Embed
Email

bbg conference minutes 1106292

Document Sample

Shared by: Nuhman Paramban
Categories
Tags
Stats
views:
0
posted:
12/5/2011
language:
English
pages:
9
Birmingham Bursars’ Group

th

Tuesday 29 June 2011 at Ramada Hotel, Sutton Coldfield



Minute ref: Present: Action

10/046 Mike Jameson (MJ) Chairman

Matthew Wheeler Vice Chair

Sarah Westwood Vice Chair

Committee members

Guests and Speakers as per agenda

Suzanne Edmonston Clerk



ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING



10/047 Apologies: not read out

A total of 70 members had indicated that they would not be able

to attend. A further 20 members had not indicated their

intentions. Attendance 175.



10/048 Chairman’s Report

Meeting opened at 9.30 am.

Full report available on BBG website.

MJ was particularly pleased to welcomed members to the group’s

Summer Conference at the Ramada Hotel, with a warm welcome in

particular to all new members. Current membership in the new

membership year is already in excess of 250.

This was the group’s first Annual General Meeting and would be

Mike’s last as Chairman. He was proud to have been Chairman

throughout the last 12 years, but was now standing down to make

way for younger members to take up the baton and continue to

move the group forward. A number of the current Committee

were also retiring from group office and SE was also giving up her

role as Administrator but Mike was pleased to see that a number

of members had offered to join the Committee and recruitment

of a new Administrator was now underway.

Mike would continue to be associated with the group as Chief

Officer for at least the next 12 months and would provide

support to the new Chairs and help settle the new Administrator

into post.

Acceptance of the Chairman’s Report was proposed by Shirley

Williams and seconded by Roger Groom.

Members voted unanimously in favour.

10/049 Treasurer’s Report

Full report available on BBG website.

The group has come a long way since it began in 1999 and the

income profile has changed dramatically over time. Particularly

since the set-up of the website and the graphs included in the

report demonstrate this with sponsorship income now over 65% of

group annual revenue.

The committee feel there is a need to strike a balance between

increasing numbers of members to provide a reasonable level of

membership fees and the increasing need for sponsorship and

exhibitor income in order to provide venues of adequate size for

the meetings.

Happy to report that the group ended 2010/11 in a very positive

position.

Thanks to Jo Tyler for auditing the accounts.

Acceptance of the Treasurer’s Report was proposed by Lynn

Barnett and seconded by Roger Groom.

Members voted unanimously in favour.



10/050 Constitution matters

The group was now entering into contracts with large numbers of

suppliers, exhibitors etc. and there was a need to look at the

status of the group in order to protect the members for the

future as the group moves forward.

The suggestion was to make the group a company limited by

guarantee.

It was agreed that Matthew Wheeler should follow-up this option Matthew

and report back at the next meeting. Wheeler



10/051 Election of new Committee Members

Six members of the current committee have now resigned and

seven members have volunteered to join the committee.

Mike explained that the current constitution in relation to the

committee allows for a minimum of 10 committee members, 3 of

whom are in the Primary or Special School sector. These 7

members had already posted their profiles on the BBG website.

Sue Thomas proposed that all 7 volunteers be voted onto the

Committee. This was seconded by Pat Hardware and agreed

unanimously by all members.







2

10/052 AOB

Finally gifts were presented to all outgoing Committee Members

who had been in post since the group’s formation and to the

Administrator, in recognition of all their hard work and support.



SUMMER CONFERENCE



10/053 MJ welcomed everyone to the group’s Summer Conference.

Once again the Ramada Hotel was providing a superb venue and

the full agenda provided a number of regular speakers as well as

those providing a focus on fundraising and other topical issues.

Members were encouraged to visit the wide range of exhibitors

present at the meeting. They had all paid a fee to support the

costs of the day and the group was very grateful for the large

number of exhibitors who continue to request space at group

meetings.

A number of exhibitors held prize draws at lunchtime and SG

World had put three money-off coupons in packs placed on

delegate seats.



10/054 Minutes

Minutes of the meeting 15/02/2011 were agreed as a correct

record.



10/055 Committee report

No committee meetings had been held since the February group

meeting.



10/056 Consultation re: exhibitors and sponsorship

A total of 77 responses had been received for the online

consultation. It was a disappointing response but member

consultations would continue to be held online as the best way of

contacting all members in a short time, particularly between

meetings.

Results:

 94.5% agreed that sponsorship and exhibitor finance

was a benefit to the group

 93.5% agreed that exhibitors should not be allowed

agenda time, with the exception of the meeting sponsor

 45% (the highest figure) agreed that the preferred

number of exhibitors at each meeting should be limited



3

to 9 – 12.

 83% agreed that sponsors of each meeting should be

allowed a 5 or 10 minute presentation slot, at a cost of

£500.

 A big majority of responses agreed that guests should

continue to pay a £25 visitor fee

 81% wanted this facility restricted to guests from an

existing member school

 86% wanted to accept guests from another school, who

might subsequently join the group

 60% agreed that guests could include prospective

sponsors or exhibitors who wanted to look at the group

before booking a place. This should not include current

sponsors or exhibitors who had already attended a

meeting.

 91% wanted ‘members only’ forums where sensitive

issues could be discussed, which would not be visible to

sponsors

 The majority of members wanted the ‘email all’ facility

to be withdrawn from sponsors – this was now effective

and sponsors would need to use the sponsors

noticeboards

 97% felt to current level of sponsorship and revenue

generated was about right. As a result, website

sponsorship to any additional Educational Recruitment

companies was now closed. However the committee

continued to be mindful of the need to strike a balance

as sponsorship provided a great deal of income for the

group.



10/057 Support Staff Awards/NASBM update (Matthew Wheeler)

Nominations for this year’s awards are now closed. There were a

good number of nominations across all categories and judging had

now started. The awards ceremony would be held in October.

The 2010 winners (including our very own Jane Taylor) had been

invited to visit Downing Street as part of their award. They had

hoped to be able to meet a member of government. Unfortunately

this had not been possible on the day, but Jane reported that

they had a fantastic visit and hoped to be able to post a photo to

the website soon.



The NASBM now has a regional system with 1 trustee for each

4

region. Matthew Wheeler is now the NASBM trustee for the

West Midlands region and 5 regions have now returned new

trustees to the committee. The NASBM were aware that they

had lagged behind in the past and not responded as quickly as

expected to member issues. However Matthew was pleased to

report that they were now listening to members more closely and

addressing their concerns. They would soon be providing a number

of good quality training courses and members should not be afraid

to ask their schools to support their applications, including

financially.

There would be a further Trustees meeting in July and it was

hoped this would finally enable NASBM to achieve Chartered

status.

Members were encouraged to post their comments, good or Matthew

otherwise, about NASBM on member’s forums and Matthew would Wheeler

ensure they were fed through to the organization.



10/058 Training update

Members were reminded that BBG did not endorse any particular

course or training provider, but that training came in various

guises including the termly meetings where member were able to

network, collect information and share ideas. Members were also

asked to let Jane Taylor know if they had any specific training

needs or requests. Topics suggested recently included:

 Benchmarking

 Child protection

 Data protection

 Line management

 Safeguarding

 Accountancy issues for academies

 HR issues

It was hoped to begin to address these areas asap. Jane

Jean Palmer also thanked all those members who had helped her Taylor

complete her dissertation. She was pleased to report that she had Members/

now completed her degree and been awarded 2.1. Congratulations Training

to her from all members. Commitee



10/059 Future dates/venues

The committee is still looking at various venues around the city

for future meetings but no dates or venues have yet been

finalized. Members had agreed to spread the meeting locations

out in order to help with travel times. Although the Tally Ho had

5

been widely supported, it was no longer possible to accommodate

the group with breakout sessions etc. Further info would be

posted on website asap.

However, if anyone has any further suggestions for a venue,

please pass them to Mike. New

Meeting Committee members were asked to meet at 2.15 pm Commitee

today, to set dates for a further committee meeting.



10/060 AOB

Pam Berridge (Bartley Green) had retired due to ill health. A card

was available for members to sign wishing her well.

The Property Working Group would be meeting again next month

and would be an agenda item at the next group meeting. Gail Hall

Some members had volunteered to join a group looking at

SAP/finance/ICT links. They had not yet met but a memo from

Link2ICT says they will be notified of a date for the meeting

soon.

Anne Bayliss (Wyndcliffe) asked who was leading on SAP – Andy

Titchener.



10/061 The Future of School Funding – Dugald Sandeman

Full presentation available on website.

The group was very pleased to welcome Dugald once again. He

explained that BBG was the largest regional group in the UK and

he was very pleased to be asked to speak again. However the news

he was able to pass on at this time was limited as future funding

formulas were not yet finalized and another funding consultation

would be coming out to schools shortly.

In response to member questions:

 No decision has yet been made re: 3 yr settlements. Major

reforms are still being finalized and no-one would want the

decisions to be rushed.

 Not yet decided if MFG will continue but he would be

surprised if the current level was radically changed.

 Schools must continue to look carefully at staffing. When

senior staff leave they should not automatically be replaced

with like for like. Pupil/staff contact ratios may need

adjusting or reductions in size of SLT may be needed, to

balance the books.

 The introduction of rigorous Performance Management

schemes will enable schools to address the expectation of

gratuitous salary increments.

6

 The current pay freeze is helping school budgets, but this

may be lifted in 2012/13.

 This year’s Pupil Premium should not be used as a budget

buffer. There was no formal reporting procedure on the use

of this funding, this year. However schools may need to

justify its use to parents and OFSTED may look at how it

was used.

 Funding of academies will be subject to reform to address

anomalies. As the number of academies increase, so the

need for this reform will be emphasized.

 Dugald would take a specific query back from Manor Park

School re: full-time Nursery funding.



10/062 DRB – Meeting Sponsors

Full presentation available on website .

Paul Guest thanked the group for the opportunity of being the

main sponsor at the meeting.

They offer a wide range of services from Project Management of

building projects to Facilities Management of cleaning and grounds

maintenance.

All staff are fully skilled, CRB checked and all work is covered by

public liability insurance. They can also manage TUPE transfer of

existing staff.

The relief caretaking service can be tailored to suit individual

needs – full service, open/close only or emergency cover.



10/063 Finance update – Martyn Scott (The Scott Report)

Full presentation available on website.

The annual return detailing school balances should be completed

as normal for 2010/11. However this will only need presentation to

governors. No formal return to LA is required for this year. In

addition the claw-back rules for 2010/11 have also been

suspended. This will be reviewed for 2011/12.

In response to members questions:

 One school with a large carry forward due to responsibility

for various budgets (i.e. collegiate) has been asked to

attend a meeting re: their carry forward. This was probably

to supply additional information with regard to the sums

involved.

 There is no limit to level of carry forward for Standards

Fund, but the time limits still apply.

 The LA has imposed claw-back on carry forward balances on

7

two occasions in the past. The resulting funds were

referred to DSG and Schools Forum to decide how they

were re-distributed.

 Ebriefing to be issued re: CFR recording for networks

 Problems with Voyager system mean it is not possible to

allocate separate cost code for schools within networks in

order to assist with individual accounting. Martyn to follow-

up.

The voyager income system currently held £635,000 of

unidentified income. Schools would lose this money if it was not

identified soon. Schools could email Martyn with any problems.

Schools should also order giro-books in good time. Current

delivery delay is 2-6 weeks.



10/064 Eleanor Brazil

Full presentation available on website.

Has been in post as Strategic Director Birmingham since October

2010.

City has been subject to improvement notice re: protection of

children and now has a 3 yr plan to address this issue.

There is concern about how the criteria for identifying schools to

become academies.

In response to questions from members:

 Schools were reassured that adequate and affordable

provision would be available across the city for those

children with additional needs

 LA in dialogue with schools staff to develop good working

relationships

 LA is aware of the problems for older disabled children and

is looking at the transition from school to adult provision.



10/065 PDR for Support Staff – Sam Hulson & Richard Billingham

Full presentation available on website.

In response to questions from members:

 Although it was not possible to set a bar within a grade to

limit progress up the grade, this should now be effected by

setting ‘challenging’ objectives. (Members very concerned

how challenging objectives could be implemented

consistently for T/A’s in similar positions in a school)

 LA currently in consultation with unions and the Legal Dept,

with regard to this years’ award, which would, once the new

system is agreed and implemented, be backdated to April

8

2011, if the staff member then qualifies for an award. It is

likely that agreement to sign-up to the new performance

management system will allow this year’s award to be made

where applicable.

 Staff who are not at maximum point on their grade would

have 3 meetings per year. 1 to set this year’s objectives

followed by an interim and final review. Detailed scenarios

will be included in the final scheme guidance. The

anticipated timescale is Set objectives

September/October, review as above and agree, or

otherwise, that they have been met the following

September. If agreed the award will be backdated to April

of the previous year. There may be an agreement to reduce

the time frame to 4/5 months.

 Schools which already have a performance management

system in place can continue to use it in the meantime.

However, it cannot be used to support incremental awards.

 There is no ‘equal pay challenge’ if some staff are set

challenging objectives and other set standard objectives.

The comparison for equal pay is with the spinal column span

(whole grade) not individual points within the grade. It is

acceptable to base these decisions either on the needs of

the school and/or budget availability.

 Training will be provided in September/October to Heads/

Business Managers and Bursars. This will include guidance

about current increments and the transitional to the new

system.

10/066 For the afternoon session members could chose between two

break-out workshops:

Interview Techniques with Marc Ashford and Tracy Newman from

Smile Education or

Publicity Strategies for Schools with Matthew Wheeler from

Hodge Hill School

10/067 Fundraising for Schools – Mike Gaffney

Full presentation on the Website including contact details.

10/068 There being no further business Sarah Westwood closed the

meeting and thanked everyone for attending.

The meeting closed at 4.30 pm.

10/069 Future Meetings

No dates as yet available



9



Related docs
Other docs by Nuhman Paramba...
answering 10330
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
exp-trading-algorithms
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Dear Patients Merged
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Day1Radiologist
Views: 2  |  Downloads: 0
California_and_Hawaii_1999
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Tapeworm_Infection
Views: 1  |  Downloads: 0
Serial Powering Logbook
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
09_57_32_faisal ksa _2_
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
University_Canada2011
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
By registering with docstoc.com you agree to our
privacy policy

You are almost ready to download!

You are almost ready to download!