Embed
Email

jackson

Document Sample

Shared by: dandanhuanghuang
Categories
Tags
Stats
views:
0
posted:
12/7/2011
language:
pages:
12
Default sharing between banks

and markets: the contribution of

collateralised loan obligations

Franke and Krahnen





Discussant Patricia Jackson







22 October 2004 1

iM147813v1

Considers an important issue

• The effect of securitisation of assets on the

risk profile of banks

• Focuses on collateralised debt obligations

(CDOs) which have seen substantial growth

over past 5years

• New issuance probably running at around

$100bn per annum world wide





22 October 2004 2

iM147813v1

Simple CDO structure

•Asset pool can be static or managed

CDO tranches

Coupons and

Assets principal Senior notes



Issuing bank Mezzanine notes

SPV

(sponsor)

Cash Funds Equity









•Tranched to target investors with different risk appetites



22 October 2004 3

iM147813v1

Paper covers a number of important

questions

• What factors influence the size of the first

loss portion

• The effect of securitisation on the loss

distribution of the bank

• How the market views securitisations, using

event studies



22 October 2004 4

iM147813v1

Moral hazard and first loss portion

• Asymmetry of information/moral hazard

• flp = f (weighted average default probability

(wadp) and Moody’s diversity score (ds))

• Moody’s list 30 industrial sectors and allocates a

weight which reflects concentration of assets in

particular industries

• Find flp is a function of PD and is larger the less

diversified the pool in terms of industrial sectors –

although latter is weakly significant.

• Consistent with first loss covering EL and taking

some of industry idiosyncratic risk

22 October 2004 5

iM147813v1

Effect on the bank’s risk profile

• Authors consider overall effect of CDOs on loss

distribution for bank, with various reinvestment strategies

for the funds

• Generate loss distributions for securitisation from quality

distribution of underlying loans and transition matrices

• Find a large part of the loss distribution remains with the

bank.

• In terms of overall loss distribution for the bank –mean

and standard deviation increase

• But the skewness and Kurtosis of the total portfolio are

reduced





22 October 2004 6

iM147813v1

Authors raise the question of effect

on systematic risk for the

intermediaries

• Argue that banks’ unexpected loss increases

• But need to take into account fact that

likelihood of extreme events affecting the

bank is less – much of the extreme risk has

been moved to bond holders

• Perhaps need to focus on a VaR measure



22 October 2004 7

iM147813v1

Core assumption in the study is the

reinvestment

•Assumes banks are increasing leverage



Makes new Makes new Makes new

loans loans loans









Passes Passes Passes

extreme extreme extreme

risk to market risk to market risk to market







Retains Retains Retains

remainder remainder remainder

22 October 2004 8

iM147813v1

But need to consider regulation

and market discipline

• Banks have to deduct first loss from

regulatory capital

• Under Basel II this structure would lead to

quite a high capital charge – so capital

would be retained against securitisation as

well as new loans

• Economic capital will depend on market

discipline - rating agencies, counterparties

22 October 2004 9

iM147813v1

Event study

• 77 securitisation issues from 27 European

banks

• look at abnormal returns from day -20 to

+20 around the announcement

• average cumulative abnormal return is

very small and statistically insignificant

• repeated securitisations increase the bank’s

beta slightly

22 October 2004 10

iM147813v1

Hypothesis

• Bank systematic risk is increased by

retention of equity /first loss piece

• So securitisation and extension of more

loans should increase a bank’s beta

• Not clear why this is the case – higher

tranches are taking the extreme risk.

• Bank may well be reducing exposure to

systematic risk

22 October 2004 11

iM147813v1

Small securitisations relative to

capital may have little effect on

market perceptions

• How a large securitisation will be received

depends on many factors

• Review of loan book by outsiders to value

tranches may be seen as positive

• Also depends on what is happening to

perceived risk relative to economic capital



22 October 2004 12

iM147813v1



Related docs
Other docs by dandanhuanghua...
CSCE_Postgrad_Research_Students_Guidelines
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
F
Views: 6  |  Downloads: 0
SDS_User_Manual
Views: 3  |  Downloads: 0
systémy - FEL wiki
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Alan Kalter - Bio 020812
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Battery Balancer - Control Board
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
cocuk_1_erkekler
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
CARLSON.TESTIMONY
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
New_York_2011_info_letter_1_
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
By registering with docstoc.com you agree to our
privacy policy

You are almost ready to download!

You are almost ready to download!