sci.anthropology: Re: wave of forgeries in name of Archimedes Plutonium
Re: wave of forgeries in name of Archimedes
Plutonium
Source: http://sci.tech−archive.net/Archive/sci.anthropology/2004−12/0718.html
From: Archimedes Plutonium (a_plutonium_at_iw.net)
Date: 12/14/04
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 03:50:07 −0600
Mon, 13 Dec 2004 16:27:05 GMT Roger Bagula wrote:
> Dear Archimedes Plutonium,
> I doubt that this sort of email is going to make you seem saner to your
> persecutors.
I remember one persecutor who started in 1993 and would interrupt every one of my threads of
science with his hate spam and mockery until year 2002, after some observers told him to stop
ragging and stalking. So, yes, the level of hatred is phenomenally high when it concerns
myself. A killfile works wonders.
>
> Paranoia is very distinctive in you posts. If someone is using your
> legal name
I would not call it paranoia, so much as that of being outnumbered. What the ancients called
howl of the Boietians. It is not paranoia as in the last 2 incidents of 6 months ago when
forgeries were posted. And instead of Roger Bagula attempting to speak fairly and objectively
it was Rebecca Or attempting to speak objectively and fairly. And just after Rebecca said that
these forgeries should stop, she was pounced upon by about half a dozen or a dozen of hate
mongers who called Rebecca foul names, and some of them being net cops of the news admin group.
So if Rebecca recieves hate spam for saying that forgeries are in bad taste and violate the
rules and that they should be stopped yet other net cops of NANA call Rebecca fouls names. I do
not call that paranoia, but call it a sad state of affairs that people with new science ideas
have to put up with a mountain of haters.
>
> without your permission/ volition then you need to see a lawyer
> and the police. Identity theft is a crime. You can also sue the person
I spoke with a lawyer who indicates that a threshold of monetary value must be reached before a
prosecutorial case arises. That threshold involves the amount of time it takes me to have to
post to NANA that a repeat forger. And the thresold also involves NANA itself in the nonaction
they take such as:
(1) cancelling the forgeries
Re: wave of forgeries in name of Archimedes Plutonium 1
sci.anthropology: Re: wave of forgeries in name of Archimedes Plutonium
(2) removing the forgeries out of Google which does not recognize forgery posts
(3) the lackadaisical response by NANA to stop repeat offenses
(4) the straightforwardness of NANA to post the name of the forger and his address of forgery
to the news.admin.net−abuse
(5) all of these lackiness by NANA indicates that a net−cop of NANA is the forger himself
>
> for damages,
> both monetary and emotional.
IF the forger tried to gain access to say a bank account and removed money or bought
merchandize using my name and then sending me the bill, then, Roger, I would be going to court
tomorrow and the police/FBI would have the forger in an instant.
But the threshold of money has not yet been reached by the forger, unless I count the time it
takes to notify NANA that another forgery is committed.
Roger, this is about the 3rd or 4th flair up of forgeries this year, and so if it continues
then that threshold will be reached.
>
> It is no crime to be paranoid, but others may take advantage of you
> because of it.
> Your civil rights are still good in American courts.
> It might also help you case for pain and suffereing to have
> copies of all the emails involved in hard copy.
> You need a good lawyer.
> Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
What is different about this recent flareup of forgies is that the forger interrupted a science
thread in anthropology where I was discussing Throwing versus Running. Forgeries tend to
disrupt a science conversation where one poster even Plonked my posts due to the forgeries.
In past forgeries, the forger did not post into the threads where I was active and left the ISP
different from mine ISP of iw.net. But this time the forger copied almost everything of mine to
make it difficult for anyone except myself to know it was a forgery. This suggests to me that
the forger did not munge the ISP or the Message ID. Which suggests to me that the forger is
someone inside of net cops of the Internet itself.
Someone said to me that the forger is a man who goes by the name "Old Man" and lives in
California, but I have no surety of such.
What I am sure of is that time spent away from science, to me is mostly time wasted.
Roger, one last question: who hires the net cops of the Internet and who is the boss of them
and where is the physical office of these net cops of Internet? Is it part of the department of
the FCC in Washington? Because I think that the very moment I can find who the boss is, that
this foolishness of forgies will stop very fast. Because it is a pitiful shame that so many of
these net cops are overtestosteroned young kids out of college into their first job in life and
who see forgery as something of a grand game on a dull night.
P.S. but who knows, perhaps the boss of the net cops is the forger himself.
Re: wave of forgeries in name of Archimedes Plutonium 2
sci.anthropology: Re: wave of forgeries in name of Archimedes Plutonium
And if that is the case, then what the Internet needs is not a News.Admin.Net−Abuse but a
newsgroup full of lawyers where I can post these forgeries and then be steps closer to halting
and prosecuting these miscreants.
Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots
of the electron−dot−cloud are galaxies
Re: wave of forgeries in name of Archimedes Plutonium 3