Embed
Email

Public sector taxonomies and the Integrated Public Sector ...

Document Sample
Public sector taxonomies and the Integrated Public Sector ...
Shared by: HC111203161821
Categories
Tags
Stats
views:
0
posted:
12/3/2011
language:
English
pages:
33
Public sector taxonomies and the

Integrated Public Sector Vocabulary Project



Sheila Apicella

Cathy Day

Lindsay Ould

Three main taxonomies:



• GCL (Government Category List)

http://www.govtalk.gov.uk/schemasstandards/gcl.asp





• LGCL (Local Government Category List)

http://www.esd.org.uk/standards/lgcl/





• seamlessUK taxonomy

http://www.seamlessuk.info/







Page 2

One vocabulary will reduce the confusion for public sector

organisations (1)





The single vocabulary supports citizens,

customers and staff by offering easier, more

efficient access to information by:

• consistent indexing, categorisation and retrieval

• interoperability across data sets from multiple

organisations

• the ability to offer the same information across a

variety of delivery channels



Page 3

One vocabulary will reduce the confusion for public sector

organisations (2)





• It will provide the mandatory encoding scheme for the

eGMS’s Subject element.

• It will support the delivery of the Office of the Deputy

Prime Minister Priority Outcome R3 “Community

Information.”

• One vocabulary will reduce the overheads, costs and

workload required to implement a controlled vocabulary

within content management systems, search systems and

automatic metadata creation systems.

• One vocabulary will offer a strategic advantage in linking

e-enabled services to the Government's Directgov portal

(www.direct.gov.uk).

Page 4

Enables links to external websites









Page 5

Enables new policies to thrive









Page 6

Is there a Business Case for using IPSV?





• Information is a valuable asset, • Annual efficiency savings

like buildings, finance and • Service improvement

people – it should be valued • Strategic benefits

• Managing your intellectual • CPA

capital will show business

benefits • PSTOs

• Quick, accurate response to • National Strategy

information requests cuts down • FOI

handling time • Reduces risk

• Greater depth of information for

evaluation enables more

informed decisions

• Gives customers greater

confidence – first time resolution





Page 7

LAWs Benefits

LAWs in Support of Meeting Government Targets

CPA Framework Priority Service Outcomes Efficiency Programme National Strategy



•Corporate Assessment Schools Transactions Transforming Services

Ambition Community Information Corporate Services Renewing Local Democracy

Prioritisation Democratic Renewal Procurement Promoting Economic

Vitality

Capacity Local Environment Policy Funding and

Regulation Bridging the Digital Divide –

Performance Management E-Procurement

e-Inclusion

•Achievement and Payments Productive Time

Efficiency

Investment

Libraries, Sports & Leisure

“Liveability”/

Safer & Stronger

Transport Environmental Quality

Communities

Benefits BVPI 157

Sustainable

Communities and Support for Vulnerable People

transport

Supporting New Ways of

Healthier Working Key

Communities (not

Accessibility of Services

districts) High Benefit Medium Benefit

High Take-up of Web-based

Children and Young

Transactional Services

People (not districts)

Making it Easy to do Business Lower Benefit N/A

Use of Resources

with the Council









Page 8

LAWs Benefits



LAWs Benefits Matrix

Yes Cost Reduction & Efficiency Savings Service Improvement/ Added Value

• Avoidance of licence fees for Content Mgt System • Avoidance of licence fees for commercial alternatives

to LGOL-Net and Formbuilder products and cost of

• Avoidance of cost to maintain individual category

connectors to individual applications

lists

• Reduction in man-hours required to develop

transactional services for web-site through use of

starter kit.

• Organisational Development guideline can save

Financial









organisational structure consultancy and HR

effort





Service Improvement/ Added Value Strategic & Intangible Benefits

• Increased availability of on-line services • LGCL provides consistent model for all channels,

enabling delivery of local services through a variety of

• Category List improves ease of finding items on

portals e.g. DirectGov

website

• APLAWS+ is shaping the market, encouraging suppliers

to tailor more products for local authorities. LGOL-Net

also simplifies procurement of middleware

• Community Engagement Modules enable use of

No on-line facilities to support community activity

• Accessibility guide aids compliance to DDA.

Yes No

Quantifiable

Page 9

So……what does IPSV look like?



• 16 top level terms

• 2700 preferred terms

• 4200 non-preferred terms

• ISO 2788 compliant

• No distinction between categories &

keywords

• Poly-hierarchical

• Not a navigation structure

• An abridged view available for central

government use

Page 10

IPSV home page

http://www.esd.org.uk/standards/ipsv/









Page 11

Word version of IPSV









Page 12

IPSV XML









Page 13

Top level – interactive tree









Page 14

Interactive Viewer









Page 15

IPSV Discussion Forum









Page 16

Progress to date (1)



• Very positive feedback being received

• Sustainability model in progress / editorial policies

agreed

• Construction now complete / version 1 released

www.esd.org.uk/standards/ipsv

• Consultation forums still running at

http://www.esd-toolkit.org/integratedforums/

• Papers available on eSB Custodian site

http://www.localegov-standards.gov.uk/custodian







Page 17

Progress to date (2)



• A-Z published in conjunction with

ENCORE project

• Suggested Navigation Structure

published in conjunction with LB Brent

• Further comments collated /

documentation finalised April – May

• Editor to be appointed

• Continued maintenance to take place

• Further extensions to be considered

(e.g. Internal Activities)

Page 18

How should you use / implement the IPSV?

• Not started building in the LGCL or haven’t got very far? You can start

to implement IPSV from 1 April 2005.

• The ODPM has agreed that the IPSV is a recognised taxonomy and will

meet the requirements of Local e-Government Priority Outcome R3.

• Authorities that are currently implementing the LGCL as part of R3

should continue to do so. (Further guidance and support around

implementation of metadata and migration to the IPSV after December

2005 will follow.)

• Mappings to IPSV are provided from LGCL and LGSL

• From Summer 2005, e-GMS will recommend IPSV as the mandatory

encoding scheme for subject metadata in place of GCL.

• You should be prepared to migrate to the new list to enable

interoperability across the public sector.

• The date for completion of migration has not yet been fixed. Version 1 of

IPSV (Integrated Public Sector Vocabulary) now available

Page 19

Guidance & Documentation Coming Soon!



• How To Meta Tag

• Maintenance Guide / Editorial Policy

• Tips on Implementing the IPSV

• Tips on Migrating from LGCL / GCL

• Business Case for implementing a

shared standardised vocabulary

across the public sector

• Guidance on using IPSV in esd-

toolkit and how it relates to other lists





Page 20

ENCORE Project demonstrators

• The ENCORE National Project e-Community Workstream

http://www.encore.gov.uk/ is trialling the use of IPSV in its

search, A-Z and semi automatic metatagger demonstrator



• The search system recognises metatags containing IPSV

terms and uses this to improve the ranking of hits



• A basic A-Z of local authority services originally drawn from

the A-Z on the Essex Online Portal



• This A-Z will be added to the IPSV XML schema A-Z field



• IPSV is also presented in full to allow users to browse and

search for content over a wide range of local and national

content



• Very much a work in progress, being demonstrated today on

the ENCORE stand

Page 21

ENCORE A-Z









Page 22

A-Z results for Chelmsford Borough









Page 23

Follow link to local web page









Page 24

IPSV in ENCORE browse interface









Page 25

Hits returned by navigating down the hierarchy









Page 26

Result - Local web page









Page 27

Suggested Navigation Structure



• Based on Brent’s PHS structure

which has received a great deal of

consultation and acclaim

• Is a poly-hierarchical navigation

structure

• Maps to LGSL

• Will be a “tree view” in esd-toolkit

• Can be viewed at

www.esd.org.uk/standards/lgnl





Page 28

Where can you find IPSV and the related

products?

• Version 1 available

www.esd.org.uk/standards/ipsv

• Suggested navigation structure

www.esd.org.uk/standards/lgnl

• Shared esd-toolkit / eSB forums

www.esd-toolkit.org/integratedforums/

• eSB Custodian Website (Search under IPSV)

www.legsb.gov.uk/

• Contact

sheila.apicella@legsb.gov.uk

07769 692989

Page 29

London Borough of Lewisham – Case Study



• Inner London Borough – unitary with

246,000 residents

• Directly elected Mayor

• Microsoft Infrastructure including

Content Management Server and

Sharepoint Portal Server

• Current site is SQL/ASP and HTML

• Content Plus rated in SOCITM 2005

• Site re-launch planned for June 05

• Service focus with supporting

information

Page 30

Implementing IPSV



• Re-launch timing fits in with IPSV

• Risk in using version 1 at this stage

• Service focus allows use of mappings

between lists – can be automated

• Issues for integrated systems –

Sharepoint and CMS

• Requirement for internal facing terms

• Exploitation of taxonomy

• Use of IPSV terms for Navigation

• Search engine configuration issues

Page 31

Next Steps for Lewisham



• Resources required to move to next

version – Management Information

Requirements

• Definition of role to allocate terms –

automation vs skilled staff

• Benchmarking group with SEALEGS

authorities

• Extension of IPSV - Internal terms

and process mapping

• Exploiting taxonomy to allow

integration with Directgov and

London Portal

Page 32

Some unanswered questions and challenges for

discussion

• Can migration be • What other lists are

automated needed to add to the

• How much can “family” of lists

suppliers help LAs • Does Google do it

• Is it possible to help better

each other setting up • What enhancements

optimum searches to esd-toolkit would

• Can suppliers help in help in viewing and

future version getting information

updates about the lists









Page 33


Related docs
Other docs by HC111203161821
MARTES 23 DE NOVIEMBRE DE 2010
Views: 21  |  Downloads: 0
Center Grove Bantam Football
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
CapGemini
Views: 2  |  Downloads: 0
2CIG
Views: 43  |  Downloads: 0
H&S Feeder Wagons
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
HORS D� OEUVRES SELECTIONS
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Cuprins
Views: 4  |  Downloads: 0
27 marzo
Views: 2  |  Downloads: 0
Florida Law Enforcement Games
Views: 1  |  Downloads: 0
By registering with docstoc.com you agree to our
privacy policy

You are almost ready to download!

You are almost ready to download!