Embed
Email

Inter-agency Policies, Collaboration & Leadership in School Mental Health

Document Sample
Inter-agency Policies, Collaboration & Leadership in School Mental Health
Shared by: Doug McCall
Categories
Tags
Stats
views:
27
posted:
12/9/2011
language:
pages:
30
Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board

Mississauga, Ontario, Canada



CASH Community of Practice on

School Mental Health Webinar

December 8, 2011









Dec. 8, 2011 © Lean & Colucci 1

Dec. 8, 2011 © Lean & Colucci 2

Education Reform

 Recommends closing the achievement gap through

◦ Improved leadership & accountability

◦ Improved pedagogy (e.g., Blankstein, 2004; Fullan, Hill &

Crevola, 2006)

 Acknowledges the existence of mental health problems in

students and the need to address them

 Suggests mental health interventions generally be carried

out by community services in or out of schools

 Where student support service professionals are employed

by a school district, they are often are not considered to be

first choice providers of mental health intervention

Dec. 8, 2011 © Lean & Colucci 3

Child/Youth Mental Health Reform

 Includes schools, but limited context, narrow focus

 Suggests community organizations have large role to

play in intervention, both in and out of schools

 Suggests teachers take on 2 additional roles

◦ Early identifiers of student mental health problems

◦ Providers of mental health promotion and prevention

(Kirby & Keon, 2006, U.S. Department of Health and

Human Services, 1999)







Dec. 8, 2011 © Lean & Colucci 4

A Commonly Utilized Approach

to Address Barriers to Learning

 Many school systems address mental health barriers to

learning through referrals and/or partnerships with

community organizations



 In the next figure, we see that this model does not

address all barriers to learning, represented by:

 Randomly placed ovals – fragmented, disjointed services

 White space in lower circle – unaddressed barriers to

learning





Dec. 8, 2011 © Lean & Colucci 5

School System Approach to Address Barriers to Learning: Referrals

Formal & Informal Partnerships with Community Organizations

Dec. 8, 2011 © Lean & Colucci 6

Limitations of Formal & Informal Partnerships

with Community Organizations

 Inherent fragmentation and duplication of service

 Different outcome measures than schools

 Schools are not their only clients

 Selective client base

 Exclusionary criteria

 Catchment areas

 Can be project based and time-limited

 “What program can I fit this client into?”

 Do not always utilize population-based approach

Dec. 8, 2011 © Lean & Colucci 7

System Approach to Address Barriers to Learning:

School-based Student Support Services Teams and

Community Organizations

 Utilized by many school systems in large urban areas

 School-based board-employed support services are

represented in the large oval in the lower circle

 Fragmentation of interventions shown by small ovals

scattered and haphazardly distributed in bottom circle

 Community organizations not sufficiently integrated

with school-based support services

 This represents that not all barriers to learning are

addressed, despite formal and informal partnerships

with community organizations and school support

services

Dec. 8, 2011 © Lean & Colucci 8

System Approach to Address Barriers to Learning: School-based

Student Support Services Teams and Community Organizations









Dec. 8, 2011 © Lean & Colucci 9

SBMH Issues

 Although research clearly states the advantages of

using school-based student support services

professionals to provide SBMH services (Crisp et al.,

2006; Massey et al., 2005), this is not a common

practice

 Education system mandating multi-disciplinary

school-based student support services is not universal

 Although these professionals are trained and capable

of addressing mental health issues in students, their

role is often limited to providing interventions to

special education students and/or crisis intervention



Dec. 8, 2011 © Lean & Colucci 10

SBMH Issues



 School-based support service effectiveness measured

by clearing all referrals – “head counts”

 One student/small group/deficit-based intensive

service delivery

 Few prevention programs

 Insufficient parental involvement

 Lack of a sound structure to jointly plan and facilitate

interventions



Dec. 8, 2011 © Lean & Colucci 11

Addressing the Issues in SBMH

 Barriers to Learning makes a case for integrating

mental health services in schools and provides a

practice-based evidence model for achieving this goal

 Barriers to Learning also supports the implementation

of a population-based approach to addressing the

mental health of all students









Dec. 8, 2011 © Lean & Colucci 12

Dec. 8, 2011 © Lean & Colucci 13

SISSM

 In the School-based Integrated Support Services

Model (SISSM) framework, school-based support

services professionals (e.g, psychology, social work)

play a coordinating role integrating additional mental

health professionals and others from community

organizations

 School-based student support services professionals

can be instrumental in providing a seamless delivery of

services to ensure the best outcome for all children and

youth facing mental health and academic issues



Dec. 8, 2011 © Lean & Colucci 14

SISSM

 CORE GROUP of school-based (preferably district-

employed) support services professionals assigned to

each school

 CORE GROUP facilitates integration and

collaboration of school-based support services

professionals and school-linked community

organizations to provide mental health services in

schools

 This avoids fragmentation of services & duplication of

interventions

Dec. 8, 2011 © Lean & Colucci 15

Proposed School System Approach to Address Barriers to Learning: The

School-based Integrated Support Services Model (SISSM) (Lean & Colucci ©)









Dec. 8, 2011 © Lean & Colucci 16

SISSM Process

 Establish Local Area Service Collaboration Group

(identify & recruit leadership and membership)

 Map existing local resources and services

 Determine school(s) needs (3 tiers)

 Establish broad and specific focus/goals/outcome

measures

 Reallocate/redeploy community-based services to

address school needs in collaboration with school-

based services

 Evaluate program(s)



Dec. 8, 2011 © Lean & Colucci 17

SISSM Flow Chart







Dec. 8, 2011 © Lean & Colucci 18

Dec. 8, 2011 © Lean & Colucci 19

Dec. 8, 2011 © Lean & Colucci 20

Re-allocation and re-deployment of

community-based professionals into schools



• Reduces fragmentation and duplication of services

• Integration of outcome measures (academic and

mental health)

• No exclusionary criteria, catchment areas and selective

client bases

• Interventions based on school-identified needs

• Able to span continuum of services (universal,

targeted, intense)

• Less stigma and easier access for students and parents



Dec. 8, 2011 © Lean & Colucci 21

School-based Support Services

Intervention and Roles: SBMH

Dec. 8, 2011 © Lean & Colucci 22

Flexibility of SISSM

 SISSM was developed to function in any jurisdiction and

within any structure and funding model

 School-based district-employed support services personnel

within SISSM are part of school’s culture enabling them to

 integrate community professionals into schools

 coordinate interventions within a population-based approach

 For school districts that do not employ mental health

professionals, SISSM offers a framework whereby

community professionals with training in school-based

services, including school culture and climate, can

successfully practice in the school system

Dec. 8, 2011 © Lean & Colucci 23

Funding Models for SBMH

 SBMH funding

 Totally government funded

 School-based District-employed (e.g, through education funding)

 School-linked other government department employed (through

health or mental health funding)

 Insurance-based funding

 Private insurance (e.g., HMO’s)



 Government needs-based funding (e.g., Medicaid)



 Government, university, NGO and private grants

 Combination of any of the above

 SISSM would be most successful with sustained funding



Dec. 8, 2011 © Lean & Colucci 24

Dec. 8, 2011 © Lean & Colucci 25

In the Works – Book 2

 Broad and Specific School Board Mental Health

Strategy Planners

 Tool for Developing Intervention Menus for School-

based Mental Health Supports

 Training Syllabus for School-based Support Services in

SISSM Framework

 Training Syllabus for School-linked Professionals in

SISSM Framework

 Needs Assessment Tool

 Mapping Local Resources Tool



Dec. 8, 2011 © Lean & Colucci 26

DRAFT Mapping Local Resources Tool

Organization Disciplines/ Programs Tiers

Titles

School Board ---------- Psychology, Social CBT for Anxiety 3

Work

Community Local Hospital Psychologist on Section 23 Class 3

Mental Health Eating Disorder for Inpatients

Team



Social Services Child Social Workers Prevention 1

Protection Activity

Health & Child Mental Psychology, Social Parenting Aggressive 2

Children Group

Allied Health Health Clinic Work, CYW

Youth Justice NPU, Probation & Youth Anti-bullying class 3

presentations

Probation Officers

Community Recreation Youth Leaders Basketball 2

Organizations Centre

Universities & Local Psychology, SW, Intervention for 3

Colleges University & CYW, SLP students: aggressive

College research & interns students

Dec. 8, 2011 © Lean & Colucci 27

References

 Crisp, H.L., Gudmundsen, G.R., & Shirk, S.R. (2006).

Transporting evidence-based therapy for adolescent

depression to the school setting. Education and

Treatment of Children, 29(2), 287-309.

 Kirby, M.J.L., & Keon, W.J. (2006). Out of the Shadows

at Last: Transforming Mental Health, Mental Illness

and Addiction Services in Canada. Ottawa, Senate of

Canada Standing Senate Committee on Social Affairs,

Science and Technology.





Dec. 8, 2011 © Lean & Colucci 28

References

 Massey, O.T., Armstrong, K., Boroughs, M., Henson, K., &

McCash, L. (2005). Mental health services in schools: A

qualitative analysis of challenges to implementation,

operation and sustainability. Psychology in the Schools.

(42(4), 361-372.

 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (1999)

Mental Health: A Report of the Surgeon General. Rockville,

MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services,

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services

Administration, Center for Mental Health Services,

National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Mental

Health.



Dec. 8, 2011 © Lean & Colucci 29

Dec. 8, 2011 © Lean & Colucci 30


Related docs
Other docs by Doug McCall
Aldinger Webinar RAAP Capaciy Assessment
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Hoyle Building Capacity in SH Promotion
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
State Self-Assessment in MH Leadership
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
US State Resources for Leadership in MH
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
State Leadership in MH: Ten Critical Factors
Views: 8  |  Downloads: 0
SH Insider Report Dec 2011
Views: 12  |  Downloads: 0
SH Insider Report Nov 2011
Views: 4  |  Downloads: 0
SH Insider Report Nov 2011
Views: 3  |  Downloads: 0
SH Insider Report Sep 2011
Views: 8  |  Downloads: 1