Docstoc

Reading - Evergreen Valley College

Document Sample
Reading - Evergreen Valley College Powered By Docstoc
					                                      Evergreen Valley College
                                   Program Review Feedback Form
                                              Reading
Date: 4/26/2011
Reviewed by: Institutional Effectiveness Committee (IEC)

SUMMARY OF THE DEPARTMENT/PROGRAM
Did the Review Team clearly articulate summary? Yes (Ratto & Ruppenthal) If not, provide concrete
feedback on information needed.

Did the Review Team clearly identify and assess strength and areas of improvements in relevant
areas? Yes (Ruppenthal)
Were there action plans included that would address areas of improvement? Yes (Ruppenthal) If not,
provide concrete feedback on information needed in specific section.

PART A: Overview of Program
Did the Review Team answer all questions thoroughly? Yes (Ratto)Yes, with comment below
(Ruppenthal) If not, identify additional information needed. Outline is almost too much information
(Ratto) The goals listed here are impressive in scope and detail; however, the college has no “Dean of
Academic Standards” (p.6). Please make sure that the remainder of this material reflects the intent and
commitment of this college’s Reading department (Ruppenthal)

Did the Review Team provide necessary culture of evidence (data, references, etc.)? Yes (Ratto &
Ruppenthal) If not, identify additional information and analysis needed.
Did the Review Team include action plans for areas that need improvements? Yes (Ruppenthal) If
not, identify areas and information needed.

PART B: CURRICULUM
Did the Review Team answer all questions thoroughly? Yes (Ratto & Ruppenthal) If not, identify
additional information needed.

Did the Review Team provide necessary culture of evidence (data, references, etc.)? Yes (Ratto &
Ruppenthal) If not, identify additional information and analysis needed.
Did the Review Team include action plans for areas that need improvements? Yes (Ratto &
Ruppenthal)) If not, identify areas and information needed.

PART C: STUDENT OUTCOMES
Did the Review Team answer all questions thoroughly? Yes (Ratto) No (Ruppenthal) If not, identify
additional information needed. Even though this is a “department”, all departments also fit the

                                                   1



Program Review feedback form
IEC (Ratto & Ruppenthal) 4_26_11
VP Academic Affairs
definition of a “program” for Program Review purposes. Therefore, IEC suggests that department-level
SLOs are needed (Ruppenthal)

Did the Review Team provide necessary culture of evidence (data, references, etc.)? Yes (Ratto &
Ruppenthal) If not, identify additional information and analysis needed.
Did the Review Team include action plans for areas that need improvements? N/A (Ruppenthal) If not,
identify areas and information needed.

PART D: FACULTY AND STAFF
Did the Review Team answer all questions thoroughly? No (Ratto) Yes (Ruppenthal) If not, identify
additional information needed.

Did the Review Team provide necessary culture of evidence (data, references, etc.)? No (Ratto) Yes
(Ruppenthal) If not, identify additional information and analysis needed.
Did the Review Team include action plans for areas that need improvements? No (Ratto) N/A
(Ruppenthal) If not, identify areas and information needed.

PART E: FACILITIES, EQUIPMENT, MATERIALS AND MAINTENANCE
Did the Review Team answer all questions thoroughly? Yes (Ratto & Ruppenthal) If not, identify
additional information needed.

Did the Review Team provide necessary culture of evidence (data, references, etc.)? Yes (Ratto &
Ruppenthal) If If not, identify additional information and analysis needed.

Did the Review Team include action plans for areas that need improvements? ? (Ratto) Yes
(Ruppenthal) If not, identify areas and information needed. Better stated or a clear plan (Ratto)

PART F: FUTURE NEEDS
Did the Review Team answer all questions thoroughly? Yes (Ratto & Ruppenthal) If not, identify
additional information needed.

Did the Review Team provide necessary culture of evidence (data, references, etc.)? Yes (Ratto &
Ruppenthal) If not, identify additional information and analysis needed.
Did the Review Team include action plans for areas that need improvements? Yes (Ratto &
Ruppenthal) If not, identify areas and information needed. Again, a clear plan needed here also
(Ratto)

PART G: ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Provide concrete questions or feedback if needed.

                                                   2



Program Review feedback form
IEC (Ratto & Ruppenthal) 4_26_11
VP Academic Affairs

				
DOCUMENT INFO
Shared By:
Categories:
Tags:
Stats:
views:0
posted:12/3/2011
language:English
pages:2