Docstoc

2008 – 2009

Document Sample
2008 – 2009 Powered By Docstoc
					2011-2012 School Improvement Plan (SIP)-Form SIP-1




                             FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION




                                    School Improvement Plan (SIP)
                                             Form SIP-1

                                                Proposed for 2011-2012


April 2011                                                               1
Rule 6A-1.099811
Revised April 29, 2011
  2011-2012 School Improvement Plan (SIP)-Form SIP-1

                                                         2011 – 2012 SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN


  PART I: SCHOOL INFORMATION

  School Name: Park Lakes Elementary School                                                     District Name: Broward
  Principal: Donald Gardner                                                                     Superintendent: James Notter
  SAC Chair: Mark Andriesse                                                                     Date of School Board Approval:


  Student Achievement Data:
  The following links will open in a separate browser window. .

  School Grades Trend Data (Use this data to complete Sections 1-4 of the reading and mathematics goals and Sections 1 and 2 of the writing and science goals.)
  Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Trend Data (Use this data to complete Sections 5A-5D of the reading and mathematics goals and Section 3A-3D of the writing goals.)
  Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) Trend Data (Use this data to inform the problem-solving process when writing goals.)


  Highly Qualified Administrators

  List your school’s highly qualified administrators and briefly describe their certification(s), number of years at the current school, number of years as an administrator, and their
  prior performance record with increasing student achievement at each school. Include history of school grades, FCAT performance (Percentage data for Proficiency, Learning
  Gains, Lowest 25%), and Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP).
Position    Name                             Degree(s)/                     Number of          Number of Years      Prior Performance Record (include prior School Grades, FCAT
                                             Certification(s)               Years at           as an                (Proficiency, Learning Gains, Lowest 25%), and AYP information
                                                                            Current School     Administrator        along with the associated school year)
Principal   Donald Gardner

Assistant   Janet Phelps
Principal



  April 2011                                                                                                                                                                         2
  Rule 6A-1.099811
  Revised April 29, 2011
2011-2012 School Improvement Plan (SIP)-Form SIP-1

Highly Qualified Instructional Coaches

List your school’s highly qualified instructional coaches and briefly describe their certification(s), number of years at the current school, number of years as an instructional coach,
and their prior performance record with increasing student achievement at each school. Include history of school grades, FCAT performance (Percentage data for Proficiency,
Learning Gains, Lowest 25%), and Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP). Instructional coaches described in this section are only those who are fully released or part-time teachers in
reading, mathematics, or science and work only at the school site.
Subject                   Name                       Degree(s)/              Number of         Number of Years as      Prior Performance Record (include prior School Grades, FCAT
 Area                                              Certification(s)            Years at                 an             (Proficiency, Learning Gains, Lowest 25%), and AYP
                                                                            Current School     Instructional Coach     information along with the associated school year)




Highly Qualified Teachers
Describe the school-based strategies that will be used to recruit and retain high quality, highly qualified teachers to the school.

Description of Strategy                                                  Person Responsible                      Projected Completion Date          Not Applicable
                                                                                                                                                    (If not, please explain why)
1.
2.
3.
4.




April 2011                                                                                                                                                                         3
Rule 6A-1.099811
Revised April 29, 2011
2011-2012 School Improvement Plan (SIP)-Form SIP-1

Non-Highly Qualified Instructors
List all instructional staff and paraprofessionals who are teaching out-of-field and/or who are NOT highly qualified.

Name                                              Certification                     Teaching Assignment              Professional Development/Support to Become Highly Qualified




Staff Demographics

Please complete the following demographic information about the instructional staff in the school.

*When using percentages, include the number of teachers the percentage represents (e.g., 70% (35)).

Total Number       % of First-Year   % of Teachers       % of Teachers        % of Teachers       % of Teachers     % Highly      % Reading        % National        %
of Instructional   Teachers          with 1-5 Years of   with 6-14 Years of   with 15+ Years of   with Advanced     Qualified     Endorsed         Board Certified   ESOL Endorsed
Staff                                Experience          Experience           Experience          Degrees           Teachers      Teachers         Teachers          Teachers




Teacher Mentoring Program

Please describe the school’s teacher mentoring program by including the names of mentors, the name(s) of mentees, rationale for the pairing, and the planned
mentoring activities.

Mentor Name                                       Mentee Assigned                                 Rationale for Pairing                       Planned Mentoring Activities




April 2011                                                                                                                                                                     4
Rule 6A-1.099811
Revised April 29, 2011
2011-2012 School Improvement Plan (SIP)-Form SIP-1

Additional Requirements
Coordination and Integration-Title I Schools Only
Please describe how federal, state, and local services and programs will be coordinated and integrated in the school. Include other Title programs, Migrant and
Homeless, Supplemental Academic Instruction funds, as well as violence prevention programs, nutrition programs, housing programs, Head Start, adult education,
career and technical education, and/or job training, as applicable.

Title I, Part A

Title I, Part C- Migrant

Title I, Part D

Title II

Title III

Title X- Homeless

Supplemental Academic Instruction (SAI)

Violence Prevention Programs

Nutrition Programs

Housing Programs

Head Start

Adult Education

Career and Technical Education

Job Training
Other

April 2011                                                                                                                                                 5
Rule 6A-1.099811
Revised April 29, 2011
2011-2012 School Improvement Plan (SIP)-Form SIP-1

Response to Instruction/Intervention (RtI)
                                                                       School-Based RtI Team
Identify the school-based RtI Leadership Team.

Describe how the school-based RtI Leadership Team functions (e.g., meeting processes and roles/functions). How does it work with other school teams to
organize/coordinate RtI efforts?

Describe the role of the school-based RtI Leadership Team in the development and implementation of the school improvement plan. Describe how the RtI Problem-
solving process is used in developing and implementing the SIP?

                                                                        RtI Implementation
Describe the data source(s) and the data management system(s) used to summarize data at each tier for reading, mathematics, science, writing, and behavior.

Describe the plan to train staff on RtI.


Literacy Leadership Team (LLT)
                                                              School-Based Literacy Leadership Team
Identify the school-based Literacy Leadership Team (LLT).

Describe how the school-based LLT functions (e.g., meeting processes and roles/functions).

What will be the major initiatives of the LLT this year?




April 2011                                                                                                                                                    6
Rule 6A-1.099811
Revised April 29, 2011
2011-2012 School Improvement Plan (SIP)-Form SIP-1

NCLB Public School Choice

        Notification of School in Need of Improvement (SINI) Status
         Upload a copy of the Notification of SINI Status to Parents in the designated upload link on the “Upload” page.

        Public School Choice with Transportation (CWT) Notification
         Upload a copy of the CWT Notification to Parents in the designated upload link on the “Upload” page.

        Supplemental Educational Services (SES) Notification
         Upload a copy of the SES Notification to Parents in the designated upload link on the “Upload” page.


*Elementary Title I Schools Only: Pre-School Transition
Describe plans for assisting preschool children in transition from early childhood programs to local elementary school programs as applicable.




*Grades 6-12 Only Sec. 1003.413(b) F.S
For schools with Grades 6-12, describe the plan to ensure that teaching reading strategies is the responsibility of every teacher.




April 2011                                                                                                                                       7
Rule 6A-1.099811
Revised April 29, 2011
2011-2012 School Improvement Plan (SIP)-Form SIP-1

*High Schools Only

Note: Required for High School- Sec. 1008.37(4), F.S., Sec. 1003.413(g)(j) F.S.
How does the school incorporate applied and integrated courses to help students see the relationships between subjects and relevance to their future?




How does the school incorporate students’ academic and career planning, as well as promote student course selections, so that students’ course of study is personally meaningful?




Postsecondary Transition

Note: Required for High School- Sec. 1008.37(4), F.S.
Describe strategies for improving student readiness for the public postsecondary level based on annual analysis of the High School Feedback Report.




April 2011                                                                                                                                                                   8
Rule 6A-1.099811
Revised April 29, 2011
 2011-2012 School Improvement Plan (SIP)-Form SIP-1
 PART II: EXPECTED IMPROVEMENTS
 Reading Goals
 * When using percentages, include the number of students the percentage represents (e.g., 70% (35)).
                  READING GOALS                                                                          Problem-Solving Process to Increase Student Achievement
 Based on the analysis of student achievement data, and reference to           Anticipated Barrier                     Strategy                  Person or Position         Process Used to Determine            Evaluation Tool
     “Guiding Questions”, identify and define areas in need of                                                                                    Responsible for                Effectiveness of
               improvement for the following group:                                                                                                 Monitoring                       Strategy
1. Students achieving proficiency (FCAT Level 3) in 1.1.                          1.1.                             1.1.                    1.1.                                                           1.1.
                                                    Students’ struggle to         Teachers will plan and present Administrators,           CWT                                                            BAT assessments, BEEP
reading                                             demonstrate critical thinking lessons that challenge students’ Curriculum Facilitator,                                                                assessments, Mock FCAT,
Reading Goal #1:                                                         skills.                         critical thinking skills.            Reading Coach,            Meetings with individual teachers CWT logs
                                                                                                                                              Classroom Teacher         following each classroom
                                  2011 Current       2012 Expected
                                                                                                         Teachers will model the “think                                 walkthrough
                                  Level of           Level of
                                                                                                         aloud” strategy during daily
By June 2012, the percentage of   Performance:*      Performance:*
                                                                                                         reading instruction.                                           Data chats will be held to discuss
students scoring Level 3 on the   Enter numerical    Enter numerical                                                                                                    the academic progress of every
FCAT 2.0 Reading assessment       data for current   data for expected                                   Teachers will integrate higher                                 student
will increase by at least 4%.     level of           level of                                            order thinking questions during
                                  performance in     performance in                                      whole and small group
                                  this box.          this box.                                           instruction each day.



                                                                         1.2.                            1.2.                                1.2.                       1.2.                                 1.2.
                                                                         Students’ lack oral reading     A Readers’ Theatre program will Administrators,                CWT                                  CWT logs, ORF scores on
                                                                         fluency, which negatively       be implemented for students in Curriculum Facilitator,                                              Virtual Counselor
                                                                         impacts their reading           grades 3-5 during the 2011-2012 Reading Coach,                 Meetings with individual teachers
                                                                         comprehension skills.           school year. Research has shown Classroom Teachers             following each classroom
                                                                                                         that readers’ theatre is an                                    walkthrough
                                                                                                         effective strategy that targets the
                                                                                                         development of oral reading                                    Data chats will be held to discuss
                                                                                                         fluency skills.                                                the academic progress of every
                                                                                                                                                                        student
                                                                         1.3.                            1.3.                                 1.3.                      1.3                               1.3.
                                                                         Students’ need to develop the   Teachers will integrate              Administrators,           CWT                               CWT logs, benchmark-
                                                                         skills necessary to determine   technology in daily reading          Curriculum Facilitator,                                     specific assessment scores,
                                                                         the meaning of unfamiliar       instruction and will use real-life   Reading Coach,            Meetings with individual teachers formal/informal
                                                                         words.                          examples to help students            Classroom Teachers        following each classroom          assessments
                                                                                                         connect to the information being                               walkthrough
                                                                                                         presented.
                                                                                                                                                                        Data chats will be held to discuss
                                                                                                                                                                        the academic progress every
                                                                                                                                                                        student.
 Based on the analysis of student achievement data, and reference to           Anticipated Barrier                     Strategy                  Person or Position          Process Used to Determine           Evaluation Tool
     “Guiding Questions”, identify and define areas in need of                                                                                    Responsible for                 Effectiveness of
               improvement for the following group:                                                                                                 Monitoring                        Strategy

 April 2011                                                                                                                                                                                                                    9
 Rule 6A-1.099811
 Revised April 29, 2011
 2011-2012 School Improvement Plan (SIP)-Form SIP-1
2. Students achieving above proficiency                                2.1.                             2.1.                                2.1.                      2.1.                                 2.1.
                                                                       Teacher training is needed on    A staff development will be         Administrators,           CWT                                  CWT logs
(FCAT Levels 4 and 5) in reading                                       how to create cross curricular   created on how to create            Curriculum Facilitator,
Reading Goal #2:                                                       activities that align to the     engaging cross curricula            Reading Coach,            Meetings with individual teachers
                                                                       NGSSS Reading                    activities that will challenge      Classroom Teachers        following each classroom
                                  2011 Current      2012 Expected
                                                                                                        high-achieving students.                                      walkthrough
                                  Level of          Level of
By June 2012, the percent of      Performance:*     Performance:*
                                                                                                                                                                      Data chats will be held to discuss
students scoring Level 4 and 5 on Enter numerical Enter numerical
                                                                                                                                                                      the academic progress of every
the FCAT 2.0 Reading will         data for current data for expected                                                                                                  student
increase by at least 4%           level of         level of
                                  performance in    performance in
                                  this box.         this box.




                                                                       2.2.                             2.2.                                2.2.                      2.2.                                 2.2.
                                                                       There is a need for teacher      A staff development will be         Administrators,           CWT                                  CWT logs
                                                                       training on the integration of   created on how to use projects to   Curriculum Facilitator,
                                                                       projects-based learning as       extend learning for high-           Reading Coach             Meetings with individual teachers
                                                                       extended learning activities     achieving students                                            following each classroom
                                                                                                                                                                      walkthrough

                                                                                                                                                                      Data chats will be held to discuss
                                                                                                                                                                      the academic progress of every
                                                                                                                                                                      student

                                                                       2.3                              2.3                                 2.3                       2.3                                  2.3
                                                                       There is a need for teacher      A staff development will be         Administrators,           CWT                                  CWT logs, scores entered
                                                                       training on developing           created on how to develop           Curriculum Facilitator,                                        on Virtual Counselor
                                                                       challenging and engaging         challenging and engaging            Reading Coach             Meetings with individual teachers
                                                                       lessons for high-achieving       lessons for high-achieving                                    following each classroom
                                                                       students                         students.                                                     walkthrough

                                                                                                                                                                      Data chats will be held to discuss
                                                                                                                                                                      the academic progress of every
                                                                                                                                                                      student

 Based on the analysis of student achievement data, and reference to        Anticipated Barrier                      Strategy                  Person or Position         Process Used to Determine             Evaluation Tool
     “Guiding Questions”, identify and define areas in need of                                                                                  Responsible for                Effectiveness of
               improvement for the following group:                                                                                               Monitoring                       Strategy
3. Percentage of students making Learning Gains in 3.1.                                                 3.1.                                3.1.                      3.1.                              3.1.
                                                   Students have low oral                               Integrate a Readers’ Theatre        Administrators,           CWT                               CWT logs, ORF scores
reading                                            reading fluency skills                               Program in grades 3-5.              Curriculum Facilitator,                                     entered on Virtual
Reading Goal #3:                                                                                                                            Reading Coach,            Meetings with individual teachers Counselor and maintained
                                                                                                        Administer weekly ORFs to           Classroom Teachers        following each classroom          in each student’s reading
                                  2011 Current      2012 Expected
                                                                                                        struggling readers                                            walkthrough                       portfolio
                                  Level of          Level of
By June 2012, students making     Performance:*     Performance:*


 April 2011                                                                                                                                                                                                                    10
 Rule 6A-1.099811
 Revised April 29, 2011
 2011-2012 School Improvement Plan (SIP)-Form SIP-1
learning gains will show a 10%     Enter numerical    Enter numerical                                   Students will be encouraged to                               Data chats will be held to discuss   RTI
point increase on the FCAT         data for current   data for expected                                 attend FCAT Camp                                             the academic progress of every
2.0Reading assessment              level of           level of                                                                                                       student
                                   performance in     performance in
                                   this box.          this box.




                                                                          3.2.                           3.2.                              3.2.                      3.2.                                 3.2.
                                                                          Limited resources available to Provide a training to show        Administrators,           Chart mini-BEEP assessment           CWT logs
                                                                          deliver instruction on         teachers how to access the        Curriculum Facilitator,   results, CWT
                                                                          individual student’s           Treasures grade level textbooks   Coach, Classroom
                                                                          independent reading level      and student workbooks online      Teachers
                                                                          (e.g. a 4th grade student      via the BEEP portal
                                                                          reading on a 2nd grade level
                                                                          should be provided books for
                                                                          independent reading on the
                                                                          2nd grade level)
                                                                          3.3.                           3.3.                              3.3.                     3.3.                                  3.3.
                                                                          Limited availability of high Allow students to self-select       Media Specialist,/Clerk, CWT                                   CWT logs, RTI
                                                                          interest books for students    books from the Media Center,      Curriculum Facilitator,
                                                                                                         especially AR books               Coach, Classroom
                                                                                                                                           Teachers
                                                                                                        Ensure books are arranged by
                                                                                                        common theme and lexile levels
                                                                                                        in the Media Center
 Based on the analysis of student achievement data, and reference to           Anticipated Barrier                  Strategy                  Person or Position         Process Used to Determine              Evaluation Tool
     “Guiding Questions”, identify and define areas in need of                                                                                 Responsible for                Effectiveness of
               improvement for the following group:                                                                                              Monitoring                       Strategy
4. Percentage of students in Lowest 25% making                            4.1.                          4.1.                               4.1.                      4.1.                                 4.1.
                                                                          Students need additional      Daily utilization of Triumphs;     Administrators,           CWT                                  CWT logs, RTI, data chats,
learning gains in reading                                                 support to master basic       increase exposure to the FCAT      Curriculum Facilitator,                                        formal and informal
Reading Goal #4:                                                          reading skills such as        stem questions, QAR strategy,      Coach, Classroom                                               assessments
                                                                          phonics, phonemic             higher order thinking questions    Teachers
                                   2011 Current       2012 Expected
                                                                          awareness, vocabulary, and    during small and whole group
                                   Level of           Level of
                                                                          comprehension                 instruction, the use of graphic
By June 2012, students in the      Performance:*      Performance:*
                                                                                                        organizers to enhance
lowest 25th percentile will show   Enter numerical    Enter numerical                                   understanding, differentiated
8% learning gains on the FCAT      data for current   data for expected                                 instruction, FCAT Camp
2.0 Reading Assessment             level of           level of
                                   performance in     performance in                                    Students will be encouraged to
                                   this box.          this box.                                         attend FCAT Camp




 April 2011                                                                                                                                                                                                                   11
 Rule 6A-1.099811
 Revised April 29, 2011
 2011-2012 School Improvement Plan (SIP)-Form SIP-1



                                                                         4.2.                           4.2.                             4.2.                      4.2.                            4.2.
                                                                         Increase instructional time-   Students in grades 3-5 will be   Administrators,           CWT, BEEP assessments, teacher- CWT logs, scores entered
                                                                         on-task                        grouped for differentiated       Curriculum Facilitator,   made assessments; data chats    in Virtual Counselor
                                                                                                        instruction based on FCAT test   Coach, Classroom
                                                                                                        results                          Teachers
                                                                         4.3                            4.3.                             4.3.                      4.3.                            4.3.
                                                                         Training needed for use of the Teachers will attend school-     Administrators,           CWT, data chats, shared best    CWT logs
                                                                         resources provided on the      based workshops on how to use    Curriculum Facilitator,   practices
                                                                         District’s Struggling Readers the resources listed on the       Coach, Classroom
                                                                         Chart                          Struggling Readers Chart         Teachers, Instructional
                                                                                                                                         Leaders

 Based on the analysis of student achievement data, and reference to             Anticipated Barrier               Strategy                 Person or Position         Process Used to Determine           Evaluation Tool
     “Guiding Questions”, identify and define areas in need of                                                                               Responsible for                Effectiveness of
            improvement for the applicable subgroup(s):                                                                                        Monitoring                       Strategy
5A. Student subgroups             Reading Goal #5A:                      5A.1.                          5A.1.                            5A.1.                     5A.1.                           5A.1.
                                                                         White:
not making Adequate               Ethnicity                              Black:
Yearly Progress (AYP) in          (White, Black, Hispanic, Asian,
                                                                         Hispanic:
                                  American Indian)
reading                                                                  Asian:
                                                                         American Indian:
Reading Goal #5A:

                                  2011 Current       2012 Expected
                                  Level of           Level of
                                  Performance:*      Performance:*
                                  Enter numerical    Enter numerical
                                  data for current   data for expected
                                  level of           level of
                                  performance in     performance in
                                  this box.          this box.
                                  White:           White:
                                  Black:           Black:
                                  Hispanic:        Hispanic:
                                  Asian:           Asian:
                                  American Indian: American Indian:
                                                                         5A.2.                          5A.2.                            5A.2.                     5A.2.                           5A.2.
                                                                         5A.3.                          5A.3.                            5A.3.                     5A.3.                           5A.3.
 Based on the analysis of student achievement data, and reference to          Anticipated Barrier                  Strategy                 Person or Position         Process Used to Determine           Evaluation Tool
     “Guiding Questions”, identify and define areas in need of                                                                               Responsible for                Effectiveness of
             improvement for the following subgroup:                                                                                           Monitoring                       Strategy
5B. Student subgroups    Reading Goal #5B:                               5B.1.                          5B.1.                            5B.1.                     5B.1.                           5B.1.
not making Adequate      English Language
Yearly Progress (AYP) in Learners (ELL)
 April 2011                                                                                                                                                                                                              12
 Rule 6A-1.099811
 Revised April 29, 2011
 2011-2012 School Improvement Plan (SIP)-Form SIP-1
reading
Reading Goal #5B:

                                   2011 Current       2012 Expected
                                   Level of           Level of
Enter narrative for the goal in    Performance:*      Performance:*
this box.                          Enter numerical    Enter numerical
                                   data for current   data for expected
                                   level of           level of
                                   performance in     performance in
                                   this box.          this box.
                                                                          5B.2.                         5B.2.              5B.2.                   5B.2.                           5B.2.
                                                                          5B.3.                         5B.3.              5B.3.                   5B.3.                           5B.3.
  Based on the analysis of student achievement data, and reference to             Anticipated Barrier           Strategy      Person or Position       Process Used to Determine           Evaluation Tool
      “Guiding Questions”, identify and define areas in need of                                                                Responsible for              Effectiveness of
              improvement for the following subgroup:                                                                            Monitoring                     Strategy
5C. Student subgroups Reading Goal #5C:             5C.1.                                               5C.1.              5C.1.                   5C.1.                           5C.1.
not making Adequate      Students with Disabilities
Yearly Progress (AYP) in (SWD)
reading
Reading Goal #5C:

                                   2011 Current       2012 Expected
                                   Level of           Level of
Enter narrative for the goal in    Performance:*      Performance:*
this box.                          Enter numerical    Enter numerical
                                   data for current   data for expected
                                   level of           level of
                                   performance in     performance in
                                   this box.          this box.

                                                                          5C.2.                         5C.2.              5C.2.                   5C.2.                           5C.2.

                                                                          5C.3.                         5C.3.              5C.3.                   5C.3.                           5C.3.

  Based on the analysis of student achievement data, and reference to             Anticipated Barrier           Strategy      Person or Position       Process Used to Determine           Evaluation Tool
      “Guiding Questions”, identify and define areas in need of                                                                Responsible for              Effectiveness of
              improvement for the following subgroup:                                                                            Monitoring                     Strategy
5D. Student subgroups Reading Goal #5D:                                   5D.1.                         5D.1.              5D.1.                   5D.1.                           5D.1.
not making Adequate      Economically
Yearly Progress (AYP) in Disadvantaged
reading
Reading Goal #5D:

 April 2011                                                                                                                                                                                              13
 Rule 6A-1.099811
 Revised April 29, 2011
 2011-2012 School Improvement Plan (SIP)-Form SIP-1


                                    2011 Current        2012 Expected
                                    Level of            Level of
Enter narrative for the goal in     Performance:*       Performance:*
this box.                           Enter numerical     Enter numerical
                                    data for current    data for expected
                                    level of            level of
                                    performance in      performance in
                                    this box.           this box.
                                                                            5D.2.                      5D.2.                            5D.2.                    5D.2.                          5D.2.

                                                                            5D.3.                      5D.3.                            5D.3.                    5D.3.                          5D.3.




                 Professional Development (PD) aligned with Strategies through Professional Learning Community (PLC) or PD Activity
                                                                      Please note that each Strategy does not require a professional development or PLC activity.
     PD Content /Topic                                                                                            Target Dates and Schedules
                                                       PD Facilitator               PD Participants
     and/or PLC Focus                Grade                                                                          (e.g. , Early Release) and                                           Person or Position Responsible for
                                                          and/or          (e.g. , PLC, subject, grade level, or                                      Strategy for Follow-up/Monitoring
                                  Level/Subject                                                                   Schedules (e.g., frequency of                                                     Monitoring
                                                        PLC Leader                   school-wide)
                                                                                                                             meetings)




 Reading Budget (Insert rows as needed)
 Include only school-based funded activities/materials and exclude district funded activities/materials.
 Evidence-based Program(s)/Materials(s)
 Strategy                                                  Description of Resources                                 Funding Source                                        Amount



                                                                                                                                                                                                              Subtotal:
 Technology
 Strategy                                                  Description of Resources                                 Funding Source                                        Amount




 April 2011                                                                                                                                                                                                          14
 Rule 6A-1.099811
 Revised April 29, 2011
 2011-2012 School Improvement Plan (SIP)-Form SIP-1
                                                                                                                                                                                                               Subtotal:
 Professional Development
 Strategy                                              Description of Resources                                    Funding Source                                         Amount



                                                                                                                                                                                                               Subtotal:
 Other
 Strategy                                              Description of Resources                                    Funding Source                                         Amount


                                                                                                                                                                                                               Subtotal:
                                                                                                                                                                                                                 Total:
 End of Reading Goals
 Mathematics Goals
 * When using percentages, include the number of students the percentage represents (e.g. 70% (35)).
             MATHEMATICS GOALS                                                                        Problem-Solving Process to Increase Student Achievement
 Based on the analysis of student achievement data, and reference to         Anticipated Barrier                  Strategy                 Person or Position         Process Used to Determine        Evaluation Tool
     “Guiding Questions”, identify and define areas in need of                                                                              Responsible for                Effectiveness of
               improvement for the following group:                                                                                           Monitoring                       Strategy
1. Students achieving proficiency (Level 3) in                          1.1.                          1.1.                             1.1.                       1.1.                            1.1.
                                                                        Content exposure is grade     Provide staff development on the Administrators,            Data chats, CWT, Lesson Plans   CWT logs, scores entered
mathematics                                                             level specific                grade level specific benchmarks Curriculum Facilitator,                                     on Virtual Counselor
Mathematics Goal #1:                                                                                  (i.e. Test Item Specifications)  Classroom Teachers
                                                                                                      and grade level expectations
                                 2011 Current       2012 Expected
                                 Level of           Level of
By June 2012, students scoring a Performance:*      Performance:*
level 3 on the FCAT 2.0
                                 Enter numerical    Enter numerical
Mathematics will show a 5%
                                 data for current   data for expected
increase
                                 level of           level of
                                 performance in     performance in
                                 this box.          this box.

                                                                        1.2.                          1.2.                              1.2.                      1.2.                            1.2.
                                                                        There is a large number of    Teachers will use manipulatives   Administrators,           CWT, Data chats                 CWT logs, scores entered
                                                                        multiple-step word problems   to help students transfer         Curriculum Facilitator,                                   on Virtual Counselor
                                                                        which poses a challenge to    knowledge from the concrete to    Classroom Teachers
                                                                        students who are not fluent   the abstract
                                                                        readers or lack reading
                                                                        comprehension skills

 April 2011                                                                                                                                                                                                           15
 Rule 6A-1.099811
 Revised April 29, 2011
 2011-2012 School Improvement Plan (SIP)-Form SIP-1

                                                                         1.3.                             1.3.                              1.3.                      1.3.                              1.3.
                                                                         Teachers need additional         Teachers will attend district and Administrators,           CWT, Data chats, Lesson Plans     CWT logs, scores entered
                                                                         training on the NGSSS            school-based trainings on the     Curriculum Facilitator                                      on Virtual Counselor
                                                                         Mathematics and effective        NGSSS Mathematics
                                                                         teaching strategies, including
                                                                         the use of the Go Math!
                                                                         Technology resources for
                                                                         teachers and students

 Based on the analysis of student achievement data, and reference to          Anticipated Barrier                     Strategy                 Person or Position         Process Used to Determine          Evaluation Tool
     “Guiding Questions”, identify and define areas in need of                                                                                  Responsible for                Effectiveness of
               improvement for the following group:                                                                                               Monitoring                       Strategy
2. Students achieving above proficiency                                  2.1.                             2.1.                              2.1.                      2.1.                              2.1.
                                                                         Students need for frequent       Teachers will use daily word      Administrators,           CWT, Lesson plans, Data chats     CWT logs, scores entered
(Levels 4 and 5) in mathematics                                          practice and exposure to         problems for morning work and     Curriculum Facilitator,                                     in Virtual Counselor
Mathematics Goal #2:                                                     complex math word                lesson/skill review               Classroom Teachers
                                                                         problems.
                                  2011 Current       2012 Expected
                                  Level of           Level of
By June 2012, students scoring    Performance:*      Performance:*
levels 4 and 5 on the FCAT
                                  Enter numerical    Enter numerical
2.0Mathematics will show a 4%
                                  data for current   data for expected
increase.
                                  level of           level of
                                  performance in     performance in
                                  this box.          this box.




                                                                         2.2.                            2.2.                               2.2.                      2.2.                              2.2.
                                                                         There is a need to increase the Teachers will share best           Administrators,           CWT, Lesson Plans                 CWT logs, Software-
                                                                         use of technology by both       practices with their grade level   Curriculum Facilitator,                                     generated reports,
                                                                         teachers and students, to       teachers. Teachers will utilize    Classroom Teachers
                                                                         enhance daily math              the Go Math! Professional
                                                                         instruction and student         Development Podcasts and learn
                                                                         learning                        to access the Go Math! online
                                                                                                         resources. Students will also
                                                                                                         utilize Odyssey, Riverdeep, and
                                                                                                         FCAT Explorer. Students will
                                                                                                         learn to access online resources
                                                                                                         while at home and at school, in
                                                                                                         order to supplement in-class
                                                                                                         instruction
                                                                         2.3                             2.3                                2.3                      2.3                                2.3
                                                                         Teacher training is needed on Teachers will attend a school-       Administrators,          Shared best practices, CWT, data   CWT logs
                                                                         the Go Math! Center             based staff development on how     Curriculum Facilitators, chats
                                                                         Activities Kit                  to use the Go Math! Center         Classroom Teachers
                                                                                                         Activities during the dialy math
 April 2011                                                                                                                                                                                                                   16
 Rule 6A-1.099811
 Revised April 29, 2011
 2011-2012 School Improvement Plan (SIP)-Form SIP-1
                                                                                                         block
 Based on the analysis of student achievement data, and reference to         Anticipated Barrier                     Strategy                   Person or Position         Process Used to Determine           Evaluation Tool
     “Guiding Questions”, identify and define areas in need of                                                                                   Responsible for                Effectiveness of
               improvement for the following group:                                                                                                Monitoring                       Strategy
3. Percentage of students making learning gains in                      3.1.                             3.1.                                3.1.                      3.1.                               3.1.
                                                                        Teachers need to increase the    Teachers will share best            Administrators,           CWT, Data chats                    CWT logs, formal/informal
mathematics (excluding 9th grade; learning gains will                   frequency of use of the          practices and access intervention   Curriculum Facilitator,                                      assessments, scores entered
not be available for this grade)                                        intervention resources           resources online                    Classroom Teachers,                                          in Virtual Counselor
                                                                        provided with the Go Math!                                           Instructional Leaders
Mathematics Goal #3:                                                    series
                                 2011 Current       2012Expected
                                 Level of           Level of
By June 2012, students’ learning Performance:*      Performance:*
gains will increase by 4% on the
                                 Enter numerical    Enter numerical
FCAT 2.0 Mathematics
                                 data for current   data for expected
Assessment
                                 level of           level of
                                 performance in     performance in
                                 this box.          this box.




                                                                        3.2.                             3.2                               3.2.                        3.2.                               3.2.
                                                                        Students need differentiated     A professional development will Administrators,               CWT, Data chats                    CWT logs, scores entered
                                                                        instruction tailored to meet     be presented on how to            Curriculum Facilitator                                         in Virtual Counselor,
                                                                        their targeted area(s) of        differentiate instruction to meet                                                                teacher-made assessments
                                                                        weakness in mathematics.         the needs of individual students.

                                                                        3.3.                             3.3.                              3.3.                        3..3.                              3.3.
                                                                        Students lack basic math         Teachers will increase the use of Administration,             CWT, Data chats                    CWT logs, scores entered
                                                                        skills such as multiplication,   manipulatives to teach basic      Curriculum Facilitator,                                        in Virtual Counselor,
                                                                        double-digit subtraction,        math skills. Teachers will also Classroom teachers                                               teacher-made assessments
                                                                        division, etc.                   increase time for students to
                                                                                                         practice basic math skills using
                                                                                                         the online Go Math! Intervention
                                                                                                         Resources
 Based on the analysis of student achievement data, and reference to         Anticipated Barrier                      Strategy                  Person or Position         Process Used to Determine           Evaluation Tool
     “Guiding Questions”, identify and define areas in need of                                                                                   Responsible for                Effectiveness of
               improvement for the following group:                                                                                                Monitoring                       Strategy
4. Percentage of students in Lowest 25% making                          4.1.                             4.1.                                4.1.                      4.1.                               4.1.
                                                                        Teachers must have common        Teachers will share best            Administrators,           Data chats, attendance at weekly   Lesson plans indicating
learning gains in mathematics                                           planning time to share best      practices during their weekly       Curriculum Facilitator,   team meetings                      differentiated instruction
Mathematics Goal #4:                                                    practices.                       grade level meetings.               Team Leaders,
                                                                                                                                             Classroom Teachers
                                  2011 Current      2012 Expected
                                                                                                         Students will be encouraged to
                                  Level of          Level of
                                                                                                         attend FCAT Camp
By June 2012, students in the     Performance:*     Performance:*

 April 2011                                                                                                                                                                                                                     17
 Rule 6A-1.099811
 Revised April 29, 2011
 2011-2012 School Improvement Plan (SIP)-Form SIP-1
lowest 25th percentile will show a Enter numerical    Enter numerical
4% point increase on the FCAT data for current        data for expected
2.0 Mathematics Assessment         level of           level of
                                   performance in     performance in
                                   this box.          this box.




                                                                          4.2.                           4.2.                             4.2.                      4.2.                            4.2.
                                                                          Limited supplemental support Daily Math specials targeted at    Administrators,           CWT, data chats                 CWT logs, Scores entered
                                                                          for students who need          reinforcing math benchmarks ;    Curriculum Facilitator,                                   in Virtual Counselor,
                                                                          additional support in order to collaboration between the        Classroom Teachers                                        formal/informal
                                                                          achieve mastery of the grade Specials teacher and classroom                                                               assessment scores
                                                                          level benchmarks.              teachers
                                                                          4.3.                           4.3.                             4.3.                      4.3.                            4.3.
                                                                          Students who struggle in       Daily math vocabulary review.    Administrators,           CWT, review students’ math      CWT logs, formal/informal
                                                                          reading need to strengthen                                      Curriculum Facilitator,   journals, math word walls       assessment scores
                                                                          math vocabulary.               Students will maintain a math    Classroom Teachers
                                                                                                         journal with vocabulary words.

                                                                                                        Math Word Walls
  Based on the analysis of student achievement data, and reference to          Anticipated Barrier                Strategy                   Person or Position         Process Used to Determine           Evaluation Tool
      “Guiding Questions”, identify and define areas in need of                                                                               Responsible for                Effectiveness of
             improvement for the applicable subgroup(s):                                                                                        Monitoring                       Strategy
5A. Student subgroups              Mathematics Goal #5A:                  5A.1.                         5A.1.                             5A.1.                     5A.1.                           5A.1.
                                                                          White:
not making Adequate                Ethnicity                              Black:
Yearly Progress (AYP) in           (White, Black, Hispanic, Asian,
                                                                          Hispanic:
                                   American Indian)
mathematics                                                               Asian:
                                                                          American Indian:
Mathematics Goal #5A:
                                   2011 Current       2012 Expected
                                   Level of           Level of
Enter narrative for the goal in    Performance:*      Performance:*
this box.                          Enter numerical    Enter numerical
                                   data for current   data for expected
                                   level of           level of
                                   performance in     performance in
                                   this box.          this box.
                                   White:           White:
                                   Black:           Black:
                                   Hispanic:        Hispanic:
                                   Asian:           Asian:
                                   American Indian: American Indian:
                                                                          5A.2.                         5A.2.                             5A.2.                     5A.2.                           5A.2.

 April 2011                                                                                                                                                                                                               18
 Rule 6A-1.099811
 Revised April 29, 2011
 2011-2012 School Improvement Plan (SIP)-Form SIP-1
                                                                          5A.3.                         5A.3.              5A.3.                   5A.3.                           5A.3.
  Based on the analysis of student achievement data, and reference to          Anticipated Barrier              Strategy      Person or Position       Process Used to Determine           Evaluation Tool
      “Guiding Questions”, identify and define areas in need of                                                                Responsible for              Effectiveness of
              improvement for the following subgroup:                                                                            Monitoring                     Strategy
5B. Student subgroups    Mathematics Goal #5B:                            5B.1.                         5B.1.              5B.1.                   5B.1.                           5B.1.
not making Adequate      English Language
Yearly Progress (AYP) in Learners (ELL)
mathematics
Mathematics Goal #5B:
                                   2011 Current       2012 Expected
                                   Level of           Level of
Enter narrative for the goal in    Performance:*      Performance:*
this box.
                                   Enter numerical    Enter numerical
                                   data for current   data for expected
                                   level of           level of
                                   performance in     performance in
                                   this box.          this box.
                                                                          5B.2.                         5B.2.              5B.2.                   5B.2.                           5B.2.

                                                                          5B.3                          5B.3.              5B.3.                   5B.3.                           5B.3.


  Based on the analysis of student achievement data, and reference to             Anticipated Barrier           Strategy      Person or Position       Process Used to Determine           Evaluation Tool
      “Guiding Questions”, identify and define areas in need of                                                                Responsible for              Effectiveness of
              improvement for the following subgroup:                                                                            Monitoring                     Strategy
5C. Student subgroups Mathematics Goal #5C: 5C.1.                                                       5C.1.              5C.1.                   5C.1.                           5C.1.
not making Adequate      Students with Disabilities
Yearly Progress (AYP) in (SWD)
mathematics
Mathematics Goal #5C:
                                   2011 Current       2012 Expected
                                   Level of           Level of
Enter narrative for the goal in    Performance:*      Performance:*
this box.
                                   Enter numerical    Enter numerical
                                   data for current   data for expected
                                   level of           level of
                                   performance in     performance in
                                   this box.          this box.



                                                                          5C.2.                         5C.2.              5C.2.                   5C.2.                           5C.2.

                                                                          5C.3.                         5C.3.              5C.3.                   5C.3.                           5C.3.


 April 2011                                                                                                                                                                                              19
 Rule 6A-1.099811
 Revised April 29, 2011
 2011-2012 School Improvement Plan (SIP)-Form SIP-1
  Based on the analysis of student achievement data, and reference to          Anticipated Barrier               Strategy                Person or Position         Process Used to Determine            Evaluation Tool
      “Guiding Questions”, identify and define areas in need of                                                                           Responsible for                Effectiveness of
              improvement for the following subgroup:                                                                                       Monitoring                       Strategy
5D. Student subgroups Mathematics Goal #5D:                                5D.1.                     5D.1.                           5D.1.                     5D.1.                             5D.1.
not making Adequate      Economically
Yearly Progress (AYP) in Disadvantaged
mathematics
Mathematics Goal #5D:
                                    2011 Current       2012 Expected
                                    Level of           Level of
Enter narrative for the goal in     Performance:*      Performance:*
this box.
                                    Enter numerical    Enter numerical
                                    data for current   data for expected
                                    level of           level of
                                    performance in     performance in
                                    this box.          this box.


                                                                           5D.2.                     5D.2.                           5D.2.                     5D.2.                             5D.2.

                                                                           5D.3.                     5D.3.                           5D.3.                     5D.3.                             5D.3.




                Professional Development (PD) aligned with Strategies through Professional Learning Community (PLC) or PD Activity
                                                                   Please note that each Strategy does not require a professional development or PLC activity.
     PD Content /Topic                                                                                          Target Dates and Schedules
                                                    PD Facilitator               PD Participants
     and/or PLC Focus                Grade                                                                       (e.g. , Early Release) and                                              Person or Position Responsible for
                                                       and/or          (e.g. , PLC, subject, grade level, or                                       Strategy for Follow-up/Monitoring
                                  Level/Subject                                                                Schedules (e.g., frequency of                                                        Monitoring
                                                     PLC Leader                   school-wide)
                                                                                                                          meetings)




 Mathematics Budget (Insert rows as needed)
 Include only school-based funded activities/materials and exclude district funded activities /materials.
 Evidence-based Program(s)/Materials(s)
 Strategy                                                 Description of Resources                                Funding Source                                        Amount




 April 2011                                                                                                                                                                                                            20
 Rule 6A-1.099811
 Revised April 29, 2011
 2011-2012 School Improvement Plan (SIP)-Form SIP-1
                                                                                                                                                                                                       Subtotal:
 Technology
 Strategy                                              Description of Resources                            Funding Source                                          Amount



                                                                                                                                                                                                       Subtotal:
 Professional Development
 Strategy                                              Description of Resources                            Funding Source                                          Amount



                                                                                                                                                                                                       Subtotal:
 Other
 Strategy                                              Description of Resources                            Funding Source                                          Amount


                                                                                                                                                                                                       Subtotal:
                                                                                                                                                                                                           Total:
 End of Mathematics Goals

 Science Goals
 * When using percentages, include the number of students the percentage represents next to the percentage (e.g. 70% (35)).
                   SCIENCE GOALS                                                              Problem-Solving Process to Increase Student Achievement
 Based on the analysis of student achievement data, and reference to    Anticipated Barrier               Strategy                  Person or Position         Process Used to Determine        Evaluation Tool
     “Guiding Questions”, identify and define areas in need of                                                                       Responsible for                Effectiveness of
               improvement for the following group:                                                                                    Monitoring                       Strategy
1. Students achieving proficiency (FCAT Level 3) in 1.1.                           1.1.                                          1.1.                      1.1.                            1.1.
                                                    Science is not taught daily at Teachers will adhere to the                   Administrators,           CWT, lesson plans, HOST         BAT results, BEEP
science                                             all grade levels               district’s curriculum map for                 Curriculum Facilitator,   observations, data chats        assessment results, CWT
Science Goal #1:                                                                              science instruction at all grade   Classroom Teachers,                                       logs
                                                                                              levels. Also, Hands-on Science     Instructional Leaders
                                 2011 Current       2012 Expected
                                                                                              activities will be conduct every
                                 Level of           Level of
                                                                                              early release day (i.e. HOST –
By June 2012, students will show Performance:*      Performance:*
                                                                                              Hands-on Science Thursday)
a 10% point increase on the      Enter numerical    Enter numerical
FCAT 2.0 Science Assessment      data for current   data for expected
                                  level of          level of
                                  performance in    performance in

 April 2011                                                                                                                                                                                                   21
 Rule 6A-1.099811
 Revised April 29, 2011
 2011-2012 School Improvement Plan (SIP)-Form SIP-1
                                     this box.           this box.



                                                                      1.2.                          1.2.                                1.2.                             1.2.                               1.2.
                                                                      Teachers lack training on the Teachers will attend the district’s Administrators,                  CWT, lesson plans, data chats      BAT scores, formal and
                                                                      newly adopted science series. science workshops                   Curriculum Facilitator,                                             informal assessments
                                                                                                                                        Classroom Teachers
                                                                      1.3.                          1.3.                                1.3.                             1.3.                               1.3.
                                                                      Teachers lack training on the Teachers will attend the district’s Administrators,                  CWT, lesson plans, data chats      BAT scores, formal and
                                                                      NGSSS Science Benchmarks and school-based science                 Curriculum Facilitator,                                             informal assessments
                                                                                                    workshops on the Test Item          Classroom Teachers
                                                                                                    Specifications
  Based on the analysis of student achievement data, and reference to      Anticipated Barrier                  Strategy                     Person or Position                Process Used to Determine          Evaluation Tool
      “Guiding Questions”, identify and define areas in need of                                                                               Responsible for                       Effectiveness of
                improvement for the following group:                                                                                            Monitoring                              Strategy
2. Students achieving above proficiency                                      2.1.                         2.1.                                2.1.                       2.1.                               2.1.
                                                                             Funds unavailable to finance Teachers will plan on-campus Administrators,                   Observations of science lessons    CWT logs
(FCAT Levels 4 and 5) in science                                             off-campus field trips       field trips to bring science alive. Curriculum Facilitator,    held outdoors to conduct
Science Goal #2:                                                                                                                              Classroom Teachers,        experiments or make discoveries,
                                                                                                                                              Instructional Leaders      lesson plans
                                     2011 Current        2012 Expected
                                     Level of            Level of
There will be an increase in the     Performance:*       Performance:*
number of on- and off-campus         Enter numerical     Enter numerical
field trips to promote student       data for current    data for expected
interest in learning science.        level of            level of
                                     performance in      performance in
                                     this box.           this box.




                                                                             2.2.                           2.2.                               2.2.                      2.2.                               2.2.
                                                                             Limited resources available in Teachers will inventory their      Administrators,           CWT, lesson plans                  CWT logs
                                                                             teachers’ science kits to      science kits and share resources   Curriculum Facilitator,
                                                                             conduct science experiments prior to planning and delivering      Classroom Teachers,
                                                                                                            science lessons.                   Instructional Leaders
                                                                             2.3                            2.3                                2.3                       2.3                                2.3

                Professional Development (PD) aligned with Strategies through Professional Learning Community (PLC) or PD Activity
                                                                         Please note that each Strategy does not require a professional development or PLC activity.
     PD Content /Topic                                                                                                Target Dates and Schedules
                                                        PD Facilitator                 PD Participants
     and/or PLC Focus                 Grade                                                                            (e.g. , Early Release) and                                                   Person or Position Responsible for
                                                           and/or            (e.g. , PLC, subject, grade level, or                                       Strategy for Follow-up/Monitoring
                                   Level/Subject                                                                     Schedules (e.g., frequency of                                                             Monitoring
                                                         PLC Leader                     school-wide)
                                                                                                                                meetings)




 April 2011                                                                                                                                                                                                                      22
 Rule 6A-1.099811
 Revised April 29, 2011
2011-2012 School Improvement Plan (SIP)-Form SIP-1


Science Budget (Insert rows as needed)
Include only school-based funded activities/materials and exclude district funded activities/materials.
Evidence-based Program(s)/Materials(s)
Strategy                                               Description of Resources                     Funding Source                            Amount



                                                                                                                                                                             Subtotal:
Technology
Strategy                                               Description of Resources                     Funding Source                            Amount



                                                                                                                                                                             Subtotal:
Professional Development
Strategy                                               Description of Resources                     Funding Source                            Amount



                                                                                                                                                                             Subtotal:
Other
Strategy                                               Description of Resources                     Funding Source                            Amount


                                                                                                                                                                             Subtotal:
                                                                                                                                                                               Total:
End of Science Goals

Writing Goals
* When using percentages, include the number of students the percentage represents next to the percentage (e.g. 70% (35)).
                 WRITING GOALS                                                              Problem-Solving Process to Increase Student Achievement
Based on the analysis of student achievement data, and reference to   Anticipated Barrier          Strategy          Person or Position   Process Used to Determine   Evaluation Tool
    “Guiding Questions”, identify and define areas in need of                                                         Responsible for          Effectiveness of
              improvement for the following group:                                                                      Monitoring                 Strategy

April 2011                                                                                                                                                                          23
Rule 6A-1.099811
Revised April 29, 2011
 2011-2012 School Improvement Plan (SIP)-Form SIP-1
1. Students achieving Adequate Yearly Progress                          1.1.                               1.1.                               1.1.                      1.1.                                1.1.
                                                                        Writing is not implemented         Grade level teachers will adhere   Administrators,           Lesson Plans, CWT, collection and   Scores entered in Virtual
(FCAT Level 4.0 and higher) in writing                                  with fidelity at all grade levels. to the district’s curriculum map   Curriculum Facilitator,   review of writing prompts, data     Counselor, review of
Writing Goal #1:                                                                                           for teaching writing daily.        Classroom Teachers,       chats                               monthly writing prompts
                                                                                                                                              Coach, Instructional
                           2011 Current Level 2012 Expected
                                                                                                         A monthly schoolwide writing         Leaders
                           of Performance:*   Level of
                                                                                                         prompt will be administered to
By June 2012, there will                      Performance:*
                                                                                                         all students at every grade level.
be an increase of 3% in    81%                  84%
the percent of students
scoring FCAT Level 4.0
and higher in writing

                                                                     1.2. Students lack stamina and 1.2. Increase independent and     1.2.Administrators,               1.2.                                1.2.
                                                                     speed to write a complete      guided practice during the daily Curriculum Facilitator,            CWT, Lesson plans, timed            Measure change in each
                                                                     essay.                         writing block.                    Coach, Classroom                  assessments, data chats             student’s writing on the
                                                                                                                                      Teachers, Instructional                                               monthly schoolwide
                                                                                                                                      Leaders                                                               writing prompt
                                                                     1.3.                           1.3.                              1.3.                              1.3.                                1.3.
                                                                     Students lack details when     Teachers need to increase the use Administrators,                   CWT, Lesson plans, data chats       Measure change in each
                                                                     writing                        of visual aids and realia during Curriculum Facilitator,                                                student’s writing on the
                                                                                                    writing instruction               Coach, Classroom                                                      monthly schoolwide
                                                                                                                                      Teachers, Instructional                                               writing prompt
                                                                                                                                      Leaders
 Based on the analysis of student achievement data, and reference to        Anticipated Barrier                  Strategy                  Person or Position               Process Used to Determine               Evaluation Tool
     “Guiding Questions”, identify and define areas in need of                                                                              Responsible for                      Effectiveness of
               improvement for the following group:                                                                                           Monitoring                             Strategy
2A. Student                Writing Goal #2A:                            2A.1.                            2A.1.                                2A.1.                     2A.1.                               2A.1.
                                                                        White:
subgroups not              Ethnicity                                    Black:
making Adequate            (White, Black, Hispanic, Asian,
                                                                        Hispanic:
                           American Indian)
Yearly Progress                                                         Asian:
(AYP) in writing                                                        American Indian:

Writing Goal #2A:
                           2011 Current Level 2012 Expected
                           of Performance:* Level of
Enter narrative for the                       Performance:*
goal in this box.          Enter numerical data Enter numerical data
                           for current level of for expected level of
                           performance in this performance in this
                           box.                 box.
                           White:               White:
                           Black:               Black:
                           Hispanic:            Hispanic:
                           Asian:               Asian:
                           American Indian:     American Indian:
                                                                        2A.2.                            2A.2.                                2A.2.                     2A.2.                               2A.2.
                                                                        2A.3.                            2A.3.                                2A.3.                     2A.3.                               2A.3.

 April 2011                                                                                                                                                                                                                       24
 Rule 6A-1.099811
 Revised April 29, 2011
 2011-2012 School Improvement Plan (SIP)-Form SIP-1
 Based on the analysis of student achievement data, and reference to              Anticipated Barrier           Strategy      Person or Position       Process Used to Determine           Evaluation Tool
     “Guiding Questions”, identify and define areas in need of                                                                 Responsible for              Effectiveness of
             improvement for the following subgroup:                                                                             Monitoring                     Strategy
2B. Student subgroups    Writing Goal #2B:                                2B.1.                         3B.1.              2B.1.                   2B.1.                           2B.1.
not making Adequate      English Language
Yearly Progress (AYP) in Learners (ELL)
writing
Writing Goal #2B:
                                   2011 Current       2012 Expected
                                   Level of           Level of
Enter narrative for the goal in    Performance:*      Performance:*
this box.                          Enter numerical    Enter numerical
                                   data for current   data for
                                   level of           expected level of
                                   performance in     performance in
                                   this box.          this box.

                                                                          2B.2.                         2B.2.              2B.2.                   2B.2.                           2B.2.

                                                                          2B.3.                         2B.3.              2B.3.                   2B.3.                           2B.3.

 Based on the analysis of student achievement data, and reference to              Anticipated Barrier           Strategy      Person or Position       Process Used to Determine           Evaluation Tool
     “Guiding Questions”, identify and define areas in need of                                                                 Responsible for              Effectiveness of
             improvement for the following subgroup:                                                                             Monitoring                     Strategy
2C. Student subgroups Writing Goal #2C:             2C.1.                                               2C.1.              2C.1.                   2C.1.                           2C.1.
not making Adequate      Students with Disabilities
Yearly Progress (AYP) in (SWD)
writing
Writing Goal #2C:
                                   2011 Current       2012 Expected
                                   Level of           Level of
Enter narrative for the goal in    Performance:*      Performance:*
this box.                          Enter numerical    Enter numerical
                                   data for current   data for
                                   level of           expected level of
                                   performance in     performance in
                                   this box.          this box.


                                                                          2C.2.                         2C.2.              2C.2.                   2C.2.                           2C.2.

                                                                          2C.3.                         2C.3.              2C.3.                   2C.3.                           2C.3.




 April 2011                                                                                                                                                                                              25
 Rule 6A-1.099811
 Revised April 29, 2011
 2011-2012 School Improvement Plan (SIP)-Form SIP-1
 Based on the analysis of student achievement data, and reference to                Anticipated Barrier             Strategy                Person or Position         Process Used to Determine            Evaluation Tool
     “Guiding Questions”, identify and define areas in need of                                                                               Responsible for                Effectiveness of
             improvement for the following subgroup:                                                                                           Monitoring                       Strategy
2D. Student subgroups Writing Goal #2D:                                     2D.1.                         2D.1.                         2D.1.                     2D.1.                             2D.1.
not making Adequate      Economically
Yearly Progress (AYP) in Disadvantaged
writing
Writing Goal #2D:
                                    2011 Current        2012 Expected
                                    Level of            Level of
Enter narrative for the goal in     Performance:*       Performance:*
this box.                           Enter numerical     Enter numerical
                                    data for current    data for
                                    level of            expected level of
                                    performance in      performance in
                                    this box.           this box.


                                                                            2D.2.                         2D.2.                         2D.2.                     2D.2.                             2D.2.

                                                                            2D.3.                         2D.3.                         2D.3.                     2D.3.                             2D.3.



                Professional Development (PD) aligned with Strategies through Professional Learning Community (PLC) or PD Activity
                                                                      Please note that each Strategy does not require a professional development or PLC activity.
     PD Content /Topic                                                                                             Target Dates and Schedules
                                                       PD Facilitator               PD Participants
     and/or PLC Focus                Grade                                                                          (e.g. , Early Release) and                                              Person or Position Responsible for
                                                          and/or          (e.g. , PLC, subject, grade level, or                                       Strategy for Follow-up/Monitoring
                                  Level/Subject                                                                   Schedules (e.g., frequency of                                                        Monitoring
                                                        PLC Leader                    school-wide)
                                                                                                                             meetings)




 April 2011                                                                                                                                                                                                               26
 Rule 6A-1.099811
 Revised April 29, 2011
2011-2012 School Improvement Plan (SIP)-Form SIP-1

Writing Budget (Insert rows as needed)
Include only school-based funded activities/materials and exclude district funded activities/materials.
Evidence-based Program(s)/Materials(s)
Strategy                                   Description of Resources                     Funding Source    Amount



                                                                                                                   Subtotal:
Technology
Strategy                                   Description of Resources                     Funding Source    Amount



                                                                                                                   Subtotal:
Professional Development
Strategy                                   Description of Resources                     Funding Source    Amount



                                                                                                                   Subtotal:
Other
Strategy                                   Description of Resources                     Funding Source    Amount


                                                                                                                   Subtotal:
                                                                                                                     Total:
End of Writing Goals




April 2011                                                                                                              27
Rule 6A-1.099811
Revised April 29, 2011
 2011-2012 School Improvement Plan (SIP)-Form SIP-1

 Attendance Goal(s)
 * When using percentages, include the number of students the percentage represents next to the percentage (e.g. 70% (35)).
              ATTENDANCE GOAL(S)                                                                              Problem-solving Process to Increase Attendance
 Based on the analysis of attendance data, and reference to “Guiding             Anticipated Barrier            Strategy            Person or Position          Process Used to Determine          Evaluation Tool
   Questions”, identify and define areas in need of improvement:                                                                     Responsible for                 Effectiveness of
                                                                                                                                       Monitoring                        Strategy
1. Attendance                                                             1.1.                         1.1.                  1.1.                        1.1.                               1.1.
Attendance Goal #1:
                          2011 Current          2012 Expected
                          Attendance Rate:*     Attendance Rate:*
By June 2012, the school’s
daily attendance rate will Enter numerical data Enter numerical data
increase by 3%             for current          for expected
                          attendance rate in    attendance rate in this
                          this box.             box.
                          2011 Current          2012 Expected
                          Number of Students    Number of Students
                          with Excessive        with Excessive
                          Absences              Absences
                           (10 or more)         (10 or more)
                          Enter numerical data Enter numerical data
                          for current number of for expected number of
                          absences in this box absences in this box.
                          2011 Current          2012 Expected
                          Number of             Number of
                          Students with         Students with
                          Excessive Tardies     Excessive Tardies
                          (10 or more)           (10 or more)
                          Enter numerical data Enter numerical data
                          for current number of for expected number of
                          students tardy in this students tardy in this
                          box.                   box.
                                                                          1.2.                         1.2.                  1.2.                        1.2.                               1.2.

                                                                          1.3.                         1.3.                  1.3.                        1.3.                               1.3.




 April 2011                                                                                                                                                                                                      28
 Rule 6A-1.099811
 Revised April 29, 2011
2011-2012 School Improvement Plan (SIP)-Form SIP-1
             Professional Development (PD) aligned with Strategies through Professional Learning Community (PLC) or PD Activity
                                                        Please note that each Strategy does not require a professional development or PLC activity.
   PD Content /Topic                                                                                 Target Dates and Schedules
                                         PD Facilitator               PD Participants
   and/or PLC Focus         Grade                                                                     (e.g. , Early Release) and                                            Person or Position Responsible for
                                            and/or          (e.g. , PLC, subject, grade level, or                                       Strategy for Follow-up/Monitoring
                         Level/Subject                                                              Schedules (e.g., frequency of                                                      Monitoring
                                          PLC Leader                   school-wide)
                                                                                                               meetings)




Attendance Budget (Insert rows as needed)
Include only school-based funded activities/materials and exclude district funded activities /materials.
Evidence-based Program(s)/Materials(s)
Strategy                                     Description of Resources                                  Funding Source                                        Amount



                                                                                                                                                                                                  Subtotal:
Technology
Strategy                                     Description of Resources                                  Funding Source                                        Amount



                                                                                                                                                                                                  Subtotal:
Professional Development
Strategy                                     Description of Resources                                  Funding Source                                        Amount



                                                                                                                                                                                                  Subtotal:
Other
Strategy                                     Description of Resources                                  Funding Source                                        Amount


                                                                                                                                                                                                  Subtotal:
                                                                                                                                                                                                      Total:
End of Attendance Goals

April 2011                                                                                                                                                                                               29
Rule 6A-1.099811
Revised April 29, 2011
 2011-2012 School Improvement Plan (SIP)-Form SIP-1

 Suspension Goal(s)
 * When using percentages, include the number of students the percentage represents next to the percentage (e.g. 70% (35)).
               SUSPENSION GOAL(S)                                                                             Problem-solving Process to Decrease Suspension
 Based on the analysis of suspension data, and reference to “Guiding             Anticipated Barrier            Strategy            Person or Position          Process Used to Determine          Evaluation Tool
   Questions”, identify and define areas in need of improvement:                                                                     Responsible for                 Effectiveness of
                                                                                                                                       Monitoring                        Strategy
1. Suspension                                                             1.1.                         1.1.                  1.1.                        1.1.                               1.1.
Suspension Goal #1:
                          2011 Total Number       2012 Expected
                          of                      Number of
By June 2012, the         In –School              In- School
school’s suspension reate Suspensions             Suspensions
will decrease by 3%       Enter numerical data   Enter numerical data
                          for current number of for expected number
                           in-school suspensions of
                                                 in-school suspensions
                          2011 Total Number       2012 Expected
                          of Students             Number of Students
                          Suspended               Suspended
                          In-School               In -School
                          Enter numerical data    Enter numerical data
                          for current number of   for expected number
                          students suspended      of students suspended
                           in-school              in- school
                          2011 Number of Out- 2012 Expected
                          of-School           Number of
                          Suspensions         Out-of-School
                                              Suspensions
                          Enter numerical data    Enter numerical data
                          for current number of   for expected number
                          students suspended      of students suspended
                          out- of- school         out- of- school
                          2011 Total Number       2012 Expected
                          of Students             Number of Students
                          Suspended               Suspended
                          Out- of- School         Out- of-School
                          Enter numerical data    Enter numerical data
                          for current number of   for expected number
                          students suspended      of students suspended
                           out- of- school        out- of- school
                                                                          1.2.                         1.2.                  1.2.                        1.2.                               1.2.
                                                                          1.3.                         1.3.                  1.3.                        1.3.                               1.3.


 April 2011                                                                                                                                                                                                      30
 Rule 6A-1.099811
 Revised April 29, 2011
2011-2012 School Improvement Plan (SIP)-Form SIP-1

             Professional Development (PD) aligned with Strategies through Professional Learning Community (PLC) or PD Activity
                                                        Please note that each Strategy does not require a professional development or PLC activity.
   PD Content /Topic                                                                                 Target Dates and Schedules
                                         PD Facilitator               PD Participants
   and/or PLC Focus         Grade                                                                     (e.g. , Early Release) and                                            Person or Position Responsible for
                                            and/or          (e.g. , PLC, subject, grade level, or                                       Strategy for Follow-up/Monitoring
                         Level/Subject                                                              Schedules (e.g., frequency of                                                      Monitoring
                                          PLC Leader                    school-wide)
                                                                                                               meetings)




Suspension Budget (Insert rows as needed)
Include only school-based funded activities/materials and exclude district funded activities /materials.
Evidence-based Program(s)/Materials(s)
Strategy                                     Description of Resources                                  Funding Source                                        Amount



                                                                                                                                                                                                  Subtotal:
Technology
Strategy                                     Description of Resources                                  Funding Source                                        Amount



                                                                                                                                                                                                  Subtotal:
Professional Development
Strategy                                     Description of Resources                                  Funding Source                                        Amount



                                                                                                                                                                                                  Subtotal:
Other
Strategy                                     Description of Resources                                  Funding Source                                        Amount


                                                                                                                                                                                                  Subtotal:
                                                                                                                                                                                                    Total:
End of Suspension Goals
April 2011                                                                                                                                                                                               31
Rule 6A-1.099811
Revised April 29, 2011
 2011-2012 School Improvement Plan (SIP)-Form SIP-1

 Dropout Prevention Goal(s)
 Note: Required for High School- F.S., Sec. 1003.53

 * When using percentages, include the number of students the percentage represents next to the percentage (e.g. 70% (35)).
    DROPOUT PREVENTION GOAL(S)                                                                               Problem-solving Process to Dropout Prevention
  Based on the analysis of parent involvement data, and reference to            Anticipated Barrier              Strategy                   Person or Position          Process Used to Determine           Evaluation Tool
      “Guiding Questions”, identify and define areas in need of                                                                              Responsible for                 Effectiveness of
                            improvement:                                                                                                       Monitoring                        Strategy
1. Dropout Prevention                                                    1.1.                         1.1.                           1.1.                        1.1.                                1.1.

Dropout Prevention Goal #1:
*Please refer to the percentage of students who dropped
out during the 2010-2011 school year.

                             2011 Current         2012 Expected
                             Dropout Rate:*       Dropout Rate:*
Not Applicable
                             Enter numerical      Enter numerical data
                             data for dropout     for expected dropout
                             rate in this box.    rate in this box.
                             2011 Current         2012 Expected
                             Graduation Rate:*    Graduation Rate:*
                             Enter numerical      Enter numerical data
                             data for             for expected
                             graduation rate in   graduation rate in
                             this box.            this box.
                                                                         1.2.                         1.2.                           1.2.                        1.2.                                1.2.
                                                                         1.3.                         1.3.                           1.3.                        1.3.                                1.3.


                 Professional Development (PD) aligned with Strategies through Professional Learning Community (PLC) or PD Activity
                                                                   Please note that each Strategy does not require a professional development or PLC activity.
     PD Content /Topic                                                                                          Target Dates and Schedules
                                                    PD Facilitator               PD Participants
     and/or PLC Focus              Grade                                                                         (e.g. , Early Release) and                                                  Person or Position Responsible for
                                                       and/or          (e.g. , PLC, subject, grade level, or                                       Strategy for Follow-up/Monitoring
                                Level/Subject                                                                  Schedules (e.g., frequency of                                                            Monitoring
                                                     PLC Leader                   school-wide)
                                                                                                                          meetings)




 April 2011                                                                                                                                                                                                               32
 Rule 6A-1.099811
 Revised April 29, 2011
2011-2012 School Improvement Plan (SIP)-Form SIP-1

Dropout Prevention Budget (Insert rows as needed)
Include only school-based funded activities/materials and exclude district funded activities /materials.
Evidence-based Program(s)/Materials(s)
Strategy                                   Description of Resources                      Funding Source    Amount



                                                                                                                    Subtotal:
Technology
Strategy                                   Description of Resources                      Funding Source    Amount



                                                                                                                    Subtotal:
Professional Development
Strategy                                   Description of Resources                      Funding Source    Amount



                                                                                                                    Subtotal:
Other
Strategy                                   Description of Resources                      Funding Source    Amount


                                                                                                                    Subtotal:
                                                                                                                      Total:
End of Dropout Prevention Goal(s)




April 2011                                                                                                               33
Rule 6A-1.099811
Revised April 29, 2011
 2011-2012 School Improvement Plan (SIP)-Form SIP-1

 Parent Involvement Goal(s)
 * When using percentages, include the number of students the percentage represents next to the percentage (e.g. 70% (35)).
    PARENT INVOLVEMENT GOAL(S)                                                                                  Problem-solving Process to Parent Involvement
  Based on the analysis of parent involvement data, and reference to               Anticipated Barrier              Strategy                   Person or Position          Process Used to Determine           Evaluation Tool
      “Guiding Questions”, identify and define areas in need of                                                                                 Responsible for                 Effectiveness of
                            improvement:                                                                                                          Monitoring                        Strategy
1. Parent Involvement                                                       1.1.                         1.1.                           1.1.                        1.1.                                1.1.

Parent Involvement Goal #1:
*Please refer to the percentage of parents who
participated in school activities, duplicated or
unduplicated.

                                    2011 Current        2012 Expected
                                    level of Parent     level of Parent
Enter narrative for the goal in     Involvement:*       Involvement:*
this box.                           Enter numerical     Enter numerical
                                    data for current    data for expected
                                    level of parent     level of parent
                                    involvement in      involvement in
                                    this box.           this box.
                                                                            1.2.                         1.2.                           1.2.                        1.2.                                1.2.

                                                                            1.3.                         1.3.                           1.3.                        1.3.                                1.3.



                 Professional Development (PD) aligned with Strategies through Professional Learning Community (PLC) or PD Activity
                                                                      Please note that each Strategy does not require a professional development or PLC activity.
     PD Content /Topic                                                                                             Target Dates and Schedules
                                                       PD Facilitator               PD Participants
     and/or PLC Focus                Grade                                                                          (e.g. , Early Release) and                                                  Person or Position Responsible for
                                                          and/or          (e.g. , PLC, subject, grade level, or                                       Strategy for Follow-up/Monitoring
                                  Level/Subject                                                                   Schedules (e.g., frequency of                                                            Monitoring
                                                        PLC Leader                   school-wide)
                                                                                                                             meetings)




 April 2011                                                                                                                                                                                                                  34
 Rule 6A-1.099811
 Revised April 29, 2011
2011-2012 School Improvement Plan (SIP)-Form SIP-1

Parent Involvement Budget

* Please ensure that items included in the Parental Involvement Policy/Plan (PIP) are outlined in the following budget section.
Include only school-based funded activities/materials and exclude district funded activities /materials.
Evidence-based Program(s)/Materials(s)
Strategy                                   Description of Resources                      Funding Source    Amount



                                                                                                                                  Subtotal:
Technology
Strategy                                   Description of Resources                      Funding Source    Amount



                                                                                                                                  Subtotal:
Professional Development
Strategy                                   Description of Resources                      Funding Source    Amount



                                                                                                                                  Subtotal:
Other
Strategy                                   Description of Resources                      Funding Source    Amount


                                                                                                                                  Subtotal:
                                                                                                                                    Total:
End of Parent Involvement Goal(s)




April 2011                                                                                                                             35
Rule 6A-1.099811
Revised April 29, 2011
 2011-2012 School Improvement Plan (SIP)-Form SIP-1

 Additional Goal(s)

 * When using percentages, include the number of students the percentage represents next to the percentage (e.g. 70% (35)).
               ADDITIONAL GOAL(S)                                                                      Problem-Solving Process to Increase Student Achievement
       Based on the analysis of school data, identify and define                 Anticipated Barrier                Strategy                    Person or Position          Process Used to Determine           Evaluation Tool
                    areas in need of improvement:                                                                                                Responsible for                 Effectiveness of
                                                                                                                                                   Monitoring                        Strategy
1. Additional Goal                                                        1.1.                          1.1.                             1.1.                        1.1.                                1.1.
Additional Goal #1:
                                    2011 Current      2012 Expected
                                    Level :*          Level :*
Enter narrative for the goal in
this box.                           Enter numerical Enter numerical
                                    data for current data for expected
                                    goal in this box. goal in this box.




                                                                          1.2.                          1.2.                             1.2.                        1.2.                                1.2.

                                                                          1.3.                          1.3.                             1.3.                        1.3.                                1.3.




                Professional Development (PD) aligned with Strategies through Professional Learning Community (PLC) or PD Activity
                                                                      Please note that each Strategy does not require a professional development or PLC activity.
     PD Content /Topic                                                                                             Target Dates and Schedules
                                                     PD Facilitator                 PD Participants
     and/or PLC Focus                Grade                                                                          (e.g. , Early Release) and                                                   Person or Position Responsible for
                                                        and/or            (e.g. , PLC, subject, grade level, or                                       Strategy for Follow-up/Monitoring
                                  Level/Subject                                                                   Schedules (e.g., frequency of                                                             Monitoring
                                                      PLC Leader                      school-wide)
                                                                                                                             meetings)




 April 2011                                                                                                                                                                                                                   36
 Rule 6A-1.099811
 Revised April 29, 2011
2011-2012 School Improvement Plan (SIP)-Form SIP-1

Additional Goal(s) Budget (Insert rows as needed)
Include only school-based funded activities/materials and exclude district funded activities /materials.
Evidence-based Program(s)/Materials(s)
Strategy                                   Description of Resources                      Funding Source    Amount



                                                                                                                    Subtotal:
Technology
Strategy                                   Description of Resources                      Funding Source    Amount



                                                                                                                    Subtotal:
Professional Development
Strategy                                   Description of Resources                      Funding Source    Amount



                                                                                                                    Subtotal:
Other
Strategy                                   Description of Resources                      Funding Source    Amount



                                                                                                                    Subtotal:
                                                                                                                       Total:
End of Additional Goal(s)




April 2011                                                                                                               37
Rule 6A-1.099811
Revised April 29, 2011
2011-2012 School Improvement Plan (SIP)-Form SIP-1

FINAL BUDGET (Insert rows as needed)
Please provide the total budget from each section.
Reading Budget
                                                           Total:
Mathematics Budget
                                                           Total:
Science Budget
                                                           Total:
Writing Budget
                                                           Total:
Attendance Budget
                                                           Total:
Suspension Budget
                                                           Total:
Dropout Prevention Budget
                                                           Total:
Parent Involvement Budget
                                                           Total:
Additional Goals
                                                           Total:

                                                     Grand Total:




April 2011                                                   38
Rule 6A-1.099811
Revised April 29, 2011
2011-2012 School Improvement Plan (SIP)-Form SIP-1

Differentiated Accountability
School-level Differentiated Accountability (DA) Compliance
Please choose the school’s DA Status. (To activate the checkbox: 1. double click the desired box; 2.when the menu pops up, select “checked” under “Default
Value” header; 3. Select “OK”, this will place an “x” in the box.)
School Differentiated Accountability Status
   Intervene                 Correct II                      Prevent II                     Correct I               Prevent I             N/A

       Upload a copy of the Differentiated Accountability Checklist in the designated upload link on the “Upload” page

School Advisory Council
School Advisory Council (SAC) Membership Compliance
The majority of the SAC members are not employed by the school district. The SAC is composed of the principal and an appropriately balanced number of
teachers, education support employees, students (for middle and high school only), parents, and other business and community citizens who are representative of
the ethnic, racial, and economic community served by the school. Please verify the statement above by selecting “Yes” or “No” below.

         Yes                                                                                                No

If No, describe measures being taken to comply with SAC requirement.




Describe the activities of the School Advisory Council for the upcoming year.




Describe projected use of SAC funds.                                                                                                  Amount




April 2011                                                                                                                                                   39
Rule 6A-1.099811
Revised April 29, 2011

				
DOCUMENT INFO
Categories:
Tags:
Stats:
views:6
posted:12/6/2011
language:English
pages:39