Embed
Email

CPM 2011/INF/15

Document Sample
CPM 2011/INF/15
Shared by: HC111208013634
Categories
Tags
Stats
views:
0
posted:
12/7/2011
language:
pages:
18
CPM 2011/INF/15

March 2011

E







COMMISSION ON PHYTOSANITARY MEASURES



Sixth Session



Rome, 14-18 March 2011



Compiled Member Comments on Draft Revision of ISPM 7:1997

Phytosanitary Certification System (CPM2011/03/Attachment 1)



Agenda Item 9.2.1 of the Provisional Agenda







The Secretariat compiled a total of 55 comments received in advance of CPM-6 on the Revision of

ISPM 7:1997 Phytosanitary Certification System, from the following members:





 Argentina

 Australia

 Brazil

 Canada

 Chile

 COSAVE

 EPPO

 EU and its 27 Member States

 Japan

 Kenya

 Norway

 Russia

 South Africa

 Uruguay

 United States of America









This document is printed in limited numbers to minimize the environmental impact of FAO's processes and contribute to climate

neutrality. Delegates and observers are kindly requested to bring their copies to meetings and to avoid asking for additional copies.

Most FAO meeting documents are available on the Internet at www.fao.org



W0000

2 CPM 2011/INF/15









Compiled comments prior to CPM-6 on document CPM/2011/3/Attachment 1





DRAFT REVISION OF ISPM 7:1997





PHYTOSANITARY CERTIFICATION SYSTEM





Comments received 14 days prior to CPM-6 (28 Feb. 2011)





The following are comments received according to guidelines given in the document CPM 2011/03. The Secretariat has compiled the comments, as provided

by members, in the order of the text with editorial and translation comments, if any, at the end of the list. This document is provided for information.





1. Section 2. 3. 4. Type of 5. Proposed rewording 6. Explanation 7. Country

Para. Sentence comment

No. /row/inde

nt, etc.

1.

Outline of [11] Sustantive Contracting parties shall should make To be consistent with Article ARGENTINA, Brazil,

requirements arrangements for the issuance of V of the text of IPPC CHILE, COSAVE,

phytosanitary certificates. These URUGUAY

phytosanitary certificates are issued for

exported or re-exported consignments to

provide assurance to an NPPO that the

consignments meet its phytosanitary import

requirements.

CPM 2011/INF/15 3









1. Section 2. 3. 4. Type of 5. Proposed rewording 6. Explanation 7. Country

Para. Sentence comment

No. /row/inde

nt, etc.

2.

Outline of [12] Sentence 2 Substantive The NPPO undertakes the operational It‟s not just about “setting up” AUSTRALIA

requirements responsibilities, including the sampling and the systems, it‟s also about

inspection of plants, the detection and maintaining them.

identification of pests, the surveillance of

crops, the performance of treatments, and

establishing and maintaining setting up a

record-keeping system.

3.

Outline of [15] Last Technical ...import requirements or and non- These are not alternatives EPPO, NORWAY, EU and

requirements sentence compliances.. its 27 Member States

(hereinafter referred to as

'EU'), RUSSIA

4 CPM 2011/INF/15









1. Section 2. 3. 4. Type of 5. Proposed rewording 6. Explanation 7. Country

Para. Sentence comment

No. /row/inde

nt, etc.

4. Article V.1 of IPPC Convention provides:

REQUIREMENTS [17] paragraph substantial New changes make the Kenya

Each contracting party shall make paragrapgh clear

arrangements for phytosanitary certification,

with the objective of ensuring that exported

plants, plant products and other regulated

articles and consignments thereof are in

conformity with the certifying statement

“This to certify that the plants, plant products

or other regulated articles described herein

have been inspected and/or tested according

to appropriate official procedures and are

considered to be free from the quarantine

pests specified by the importing contracting

party and to conform with the current

phytosanitary requirements of the importing

contracting party, including those for

regulated non-quarantine pests. They are

deemed to be practically free from other

pests”









5.

REQUIREMENTS [18] Sustantive Therefore, contracting parties shall should To be consistent with Article ARGENTINA, Brazil,

develop and maintain a phytosanitary V of the text of IPPC CHILE, COSAVE,

certification system for certifying compliance URUGUAY

of plants, plant products and other regulated

articles with the phytosanitary import

requirements regulations of importing

CPM 2011/INF/15 5









1. Section 2. 3. 4. Type of 5. Proposed rewording 6. Explanation 7. Country

Para. Sentence comment

No. /row/inde

nt, etc.

contracting parties as well as their freedom

For consistence throughout

from regulated pests. The system for the

the text.

issuance of phytosanitary certificates includes

the components of authority, responsibilities,

resources, documentation, communication

and review.

6.

REQUIREMENTS [18] First Technical ..and other regulated articles with the Consistent with wording of EPPO, NORWAY, EU,

sentence phytosanitary regulations import para 11 and statement on the RUSSIA

requirements of importing contracting certificates.

parties...

7.

1. Legal Authority [20] Substantive The NPPO shall should have the sole To be consistent with the text ARGENTINA. Brazil,

authority by legislative or administrative of IPPC. CHILE, COSAVE,

means to conduct, develop and maintain a URUGUAY

phytosanitary certification system related to

exports and re-exports, and shall should bear

the legal responsibility for its actions in using

this authority, in accordance with Article

IV.2(a) of the IPPC.

8.

1. Legal Authority [21] Sentence Substantive The NPPO may should have the Consistent with the intent of Australia

responsibility to prevent the export of the Convention

consignments….

9.

2.2 Operational [27] 1st Substantive The NPPO should have the capability to Article V 2 (a) of the AUSTRALIA

responsibilities sentence undertake, or systems in place to allow for convention allows for the

authorised personnel to conduct some NPPO to authorise personal

tasks on their behalf, the following to perform some tasks on

functions: their behalf.

6 CPM 2011/INF/15









1. Section 2. 3. 4. Type of 5. Proposed rewording 6. Explanation 7. Country

Para. Sentence comment

No. /row/inde

nt, etc.

10. - perform, supervise or audit the required

2.2 Operational [27] Fifth dot Substantive Treatrments may be Australia

phytosanitary treatments

responsibilities point performed by organisations or

personnel other than the

NPPO. These are not always

directly supervised, but may

be undertaken through

arrangements approved by the

NPPO and subject to regular

audit.

11. The NPPO should have the capability to

2.2 Operational [27] ARGENTINA, Brazil,

undertake the following functions:

responsibilities CHILE, COSAVE

- document and maintain the

information regarding the

phytosanitary import requirements

where needed for phytosanitary

certification and provide relevant

information in instructions to

personnel

- perform sampling, inspection and

testing of plants, plant products and

other regulated articles for purposes

related to phytosanitary certification

- detect and identify pests

- identify plants, plant products and

other regulated articles

- perform or supervise the required

phytosanitary treatments

- perform surveys and monitoring and

control activities to confirm the

CPM 2011/INF/15 7









1. Section 2. 3. 4. Type of 5. Proposed rewording 6. Explanation 7. Country

Para. Sentence comment

No. /row/inde

nt, etc.

phytosanitary status attested in

phytosanitary certificates

- complete and issue phytosanitary

certificates

- verify that appropriate phytosanitary

procedures have been established and

correctly applied

- investigate and take corrective actions

(if appropriate) on any notification of

non-compliance

- produce operational instructions to

ensure that phytosanitary import

requirements are met satisfied

- archive copies of issued phytosanitary

certificates and other relevant

documents

- review the effectiveness of

phytosanitary certification systems

- implement, to the extent possible,

safeguards against potential problems

such as conflicts of interest and

fraudulent issuance and use of

phytosanitary certificates

- conduct training for personnel

To clarify

- verify the competency of authorized

personnel

- ensure through appropriate procedures

the phytosanitary security of

consignments after phytosanitary

8 CPM 2011/INF/15









1. Section 2. 3. 4. Type of 5. Proposed rewording 6. Explanation 7. Country

Para. Sentence comment

No. /row/inde

nt, etc.

certification, prior to export.



Editorial









To clarify









Editorial









To be consistent with Article

IV.2(g) of the text of IPPC.







Substantive

12.

2.2 Operational [27] 16th Technical

- ensure through appropriate procedures

Addition in conformity with EPPO, NORWAY, EU,

the phytosanitary security of

responsibilities indent Article IV 2(g) of the IPPC. RUSSIA

consignments after certification prior

to export.

CPM 2011/INF/15 9









1. Section 2. 3. 4. Type of 5. Proposed rewording 6. Explanation 7. Country

Para. Sentence comment

No. /row/inde

nt, etc.

13. - ensure through appropriate procedures To be consistent with Article

[27] 16º Indent Substantive URUGUAY

the phytosanitary security of IV.2(g) of the text of

consignments after phytosanitary IPPC.

certification, prior to export.







14.

3.1 Personnel [32] Last substantive To ensure independence in their exercise of 3rd parties have a financial Australia

sentence official functions, they should be subject to interest in any inspection they

restrictions and obligations equivalent to carry out as they arepaid for

those for government officials and have no these inspection. Use of

financial interest in the outcome conflict of „conflict of interest‟ (a

interest, financial or otherwise, that may situation in which someone‟s

affect the in the outcome. private interests could

conflict with their

obligations) overcomes this

and aligns the concept and

working with that for

government officials given in

para 31.

15.

3.1 Personnel [32] Last Substantive To ensure independence in their exercise of This is a new concept. Canada

sentence official functions, they should be subject to Canada does not agree with

restrictions and obligations equivalent to its addition and requests it be

those for government officials and have no deleted.

financial or any other personal interest in the

outcome.

It could be difficult to assess

the „personal interest‟ of non-

government officials in the

outcome. The evaluation of

their personal interest in the

10 CPM 2011/INF/15









1. Section 2. 3. 4. Type of 5. Proposed rewording 6. Explanation 7. Country

Para. Sentence comment

No. /row/inde

nt, etc.

outcome would be very

subjective and hard to prove

in some instances.





Canada strongly believes that

the risk of personal interest is

mitigated by a strong

oversight by the NPPO,

including a thorough audit

component.

16.

3.1 Personnel [32] 3rd Substantive To ensure independence in their exercise of This last obligation goes over USA

sentence their official functions, they should be and above the Convention.

and editorial

subject to restrictions and obligations Current certification practices

equivalent to those for government officials. may use the industry in the

and have no financial or any other personal process. NPPOs would train

interest in the outcome. personnel, oversee their work,

audit the work, and take full

responsibility for the

phytosanitary certification.

Nevertheless, it would be

rather difficult to agree with

this last statement. Suggest

deletion.

17.

3.2 Information on [34] Substantive Phytosanitary certification should be based ARGENTINA, Brazil,

phytosanitary import on official information from the importing CHILE, COSAVE

requirements country. The NPPO of the exporting country

should, to the extent possible, have available

official current information concerning the

phytosanitary import requirements of relevant

CPM 2011/INF/15 11









1. Section 2. 3. 4. Type of 5. Proposed rewording 6. Explanation 7. Country

Para. Sentence comment

No. /row/inde

nt, etc.

importing countries. Such information shall

should be made available in accordance with

Article VII.2(b), VII.2(d) and VII.2(i) of the

Convention and ISPM 20:2004, section

5.1.9.2.

To consistence with Articles

mentioned in this para.

18.

3.2 Information on [34] Substantive Phytosanitary certification should be based To be consistent with IPPC URUGUAY

phytosanitary import on official information from the importing Articles mentioned in this

requirements country. The NPPO of the exporting country paragraph.

should, to the extent possible, have available

official current information concerning the

phytosanitary import requirements of relevant

importing countries. Such information shall

should be made available in accordance with

Article VII.2(b), VII.2(d) and VII.2(i) of the

Convention and ISPM 20:2004, section

5.1.9.2.

[2] 19. 4.2 Documentation of

[44] Indent 1 Editorial - specific activities…..including inspection, Describe phytosanitary EU

procedures

sampling, inspection, testing, treatment and procedures in right order.

Technical

verifying the identity and integrity of

Unclear what is meant by

consignments

“verifying consignments”.

The proposed wording is an

attempt to clarify according

to our understanding, and to

keep compliance with

Section 2.2 of ISPM 23.

20.

4.2 Documentation of [45] Whole Technical In addition NPPOs may have documented Clarification concerning EPPO, NORWAY, EU,

procedures sentence procedures in place related to phytosanitary cooperation with stakeholders RUSSIA

12 CPM 2011/INF/15









1. Section 2. 3. 4. Type of 5. Proposed rewording 6. Explanation 7. Country

Para. Sentence comment

No. /row/inde

nt, etc.

certification for the cooperation with

stakeholders (i.e. producers, brokers, traders).

21. Copies of phytosanitary certificates should

4.3 Record-keeping [47] 2nd Technical Add text to be in line with EPPO, NORWAY, EU,

also be kept by the NPPO for the purposes of

sentence para 49, copies of PC should RUSSIA,

validation and trace-back for an appropriate

be kept by the NPPO

period of time (at least one year).







22.

4.3 Record-keeping [49] 1st Technical Records should be kept for an appropriate We note that the Standards AUSTRALIA

sentence period of time (at least one year) and the Committee will discuss the

NPPO should be able to retrieve these issue of the length of time

records. that records must be kept as

contained in ISPMs. There

should be some consistency

between the length of time

with adopted ISPMs have

record keeping periods

suggested between 1 and 3

years.

23.

5.2 Communication [55] Substantive NPPOs shall should, in accordance with their To be consistent with the text ARGENTINA, Brazil,

between NPPOs obligations in the Convention, designate an of IPPC. CHILE, COSAVE,

IPPC contact point (IPPC, Article VIII.2). URUGUAY

Official communications should be sent to

that contact point. However, for specific

information or activities (e.g. notification of

non-compliance) an NPPO may designate

alternative points for contact on such matters.

24.

5.2 Communication [55] Sentence 2 Substantive Official communications should be sent to To indicate a two-way South Africa

between NPPOs that contact point communication flow through

CPM 2011/INF/15 13









1. Section 2. 3. 4. Type of 5. Proposed rewording 6. Explanation 7. Country

Para. Sentence comment

No. /row/inde

nt, etc.

the NPPO Contact Point.

Official communications should be sent to

and from that contact point.



EDITORIAL COMMENTS



25.

GENERAL Througho Editorial Convention IPPC Throughout the text the EPPO, NORWAY,

COMMENTS ut the text Convention is referred to as

EU and its 27 Member States

“the IPPC” - see para [7],

(hereinafter referred to as

[17], [20], [42], [55] and [56].

'EU') RUSSIA

Please check in the all

document for consistency for

example [34], [42], [55]

26.

Scope [6] Last row Editorial Requirements and guidelines for the The reference to ISPM 12 EPPO, NORWAY, EU,

preparation and issuance of phytosanitary may require a later RUSSIA

certificates1 (phytosanitary certificates for amendment.

export and phytosanitary certificates for re-

export) are described in ISPM 12:

2001[amend as appropriate to

ISPM 12:201-].





27.

Scope [6] footnote editorial The IPPC refers to two models: a For consistent wording with JAPAN

“phytosanitary certificate” for export the draft revision of ISPM

purpose and a “phytosanitary certificate for No.12

re-export” for re-export purposes.

28.

Outline of [11] 2nd Editorial These phytosanitary certificates are issued Use of the word “its” seems EPPO, NORWAY, RUSSIA

requirements sentence for exported or re-exported consignments to inappropriate since it is not

provide assurance to an NPPO that the the importing requirements of

14 CPM 2011/INF/15









consignments meet its the phytosanitary the NPPO but of the

import requirements. contracting party.





29.

Outline of [12] Sentence editorial The NPPO undertakes or approves the “The NPPO undertakes the Australia

requirements 2 operational responsibilities arrangements operational responsibilities

to implement these requirements, …” does not allow for other

including… accredited organisations or

personnel to perform the

listed activities in the

remainder of the sentence and

is inconsistent with other

elements of the Standard,

especially paragraph 13.

30.

Outline of [12] 2nd Editorial The NPPO undertakes the operational The responsibilities are EPPO, NORWAY, EU,

requirements sentence responsibilities, including the sampling and referred to very generally, so RUSSIA

inspection of plants, the detection and definite articles don‟t seem to

identification of pests, the surveillance of be proper.

crops, the performance of treatments, and

setting up a record-keeping system.





31.

Outline of [12] 2nd editorial The NPPO undertakes the operational For consistency. Same USA

requirements sentence, responsibilities, including the sampling and wording used in the

4th row inspection of plants, plant products, and Convention and rest of the

other regulated articles, the detection and standard.

identification of pests, the surveillance of

crops, the performance of treatments, and

setting up a record-keeping system.





32.

Outline of [13] Sentence Editorial Authorized non-government personnel, More precise. Consistency EPPO, NORWAY, RUSSIA

requirements 2 when qualified and skilled and responsible with the wording used in para.

to the NPPO, may carry out specific No. [32].

CPM 2011/INF/15 15









specified certification functions.

33.

Outline of [13] Sentence Editorial Authorized non-government personnel, Better English. EU

requirements 2 when qualified and skilled and responsible

to the NPPO, may carry out specific

specified certification functions., provided More precise. Consistency

they are qualified and skilled and with the wording used in para

responsible to the NPPO. [32].

34.

Outline of [13] 1st editorial In undertaking these functions, the NPPO of USA

requirements sentence, the exporting country should have personnel

2nd row with the required skills and technical

qualifications.

35.

REQUIREMENTS [18] Last editorial The system for the issuance of phytosanitary Wording consistent with the USA

sentence certificates includes the componentes of rest of the text.

legal authority, administrative and

operational responsibilities, resources and

infrastructure, documentation,

communication and system review.

36. - document and maintain the information

2.2 Operational [27] 1st dash editorial Section 4.2 of the draft refers Australia

regarding the phytosanitary import

responsibilities point to work instructions –

requirements where needed for

consistency of terms here

phytosanitary certification and provide

appropriate work instructions relevant

information in instructions to personnel

37. - implement, to the extent possible,

2.2 Operational [27] 13th Editorial Term used everywhere else in Australia

safeguards against potential problems such

responsibilities indent this section may as well stay

as conflicts of interest and fraudulent

consistent.

issuance and use of phytosanitary

certificates





38.

2.2 Operational [27] 2nd Editorial . ..including inspection, sampling, describe phytosanitary EPPO, NORWAY, EU,

responsibilities indent inspection…. procedures in right order RUSSIA

16 CPM 2011/INF/15









39.

2.2 Operational [27] 13th editorial implement, to the extent possible, For consistent wording JAPAN

responsibilities indent safeguards against potential problems such

as conflicts of interest and fraudulent

issuance and use of phytosanitary

certificates

40.

2.2 Operational [27] 10º Editorial

- produce operational instructions to

To clarify URUGUAY

ensure that phytosanitary import

responsibilities Indent

requirements are met satisfied



41.

2.2 Operational [27] 13º Editorial

- implement, to the extent possible,

To clarify URUGUAY

safeguards against potential problems such

responsibilities Indent

as conflicts of interest and fraudulent

issuance and use of phytosanitary

certificates







42. - Perform or supervise the required

2.2 Operational [27] 5th indent Editorial USA

phytosanitary treatments

responsibilities



- Perform surveys, and monitoring

and control activities to confirm the

6th indent Editorial phytosanitary status attested in

phytosanitary certificates



- Implement, to the extent posible,

safeguards against potential problems such

as conflicts fo interest and fraudulent

13 indent editorial issuance and use of phytosanitary Not necessary

certificates

43. remove the brackets around this sentence

3.1 Personnel [31] Last Editorial RUSSIA

sentence

CPM 2011/INF/15 17









44.

3.1 Personnel [32] 1st Editorial

- Except for the issuance of

consistency AUSTRALIA

phytosanitary certificates non-

sentence

governmental personnel may be authorized

by the NPPO to perform carry out

specified certification functions.



45.

3.2 Information on [34] 1st Editorials

- Phytosanitary certification should be

2 edits: Remove space at AUSTRALIA

based on official information from the

phytosanitary import sentence beginning of paragraph ie

importing country. The NPPO of the

requirements align text

exporting country should, to the extent

possible, have available current official

current information concerning the

move “current”.

phytosanitary import requirements of

relevant importing countries.



46. - the biology, surveillance, detection and

3.3 Technical [36] Indent 2 Editorial More precise as it is EPPO, NORWAY, RUSSIA

identification of these pests

information on concerning “regulated pests”

regulated pests and not all pests.

47. - the means to control such pests, including

3.3 Technical [36] 3rd indent editorial USA

treatment where appropriate

information on

regulated pests

48. The system should allow the traceability of

4. Documentation [40] Sentence Editorial As “phytosanitary EPPO, NORWAY, EU,

phytosanitary certificates and the related

2 certificates” is a plural, the RUSSIA

consignments and its their parts.

“related consignements”

should be a plural.

49. The NPPO should have a system for

4. Documentation [40] 1st editorial USA

documenting the relevant procedures

sentence,

applied, and maintain records kept

1st row

(including documentation storage and

retrieval).



50. ..including inspection, sampling,

4.2 Documentation of [44] Indent 1 Editorial Describe phytosanitary EPPO, NORWAY, RUSSIA

inspection….

procedures procedures in right order

18 CPM 2011/INF/15









51. - Specific activities relating to phytosanitary

4.2 Documentation of [44] 1st indent editorial USA

certificates, as described in ISPM 12:2001,

procedures

including sampling, inspection, testing,

treatment and verifying verification of

consignments

52.

4.3 Record-keeping [47] 2nd editorial Copies of phytosanitary certificates should USA

sentence also be kept for the purposes of validation

and traceability -back

53.

4.3 Record-keeping [49] paragraph editorial Records should be kept for an appropriate Paragragh more clear with Kenya

period of time (at least one year) and the revisión suggested

NPPO should be able to retrieve these

records. The use of secure electronic

storage and retrieval system is

recommended for standardized

documentation of records.

54.

5.2 Communication [57] 1st row editorial Where necessary, the NPPO of the exporting USA

between NPPOs country should liaise communicate with

the IPPC contact point of the importing

country to clarify and confirm the

phytosanitary import requirements.



55. 5.2 Communication [58] Editorial If after phytosanitary certification the NPPO To clarify ARGENTINA, Brazil,

between NPPOs of the exporting country becomes aware CHILE, COSAVE,

that an exported consignment may not have URUGUAY

complied with phytosanitary import

requirements, the IPPC contact point or

designated alternative point of contact in

the importing country should be informed

as soon as possible. In cases where non-

compliance has been identified at import,

ISPM 13:2001 applies.


Related docs
Other docs by HC111208013634
Assurance
Views: 1  |  Downloads: 0
lap_thn_2006-edit_jan-dis_
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
COGNOME E NOME
Views: 1  |  Downloads: 0
CURR MTH
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
By registering with docstoc.com you agree to our
privacy policy

You are almost ready to download!

You are almost ready to download!