Re Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website by TaylorRandle

VIEWS: 5 PAGES: 4

									                              Re: "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"

Re: "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"

Source: http://sci.tech−archive.net/Archive/sci.physics/2009−02/msg01444.html



      • From: gabydewilde <gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx>
      • Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 09:40:17 −0800 (PST)

On Feb 23, 3:52 pm, "Soif" <s...@xxxxxxx> wrote:

       "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"

       (See also our sister website reticsessays.com)

       The Einsteinhoax Website was setup to counter an intellectual "fast
       shuffle" which used Dr. Einstein's Special Relativity (which is easily seen
       to be a mathematical copy of the earlier Lorentz Transformations Aether
       Theory) to propagate the idea that our physical reality was too subtle to be
       understood by mortal men and could only be dealt with using sophisticated
       mathematics. This ploy served the academic community very well. The quote
       was made that Dr. Einstein's principle contribution was not Special
       Relativity but rather the showing that mathematics could used to make
       advances in the physical sciences and "it was no longer necessary to wait
       for "the few great minds that arise in each century" to make progress. Since
       the availability of such intelligent men could not be expanded but
       mathematics can be taught to anyone, the approach not only made the physical
       sciences more mysterious, but allowed an unlimited expansion of the
       contributing scientific community.

       The phenomena associated with both Special and General Relativity seem,
       to a large degree, to be incomprehensible and the conclusions contradictory.
       There is a simple reason for this. The explanations which are provided lead
       the mind to recognize inherent contradictions which are not apparent in the
       mathematics. Since the contradictions do not appear in the mathematics it
       was considered obvious that did not exist! These contradictions have led to
       the continuous confusion appearing in the Newsgroups and elsewhere. The
       reality is that, when an expert(s) cannot explain his(their) knowledge to an
       intelligent layman (laymen), there can only be one explanation. The
       expert(s) do not actually understand their subject matter. IT IS NOT BECAUSE
       OF THE LIMITATIONS OF THE LAYMEN.

       "The Einstein Hoax"

       http://einsteinhoax.com/hoax.htmwas written to provide an
       understanding of our physical reality which is in agreement with all known
       physical observations and mathematical logic and , most importantly, pass
       the "intelligent layman" test. The chapters of "The Einstein Hoax" are


Re: "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"                                            1
                              Re: "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
       listed below:

       Chapter Titles

       1. − Introduction
       2. − Historical Background
       3. − The Nature of the Einstein Hoax
       4. − Does the Aether Exist?
       5. − The Resurrection of Absolute Velocity by Quantum Experiments
       6. − The Nature of Reality
       7. − Applying the Lorentz Transformations Properly
       8. − Generating the Gravity Transformations
       9. − Dr. Einstein's Error and the Introduction of Curved Space
       10. − Gravitational Contraction and Collapse
       11. − Gravitational Collapse and the Creation of a Universe
       12. − The Space Time Continuum
       13. − The Nature of Particles
       14. − Adding Quantum Effects to Our Understanding
       15. − Changing the Paradigms
       16. − What Can We Conclude?</h4>

       There are 57,000 words and 53 illustrations.</h4>

       "Gravity"

       A correct derivation of gravitational theory described is provided in
       "Gravity" athttp://einsteinhoax.com/gravity/htm. The test for its validity
       is whether it agrees with both the results of observation and the results of
       theoretical derivations. The material presented passes this test. It agrees
       with the observations which are alleged to have verified General Relativity.
       The Sun's gravitational field is about 5 orders of magnitude too weak to
       reveal the difference between the two approaches. Observations of strong
       gravitational fields, such as around neutron stars, cannot differentiate
       between the theories without a close up observations of orbital parameters.
       Such a verification must await the availability of Star Trek's Warp Drive..

       The advantage of the revised approach is that, among other results, it
       reveals the source of gravitational energy (force), allows the total energy
       of the Universe to remain constant over time, eliminates the idea of a
       singularities (no black holes), and explains the creation of Universes. The
       topics covered are:

       Chapter Titles

       1: − Introduction
       2: − Laying the Groundwork
       3: − Evaluating the Gravitational Conversion Factors
       4: − Comparison with the "Real World"
       5: − The Complete Gravitational Field

       There are 50,000 words and 22 diagrams.</h4>

Re: "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"                                            2
                              Re: "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"


       "Corrections to Errors in Special Relativity"

       This text is provided to correct residual errors in Special Relativity
       by using the transformations provided by Special Relativity to eliminate the
       rather foolish "Right Angle Lever Paradox" and to reveal the nature of
       inertial mass.

       Summary of "Corrections to Special Relativity"

       1.− Introduction
       2.− Groundwork of the Discussion
       3.− A Comparison of the Velocity Difference Between Velocity
       Reference Frames B and C as Observed in Reference Frame B
       and as Observed in Reference Frame A
       4:− Determination of the Lorentz Transformation for Incremental Mass
       and
       for Force Between Reference Frames Having Relative Velocity
       References
       5:− The Balance of Moments Applied to a Right Angled Lever in Velocity
       Reference Frame B Moving with Velocity 'V' with Respect to
       Velocity
       Reference Frame A as Observed in Reverence Frames A and B
       6:− The Conventional Lorentz Transformation for Transverse Force as
       Related to the Right Angle Lever Thought Experiment
       7:− The Lorentz Transformation for Parallel and Transverse Force as
       Related to a Compressed Spring Thought Experiment

       The source material for this posting may be found
       inhttp://einsteinhoax.com/hoax.htm(1997);http://einsteinhoax.com/gravity.htm
       (1987); andhttp://einsteinhoax.com/relcor.htm(1997). EVERYTHING WHICH WE
       ACCEPT AS TRUE MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH EVERYTHING ELSE WE HAVE
       ACCEPTED AS
       TRUE, IT MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH ALL OBSERVATIONS, AND IT MUST BE
       MATHEMATICALLY VIABLE. PRESENT TEACHINGS DO NOT ALWAYS MEET
       THIS
       REQUIREMENT. THE WORLD IS ENTITLED TO A HIGHER STANDARD OF
       WORKMANSHIP FROM
       THOSE IT HAS GRANTED WORLD CLASS STATUS.

       All of the Newsposts made by this site may be viewed at
       thehttp://einsteinhoax.com/postinglog.htm.

       Please make any response via E−mail as Newsgroups are not monitored on
       a regular basis. Objective responses will be treated with the same courtesy
       as they are presented. To prevent the wastage of time on both of our parts,
       please do not raise objections that are not related to material that you
       have read at the Website. This posting is merely a summary.

       E−mail:− einsteinh...@xxxxxxxx If you wish a reply, be sure that your
       mail reception is not blocked.

Re: "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"                                            3
                               Re: "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"


       The material at the Website has been posted continuously for over 8
       years. In that time THERE HAVE BEEN NO OBJECTIVE REBUTTALS OF ANY OF THE
       MATERIAL PRESENTED. There have only been hand waving arguments by
       individuals who have mindlessly accepted the prevailing wisdom without
       questioning it. If anyone provides a significant rebuttal that cannot be
       objectively answered, the material at the Website will be withdrawn.
       Challenges to date have revealed only the responder's inadequacy with one
       exception for which a correction was provided.


THERE HAVE BEEN NO OBJECTIVE REBUTTALS OF ANY OF THE
MATERIAL PRESENTED. There have only been hand waving arguments by
individuals who have mindlessly accepted the prevailing wisdom without
questioning it.

On Feb 23, 5:21 pm, Uncle Al <Uncle...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

       Soif wrote:


               "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"


       [snip 150 lines of crap]

       idiot


                     E−mail:− einsteinh...@xxxxxxx


       [snip rest of crap]

       idiot

       http://ianparker.g3z.com/Relativity/

       −−
       Uncle Alhttp://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
       (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most
       mammals)http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2


.




Re: "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"                                         4

								
To top