Re: Charter
Re: Charter
Source: http://sci.tech−archive.net/Archive/sci.archaeology/2005−12/msg00553.html
• From: Eric Stevens
• Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 10:31:05 +1300
On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 00:50:55 GMT, Seppo Renfors
wrote:
>
>
>Tom McDonald wrote:
>>
>> Seppo Renfors wrote:
>> >
>> > JMB wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> >>The Moderated charter has been posted on the moderated group. Message ID
>> >>25ptp1dc7s8flo7ikofae6h0f5mdf0fqjh@xxxxxxx
>> >>with links at the end.
>> >
>> >
>> > Oh yeah? So he finally went and posted it (no he didn't, see later)
>> > after my reply on the issue to dopey Deitiker, eh!! So why is he
>> > keeping it a secret for, hmmm. Why hide it away on a dead hole for,
>> > when the debate about it is HERE?
>>
>> The charter is posted where it should be posted.
>>
>> The charter is what it is. It is not going to change. If you do
>> not like the charter, do not attempt to post to the ng. Although,
>> that said, were you to post an on−topic article in s.a.m. that
>> followed the charter, your article would almost certainly be
>> approved and posted.
>
>
>Why did you have to secretly EDIT and alter my message − did it
>embarrass you or something, hmmmm? Therefor it isn't worth shit
>irrespective of where it is posted − it is stated to NOT being the one
>that passed the vote!
>
>[restore text]
>The first URL is not fully accessible − it requires logging in − in
Re: Charter 1
Re: Charter
>any event it isn't of much value. The second is a document by Douggie
>personally once more − in any event it isn't of much value either as
>it is NOT the CFV that got passed. The third is NOT a pointer to any
>web site − but to a post in sci.anthropology archived by Google −
>something able to be created in hindsight!
>
>Well it would be good IF one could have confidence in it. Remember who
>posted it! − there IS NO URL to the ORIGINAL CFV − the relevant
>document.
Of course there is no URL to the original document! News groups were
created before the WWW ever existed.
However, Deja News (now Google Groups) has copies of the original
which was promulgated the news group news.newgroups.announce. You will
find them in http://tinyurl.com/8yrm3 Alternatively, you could try
hunting down the original articles in news.newgroups.announce
yourself. They should all be there.
>
>Oh and please note what Douggie has said:
>
>"Revised 13 December 2005"
>
>REVISE − reconsider and alter (something) in the light of further
>evidence; re−examine and make alterations to (written or printed
>matter): − OED
>
>So he has unashamedly EDITED IT to suit his dictatorial, censoring
>agendas!! He say's so himself! Pffffftttttt........
>
>THAT is why the URL is required to a source HE (or his cronies) cannot
>edit!!
>[end restore]
>
>How can people who are DISHONEST to their rotten core be trusted when
>they provide a "copy" THEY have no doubt edited to suit their own
>prejudices − eg like Tom (the empty of honesty) McDonald did with MY
>message!
Eric Stevens
.
• Follow−Ups:
♦ Re: Charter
◊ From: Seppo Renfors
♦ Re: Charter
Re: Charter 2
Re: Charter
◊ From: GarryDenke
• References:
♦ Charter
◊ From: Philip Deitiker
♦ Re: Charter
◊ From: Seppo Renfors
♦ Re: Charter
◊ From: Tedd Jacobs
♦ Re: Charter
◊ From: Tom McDonald
♦ Re: Charter
◊ From: Seppo Renfors
♦ Re: Charter
◊ From: JMB
♦ Re: Charter
◊ From: Seppo Renfors
♦ Re: Charter
◊ From: JMB
♦ Re: Charter
◊ From: Seppo Renfors
♦ Re: Charter
◊ From: Tom McDonald
♦ Re: Charter
◊ From: Seppo Renfors
• Prev by Date: Where did the copper to Bronze Age tools come from
• Next by Date: Re: Vinland Map Like Forgery: Fake pottery buries theory of early start for
Christianity
• Previous by thread: Re: Charter
• Next by thread: Re: Charter
• Index(es):
♦ Date
♦ Thread
Re: Charter 3