Embed
Email

Mozart Requiem

Document Sample
Mozart Requiem
Shared by: HC111208005119
Categories
Tags
Stats
views:
1
posted:
12/7/2011
language:
pages:
14
Mozart Requiem







Mozart’s last composition, Requiem Mass in D minor (K626), was unfinished at



the time of his death in 1791. The composer had finished the majority of the vocal parts,



sketched accompaniment ideas throughout, and made note, whether by word of mouth or



notation in the score, of his ideas about the finish of the piece. Regardless of exact extent



to which Mozart completed the mass or who finished which sections and for what reason,



the Requiem stands as an example of Mozart’s ability to synthesize the stile antico



traditions popular in Austrian sacred music of his time with fresh compositional ideas in



the grand mass style.



Stile antico, sometimes called the Palestrina style, emphasizes modal tendencies,



formal structure, strict counterpoint, and the importance of vocal music over



instrumental. The Requiem is set in D minor giving it a modal feel. These specific D



minor sections of the mass provide a larger framework for the piece. The mass follows



the normal compositional practices of Salzburg and Vienna at the time. The voices



always remain central to the piece and a fugue ends each of the five major sections.



Mozart saw fit to complete his choral parts for the Requiem first. They are



therefore its foundation. The choral writing is compact and the melody is usually



assigned to the top voice. There are no purely solo vocal movements in the mass, and



virtuosity is not demanded of the singers though the choral parts are at times technically



difficult. When solo sections occur, they are followed with choral ripieno standard to the



period. Mozart uses cantabile, imitative, homophonic, and fugual choral textures that



could be easily categorized as Handelian.

The Requiem also contains examples of the new style of music that Mozart and



his contemporaries creating. He combines huge stile antico contrapuntal statements with



sections of music that emphasize the text and its drama. Mozart frequently alternates the



choral textures of the mass, giving more variety than in the old style. The setting of the



Sequence is more like the larger masses of the period including his own C Minor Mass.



Each section of the Sequence has its own distinctive character, and textural variations are



even used on a smaller scale within each movement. The text itself is never overlapped



as in the missa brevis style favored by Archbishop Collarado, and the soprano solos have



a cantablile aria feel.



Orchestral innovations are also taking place. While keeping traditional structural



elements like the fugue, new orchestral colorings, added rhythmic interest in the



instruments, and a variety of accompaniment patterns emerge. For example, the



instrumentation of the Introit uses traditional colla parte writing, but within the same



Introit, the strings are used for obligato purposes. In keeping with the traditional



emphasis on the vocal parts, the “Dies irae,” “Confutatis,” and “Domine Jesu” have no



instrumental introductions, but the orchestration in these same sections comes close to



equaling the intensity of the text.



Key relationships in the Requiem tend to be by the third (mediant and



submediant) rather than by the fifth as in the old style. For example, the “Rex



tremendae” starting in G minor but quickly moving to D minor is framed by the “Tuba



mirum” in B flat major (down a third) and the “Recordare” in F major (up a third).



Throughout, the mass has rich and sometimes unexpected modulations.

Mozart’s operatic background allows him to master the text of the Requiem. The



key of D minor, recognized for pathos and its modal interest, is used to set the death



mass. The composer shows his interest in the text’s drama by using material from a



funeral anthem by Handel at the outset of the piece. With the exception of the “Sanctus,”



written by Sussmayr, Mozart sets the dark text of the mass using flat-sided keys, even



avoiding the dominant A major. The density of modulations within the Requiem adds



tension and increase the dramatic of the text. The dark timbre of the basset horns is used



rather than setting the piece with brighter flutes and clarinets. His orchestration also uses



the weightiness of the trombones to set texts dealing with glory as well as terror.



The use of counterpoint to emphasize text is also apparent in the Requiem. In



general, the orchestral part is always secondary to the voices, possibly a representation of



the contemporary ideal of the rights of man being more important than those of the



government. Also, Mozart rarely highlights any individual part, all parts are thereby



“created equal.” More specifically, Mozart’s use of counterpoint is especially creative in



the Sequence, where the imagery and rhyme scheme of the text, unique to the requiem



service, allow Mozart creative freedom to experiment with counterpoint and various



accompanying styles.





I. Introit



Requiem aeternam dona eis



The “Requiem aeternam” or Introit is the only section of the mass that was started



and completed by Mozart alone. The text translates as “give to them eternal rest.” This



section of the score is repeated in the middle of the mass, within the “Lacrimosa,” and

again at the end of the “Agnus Dei” using repetition to provide an overall stile antico



structure to the piece.



The diversity of vocal textures within this section also shows the synthesis of the



old and new style. The section begins with an imitative Handelian subject in the basset



horns and bassoons, but by m.#15 the texture has turned homophonic and has a question



answer feel between the choir and orchestra. At m.#21 a third texture change has a



second theme (also Handelian) entering in the instruments while the soprano soloist



provides a cantus firmus. By m.#26 the instruments are given an imitative, dotted



accompaniment figure against a homophonic choir that is developing cantus firmus



material. At m.#33 the second Handelian theme returns in counterpoint with the first



theme in both the orchestra and choir. This counts as the fifth variation of texture within



thirty-three measures. Certainly this points away from stile antico and toward a new



mass style. The “Requiem aeternam” section concludes with a repeat of the homophonic



“lux perpetua” question and answer material.



Kyrie



The “Kyrie, a strict fugue, shows Mozart’s use of stile antico. The section is set



as a formal fugue though it mixes the “Kyrie” and “Christe” texts from the outset. The



“Kyrie” text is paired with a Handelian-type fugue subject and the “Christe” text is



matched with the counter-subject. Though the fugue framework is definitely stile antico,



Mozart uses his own style in developing the material. He brings the movement to a



screeching halt in m.#98 on a vii/V chord. Following a sustained silence he moves to the



dominant chord and finally ends on tonic D minor.

The orchestration, not completed by Mozart himself, is in the old colla parte



style. The string and woodwind parts were possibly filled in by Mozart’s student



Freystadtler, and the trumpet and timpani parts were completed by Sussmayr. The



orchestration to the “Kyrie” was completed quickly the movement was paired with the



“Requiem aeternum” for a memorial service given in honor of the composer only five



days after his death. The concert notes did not mention the orchestrations by Stadler,



Freystadtler, or Sussmayr, thus passing the piece off as a completed Mozart composition.







II. Sequence



The second section of the Requiem is the Sequence. The rhyme scheme follows a



repetitive aaa, bbb, ccc pattern, and Mozart uses text clues to divide the nineteen stanza



liturgical material into smaller movements. He uses those same clues as dramatic



launching pads for his musical ingenuity. For each new dramatic section, Mozart invents



and manipulates a fresh musical idea.



Dies irae



Translating as “day of wrath” and suggesting the fear and doom of Judgement



Day, the “Dies irea” uses brass and timpani to heighten the drama. Mozart also uses



scoring to translate how fear is to be rendered, “quantus tremor est futurus,” as tremelo in



all registers of the orchestra beginning with m.#1 and continuing throughout the



movement. In mm.#19-21 toward the same dramatic end, he races the violins and the



hopes of mankind in running sixteenth notes toward the repeat the stanza “day of



mourning, day of sorrow.”

In m.#40, “quantus tremor” is presented this time as a unison bass line without



counterpoint, possibly to represent man’s separation from God and the fear of Judgement



Day. This unison passage is answered by an angel chorus of the upper voices on the “day



of sorrow” text. At m.#57 a soprano and alto duet, “upon whose sentence all dependeth,”



is echoed by the tenors and basses possibly to emphasize that “all” of mankind will



experience judgement. This movement shows that the lack of counterpoint as in the



unison bass passages can also enhance the drama of the text.





Tuba mirum



A trombone solo opens the movement and is the only such instrumental solo in



the mass. The three bar motive represents the final trumpet-call on Judgement Day. The



opening motive is echoed immediately by the bass soloist in m.#3. The same motive is



again sung in a rhythmically jagged disguise by the tenor in m.#18 to represent “mors



stupebit et natura,” the quaking of nature as death approaches.



After the initial solo, the trombone continues in counterpoint as a cantabile



countermelody. This works well because the entire movement is made up of solos by all



four voice parts beginning with the bass in m.#3, continued by the tenor at m.#18, the alto



at m.#34, and finally the soprano at m.#40. The bass text includes “cognet omnes ante



thronum” or “brings all before the throne.” The solo passages may represent each



individual voice standing alone before the Throne of God, another example of scoring to



highlight the dramatic nature of the text.



At m.#45 the texture changes from cantabile to homophonic. A “sighing” figure



on the text “cum vix justus,” or “when the just are kneeling,” is sung first by soprano and



then repeated by the choir. This movement as a whole presents two interesting textures in

that it begins cantabile in the trombone and solo voice parts then turns homophonic but



keeps a memory of the overall cantabile feel in the first violin.



Rex tremendae



The “Rex tremedae” is set with the dotted rhythm of a French Overture to be



musically fit for a King. The voices enter in dramatic fashion reminiscent of a crowd



scene in an opera or oratorio. The movement begins in homophonic style with the voices



shouting “King! King!” then changes to imitative counterpoint at m.#7 possibly



representing the crowd as they chatter amongst themselves about personal salvation,



God’s gift to each individual. Here again the text is highlighted through counterpoint.



The basset horns, bassoons, and trombones give reference to stile antico in that



they play colla parte, though the alto trombone sometimes provides contrast. At m.#17, a



descending cello falls to its knees in penitence just as the voices cry a subito piano “salve



me!” The text “save me” is presented in antiphonal fashion, first women followed by



men, then falls into a homophonic choral ending written in D minor for dramatic effect.



Recordare



In this movement, the text “recodare” translates into scoring and contrapuntal



decisions that highlight and dramatize the text. The idea of man’s individual



contemplation about God may have resulted in the scoring for solo voices rather than use



of choir and certainly the double counterpoint of the ending measures required higher



thought processes.



The “Recordare” has the longest purely instrumental section of the Requiem,



thirteen bars, and synthesizes vocal and instrumental counterpoint. In mm.#1-6 the basset



horns introduce a two part vocal-like syncopated theme that is set in counterpoint with a

separate theme in the cello line. In m.#14 the syncopated theme moves to the voices



while the cello continues in counterpoint.



This movement offers six separate musical ideas that are interwoven with the



syncopated vocal theme and cello theme. Musical idea I at m.#27 is in the basset horns



and is repeated again at m.#61, II enters at m.#34 in the violins, III at m.#72 in the basset



horns and bassoons, IV at m.#84 in the first violin, V at m.#105 again in the violins, and



finally VI at m.#119 in the first basset horn. The number of musical ideas presented is



consistent with contemplation theme of the text and shows innovation beyond stile



antico.



An inversion of the II idea happens at m.#52 in the viola and first bassoon and



again at m.#54 in the viola and cello. Double counterpoint occurs at m.#118 between the



V and VI ideas in the instruments while the voices explore their own counterpoint using



the syncopated theme from m.#1. Here again, thematic inversion and the conception of



double counterpoint reinforce the “thinking” nature of the movement.



Confutatis



This section provides another example of the counterpoint and score itself



dramatizing the mass text. At m.#1 the basses enter with an angular motive on “the



confounded” which is imitated in the tenor voice just two beats later. This gives the male



voice parts the effect of shouting from below toward heaven. The counterpoint between



the two parts represents flames leaping upward from hell. The continuation of Mozart’s



theme dutifully follows the line of text “flammis acribus addictis” downward toward the



underworld.



At m.#7 the legato women’s voices enter as if angels calling down from heaven



on the text “ with the Saints, call to me” only to be once again interrupted by the doomed

and wicked men at m.#11. The conversation between heaven and earth ends at m.#26



with the bass entering two beats prior to the rest of the choir on the text “Low, I kneel.”



Descending modulations follow in a homophonic style, mm.#26-40, and illustrate the



believer’s submission and movement downward toward his knees.



Visually, the score itself is representative of man’s condition. The rhythmic



complexity of the scoring is certainly “confounding” with five different note values in



four different registers. Throughout the section, the string parts lay down a constant



barrage of sixteenth and thirty-second notes underlying (cello/bass) and burying



(violins/viola) man in a blanket of dark sin. The sixteenth note pattern only lightens to



broken to eighth notes when the “Blessed” call down to earth at m.#7. During those same



measures, mm.#7-9, the cello/bass line remains silent removing man’s bent toward sin



and death. The scoring for the instruments above the strings on the page is very open.



The texture is thin and airy representing the heavens. The overall use of counterpoint in



the “Confutatis” is in three parts, possibly hinting at the Trinity.



Lacrimosa



The Lacrimosa is based on a plainsong chant and the text “Lacrimosa dies illa” is



set with a sighing motive in both the voices and orchestra. The instruments continue the



sighing motive while in mm.#5-8 the soprano part ascends on the text “Qua resurgent ex



favilla” to represent the resurrection. Simultaneously, the eighth note syllabic pulses of



the vocal lines interrupt themselves with silence, giving the feeling of tears dropping even



as the soprano line ascends.



This movement represents Mozart’s last contribution of new material to the



Requiem with Ebler’s notation on the score “Last manuscript of Mozart.” Mozart’s ideas



do return at in later portions of the mass as repeated sections. The Larcrimosa serves as

mid-point of the mass, and the text “dona eis requiem” is present in the Introit as well as



the Agnus Dei. Structurally the Larcimosa should end with a fugue to balance the other



large sections with their fugal conclusions. In his completion of the mass, Sussmayr used



a simple, plagal “Amen” rather than a fugue. He may not have recognized the structural



need, or possibly he did not feel competent enough in the fugal style to continue the



pattern.





III Offertory



Domine Jesu



The “Domine Jesu” section of the Requiem combines the counterpoint of stile



antico with the constant shifting of textural variety of the grand mass style. A cantabile



choral introduction at m.#1 quickly begins a shift to polyphony by m.#4. The text “Rex



gloriae” in m.#3 is shouted out with a dotted “princely” rhythm uncharacteristic of the



rest of the movement. Measures #15 through #21 remain polyphonic but return to the



material from m.#1 for development. The choir cries out for rescue from the deep pit,



“ore de leonis,” at m.# 17. Stile antico style returns at m.#21 as the material is developed



and modulated through old style sequences. At m.#32 the cantibile style has returned in



canon, however, this time solo voices are used rather than tutti choir. A stile antico fugue



paying homage to Abraham’s Old Testament covenant with God, “Abrahae promisisti,”



begins at m.#44 with the “Quam olim.”



Hostias



The “Hostias” section of the Requiem begins in E flat major but, reflective of the



new style, modulates to remote keys. The “Quam olin” fugue returns at m.#55 for

structural balance, however, here as a free fugue without the colla parte instruments.



Because of its freedom from the old style, the fugue has dissolved by m.#67.







III. Sanctus/Osanna



This section of the Requiem is entirely the work of Sussmayr. Evidence to this



includes the use of the bright key of D major and the use of sharp-sided accidentals that



posed problems for instruments of the period. Also, the short fugual setting of the text



“Osanna in excelsis” is decidedly Sussmayr as Mozart himself always set the text as



“Hosanna in excelsis.” Mozart also indicated that the other major sections of the Requiem



be finalized with more extended fugues, a style in which Sussmayr was uncomfortable.







IV. Benedictus/Osanna



This section is also from Sussmayr. The Benedictus is an extended quartet of solo



voices each entering or “coming” individually with “Blessed is he that comes in the name



of the Lord” then collectively on the same text. The instrumental interludes are longer



here and begin to challenge the vocal emphasis of the stile antico style.



The concluding “Osanna” fugue elaborates on the earlier material of the Old



Covenant “Quam olim Abrahae” though in his transcribing the material, Sussmayr



reduced the length of the fugue by four measures and changed the colle parte instruments.



Basset horns now double the women’s voices while bassoons are assigned to the men.



The movement does show originality in a new style with the “Osanna” motive that moves



in a syncopated triple meter for three bars then changes to even eighth notes.

V. Agnus Dei/ Lux Aeterna/Cum Sanctis



Also the work of Sussmayr, the “Agnus Dei” returns to D minor and has far less



vocal and instrumental activity. Even given the penitent text, Mozart’s setting would



certainly have yielded a more memorable call for God’s mercy. The “Lux Aeterna”



begins with a soprano solo and is more robust in choral and instrumental material. The



movement ends, as do the other five major sections of the Requiem with a fugal nod to



the old style thus completing stile antico framework.



Throughout Mozart’s Requiem he uses counterpoint or the lack of counterpoint to



emphasize drama of the text. At one end of the spectrum he sets solo sections lacking



abundant counterpoint to represent each man’s individual accounting to God on the Day



of Judgement. In contrast, he uses double counterpoint, inversion, and multiple themes to



represent the confusion of mankind’s relation to God and sin.



Mozart’s scoring also shows his attention to the dramatic side of the text by using



dark-sided keys and innovative orchestral combinations and colorings. The dramatic



scoring of the Requiem text can be easily recognized in an angel chorus hovering above



the leaping flames as in the “Confutatis” or the shouts of “Rex gloriae” in the dotted



French Overture style of princes. The scoring can also take a more covert guise as in the



heavy blanketing of mankind with the dots and beams of running sixteenth notes in the



“Recordare.”



Most importantly, Mozart synthesizes the stile antico style with the style of the



new mass by combining traditional musical structures with new attention to the drama of



the text. He is very comfortable using the fugue as an overall structural tool while

varying textures, vocal and instrumental, within the small confines of the individual



sections of the Sequence. Mozart utilizes the color of the traditional d minor mode



alongside his constant and sometimes unexpected modulations.









Respectfully,

Kam Malone

Mozart Requiem

Midterm

Dr. Orr









Kam Malone


Related docs
Other docs by HC111208005119
PEDAG�GIAI PROGRAM
Views: 28  |  Downloads: 0
SECTOR LMR - UNIT INFORMATION
Views: 2  |  Downloads: 0
LMS & Super Late Model 500 laps
Views: 1  |  Downloads: 0
PATIENT PARTNERSHIP GROUP
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Atas Comprasnet
Views: 5  |  Downloads: 0
No Slide Title
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Modelo 2011
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
9804fr
Views: 44  |  Downloads: 0
By registering with docstoc.com you agree to our
privacy policy

You are almost ready to download!

You are almost ready to download!