Embed
Email

Budget Submission

Document Sample

Shared by: linxiaoqin
Categories
Tags
Stats
views:
0
posted:
12/4/2011
language:
English
pages:
13
FEDERAL BUDGET

SUBMISSION

2003-04







Making People the Top Health Priority









AUSTRALIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION

FEBRUARY 2003

Making People the Top Health Priority

AMA Federal Budget Submission 2003/04

___________________________________________________________________________



AMA BUDGET SUBMISSION

This submission is made by the Australian Medical Association, a professional organisation

representing more than 27,000 Australian doctors.



The Australian health system including the PBS is a major success in national and

international terms. Australians experience one of the highest disability-free life expectancies

in the world.



Nevertheless, there are wide and worsening disparities in the health of major groups within

Australian society. Indigenous, low income, aged and rural Australians are frequently unable

to access or afford basic primary care, elective surgery or rehabilitation or nursing home

services and in many areas this situation is deteriorating.



The AMA believes the 2003/04 Federal Budget is the time to seriously address these issues by

refocussing the health budget and increasing it as necessary.







Dr Kerryn Phelps

Federal President

Australian Medical Association

PO Box E115

KINGSTON ACT 2604



Ph: (02) 6270 5400

Fx: (02) 6270 5499









______________________________________________________________________________

AMA Federal Budget Submission 2003/04 1

Making People the Top Health Priority

AMA Federal Budget Submission 2003/04

___________________________________________________________________________



AMA Submission to the 2003/2004 Federal Budget

Budget Summary



The AMA Recommends:



1. That the Government increases expenditure on health through the Commonwealth Medical

Benefits Schedule (CMBS), the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) and the Australian

Health Care Agreements as a percentage of GNP to address the current severe health

workforce shortage and increasing costs associated with an ageing population and new

technology and drugs;

2. That the Government refocus current health expenditure to ensure access and affordability

of health care to disadvantaged groups such as indigenous, aged and low income

Australians and people living in outer urban and rural areas. Programs that do not meet

this objective should be scaled back or discontinued;

3. That the Government commission broad comprehensive reviews (White Papers) of the

state of the medical workforce and the future of the PBS; and

4. That the Government increases the Medicare levy in order to meet funding shortfalls.



The AMA has not attempted to make specific recommendations on all aspects of the health

budget in this submission but the key areas for Government‟s attention are considered to be:

1. General practice, including non VR GPs;

2. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health

3. Public hospitals

4. Private health insurance rebate

5. Veterans‟ health

6. PBS expenditure

7. Medical Indemnity

8. Aged Care









______________________________________________________________________________

AMA Federal Budget Submission 2003/04 2

Making People the Top Health Priority

AMA Federal Budget Submission 2003/04

___________________________________________________________________________



1 GENERAL PRACTICE

AMA Proposal

That the Government provides funding to:



 increase General Practice participation in Australia to cover doctor shortages.

 increased training numbers for General Practice to meet serious structural shortages in the

longer term.

 develop, in consultation with the AMA, a Workforce White Paper.

 increase medical school university places in consultation with medical colleges and the

medical profession.



Key Issues

There is a national shortage of about 2,000 GPs (about 10% of the workforce) with shortages

most severe in outer urban and rural areas.



Other medical specialties based on consultative medicine (eg. psychiatrists) or aged care (eg.

geriatrics, rehabilitation) are also facing serious shortages.



In 2002 about 1,200 medical students graduated from Australian universities while there were

about 1,500 training places for doctors in general practice and other specialties.



There is a declining participation rate by GPs as a consequence of a relative fall in

remuneration, the medical indemnity crisis, the Trade Practices Act, red tape and unrewarding

practice conditions. One of the main contributors to the declining participation is the low

CMBS rebate. The evidence is a serious decline in the bulk billing rate.



Most new entrants to the GP workforce will not replace retiring doctors. The average outer

urban/rural GP is male, in his fifties and working 50 – 60 hours per week. The new GP

trainees in 2002 were largely born outside Australia (65%) often trained outside Australia

(35%) and 56% female. Most of this group will not wish to move beyond the major cities for

family, cultural and religious reasons.



In recent years Federal and State governments have tried to rely on attracting doctors from

overseas to deal with areas of severe shortage. However, even with a rapid expansion of this

program, it has not met the need for doctors either in total number or in relation to the

maldistribution of doctors.



Continued reliance on overseas-trained doctors has two major drawbacks. Firstly, it depends

on attracting doctors from developing countries which face very severe doctor shortages and,

secondly, Australia‟s capacity to compete with Europe (particularly the U.K. and Ireland) and

North America for doctors in the face of major recruiting campaigns is quite limited.

In calling for a Workforce White Paper, the AMA has put a number of specific proposals to

Government (see attachment). These can be summarised as follows:

______________________________________________________________________________

AMA Federal Budget Submission 2003/04 3

Making People the Top Health Priority

AMA Federal Budget Submission 2003/04

___________________________________________________________________________





1. In the short-term, the existing workforce must be encouraged to stay in medicine and

be given every incentive to provide optimal care in the areas where there are severe

shortages, including increasing the non-vocationally registered (non-VR) GP rebate to

93% of the VR rebate.

2. For the medium-term, the number of training placements needs now to be increased –

for GPs from 450 to at least 600 per year.



Work by the Productivity Commission has shown a major “red tape” imposition on

GPs time. If GPs could increase patient time by 5% it would be equivalent to another

1000 GPs, more than twice the output of the GP training program in a given year.



3. For the longer term, the number of medical school places in Australian universities

must be significantly expanded depending on projected workforce requirements.









______________________________________________________________________________

AMA Federal Budget Submission 2003/04 4

Making People the Top Health Priority

AMA Federal Budget Submission 2003/04

___________________________________________________________________________



2 ABORIGINAL AND TORRES STRAIT ISLANDER

HEALTH

AMA Proposal

That the Government doubles its allocation of funds for primary health care for Aboriginal and

Torres Strait Islander people. Additional funding is also required to establish a National

Training Plan to produce the workforce required and for improved environmental services for

all communities.



Key Issues

The health of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people is the poorest of any group in

Australia with lower life expectancy and higher infant mortality rates. Age-standardised death

rates are approximately three times higher with significantly higher rates of death for specific

conditions, particularly chronic conditions. Effective and timely treatment has been shown to

reduce mortality significantly particularly from chronic conditions.



Professor John Deeble has estimated that, in 1998/99, relative to need and spending on non-

Indigenous people, equitable funding for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health would

have required an increase in of the order of $245 million per annum. The estimate of the

additional amount required is currently being updated. The preliminary estimate is $260 m

for clinical care and a further $50 m for expanded preventive programs. This is despite

increased spending on Indigenous health over the last few years. In 1998/99, total actual

Commonwealth funding for health services in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander

communities was $113m. In 2001/02, this totalled $181.485 m. The Commonwealth

government, however, has spent much more on health services for the rest of the population in

the last three years. Equity would require a similar increase for Indigenous people.



The Primary Health Care Access Program is an innovative program that needs to be funded

on a national basis. Funding of $78.8 m has been allocated over the past four years with a

total recurrent base of $54.8 m for 2003/04. This falls far short of what is required. Funding

should be commensurate with the Deeble estimates of overall funding.



Provision of such care is dependent on an accessible and appropriate workforce. The AMA

has called for a National Training Plan to produce the health and administrative personnel

required, with increased representation from Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. The

minimum increase is 3,200. This necessitates further financial commitment.



For progress in health to be achieved it is essential that all communities have access to well

maintained services. Many communities still lack functional amenities. The AMA calls on

the Government to increase funding to ATSIC for this purpose.



The experience of other countries such as Canada, the US and NZ indicates that it is possible

to make progress. In the 20-year period between 1974 and 1994, the Maori death rate declined



______________________________________________________________________________

AMA Federal Budget Submission 2003/04 5

Making People the Top Health Priority

AMA Federal Budget Submission 2003/04

___________________________________________________________________________



by 45% and the US Indigenous rate by 35%. No significant reduction occurred in the death

rate for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander populations between 1985 and 1995.



It is unacceptable that Australia falls behind the rest of the developed world in making

progress in this area. This requires significant commitment from the Federal

Government.









______________________________________________________________________________

AMA Federal Budget Submission 2003/04 6

Making People the Top Health Priority

AMA Federal Budget Submission 2003/04

___________________________________________________________________________



3 PUBLIC HOSPITALS

AMA Proposal

The Government should maintain its funding effort for public hospitals despite the upsurge in

private hospital utilisation and use the opportunity of the new Australian Health Care

Agreements to pursue structural change which will benefit patients.



The Government should provide funding of $100 million to facilitate further development of

„step down‟ or convalescent services for the aged. The AMA, together with the rest of the

aged care sector, is very keen to explore with government the various options for expanding

the variety of transitional care service types.



Key Issues

Private health insurance participation and private hospital utilisation have both surged.

However, there should be no claw-back in the level of Commonwealth funds available for

public hospital care as a result of these factors.



The public hospitals have been historically underfunded and the flattening off in demand as a

result of the private sector upswing has merely enabled pent up demand in the public sector to

be met.



The formula in the current Australian Health Care Agreements (AHCAs) for age sex adjusted

population and cost based growth factors for escalating the base grant should be maintained

and enhanced.



In the renegotiation of AHCAs, the AMA advocates Federal funding for demonstration

projects seeking solutions to issues such as blockages in the emergency departments of public

hospitals. This would help Australia to develop a plan to tackle the approaching crisis in

emergency departments with an appropriate timetable, before it becomes a national crisis.



The renegotiation of the AHCAs provides the opportunity to improve the continuum of care

for older Australians between aged care, health care, and rehabilitative care. The current

innovative pool trial is a positive step, and should be expanded. The implementation of a

national pharmaceutical expenditure program in the life of the current agreements should also

receive identified funding in this agreement.









______________________________________________________________________________

AMA Federal Budget Submission 2003/04 7

Making People the Top Health Priority

AMA Federal Budget Submission 2003/04

___________________________________________________________________________



4 PRIVATE HEALTH INSURANCE REBATE

AMA Proposal

The Government should continue to provide sufficient funding to enable the private health

insurance rebate to be maintained at its current level and try to achieve bipartisan political

support for the rebate. However, the Federal and State governments need to work together to

ensure that there is most efficient use of that expenditure.



Key Issues

Total contributions income for private health funds was $7.266 billion in 2001-02 which

means the rebate is costing the Government approximately $2.2 billion per annum. The

introduction of the rebate was the prime factor behind the 50% increase in the level of private

health insurance participation from 30% to 44% of the population and the continuation of the

rebate is essential to the long term stability of the private health sector.



The upsurge in private hospital participation on the back of the rebate has enabled the public

sector to provide reasonable access at current funding levels. Removal of the rebate would

destabilise the equilibrium.



If the Government had to fully finance, through the public hospital system, the substantial

increase in private hospital utilisation brought about by the rebate and its predecessor, the cost

to governments would be substantially more than the $1.6 billion component of the rebate

notionally spent on private hospital care.



It is essential the Government maintains the rebate in its entirety and seeks to achieve

bipartisan political support for it.









______________________________________________________________________________

AMA Federal Budget Submission 2003/04 8

Making People the Top Health Priority

AMA Federal Budget Submission 2003/04

___________________________________________________________________________



5 VETERANS’ HEALTH

AMA Proposal

That the Government provides an additional $195 million to maintain veterans‟ access to high

quality private medical services with no out of pocket costs to eligible veterans.



Key Issues

Successive Australian governments have recognised veterans‟ service to the Australian

community by providing them with access to the highest quality of private medical care. This

commitment has been supported by the medical profession, which has willingly subsidised the

costs of this care through acceptance of the Commonwealth Medicare Benefits Schedule

(CMBS) fees for the provision of medical services to veterans.



The capacity of the medical profession to continue to deliver the Government‟s promise to

veterans by participation in the Local Medical Officer (LMO) Scheme and the Repatriation

Private Patient Scheme (RPPS) has come under significant pressure.



These pressures include the increasing age and complex health needs of veterans, the increase

in the numbers of “gold card” holders, the shift of veterans‟ medical care from public to

private hospitals and the failure of the CMBS to keep pace with the rising costs of medical

practice, including the escalating cost of medical indemnity.



Hundreds of medical specialists have withdrawn from the RPPS since late 2002 and many

more specialists have closed their books to new veteran patients. Over 2500 general

practitioners have withdrawn from the LMO Scheme since late 2002 and many more are

expected to do so when their contracts with the Department of Veterans Affairs approach

expiry in June 2003. As a consequence both the RPPS and LMO Schemes are becoming

progressively non-viable, particularly in rural and regional areas.



The total appropriation for the Department of Veterans Affairs in the 2002/3 budget was in

excess of $9.1 billion. Only $650 million of this appropriation was for services provided by

medical practitioners. Barely $195 million in additional funding for medical fees would

enable the medical profession to continue its participation in the LMO and RPPS Schemes and

ensure the Government‟s promise to veterans remains fulfilled.



Some of this $195 million could be found through the refocussing of benefit eligibility criteria

and the improved targeting of compensation and income support payments to ensure that the

original and primary intent of Australia‟s repatriation scheme, to recognise the war service of

veterans, is retained.









______________________________________________________________________________

AMA Federal Budget Submission 2003/04 9

Making People the Top Health Priority

AMA Federal Budget Submission 2003/04

___________________________________________________________________________



6 THE PHARMACEUTICAL BENEFITS SCHEME

AMA Proposal

The AMA recommends that the trend rate of growth of spending under the PBS remains at 10-

11% pa for the next five years. This should be accompanied by a White Paper into PBS

expenditure that examines the role of generics, prescriber support through electronic software

and decision support and other means, the role of expenditure on Medication Review

programs, dispensing arrangements and consumer education.



Key Issues

1. The Australian health system including the PBS is a major success in national and

international terms. Australians experience one of the highest disability-free life

expectancies in the world.

2. The Government has claimed it is necessary to make cuts, because of unsustainable

increases in the cost of the PBS. The PBS cost $1 billion in 1987 and reached $4

billion in 2000/01. The trend rate of growth of spending under the PBS has been

around 10-11% but the listing of new drugs – Celebrex and Zyban – caused a cost

blow-out that has now settled to previous levels of growth.

3. The growth of PBS schemes internationally is driven by a range of factors including

increased demand with an ageing population with chronic disease and more expensive

drugs as a result of technological advances.

4. Australian expenditure in this area compares well internationally, due to the

monopsony purchasing power of the PBS. Canada, for example, spends a significantly

higher proportion of national health expenditure on pharmaceuticals than Australia.

5. The AMA Federal Council is concerned about the future of the PBS as a key and

integral part of Australia‟s health care system. Council has reiterated its support for

the principles of the PBS to provide universal access to medicines in an effective,

efficient and equitable manner.

6. The future of the PBS must be examined with all stakeholders, including the AMA,

and within the context of the health care system as a whole. The PBS should not be

seen as a discrete item of financial budgeting. Higher PBS costs may save overall

health care costs through effective and early treatment.

7. The AMA considers that increases in co-payments will hit lowest income groups who

do not qualify for concessional PBS access, with adverse effects on their health. This

undermines the principles of the PBS.









______________________________________________________________________________

AMA Federal Budget Submission 2003/04 10

Making People the Top Health Priority

AMA Federal Budget Submission 2003/04

___________________________________________________________________________



7 MEDICAL INDEMNITY



AMA Proposal

Medical indemnity is still a major cause for concern among doctors and many are considering

early retirement or scaling back their medical practices to avoid higher risk procedures.



The Government should change its high claim subsidy scheme from paying 50% of all

settlements over $2m to paying 100% of all settlements in excess of the insurance cap under

the new Prudential Regulation Act, introduce a Government funded long-term care and

rehabilitation scheme for severely injured patients and assist in ensuring that when doctors

retire they are not faced with excessive medical indemnity insurance costs.



Key Issues

Under the proposed Prudential Regulation Act, doctors will have to take out capped insurance

contracts to cover medical indemnity in contrast to the uncapped discretionary cover they

received in the past.



The AMA‟s concern is that a small number of settlements will exceed the cap, particularly

when cases take many years to settle. Therefore, the Association proposes that the

Government guarantees any excess above the cap as this is an ongoing concern for doctors in

the higher-risk specialties.



A long-term care and rehabilitation scheme, separate from the court-based settlement process,

is essential to ensure that patients are treated equitably and the cost of medical indemnity to

doctors and the community are kept under control.









______________________________________________________________________________

AMA Federal Budget Submission 2003/04 11

Making People the Top Health Priority

AMA Federal Budget Submission 2003/04

___________________________________________________________________________



8 AGED CARE

AMA Proposal

The Government redress the chronic underfunding of residential aged care by an immediate

injection of $100 million per annum earmarked for salaries to enable parity with the acute care

sector.



The Government should urgently review the Medical Benefits Schedule to provide appropriate

incentives for doctors to provide medical services to residents of residential aged care facilities

(RACFs), in particular:



- Revising MBS items 20, 35, 43, and 51 so that General Practitioners visiting RACFs

receive more than $1.45 per patient visited after the 7th patient, given the complex care

needs of most RACF residents;

- Revising MBS items 700-886 so that the Enhanced Primary Care, Multidisciplinary

Care Plan, and Case Conferences items provide more realistic incentives to enable

GPs, geriatricians, and other specialists, as appropriate, to provide Comprehensive

Medical Assessments, and to fully participate in residents‟ care plans and in

medication management reviews, both within residential aged care facilities and in the

community setting.



The Government should provide funding of $20 million as a trial to enable residential aged

care facilities to appoint GP Facility Advisers similar to the Visiting Medical Officer

arrangements to private hospitals.



The Government should provide funding of $20 million as a trial to encourage residential aged

care facilities to provide consultation rooms with adequate treatment facilities and plug-in

computer facilities that would facilitate access to patient records for doctors and other health

professionals.



Key Issues

The Commonwealth Own Purpose Outlays (COPO) system of indexation for residential aged

care subsidies has been estimated to have cost aged care between $193.9 million and $265.8

million from 1996-97 to 2000-01, making it increasingly difficult for the aged care sector to

attract and maintain staffing levels and skills.



Quality health care for older Australians depends on the effective integration of medical,

nursing, allied health and other care. Currently, medical care is not effectively integrated with

other services that are provided in aged care facilities.



There are at present no adequate incentives to encourage doctors to participate in care

management planning for older Australians in residential care, for example to participate

effectively on medication management reviews for residents of residential aged care facilities.



These initiatives would help develop system incentives to encourage doctors, nurses, and other

health professionals in aged care.

______________________________________________________________________________

AMA Federal Budget Submission 2003/04 12



Related docs
Other docs by linxiaoqin
Volume 9 Issue 1- Winter 2-4-2004 _Read-Only_
Views: 13  |  Downloads: 0
VOLUME 35_ NUMBER 5 DECEMBER 10_ 2007
Views: 8  |  Downloads: 0
Volmer Axel-Antero
Views: 12  |  Downloads: 0
Voices for Change
Views: 7  |  Downloads: 0
Vocation Vacation
Views: 8  |  Downloads: 0
VISIT OUR SHOP CONTACT US
Views: 8  |  Downloads: 0
Visit of cellars
Views: 7  |  Downloads: 0
By registering with docstoc.com you agree to our
privacy policy

You are almost ready to download!

You are almost ready to download!