Embed
Email

Herbert Ike Saw It Coming

Document Sample

Shared by: qingyunliuliu
Categories
Tags
Stats
views:
0
posted:
12/5/2011
language:
English
pages:
2
Ike Saw It Coming

By BOB HERBERT (NYT) 770 words

Published: February 27, 2006





Early in the documentary film ''Why We Fight,'' Wilton Sekzer, a retired New York City

police officer whose son was killed in the World Trade Center attack, describes his

personal feelings in the immediate aftermath of Sept. 11.



''Somebody had to pay for this,'' he says. ''Somebody had to pay for 9/11. I wanna see

their bodies stacked up for what they did. For taking my son.''



Lost in the agony of his grief, Mr. Sekzer wanted revenge. He wanted the government to

go after the bad guys, and when the government said the bad guys were in Iraq, he didn't

argue.



For most of his life Mr. Sekzer was a patriot straight out of central casting. His view was

always ''If the bugle calls, you go.'' When he was 21 he was a gunner on a helicopter in

Vietnam. He didn't question his country's motives. He was more than willing to place his

trust in the leadership of the nation he loved.



''Why We Fight,'' a thoughtful, first-rate movie directed by Eugene Jarecki, is largely

about how misplaced that trust has become. The central figure in the film is not Mr.

Jarecki, but Dwight Eisenhower, the Republican president who had been the supreme

Allied commander in Europe in World War II, and who famously warned us at the end of

his second term about the profound danger inherent in the rise of the military-industrial

complex.



Ike warned us, but we didn't listen. That's the theme the movie explores.



Eisenhower delivered his farewell address to a national television and radio audience in

January 1961. ''This conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large arms

industry is new in the American experience,'' he said. He recognized that this

development was essential to the defense of the nation. But he warned that ''we must not

fail to comprehend its grave implications.''



''The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist,'' he said.

''We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic

processes.'' It was as if this president, who understood war as well or better than any

American who ever lived, were somehow able to peer into the future and see the tail of

the military-industrial complex wagging the dog of American life, with inevitably

disastrous consequences.



The endless billions to be reaped from the horrors of war are a perennial incentive to

invest in the war machine and to keep those wars a-coming. ''His words have

unfortunately come true,'' says Senator John McCain in the film. ''He was worried that

priorities are set by what benefits corporations as opposed to what benefits the country.''

The way you keep the wars coming is to keep the populace in a state of perpetual fear.

That allows you to continue the insane feeding of the military-industrial complex at the

expense of the rest of the nation's needs. ''Before long,'' said Mr. Jarecki in an interview,

''the military ends up so overempowered that the rest of your national life has been

allowed to atrophy.''



In one of the great deceptive maneuvers in U.S. history, the military-industrial complex

(with George W. Bush and Dick Cheney as chairman and C.E.O., respectively) took its

eye off the real enemy in Afghanistan and launched the pointless but far more

remunerative war in Iraq.



If you want to get a chill, just consider the tragic chaos in present-day Iraq (seven G.I.'s

were killed on the day I went to see ''Why We Fight'') and then listen to Susan

Eisenhower in the film recalling a quotation attributed to her grandfather: ''God help this

country when somebody sits at this desk who doesn't know as much about the military as

I do.''



The military-industrial complex has become so pervasive that it is now, as one of the

figures in the movie notes, all but invisible. Its missions and priorities are poorly

understood by most Americans, and frequently counter to their interests.



Near the end of the movie, Mr. Sekzer, the New York cop who lost his son on Sept. 11,

describes his reaction to President Bush's belated acknowledgment that ''we've had no

evidence that Saddam Hussein was involved'' in the Sept. 11 attacks.



''What the hell did we go in there for?'' Mr. Sekzer asks.



Unable to hide his bitterness, he says: ''The government exploited my feelings of

patriotism, of a deep desire for revenge for what happened to my son. But I was so insane

with wanting to get even, I was willing to believe anything.''



Related docs
Other docs by qingyunliuliu
Work Resume - Grauwald Creative
Views: 11  |  Downloads: 0
Gulf_Impacts_v2
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
1615_RPI_091208
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Gudelines_for_applicants
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Suzuki Violin Lessons
Views: 14  |  Downloads: 0
court_2005_028_fr
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
082607homily
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Role of the Chartered Man Acct_i_
Views: 8  |  Downloads: 0
By registering with docstoc.com you agree to our
privacy policy

You are almost ready to download!

You are almost ready to download!