Embed
Email

Phone:

Document Sample
Phone:
Shared by: HC111207042552
Categories
Tags
Stats
views:
0
posted:
12/6/2011
language:
pages:
8
LITERACY

Audit

of

Standards

and

Achievement





School Name: ________________



Date: ________________ 2009





1

Attainment in each strand

These tables record the percentage of questions answered correctly in each strand by year group. It

gives an average across the school and identifies areas of strength and weakness. It should be

used as the basis for identifying whole school Curricular Foci, layered down for each class.





READING

Retrieval Deduction Structure Language Purpose and Text

CLASS

and and Viewpoint Features

Inference Organisation

F2 F3 F4 F5 F6 F7



Y2

L2

Y2

L3

Y3





Y4





Y5





Whole

school





WRITING

Long Task Short Task Average Both tasks

Average Mark Average Mark Mark Average Mark

Sentence Text structure and Composition Text Composition Spelling Handwriting

structure organisation and effect Structure, and effect

CLASS and punctuation

punctuation and

organisation

Band A(8) Band B(8) Band C(12) Band D(4) Band E(8) (7) (3)

Y2 % % % % % % %

Y3 % % % % % % %

Y4 % % % % % % %

Y5 % % % % % % %

Whole % % % % % % %

School

Overall strands to identify possible targets for writing

Sentence structure and Text structure and organisation Composition and effect

punctuation



Whole % % %

School









2

WHOLE SCHOOL CURRICULAR WRITING TARGETS



Autumn term: 1st half

2nd half



Spring term: 1st half

2nd half



Summer term: 1st half

2nd half



WHOLE SCHOOL CURRICULAR GUIDED READING TARGETS



Autumn term: 1st half

2nd half



Spring term: 1st half

2nd half



Summer term: 1st half

2nd half









3

School: Literacy Attainment Summary

This sheet is a whole-school summary from the attainment overviews. It allows the school to record the attainment profile for each year group.

Please include the number and percentage for each attainment category.



EYFSP EYFSP 1c 1b 1a 2c 2b 2a 3c 3b 3a 4c 4b 4a 5+ End of

Year

1-3 4-6

APS 3

APS 7 APS 9 APS11 APS13 APS15 APS17 APS19 APS21 APS23 APS25 APS27 APS29 APS31

+

Y1





Y2





Y3





Y4







Y5







Y6







EYFSP = Early Years Foundation Stage Profile

APS = Average Points Score



Age-expected level and above



Threshold level Interventions may need to be planned for these pupils



Target level Interventions should be planned for these pupils 4

Attainment over time

The table below shows the percentage of pupils at age-expected levels as indicated by their test

results; it indicates trends over time.

Year 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009



Year 2



Year 3



Year 4



Year 5



Year 6



The yellow indicates when the pupils are in year 2





READING



Comment on overall progress/achievement:

Year 3

Entered the year with …% at age expectation. At the end of the year …..% are working at age

expectation.

 ….., ….% pupils progressed by the national expectation (2 sub levels) or more

 ….., ….% pupils progressed by 1 sub level

 ….., ….% pupils made no progress

 ….., ….% pupils regressed

Drop since KS1…..%



Year 4

Entered the year with % at age expectation. At the end of the year …..% are working at age

expectation.

 ….., ….% pupils progressed by the national expectation (2 sub levels) or more

 ….., ….% pupils progressed by 1 sub level

 ….., ….% pupils made no progress

 ….., ….% pupils regressed

Drop since KS1…..%



Year 5

Entered the year with % at age expectation. At the end of the year …..% are working at age

expectation.

 ….., ….% pupils progressed by the national expectation (2 sub levels) or more

 ….., ….% pupils progressed by 1 sub level

 ….., ….% pupils made no progress

 ….., ….% pupils regressed

Drop since KS1=….%



Year 6 KS1 =…..

Entered the year with % at age expectation. At the end of the year …..% are working at age

expectation.

 ….., ….% pupils progressed by the national expectation (2 sub levels) or more

 ….., ….% pupils progressed by 1 sub level

 ….., ….% pupils made no progress

 ….., ….% pupils regressed

Drop since KS……%







5

WRITING



Comment on overall progress/achievement:

Year 3

Entered the year with …% at age expectation. At the end of the year …..% are working at age

expectation.

 ….., ….% pupils progressed by the national expectation (2 sub levels) or more

 ….., ….% pupils progressed by 1 sub level

 ….., ….% pupils made no progress

 ….., ….% pupils regressed

Drop since KS1…..%





Year 4

Entered the year with % at age expectation. At the end of the year …..% are working at age

expectation.

 ….., ….% pupils progressed by the national expectation (2 sub levels) or more

 ….., ….% pupils progressed by 1 sub level

 ….., ….% pupils made no progress

 ….., ….% pupils regressed

Drop since KS1…..%



Year 5

Entered the year with % at age expectation. At the end of the year …..% are working at age

expectation.

 ….., ….% pupils progressed by the national expectation (2 sub levels) or more

 ….., ….% pupils progressed by 1 sub level

 ….., ….% pupils made no progress

 ….., ….% pupils regressed

Drop since KS1=….%



Year 6

Entered the year with % at age expectation. At the end of the year …..% are working at age

expectation.

 ….., ….% pupils progressed by the national expectation (2 sub levels) or more

 ….., ….% pupils progressed by 1 sub level

 ….., ….% pupils made no progress

 ….., ….% pupils regressed

Drop since KS









6

Progress over the year

The national expectation is that Average Point Score (APS) should increase by one point each

term; therefore progress over the year should be 3 points. Where progress differs from this you

may want to explore the reasons why.





Year Threshold APS APS APS Comment on APS

Group APS Summer Summer Progress

2008 2009

Y6 25 Above/in line

with/below threshold

APS.

Above/in line

with/below expected

APS progress.

Y5 21 Above/in line

with/below threshold

APS.

Above/in line

with/below expected

APS progress.

Y4 19 Above/in line

with/below threshold

APS.

Above/in line

with/below expected

APS progress.

Y3 15 Above/in line

with/below threshold

APS.

Above/in line

with/below expected

APS progress.

Y2 13 Above/in line

with/below threshold

APS.

Above/in line

with/below expected

APS progress.

Y1 11 Above/in line

with/below threshold

APS.

Above/in line

with/below expected

APS progress.









7

Suggested immediate actions arising from analysis:

For example:

 Timetable in-class support according to the most needy classes/cohorts

 Allocate TA support to year groups in most need

 Plan intervention programmes

 Consider/audit training needs for TA’s for ELS, QUEST, FLS

 Schedule staff meetings to set layered Curricular Targets for each year group from whole-school

Curricular Focus

 Class teachers to be given the QCA/SAT’s results analysis to enable them to modify medium term

plans to take account of areas of weakness. Teachers to identify teaching points and success

criteria for questions which 40% or less of the class answered correctly.

 Class teachers to investigate further by referring to test papers. Particular reference may be made to

reading papers – which comprehension questions do pupils struggle with the most. In writing, are

pupils receiving maximum marks for Purpose and organisation?

 Class teachers to carry out question analysis of spelling - are strategies weak; are children using a

range of strategies e.g. strategies and or conventions? Ensure regular spelling lessons provide

opportunities to use and apply taught strategies.



Whole school issues (these will need to be investigated further and incorporated into

the maths action plan)

For example

 To what extent does the curriculum match learners’ needs and interests? Are cross-curricular links

planned for and developed?



 Are standards in line with national expectations? (Consider learners’ progress relative to their

starting points and capabilities; are there any significant variations between groups of learners; are

there trends which recur over time?)



 Coverage of the yearly teaching programme; e.g. planning scrutiny, book scrutiny



 Assessment

How are both formative and summative assessment being used to inform learning and teaching?

Are medium-term and short-term plans modified? Are Curricular Targets set and reviewed? Are

pupils, TA’s, parents and carers aware of Targets? Do Working Walls reflect and support the

Curricular Targets?



 Planning

The short-term planning for literacy should address the needs of the class and build upon pupils’

prior learning. Are teachers using the PNS Framework to support them in differentiating work? How

are they providing for more able pupils?

Are the Yearly Overviews, Text Type materials, Next Steps in Learning being used to support

planning, learning and teaching?

How often do children have access to spelling opportunities? Spelling should be taught on a regular

basis. It should be a discrete lesson – 5 sessions per fortnight. Spelling sessions should be no

more than 15 minute per session.



 Training

A programme of INSET to address curriculum weaknesses should be planned. The Literacy Co-

ordinator may pot this programme using the Learning Trust CPD booklet.

Are teachers using the materials on the PNS Framework to support their own subject knolwdge and

understanding?

Does lesson study support the needs of teachers across the school?

Are staff attending relevant Literacy training? How is this followed up back at school to allow for

maximum impact.


Other docs by HC111207042552
Minor Atom
Views: 1  |  Downloads: 0
CUM POINTS
Views: 5  |  Downloads: 0
Quick Reference:
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
ships name
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
QUEENSLAND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Delibera DG
Views: 4  |  Downloads: 0
publ ot ds belobor 2010
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
�NDICE
Views: 1  |  Downloads: 0
THE COMMANDER�S CORNER
Views: 1  |  Downloads: 0
By registering with docstoc.com you agree to our
privacy policy

You are almost ready to download!

You are almost ready to download!