Embed
Email

Re Relativity and Thermodynamics

Document Sample
Re Relativity and Thermodynamics
Re: Relativity and Thermodynamics



Re: Relativity and Thermodynamics



Source: http://sci.tech−archive.net/Archive/sci.physics/2009−08/msg01017.html







• From: Darwin123

• Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 15:28:47 −0700 (PDT)



On Aug 16, 5:43 pm, rabid_fan wrote:



The effects of relativity on thermodynamics seem little

discussed. How does temperature transform relativistically?



In a moving reference frame, a container of gas will appear

colder to a stationary observer because time is slower in

the moving frame. Slower time means a lower average particle

velocity and hence a lower temperature. Is this a correct

interpretation?



No. Temperature is not defined in terms of velocity. Temperature

is defined in terms of the efficiency of a heat engine. A good

analysis of temperature has to avoid atomic−scale parameters. An

example of an atomic scale parameter would be velocity of an atom.

Temperature is a macroscopic quantity that represents a

statistical average of different atomic scale quantities. Not all

these quantities are velocity. The mass of the atoms also goes into

the temperature. Also the potential energy, which is related to the

distance between atoms.

As an example of where your reasoning fails, the average

kinetic energy per atom per mode is often said to be kT/2, where k is

Boltzmann's constant. However, the relativistic equation for kinetic

energy is not mv^2/2.

There is also that little problem about simultaneity. In special

relativity, the two systems are moving at a constant velocity. Thus,

there is a constant relative velocity. This means that two systems

exchanging heat can exchange heat only once during their trip. After

that they are moving farther apart. Thus, relativistic thermodynamics

intrinsically requires acceleration. There has to be a means for the

two reservoirs to come together more than once. According to some

definitions, this makes thermodynamics intrinsically a problem in

general relativity. To analyze a heat engine between two moving

reservoirs, one of the reservoirs has to make a round trip.

I forgot in which paper Einstein introduced relativistic

thermodynamics. I remember that he derived the transformation of

various macroscopic quantities. What he did was analyze the situation

where there were two heat reservoirs, one of which was on a high

velocity wheel that was rotating rapidly (near the speed of light). A





Re: Relativity and Thermodynamics 1

Re: Relativity and Thermodynamics

heat engine connected the two heat reservoirs only at one point in the

circle. Every time the moving heat reservoir was close to the

stationary heat reservoir, the heat engine would produce work by

moving a little bit of entropy from one reservoir to the other.

I forgot the details of the analysis. However, I do remember

this. The entropy is invariant to reference frame. The entropy, as

measured by all observers, is the same. There was some transformation

of the temperature that I forgot. Temperature had some variation with

the velocity of the observer.





But the temperature of a body can be measured by its

emission spectrum. How is this spectrum altered in

the relativistic transformation?



For one thing, the black body formula is no longer valid. One can

prove this easily in several ways.

Assume there is an observer moving near the speed of light in in

a stationary black body cavity. The black body formula says that the

spectrum of light inside the cavity is isotropic. The spectrum does

not vary with the direction that the observer is looking. However, the

relativistic Doppler shift contradicts this assumption. The spectrum

as measured by this moving observer is highly anisotropic. The

radiation propagating in the direction of motion is red shifted, and

the radiation propagating against the direction of motion is blue

shifted. So, if you use the black body formulas, the temperature for a

moving observer varies with direction. However, the temperature for a

stationary observer in the same cavity does not vary with direction.

This violates one of the postulates of relativity.

The contradiction is not a problem with relativity, but with the

thermodynamics. In order to use thermodynamics, the observer has to be

in a state that is nearly in equilibrium with its surroundings. A

stationary observer in a stationary black body cavity can be in a

state close to equilibrium with the radiation around it. However, an

observer moving close to the speed of light can not be in thermal

equilibrium inside a stationary cavity. The radiation from the

stationary cavity is going to slow the moving observer down. The

radiation will produce "friction" with the observer.

Another way to show the black body formula is invalid is this. The

black body radiation formula that we learned is not covariant. If the

observer is moving rapidly relative to the black body, the observer

will not see a black body spectrum. Therefore, there is no

thermodynamic temperature that can be determined from the system.

Strict thermodynamics can only analyze systems where all the

components are near equilibrium. The observer is part of the system.

Simple application of the Lorentz transformation to atomic−scale

quantities does not guarantee equilibrium.

.









Re: Relativity and Thermodynamics 2


Related docs
Other docs by TaylorRandle
A Basic Look at the Aether
Views: 13  |  Downloads: 2
Re Food Culture The European Mesolithic.
Views: 45  |  Downloads: 1
Re the principle of induction
Views: 10  |  Downloads: 0
C++ Programming Certificate
Views: 10  |  Downloads: 0
sci.archaeology Re Why TEN Commandments `~
Views: 10  |  Downloads: 0
SYSPREP
Views: 17  |  Downloads: 0
By registering with docstoc.com you agree to our
privacy policy

You are almost ready to download!

You are almost ready to download!