Embed
Email

Progress Report

Document Sample

Shared by: liamei12345
Categories
Tags
Stats
views:
0
posted:
12/3/2011
language:
English
pages:
14
Channel Allocation in

Cellular Networks

Heuristic Methods









Jie Chen David Seah Wen Xu

Overview

● The Channel Allocation Problem

● Three Heuristic Algorithms

● Simulated Annealing

● Genetic Algorithm

● Tabu Search

● Comparison and Observations

● Conclusion

The Problem

● Channel Allocation Problem (CAP)









● Traffic Vector

● T = [32, 26, 14, 32, 18, 20, 14]

● Decision Variable

The Problem

● Interference Matrix

● Co-channel constraint

● Co-cell constraint

2 1 0 0 0 0 0

1 2 1 1 1 0 0

0 1 2 0 1 0 0

I= 0 1 0 2 1 1 0

0 1 1 1 2 1 1

0 0 0 1 1 2 1

0 0 0 0 1 1 2







● Cost function

The Problem

● Neighborhood definitions

● Random Selection

● Cycling

● Probability-based

● GSAT-like

Simulated Annealing

● Neighborhood Definition

● Random Selection

● Initial Temperature

● Pinitial = exp(-Δ cost / T0 )

● T0=k σ, where k= - 3/(ln Pinitial)

● M, b, a

Genetic Algorithm

● Fitness Mapping

● Selection

● Crossover

● Mutation

● Standard

● Greedy

● Population Size

● Elitism

Tabu Search

● Neighborhood definition

● GSAT-like

● Tabu Restriction

● A swap pair changes from (0,1) to (1,0)

● A swap pair changes from (1,0) to (0,1)

● At least one of the above occurs

● Tabu Tenure & Candidate List Size

Tabu Search

● Memory usage

● Short term

● Aspiration Criterion

● Global Aspiration by Objective

● Tabu list data structure

● Three-dimensional 7*50*50 array

Comparisons / Observations

● Results

Cost Eval. SA GA TS GS

Avg. 10,000 81.3 114.13 81.6 90.5

Best

50,000 77.5 87.38 77 89

Cost

100,000 76.8 84.25 76.6 89

Std 10,000 1.49 3.44 1.27 4.68

50,000 0.85 2.22 0.95 3.29

100,000 1.32 2.15 0.84 3.29

Best Cost Found 75 78 75 85

Comparisons / Observations

● Results

Comparisons / Observations



● Result Summary



● SA and TS performed comparably

and better than GA

● GA performed better than Greedy Search

(GS)

Comparisons / Observations

● How good are the results acquired?

● Compared to GS and RGS

● What is the global optimum?

● Lower bound is 63

● How many users can actually be

supported?

● Upper bound is 133

● Lower bound is 130 (priority-based optimization

method)

Conclusion

● Three major heuristic methods (SA, GA,

TS) have been applied to CAP for

cellular networks.

● TS and SA can achieve good

performance, but GA performs worse.

● A simple priority-based optimization

method is presented to find the optimal

channel assignment.


Shared by: liamei12345
Other docs by liamei12345
eCampus TOP Course Template
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Media Kit 2011
Views: 2  |  Downloads: 0
14-43-23_09_11_460
Views: 2  |  Downloads: 0
thermal
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
DRC Water Plant alarm guidance
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
why-phil-got-my-post-wrong
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Guideline
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
map4
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
mlar1_stats_sep11
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Related docs
By registering with docstoc.com you agree to our
privacy policy

You are almost ready to download!

You are almost ready to download!