     21
      Exercise 2: Bumpy roads
   Use the Harvard framework to
    analyse the case study (Exercise 3 –
    Bumpy roads) handed out.
   Discuss why and how the mixed
    results were achieved.
   Please present your answers to the
    plenary.


                    DIR - F03              22
           Moser framework - 1

Two main tools used:

  1. Gender roles identification - women’s triple
     role: productive, reproductive, community.

  2. Gender needs assessment: Practical gender
     needs, strategic gender needs.




                       DIR - F03                    23
               Productive work

   Production of goods and services for
    consumption and trade (farming, fishing,
    employment, self-employment)

    Often carried out alongside the
    reproductive work. Women’s productive
    work is often less visible and less valued
    than men’s.


                       DIR - F03                 24
            Reproductive work

   Care and maintenance of the household
    and its members (bearing and caring for
    children, food preparation, water and fuel
    collection, shopping, housekeping, family
    health care)

    Seldom considered ’real work’. Usually
    unpaid.
    Almost always the responsibility of girls
    and women.
                       DIR - F03                 25
               Community work

   Collective organisation of social events
    and services (ceremonies, celebrations,
    community improvement activities,
    participation in groups and organisations,
    local political activities etc.)

    Involves volunteer time. Normally unpaid.

    Men undertake community work, too but
    often at political level, giving prestige.
                       DIR - F03                 26
Women’s Work




   DIR - F03   27
              Practical gender needs
   A response to short-term, immediately perceived
    needs arising from concrete conditions
   Mainly arising from and reinforcing particular
    women’s reproductive and productive role
   Do not challenge the subordinate position of
    women
    (Ex. Clean water, health care, housing, food provision)

    Women’s needs differ from men’s needs because of their
    different tasks and responsibilities.




                              DIR - F03                       28
              Strategic gender needs
   Response to long-term needs arising from
    women’s subordinate position
   Challenge the nature of the gendered relationship
    between women and men
   Women involved as agents of change
   Lead to a transformation of gender division of
    labour for all women
    (Ex. access to resources (land, credit, etc.), measures
    against male violence, control over own body)

    Women’s needs differ from men’s needs because of their
    different positions in society.



                              DIR - F03                       29
          Moser framework - 2
   Strengths:
    • Can be used for planning in a variety of settings
    • Challenges unequal gender relations
    • Supports the empowerment of women
    • Recognises institutional and political resistance to
      transforming gender relations
    • Needs concept useful for evaluating impact of
      development interventions
    • Triple roles concept useful for revealing women’s
      work
    • Alerts planners to the interrelationship between
      productive, reproductive and community work
                          DIR - F03                   30
             Moser framework - 3

   Weaknesses:
    • Looks at separate activities rather than
      interrelated activities of women and men
    • Other forms of inequality (race, class etc.) not
      addressed
    • Strict division between practical and strategic
      needs often unhelpful in practise
    • Moser does not include strategic needs of men
      – have been included in the Levy framework


                         DIR - F03                   31
                 Exercise 3:
               Moser framework
   Read the case study provided (case study
    one) and discuss it with your nearest
    neighbours.
   Using the Moser framework identify:
     Roles emphasised (intended and in practise),
     Gender needs met (intended and in practise),
   Fill in the accompanying chart
   Please be prepared to present your group
    results to the plenary.


                        DIR - F03                    32
    Social Relations Framework (SRF) - 1

     Five essential concepts:

     1.   Development as increasing human well-being
     2.   Social relations
     3.   Institutional analysis
     4.   Institutional gender policies
     5.   Underlying and structural causes




                          DIR - F03                33
      Concept 1: Development

   Development as increasing human
    well-being – not just economic
    growth.
   Core elements:
    • Survival
    • Security
    • Autonomy


                 DIR - F03        34
         Concept 2: Social relations

   Social relations are understood as the way
    in which different groups of people are
    positioned in relation to material and
    intangible resources.

    • SR determine people’s roles, responsibilities,
      claims, rights and control
    • SR include gender, class, ethnicity, race etc.
    • SR change overtime, influenced by changes at
      macro-level
                         DIR - F03                     35
        Concept 3: Institutional analysis
Key institution            Organisational form
State                      Legal, military, administrative
                           organisations

Market                     Firms, financial corporations,
                           farming enterprises,
                           multinationals etc.
Community                  Village tribunals, voluntary
                           associations, informal
                           networks, patron-client
                           relationship, NGOs
Family/kinship             Household, extended family,
                           lineage groups etc.

                      DIR - F03                             36
         Concept 3: Institutional analysis

    Five aspects of an institution:

    1. Rules: How are things done?
    2. Activities: What is done?
    3. Resources: What is used, what is produced?
    4. People: Who is in, who is out, who does
       what?
    5. Power: Who decides, whose interests are
       served?



                        DIR - F03                   37
Concept 4: Institutional gender policies

   Three categories of gender policies:

    • Gender- blind
    • Gender-aware
         Gender-neutral
         Gender-specific
    • Gender-redistributive


                            DIR - F03      38
DIR - F03   39
Concept 5: Underlying and structural causes


     Examines:

      • Immediate, underlying and structural
        factors responsible for problems
      • Effects on those involved




                    DIR - F03              40
             Causes and effects

Effects
Long-term effects
Intermediate effects
Immediate effects

Causes
Immediate causes - 4 levels
Intermediate causes – 4
levels
Structural causes – 4 levels
                        DIR - F03   41
    Social Relations Framework (SRF) - 2

   Strengths:

     • Used at different levels for planning and policy
       development
     • Presents a broader picture of poverty
     • Focus on structural analysis and processes of
       powerlessness and marginalisation
     • Links micro- and macro-level analysis
     • Emphasises gender relations and puts gender
       at the core of the analysis


                          DIR - F03                   42
    Social Relations Framework (SRF) - 3

   Weaknesses:

     • May give an overwhelming impression of large
       institutions
     • Overlooks the potential for people to effect
       change
     • Women may get subsumed into other social
       categories
     • Appear to be complicated


                         DIR - F03                43
           A word of caution!!
   Gender analysis should not be used as a
    rigid neutral technical tool imposed by
    outside ’experts’ !
   Women and men must be accorded an
    active decision-making role in their own
    development !
   Gender analysis can never replace
    empathy and sensitivity in development
    work!

                      DIR - F03                44
    Exercise 3: Mini-case studies
    Read the 4 mini-case studies and discuss
     the following questions:

    1. How does this project affect the workload
       and/or status of women?
    2. How, if at all, could this project be sustained?
    3. How, if at all, does this project contribute to
       the equality of women?

    Please feed back your answers to the
     plenary.
                         DIR - F03                    45
   This was all for today –
thank you for your attention
  – it has been a pleasure!

				
DOCUMENT INFO
Shared By:
Categories:
Tags:
Stats:
views:37
posted:12/10/2011
language:English
pages:46