THE OHIO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
1980 WEST BROAD STREET, COLUMBUS, OHIO 43223
August 31, 2010
Ms. Laurie Leffler
Division Administrator
Federal Highway Administration
200 North High Street
Columbus, Ohio 43215
Attention: Michael Armstrong
Re: 2010 HSIP Annual Submission
Dear Ms. Leffler,
Attached for your reference is the annual report on highway safety improvement programs for the current reporting
period. Let me know if you have any questions or require any additional information (614-466-7493).
Sincerely,
Jennifer A. Townley
Administrator, Office of Systems Planning and Program Management
Attachment
cc: M. Armstrong, K. Brooker Scocco, J. Townley, R. Ryder, J. Hughes, M. May, file
HIGHWAY SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM REPORT
July 1, 2009 through June 30, 2010
I. Introduction
In 2005 the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users created a new Highway
Safety Improvement Program as a core Federal Highway Administration program. The purpose of the HSIP is to
reduce traffic fatalities and serious injuries on public roads.
A major component of the Ohio Department of Transportation’s HSIP is its Strategic Highway Safety Plan. The SHSP
identifies ODOT’s key safety needs, and the plan guides the department’s investment decisions in order to achieve
significant reductions in highway fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads in Ohio. The plan is data-driven and
integrates the four E's of safety countermeasures - engineering, education, enforcement and emergency medical
services.
The components of Ohio’s HSIP and SHSP have been instrumental in contributing to the improvements in highway
safety over the past several years. In 2009, Ohio’s traffic crash fatality rate was 0.92 deaths per 100 million miles
traveled, which was lower than the 2008 rate of 1.10 and the lowest on record in Ohio. The state also experienced a
seven percent reduction in crashes from 2008 to 2009, from 320,877 down to 298,658 crashes.
A. Program Structure
i. Program Administration
In Ohio, HSIP funds are administered centrally through a Program Manager that oversees the program and its funding
levels, and a multi-discipline committee that reviews safety studies and funding requests. Safety funding is available
for improvements on any eligible public road.
Because about 70% of all crashes in Ohio occur on locally maintained roads, ODOT and the Ohio Department of
Public Safety have been working with MPOs and county engineers to prioritize and address local safety concerns.
Each MPO is now required to develop a safety work plan, which can be funded through a variety of sources, including
the HSIP Program. Since the inception of the program in 2004, ODOT has funded more than $30 million in safety
studies and improvements. ODOT has also worked with the Ohio County Engineers Association (CEAO) to develop a
similar program, which requires the county engineers to dedicate $12 million per year in federal pass-through funds
to safety-related improvements. Safety funding criteria has been developed by the county engineers, CEAO, Ohio
DOT, and FHWA Ohio Division to rank these projects.
ODOT also encourages local crash analysis and safety investments through the use of Roadway Safety Audits. ODOT
routinely develops multi-disciplinary teams that jointly review local safety concerns and develop recommendations
that can be funded through the HSIP.
To assist with crash analysis at all levels of government, ODOT has developed a web-based GIS Crash Analysis Tool
(GCAT) and Excel Crash Analysis Module (CAM) tool, which can be used by ODOT, FHWA, MPOs, county engineers,
and the Department of Public Safety to aid in detailed safety study and crash data analyses.
ii. Program Methodology
ODOT’s Office of Systems Planning and Program Management accepts applications – accompanied by safety studies –
from ODOT District Offices and local governments twice a year. Applications must be submitted through the District
Offices, which have a multi-disciplinary committee that reviews and approves them for Central Office consideration.
Projects are then reviewed and selected for funding by the Safety Review Committee in Central Office, which
includes expertise in safety, planning, geometric design, and traffic operations.
Priority is given to any project that improves safety at a roadway location with high frequency, severity and rate of
crashes. Projects are scored based on:
Crash frequency/density
Crash rate
Relative severity index
Equivalent property damage only rate
Percentage of truck traffic
Rate of return (anticipated savings in crash costs, property damage, injuries and fatalities relative to the cost
of the improvement plus cost of maintenance for the life of the project).
Consideration is also given to lower-volume, lower-crash local roads with identified needs and cost-effective
countermeasures.
Funding awarded through the program is used to make traditional safety improvements at spot locations, such as
intersections, and along sections or corridors throughout the state.
Ohio’s program also works collaboratively with other local, state and federal agencies to develop multi-agency safety
initiatives through the Strategic Highway Safety Plan. These efforts allow ODOT to pair engineering expertise with
education and enforcement initiatives that play a key role in reducing injuries and deaths.
Key elements of the SHSP that are funded through ODOT’s Safety Program include:
Systematic Safety Investments
This spring, ODOT sold $25 million in contracts to install: 120 miles of cable barrier on freeways; 1,335 miles of edge
line rumble stripes on high-speed, two-lane, rural roads; and traffic signal back plates, LED bulbs and battery backups
at 907 high-crash intersections.
ODOT has also developed joint agency programs targeting SHSP Emphasis Areas. Some examples include:
OVI Task Forces – ODOT provides safety funding to county maintenance crews who assist OVI Task Forces
(funded by ODPS) in setting up, manning and tearing down sobriety checkpoints. ODOT’s Safety Program
began providing the funding two years ago when it became clear that the increased number of checkpoints
was causing a financial strain on county maintenance budgets. ODOT also uses freeway message signs to
support national drunk driving and seatbelt awareness campaigns.
Location Based Referencing System (LBRS) - This is a multi-agency sponsored project (Public Safety 408
grants, ODOT, county engineers, county auditors) that creates an accurate database of roads, roadway
attributes and addresses for each county. The information is used to pinpoint high-crash or severe-crash
locations for improvements and respond to 911 calls faster. To date, 73 of 88 Ohio counties have agreed to
participate in the program – 57 counties have been completed and are using the improved data.
Work Zone Enforcement - ODOT, ODPS, PUCO Motor Carrier Division and FMCSA have developed a joint-
agency program that targets commercial vehicle crashes in work zones. Over the past couple of years, the
state has experienced a high number of CMV crashes in work zones. These agencies developed a program
that identifies major construction zones, funds overtime enforcement and tracks crash data in real time.
Highway/Railroad Crossing Signal Pre-emption Program – Ohio Rail Development Commission and ODOT
have pooled funding for a program to develop state-of-the-art pre-emption standards, inspect all existing
locations and respond rapidly to safety concerns.
B. Progress in Implementing the HSIP projects
i. Safety Funds Available (Programmed) – Reporting Period 7/1/2009-6/30/2010
Safety Project Funding
SFY 2010
Funding Category Programmed* Obligated
HSIP $43,142,291 $54,266,281
Hazard Elimination $878,716 $1,947,041
Optional Safety N/A N/A
Penalty Transfer (154, 164) $25,624,073 $22,030,837
Safety Belt Performance Grants N/A N/A
Other Federal Aid Funds (eg. STP, ARRA) $77,185,865 $74,263,121
State and Local Funds $41,153,098 $41,153,098
TOTAL $187,984,043 $193,660,378
* Programmed = Encumbered Projects in SFY2010
Note: Differences in Obligated vs. Programmed are due to a) Advanced Construction, b) Incomplete Matches in
Billing Fund and SACs, c) Timing of Encumbered vs. Obligations, d) etc.)
ii. Number and general listing of the types of projects initiated (identifying how the projects relate to the State SHSP and safety goals). The projects outlined
below are construction costs only and do not include PE, ROW, etc.
Improvement Output
(i.e. #,
Category miles) Total Relationship to SHSP
(see Construction
Project Attachment 2) HSIP Cost Cost Emphasis Area Strategy
Upgraded signal equipment and improved
V - Rear End visibility to reduce the high number of rear end
POR Crain Avenue 1 3 $1,176,680 $13,662,057 Crashes crashes
II-Serious Crash Upgraded signal equipment and improved
Types, V-Incident & visibility to reduce the high number of rear end
ROS US 50 20.06 1 1 $81,046 $1,156,835 Congestion Related crashes
Improved traffic signals to reduce traffic
II-Serious Crash related crashes. Installed raised concrete
Types, V-Incident & median to reduce the number of driveway
DEF SR 66 7.37 1 6 $1,613,120 $11,648,313 Congestion Related related crashes throughout the section
Upgraded pavement marking, install overhead
lane use, route and guide signs in advance of
intersection, improve traffic signal visibility
II-Serious Crash using back plates and supplemental signal
Types, V-Incident & indications and revise traffic signal timing to
JEF SR 43 1.97 1 1 $358,498 $1,523,290 Congestion Related reduce intersection related crashes
WAY CR 186 GR II-Serious Crash Installed guardrail to address issue of fixed
FY2010 17 2.9 $257,120 $257,120 Types object crashes
Added turn lanes and improved pavement
II-Serious Crash markings, signing and signal equipment to
SUM SR 619 / Types, V-Incident & reduce intersection related and rear end
Arlington Road 2 2.02 $1,137,403 $5,411,627 Congestion Related crashes.
II-Serious Crash Installed guardrail to address issue of fixed
COS/GUE GR 2010 17 0.9 $544,840 $544,840 Types object crashes
Improve pavement markings and install RPM's
MOT US 40/SR 201 II-Serious Crash to reduce the crashes occurring along the
19.37/7.05 11 2.86 $742,462 $969,331 Types section.
II-Serious Crash Added turn lanes and installed new signal
Types, V-Incident & equipment to reduce intersection related and
FRA IR 70 21.330 1 1 $837,280 $930,311 Congestion Related rear end crashes.
Improve pavement markings and install RPM's
II-Serious Crash to reduce the crashes occurring along the
SEN Var PM FY2010 11 42.97 $118,745 $118,745 Types section.
HIG County Rt II-Serious Crash Installed guardrail to address issue of fixed
Guardrail Various 17 0.81 $221,928 $238,270 Types object crashes
II-Serious Crash Added turn lanes and installed new signal
Types, V-Incident & equipment to reduce intersection related and
GRE CR 9 4.55 1 1 $332,478 $398,312 Congestion Related rear end crashes.
Improve pavement markings and install RPM's
II-Serious Crash to reduce the crashes occurring along the
LOG CR VAR PM Ph. 2 11 414.74 $150,000 $157,262 Types section.
II-Serious Crash Installed guardrail to address issue of fixed
LOG CR VAR GR 17 2.84 $210,275 $210,275 Types object crashes
MER CR110/111A II-Serious Crash Removed fixed objects located within the clear
8.17/8.15 2 or 10 5.02 $1,262,379 $1,434,521 Types zone to address fixed object crashes
II-Serious Crash Installed overhead flashers to reduce the
D03 TSG FY2010 (B) 19 7 $69,415 $129,311 Types number of intersection related crashes
II-Serious Crash Installed signal backplates to reduce
MOT SR 741 7.00 1 1 $11,158 $12,580 Types intersection related crashes
II-Serious Crash Installed new signal equipment and
Types, IV- interconnection to reduce intersection related
Pedestrian, V- and rear end crashes. Installed pedestrian
LUC SR 184 1.860 Incident & signal heads and pushbuttons to reduce the
Signal Upgrade 1 22 $541,541 $541,541 Congestion Related number of pedestrian related crashes.
II-Serious Crash Removed and replaced guide signage outside
CLA IR 675 0.00 11 6.84 $140,000 $586,538 Types the clear zone to reduce fixed object crashes.
Installed warning signage with flashers to
II-Serious Crash reduce intersection related crashes and rear
LAW US 52 10.58 Signs 13 2 $127,131 $149,596 Types end crashes
POR Guardrail Phase 3 II-Serious Crash Installed guardrail to address issue of fixed
- Various 17 2.51 $202,640 $202,640 Types object crashes
II-Serious Crash
STA Long Line PM Types, V-Incident & Improved pavement markings to reduce
FY2010 11 47.17 $150,000 $176,475 Congestion Related crashes related to intersections
II-Serious Crash Improved overhead guide signage to reduce
Types, V-Incident & the high occurrence of rear end crashes and
LOR SR 0057 19.42 11 0.83 $211,658 $211,658 Congestion Related sideswipe - passing crashes
II-Serious Crash Installed guardrail to address issue of fixed
HOL VAR GR Phase 5 17 2.82 $238,930 $238,930 Types object crashes
II-Serious Crash Installed guardrail to address issue of fixed
TUS VAR GR Phase 1 17 2.97 $243,626 $243,626 Types object crashes
II-Serious Crash Installed guardrail to address issue of fixed
UNI VARIES 2010GR 17 3.00 $246,901 $246,901 Types object crashes
JAC CR 11 0.00 & Var. II-Serious Crash Installed guardrail to address issue of fixed
GR Project 17 2.78 $213,788 $213,788 Types object crashes
WAS CR 2 Guardrail FY II-Serious Crash Installed guardrail to address issue of fixed
2010 17 4.28 $268,313 $268,313 Types object crashes
II-Serious Crash Installed guardrail to address issue of fixed
CLA CR VAR GR FY10 17 2.12 $200,000 $302,138 Types object crashes
II-Serious Crash
CLI Pavement Marking Types, V-Incident & Improved pavement markings to reduce
Phase 4 11 14.14 $139,139 $139,139 Congestion Related crashes along the corridor
II-Serious Crash Installed guardrail to address issue of fixed
CLI Guardrail Phase 2 17 5.34 $266,875 $266,875 Types object crashes
II-Serious Crash Installed guardrail to address issue of fixed
GEA GR FY2010 LOCAL 17 1.34 $288,726 $304,414 Types object crashes
II-Serious Crash Installed guardrail to address issue of fixed
LIC GR2010 17 0.31 $229,335 $229,335 Types object crashes
SEN Var Guardrail II-Serious Crash Installed guardrail to address issue of fixed
FY2010 17 1.43 $204,269 $206,875 Types object crashes
ROS CR 223/232/237 II-Serious Crash Installed guardrail to address issue of fixed
Guardrail 17 1.45 $53,489 $180,256 Types object crashes
II-Serious Crash Installed guardrail to address issue of fixed
STA Guardrail FY2010 17 4.31 $300,000 $314,563 Types object crashes
Installed signage and pavement markings to
warn motorist to share the road with bicycles
FRA NORTH HIGH II-Serious Crash to reduce the high occurrence of bicycle
STREET SHARROWS 11 6.43 $78,914 $78,914 Types, IV-Bicycles crashes
BUT CR II-Serious Crash Installed guardrail to address issue of fixed
30/195/238/244 VAR 17 1.54 $263,575 $263,575 Types object crashes
SCI CR160 & CR377 II-Serious Crash Improved pavement markings to reduce
VAR PM 11 4.42 $116,608 $116,608 Types crashes along the corridor
II-Serious Crash Installed guardrail to address issue of fixed
SCI CR VAR GR 2010 17 4.03 $300,000 $331,225 Types object crashes
II-Serious Crash Improved pavement markings to reduce
MUS PM 2010 11 7.55 $150,000 $159,246 Types crashes along the corridor
II-Serious Crash Improved pavement markings to reduce
MIA CR 25A RPM 11 5.24 $18,848 $18,848 Types crashes along the corridor
II-Serious Crash Installed new signal equipment to reduce
D09 Signal Project 1 49 $379,605 $379,605 Types intersection related and rear end crashes.
LIC/MUS IR 70 II-Serious Crash Installed cable barrier to reduce the number of
23.84/00.00 17 5.04 $597,225 $597,225 Types run off the road crashes
II-Serious Crash Installed cable barrier to reduce the number of
D07 GR FY 2010 17 21.24 $1,905,294 $1,905,294 Types run off the road crashes and head on collisions
CUY IR 071 00.00 II-Serious Crash Installed cable barrier to reduce the number of
Barrier Rail 17 5.1 $1,017,175 $1,017,175 Types run off the road crashes
ALL/HAN IR 75 CABLE II-Serious Crash Installed cable barrier to reduce the number of
RAIL 17 17.67 $1,599,249 $1,599,249 Types run off the road crashes and head on collisions
DEL 23/750 0.49 & II-Serious Crash Installed new signal equipment to reduce
Var/4.70 & Var 1 21 $499,704 $499,704 Types intersection related and rear end crashes.
MOT SR 725/741 II-Serious Crash Installed new signal equipment to reduce
13.99/1.52 1 68 $747,752 $747,752 Types intersection related and rear end crashes.
II-Serious Crash Installed new signal equipment to reduce
D05 TLU FY2010 1 43 $352,890 $352,890 Types intersection related and rear end crashes.
II-Serious Crash Installed cable barrier to reduce the number of
D08-GR-FY2010 17 33.76 $3,038,213 $3,038,213 Types run off the road crashes and head on collisions
Installed rumble strips to reduce the number of
D03 RUMBLE STRIPES II-Serious Crash run off the road crashes and fixed object
FY2010 3 310.2 $422,705 $422,705 Types collisions
II-Serious Crash Installed new signal equipment to reduce
D03 TSG FY2010 (C) 1 140 $1,125,301 $1,125,301 Types intersection related and rear end crashes.
Installed rumble strips to reduce the number of
D10 Rumble Stripes FY II-Serious Crash run off the road crashes and fixed object
2010 3 74.24 $114,089 $114,089 Types collisions
D10 LED/Backplate II-Serious Crash Installed new signal equipment to reduce
Signals 2010 1 4 $26,898 $26,898 Types intersection related and rear end crashes.
II-Serious Crash Installed new signal equipment to reduce
D12 TSG FY2010(B) 1 86 $404,664 $404,664 Types intersection related and rear end crashes.
II-Serious Crash Installed guardrail to address issue of fixed
MAR VARIES 2010GR 17 3.2 $226,387 $226,387 Types object crashes
D08 Signal Backplate 1 II-Serious Crash Installed new signal equipment to reduce
FY2010 1 110 $806,793 $806,793 Types intersection related and rear end crashes.
D08 Signal Backplate 2 II-Serious Crash Installed new signal equipment to reduce
FY2010 1 100 $606,486 $606,486 Types intersection related and rear end crashes.
II-Serious Crash Installed new signal equipment to reduce
D02 TSG Safety 2010 1 29 $210,830 $210,830 Types intersection related and rear end crashes.
II-Serious Crash Installed new signal equipment to reduce
D04 TSG - East 1 72 $566,564 $566,564 Types intersection related and rear end crashes.
II-Serious Crash Installed new signal equipment to reduce
D04 TSG - West 1 121 $971,179 $971,179 Types intersection related and rear end crashes.
Installed rumble strip edgelines to reduce the
II-Serious Crash number of run off the road crashes and fixed
D05 RS FY2010 3 124.2 $156,394 $156,394 Types object collisions
Installed rumble strip edgelines to reduce the
D04 Rumble Stripe II-Serious Crash number of run off the road crashes and fixed
Edgelines 3 320.26 $424,829 $424,829 Types object collisions
Installed rumble strip edgelines to reduce the
D11 EL Rumble II-Serious Crash number of run off the road crashes and fixed
Striping 3 236 $302,980 $302,980 Types object collisions
Installed rumble strip edgelines to reduce the
D08 Rumble Stripes II-Serious Crash number of run off the road crashes and fixed
2010 3 225.04 $301,284 $301,284 Types object collisions
D06 Signal Upgrade FY II-Serious Crash Installed new signal equipment to reduce
10 (A) 1 32 $449,310 $449,310 Types intersection related and rear end crashes.
D06 Signal Upgrade FY II-Serious Crash Installed new signal equipment to reduce
10 (B) 1 104 $1,095,625 $1,095,625 Types intersection related and rear end crashes.
Installed rumble strips to reduce the number of
II-Serious Crash run off the road crashes and fixed object
D01 RUMBLE STRIPES 3 376.56 $539,940 $539,940 Types collisions
II-Serious Crash Installed new signal equipment to reduce
D01 SIGNALS 1 39 $218,743 $218,743 Types intersection related and rear end crashes.
Installed rumble strip edgelines to reduce the
II-Serious Crash number of run off the road crashes and fixed
D07 Rumble Stripes 3 562.28 $652,692 $652,692 Types object collisions
Installed rumble strip edgelines to reduce the
D02 Rumble Stripes II-Serious Crash number of run off the road crashes and fixed
Safety 2010 3 233.34 $305,339 $305,339 Types object collisions
II-Serious Crash Installed new signal equipment to reduce
D11 Signal Relamping 1 56 $867,375 $867,375 Types intersection related and rear end crashes.
Total $35,252,644 $65,728,525
C. Assessment of the Effectiveness of the Improvements (Program Evaluation)
i. Overview of general highway safety trends
The general highway safety trends for the past five years in Ohio are as follows:
Year Crashes Incapacitating Fatalities Fatality Rate Per 100 Million
Injuries Vehicle Miles Traveled
2005 358,590 11,077 1,328 1.19
2006 334,206 10,701 1,239 1.11
2007 328,742 10,469 1,257 1.13
2008 320,877 10,113 1,191 1.10
2009 298,658 9,774 1,022 0.92
The Ohio Department of Public Safety is the official repository of all crash data statewide. Historically, the Ohio
Department of Transportation has focused efforts on locating crash data to the state highway system – Interstate,
U.S., and State Routes. With the goal of reducing fatalities and injury crashes statewide, the current focus has been
to locate and warehouse all crashes statewide regardless of jurisdiction.
The state system (Interstate, U.S. and State Routes) contains approximately 20,000 centerline miles of roadway. The
local system (county, township, municipal) contains approximately 100,000 centerline miles of roadway. Even
though the state system accounts for only about 17% of the centerline miles statewide, it handles an estimated 65%
of the annual vehicle miles traveled in Ohio. The Ohio Department of Transportation collects and maintains traffic
volume data on the state system (IR, U.S., and State Routes).
Ohio has undertaken major initiatives to improve and upgrade its roadway inventory information. This project is
called LBRS (Location Based Response System). The purpose of this project is to provide a multi-jurisdictional,
statewide asset containing accurate street centerline information, valid address ranges for every road throughout the
state, along with other critical roadway inventory items that will enable quick response of emergency responders,
improved traffic crash location information, and highway safety analysis. This system will meet the needs of various
users and stakeholders in the highway safety community, law enforcement, the Office of Homeland Security, FEMA,
and others. Currently, 57 counties have completed the LBRS project and 16 additional counties are in the process of
implementing the project.
ii. Description of Overall HSIP Effectiveness
Ohio has also been effective in developing policies that expand the use of new treatments and strategies to drive
down fatalities, serious injuries and crashes.
Subprogram Types and Systematic Treatments
Some examples include:
Center and Edge Line Rumble Stripes – This spring, ODOT developed guidance for installing rumble stripes
on ODOT-maintained roadways. The guidance will be included in the Traffic Engineering Manual
and will focus on high-speed, two-lane rural routes with at least 2 foot shoulders and 11 foot lanes.
Accommodations have been included for bicycles.
Curve Safety Improvement Program – In April, ODOT received a Public Interest Finding that allows the
department to prioritize and upgrade high-crash curves statewide using HSIP and HRRR funds. This summer,
each District Office will begin reviewing the curves and selecting treatment options based on national best
practices. Many of the upgrades will involve signs and reflectors produced by ODOT’s Sign Shop and installed
with ODOT forces. Other treatments, such as LED-enhanced signs and skid-resistant pavements, will be
developed through the traditional contracting process.
SHSP Emphasis Areas
Ohio has established a multi-agency SHSP Committee that meets quarterly to develop and track the progress of key strategies affecting each emphasis area of the plan.
Below is a table that shows significant reductions in each emphasis area over the past five years.
SHSP Tracker:
OHIO SHSP
EMPHASIS AREAS (FATALITIES)
09 vs 04-
2009 2009 2008 2008 2007 2007 2006 2006 2005 2005
08
Percent
Change % of % of % of % of % of
Target Group 2009 vs. Fatalities Total Fatalities Total Fatalities Total Fatalities Total Fatalities Total
2005-2008 Fatalities Fatalities Fatalities Fatalities Fatalities
Average
Fatality Rate Per 100 MVMT 0.92 1.10 1.13 1.11 1.19
Total Fatalities by Year -18% 1,022 1,191 1,257 1,239 1,328
Fixed Object -18% 386 38% 434 36% 501 40% 481 39% 475 36%
Intersection -18% 276 27% 311 26% 335 27% 325 26% 374 28%
Head-On/Sideswipe Meeting -20% 160 16% 198 17% 202 16% 197 16% 208 16%
Interstate Cross Median -75% 5 0% 24 2% 17 1% 11 1% 27 2%
Railroad Crossing -44% 6 1% 12 1% 8 1% 16 1% 7 1%
Alcohol-related Involvement -17% 390 38% 449 38% 473 38% 495 40% 471 35%
Restraints Not Used
Driver/Occupants -16% 396 39% 422 35% 479 38% 457 37% 519 39%
Speed-related Involvement -19% 320 31% 376 32% 424 34% 392 32% 396 30%
Young Driver Involvement (15-25) -27% 321 31% 388 33% 454 36% 440 36% 479 36%
Older Driver Involvement (Over 64) -17% 180 18% 216 18% 206 16% 220 18% 223 17%
Distracted or Fatigued Drivers 11% 32 3% 31 3% 31 2% 27 2% 26 2%
Commercial Vehicle (CMV)
Involvement -27% 134 13% 170 14% 166 13% 191 15% 206 16%
Motorcycle Driver/Occupants -13% 161 16% 213 18% 190 15% 157 13% 177 13%
Pedestrian Involvement -16% 84 8% 99 8% 107 9% 96 8% 96 7%
Bicycle Involvement 11% 18 2% 18 2% 16 1% 17 1% 14 1%
Work Zone Related -19% 14 1% 16 1% 14 1% 19 2% 20 2%
CMV Related Work Zone Related 22% 7 1% 7 1% 3 0% 6 0% 7 1%
Rear End -5% 50 5% 46 4% 46 4% 51 4% 68 5%
OHIO SHSP
EMPHASIS AREAS (Serious Injuries)
09 vs 04-08 2009 2009 2008 2008 2007 2007 2006 2006 2005 2005
Percent
% of % of % of % of % of
Change
Serious Total Serious Total Serious Total Serious Total Serious Total
Target Group 2009 vs.
Injuries Serious Injuries Serious Injuries Serious Injuries Serious Injuries Serious
2005-2008
Injuries Injuries Injuries Injuries Injuries
Average
Total Serious Injuries by Year -8% 9,774 10,113 10,469 10,701 11,077
Fixed Object -10% 2,798 29% 3,010 30% 3,176 30% 3,155 29% 3,117 28%
Intersection -10% 3,616 37% 3,800 38% 3,980 38% 4,112 38% 4,189 38%
Head-On/Sideswipe Meeting -3% 1,032 11% 1,067 11% 1,043 10% 1,012 9% 1,153 10%
Interstate Cross Median -10% 44 0% 56 1% 45 0% 31 0% 64 1%
Railroad Crossing (Total Injuries) -47% 18 0% 31 0% 40 0% 31 0% 33 0%
Alcohol-related Involvement -10% 1,655 17% 1,665 16% 1,856 18% 1,901 18% 1,936 17%
Restraints Not Used Driver/Occupants -16% 1,747 18% 1,810 18% 2,067 20% 2,139 20% 2,305 21%
Speed-related Involvement -8% 2,307 24% 2,452 24% 2,547 24% 2,486 23% 2,528 23%
Young Driver Involvement (15-25) -11% 3,915 40% 3,954 39% 4,319 41% 4,640 43% 4,714 43%
Older Driver Involvement (Over 64) 2% 1,494 15% 1,464 14% 1,449 14% 1,479 14% 1,449 13%
Distracted or Fatigued Drivers -2% 429 4% 429 4% 452 4% 439 4% 433 4%
Commercial Vehicle (CMV) Involvement -17% 647 7% 763 8% 743 7% 761 7% 839 8%
Motorcycle Driver/Occupants -7% 1,116 11% 1,295 13% 1,250 12% 1,102 10% 1,155 10%
Pedestrian Involvement -15% 471 5% 533 5% 480 5% 592 6% 615 6%
Bicycle Involvement -6% 215 2% 227 2% 243 2% 226 2% 217 2%
Work Zone Related -3% 157 2% 138 1% 154 1% 176 2% 178 2%
CMV Related Work Zone Related -23% 30 0% 28 0% 31 0% 53 0% 44 0%
Rear End 0% 1,235 13% 1,203 12% 1,209 12% 1,255 12% 1,273 11%
→ RR injuries include all non-fatal injuries
D. High Risk Rural Roads (HRRRP)
i. Program Implementation
Ohio received $3.26 million in HRRR funding between July 1, 2009 and June 30, 2010. Of that allocation, Ohio programmed $2.21 million during the state fiscal year
to fund the following projects:
HRRR Project Funding
SFY 2010
Funding Category Programmed* Obligated
HRRR Project Funding $2,209,991 $3,338,839
* Programmed = Encumbered Projects in SFY2010
The projects outlined below are construction costs only and do not include PE, ROW, etc.
Improvement Output
Category (i.e. #, miles) Total Relationship to SHSP
(see Construction
Project Attachment 2) HRRR Cost Cost Emphasis Area Strategy
Improved superelevation to reduce
II-Serious Crash the number of roadway departure
DEL SR 61 0.430 2 10.58 $71,065 $1,902,200 Types type crashes
II-Serious Crash
Types, V- Constructed left turn lanes to
Incident & reduce the high incidents of angle
Congestion crashes and intersection related
SCI SR 335 9.00 1 1 $384,260 $426,955 Related crashes
II-Serious Crash
Types, V- Constructed a roundabout to
LUC Incident & reduce the high incidents of angle
Brint/Mitchaw Congestion crashes and intersection related
Roundabout 1 1 $424,140 $424,140 Related crashes
Installed overhead flashers to
D03 TSG II-Serious Crash reduce the number of intersection
FY2010 (B) 19 7 $18,383 $129,311 Types related crashes
Installed overhead flashers to
D03 TSG II-Serious Crash reduce the number of intersection
FY2010 1 15 $16,639 $185,784 Types related crashes
SCI CR 64 0.00 II-Serious Crash Installed guardrail to address issue
GR 17 3.13 $231,929 $239,670 Types of fixed object crashes
ROS CR
223/232/237 II-Serious Crash Installed guardrail to address issue
Guardrail 17 1.45 $124,809 $180,256 Types of fixed object crashes
ROS CR 223 II-Serious Crash Installed guardrail to address issue
Guardrail 17 1.24 $140,649 $140,714 Types of fixed object crashes
D05 GR 2010 II-Serious Crash Installed guardrail to address issue
(HRRR) 17 3.34 $309,163 $613,225 Types of fixed object crashes
Total $1,721,035 $4,242,255
ii. Methodology used to identify HRRR locations
Crash Data Years & Coverage
For the High Risk Rural Road Analysis, fatalities and incapacitating injuries were analyzed for the most current 5-Year
Period: 2005-2009. ODOT also warehouses and analyzes crashes on all FC7, FC8, and FC9 roadways statewide for
the HRRRP. To illustrate the crash data cleanup efforts that have been undertaken by ODOT over the last five years,
in 2004 there was a total of 381,640 traffic crashes statewide. Of those, only 35 percent (134,077) could be spatially
located on a map. The remaining 65 percent (247,563) could not be located. The majority of the located crashes
were on the state system only. ODOT has put a great deal of emphasis on improving the roadway inventory files,
crash matching algorithms, and GIS analysis capabilities to improve the crash data on all roads, not just the state
system. In 2009, there was a total of 298,658 traffic crashes statewide. Of those, 89.5% (267,320) could be spatially
located on a map, so that coverage can be provided on all systems not just the state system.
Traffic Volume Coverage
ODOT has undertaken a major effort over the last three years to gather traffic volume data on more than just the
state system (Interstate, U.S., and State Routes). ODOT is currently working with the County Engineers Association,
the 17 metropolitan planning organizations, FHWA, and local governments to collect and/or model traffic volume
data to ensure statewide coverage on FC7, FC8 and FC9s. This is being accomplished by using FHWA HPMS count
data, MPO traffic volume model information, and traffic data from the county engineers on the local system. ODOT
currently has agreements with three consultants to collect traffic volume data on all of the remaining FC7s and FC8s
that we don’t currently have volume data on. The FC9s that do not have volume data will be completed using county
engineer count data and network modeling methods.
HRRR Analysis Methodology
The statewide average crash rate for fatalities and incapacitating injuries was developed separately for state system
roads and local system roads to determine HRRR sections. Both systems were analyzed on rural major collector, rural
minor collector, and rural local roads. The weighted average ADT values for the local system roads were derived
using the available local system count data for each specific functional class based on the HPMS volume data
statewide.
The HRRR analysis methodology consists of creating a half-mile windows around each crash and grouping the fatal
and/or incapacitating crashes together if the windows are less than or equal to two-miles and are contiguous based
on FC and route. The section length will continue to grow in length if the section continues to have fatal and/or
incapacitating crashes meeting these guidelines. In the event that some shorter sections were eliminated from the
HRRR list that didn't meet the crash rate threshold, all of the locations that didn’t qualify were re-run through the
same process changing the distance requirement between the crash windows from less than or equal to two-miles to
one-mile and then again to a distance of zero which would provide a section length of one-mile around a single crash.
This process ensures Ohio captures the most corridors or sections for HRRR consideration.
Locations that are identified from the above analyses, and determined to have fatality and incapacitating injury rates
above the specified statewide average for the specific roadway type and functional classification, are eligible to apply
for High Risk Rural Road funding. Since the HRRR program is intended to consider all FC7s, FC8s, and FC9s – state and
local, Ohio will make up to 50 percent of the funding available for local system improvements. To accommodate
local system HRRRP projects, the ODOT will accept local system projects for funding through ODOT’s HSIP funding
process. Local projects that meet the criteria – rural major collector, rural minor collector, and rural local roads with
a fatality and incapacitating injuries rate above the statewide average established in the tables below are eligible for
the HRRR funding.
ODOT has put in place a safety project application review process that can be used by local governments and ODOT
district offices. The process requires a safety study which includes a detailed review of the crash data, collision
diagrams and appropriate countermeasures approved by the ODOT district safety review team. Once the district
review team is in agreement with the proposed project and highway safety countermeasures, the project application
is submitted to the Central Office Safety Program Committee. This committee is a multi-disciplinary team that
reviews all of the safety project applications and documentation to select projects that will be funded through the
Highway Safety Program. The safety project selection criteria and scoring process utilizes scoring tables in the
highway safety categories of: crash frequency/density, crash rate, relative severity index, equivalent property
damage only rate, percent trucks, and rate of return/benefit cost component. This review process includes High Risk
Rural Road Program projects. Projects seeking funding under the HRRRP must meet the requirements of being a
rural major collector, rural minor collector, or rural local road, and have a fatality and incapacitating injury rate above
the established statewide average.
The two tables below are by system (state and local) and denote the total number of centerline miles for each
functional classification and the number of fatalities and incapacitating injuries used in the analysis for (2005-2009)
based on located crashes. The specific sections that are eligible are available on ODOT’s website at:
http://www.dot.state.oh.us/Divisions/TransSysDev/ProgramMgt/CapitalPrograms/Pages/HighRiskRuralRoads.aspx
Fatalities &
Incapacitating
Fatalities & Injuries - Statewide
Functional Total Incapacitating Incapacitating Weighted Crash Rate Per 100
System Class Miles Fatalities Injuries Injuries Avg. ADT MVMT
State 7 7,966 812 5,247 6,059 2,194 19
State 8 1,124 51 356 407 785 25.27
State 9 2.36 1 8 9 568 367.89
Total 864 5,611 6,475
Fatalities &
Incapacitating
Fatalities & Injuries - Statewide
Functional Total Incapacitating Incapacitating Weighted Crash Rate Per 100
System Class Miles Fatalities Injuries Injuries Avg. ADT MVMT
Local 7 3,439 200 1504 1,704 2,330 11.65
Local 8 5,582 242 1487 1,729 1,258 13.49
Local 9 55,857 615 4,606 5,221 793 6.46
Total 1,057 7,597 8,654
iii. Overall HRRR Program Effectiveness
Ohio had 6,037 fatalities and 52,134 incapacitating injuries on all roads statewide from 2005-2009. The tables below
break down the fatalities and incapacitating injuries by state system and local system for rural major collector, rural
minor collector and rural local roads for the last five years. The tables below are showing some positive downward
movement between 2005 and 2009.
State
System Functional Class
Total
Fatalities Incapacitating Injuries Total Incapacitating
Year 7 8 9 7 8 9 Fatalities Injuries
2005 200 9 0 1105 80 3 209 1188
2006 145 10 0 999 83 1 155 1083
2007 166 11 1 1014 71 4 178 1089
2008 166 11 0 1108 78 0 177 1186
2009 135 10 0 1,021 44 0 145 1065
Local
System Functional Class
Total
Fatalities Incapacitating Injuries Total Incapacitating
Year 7 8 9 7 8 9 Fatalities Injuries
2005 47 64 145 316 315 939 256 1570
2006 23 37 81 287 301 861 141 1449
2007 51 52 137 299 307 957 240 1563
2008 43 43 124 305 275 902 210 1482
2009 36 46 128 297 289 947 210 1533
The table below denotes crashes that were not located and therefore unable to be used in the location specific
analysis due to crash documents that have missing or inaccurate information. However, not all of these crashes are
associated with rural major collectors, minor collectors and local roads. These crashes may have occurred on any
rural functionally classified roadway – not specifically on the three that the HRRRP is targeting.
Incapacitating
System Functional Class Fatalities Injuries
Unknown (2005-2009) Unknown Rural Roads 32 701
After a few years of startup activities, Ohio’s HRRR program began to hit its stride in SFY 2010. ODOT doubled the
number of HRRR projects. The agency significantly expanded statewide knowledge of the program by developing:
• tools and internal resources to assist counties and townships, enabling them to determine HRRR eligibility
and produce countermeasures that could qualify for funding
• a program Website, where local governments and internal staff are able to review the program requirements
and determine if they have eligible roads
• a presentation, made at various county and township meetings to increase awareness of the program
• a list and map of all eligible and potentially eligible roadways statewide.
However, the program continues to present challenges in spending all the allocated funds for the following reasons:
• Some of the requests ODOT received in SFY 2010 exceeded statewide funding. While ODOT has encouraged
project sponsors to develop lower-cost alternatives, they claim that interim, lower-cost fixes have already
been funded using existing budgets.
• Fatalities and serious injuries often serve as a tool to qualify for the funding, but the proposed fixes do not
address the crashes.
• The amount of time it takes to complete preliminary engineering, design, right of way acquisition and
environmental requirements for construction of the projects under development, coupled with the necessary
startup activities outlined above, will make it difficult to spend the funds in the time required by SAFETEA-LU.
Protection of Data from Discovery & Admission into Evidence
Section 148(g)(4) stipulates that data compiled or collected for the preparation of the HSIP Report “…shall not be
subject to discovery or admitted into evidence in a Federal or State court proceeding or considered for other
purposes in an action for damages arising from any occurrence at a location identified or addressed in such reports…”
This information is also protected by 23 USC 409 (discovery and admission as evidence of certain reports and
surveys).
5 Percent Report
Introduction
Section 1401 of the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (Public Law
109-59) amended Section 148 of Title 23, United States Code, to create a new Highway Safety Improvement Program
(HSIP) as one of the Federal Highway Administration’s “core” programs. The purpose of the HSIP is to reduce traffic
fatalities and serious injuries on public roads.
As part of the new HSIP, states are required to submit an annual report describing not less than 5 percent of their
highway locations exhibiting the most severe safety needs. The intent of this provision is to raise public awareness
of the highway safety needs and challenges in the states.
Data
The crash data used for the 5 Percent Report is calendar years 2005 through 2009 (current 5 calendar years).
Extent of public road coverage
Historically, the Ohio Department of Transportation has focused efforts on locating crash data to the state highway
system – Interstate, U.S., and State Routes. With the goal of reducing fatalities and injury crashes statewide, the
current focus has been to locate all crashes statewide regardless of jurisdiction.
The state system (Interstate, U.S. and State Routes) contains approximately 20,000 centerline miles of roadway. The
local system (county, township, municipal) contains approximately 100,000 centerline miles of roadway. Even
though the state system accounts for only about 17% of the centerline miles statewide, it handles an estimated 65%
of the annual vehicle miles traveled in Ohio.
For the 5 Percent Report, the analysis was performed on all public roads in Ohio. The 2010 5 Percent Report
analysis was performed on 266,207 intersections, 241,991 roadway segments, and 1,043 interchanges.
Analysis Methodology
To identify the 5 Percent Report location, Ohio utilized the statewide GIS LRS (linear referencing system) that
contains all roadways and associated crash data that have been located to those routes. Five years of Fatal and
Incapacitating Injury Crashes (most severe crash types) were used to perform the analysis (2005-2009). Spatial
analyses were performed on roadway segments, intersections and interchanges.
Roadway Segments – are portions of the roadway between intersections and/or interchanges. Long roadway
segments were divided into smaller parts to allow for more specific roadway analysis and countermeasure and
project development. A sliding one-mile analysis was performed aggregating fatal and incapacitating injury segment
crashes on all public roadways statewide.
Intersections – are portions of the roadway within the influence area of two or more intersecting roadways. The
intersection influence area is defined as a radius/buffer area of 250 ft. Fatal and incapacitating injury crashes were
spatially aggregated to the intersections within the respective buffer area for further screening.
Interchanges – are portions of the roadway within the influence area of a grade separated intersection. The
interchange influence area consists of both freeway and non-freeway segments and ramps. For the freeway
segments, the influence area is determined by the most external ramp terminals connections to the freeway
mainline. Fatal and incapacitating injury crashes were spatially aggregated to the interchange area for further
screening.
A histogram analysis was used to determine the 5 Percent Report locations for 2010. Roadway segments were
prioritized separately from intersections/interchanges. Fatal and incapacitating injury crashes were summed for each
location to develop a total hazard frequency. Locations were included in the analysis where the total hazard
frequency was more than two in order to minimize the random nature of crashes and improve the potential for
possible countermeasure development. Segment locations and intersection/interchange locations were selected
based on the highest total hazard frequency and accumulated until the hazard index number equaled approximately
5 percent of the fatal and incapacitating injury crashes for the total candidate locations.
The screening analysis resulted in a total of 54 locations for analysis and reviews to be performed. Of those 54, 19
roadway segments were identified, 26 interchange locations and 9 intersection locations. For locations that are not
under the jurisdiction of ODOT, potential countermeasures were developed in conjunction with the local jurisdiction
where possible. In some instances, review and coordination of the locations with ODOT and the locals is currently
underway.
State Contact
Jonathan Hughes, P.E.
Ohio Department of Transportation
Office of Systems Planning and Program Management
Email: jonathan.hughes@dot.state.oh.us
Phone: 614-466-4019
Address: 1980 West Broad Street
Columbus, OH 43223
Protection of Data from Discovery & Admission into Evidence
Section 148(g)(4) stipulates that data compiled or collected for the preparation of the HSIP Report “…shall not be
subject to discovery or admitted into evidence in a Federal or State court proceeding or considered for other
purposes in an action for damages arising from any occurrence at a location identified or addressed in such reports…”
This information is also protected by 23 USC 409 (discovery and admission as evidence of certain reports and
surveys).
2010 Five Percent Report Locations (Crash Data from 2005-2009)
(Sort Order: 1st-ODOT District, 2nd-Location, 3rd-Begin Log)
Location Type Segment-S, Interchange-I$, Intersection-I
Total Crash Density (Crashes Per Mile Per Year)
Incapacitating Injuries (People) Combined Potential Remedies
Cost/Time
Primary Route Begin Log
Primary Route End Log
Number of Fatalities &
(L-Low Cost,
M-Medium Cost,
Location H-High Cost; Implementation
ODOT District
Total Crashes
Description Impediments
Location
(From - To S-Short Term, Estimated Costs (Other than Cost -
Reference M-Medium Term, For Each Site Specific SHSP Emphasis Area -
Points) L-Long Term) Countermeasure Impediments) Comments Site Specific
Emphasis Area III – High-
Risk Behaviors/Drivers
Impaired by Alcohol
Occupant Protection
Devices – Nonuse and
Misuse Young Driver – 15 to
LS-Upgrade signal 25 Distracted or Fatigued
timing at Lewis Rd Aggressive Driving Older
LS-Investigate driver Driver – 65 or Older;
alcohol education Emphasis Area V – Incident
LUC- program LS-$2,000 and Congestion Related
CR- Laskey Rd HL - Roundabout Lewis LS-$1,000 Site outside the Crashes Rear End crashes
2 10 4.00 5.00 S 19 148 29.6 (Jackman to Lewis) at Laskey HL-$2,000,000 State's jurisdiction Work Zone crashes
Emphasis Area V – Incident
and Congestion Related
Crashes Rear End crashes
Work Zone crashes;
Emphasis Area III – High-
LS-Upgrade signal Risk Behaviors/Drivers
timing Impaired by Alcohol
LS-Investigate Occupant Protection
Intersection Upgrade Devices – Nonuse and
LS-Investigate driver LS-$2,000 Misuse Young Driver – 15 to
LUC- alcohol education LS-$1,000 25 Distracted or Fatigued
SR- SR-184 (Alexis Rd) program LS-$1,000 Site outside the Aggressive Driving Older
2 184 4.98 5.08 I 12 60 12.0 @ Tetherwood Rd HL-Roundabout HL-$2,000,000 State's jurisdiction Driver – 65 or Older
SR-2 (Airport Hwy) Emphasis Area II – Serious
(0.08 mi E of Crash Types Fixed Object
Whitehouse LS-Investigate animal Head-On, Cross Median,
LUC- Spencer to 0.05mi deterrent devices, and High number of deer Intersection
2 SR-2 4.23 5.23 S 13 78 15.6 W of Eber) culling LS-$5000 crashes (22%) Highway/Railroad Crossings
LS-Upgrade signal
timing throughout 2007, Intersection at Albon
SR-2 (Airport Hwy) corridor upgraded with Dilemma Emphasis Area V – Incident
(0.08 mi E of Old LS-Investigate animal Zone Detection, Mast Arms and Congestion Related
LUC- Airport to 0.11mi deterrent devices, and LS-$1,000 and LED Traffic Signals. 12% Crashes Rear End crashes
2 SR-2 7.23 8.23 S 16 121 24.2 W of Roycroft) culling LS-$5,000 deer crashes Work Zone crashes
2009 Upgraded Signals with
backplates and reflective
borders. 2009 upgraded
SR-2 (Airport Hwy) lane configuration,
(0.12 mi W of pavement markings and Emphasis Area V – Incident
Spring Meadows LS-Upgrade signal overhead signs, and and Congestion Related
LUC- W, to 0.3 mi W of timing throughout repaved section for EB Crashes Rear End crashes
2 SR-2 9.23 10.23 S 16 467 93.4 IR-475 CL corridor LS-$1,000 High traffic volumes traffic west of IR-475. Work Zone crashes
Emphasis Area V – Incident
and Congestion Related
Crashes Rear End crashes
Work Zone crashes;
Emphasis Area III – High-
Risk Behaviors/Drivers
Impaired by Alcohol
LS-Upgrade signal Occupant Protection
timing Devices – Nonuse and
LS-Investigate driver Misuse Young Driver – 15 to
alcohol education Safety application from City 25 Distracted or Fatigued
LUC- program LS-$2,000 of Toledo will be submitted Aggressive Driving Older
SR- SR-246 (Dorr St) @ HL-Roundabout, access LS-$1,000 Site outside the in September 2010 for Driver – 65 or Older
2 246 1.96 2.06 I 12 336 67.2 Byrne management HL-$10,000,000 State's jurisdiction intersection improvements.
LS-Upgrade signal
timing 2009 Upgraded with new
HL-Install second turn LED Signal heads, Emphasis Area V – Incident
LUC- lane WB SR 120 to SB LS-$1,000 backplates with reflective and Congestion Related
US- US-20 (Central) @ US20 HL-$5,000,000 borders and supplemental Crashes Rear End crashes
2 20 10.60 10.70 I 12 134 26.8 SR-120 (Reynolds) HL-Roundabout HL-$10,000,000 High traffic volumes nearside signal heads Work Zone crashes
CR 330 was formerly known
as US 30, prior to the
reconstruction of US 30 as a
4-lane roadway on a new
alignment (US 30 is now
located south of CR 330 and
there is a grade separated
interchange on SR 598 to
access US 30). The US 30
reconstruction project was
opened to traffic in
December of 2005. At that
time, the old 2-lane section
of US 30 was abandoned to
the County and it was
renamed as CR 330. A
pattern of angle collisions
developed at this
intersection and a safety
study was completed to
determine the root cause of
the crashes and to
recommend
countermeasures. Based
upon the information
contained in the safety
study, the District Safety
Review Team approved the
study recommendation to
install LED stop signs on the
SR 598 stop approaches to
the intersection. The LED
stop signs were installed in
November of 2007, and in
the two years after their
installation, there has been Emphasis Area II – Serious
LS-LED Stop signs only one reported crash at Crash Types Fixed Object
CRA- Intersection of SR (Implemented 2007) LS-$3,000 this intersection which was Head-On, Cross Median,
SR- 598 and CR 330 ML-Four Way Stop ML-$6,000 a property damage backing Intersection
3 598 5.06 5.16 I 12 26 5.2 (formerly US 30) HL-Modern Roundabout HL-$1,100,000 None collision. Highway/Railroad Crossings.
MS- Improve snow &
ice control; Perform
skid test throughout
interchange;
Investigate appropriate
advisory speeds;
improve advance
warning signage
MM - Perform safety/PE
study to consider
possible ramp
accel/decel merge lane
improvements or ramp
alignment Any impediments of SUM-76-1.29 PID77262 Emphasis Area V – Incident
improvements MS-$50,000 HL remedy would be interchange reconfiguration and Congestion Related
SUM- SUM IR-76 and HL - Interchange MM-$250,000 identified by PE of project TRAC Tier 2 is Crashes Rear End crashes
4 IR-76 0.85 1.84 I$ 24 219 24.3 SR21 Interchange reconfiguration LS-$65,000,000 Long Term project currently UNFUNDED Work Zone crashes
IMS study for ramp closing
WB on ramp from Wolf
Ledges is currently in
Central Office pending
ODOT and FHWA approval.
The City of Akron currently
engaged in PE to update
and advance SUM-77-9.00,
LS-Close WB entrance PID77269 TRAC Tier 2 which
SUM IR-76 from ramp from Wolf Ledges is currently UNFUNDED.
Main/Broadway MM-PE study of I-76 Section is also a chronically
Interchange to mainline section Any impediments of identified location on the Emphasis Area V – Incident
"Central HL - Reconfiguration of LS-$50,000 HL remedy would be HSP Freeway list and is and Congestion Related
SUM- Interchange" IR- interchanges within MM-$500,000 identified by PE of currently ranked #5 on the Crashes Rear End crashes
4 IR-76 10.00 11.22 S 36 734 98.5 76/IR-77/SR8 section HL-$80,000,000 Long Term project 2009 HSP list. Work Zone crashes
Back-ups from the Central
Interchange during rush
hours extend several miles
on all approaches and
contribute to congestion
related crashes. SUM-76-
MS - Signing 9.00 PID77270 interchange
upgrade/directional and reconfiguration project
lane assignment TRAC Tier 2 is currently
advance warning UNFUNDED. Prior study had
improvements progressed to a point where
MM - Reactivate PE feasible alignments of
study to determine proposed configuration had
appropriate long term been determined. Location
recommendations for is chronically identified on
interchange Any impediments of the HSP Freeway list top 50. Emphasis Area V – Incident
"Central reconfiguration MS-$50,000 HL remedy would be High HSP ranking despite and Congestion Related
SUM- Interchange" HL - Interchange MM-$750,000 identified by PE of varied route designations of Crashes Rear End crashes
4 IR-76 11.22 12.07 I$ 36 779 12.2 IR-76 / IR-77 / SR8 reconfiguration HL - $300,000,000 Long Term project interchange approaches. Work Zone crashes
Environmentally
sensitive features
near the location
Right-of-way
acquisition
FRA-270-22.42 Political opposition
($4,000,000) to proposed Four projects are being
FRA-23-22.23 remedies developed to reconstruct
HL-Reconstruct the ($103,000,000) Public opposition to portions of I-270, SR-315
interchange to increase FRA-270-21.67 proposed remedies and US-23. Construction on Emphasis Area V – Incident
FRA- IR-270 / US-23 / capacity and ($53,000,000) High traffic volumes the all of these projects is and Congestion Related
IR- SR-315 Interchange remove/reduce FRA-270-22.85 Site outside the scheduled to be started by Crashes Rear End crashes
6 270 23.23 24.43 I$ 25 712 92.5 on North Side weaving of traffic ($46,000,000) State's jurisdiction January of 2014. Work Zone crashes
Environmentally
sensitive features
HL - Reconstruct the I- near the location Emphasis Area V – Incident
FRA- 270 corridor and US-62 Right-of-way and Congestion Related
IR- US-62/IR-670 corridor east of IR-270 acquisition Crashes Rear End crashes
6 270 34.47 36.24 I$ 36 698 33.8 Interchange to increase capacity HL-$200,000,000 High traffic volumes Work Zone crashes
Emphasis Area III – High-
ML - Reconstruct the Risk Behaviors/Drivers
section of Main St Impaired by Alcohol
adjacent to I-70 to Right-of-way Occupant Protection
increase capacity, HL- acquisition Devices – Nonuse and
Reconstruct the High traffic volumes It appears that a portion of Misuse Young Driver – 15 to
FRA- IR-270 / US-40 interchange to remove Site partially outside this crash issue is caused by 25 Distracted or Fatigued
IR- (Main Street) "clover leaf" style the State's congestion at the I-70/270 Aggressive Driving Older
6 270 40.62 41.92 I$ 24 728 62.5 Interchange ramps. HL-$30,000,000 jurisdiction interchange. Driver – 65 or Older
HL-Reconstruct the Emphasis Area II – Serious
pavement with correct Crash Types Fixed Object
IR-70 / IR-270 superelevation and A project to complete major Head-On, Cross Median,
FRA- Interchange on modify the pavement reconstruction of this Intersection
6 IR-70 6.35 7.56 I$ 41 624 45.9 West Side markings HL-$25,000,000 interchange is underway Highway/Railroad Crossings
Environmentally
sensitive features
near the location
Impacts historical
building
Right-of-way
acquisition
Political opposition
to proposed
remedies
Public opposition to
proposed remedies Emphasis Area V – Incident
IR-70 / IR-71 HL-Reconstruct the High traffic volumes and Congestion Related
FRA- Grant Ave to S. overlap and adjacent Site outside the Crashes Rear End crashes
6 IR-70 14.53 15.54 I$ 42 902 88.0 Ohio Ave sections of IR-70/71 HL-$750,000,000 State's jurisdiction Work Zone crashes
Right-of-way Emphasis Area V – Incident
acquisition, and Congestion Related
HL - Reconstruct the IR- High truck traffic The crash issue is partially Crashes, Emphasis Area II –
70/ Alum Creek volumes, caused by the lack of Serious Crash Types Fixed
interchange and the I- Environmentally capacity at the I-70/US-33 Object Head-On, Cross
FRA- Alum Creek Dr (CR- 70/US-33 interchange sensitive features interchange just east of this Median, Intersection
6 IR-70 16.56 17.77 I$ 25 568 55.4 122) interchange to increase capacity. HL-$75,000,000 near the location interchange. Highway/Railroad Crossings
HL-Reconstruct the The NEPA study is
interchange to increase underway. The operation of Emphasis Area V – Incident
IR-270 / Brice Road capacity and Right-of-way this interchange is closely and Congestion Related
FRA- Interchange on remove/reduce acquisition, High related to the IR-70/Brice Crashes Rear End crashes
6 IR-70 22.05 23.47 I$ 25 810 50.6 East Side weaving of traffic HL-$50,000,000 truck traffic volumes Road interchange. Work Zone crashes
ML - Reconstruct the
section of Brice Rd
adjacent to I-70 to Site partially outside
increase capacity, HL- of the State's The NEPA study is
Reconstruct the Jurisdiction underway. The operation of Emphasis Area V – Incident
Brice Road Corridor interchange to remove Right-of-way this interchange is closely and Congestion Related
FRA- including Ramps at high speed slip ramps to acquisition related to the IR-270/70 Crashes Rear End crashes
6 IR-70 23.48 24.44 I$ 25 541 89.4 IR-70 Brice Road. HL-$30,000,000 High traffic volumes interchange. Work Zone crashes
HL-Reconstruct the
interchange to increase Emphasis Area V – Incident
IR-270 / IR 71 capacity and Right-of-way and Congestion Related
FRA- Interchange on remove/reduce acquisition, High The NEPA study is Crashes Rear End crashes
6 IR-71 9.97 11.35 I$ 25 521 33.7 South Side weaving of traffic HL-$50,000,000 truck traffic volumes underway. Work Zone crashes
Environmentally
sensitive features
near the location
Impacts historical
building
Right-of-way
acquisition
Political opposition
to proposed
remedies
Public opposition to
HL - Reconstruct the proposed remedies A design build project is Emphasis Area V – Incident
interchange to meet High traffic volumes being developed to and Congestion Related
FRA- IR-670 / IR-71 current and future Site outside the reconstruct this Crashes Rear End crashes
6 IR-71 17.38 19.38 I$ 46 2190 117.4 Interchange traffic demand. HL-$260,000,000 State's jurisdiction interchange. Work Zone crashes
LS-Revise signal timing
and pavement markings Right-of-way
ML-Add additional lane acquisition Emphasis Area V – Incident
to SR-161 to allow for High traffic volumes and Congestion Related
FRA- free flow right turn LS-$35,000 Site outside the Crashes Rear End crashes
6 IR-71 25.91 26.93 I$ 40 717 77.9 SR-161 Interchange from southbound I-71 ML-$900,000 State's jurisdiction Work Zone crashes
A Fly-over ramp was
HL-Reconstructed the constructed in 2008 to
interchange to remove replace a clover ramp and Emphasis Area V – Incident
IR-71 / IR-270 the weaving of traffic an additional eastbound and Congestion Related
FRA- Interchange on for the eastbound I-270 lane was constructed in Crashes Rear End crashes
6 IR-71 27.42 28.82 I$ 35 927 54.2 North Side traffic at the I-71 ramps. HL-$26,500,000 N/A 2009. Work Zone crashes
LS - Retime and
coordinate the existing
traffic signals. MM -
Expand and improve
the existing backage Emphasis Area V – Incident
PIC- Thomson Drive to road system to allow The retiming and and Congestion Related
US- Abandoned RR the consolidations of coordination of the traffic Crashes Rear End crashes
6 23 7.00 8.00 S 20 180 36.0 Underpass the existing signals. MM-$500,000 n/a signals has been initiated. Work Zone crashes
Environmentally
sensitive features
MM - Reconstruct the near the location
PIC- US-23 left turn lanes to Right-of-way A project has been initiated
US- US-23 / SR-762 provide better sight acquisition to construct these Emphasis Area II –
6 23 21.03 21.13 I 12 77 15.4 Intersection distance MM-$800,000 High traffic volumes improvements. Intersection Highway
Emphasis Area II – Serious
This location is in the city of Crash Types
Dayton, the district will Emphasis Area V – Incident
MOT- ODOT will work with This location is within work with the city to and Congestion Related
CR- city to develop the jurisdiction of the determine needs for studies Crashes Rear End, Work
7 122 2.41 2.51 I 14 67 13.4 5th and Keowee countermeasures City of Dayton and or countermeasures. Zone crashes
Emphasis Area II – Serious
This location is in the city of Crash Types
Dayton, the district will Emphasis Area V – Incident
MOT- ODOT will work with This location is within work with the city to and Congestion Related
CR- Third and Linden city to develop the jurisdiction of the determine needs for studies Crashes Rear End crashes
7 194 1.07 1.17 I 12 31 6.2 and Springfield St countermeasures City of Dayton and or countermeasures. Work Zone crashes
IR-75 / IR-70 Emphasis Area V – Incident
Interchange, HL-Reconstruction the and Congestion Related
MOT- Airport Access to IR-70 / IR-75 Right-of-way Project PID's 18249,19070, Crashes Rear End crashes
7 IR-70 15.28 17.10 I$ 34 736 50.8 CSX RR overhead interchange HL-$153,200,000 acquisition 19069, complete Work Zone crashes
HL-Added capacity and Emphasis Area V – Incident
redesigned interchange and Congestion Related
MOT- IR-75 from Grand to remove left side exit Right-of-way Project PID 75927, in Crashes Rear End crashes
7 IR-75 13.01 14.15 I$ 31 453 62.9 Ave to Keowee ramps HL-$314,000,000 acquisition progress Work Zone crashes
Emphasis Area V – Incident
HL-Reconstruct ramps and Congestion Related
MOT- IR 75 from Leo St at the IR-75 / Stanley Right-of-way Project PID 23828, near Crashes Rear End crashes
7 IR-75 14.83 16.34 I$ 32 663 73.3 to Keenan St Ave HL-$18,000,000 acquisition completion Work Zone crashes
Environmentally
sensitive features
near the location
ML-Reconfigure SR-741 Right-of-way Emphasis Area V – Incident
MOT- and upgrade traffic acquisition and Congestion Related
SR- SR-741 from Lyons control along the Public opposition to Project PID 83571, Sale Crashes Rear End crashes
7 741 3.00 4.00 S 19 532 106.4 Rd To Home Depot highway section ML-$2,700,000 proposed remedies 10/2012 Work Zone crashes
ML - Project to add turn
lanes at Virginia
intersection under
construction, to be
completed in the Fall of
2009 (HAM-27-6.29 PID
77484)
Emphasis Area V -
ML- Project to widen - Right-of-way Congestion Related Crashes
US-27 from Virginia to acquisition
US-27 from 0.07 0.23 mile north of - High traffic volumes Emphasis Area II - Fixed
miles north of Leeper St.. Construction - This location is Object and Head On
Virginia Ave. to is set to begin in the within the Crashes
BUT- 0.12 miles south of Spring of 2012 (HAM- ML - $2,630,000 jurisdiction of the Emphasis Area V -
8 SR-4 1.00 2.00 S 21 413 82.6 High Forest Ln. 27-6.99 PID 81845) ML- $4,733,000 City of Cincinnati Congestion Related Crashes
LS - warning signs and
linear delineation
installed at the
interchange with ODOT
forces in 2009
MM (PID 83077) -
project to provide - High traffic volumes
auxiliary lane from - Long term MIS for
Pfeiffer Road to IR-71 IR-71 recommends
under development and light rail as opposed
BUT- IR-71 / IR-275 slated for construction MM (PID 83076) - to adding highway Emphasis Area V -
8 SR-4 7.02 7.12 I 16 111 22.2 interchange in 2013 $3,900,000 capacity Congestion Related Crashes
- Right-of-way
acquisition
- High traffic volumes
The intersection of - This location is
HAM- SR-4 & Grand LS - work with the City within the
CR- Boulevard in the of Hamilton to develop jurisdiction of the 39% of all crashes involved Emphasis Area V -
8 163 5.00 6.00 S 19 240 48.0 City of Hamilton countermeasures City of Hamilton angle and left turn collisions Congestion Related Crashes
MS (PID 86801) -
project to replace and
optimize signal system
at the interchange and
on the arterials in the
area under
development and slated
for construction in 2011
- High traffic volumes
HL - project to add - High cost of
capacity to the construction
interchange under - Coordination with
development, with the multiple agencies,
Warren County including the Warren
IR-71 / Fields Engineer taking the MS (PID 86801) - County Engineer's
HAM- Ertel/Mason lead; no construction $1,300,000 Office and Hamilton
CR- Montgomery funding allocated at this County Engineer's Emphasis Area V -
8 619 1.00 2.00 S 14 350 70.0 interchange point. HL - $10,000,000 Office Congestion Related Crashes
Queen City Avenue From 2005-2009, there
from Dunaway This location is within were 350 crashes, including Emphasis Area II - Fixed
HAM- Avenue to east of LS - Provide skid the jurisdiction of the 13 incapacitating injuries Object and Head On
8 IR-71 0.00 2.07 I$ 29 1612 72.0 Ridge Top treatment LS-$50,000 City of Cincinnati and 1 fatality. Crashes
- 4 sideswipe-mtg/Head-on
Westwood serious crashes
Northern - 4 fixed object serious
Blvd./Hopple St. crashes
from 0.31 miles ODOT will work with This location is within - 45% of serious crashes Emphasis Area II - Fixed
HAM- east of Sutter Ave city to develop the jurisdiction of the occurred in dark-lighted Object and Head On
8 IR-71 16.90 18.38 I$ 29 950 72.2 to Burlington Pl. countermeasures. City of Cincinnati conditions Crashes
LS - project to provide
two lane exit ramp from
IR-75 southbound to IR-
275 was denied due to
adding too much traffic
to downstream ramps
in design year
HL - planning study
recommended adding - High cost of Emphasis Area II - Fixed
capacity to the construction Object and Head On
interchange, including - Right-of-way Crashes
HAM- IR-75 / IR-275 fly over ramp; project acquisition Emphasis Area V -
8 IR-71 19.00 19.91 S 12 520 114.3 interchange on hold currently HL - $50,000,000 - High traffic volumes Congestion Related Crashes
LS (PID 86799) - project
to provide warning
signage and linear
delineation under
development and slated
for construction in 2011
LS (PID 89059) - project
to provide warning
signage and linear
delineation under
development and slated
for construction in 2012
LS (PID 83076) - project
to increase friction and LS (PID 86799) - - High cost of
provide linear $230,000 construction
delineation in Lyttle - Right-of-way
Tunnel completed in LS (PID 89059) - acquisition
2009 $420,000 - Utility relocation
IR-71 from the - High traffic volumes
Ohio/Kentucky HL (PID 89068) - project LS (PID 83076) - - Coordination with Emphasis Area II - Fixed
state line to 0.12 to replace the Brent $250,000 multiple agencies, Object and Head On
miles south of the Spence Bridge under including Kentucky Crashes
HAM- Gilbert Avenue development and slated HL (PID 89068) - and the City of Emphasis Area V -
8 IR-75 3.22 4.22 S 18 791 158.2 (US-22) overpass for construction in 2018 $600,000,000 Cincinnati Congestion Related Crashes
LS - Extend channelizing
line for northbound
right turn lane at
Seward, where third
lane ends
LS - Prepare speed
study to determine if
50mph is warranted
HL - City of Fairfield
SR-4 from 0.08 project under
miles north of development to
Mack Rd. to the SR- reconfigure the SR-4 & LS - $2,000 This location is within
HAM- 4 Bypass (south SR-4 Bypass LS - $5,000 the jurisdiction of the Emphasis Area V -
8 IR-75 16.05 17.52 I$ 27 1010 76.2 junction) intersection HL - $10,000,000 City of Fairfield Congestion Related Crashes
HL - Project to widen IR-
75 to four lanes from
IR-75 from 0.17 SLM 2.5-4.0 currently
miles north of under development. Emphasis Area II - Fixed
Marshall Ave. Construction is set to Object and Head On
HAM- underpass to 0.01 begin in the Spring of - Right-of-way Crashes
US- miles south of the 2013 (Phase 4: HAM-75- acquisition Emphasis Area V -
8 27 7.03 8.03 S 22 361 72.2 IR-74 interchange 2.30 PID 76257) HL - $168,720,001 - High traffic volumes Congestion Related Crashes
LS-Road Crewzers
Program;
MS-ITS Project under
Construction;
MM-Redo Warrensville
Center Span
IR-480 from Configuration; LS-ODOT Forces Emphasis Area V – Incident
CUY- Warrensville HL-Widen and Improve MS-$18,000,000 and Congestion Related
IR- Center to End of I- Lane Configuration of MM-$12,000,000 Warrensville Center bridge Crashes Rear End crashes
12 480 23.10 25.20 I$ 30 763 10.9 480N Interchange HL-$50,000,000 High Traffic Volumes replacement under design Work Zone crashes
LS-Road Crewzers
Program;
MS-ITS Project under
Construction;
HL-Eliminate I-480 WB
Weave between I-71 NB
and SR 237; Add Lane
WB (Alt 1-6);
HL-Eliminate I-480 EB LS-ODOT Forces
Weave Between MS-$18,000,000 High Traffic Volumes;
Grayton Road and I-71 HL-$53,600,000 (Alt Public and Political
IR-71 from Snow (Alt 2-6); 1-6) Opposition to Emphasis Area V – Incident
Road to IR-480; IR- HL-Widen I-71, Improve HL-$23,600,000 (Alt Addition of Capacity and Congestion Related
CUY- 480 from SR-237 to Weaves Between Snow 2-6) to I-71 or I-480 Studied I-480 Problems on Crashes Rear End crashes
12 IR-71 9.33 10.88 I$ 24 746 28.0 Grayton and I-48 HL-$150,000,000 Promoting Sprawl PID 77616 Work Zone crashes
LS-Road Crewzers
Program;
MS-ITS Project under
Construction;
HS-Widen I-77 South of
I-480; High Traffic Volumes;
North Side of I-480 HL-Widen I-77 North of LS-ODOT Forces Public and Political Emphasis Area V – Incident
Interchange; I-480 I-480; Widen I-480 MS-$18,000,000 Opposition to Some relief expected from I- and Congestion Related
CUY- Through I-77 Through I-77 HS-$90,000,000 Addition of Capacity 77 widening currently under Crashes Rear End crashes
12 IR-77 9.02 9.91 I$ 31 617 49.2 Interchange Interchange HL-$900,000,000 to I-77 North of I-480 construction. Work Zone crashes
Part of Project to
Rebuild Innerbelt;
LS-Road Crewzers
Program;
MS-ITS Project under
Construction;
MM-Innerbelt CCG6A
Replace/Widen Bridge LS-ODOT Forces;
over I-490; MS-$18,000,000 Congestion on I-77 at root
IR-77 from HL-Innerbelt CCG6B MM-CCG6A of I-490 problems; Crash Emphasis Area V – Incident
Pershing to IR-490; Replace Broadway and $47,000,000 (2016) High Traffic Volumes; problems are likely to get and Congestion Related
CUY- IR-490 from Cuy Pershing, Widen I-77 HL-CCG6B Public and Political worse (due to Innerbelt Crashes Rear End crashes
12 IR-77 13.60 14.91 I$ 24 744 48.8 River to East 55th Below $72,000,000 (2025) Opposition MOT) before improving Work Zone crashes
Part of Project to
Rebuild Innerbelt,
Trench, Central
Interchange;
LS-Road Crewzers
Program; MS-ITS
Project under
Construction;
HS-Replace Innerbelt LS-ODOT Forces Emphasis Area V – Incident
I-490 to I-90 on I- Bridge, MS-$18,000,000 High Traffic Volumes; and Congestion Related
CUY- 77; Innerbelt on I- HL-Rebuild Other HS-$430,000,000 Public and Political Selection for DB Team for Crashes Rear End crashes
12 IR-77 14.91 16.27 I$ 34 1681 108.5 90 Components HL-$1,070,000,000 Opposition Innerbelt Bridge Underway Work Zone crashes
LS-Road Crewzers
Program; MS-ITS
Project under High Traffic Volumes; Emphasis Area V – Incident
Construction; HL-Widen LS-ODOT Forces RW Acquisition; and Congestion Related
CUY- E 140 to E 152 and Reconfigure MS-$18,000,000 Public Opposition To Crashes Rear End crashes
12 IR-90 23.41 25.24 I$ 29 560 30.9 Including Marginals Interchanges HL-$250,000,000 Proposed Remedies Work Zone crashes
Part of Project to Emphasis Area IV – Special
Rebuild Innerbelt, Vehicles/Roadway Users
Trench, Central Motor Carriers Motorcycles
Interchange; Pedestrians/Bicycles
West Leg of Lorain- HS-Replace Innerbelt Emphasis Area V – Incident
Carnegie/Ontario/ Bridge, High Traffic Volumes; and Congestion Related
CUY- Broadway HL-Rebuild Other HS-$430,000,000 Public and Political Selection for DB Team for Crashes Rear End crashes
12 SR-10 16.77 16.87 I 12 117 23.4 intersection Components HL-$1070,000,000 Opposition Innerbelt Bridge Underway Work Zone crashes
LS-Formal Study on
2009 Workplan; Emphasis Area II – Serious
ML-Widen, Provide Crash Types Fixed Object
SR-3 from Access Management; RW Acquisition; Site Head-On, Cross Median,
CUY- Buckingham to Improve Left Turn LS-$25,000 Outside State's Intersection
12 SR-3 7.00 8.00 S 15 322 64.4 Snow Treatments ML-$25,000,000 Jurisdiction Highway/Railroad Crossings
LS-Formal Study on
2009 Workplan Emphasis Area II – Serious
HL-Widen, Provide Crash Types Fixed Object
Mile Section Access Management; RW Acquisition; Site Head-On, Cross Median,
CUY- Buckingham to Improve Left Turn LS-$25,000 Outside State's Intersection
12 SR-3 8.00 9.00 S 27 192 38.4 Snow Treatments HL-$25,000,000 Jurisdiction Highway/Railroad Crossings
LS-Formal Study on
2009 Workplan; Emphasis Area II – Serious
HL-Widen, Provide Crash Types Fixed Object
Access Management; RW Acquisition; Site Head-On, Cross Median,
CUY- SR 94 from George Improve Left Turn LS-$25,000 Outside State's Intersection
12 SR-94 9.00 10.00 S 15 205 41.0 to Freehold Treatments HL-$25,000,000 Jurisdiction Highway/Railroad Crossings
Emphasis Area II – Serious
Crash Types Fixed Object
Head-On, Cross Median,
Intersection
Highway/Railroad Crossings
Emphasis Area III – High-
Risk Behaviors/Drivers
Impaired by Alcohol
Occupant Protection
Devices – Nonuse and
Misuse Young Driver – 15 to
25 Distracted or Fatigued
Most Serious Crashes Aggressive Driving Older
Involve Blatant Disregard Driver – 65 or Older
HL-Widen, Provide for Traffic Laws By Emphasis Area IV – Special
CUY- Access Management; RW Acquisition; Site Motorists, Cyclists, and Vehicles/Roadway Users
US- US-20 from E 115th Improve Left Turn Outside State's Pedestrians; Sharp Decline Motor Carriers Motorcycles
12 20 22.45 23.45 S 14 208 41.6 to appx Superior Treatments HL-$25,000,000 Jurisdiction in Crash Trends after 2006 Pedestrians/Bicycles
Emphasis Area II – Serious
Crash Types Fixed Object
Head-On, Cross Median,
Intersection
Highway/Railroad Crossings
Emphasis Area III – High-
Risk Behaviors/Drivers
Impaired by Alcohol
Occupant Protection
Devices – Nonuse and
Misuse Young Driver – 15 to
25 Distracted or Fatigued
LS-Formal Study on Aggressive Driving Older
2009 Workplan; Driver – 65 or Older
HL-Widen, Provide Emphasis Area IV – Special
Access Management; RW Acquisition; Site Vehicles/Roadway Users
CUY- US 6 From East Improve Left Turn LS-$25,000 Outside State's Motor Carriers Motorcycles
12 US-6 20.00 21.00 S 16 326 65.2 108th to Hayden Treatments HL-$25,000,000 Jurisdiction Pedestrians/Bicycles
Emphasis Area II – Serious
Crash Types Fixed Object
Head-On, Cross Median,
Intersection Emphasis Area
III – High-Risk
Behaviors/Alcohol
Occupant Protection
Devices – Nonuse and
Misuse Young , Distracted
or Fatigued Aggressive
Driving Older Driver
HL-Widen, Provide Emphasis Area IV – Special
Access Management; RW Acquisition; Site Vehicles/Roadway Users
CUY- US 6 Burgess to Improve Left Turn Outside State's CMVs, Motorcycles
US-6 24.00 25.00 S 15 159 31.8 Grand Treatments HL-$25,000,000 Jurisdiction Pedestrians/Bicycles