Get documents about "NETWARCOM Transformation
Document Sample
NETWARCOM
Transformation
Roadmap to the future…
AFCEA Presentation
14 MAR 06
Mr. Mark Honecker
Deputy Commander,
Naval Network Warfare Command
2
The United States Navy Today
AS OF 13 MAR 06
JC. STENNIS (CVN)
OPS
MOUNT WHITNEY (LCC)
G. WASHINGTON (CVN)
OPS
SAIPAN (LHA)
BLUE RIDGE (LCC)
OPS
A. LINCOLN (CVN) ENTERPRISE (CVN)
BOXER (LHD) OPS
PELELIU (LHA)
OPS RONALD REAGAN (CVN)
OPS
NASSAU (LHA)
OPS
ESSEX (LHD)
OPS
USNORTHCOM USSOUTHCOM USEUCOM USPACOM USPACOM/ USCENTCOM
2ND FLT COMUSNAVSO 6TH FLT 7TH FLT USNORTHCOM 5TH FLT
3RD FLT
32 SHIPS 3 SHIPS 11 SHIPS 27 SHIPS 28 SHIPS 21 SHIPS
281 SHIPS
ACTIVE COMPONENT (AC) END STRENGTH: 356,429
RESERVE COMPONENT (RC) END STRENGTH: 72,666
DON CIVILIAN EMPLOYEE (APPR) END STRENGTH: 175,448
UNDERWAY: 118 (42%) 5 CV/CVN, 5 LHA/LHD
DEPLOYED: 94 (33%) 3 CSG, 3 ESG TOTAL PERSONNEL: 36,653
3
Navy’s FY06 Corporate Profile
FY05 Expenditures: $108.8B Key Facts
FY06 TOA: $111.2B
FY07 Projected: $109.3B
• Rank #7 on Fortune 100 (#11 on Global 500)
• Operations/maintenance: $33.8B • Run >8K applications on our networks
• Military Personnel: 27.1B • Manage an inventory of 597K items
• Investment valued at $61B
- Platforms/weapons 23.8B • Consume 32M BBL fuel annually
- Facilities 1.4B • Own the largest fleet and the 4th
- R&D 17.9B largest air force in the world
• Domain owners - 281 ships
- Aviation 34.4B - 3834 aircraft
- Surface 21.0B • Fly 4.2% of the annual hours flown in U.S.
- Submarine 12.3B
People Foreign Military Sales
• Total workforce ~900,000 •Total annual sales: $3.5B
- Active military: 352,700
- Reserve military: 73,100 • Countries supported: 159
- Civilians: ~170,031
- Contractors: ~200,000
• Deployed personnel 42,185
4
CFFC's Force Providers
Fleet Forces Command
Force Provider
Enterprises
Naval Expeditionary Naval Undersea
Enterprise Enterprise
Naval Aviation Naval Surface
Enterprise Naval Network Enterprise
Enterprise
NETWARCOM
FFC Support Other Support
OPNAV Staff
Enterprises CNI
NAVRES NCTAMS GNOSC NCDOC NIOCs NPGS/CID RESFOR CNP
15/18
NETC
Navy IG
5
NETWARCOM Role
Navy’s Type Commander for “Hybrid” Operational Type
Man, Train, and Equip Commander
– Operate, Maintain, and
The network is the platform Defend
– Network Ops
Global C4I – Computer Network Attack
– Computer Network Defense
Naval Networks – Computer Network Exploitation
– IO
Information Operations
– Space
FORCEnet – Functional Component
Commander to
USSTRATCOM
Lead FORCEnet Enterprise
6
NETWARCOM FY06 Command Profile
NETWARCOM Command Profile Key NETWARCOM Facts
FY05 Expenditures: $450M
FY06 TOA: $630M • # Users supported on our networks: ~761K
FY07 Projection: $612M • Operate Networks in ~16 countries
• # desktops NMCI Integrated: > 360K
• Information Operations $57M • # bases where NMCI operates: >300
• Space 33M • > 3 terabytes of data exfiltrated from DoD in
• Networks 367M past 2 yrs (equivalent to contents of 3 mid-
• Intel 129M sized city libraries
• Counter-drug 44M • > 90K Internet/NIPRNET probes per hr
• > 60K viruses/worms have infiltrated the
NETWARCOM People internet since CY01
• 2434 Network Incidents in CY05 (124 were
• Total workforce ~15,000 root access breaches)
- Active military 4,018 • Every 18 months new IT emerges
- Reserve military 7,351 • Navy IT “refresh rate” every > 4 years
- Civilians 2,001 • # of DOD Space Missions Areas: 4
- Contractors ~1,442 • NNFE FY07 projection: $6.1B
7
NETWARCOM
Vision & Purpose
Vision: To be the authority in superior information
capabilities that drive joint and coalition network
centric operations.
Purpose: To ensure our leaders have the systems,
processes, and knowledge required to make rapid and
well-informed effects-based decisions, to degrade our
enemies’ decision capabilities, and to influence the
decision-making of others in all phases of operations.
NETWARCOM – Virtual Weapons ... Real Results
NETWARCOM
8
Focus
Operate the Navy component of the Global Information Grid (GIG)
as a weapons system
Result: Determine and meet negotiated service level agreements with maritime
headquarters and other supported commands (both afloat and ashore).
Restriction(s): Do not violate IA and interoperability standards
Extend Use of Information Operations (IO) Capabilities
Result: Increase the breadth and depth of Commanders’ use of IO as reflected in
incorporation of IO in deliberate and crisis action planning, exercises, and current
operations as measured by maturity model.
Restriction(s): Ensure acceptable levels of support to National missions are
maintained.
Assure Naval equities in space
Result: Increase Naval commanders’ warfighting capabilities through the use of
cumulative space effects in maritime operations as measured by maturity model.
Restriction(s): Ensure no unnecessary redundancy of effort between other DoD
Space communities and NETWARCOM’s role as the Naval operational agent for
Space.
9
NETWARCOM
Focus con’t
Develop the workforce to achieve information superiority
Result: Sustain, attract and develop a qualified/certified, diverse workforce to meet
mission requirements as measured by ratings from recipient organizations, achieving
ratings of “meet requirements” or “exceed requirements” for personnel within
information domain.
Restriction(s): Cannot receive rating of “fails to meet requirements” from any customer.
Ensure billets are coded/characterized correctly to meet actual requirements.
Implement FORCEnet
Result: Deliver and attain Navy and Joint acceptance of the FORCEnet Implementation
and Governance Plan that integrates concepts, capabilities, architecture, and
assessments
Restriction(s): Compliant with JCIDS (DOTMLPF) process. Informed by Naval, Joint,
and Coalition reqmts.
Shape development and operation of Maritime Operations Center
Result: Drive development of and achieve acceptance from Navy and Joint
stakeholders on CONOPS, organization, processes, technology and systems for the
maritime operations centers.
Restriction(s): Maintain synchronization with Joint C2 initiatives, directives and policies.
Ensure CONOPS includes NETWARCOM’s roles as a supported.supporting
commander.
10
Navy Networks
Critical Actions
Lock-down legacy networks
Collapse legacy enclaves
- Accelerate cut-over to centrally managed enclaves
NMCI; ONE-NET
- Eliminate DISA-direct connections
Recover DISA connectivity charges; reclaim bandwidth
Executing Cyber-warfighting Campaign
- JOPES based approach
- CYBER Condition ZEBRA
HREN, TBEN, NOLA & RITSC SW lock-downs complete
PAC NW, Hawaii and D.C. to follow
NETWARCOM OPORD directs that ALL applications must
be Security Technical Implementation Guide (STIG) and
Unclassified Trusted Network – Protect (UTN-P) compliant
Cyberwarriors - at general quarters everyday
11
Effects Based IO
Navy Cyber Attack Team 06
JFMCC/COCOM Reqmts
Target Development
M&S
Access Development
Capability Development
COA Development
OIF 2005 OP Training & Cert
Approval
JCS/RCC Managed Execution
SAP/STO Effects Based
OIF 2003
Measurable
OSD Managed Access Driven
Not Measurable
Access Driven
Driving the Process
Space Effects
12
METOC
Increased Operational
SATCOM GPS NATIONAL
Space Expertise
What is the Navy's true stake in
Ballistic Missile
Defense
SENSORS
Improved Combat
AF do it
space? Why not let the Effectivenessall for
us? Improved Space-Related
Requirements
JOC
DISN JIC Fleet Validated Space
JFACC
NOC
Processes
… Integrating space capabilities throughout the naval forces
… Shaping joint deliberations to assure combat effectiveness
13
FORCEnet is…
Revolutionized Naval “command & control”**
FORCEnet will transform
- Organizations FORCEnet
- Processes
Warfighting Business
- Doctrine
- Technology
- Investments Sea Sea Sea Sea Sea
Reduces the Navy Networks from Strike Base Shield Enterprise Warrior
hundreds to 3 seamless networks:
- IT-21
- NMCI Fn … turning information into effects
- ONE-NET
- Navy Component of the GIG
**CNO & CMC – FORCEnet Functional Concept
14
MHQ w/MOC – Globally-Netted
Fundamentals
COCOMS
Networks are a MHQ
weapons system
Doctrine in development 2nd 3rd 5th 6th
C2F 7th
Flt Flt Flt Flt Flt
for core MHQ processes Icon
and activities INTEL
- Reachback IO
- Information to the extremities COP/MDA
- C2 approach
COALITION
Horizontal and vertical
COALITION COALITION COALITION COALITION
interoperability
Standardized core processes and systems
versus theater unique
15
The New NETWARCOM
Providing the full spectrum of
NETWORK Centric Operations
and Warfare…
- Enhancing our leaders’ decision cycle
- Controlling our enemy’s
- Influencing many
Winning the fight … before it starts
16
Backup
17
NETWARCOM Organization
FFC N6
Commander
NETWARCOM
00
Deputy Vice Reserve Vice
Commander Commander Commander
Flag Special
Assistants 02 01 R01
Chief of Staff
Special
03 Assistants
Human Operations Info Ops
Capital Logistics Enterprise Enterprise Requirements Innovation & ADDU FROM Directorate
Management Management Management Architecture Experimentation NNSOC ADDU FROM
OPNAV N3 IO
N1 N4 N5 N6 N8 N9 N3 IOD
NCO Ex Dir
NCTSI
COMNNSOC NIOCs
Bahrain Colorado
Maryland Hawaii
NMSC NCTAMS NMCI Sugar Grove Misawa
LANT Menwith Hill Texas
GNOC
PAC Yokosuka Georgia
NAVSOC Suitland Pensacola
DCMS Norfolk San Diego
NCDOC FSSC Whidbey Island
